|Publication number||US6947723 B1|
|Application number||US 10/322,533|
|Publication date||Sep 20, 2005|
|Filing date||Dec 19, 2002|
|Priority date||Jan 14, 2002|
|Publication number||10322533, 322533, US 6947723 B1, US 6947723B1, US-B1-6947723, US6947723 B1, US6947723B1|
|Inventors||Roger Gurnani, Kevin Patrick Meehan, Christopher James Shunk, Robert Samuel Crouch|
|Original Assignee||Cellco Partnership|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (22), Referenced by (100), Classifications (27), Legal Events (3)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/347,239 entitled “POSTPAY SPENDING LIMIT USING A CELLULAR NETWORK USAGE GOVERNOR” filed Jan. 14, 2002, the disclosure of which is entirely incorporated herein by reference.
The present subject matter relates to a real-time governor or a technique for limiting postpay billing type customer usage of mobile wireless communication services, such as cellular service, personal communication service (PCS) or related messaging and data services.
Modern society offers people many opportunities and in fact places many demands on people to communicate with each other, often over great distances. One of the most common forms of communication involves conversational speech communicated between two or more parties through a telephone network. Modern society also is becoming increasingly mobile. Many new communications services have emerged, to allow people to communicate freely as they roam, without the need for a fixed network connection. These mobile wireless communication services support traditional voice telephone type two-way communications as well as an increasingly diverse array of data services.
In the United States, the customary billing practice for wireless services has been for the carrier providing the wireless service to bill the subscriber on a monthly basis. Typically, the wireless carrier charges a monthly subscription fee plus per-minute fees for telephone communications over-the-air to and from each subscriber's cellular telephone. The monthly subscription fee may include a specified number of minutes of usage time, in which case, the carrier adds charges for minutes over the subscription allotment. A wireless subscriber pays for any such air-time charges, both on outgoing calls and on incoming calls directed to the subscriber's cellular or PCS telephone.
Hence, in a normal mobile telephone type service, call charges are billed to the subscriber associated with the wireless station after disconnection at the end of the call. Such billing after the call is termed “postpay.” If the calling station is a mobile station, the postpay billing charges include air-time charges and may include long distance charges if applicable. If the called station is a mobile station, the subscriber associated with that station would receive a bill including charges for the air-time for participation in the call. If a mobile station is roaming (operating outside its assigned home access territory), in either situation, the postpay bill sent to the subscriber would include roaming charges added-on to compensate the carrier operating the network in the visited territory. Similar postpay billing techniques are being used for newer message or data services, although in some cases, the time units for billing have been replaced with various types of message or packet units.
On a monthly basis, the wireless service provider's automated billing system accumulates and processes billing records to determine a postpay subscriber's billable activity and generate the bill. The billing system generates a paper invoice, which is mailed to the subscriber for payment, although there have been recent efforts to implement electronic billing and payment schemes. Extensive use of mobile wireless services can run-up considerable unit-based usage charges in a relatively short period of time. A subscriber may be unwilling or unable to promptly pay an unexpectedly high monthly bill. This situation is problematic both for subscribers who are disconcerted by the surprisingly high monthly bill and to carriers who have difficulty collecting fees under many such circumstances.
Wireless carriers have tried a number of alternative billing techniques in an effort to address problems with the traditional postpay billing technique. For example, many wireless service providers now offer one or more prepay billing type service plans. A prepaid wireless service requires the calling subscriber to deposit a certain amount of funds into an account, in advance. As the caller uses the wireless service, usage charges are deducted from the account balance. As long as there are funds remaining in the account, the subscriber may continue to use the wireless service.
For example, U.S. Pat. No. 6,058,300 to Hanson discloses a prepay telecommunications system utilizing a prepay call management platform coupled to a telecommunications carrier switch. The prepay call management platform has access to a customer database, which stores prepay customer data. A prepay call is recognized by the mobile identification number of the calling wireless terminal device, and the network routes the call to the prepay call management platform. The platform looks-up the customer account balance associated with the calling device in the customer database and calculates the maximum allowable call duration based on the expected call costs per minute and the customer account balance. The prepay call is then released to the telecommunications carrier switch for completion to the station of the called party. At the same time, the platform starts a call duration timer set to the calculated maximum allowable call duration. The call is disconnected in response to the call duration timer reaching the maximum allowable duration.
Other Examples of techniques for implementing prepaid service for mobile wireless communication customers are disclosed, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 6,185,414 to Brunner et al.; U.S. Pat. No. 6,036,090 to Rahman et al., U.S. Pat. No. 6,029,062 to Hanson; U.S. Pat. No. 5,826,185 to Wise et al.; and U.S. Pat. No. 5,359,182 to Schilling.
Many subscribers are reluctant to move to such a prepay type billing plan for their mobile services. The existing prepay systems have required the subscriber/customer to deposit money in advance. If the customer is unwilling to deposit a substantial sum, then the prepaid service is limited by the very small amount actually deposited. While this limits the exposure of the carrier to bad debt, it may not provide the customer with sufficient service to meet their needs. For these and other reasons, many customers prefer to remain with a postpay type option.
Also, postpay service plans often include a wider array of attractive pricing plans. For example, many service providers offer one-rate plans covering wide geographic areas. Depending on the one monthly rate, the subscriber obtains some relatively large number of minutes for usage throughout the chosen geographic area. The covered usage includes all air-time and long distance for calls to and from points within the chosen geographic area, and within that area, there are no roaming charges. Even for usage over the monthly contract number of minutes, only fixed per minute charges apply within the chosen geographic area. At present, prepaid customers are excluded from one-rate services and many other desirable pricing plans developed for postpay customers.
To provide postpay yet mitigate the impact of overusage during a given billing cycle, some of the wireless carriers have made efforts to develop technologies supporting postpay billing plans that incorporate a usage limit. Each of these limited postpay products was centered around the ability to rapidly collect and apply cellular billing records (Call Detail Records—CDR's, Automatic Message Accounting records—AMA) to the customer's billing account in near real-time.
All such approaches have three major disadvantages. First, cellular switches were not always able to provide timely delivery of the AMA records during heavy phone usage periods, resulting in latencies as long as several hours during which customers might run-up unexpected negative balances. Second, the measurement of the call event using this method depended on detecting the end of the call in order to generate the AMA record, allowing a customer to incur a negative balance as a result of an ongoing call before the system could detect that the customer had exceeded his or her spending limit. Third, customer roaming activity could not be measured and included in real-time, because the Cellular Intercarrier Billing Exchange Roamer Record™ (CIBER Record™) information used to bill cellular roaming activity on other carrier networks would arrive up to 30–60 days after the call was made. All three of these problems resulted in increased financial exposure, resulting in increased bad debt to the wireless service provider, despite the efforts to limit or cap the balance on the postpay account. The roaming issue could be resolved by limiting the customers to local calling areas only, but such a limited service may not be acceptable to many customers.
Hence a need exists for an enhanced technique for providing spending limits on postpay billed services provided to customers by carriers operating mobile wireless communication networks. Such an enhanced solution should address the above-stated needs and overcome the noted deficiencies with prior postpay limiting techniques. For example, such a technique should utilize virtually instantaneous information about forms of usage to allow accurate application of the limit in real-time. Such real-time limiting of usage should take into account any and all charges that may apply to each individual customer's service, including by way of example: air-time charges, long distance charges and roaming charges. Also, the limited postpay solution should be readily adaptable to virtually any postpay pricing plan, such as various one-rate services.
The inventive concepts alleviate the above noted problems with limiting service in the context of a postpay billing plan, for mobile wireless communication subscribers. The inventive techniques allow a wireless service provider to offer a spending limit pricing product for postpay customers, by limiting the spending through the use of a real-time governor similar to the real-time rating systems used on pre-paid type services. Instead of offering a limited prepay plan, however, the carrier offers any or all of its normal postpay pricing plans with a spending limit option.
In the embodiments, the customer's account is allocated a maximum limit for each billing cycle, which serves as the starting point for debiting in response to usage. However, the customer need not deposit specific amounts of money, in advance. The customer's usage is estimated in real-time by a usage governor platform. The customer's account limit is depleted in real-time in response to the estimated usage charges. The customer's bill, however, is calculated through the postpay billing system(s). As the customer makes bill payments, the payments are also added to raise the account limit, allowing the customer to continue usage of their service. If the customer's usage reaches their spending limit (preset amount debited until it goes to zero), then an ongoing call (if any) is terminated mid-call and the customer will not be able to use their mobile wireless service again until a payment is made on their account. The customer receives a bill for actual usage at the end of the billing cycle, in essentially the normal manner. However, because of the use of the governor the bill for each cycle will be near or below the value of the limit, based on actual usage during the cycle.
The full limit is restored upon payment in full on the new postpay bill. The system also can set partially restored limits in response to interim payments or partial payments.
Since the customer does not deposit money in advance, the limited postpay type service does not discourage participation in the same manner as typical prepaid plans. However, this approach does limit the customer's and the carrier's financial exposure, during any given billing cycle, to the amount of the customer established limit. Also, since the carrier processes the usage data through its normal billing systems, the carrier may apply any of its normal postpay pricing plans, for example, any of the one-rate plans offered by the carrier.
Aspects of invention relate to methods of limiting accumulation of billing charges associated with a subscriber's postpay service plan, for a service provided by a wireless communication network. The methods may apply to telephone call-type services or to data sessions or other services offered through the wireless network. Other aspects relate to a network and to systems for implementing the limited postpay service.
Additional objects, advantages and novel features of the embodiments will be set forth in part in the description which follows, and in part will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon examination of the following and the accompanying drawings or may be learned by practice of the invention. The objects and advantages of the inventive concepts may be realized and attained by means of the methodologies, instrumentalities and combinations particularly pointed out in the appended claims.
The drawing figures depict preferred embodiments by way of example, not by way of limitations. In the figures, like reference numerals refer to the same or similar elements.
The various embodiments disclosed herein relate to systems and techniques for implementing a usage limited postpay service, for one or more mobile wireless communication subscribers. The inventive embodiments utilize a governor platform that estimates all appropriate usage charges and applies those charges on a substantially real-time basis against a pre-set spending cap or limit. When the subscriber reaches the limit based on estimated charges, further usage is prohibited, even if the subscriber reaches the limit during an ongoing call or communication session. The actual bill for service, however, is generated in the normal manner after calls made or received during each billing cycle of the postpay service. The subscriber may deposit money or make payments against billed amounts, to reset the limit in the database associated with the governor platform.
Reference now is made in detail to the presently preferred embodiments, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings and discussed below.
The portion of the network 10 that carries customer traffic includes central offices 19 of the landline network, although only one office 19 appears in the drawing, for convenience. The central office 19 may be a service switching point (SSP) connected to the signaling network via SS7 link sets. The central offices 19 connect landline telephone service customers 21 to the telecommunications network 10, in this case, for purposes of making calls to or receiving calls from stations of mobile wireless service subscribers. Although shown as telephone devices, obviously the stations 21 may be any type of device capable of communication via a telephone network. The MTSO 25 may also provide data links to one or more intranets or the Internet (not shown), for data communication sessions.
As noted, the telecommunications network 10 also includes a mobile wireless communication system 13, such as a cellular telephone or PCS system. The wireless system 13 may use any of the known digital and analog technologies for providing voice and/or data services. Those skilled in the art will recognize that the landline and wireless networks may take different forms and provide a vast array of different types of communication services.
In the illustrated implementation, the mobile wireless communication system 13 is further coupled to STP 17 for signaling communication via an SS7 link set. The system 13 also is coupled to one or more central offices 19 of the landline network, via trunk circuits. This arrangement enables the system 13 to provide wireless telecommunications services to and from stations 23 of wireless service customers. For example, to provide cellular telephone type services, the wireless system 13 includes a wireless or cellular switch in a mobile telecommunications switching office (MTSO) 25. Although only one is shown, most systems will include a number of MTSOs or equivalent wireless network switching systems. Each MTSO 25 and the associated base stations (BSs) 27 and cell-site antennas 29 provide mobile wireless services in a local operating territory, forming part of the service area of the mobile service carrier.
For mobile subscribers, the telecommunication network 10 processes calls between wireless customer stations 23 as well as calls between landline stations 21 and the mobile stations 23. Any given mobile station 23 may originate a call or receive a call. Typically the calls are voice or voice-like calls, however, it is envisaged that the communications services may also encompass packet switched data sessions. For ease of discussion, the description herein concentrates on examples of processing a telephone call type service.
In accord with the present teachings, the telecommunication network 10 also includes a usage governor platform 35 coupled to the switch in the MTSO 25. The presently preferred platform 35 is a computerized system interfaced to the switch in the MTSO, having certain call handling, monitoring and rating capabilities, as described below. Alternatively, the usage governor platform 35 may be coupled to or implemented as an application within the MTSO 25 or within the SCP 15. Alternative embodiments may also implement the function of the SCP and/or a usage governor application on an intelligent implementation of the STP 17.
In the presently preferred implementation, the postpay limit processing utilizes AIN processing in accord with the standard TIA ISA826. Appropriate triggers are set in the MTSO 25 to query the SCP 15 and route all incoming and outgoing calls for the subscribers of the spending limit service to the usage governor platform 35. The implementation may utilize a Lucent SurePay™ system as the usage governor platform 35. The usage governor platform 35 implements or has access to a database 37 of data records for wireless customers that subscribe to the limited postpay service.
Using information from customer records in the database 37, the usage governor platform 35 rates and limits all local and roaming calls for the service subscribers in real-time, eliminating the delivery latency issues associated with using AMA or CIBER records. The platform 35 also provides “mid-call teardown”, which will terminate a call as soon as the balance reaches the spending limit.
More specifically, when it receives a call, the usage governor platform 35 accesses a record in the database 37 associated with a particular mobile station 23 involved in a call that is to be set-up. The platform obtains the remaining maximum limit balance for the account of the subscriber associated with that particular station 23. The usage governor platform 35 processes data regarding the currently requested call, such as data regarding the other party's station 21 or 23 and the current point of operation of the customer's station 23 within the wireless system 13, to estimate all per unit usage charges that should apply to the call. These per unit charges include air-time, and they may include roaming and/or long distance charges. The platform 35 may access other systems to obtain data necessary to complete its estimate calculation, for example long distance rate tables.
Based on the calculated charge estimates, the usage governor platform 35 determines if there is sufficient money left under the balance of the customer's limit to allow for an initial usage interval. If so, then the usage governor platform 35 calculates a maximum duration for the particular call, at which the remaining limit balance would be completely or at least substantially expended. The usage governor platform 35 then instructs the switch in the MTSO 25 to complete the call and starts a timer. When the switch completes the call to the station 23 or from the station 23 to a called destination 21 (or another mobile station 23), the MTSO 25 makes a normal entry for postpay billing purposes, for example an initial AMA record.
During the ongoing call, the usage governor platform 35 monitors the timer. If the call reaches the calculated maximum duration, the usage governor platform 35 instructs the switch in the MTSO 24 to interrupt the call. If the call terminates before expiration of the calculated maximum duration, the usage governor platform 35 receives notice from the MTSO 24. In response, the platform 35 estimates the total of all time-based usage charges for the completed call. The usage governor platform 35 deducts the total for those charges from the remaining maximum limit balance for the account of the subscriber and updates the subscriber's record in the database 37 with the resultant new maximum limit balance. If the new balance is zero or less than some arbitrary minimum, the usage governor platform 35 may prohibit further calls for the mobile subscriber until the subscriber makes a further payment. In either case, the MTSO 25 makes a normal end-of-call record for billing purposes, for example on its AMA journal.
As shown by this discussion, the usage governor platform 35 monitors and controls each call in real-time, based on estimates of actual usage charges. However, that platform is not involved in actual payment, and the service does not necessarily require prepayments by the subscribers. The customer's bill is subsequently calculated through the postpay billing system(s) from the records generated by the MTSO 25 and any other network elements involved in generating call billing records (e.g. for long distance or roaming charges), in the same manner as for other postpay customers. The postpay bill processing may apply any service plan offered by the carrier. As the customer makes bill payments, the payments are also added to reset or bump up the usage limit value in the account record stored in database 37, allowing the customer to continue usage of their service.
During any billing cycle, the customer's account is allocated a maximum limit, which serves as the starting point for debiting in response to usage. If the customer's account is up to date, the limit will be the agreed maximum. However, if any or all of the previous billed amount remains unpaid, the maximum is effectively decreased by the unpaid amount.
In this method, the customer's usage is estimated in real-time by the governor platform. The customer's account limit is depleted in real-time in response to the estimated usage. If the customer's usage reaches their spending limit (preset amount debited until it goes to zero), then any ongoing call is terminated mid-call and the customer will not be able to use their mobile wireless service again until a payment is made on their account.
This spending limit for the postpay service is provisioned on the usage governor database 37, with the same rates and usage footprint as defined for the postpay billing plan. The customer is given a spending limit balance in the usage governor. The customer is provisioned on the cellular switch in the MTSO 25 so that the switch will communicate with the usage governor platform 35 when the customer uses their cellular service. As the customer uses their service, the usage governor platform 35 decrements their account balance as recorded in the usage governor database 37. However, as the customer pays their monthly bill, their payment is also transmitted to the usage governor database 37, thereby increasing their account balance. If a customer attempts to use more cellular service than provided for in their spending limit, their service is temporarily disabled by the usage governor platform 35 until they make a payment on their account. A customer who uses their service according to the spending limit but fails to make a payment will also be temporarily disabled by the usage governor until they make a payment on their account. In this manner, the governor limits the amount that the customer can run-up the bill during any billing cycle and limits the carrier's exposure to bad debt.
By using a real-time rating system as a usage governor, spending limit type customers are treated like other postpay customer yet can not run-up undue charges. Such customers are sold the same postpay products, qualify for the same postpay pricing, and are billed and serviced using the same systems as unlimited postpay customers.
The superior performance resulting from use of existing near real-time billing systems is obtained by using a series of cellular network elements (i.e., the governor platform 35 and/or the associated MTSO 24) to estimate local and roaming usage of cellular service in real-time. In addition, the same cellular network elements will shut down the customer's service in real-time when they reach their spending limit, including mid-call teardown. Although the customer usage is measured and governed by the cellular network elements, the customer's bill is still generated using existing postpay billing systems, utilizing the existing business processes to provision, bill, and service the customer. The actual billed amounts may vary somewhat from the estimates used by the platform 35, when actual data is later accumulated and processed to generate the bill. The limit imposed by the platform 35 based on the estimated charges, however, limits the exposure of the carrier to bad debt and limits the impact on the customer of unexpectedly high charges, to within some tolerable percentage error in relation to the actual costs.
The wireless carrier can utilize existing provisioning and billing systems to support the spending-limit type postpay services. The mobile wireless carrier normally operates a number of different administrative information technology (IT) systems in one or more customer service centers.
The billing system, for example, receives usage and operations data from the MTSO switches and other network elements and processes that data to generate bills for individual customers. The accumulated data normally takes the form of call detail records (CDRs) for individual calls, accumulated and parsed from the individual event records, e.g. as produced by AMA processing. The CDRs which may be processed through a mediation system, stored in a repository (operational data store) and supplied to the billing system. The usage governor platform will also provide event detail records (EDRs) to the mediation system for similar processing, storage and forwarding to the billing system.
The MTAS provides provisioning data to provision services for new stations 23 and modifies provisioning data as customers change there subscriptions to obtain different sets of services from the carrier. This provisioning data would include data identifying the subscriber's services as limited postpay services. The provisioning system supplies the data to appropriate nodes of the wireless communication network 13, such as a home location register (HLR) which may reside in the MTSO switch or more likely in the SCP 15. The MTAS also sets the trigger(s), for the services to and from the subscriber's station, in the switch within the MTSO 25.
For purposes of the spending limited postpay services, the MTAS provisioning system also receives certain information regarding customer accounts from the carrier's billing system. Initially, the MTAS receives an agreed spending limit for a new customer account, for example based on an initial security deposit. The MTS provisions the database 37 associated with the governor platform 35 with the limit amount threshold for the new account. The billing system also will notify the MTAS, and the MTAS will provide updates to the database 37, in response to bill payments by the subscriber, to allow the database to increase or reset the customer's limit appropriately.
Those skilled in the art will recognize that the concepts disclosed herein have wide applicability and may admit of a wide range of modifications. For example, a technique such as outlined above could be implemented for serving “disposable phones,” in rental car scenarios, for limited trials or try-before-you-buy service offerings, corporate sponsorship events, for resellers, and for other spending limit scenarios that may arise in mobile communications services. In each case, the customer account is provisioned with a spending limit on the usage governor platform and the responsible party or agent is sent a bill after usage, through the postpay billing systems. As another example, the limited postpay technique could be applied to other fields, where a customer is billed using asynchronous billing methods, but the usage of their service is measured synchronously.
While the foregoing has described what are considered to be the best mode and/or other preferred embodiments, it is understood that various modifications may be made therein and that the invention or inventions disclosed herein may be implemented in various forms and embodiments, and that they may be applied in numerous applications, only some of which have been described herein. It is intended by the following claims to claim any and all modifications and variations that fall within the true scope of the inventive concepts.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US5359182||Oct 6, 1992||Oct 25, 1994||Interdigital Technology Corporation||Wireless telephone debit card system and method|
|US5450477 *||Dec 27, 1993||Sep 12, 1995||At&T Corp.||Monitoring of charges debited to an account having an assigned limit|
|US5517555 *||Sep 21, 1994||May 14, 1996||Cellular Technical Services Company, Inc.||Real time information system for cellular telephones|
|US5615408 *||Oct 19, 1993||Mar 25, 1997||Coral Systems, Inc.||Apparatus and method for credit based management of telecommunication activity|
|US5684861 *||Dec 4, 1995||Nov 4, 1997||Lewis; Walter F.||Apparatus and method for monitoring cellular telephone usage|
|US5749052 *||May 24, 1995||May 5, 1998||Tele Digital Development, Inc.||Cellular telephone management system|
|US5826185||Aug 19, 1996||Oct 20, 1998||Banana Cellular, Inc.||Cellular phone system wherein the air time use is predetermined|
|US5963625 *||Sep 30, 1996||Oct 5, 1999||At&T Corp||Method for providing called service provider control of caller access to pay services|
|US5987108 *||Mar 19, 1997||Nov 16, 1999||At&T Corp||Telephone billing with customer-defined budgeting|
|US6029062||Jul 21, 1997||Feb 22, 2000||National Telemanagement Corporation||Prepay telecommunications system with unregistered roaming call processing|
|US6036090||Jul 17, 1997||Mar 14, 2000||Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson||Automated prepayment method for mobile terminals|
|US6058300||Feb 4, 1997||May 2, 2000||National Telemanagement Corporation||Prepay telecommunications system|
|US6131024||Oct 9, 1997||Oct 10, 2000||Ericsson Inc.||System and method for setting subscriber-defined usage limits on a mobile terminal|
|US6185414||Jul 24, 1998||Feb 6, 2001||Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ)||Wireless telecommunication system with prepaid architecture|
|US6445911 *||Dec 30, 1998||Sep 3, 2002||At&T Corp||Method and apparatus for providing neighborhood cordless services|
|US6470179 *||Dec 30, 1998||Oct 22, 2002||At&T Corp.||Automatic service selection feature for neighborhood residential cordless service|
|US6480591 *||Mar 1, 2000||Nov 12, 2002||Priority Call Management, Inc.||Real-time call rating and debiting system and method for multiple calls|
|US6546253 *||Dec 30, 1998||Apr 8, 2003||At&T Corp.||Neighborhood cordless service call handoff|
|US6577857 *||Apr 29, 1999||Jun 10, 2003||Emerald Isle, Llc||Portable communication unit with discrete allocable blocks of airtime|
|US6587877 *||Mar 25, 1997||Jul 1, 2003||Lucent Technologies Inc.||Management of time and expense when communicating between a host and a communication network|
|US6735290 *||Sep 28, 2001||May 11, 2004||Bellsouth Intellectual Property Corporation||Method and system for pre-setting long distance call charges|
|US6813497 *||Jan 30, 2001||Nov 2, 2004||Leap Wirelesss International||Method for providing wireless communication services and network and system for delivering same|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US7068996 *||Apr 14, 2004||Jun 27, 2006||Sprint Spectrum L.P.||Banded billing system for telecommunication service|
|US7299283||Jun 27, 2006||Nov 20, 2007||At&T Corp.||Apparatus for size-dependent sampling for managing a data network|
|US7450928||Jan 9, 2004||Nov 11, 2008||At&T Mobility Ii Llc||Methods for providing overdraft protection for post-paid communication service plans|
|US7457609||Oct 28, 2005||Nov 25, 2008||Lucent Technologies Inc.||Methods and systems for controlling services provided to shared plan subscribers|
|US7463878 *||Dec 30, 2004||Dec 9, 2008||Megasoft Consultants, Inc.||Real-time interconnect billing system and method of use|
|US7536455||Jul 18, 2006||May 19, 2009||At&T Corp.||Optimal combination of sampled measurements|
|US7603102||Jun 29, 2004||Oct 13, 2009||Sprint Spectrum L.P.||Banded billing system for data communication service|
|US7603103||Apr 19, 2006||Oct 13, 2009||Sprint Spectrum L.P.||Banded billing and associated invoice generation for communication service|
|US7650138||Jul 7, 2004||Jan 19, 2010||At&T Mobility Ii Llc||Methods for providing overdraft protection for post-paid communication service plans|
|US7684804 *||Aug 28, 2006||Mar 23, 2010||Cricket Communications, Inc.||Method for providing wireless communication services and network and system for delivering same|
|US7801815 *||Oct 23, 2009||Sep 21, 2010||Accenture Global Services Gmbh||Reverse rating system for determining duration of a usage transaction|
|US7912001 *||Apr 7, 2005||Mar 22, 2011||At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P.||Methods, systems, and products for a metering application|
|US7945240 *||May 12, 2006||May 17, 2011||At&T Mobility Ii Llc||Mobile communications billing architecture|
|US7987512 *||May 19, 2006||Jul 26, 2011||Microsoft Corporation||BIOS based secure execution environment|
|US8010080 *||Jul 25, 2005||Aug 30, 2011||Sprint Spectrum L.P.||Predictive payment suggestion in a telecommunication system|
|US8028055||Nov 17, 2008||Sep 27, 2011||At&T Intellectual Property Ii, L.P.||Optimal combination of sampled measurements|
|US8095111||Dec 30, 2009||Jan 10, 2012||At&T Mobility Ii Llc||Methods for providing overdraft protection for post-paid communication service plans|
|US8402111||Jan 27, 2010||Mar 19, 2013||Headwater Partners I, Llc||Device assisted services install|
|US8406748||Mar 26, 2013||Headwater Partners I Llc||Adaptive ambient services|
|US8437271||Apr 9, 2012||May 7, 2013||Headwater Partners I Llc||Verifiable and accurate service usage monitoring for intermediate networking devices|
|US8441989||Jul 20, 2012||May 14, 2013||Headwater Partners I Llc||Open transaction central billing system|
|US8467312||Jun 18, 2013||Headwater Partners I Llc||Verifiable and accurate service usage monitoring for intermediate networking devices|
|US8472598||Mar 14, 2007||Jun 25, 2013||Motorola Mobility Llc||Prepaying usage time for another communication device|
|US8478235||Nov 30, 2011||Jul 2, 2013||At&T Mobility Ii Llc||Methods for providing overdraft protection for post-paid communication service plans|
|US8478667||Apr 25, 2012||Jul 2, 2013||Headwater Partners I Llc||Automated device provisioning and activation|
|US8516552||Apr 4, 2012||Aug 20, 2013||Headwater Partners I Llc||Verifiable service policy implementation for intermediate networking devices|
|US8527630||Aug 23, 2012||Sep 3, 2013||Headwater Partners I Llc||Adaptive ambient services|
|US8531986||Apr 10, 2012||Sep 10, 2013||Headwater Partners I Llc||Network tools for analysis, design, testing, and production of services|
|US8547872||Apr 12, 2012||Oct 1, 2013||Headwater Partners I Llc||Verifiable and accurate service usage monitoring for intermediate networking devices|
|US8548428||Jan 27, 2010||Oct 1, 2013||Headwater Partners I Llc||Device group partitions and settlement platform|
|US8570908||Apr 25, 2013||Oct 29, 2013||Headwater Partners I Llc||Automated device provisioning and activation|
|US8583781||Mar 2, 2009||Nov 12, 2013||Headwater Partners I Llc||Simplified service network architecture|
|US8588110||Sep 13, 2012||Nov 19, 2013||Headwater Partners I Llc||Verifiable device assisted service usage billing with integrated accounting, mediation accounting, and multi-account|
|US8589541||May 25, 2011||Nov 19, 2013||Headwater Partners I Llc||Device-assisted services for protecting network capacity|
|US8599779 *||Feb 17, 2011||Dec 3, 2013||At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P.||Methods, systems, and products for a metering application|
|US8606911||Jan 24, 2012||Dec 10, 2013||Headwater Partners I Llc||Flow tagging for service policy implementation|
|US8626113 *||Mar 24, 2006||Jan 7, 2014||Nokia Corporation||Providing communication service sessions|
|US8626115||Sep 9, 2011||Jan 7, 2014||Headwater Partners I Llc||Wireless network service interfaces|
|US8630192||Mar 2, 2009||Jan 14, 2014||Headwater Partners I Llc||Verifiable and accurate service usage monitoring for intermediate networking devices|
|US8630611||Nov 15, 2012||Jan 14, 2014||Headwater Partners I Llc||Automated device provisioning and activation|
|US8630617||Oct 19, 2012||Jan 14, 2014||Headwater Partners I Llc||Device group partitions and settlement platform|
|US8630630||Dec 18, 2012||Jan 14, 2014||Headwater Partners I Llc||Enhanced roaming services and converged carrier networks with device assisted services and a proxy|
|US8631102||Nov 15, 2012||Jan 14, 2014||Headwater Partners I Llc||Automated device provisioning and activation|
|US8634805||Aug 2, 2012||Jan 21, 2014||Headwater Partners I Llc||Device assisted CDR creation aggregation, mediation and billing|
|US8634821||Nov 12, 2012||Jan 21, 2014||Headwater Partners I Llc||Device assisted services install|
|US8635335||May 25, 2011||Jan 21, 2014||Headwater Partners I Llc||System and method for wireless network offloading|
|US8635678||Mar 28, 2013||Jan 21, 2014||Headwater Partners I Llc||Automated device provisioning and activation|
|US8639811||Jan 15, 2013||Jan 28, 2014||Headwater Partners I Llc||Automated device provisioning and activation|
|US8639935||Dec 12, 2012||Jan 28, 2014||Headwater Partners I Llc||Automated device provisioning and activation|
|US8640198||Jan 15, 2013||Jan 28, 2014||Headwater Partners I Llc||Automated device provisioning and activation|
|US8666364||Sep 13, 2012||Mar 4, 2014||Headwater Partners I Llc||Verifiable device assisted service usage billing with integrated accounting, mediation accounting, and multi-account|
|US8667571||Dec 4, 2012||Mar 4, 2014||Headwater Partners I Llc||Automated device provisioning and activation|
|US8675507||Mar 2, 2009||Mar 18, 2014||Headwater Partners I Llc||Service profile management with user preference, adaptive policy, network neutrality and user privacy for intermediate networking devices|
|US8688099||Sep 13, 2012||Apr 1, 2014||Headwater Partners I Llc||Open development system for access service providers|
|US8695073||Apr 19, 2013||Apr 8, 2014||Headwater Partners I Llc||Automated device provisioning and activation|
|US8713630||Apr 12, 2012||Apr 29, 2014||Headwater Partners I Llc||Verifiable service policy implementation for intermediate networking devices|
|US8724554||Mar 19, 2013||May 13, 2014||Headwater Partners I Llc||Open transaction central billing system|
|US8725123||Sep 28, 2011||May 13, 2014||Headwater Partners I Llc||Communications device with secure data path processing agents|
|US8737957||Apr 22, 2013||May 27, 2014||Headwater Partners I Llc||Automated device provisioning and activation|
|US8745191 *||Oct 4, 2011||Jun 3, 2014||Headwater Partners I Llc||System and method for providing user notifications|
|US8745220||Jul 12, 2013||Jun 3, 2014||Headwater Partners I Llc||System and method for providing user notifications|
|US8788661||Jan 20, 2014||Jul 22, 2014||Headwater Partners I Llc||Device assisted CDR creation, aggregation, mediation and billing|
|US8793758||Dec 1, 2011||Jul 29, 2014||Headwater Partners I Llc||Security, fraud detection, and fraud mitigation in device-assisted services systems|
|US8797908||May 16, 2013||Aug 5, 2014||Headwater Partners I Llc||Automated device provisioning and activation|
|US8799451||Mar 2, 2009||Aug 5, 2014||Headwater Partners I Llc||Verifiable service policy implementation for intermediate networking devices|
|US8832777||Sep 20, 2011||Sep 9, 2014||Headwater Partners I Llc||Adapting network policies based on device service processor configuration|
|US8839387||Mar 2, 2009||Sep 16, 2014||Headwater Partners I Llc||Roaming services network and overlay networks|
|US8839388||Mar 2, 2009||Sep 16, 2014||Headwater Partners I Llc||Automated device provisioning and activation|
|US8856020 *||Feb 23, 2010||Oct 7, 2014||Telefonica, S.A.||Method for optimizing the consumption of a telecommunications service|
|US8868455||Aug 17, 2012||Oct 21, 2014||Headwater Partners I Llc||Adaptive ambient services|
|US8886162||Jan 9, 2014||Nov 11, 2014||Headwater Partners I Llc||Restricting end-user device communications over a wireless access network associated with a cost|
|US8893009||Dec 1, 2011||Nov 18, 2014||Headwater Partners I Llc||End user device that secures an association of application to service policy with an application certificate check|
|US8897743||Dec 20, 2011||Nov 25, 2014||Headwater Partners I Llc||Verifiable device assisted service usage billing with integrated accounting, mediation accounting, and multi-account|
|US8897744||Oct 2, 2012||Nov 25, 2014||Headwater Partners I Llc||Device assisted ambient services|
|US8898079||Sep 13, 2012||Nov 25, 2014||Headwater Partners I Llc||Network based ambient services|
|US8898293||Sep 21, 2011||Nov 25, 2014||Headwater Partners I Llc||Service offer set publishing to device agent with on-device service selection|
|US8903356||Jun 14, 2006||Dec 2, 2014||Sprint Spectrum L.P.||Method and system for suggesting individual payments for a common billing account|
|US8903452||Oct 2, 2012||Dec 2, 2014||Headwater Partners I Llc||Device assisted ambient services|
|US8918077||Jun 27, 2013||Dec 23, 2014||At&T Mobility Ii Llc||Methods for providing overdraft protection for post-paid communication service plans|
|US8924469||Sep 28, 2011||Dec 30, 2014||Headwater Partners I Llc||Enterprise access control and accounting allocation for access networks|
|US8924543||Sep 28, 2011||Dec 30, 2014||Headwater Partners I Llc||Service design center for device assisted services|
|US8924549||Aug 20, 2012||Dec 30, 2014||Headwater Partners I Llc||Network based ambient services|
|US8929858||Apr 14, 2006||Jan 6, 2015||Sprint Spectrum L.P.||Banded billing system for telecommunication service|
|US8948025||Apr 18, 2014||Feb 3, 2015||Headwater Partners I Llc||Remotely configurable device agent for packet routing|
|US9014026||Feb 7, 2012||Apr 21, 2015||Headwater Partners I Llc||Network based service profile management with user preference, adaptive policy, network neutrality, and user privacy|
|US9026079||Jan 3, 2014||May 5, 2015||Headwater Partners I Llc||Wireless network service interfaces|
|US9037127||Apr 28, 2014||May 19, 2015||Headwater Partners I Llc||Device agent for remote user configuration of wireless network access|
|US9043455||Apr 6, 2011||May 26, 2015||Cellco Partnership||Universal data remote|
|US9094311||Jul 23, 2014||Jul 28, 2015||Headwater Partners I, Llc||Techniques for attribution of mobile device data traffic to initiating end-user application|
|US20050181796 *||Dec 30, 2004||Aug 18, 2005||G.V. Kumar||Real-time interconnect billing system and method of use|
|US20050198682 *||Apr 7, 2005||Sep 8, 2005||Steven Wright||Methods, systems, and products for a metering application|
|US20060009243 *||Sep 10, 2004||Jan 12, 2006||At&T Wireless Services, Inc.||Always-on mobile instant messaging of a messaging centric wireless device|
|US20060019632 *||Sep 14, 2004||Jan 26, 2006||At&T Wireless Services, Inc.||Dedicated wireless device business method|
|US20070136195 *||Mar 24, 2006||Jun 14, 2007||Nokia Corporation||Providing communication service sessions|
|US20110134755 *||Jun 9, 2011||At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P.||Methods, Systems, and Products for a Metering Application|
|US20110207430 *||Aug 25, 2011||Telefonica, S.A.||Method for optimizing the consumption of a telecommunications service|
|US20120101952 *||Oct 4, 2011||Apr 26, 2012||Raleigh Gregory G||System and Method for Providing User Notifications|
|US20140179267 *||Dec 13, 2013||Jun 26, 2014||Intel Corporation||Operations method for providing wireless communication services|
|WO2006132901A1 *||Jun 1, 2006||Dec 14, 2006||Cingular Wireless Ii Llc||System and method for providing airtime overdraft protection|
|WO2013044065A1 *||Sep 21, 2012||Mar 28, 2013||Cellco Partnership D/B/A Verizon Wireless||Alternative data plans|
|U.S. Classification||455/406, 379/114.09, 379/121.02, 379/114.17, 455/408, 379/114.01|
|International Classification||H04M15/00, H04M11/00|
|Cooperative Classification||H04M15/59, H04M15/00, H04M15/43, H04W4/24, H04M15/88, H04M2215/0116, H04M15/90, H04M2215/32, H04M2215/0152, H04M2215/2026, H04M15/80, H04M2215/016|
|European Classification||H04M15/90, H04M15/59, H04W4/24, H04M15/43, H04M15/88, H04M15/80, H04M15/00|
|Dec 19, 2002||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: CELLCO PARTNERSHIP (D/B/A VERIZON WIRELESS), NEW J
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:GURNANI, ROGER;MEEHAN, KEVIN PATRICK;SHUNK, CHRISTOPHER JAMES;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:013598/0121;SIGNING DATES FROM 20021204 TO 20021209
|Mar 20, 2009||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|Feb 20, 2013||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 8