|Publication number||US6921477 B2|
|Application number||US 10/406,729|
|Publication date||Jul 26, 2005|
|Filing date||Apr 2, 2003|
|Priority date||Apr 8, 2002|
|Also published as||US20030189010, WO2003086575A1|
|Publication number||10406729, 406729, US 6921477 B2, US 6921477B2, US-B2-6921477, US6921477 B2, US6921477B2|
|Inventors||Steven L. Wilhelm|
|Original Assignee||Steven L. Wilhelm|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (19), Non-Patent Citations (1), Referenced by (28), Classifications (17), Legal Events (4)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
This application claims priority from the following co-pending provisional patent application, the content of which is incorporated by reference: IN SITU WATER TREATMENT SYSTEM, Ser. No. 60/371,005, filed Apr. 8, 2002.
Groundwater is often contaminated with undesirable compounds. The contamination typically is the result of waste leaking or leaching into below-ground aquifers. Although many contaminants in water can be removed by passing the water through granular activated carbon, groundwater is generally not treated in this way, because known methods require the groundwater to be pumped above ground level. In many locations, regulations prohibit groundwater that is removed from the aquifer from being re-injected into the aquifer. Thus, water pumped to the surface is lost for groundwater use and becomes a disposal problem.
In situ methods of treating groundwater do not move the water from the aquifer above ground level. The groundwater is treated below ground level, and once treated, remains in the aquifer. One in situ approach that has been suggested involves filling the annular space between the screened portion of a well casing and the well's borehole with granular activated carbon. In this way, the groundwater could flow through the carbon when entering or exiting the well. However, this approach may be impractical. The carbon would effectively be acting as a gravel pack, replacing sand that would normally be placed between the screen and the borehole. This limits the composition of carbon that could be used. Furthermore, once exhausted, the carbon could not easily be replaced with charged carbon. If the carbon was removed, the borehole would almost certainly collapse, making it impractical to place fresh carbon around the well.
Another in situ method of treating groundwater involves using air to strip contaminants from the water. The water is not removed from the aquifer; only the air stream with the contaminants is brought to the surface. The air stream may then be treated to remove the contaminants stripped from the groundwater. Once the air is treated, it may be re-used to remove more contaminants from the groundwater, or released to the atmosphere. Alternatively, the air stream may be released to the atmosphere without treatment. Injection of air may disturb the chemical equilibrium in the groundwater, thus fouling the well with various precipitates and/or biological growths, including iron, manganese, calciferous solids, and iron-fouling bacteria.
A groundwater treatment system is provided, which includes subterranean inlet, treatment, and outlet portions. The inlet portion is configured to collect groundwater from an aquifer. The treatment portion includes a replaceable treatment media and is configured to receive the groundwater from the inlet portion and expose the groundwater to the treatment media. The outlet portion is configured to receive groundwater from the treatment portion and expel the groundwater to the aquifer.
Well casing 14 includes screens 20, which are intervals that allow water to enter or exit the well casing. The screens facilitate the transfer of groundwater between groundwater treatment system 10 and the surrounding aquifer. The screens, which are illustrated schematically in the drawings, are typically slots or other openings that are cut or otherwise formed into the sidewalls of the well casing. In some embodiments, screens may take the form of a wire wrapped around support rods of the well casing. The wire helix may be wrapped so that the spacing between adjacent wire segments corresponds to a desired flow rate and/or level of filtration. For example, wider spacing generally corresponds to greater flow rates, while narrower spacing generally corresponds to increased filtration.
Well casings may include one or more screens depending on the precise configuration of a particular embodiment. When more than one screen is used, at least one of the screens may serve as an inlet screen for collecting groundwater, and at least one of the screens may serve as an outlet screen for returning groundwater to the aquifer.
A well may be tuned to service a particular site based on actual aquifer response. The relative depths from which water is drawn into and released from a well casing may be established by positioning the inlet and outlet screens and/or moving one or more packers to establish the relative size and location of the inlet and outlet portions. Two or more packers, such as packers 40 and 41, may be set to bound a dead portion of the well casing, such as dead portion 43 of
As can be seen in
Well casing 14 laterally defines the outer edge of each of inlet portion 28, outlet portion 30, and treatment portion 44. As described above, the treatment portion may have a relatively large diameter compared to the inlet portion or the outlet portion. Other deviations in casing diameter may also be established. Regardless of the diameter of a particular portion of the well casing, the well casing usually has generally circular horizontal cross sections. However, oval, polygonal, rectilinear, and/or other cross sectional geometries are also within the scope of this disclosure.
While treatment portion 44 of
Groundwater treatment system 10 includes a pumping subsystem 48 that moves groundwater from inlet portion 28 to treatment portion 44. The pumping subsystem may be configured to move groundwater via applied pressure through the treatment media, to the outlet portion, and into the aquifer. In this manner, the pumping system may control the relative pressures at various locations throughout the groundwater treatment system to encourage groundwater to travel through the treatment path of the system. In particular, water at the outlet portion of the well may be over-pressured, or pressured to a level greater than the aquifer. Thus, water at the outlet portion may be forced back into the aquifer at an increased rate. The ability to over-pressure water at the outlet portion of the system provides increased flexibility in tuning a well to a particular treatment site. Pumping subsystem 48 includes a submersible pump 50. As shown, the pumping subsystem also includes an inlet fluid path, or pipe, 51 for directing fluid from pump 50 to treatment portion 44.
Depending on the particular arrangement of treatment, inlet, and outlet portions, groundwater treatment systems according to the present disclosure may include additional and/or alternative plumbing for moving groundwater from one location to another. As exemplified by pump 50 and fluid path 51, the plumbing may be positioned within the well casing. Such internal positioning of the plumbing may reduce the difficulty and cost of installing and maintaining a groundwater treatment system. Because all of the plumbing, and other components, may be internalized within the well casing, the entire system may be fit into a borehole without requiring any lateral digging and/or trenching.
The pumping capacity of the pumps may be selected according to the desired flow rate, well depth, amount of treatment media, lateral extent of the treatment zone around the well, etc. Such pumping parameters may be calculated as described in the following article, the contents of which are incorporated by reference: B. Herrling, J. Stamm, W. Buermann, Hydraulic Circulation System for In Situ Bioremediation and/or In Situ Remediation of Strippable Contamination, in In-Situ Bioreclamation: Applications and Investigations for Hydrocarbon and Contaminated Site Remediation 173 (1991). However, other flow rates may be preferable; for example, flow rates lower than suggested by Herrling et al. may increase the effectiveness of groundwater treatment according to the present disclosure.
Treatment portion 44 includes treatment media 52, which is used to reduce contamination of groundwater. The treatment portion of groundwater treatment systems within the scope of this disclosure may be charged with one or more different types of treatment media, which may be suited for removing various types of contamination. Because the configuration of the disclosed groundwater treatment systems facilitates the replacement of exhausted treatment media with fresh, or at least less exhausted, treatment media, a treatment system may effectively service an area for a much longer period of time than the treatment life of one charge of treatment media. Furthermore, the types and/or amounts of treatment media employed at a given well may be conveniently changed to customize groundwater treatment. Thus, the groundwater treatment systems are highly effective, versatile, and have a relatively long life span.
Treatment media 52 typically includes adsorptive and/or reactive media, which is selected to reduce one or more contaminants from groundwater. An example of an adsorptive media, which has proven particularly effective at treating a wide variety of contaminants is carbon, such as granular activated carbon. However, virtually any adsorptive and/or reactive media may be utilized. In fact, because of the customizable configuration of the treatment portion, virtually any treatment media capable of treating groundwater when groundwater passes through or by the media may be used. Similarly, two or more different types of treatment media may be used in the same system to increase treatment effectiveness.
Treatment media may be used to treat volatile organic compounds, semi-volatile contaminants, metals, ionic contaminants, and explosives. Treatment media may also be used to treat contaminants that would otherwise need to be treated using expensive, complicated, or less effective methods. For example, the disclosed groundwater treatment systems may be used to treat contaminants that are mobilized with surfactants, contaminants that are treated with reactive barriers, and compounds that can be treated with catalyzed reactions. Some of these contaminants may not be effectively treated using prior art in situ methods, such as air stripping. The below table illustrates some of the contaminants that may be treated along with some of the treatment media that may be used to treat such contaminants. It should be understood that the contaminants listed below are nonexclusive examples of treatable contaminants, and the listed treatment media are similarly nonexclusive examples of media that may be used to treat such contaminants.
benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and/or
xylene (BTEX), trichloroethene (TCE),
tetrachloroethene (PCE), 1,1,1
trichloroethane, and carbon tetrachloride
naphthalene, methyl tertiary-butyl ether
(MTBE), and methyl ethyl ketone (MEK)
lead, chromium, cadmium, selenium, and
minerals such as apatite
arsenic, nitrate, sulfate, and perchlorate
reducing medium such as
carbon, zero-valent iron,
(RDX) and Trinitrotoluene (TNT)
PCE, coal, and tar contamination
PCE, and TOE
TCE, PCE, and other chlorinated
palladium catalysis media,
As shown in
As is shown in
Treatment portion 44 includes seals 62 and 64, which may be selectively opened and closed to obtain access to treatment media 52. Seals 62 and 64 are schematically illustrated, and other sealing mechanisms may be used in other embodiments. Seals 62 and 64 may be opened so that exhausted treatment media may be replaced with fresh treatment media. The media may be replaced while the treatment portion of the groundwater treatment system remains below ground level. For example, the treatment portion may be unsealed and the treatment media may be removed by a suitable method, such as a high-powered vacuum. Fresh treatment media may then replace the exhausted media. As described above, the treatment portion may be located near ground level, and may be easily accessed via a manhole, or similar structure. Furthermore, the treatment media may be substantially confined within the treatment portion, so that most treatment media does not enter the lower, or any other, portion of the treatment system. Therefore, treatment media of the system may be referred to as replaceable treatment media, which may be exchanged by emptying and refilling the treatment portion.
Depending on the type or types of treatment media used to treat a particular location and the precise configuration of the treatment portion, treatment media may be loaded in a variety of ways. For example, treatment media may be packaged in cartridges that may be inserted into the treatment portion, or the treatment media may be placed into the treatment portion in the media's natural form. Because the treatment portion is laterally bound by the well casing, when the treatment media is removed, the well does not collapse.
Treatment portion 100 includes a lower entrance 114, through which pumped groundwater may enter lead segment 106 from an inlet portion of a well. The lower entrance may include a screen, a one-way valve, a flow restrictor, or other suitable mechanism for receiving water from below. Shaped bottom 102 may be filled with a collection gravel 116, such as two to three inch drain rock, into which the groundwater may be pumped. As water is pumped through entrance 114, lead segment 106 may fill. The lead treatment segment includes a treatment media 120 for treating groundwater. Because the groundwater fills the lead segment from the bottom up, the treatment media will generally remain submerged, which is advantageous for some varieties of treatment media.
Near the top of the lead segment, an overflow fluid path 122 allows water from the lead segment to move into lag treatment segment 108. As in the lead segment, the lag treatment segment may include a collection gravel 116 in the shaped bottom. Lag treatment segment 108 may be filled with a treatment media 124, which may be of the same or a different variety as treatment media 120. As water moves into the lag portion, treatment media 124 further treats the water. Near the top of the lag portion, a return 126 provides a fluid path from treatment portion 100 to an outlet portion of the well. In other embodiments, additional treatment portions may be included, through which the groundwater may be directed before returning to the outlet portion of the well.
Plumbing may be established between two or more treatment portions so that the various portions receive groundwater in series, parallel, or a combination of series and parallel. As one example,
As herein described and illustrated, groundwater treatment systems may be self-contained treatment facilities capable of independently treating groundwater, although two or more treatment systems may be installed near one another to treat a larger area. The individual groundwater treatment systems may be designed with a relatively linear expression, so that the treatment system may be installed into a borehole. In other words, a straight borehole may be formed at a desired treatment location, and a treatment system may be placed into the borehole. Such an installation provides several advantages over the installation of more complicated treatment systems, which typically require lateral trenching away from the borehole and control stations above ground level. Using the disclosed treatment system, a manhole, or suitable entrance, may provide access to the treatment system without requiring any structure rising above ground level. Because of the substantially linear expression of the system, the manhole need not be substantially larger than the upper portion of the well.
Although the present disclosure has been provided with reference to the foregoing operational principles and embodiments, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various changes in form and detail may be made without departing from the spirit and scope defined in the appended claims. The present disclosure is intended to embrace all such alternatives, modifications and variances that fall within the scope of the appended claims. Where the disclosure or claims recite “a,” “a first,” or “another” element, or the equivalent thereof, they should be interpreted to include one or more such elements, neither requiring nor excluding two or more such elements.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US5082053||Sep 13, 1990||Jan 21, 1992||Ieg Industrie-Engineering Gmbh||Arrangement for cleaning contaminated ground water|
|US5143606||Nov 22, 1991||Sep 1, 1992||Ieg Industrie-Engineering Gmbh||Arrangement for cleaning contaminated ground water|
|US5171104||May 6, 1991||Dec 15, 1992||Ieg Industrie Engineering Gmbh||Arrangement for treating gas from contaminated ground region|
|US5180503||May 10, 1991||Jan 19, 1993||The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University||In-situ vapor stripping for removing volatile organic compounds from groundwater|
|US5281333||Feb 5, 1993||Jan 25, 1994||Ieg Industrie-Engineering Gmbh||Arrangement for cleaning ground water|
|US5380126||May 19, 1993||Jan 10, 1995||Ieg Industrie-Engineering Gmbh||Method of and arrangement for rinsing out impurities from ground|
|US5389267||Dec 18, 1992||Feb 14, 1995||The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University||In-situ vapor stripping for removing volatile organic compounds from groundwater|
|US5402848||Apr 7, 1994||Apr 4, 1995||Kelly; Leo G.||Method and apparatus for conducting environmental procedures|
|US5403491 *||Jul 19, 1993||Apr 4, 1995||Holland; Herbert W.||Monitor well hydrocarbon absorber and solidifier|
|US5426598||Feb 22, 1994||Jun 20, 1995||Nec Corporation||Adder and multiplier circuit employing the same|
|US5547589||Jun 1, 1995||Aug 20, 1996||Carroll, Ii; Paul L.||Water recovery from a septic tank|
|US5622450||Mar 24, 1995||Apr 22, 1997||Grant, Jr.; Richard P.||Pressure extraction process for removing soil and groundwater contaminants|
|US5855775||Nov 25, 1996||Jan 5, 1999||Kerfoot; William B.||Microporous diffusion apparatus|
|US5879108||Jun 9, 1997||Mar 9, 1999||Eder Associates||Air sparging/soil vapor extraction apparatus|
|US5910245||Jan 6, 1997||Jun 8, 1999||Ieg Technologies Corp.||Bioremediation well and method for bioremediation treatment of contaminated water|
|US5944999||Aug 28, 1997||Aug 31, 1999||Nate International||Modular filtration system|
|US6174108||Aug 26, 1998||Jan 16, 2001||Arcadis Geraghty & Miller, Inc.||In-well air stripping and gas adsorption|
|US6312605||Aug 26, 1997||Nov 6, 2001||William B. Kerfoot||Gas-gas-water treatment for groundwater and soil remediation|
|US6533499||Mar 13, 2001||Mar 18, 2003||Boyd Breeding||Soil and groundwater remediation system|
|1||B. Herrling, J. Stamm, W. Buermann, Hydraulic Circulation System for In Situ Bioremdiation and/or In Situ Remediation of Strippable Contamination, in In-Situ Bioreclamation: Applications and Investigations for Hydrocarbon and Contaminated Site Remediation, 173 (1991).|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US7213642 *||Mar 5, 2004||May 8, 2007||Kerfoot William B||Multi-fluid sparging|
|US7431832||Mar 3, 2006||Oct 7, 2008||Sam Houston State University||Systems for reducing water contamination|
|US7442305 *||Aug 17, 2006||Oct 28, 2008||Vitabio, Inc.||Downwash process bioremediation system|
|US7485224||Mar 3, 2006||Feb 3, 2009||Sam Houston State University||Mobile bioremediation systems|
|US7524421||Mar 3, 2006||Apr 28, 2009||Sam Houston State University||Method of forming alginate particles in an aqueous solution containing metal ions|
|US7645380||Oct 27, 2008||Jan 12, 2010||Thinkvillage-Kerfoot, Llc||Microporous diffusion apparatus|
|US7645384||Oct 20, 2008||Jan 12, 2010||Thinkvillage-Kerfoot, Llc||Environmental remediation method using ozonophilic bacteria within a liquid coating of bubbles|
|US7648640||Jul 22, 2008||Jan 19, 2010||Thinkvillage-Kerfoot, Llc||Directional microporous diffuser and directional sparging|
|US7651611||Jul 12, 2006||Jan 26, 2010||Thinkvillage-Kerfoot, Llc||Directional microporous diffuser and directional sparging|
|US7661657||Nov 17, 2008||Feb 16, 2010||Thinkvillage-Kerfoot, Llc||Deep well sparging|
|US7666313||Apr 24, 2006||Feb 23, 2010||Thinkvillage-Kerfoot, Llc||Groundwater and subsurface remediation|
|US7666316||Jun 6, 2005||Feb 23, 2010||Thinkvillage-Kerfoot, Llc||Permanganate-coated ozone for groundwater and soil treatment with in-situ oxidation|
|US8302939||Dec 4, 2009||Nov 6, 2012||Thinkvillage-Kerfoot, Llc||Soil and water remediation system and method|
|US8557110||Jan 15, 2010||Oct 15, 2013||Thinkvillage-Kerfoot, Llc||Groundwater and subsurface remediation|
|US8715503||Nov 8, 2012||May 6, 2014||Sam Houston State University||Method for the remediation of salt-containing wastewater streams|
|US8771507||Aug 3, 2009||Jul 8, 2014||Thinkvillage-Kerfoot, Llc||Directional microporous diffuser and directional sparging|
|US8784660||Nov 8, 2012||Jul 22, 2014||Sam Houston State University||Method for the remediation of water generated from natural resource production operations|
|US8920651||Nov 8, 2012||Dec 30, 2014||Sam Houston University||Bioremediation reactor systems and methods|
|US20050194148 *||Mar 5, 2004||Sep 8, 2005||Kerfoot William B.||Multi-fluid sparging|
|US20060186033 *||Feb 22, 2005||Aug 24, 2006||Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.||Devices and processes for removal of impurities from a fluid recovered from a subterranean environment|
|US20060186050 *||Feb 22, 2005||Aug 24, 2006||Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.||Devices and processes for removal of impurities from a fluid recovered from a subterranean environment|
|US20060186060 *||Apr 24, 2006||Aug 24, 2006||Kerfoot William B||Groundwater and subsurface remediation|
|US20060266712 *||May 26, 2006||Nov 30, 2006||Wilhelm Steven L||Groundwater treatment|
|US20080011474 *||Jul 12, 2006||Jan 17, 2008||Kerfoot William B||Directional microporous diffuser and directional sparging|
|US20080011688 *||Jul 12, 2006||Jan 17, 2008||Kerfoot William B||Directional microporous diffuser and directional sparging|
|US20080290043 *||Jul 22, 2008||Nov 27, 2008||Kerfoot William B||Directional Microporous Diffuser and Directional Sparging|
|US20090039016 *||Oct 20, 2008||Feb 12, 2009||Kerfoot William B||Environmental Remediation Method|
|USRE43350||Jul 30, 2010||May 8, 2012||Think Village-Kerfoot, Llc||Microporous diffusion apparatus|
|U.S. Classification||210/170.07, 166/306, 210/281, 210/284, 166/265, 210/287, 405/128.5, 405/129.25|
|International Classification||B09C1/00, B01D24/02, C02F1/28|
|Cooperative Classification||B09C1/002, C02F1/283, C02F2103/06, B01D24/02|
|European Classification||B01D24/02, B09C1/00B|
|Jan 5, 2009||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|Mar 11, 2013||REMI||Maintenance fee reminder mailed|
|Jul 26, 2013||LAPS||Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees|
|Sep 17, 2013||FP||Expired due to failure to pay maintenance fee|
Effective date: 20130726