|Publication number||US6907005 B1|
|Application number||US 09/621,672|
|Publication date||Jun 14, 2005|
|Filing date||Jul 24, 2000|
|Priority date||Jul 24, 2000|
|Also published as||DE60124923D1, DE60124923T2, EP1307990A2, EP1307990B1, US20050094667, WO2002009342A2|
|Publication number||09621672, 621672, US 6907005 B1, US 6907005B1, US-B1-6907005, US6907005 B1, US6907005B1|
|Inventors||Erik Dahlman, Stefan Parkvall|
|Original Assignee||Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ)|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (9), Non-Patent Citations (6), Referenced by (131), Classifications (12), Legal Events (4)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
The present invention relates to data communications, and more particularly, to reliable data delivery in a communications system.
In digital data communications systems, it is common for data packets transmitted over a communications channel to be corrupted by errors, e.g., when communicating in hostile environments. Wireless radio communications are often conducted in an especially hostile environment. The radio channel is subjected to a barrage of corrupting factors including noise, rapidly changing communications channel characteristics, multi-path fading, and time dispersion which may cause intersymbol interference, and interference from adjacent channel communications.
There are numerous techniques that may be employed by a receiver to detect such errors. One example of an error detection technique is the well-known Cyclic Redundancy Check (CRC). Other techniques use more advanced types of block codes or convolutional codes to accomplish both error detection and error correction. For both error detection and error correction, channel coding is applied which adds redundancy to the data. When information is received over a communications channel, the received data is decoded using the redundancy to detect if the data has been corrupted by errors. The more redundancy built into a unit of data, the more likely errors can be accurately detected, and in some instances, corrected.
In many communication systems, including wireless communications, it is desirable to have a reliable data delivery service that guarantees delivery of data units sent from one machine to another without duplication of data or data loss. Most such reliable data delivery protocols use a fundamental retransmission technique where the receiver of the data responds to the sender of the data with acknowledgements and/or negative acknowledgements This technique is commonly known as Automatic Repeat reQuest (ARQ) transaction processing. Coded data packets are transmitted from a sender to a receiver over a communications channel. Using the error detection bits (the redundancy) included in the coded data packet, each received data packet is processed by the receiver to determine if tile data packet was received correctly or corrupted by errors. If the packet was correctly received, the receiver transmits an acknowledgement (ACK) signal back to the sender. In the most simple form of ARQ, sometimes called Stop-and-Wait (S&W) ARQ, the sender of the data stores each sent packet and waits for an acknowledgement of this packet before sending the next packet. When the ACK is received, the sender discards the stored packet and sends the next packet. An example of a Stop-and-Wait ARQ process is shown in FIG. 1. Vertical distance down the figure represents increasing time, and diagonal lines across the middle represent network data transmissions including acknowledgements.
Stop-and-Wait ARQ decreases throughput because the sender must delay sending a new packet until it receives an acknowledgement for the previous packet. To avoid this problem, a sliding window form of acknowledgement and retransmission may be employed. With a predetermined window of size W, the sender may transmit up to W consecutive packets before an acknowledgement is received. If the sender does not receive an ACK signal for a specific packet within a predetermined time window, or if the sender receives a NACK signal for a specific packet, the sender retransmits either this data packet (selective repeat ARQ) or this packet and all subsequently transmitted packets (goback-N ARQ). In the example shown in FIGS. 3(a) and 3(b), the window is eight packets in length, and it slides so that packet nine (9) can be sent when an acknowledgement is received for packet one (1).
Because the sliding window ARQ protocol offers the possibility to keep the network saturated with packets, it can achieve substantially higher throughput than a simple Stop-and-Wait protocol. Another example of three packets transmitted using a sliding window ARQ protocol is shown in FIG. 4. The main point illustrated is that the sender can transmit all packets in the window without waiting for an acknowledgement.
Sequence numbers may be assigned to each transmitted data packet.
Sequence numbers are used in the ARQ protocol to identify lost packets and to identify the reception of multiple copies of the same packet. The receiver typically includes the sequence numbers in the acknowledgements, so that acknowledgements can be correctly associated with the corresponding buffered packets. Unfortunately, adding and processing sequence numbers complicates the ARQ protocol implementation.
One simple way of implementing a retransmission scheme is disclosed by David Chase in an article entitled “Code Combining —A Maximum-Likelihood Decoding Approach for Combining an Arbitrary Number of Noisy Packets,” IEEE Transactions on Communications, May 1985, pages 385-391. In this scheme, two Stop-and-Wait ARQ schemes run in parallel and access the channel in alternating time slots as shown in FIG. 5. Each queue keeps track of only one outstanding packet. The odd queue transmits one packet and waits for a positive acknowledgement before moving on to the next packet in the queue. While the receiver processes the received packet from the odd queue, the even queue transmits a packet to the receiver, and so on. The use of these two parallel queues eliminates the significant drawback of the single-queue, Stop-and-Wait ARQ—low throughput—while keeping the simplicity of the Stop-and-Wait protocol.
For the dual queue Stop-and-Wait ARQ protocol to operate properly, however, the receiver must be able to decode and acknowledge a received packet during the time slot during which the other queue is transmitting a packet. It may be difficult to complete this decoding and acknowledgement within the available time when data is transmitted at high speed. For example, high speed data transmitted in a downlink direction from a radio network to a wireless user equipment terminal in cellular radio communications systems may be problematic if the user equipment has only limited processing capabilities to perform the necessary decoding. Time slots may be fairly short, e.g., for scheduling reasons, on the order of just a few milliseconds. During this relatively to short time, the receiver must decode and process a data packet, which in the case of high data rates, may contain several thousands of bits. If the receiver does not completely process such a data packet and transmit an acknowledgement within this short time frame, the transmitter schedules a retransmission of that entire data packet, even if the packet could be correctly decoded. Such unnecessary retransmission of data packets seriously degrades throughput because the radio channel is occupied with retransmission of already correctly decoded data packets.
One possibility to increase the amount of time available for decoding and processing data packets at the receiver is to employ more than two parallel queues, i.e., to allow more than two outstanding packets at the same time. However, using parallel queues increases buffering requirements at both the transmitter and the receiver because each outstanding packet requires its own buffer. Buffering requirements are even more of a concern if “soft” information needs to be buffered at the receiver, as is the case if so-called incremental redundancy is used for the retransmissions. In case of incremental redundancy, the receiver combines multiple retransmissions of the same packet (i.e., combining of “soft information”) before decoding. The use of soft information requires substantially more memory as compared to “hard” information. Moreover, having multiple queues does not reduce the overall data processing speed requirements (millions of instructions per second (MIPS)) in the receiver, even though parallel processing can be advantageous.
Accordingly, it is an object of the present invention to provide a flexible ARQ scheme that permits trading off a desired performance with one or more communication resources required to achieve the desired performance. For example, such a scheme should be able to provide in one instance, higher performance in terms of higher data throughput at a higher resource cost, while in another instance also provide lower performance at a significantly reduced resource cost. The present invention provides such a flexible ARQ scheme.
A communications channel is set up between a transmitter and a receiver. A value is selected for a first parameter of a reliable data packet delivery procedure (RDPDP) for data packets transmitted over the communications channel. The first RDPDP parameter value is selected in accordance with a trade-off between a desired performance or goal, e.g., a specific throughput of data packets transmitted over the communications channel, and one or more resources required to support the desired performance or goal. An example of the first RDPDP parameter is a number of outstanding data packets that must be acknowledged by the receiver before more packets can be sent to the receiver. Another RDPDP parameter example is delay. Such a delay could be an acknowledgement delay denoting a time period between the transmission of a data packet and its acknowledgement. Alternatively, the delay could be a retransmission delay denoting the time period between a transmission and a retransmission (in case of no acknowledgement).
In a preferred, non-limiting example embodiment, first and second parameter values are selected for the desired trade-off Accordingly, a specific number of outstanding data packets and a retransmission delay can be selected to achieve a desired performance, e.g., a desired throughput of data packets, at a particular resource cost.
The value(s) of the first and/or second RDPDP parameters may be determined so that a communication resource is efficiently used in supporting the data packet acknowledgement procedure. Such a communication resource might include one or more of the following: a data processing speed requirement to support the acknowledgement of sent data packets, a buffering requirement to support the acknowledgement of sent data packets, and a power requirement to support the acknowledgement of sent data packets. The value(s) of the first parameter (and the second parameter) may be determined when the packet data communication is established or after the packet data communication is established. Indeed, a parameter value may be modified if some aspect of the packet data communication changes from when the packet data communication was originally established, e.g., a change in service, a change in the configuration or condition of the receiver and/or transmitter. etc.
A smaller number of outstanding packets may be selected, along with a larger delay, in order to reduce buffering requirements and required data processing speed in the receiver. A larger number of outstanding packets may be selected along with a smaller delay to increase the throughput for the packet data communication. A larger number of outstanding packets may be selected along with a larger delay to obtain a higher throughput with a long processing time, but at the cost of larger memory buffers and a higher delay. Because of the flexibility provided by the present invention, a communications device may set its own performance objectives for a particular connection based upon one or more performance requirements or communication resources.
The foregoing and other object, features, and advantages of the present invention may be more readily understood with reference to the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein like reference numerals designate like structural elements, and in which:
FIGS. 3(a) and 3(b) illustrate a sliding window technique,
In the following description, for purposes of explanation and not limitation, specific details are set forth, such as particular embodiments, procedures, techniques, etc., in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. However, it will be apparent to one skilled in the art that the present invention may be practiced in other embodiments that depart from these specific details. For example, the present invention may be implemented in any data communications system between any data sender and data receiver that employs an ARQ communications protocol. Although a specific example is provided below that employs two ARQ parameters, the invention is not limited to these two specific ARQ parameters. Indeed, other ARQ parameters may be used. Nor is the invention limited to a particular number of ARQ parameters. The invention may be implemented using just one ARQ parameter or more than two ARQ parameters.
In some instances, detailed descriptions of well-known methods, interfaces, devices and signaling techniques are omitted so as not to obscure the description of the present invention with unnecessary detail. Moreover, individual function blocks are shown in some of the figures. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the functions may be implemented using individual hardware circuits, using software functioning in conjunction with a suitably programmed digital microprocessor or general purpose computer, using an Application Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC), and/or using one or more Digital Signal Processors (DSPs).
The present invention may be employed in any communications system where data packets are passed between two or more nodes.
One or more ARQ parameters may be used in implementing the invention. In this non-limiting example, two ARQ parameters are employed. Also coupled to controller 5 are blocks 6 and 7 storing the values for ARQ parameter 1 and ARQ parameter 2, respectively. The values of the ARQ parameters may be selected when the communications channel between the sender 1 and the receiver 2 is established, some time after the communication is established, or they may be changed during the communication. The values of the ARQ parameters may be determined to achieve a particular performance, to use a particular communication resource efficiently or sparingly, or to meet some other desired goal.
The receiver 2 includes a buffer 8 for storing received packets from the sender 1 over the communications channel and an error detection block 9 for performing error detection processing on received packets stored in the buffer 8. The buffer 8 and error detection 9 are coupled to a controller 10 which performs a number of data processing and control tasks, including detecting from the error detection block 9 packets which have been received in error or have not been received within a predetermined time interval. The controller 10 is also coupled to one or more ARQ parameter value blocks 11 and 12 which store the values of ARQ parameters that are established for the communication between the sender 1 and the receiver 2. These values correspond to the values stored in blocks 6 and 7 in the sender 1.
The transmitted packets are also stored in the retransmission buffer 4 in the sender 1 until acknowledged. In the third step, the error detection block 9 indicates erroneously received or missing packets to the controller 10 which then sends an acknowledgement signal to the sender for properly received packets taking into account impact of the value of ARQ parameters 1 and/or 2 (if any). Optionally, a negative acknowledgement for packets not properly received may be sent by the receiver 2. Fourth, for those packets not properly acknowledged, the sender 1 retransmits packets stored in the retransmission buffer taking into account the effect of the value of ARQ parameters 1 and/or 2 (if any).
Reference is now made to the flexible ARQ scheme (block 20) shown in diagram format in FIG. 7. Initially, a request is detected to establish a data communication between a sender and a receiver (block 22). A value of a first parameter for a data packet acknowledgement procedure is determined for the data communication based on how one or more communication resources is(are) to be allocated (block 24). For example, the value may be selected to achieve a desired trade-off between performance and required communication resources to support a particular performance. Similar procedures are performed to determine a value of a second parameter for the data packet acknowledgement procedure (block 26). Of course, the present invention is not limited to a particular number of parameters. Indeed, the invention may be implemented with only a single parameter or with two or more parameters.
A decision is made (block 28) if there has been a change that would affect the value of the first or second parameters initially determined. Examples include a service requested by the sender or receiver changes, a performance demand change, etc. If there is no change, a decision is made whether the connection between the sender and receiver has been terminated (block 30). If not, further change monitoring at block 28 continues; otherwise, the routine ends. If there has been a change, e.g., a change in services (such as the sender or receiver desires more or less bandwidth) , the value of the first and/or second parameters may be changed if appropriate or otherwise desired (block 32). After the change of parameter value is implemented, control returns to block 30.
The present invention finds particular (although not limiting) application to a Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS) such as that shown at reference numeral 100 in
Each of the core network service nodes 180 and 200 connects to a UMTS Terrestrial Radio Access Network (UTRAN) 240 that includes one or more Radio Network Controllers (RNCs) 260. Each (RNC is connected to a plurality of Base Stations (BSs) 280 and to other RNCs in the UTRAN 220. Each base station 280 corresponds to one access point (one sector or cell) or includes plural access points. Radio communications between one or more base station access points and a Mobile Terminal (MT) 300 (one type of wireless UE) are by way of a radio interface. A mobile terminal is an example of a wireless user equipment. Radio access in this non-limiting example is based on Wideband-CDMA (W-CDMA) with individual radio channels distinguished using spreading codes. Wideband-CDMA provides wide radio bandwidth for multi-media services including packet data applications that have high data rate/bandwidth requirements. One scenario in which high speed data may need to be transmitted downlink from the UTRAN over the radio interface to a mobile terminal is when the mobile terminal requests information from a computer attached to the Internet, e.g., a website.
The transmitter side receives data packets or blocks to be transmitted to the UE receiver from a higher protocol layer. A packet header may be added (block 520) to include error detection bits in the packet. The data packet from block 520 is stored in a retransmission buffer 540 and also provided to a multiplexer 560. The retransmission buffer 540 stores the packet until it is acknowledged. The output of multiplexer 560, selected by a controller module 500, is provided to a transmission buffer 580. The transmission buffer 580 stores data packets to be transmitted to the receiver until the transmitter is ready to transmit those packets over the communications channel. Packets output from the transmission buffer 580 are processed in a signal processing module 600. Module 600 performs various operations, such as other coding (in addition to any ARQ related coding), modulation, etc., before the coded packets are transmitted to the receiver. If the transmitter/sender is in the RNC, coding, modulation, etc. are not performed in the RNC but rather in the base station access point via which the RNC communicates with the UE. In the access point transmitter, coded packets (rather than the uncoded packets) may be stored in a retransmission buffer 540 if desired. Blocks 520-600 are coordinated by the controller 500 which also stores and uses the value(s) of one or more ARQ parameters for the communication.
On the receiver side, data packets or blocks are initially detected in a signal processing block 680 which performs demodulation, decoding, error detection, etc. functions. Signal processing block 680 detects erroneous packets, e.g., using.CRC bits. Either an acknowledgement message (ACK) or a negative acknowledgement message (NACK), (or some other form of a request to retransmit message), is sent back for each packet to the controller 500 on the transmitter side. If the transmitter controller 500 receives a data packet acknowledgement, that packet is removed from the retransmission buffer 540. If the transmitter controller 500 receives a negative acknowledgement or if a the delay time t expires, the controller 500 selects the particular data packet from the retransmission buffer 540 and routes it via the multiplexer 560 for retransmission to the receiver. This retransmission procedure may repeat until an acknowledgement is received. Alternatively, there may be a limit to the number of retransmissions.
Returning to the receiver side, the signal processing block 680 may optionally store in a receiver buffer 700 those coded packets detected as erroneous. An incorrect packet stored in the buffer 700 may then be “soft combined” with a retransmitted version of the same packet. Such combining or other reconstruction of a packet increases the probability that it will be correctly decoded after retransmission. This procedure is sometimes referred to as Incremental Redundancy (IR) or Hybrid ARQ, and it may be used to make the ARQ scheme more robust.
The decoded, accurately received packets are stored in a receiver buffer 660 and used to ensure that the packets are delivered in the right order, i.e., the order in which they were transmitted. If packets are incorrectly received or not received at all and retransmissions are requested, subsequent packets may arrive before the reception of a correct version of a retransmitted packet. The receiver buffer 660 stores the subsequent packets so that the packets in the sequence can be delivered in the right order. Block 640 removes any header added to the packets, and the packets are delivered to the next protocol layer. Blocks 640-700 are controlled by a receiver controller 620 which also stores and uses the value(s) of one or more ARQ parameters for the communication.
The communication established between the UTRAN and a user equipment terminal 300 in
Retransmission delay may be more optimal because the larger the cell radius, the longer the propagation delay from the transmission of an acknowledgement from the receiver to the reception of the acknowledgement at the transmitter. As a result, there is less time for the transmitter to prepare a retransmission. If retransmission delay is specified, the transmitter can set this parameter depending on the cell radius for example.
A macrocell would have a larger cell radius than a microcell. However, there needs to be an agreement between transmitter and receiver when to expect an acknowledgement; otherwise, confusion may arise as to which packet an acknowledgement belongs.
Two delay parameters, t1 and t2, may also be employed. In this case, t1 could specify when the receiver must transmit an acknowledgement, and t2 could specify when the transmitter should retransmit the packet (if necessary). For example, if t1=5 and t2=7, a packet transmitted in time slot x will be acknowledged in slot x+t1=x+5 and retransmitted (if necessary) in slot x+t2=x+7. Both delay parameters could be negotiated. Or, as mentioned above, one delay parameter could be derived from the other according to some predetermined formula (e.g., t1=t2−2).
The two ARQ parameters n and t in the non-limiting example shown in
During the fifth timeslot, packet 1 is properly acknowledged, so the next packet to be transmitted by the base station to the user equipment terminal corresponding to packet 3 is transmitted. Since an acknowledgement is not received three time intervals after the transmission of packet 2, the base station retransmits packet 2 during time interval seven. After receiving the acknowledgement for packet 3 within three subsequent timeslots, i.e., t=3, a packet 4 is transmitted. When a proper acknowledgement is received in three time slots after the retransmission of packet 2, a next packet 5 is transmitted.
A significant advantage of the present invention is that the value of “n” and/or “t” may be initially selected and changed depending upon the objective(s) and/or condition(s) for the communication. Note that the traditional, single queue, Stop-and-Wait ARQ scheme corresponds to an “n” of 1 and a “t” of any number. The dual queue, Stop-and-Wait scheme may be obtained with an “n” of 2 and a “t” of 1. In a multi-user system, the unused time slots may be used for transmitting data to other users and, therefore, need not be wasted, unless there is only one active user in the system. While in
For example, increasing the value of n and t (where n≦t) increases the throughput at the cost of larger buffers and higher delay. Delay is measured from the time of transmission of a packet until it is decoded in the receiver. The larger the value of t, the longer it takes until the packet is determined to be correctly received. Increasing the value of n and decreasing the value of t achieves a higher throughput and a lower delay at a cost of faster required data processing and greater battery power consumption for the UE. A low n value and a large t value permit smaller buffers, lower power consumption, and reduced processing speed, but at the cost of a lower throughput.
The determined values for ti and t are set, and the ARQ procedures are performed for the connection using those values (block 106). A determination is made in decision block 108 whether there is a need or a desire to change one or both of these values. If not, a decision is made whether the connection between the base station and the user equipment terminal is terminated (block 110). If so, the routine ends; if not, the connection is monitored for any change at block 108. If there is a change, e.g., in desired service or in a condition of the communication, the value of n or t may be changed either separately or together if appropriate or otherwise desired (block 112). A decision is then made if the connection is terminated at block 110 with control proceeding as indicated.
The present invention has a number of advantages. First, the flexible ARQ scheme is simple. No block numbers need be included in the acknowledge message because it is implicitly clear which packet is acknowledged once the values of n and t are established. This simplicity is particularly advantageous in the uplink direction where excessive transmissions should be avoided in order to reduce interference and improve battery life of the user equipment terminal.
Second, the stalling of the buffer queue resulting from a single queue Stop-and-Wait protocol is avoided by permitting an n value to be greater than 1. A stalled queue cannot move onto the next packet until the previous one has been acknowledged. As the name Stop-and-Wait suggests, the queue stops and waits for an acknowledgement before moving on to the next packet.
Third, the receiver can trade off or balance performance, such as data throughput, with one or more communication resources, such as buffering requirements, processing speed, battery consumption, etc. For a receiver with a strict battery power budget, for example, a small buffer size and a long processing time may be established with n=1 and t=large, with the consequence of a lower throughput. A high-end receiver with a small memory may set n=2 and t=1 to obtain a high throughput and low latency, but at the higher cost associated with faster processing. Alternatively, a high-end user equipment terminal can set t=large and n=large to obtain a high throughput with a long processing time, but at the cost of larger memory buffers and a higher latency. In order to allow for the acknowledgement message to reach the transmitter, a larger value of t might be necessary when communicating over large distances, e.g., in a macrocell, as compared to smaller distances, e.g., in a microcell.
Consider a situation where less than n packets are outstanding, for example, only packet 1 is transmitted but not packet 2 as shown in
Although more significant advantages may be obtained in the mobile terminal receiver in the downlink scenario described, the base station transmitter may also perform a similar tradeoff operation. However, the transmitter is typically occupied most if not all the time since there are other users to service. However, depending on the exact implementation of the transmitter, there might be advantages with one set of ARQ parameters compared to another.
Fourth, it is possible to change or renegotiate the ARQ parameters for a particular communication. For example, ARQ parameter values may be switched between a power saving, low throughput mode and a more expensive, fast mode as user requirements. One example occasion when it might be particularly desirable to change parameters is when the mobile terminal is using two or more services at the same time. Assume only a packet data transfer service is initially used with the flexible acknowledgement scheme described above. Later, an additional service that is not a packet-based service, e.g., circuit-switched video, is requested. To support this new service, additional resources are required, e.g., a turbo-decoder. Consequently, there is a decrease in the number of turbo-decoders (and maybe other resources) for the packet data service. The parameters for the flexible acknowledgement scheme may therefore need to be renegotiated to allow for more processing time or a fewer number of outstanding packets to cope with the decrease of available turbo-decoders (and possibly other resources).
Another example when an ARQ parameter adjustment may be desirable is the situation where additional bandwidth becomes available. For example, the network reconfigures the servicing cell or the user is switched to another cell where more of the cell capacity is set aside for packet data support. If the cell sets aside more capacity for packet data, the mobile terminal may want to renegotiate the ARQ parameters to allow for more outstanding packets and thereby take advantage of the additional data capacity provided by the cell. If the packet data bandwidth provided by a servicing cell decreases, the mobile terminal may re-negotiate the ARQ parameters. The re-negotiation may free up some resources or permit a slower processing speed in order to save mobile terminal battery power as there is no need to support high rate data because the cell currently is not offering that service to its full extent. Of course, other situations may arise that favor renegotiation of ARQ parameters.
While the present invention has been described with respect to particular example embodiments, those skilled in the art will recognize that the present invention is not limited to those specific embodiments described and illustrated herein. Different formats, embodiments, adaptations besides those shown and described, as well as many modifications, variations and equivalent arrangements may also be used to implement the invention. Therefore, while the present invention is described in relation to preferred example embodiments, it is to be understood that this disclosure is only illustrative and exemplary of the present invention. Accordingly, it is intended that the invention be limited only by the scope of the claims appended hereto.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US4841526||Nov 19, 1986||Jun 20, 1989||Wilson Jon C||Data communications system|
|US5063562||May 23, 1990||Nov 5, 1991||International Business Machines Corporation||Flow control for high speed networks|
|US5701311||Feb 8, 1996||Dec 23, 1997||Motorola, Inc.||Redundant acknowledgements for packetized data in noisy links and method thereof|
|US5974028||Feb 24, 1997||Oct 26, 1999||At&T Corp.||System and method for improving transport protocol performance in communication networks having lossy links|
|US6205498||Apr 1, 1998||Mar 20, 2001||Microsoft Corporation||Method and system for message transfer session management|
|US6700893 *||Nov 15, 1999||Mar 2, 2004||Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.||System and method for controlling the delay budget of a decoder buffer in a streaming data receiver|
|US6711180 *||May 26, 2000||Mar 23, 2004||France Telecom||Interface device between an ATM equipment and a transmission channel having a synchronous wireless link|
|WO1996036150A1||May 7, 1996||Nov 14, 1996||Nokia Telecommunications Oy||Sliding-window data flow control using an adjustable window size|
|WO2000057594A1||Mar 3, 2000||Sep 28, 2000||Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ)||Data discard mechanism for selective repeat protocol|
|1||1999 IEEE 49<SUP>th </SUP>Vehicular Technology Conference, vol. 3, May 16-20, 1999, pp. 2174-21278, XP002902250, Houston Texas, USA, ISBN: 0-7803-5565-2, Fan et al., "Adaptive timer selective repeat ARQ protocol for dynamic satellite constellations with intersatellite links".|
|2||CDMA/HDR: "A Bandwidth Efficient High Speed Wireless Data Service for Nomadic Users", Paul Bender et al., QUALCOMM, Incorporated, pp. 1-34.|
|3||Douglas E. Comer, Internetworking with TCP/IP, vol. 1, Principles, Protocols, and Architecture, pp. 171-202.|
|4||IEEE International Conference on Communications, vol. 2, May 1-5, 1994, pp. 908-912, XP002902251, New Orleans, LA, USA, ICC'94, SUPERCOMM/ICC'94, Conference Record "Serving Humanity through Communications," Lee et al., "A study on the performance analysis of error control algorithms in digital cellular DS/CDMA systems".|
|5||IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. COM-33, No. 5, May 1985, pp. 385-393, David Chase, "Code Combining-A Maximum-Likelihood Decoding Approach for Combining an Arbitrary Number of Noisy Packets".|
|6||TSG-RAN meeting #7, Madrid, Spain, Mar. 13-15, 2000, RP-000126, "Details of high speed downlink packet access", 5pgs.|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US7020716 *||Aug 31, 2001||Mar 28, 2006||Adaptec, Inc.||Method and system for verifying the hardware implementation of TCP/IP|
|US7076717 *||Jun 13, 2003||Jul 11, 2006||Microsoft Corporation||Time-aware best-effort hole-filling retry method and system for network communications|
|US7106701 *||Jan 2, 2002||Sep 12, 2006||Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ)||End-to-end frame quality classification|
|US7164654 *||Mar 8, 2002||Jan 16, 2007||Denso Corporation||ARQ parameter retransmission control for variable data rate channels|
|US7197050 *||Mar 12, 2002||Mar 27, 2007||Nortel Networks Limited||Unit for transmitting data blocks in acknowledged mode on a channel featuring a radio link with a mobile station|
|US7225384 *||Nov 3, 2003||May 29, 2007||Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.||Method for controlling turbo decoding time in a high-speed packet data communication system|
|US7233590 *||Sep 25, 2001||Jun 19, 2007||Nortel Networks Limited||Switched channel-band network|
|US7239610 *||Jul 18, 2002||Jul 3, 2007||Lucent Technologies Inc.||Methods and devices for partial upper layer frame loss detection based retransmission|
|US7284179 *||Dec 27, 2002||Oct 16, 2007||Innovative Sonic Limited||Window based stall avoidance mechanism for high speed wireless communication system|
|US7292562 *||Jan 13, 2006||Nov 6, 2007||Airmagnet, Inc.||Measuring the throughput of transmissions over wireless local area networks|
|US7369517 *||Feb 7, 2003||May 6, 2008||Siemens Aktiengesellschaft||Method for downloading data in a radio communications system|
|US7370129 *||Dec 15, 2004||May 6, 2008||Microsoft Corporation||Retry strategies for use in a streaming environment|
|US7420950 *||Apr 5, 2004||Sep 2, 2008||Dspg Ltd.||Multiplex communication with slotted retransmission on demand|
|US7436795 *||Dec 9, 2002||Oct 14, 2008||Innovative Sonic Limited||Timer based stall avoidance mechanism for high speed wireless communication system|
|US7450511 *||Apr 9, 2003||Nov 11, 2008||Lg Electronics Inc.||Method and system for polling PDU of radio link control layer|
|US7457260 *||Nov 27, 2001||Nov 25, 2008||Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ)||Transmission control method in a radio access network implementing an automatic repetition request (ARQ) protocol at the base station|
|US7457625 *||Oct 6, 2003||Nov 25, 2008||Texas Instruments Incorporated||Wirelessly-linked, distributed resource control to support wireless communication in non-exclusive spectrum|
|US7519018 *||Feb 27, 2002||Apr 14, 2009||Interdigital Technology Corporation||Method for physical layer automatic repeat request for a subscriber unit|
|US7522560 *||Feb 8, 2002||Apr 21, 2009||Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ)||Method, system and equipment for retransmission in communications systems|
|US7631239 *||Dec 29, 2004||Dec 8, 2009||Electronics And Telecommunications Research Institute||Method for retransmitting packet in mobile communication system and computer-readable medium recorded program thereof|
|US7672265 *||Mar 2, 2010||Interdigital Technology Corporation||Method for physical layer automatic repeat request for a base station|
|US7684329 *||May 6, 2002||Mar 23, 2010||Qualcomm Incorporated||Method and apparatus for augmenting physical layer ARQ in a wireless data communication system|
|US7719991||Jul 14, 2003||May 18, 2010||Qualcomm Incorporated||Reverse rate indicator detection|
|US7764624 *||Jul 18, 2002||Jul 27, 2010||Alcatel-Lucent Usa Inc.||Methods and devices for preventing protocol stalling|
|US7813268||May 5, 2008||Oct 12, 2010||Microsoft Corporation||Retry strategies for use in a streaming environment|
|US7814218||Oct 12, 2010||Astute Networks, Inc.||Multi-protocol and multi-format stateful processing|
|US7853981 *||Dec 14, 2010||Lg Electronics Inc.||Multimedia streaming service system and method|
|US8015303||Aug 2, 2002||Sep 6, 2011||Astute Networks Inc.||High data rate stateful protocol processing|
|US8068473||Feb 7, 2007||Nov 29, 2011||Lg Electronics Inc.||Method for operating enhanced RLC entity and RNC entity for WCDMA and system thereof|
|US8072938||Nov 3, 2006||Dec 6, 2011||Lg Electronics, Inc.||Method for handover in mobile communication system|
|US8081660||Feb 5, 2007||Dec 20, 2011||Lg Electronics, Inc.||Method for requesting radio resource in mobile communications system|
|US8085738||Feb 5, 2007||Dec 27, 2011||Lg Electronics Inc.||Preamble retransmission method in mobile communications system|
|US8090382||Oct 26, 2010||Jan 3, 2012||Lg Electronics Inc.||Allocating radio resources in mobile communication system|
|US8102801||Jan 7, 2010||Jan 24, 2012||Interdigital Technology Corporation||User equipment for physical layer automatic repeat request|
|US8112091 *||Jan 5, 2007||Feb 7, 2012||Lg Electronics Inc.||Allocating radio resources in mobile communications system|
|US8135420||Jan 5, 2007||Mar 13, 2012||Lg Electronics Inc.||Method of transmitting/receiving a paging message in a wireless communication system|
|US8151278||Sep 11, 2008||Apr 3, 2012||Astute Networks, Inc.||System and method for timer management in a stateful protocol processing system|
|US8189537||Jun 15, 2007||May 29, 2012||Lg Electronics Inc.||Method for reconfiguring radio link in wireless communication system|
|US8218573||Jul 10, 2012||Qualcomm Incorporated||Power boosting in a wireless communication system|
|US8234533 *||Jul 31, 2012||At&T Mobility Ii Llc||Data link layer tunneling technique for high-speed data in a noisy wireless environment|
|US8234534||Jun 8, 2007||Jul 31, 2012||Lg Electronics Inc.||Method of supporting data retransmission in a mobile communication system|
|US8238371||Feb 7, 2007||Aug 7, 2012||Lg Electronics Inc.||Method for operating enhanced RLC entity and RNC entity for WCDMA and system thereof|
|US8243665||Jan 30, 2007||Aug 14, 2012||Lg Electronics Inc.||Method for selection and signaling of downlink and uplink bandwidth in wireless networks|
|US8248924||Jun 21, 2007||Aug 21, 2012||Lg Electronics Inc.||Uplink access method of mobile communication system|
|US8340026||Dec 25, 2012||Lg Electronics Inc.||Transmitting data in a mobile communication system|
|US8396020||Jan 4, 2007||Mar 12, 2013||Lg Electronics Inc.||Point-to-multipoint service communication|
|US8407548 *||Mar 26, 2013||At&T Mobility Ii Llc||Data link layer tunneling technique for high-speed data in a noisy wireless environment|
|US8416756||Jul 9, 2012||Apr 9, 2013||Qualcomm Incorporated||Power boosting in a wireless communication system|
|US8428003 *||Apr 23, 2013||Apple Inc.||Method and system for WiMAX R4 auto-discovery and configuration|
|US8428086||Jan 4, 2007||Apr 23, 2013||Lg Electronics Inc.||Transmitting data in a mobile communication system|
|US8429478||Apr 23, 2013||Lg Electronics Inc.||Method of supporting data retransmission in a mobile communication system|
|US8493854||Feb 7, 2007||Jul 23, 2013||Lg Electronics Inc.||Method for avoiding collision using identifier in mobile network|
|US8543080||Mar 24, 2008||Sep 24, 2013||Siemens Aktiengesellschaft||Method of downloading data in a radio communications system|
|US8570956||Jun 21, 2007||Oct 29, 2013||Lg Electronics Inc.||Method of communicating data in a wireless mobile communications system using message separation and mobile terminal for use with the same|
|US8578234 *||Mar 5, 2013||Nov 5, 2013||At&T Mobility Ii Llc||Data link layer tunneling technique for high-speed data in a noisy wireless environment|
|US8630168 *||Feb 17, 2009||Jan 14, 2014||Intel Corporation||Adaptive use of a transmit opportunity|
|US8638707||Jun 21, 2007||Jan 28, 2014||Lg Electronics Inc.||Method for supporting quality of multimedia broadcast multicast service (MBMS) in mobile communications system and terminal thereof|
|US8644250||Jan 5, 2007||Feb 4, 2014||Lg Electronics Inc.||Maintaining communication between mobile terminal and network in mobile communication system|
|US8693334 *||May 11, 2011||Apr 8, 2014||Cisco Technology, Inc.||System and method for improved data transmission reliability over a network|
|US8750217||Jan 4, 2007||Jun 10, 2014||Lg Electronics Inc.||Method for scheduling radio resources in mobile communication system|
|US8867449||Nov 14, 2012||Oct 21, 2014||Lg Electronics Inc.||Transmitting data in a mobile communication system|
|US8971288||Mar 22, 2007||Mar 3, 2015||Lg Electronics Inc.||Method of supporting handover in a wireless communication system|
|US8977188 *||Oct 8, 2010||Mar 10, 2015||Quadrac Co., Ltd.||Radio communication system, transmitting apparatus, receiving apparatus, receiving method and transmitting method|
|US9025449 *||Jun 14, 2013||May 5, 2015||Infineon Technologies Ag||Network retransmission protocols using a proxy node|
|US9036596||Sep 11, 2014||May 19, 2015||Lg Electronics Inc.||Transmitting data in a mobile communication system|
|US9220093||Mar 15, 2013||Dec 22, 2015||Lg Electronics Inc.||Method of supporting data retransmission in a mobile communication system|
|US9253801||Dec 17, 2013||Feb 2, 2016||Lg Electronics Inc.||Maintaining communication between mobile terminal and network in mobile communication system|
|US20020057687 *||Oct 30, 2001||May 16, 2002||Siemens Aktiengesellschaft||High speed interconnection for embedded systems within a computer network|
|US20020150064 *||Mar 12, 2002||Oct 17, 2002||Thierry Lucidarme||Unit for transmitting data blocks in acknowledged mode on a channel featuring a radio link with a mobile station|
|US20020172192 *||Mar 8, 2002||Nov 21, 2002||Denso Corporation||ARQ parameter retransmission control for variable data rate channels|
|US20020186663 *||Jan 2, 2002||Dec 12, 2002||Martin Stumpert||End-to-end frame quality classification|
|US20030007484 *||Sep 25, 2001||Jan 9, 2003||Nortel Networks Limited||Switched channel-band network|
|US20030039219 *||Feb 27, 2002||Feb 27, 2003||Kwak Joseph A.||Method for physical layer automatic repeat request for a subscriber unit|
|US20030039227 *||Feb 27, 2002||Feb 27, 2003||Kwak Joseph A.||Method for physical layer automatic repeat request for a base station|
|US20030046418 *||Aug 31, 2001||Mar 6, 2003||Jignesh Raval||Method and system for verifying the hardware implementation of TCP/IP|
|US20030112821 *||Dec 14, 2001||Jun 19, 2003||Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.||System and method for increasing a data transmission rate in mobile wireless communication channels|
|US20030123403 *||Dec 9, 2002||Jul 3, 2003||Jiang Sam Shiaw-Shiang||Timer based stall avoidance mechanism for high speed wireless communication system|
|US20030125056 *||Dec 27, 2002||Jul 3, 2003||Sam Shiaw-Shiang Jiang||Window based stall avoidance mechanism for high speed wireless communication system|
|US20030161325 *||Apr 10, 2001||Aug 28, 2003||Sami Kekki||Transporting information in a communication system|
|US20030202501 *||Apr 9, 2003||Oct 30, 2003||Lg Electronics Inc.||Method and system for polling PDU of radio link control layer|
|US20030206524 *||May 6, 2002||Nov 6, 2003||Bibhu Mohanty||Method and apparatus for augmenting physical layer ARQ in a wireless data communication system|
|US20040013087 *||Jul 18, 2002||Jan 22, 2004||Hsuan-Jung Su||Methods and devices for preventing protocol stalling|
|US20040013115 *||Jul 18, 2002||Jan 22, 2004||Hsuan-Jung Su||Methods and devices for partial upper layer frame loss detection based retransmission|
|US20040022213 *||Jun 2, 2003||Feb 5, 2004||Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.||Apparatus and method for determining CQI report cycle in an HSDPA communication system|
|US20040024894 *||Aug 2, 2002||Feb 5, 2004||Osman Fazil Ismet||High data rate stateful protocol processing|
|US20040077356 *||Oct 6, 2003||Apr 22, 2004||Krenik William R.||Wirelessly-linked, distributed resource control to support wireless communication in non-exclusive spectrum|
|US20040088641 *||Nov 27, 2001||May 6, 2004||Johan Torsner||Transmission control method in a radio access network implementing an automatic repetition request (aqr) protocol at the base station (aqr)|
|US20040093548 *||Nov 3, 2003||May 13, 2004||Jin-Woo Heo||Method for controlling turbo decoding time in a high-speed packet data communication system|
|US20040141523 *||Jul 14, 2003||Jul 22, 2004||Naga Bhushan||Reverse rate indicator detection|
|US20040141525 *||Jul 14, 2003||Jul 22, 2004||Naga Bhushan||Power boosting in a wireless communication system|
|US20040146033 *||Feb 8, 2002||Jul 29, 2004||Raul Soderstrom||Method, system and equipment for retransmission in communications systems|
|US20040255219 *||Jun 13, 2003||Dec 16, 2004||Microsoft Corporation||Time-aware best-effort hole-filling retry method and system for network communications|
|US20050071491 *||Jun 24, 2004||Mar 31, 2005||Lg Electronics Inc.||Multimedia streaming service system and method|
|US20050083924 *||Feb 7, 2003||Apr 21, 2005||Markus Dillinger||Method for downloading data in a radio communications system|
|US20050094667 *||Nov 15, 2004||May 5, 2005||Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ)||Flexible ARQ for packet data transmission|
|US20050101339 *||Nov 7, 2003||May 12, 2005||Bishop Craig G.||Method and apparatus for recursive audio storage in a communication system|
|US20050111402 *||Feb 13, 2004||May 26, 2005||Manabu Sawada||Radio communication system and communication station|
|US20050224596 *||Jul 6, 2004||Oct 13, 2005||Panopoulos Peter J||Machine that is an automatic pesticide, insecticide, repellant, poison, air freshener, disinfectant or other type of spray delivery system|
|US20050225681 *||Mar 22, 2005||Oct 13, 2005||Young-Wook Sohn||Display apparatus|
|US20050226159 *||Apr 7, 2005||Oct 13, 2005||John Terry||Apparatus, and associated method, for providing a medium access control layer hybrid automatic repeat request scheme for a carrier sense multiple access communication scheme|
|US20050226198 *||Apr 5, 2004||Oct 13, 2005||Barak Ilan S||Multiplex communication with slotted retransmission on demand|
|US20060059399 *||Sep 16, 2004||Mar 16, 2006||Lucent Technologies, Inc.||Determining a number of automatic request retransmissions based on block size|
|US20060072577 *||Sep 28, 2005||Apr 6, 2006||Nokia Corporation||Method for communication over a lossy interface|
|US20060114875 *||Jan 13, 2006||Jun 1, 2006||Airmagnet, Inc.||Measuring the throughput of transmissions over wireless local area networks|
|US20060129723 *||Dec 15, 2004||Jun 15, 2006||Microsoft Corporation||Retry strategies for use in a streaming environment|
|US20060234624 *||Apr 13, 2006||Oct 19, 2006||Chun-Nan Yeh||System and method of dynamic packet transmission for AGPS|
|US20070038834 *||Jul 19, 2006||Feb 15, 2007||Rolf Fritz||Method and System for Managing the Sending of Data Packets Over a Data Path|
|US20070259665 *||Apr 27, 2007||Nov 8, 2007||Chiu Chun-Yuan||Error detection and retransmission methods and devices for communication systems|
|US20070288824 *||Dec 29, 2004||Dec 13, 2007||Kun-Min Yeo||Method For Retransmitting Packet In Mobile Communication System And Computer-Readable Medium Recorded Program Thereof|
|US20080175205 *||Mar 24, 2008||Jul 24, 2008||Siemens Aktiengesellschaft||Method of Downloading Data in a Radio Communications System|
|US20080235553 *||Jun 2, 2008||Sep 25, 2008||At&T Mobility Ii Llc||Data Link Layer Tunneling Technique for High-Speed Data in a Noisy Wireless Environment|
|US20080270866 *||Apr 26, 2007||Oct 30, 2008||Infineon Technologies Ag||Transmission with automatic repeat request process|
|US20080273455 *||May 5, 2008||Nov 6, 2008||Microsoft Corporation||Retry Strategies for Use in a Streaming Environment|
|US20080305819 *||Jan 5, 2007||Dec 11, 2008||Sung-Duck Chun||Allocating Radio Resources in Mobile Communications System|
|US20090016254 *||Jan 4, 2007||Jan 15, 2009||Lee Young-Dae||Point-to-Multipoint Service Communication|
|US20090028125 *||Feb 7, 2007||Jan 29, 2009||Sung-Duck Chun||Method for operating enhanced rlc entity and rnc entity for wcdma and system thereof|
|US20090052391 *||Feb 5, 2007||Feb 26, 2009||Sung-Jun Park||Method for requesting radio resource in mobile communications system|
|US20090129335 *||Nov 3, 2006||May 21, 2009||Young Dae Lee||Method for handover in mobile communication system|
|US20090257407 *||Feb 5, 2007||Oct 15, 2009||Sung-Jun Park||Preamble retransmission method in mobile communications system|
|US20100110991 *||Jan 7, 2010||May 6, 2010||Interdigital Technology Corporation||User equipment for physical layer automatic repeat request|
|US20100115365 *||Oct 23, 2009||May 6, 2010||Industrial Technology Research Institute||System and method for data transmission|
|US20100208579 *||Aug 19, 2010||Intel Corporation||Adaptive use of a transmit opportunity|
|US20110039590 *||Feb 17, 2011||Sung-Jun Park||Allocating radio resources in mobile communication system|
|US20110211451 *||Sep 1, 2011||Mcafee, Inc., A Delaware Corporation||System and method for improved data transmission reliability over a network|
|US20120214407 *||Oct 8, 2010||Aug 23, 2012||Susumu Kusakabe||Radio communication system, transmitting apparatus, receiving apparatus, receiving method and transmitting method|
|US20130283109 *||Jun 14, 2013||Oct 24, 2013||Infineon Technologies Ag||Network Retransmission Protocols Using a Proxy Node|
|US20140105127 *||Jul 15, 2013||Apr 17, 2014||Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.||Communication system with flexible repeat-response mechanism and method of operation thereof|
|US20150229447 *||Apr 20, 2015||Aug 13, 2015||Infineon Technologies Ag||Network retransmission protocols using a proxy node|
|USRE43949||Jan 4, 2007||Jan 29, 2013||Lg Electronics Inc.||Allocating radio resources in mobile communications system|
|WO2014182571A2 *||May 2, 2014||Nov 13, 2014||International Business Machines Corporation||Privacy preserving query method and system for use in federated coalition networks|
|WO2014182571A3 *||May 2, 2014||Jan 22, 2015||International Business Machines Corporation||Privacy preserving query method and system for use in federated coalition networks|
|U.S. Classification||370/236, 370/252, 370/310|
|Cooperative Classification||H04L1/188, H04L1/1803, H04L1/1819, H04L1/187, H04L1/1874|
|European Classification||H04L1/18T1, H04L1/18T3, H04L1/18D2|
|Oct 25, 2000||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL), SWEDEN
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:DAHLMAN, ERIK;PARKVALL, STEFAN;REEL/FRAME:011258/0635
Effective date: 20000821
|Dec 15, 2008||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|Dec 14, 2012||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 8
|Jan 15, 2016||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: HIGHBRIDGE PRINCIPAL STRATEGIES, LLC, NEW YORK
Free format text: SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:WI-FI ONE, LLC;REEL/FRAME:037534/0069
Effective date: 20151230