|Publication number||US7020537 B2|
|Application number||US 09/849,505|
|Publication date||Mar 28, 2006|
|Filing date||May 4, 2001|
|Priority date||Apr 13, 1999|
|Also published as||EP1295312A2, EP1295312A4, US20020032499, US20070034516, US20070221502, WO2001091163A2, WO2001091163A3|
|Publication number||09849505, 849505, US 7020537 B2, US 7020537B2, US-B2-7020537, US7020537 B2, US7020537B2|
|Inventors||Gregory J. Wilson, Paul R. McHugh, Robert A. Weaver, Thomas L. Ritzdorf|
|Original Assignee||Semitool, Inc.|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (104), Non-Patent Citations (29), Referenced by (10), Classifications (39), Legal Events (7)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
The present application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/206,663, filed May 24, 2000, and is a continuation-in-part of International Patent Application No. PCT/US00/10120, filed Apr. 13, 2000, designating the United States and claiming the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Nos. 60/182,160, filed Feb. 14, 2000; 60/143,769, filed Jul. 12, 1999; and 60/129,055, filed Apr. 13, 1999, the disclosures of each of which are hereby expressly incorporated by reference in their entireties.
The present invention is directed to the field of automatic process control, and, more particularly, to the field of controlling a material deposition process.
The fabrication of microelectronic components from a microelectronic workpiece, such as a semiconductor wafer substrate, polymer substrate, etc., involves a substantial number of processes. For purposes of the present application, a microelectronic workpiece is defined to include a workpiece formed from a substrate upon which microelectronic circuits or components, data storage elements or layers, and/or micro-mechanical elements are formed. There are a number of different processing operations performed on the microelectronic workpiece to fabricate the microelectronic component(s). Such operations include, for example, material deposition, patterning, doping, chemical mechanical polishing, electropolishing, and heat treatment.
Material deposition processing involves depositing or otherwise forming thin layers of material on the surface of the microelectronic workpiece. Patterning provides selective deposition of a thin layer and/or removal of selected portions of these added layers. Doping of the semiconductor wafer, or similar microelectronic workpiece, is the process of adding impurities known as “dopants” to selected portions of the wafer to alter the electrical characteristics of the substrate material. Heat treatment of the microelectronic workpiece involves heating and/or cooling the workpiece to achieve specific process results. Chemical mechanical polishing involves the removal of material through a combined chemical/mechanical process while electropolishing involves the removal of material from a workpiece surface using electrochemical reactions.
Numerous processing devices, known as processing “tools,” have been developed to implement one or more of the foregoing processing operations. These tools take on different configurations depending on the type of workpiece used in the fabrication process and the process or processes executed by the tool. One tool configuration, known as the LT-210C™ processing tool and available from Semitool, Inc., of Kalispell, Mont., includes a plurality of microelectronic workpiece processing stations that are serviced by one or more workpiece transfer robots. Several of the workpiece processing stations utilize a workpiece holder and a process bowl or container for implementing wet processing operations. Such wet processing operations include electroplating, etching, cleaning, electroless deposition, electropolishing, etc. In connection with the present invention, it is the electrochemical processing stations used in the LT-210C™ that are noteworthy. Such electrochemical processing stations perform the foregoing electroplating, electropolishing, anodization, etc., of the microelectronic workpiece. It will be recognized that the electrochemical processing system set forth herein is readily adapted to implement each of the foregoing electrochemical processes.
In accordance with one configuration of the LT-210C™ tool, the electrochemical processing stations include a workpiece holder and a process container that are disposed proximate one another. The workpiece holder and process container are operated to bring the microelectronic workpiece held by the workpiece holder into contact with an electrochemical processing fluid disposed in the process container. When the microelectronic workpiece is positioned in this manner, the workpiece holder and process container form a processing chamber that may be open, enclosed, or substantially enclosed.
Electroplating and other electrochemical processes have become important in the production of semiconductor integrated circuits and other microelectronic devices from microelectronic workpieces. For example, electroplating is often used in the formation of one or more metal layers on the workpiece. These metal layers are often used to electrically interconnect the various devices of the integrated circuit. Further, the structures formed from the metal layers may constitute microelectronic devices such as read/write heads, etc.
Electroplated metals typically include copper, nickel, gold, platinum, solder, nickel-iron, etc. Electroplating is generally effected by initial formation of a seed layer on the microelectronic workpiece in the form of a very thin layer of metal, whereby the surface of the microelectronic workpiece is rendered electrically conductive. This electro-conductivity permits subsequent formation of a blanket or patterned layer of the desired metal by electroplating. Subsequent processing, such as chemical mechanical planarization, may be used to remove unwanted portions of the patterned or metal blanket layer formed during electroplating, resulting in the formation of the desired metallized structure.
Electropolishing of metals at the surface of a workpiece involves the removal of at least some of the metal using an electrochemical process. The electrochemical process is effectively the reverse of the electroplating reaction and is often carried out using the same or similar reactors as electroplating.
Anodization typically involves oxidizing a thin-film layer at the surface of the workpiece. For example, it may be desirable to selectively oxidize certain portions of a metal layer, such as a Cu layer, to facilitate subsequent removal of the selected portions in a solution that etches the oxidized material faster than the non-oxidized material. Further, anodization may be used to deposit certain materials, such as perovskite materials, onto the surface of the workpiece.
As the size of various microelectronic circuits and components decreases, there is a corresponding decrease in the manufacturing tolerances that must be met by the manufacturing tools. In connection with the present invention as described below, electrochemical processes must uniformly process the surface of a given microelectronic workpiece. Further, the electrochemical process must meet workpiece-to-workpiece uniformity requirements.
To meet such uniformity requirements, an array of multiple electrodes may be used as the anode or cathode for a given electrochemical process. In each of these electrode arrays, a plurality of electrodes are arranged in a generally optimized pattern corresponding to the shape of the particular microelectronic workpiece that is to be processed. Each of the electrodes is connected to an electrical power supply that provides the electrical power used to execute the electrochemical processing operations. Preferably, at least some of the electrodes are connected to different electrical nodes so lo that the electrical power provided to them by the power supply may be provided independent of the electrical power provided to other electrodes in the array.
Electrode arrays having a plurality of electrodes facilitate localized control of the electrical parameters used to electrochemically process the microelectronic workpiece. This localized control of the electrical parameters can be used to provide greater uniformity of the electrochemical processing across the surface of the microelectronic workpiece when compared to single electrode systems. However, determining the electrical parameters for each of the electrodes in the array to achieve the desired process uniformity can be problematic. Typically, the electrical parameter (i.e., electrical current, voltage, etc.) for a given electrode in a given electrochemical process is determined experimentally using a manual trial and error approach. Using such a manual trial and error approach, however, can be very time-consuming. Further, the electrical parameters do not easily translate to other electrochemical processes. For example, a given set of electrical parameters used to electroplate a metal to a thickness X onto the surface of a microelectronic workpiece cannot easily be used to derive the electrical parameters used to electroplate a metal to a thickness Y. Still further, the electrical parameters used to electroplate a desired film thickness X of a given metal (e.g., copper) are generally not suitable for use in electroplating another metal (e.g., platinum). Similar deficiencies in this trial and error approach are associated with other types of electrochemical processes (i.e., anodization, electropolishing, etc.). Also, this manual trial and error approach often must be repeated in several common circumstances, such as when the thickness or level of uniformity of the seed layer changes, when the target plating thickness or profile changes, or when the plating rate changes.
In view of the foregoing, a system for electrochemically processing a microelectronic workpiece that can be used to readily identify electrical parameters that cause a multiple electrode array to achieve a high level of uniformity for a wide range of electrochemical processing variables (e.g., seed layer thicknesses, seed layer types, electroplating materials, etc.) would have significant utility.
A facility for automatically selecting and refining electrical parameters for processing a microelectronic workpiece (“the optimizer”) is disclosed. In some embodiments, the optimizer adjusts the anode currents for a multiple anode electroplating chamber, such as the Semitool CFD-2 chamber, in order to achieve a specified thickness profile (i. e., flat, convex, concave, etc.). The optimizer adjusts anode currents to compensate for changes in the incoming seed layer (feed forward), and to correct for prior wafer non-uniformities (feedback).
The facility typically operates an electroplating chamber containing a principal fluid flow chamber, and a plurality of electrodes disposed in the principal fluid flow chamber. The electroplating chamber typically further contains a workpiece holder positioned to hold at least one surface of the microelectronic workpiece in contact with an electrochemical processing fluid in the principal fluid flow chamber, at least during electrochemical processing of the microelectronic workpiece. One or more electrical contacts are configured to contact the at least one surface of the microelectronic workpiece, and an electrical power supply is connected to the one or more electrical contacts and to the plurality of electrodes. At least two of the plurality of electrodes are independently connected to the electrical power supply to facilitate independent supply of power thereto. The apparatus also includes a control system that is connected to the electrical power supply to control at least one electrical power parameter respectively associated with each of the independently connected electrodes. The control system sets the at least one electrical power parameter for a given one of the independently connected electrodes based on one or more user input parameters and a plurality of predetermined sensitivity values; wherein the sensitivity values correspond to process perturbations resulting from perturbations of the electrical power parameter for the given one of the independently connected electrodes.
For example, although the present invention is described in the context of electrochemical processing of the microelectronic workpiece, the teachings herein can also be extended to other types of microelectronic workpiece processing. In effect, the teachings herein can be extended to other microelectronic workpiece processing systems that have individually controlled processing elements that are responsive to control parameters and that have interdependent effects on a physical characteristic of the microelectronic workpiece that is processed using the elements. Such systems may employ sensitivity tables/matrices as set forth herein and use them in calculations with one or more input parameters sets to arrive at control parameter values that accurately result in the targeted physical characteristic of the microelectronic workpiece.
While the optimizer is shown as receiving inputs and producing outputs at various points in the processing of these values, it will be understood by those in the art that the optimizer may be variously defined to include or exclude aspects of such processing. For example, while
During chamber setup, chamber-to-chamber current adjustments are made that compensate for chamber-to-chamber manufacturing tolerances, setup, power supply, etc. First, a recipe is defined that contains nominal current settings specifically designed to standardize the chamber setup is used. The seed layer of a wafer is measured and then processed using the standard recipe. The outgoing plated wafer is then measured, providing the optimizer with the necessary data to compute chamber specific corrections. The process iterates until the results are within some tolerance. This procedure is then repeated for each plating chamber. A comparison of the final currents between all chambers and the standard recipe currents then yields an offset table for each chamber.
During production runs, the seed layer of the incoming wafer is measured and the optimizer is used to calculate the correction for that seed layer relative to a set of baseline currents. The chamber specific correction is automatically applied to the process. The feedback loop may be omitted in this case if all wafers are not measured after plating. Consequently, when a wafer is being processed, the recipe will be adjusted for the seed layer correction and the chamber specific correction.
The reactor head 30 of the reactor assembly 20 can include a stationary assembly (not shown) and a rotor assembly (not shown). The rotor assembly may be 5 configured to receive and carry an associated microelectronic workpiece 25, position the microelectronic workpiece in a process-side down orientation within reactor container 35, and to rotate or spin the workpiece. The reactor head 30 can also include one or more contacts 85 (shown schematically) that provide electroplating power to the surface of the microelectronic workpiece. In the illustrated embodiment, the contacts 85 are configured lo to contact a seed layer or other conductive material that is to be plated on the plating surface microelectronic workpiece 25. It will be recognized, however, that the contacts 85 can engage either the front side or the backside of the workpiece depending upon the appropriate conductive path between the contacts and the area that is to be plated. Suitable reactor heads 30 with contacts 85 are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,080,291 and U.S. application Ser. Nos. 09/386,803; 09/386,610; 09/386,197; 09/717,927; and 09/823,948, all of which are expressly incorporated herein in their entirety by reference.
The reactor head 30 can be carried by a lift/rotate apparatus that rotates the reactor head 30 from an upwardly-facing orientation in which it can receive the microelectronic workpiece to a downwardly facing orientation in which the plating surface of the microelectronic workpiece can contact the electroplating solution in reactor base 35. The lift/rotate apparatus can bring the workpiece 25 into contact with the electroplating solution either coplanar or at a given angle. A robotic system, which can include an end effector, is typically employed for loading/unloading the microelectronic workpiece 25 on the head 30. It will be recognized that other reactor assembly configurations may be used with the inventive aspects of the disclosed reactor chamber, the foregoing being merely illustrative.
The reactor base 35 can include an outer overflow container 37 and an interior processing container 39. A flow of electroplating fluid flows into the processing container 39 through an inlet 42 (arrow I). The electroplating fluid flows through the 30 interior of the processing container 39 and overflows a weir 44 at the top of processing container 39 (arrow F). The fluid overflowing the weir 44 then passes through an overflow container 37 and exits the reactor 20 through an outlet 46 (arrow O). The fluid exiting the outlet 46 may be directed to a recirculation system, chemical replenishment system, disposal system, etc.
The reactor 30 also includes an electrode in the processing container 39 to contact the electrochemical processing fluid (e.g., the electroplating fluid) as it flows through the reactor 30. In the embodiment of
When the reactor 20 electroplates at least one surface of microelectronic workpiece 25, the plating surface of the workpiece 25 functions as a cathode in the electrochemical reaction and the electrode array 56 functions as an anode. To this end, the plating surface of workpiece 25 is connected to a negative potential terminal of a power supply 60 through contacts 85 and the individual electrodes 58 of the electrode array 56 are connected to positive potential terminals of the supply 60. In the illustrated embodiment, each of the individual electrodes 58 is connected to a discrete terminal of the supply 60 so that the supply 60 may individually set and/or alter one or more electrical parameters, such as the current flow, associated with each of the individual electrodes 58. As such, each of the individual electrodes 58 of
The electrode array 56 and the power supply 60 facilitate localized control of the electrical parameters used to electrochemically process the microelectronic workpiece 25. This localized control of the electrical parameters can be used to enhance the uniformity of the electrochemical processing across the surface of the microelectronic workpiece when compared to a single electrode system. Unfortunately, determining the electrical parameters for each of the electrodes 58 in the array 56 to achieve the desired process uniformity can be difficult. The optimizer, however, simplifies and substantially automates the determination of the electrical parameters associated with each of the individually controllable electrodes. In particular, the optimizer determines a plurality of sensitivity values, either experimentally or through numerical simulation, and subsequently uses the sensitivity values to adjust the electrical parameters associated with each of the individually controllable electrodes. The sensitivity values may be placed in a table or may be in the form of a Jacobian matrix. This table/matrix holds information corresponding to process parameter changes (i.e., thickness of the electroplated film) at various points on the workpiece 25 due to electrical parameter perturbations (i.e., electrical current changes) to each of the individually controllable electrodes. This table/matrix is derived from data from a baseline workpiece plus data from separate runs with a perturbation of a controllable electrical parameter to each of the individually controllable electrode.
The optimizer typically executes in a control system 65 that is connected to the power supply 60 in order to supply current values for a plating cycle. The control system 65 can take a variety of forms, including general- or special-purpose computer systems, either integrated into the manufacturing tool containing the reaction chamber or separate from the manufacturing tool. The control system may be communicatively connected to the power supply 60, or may output current values that are in turn manually inputted to the power supply. Where the control system is connected to the power supply by a network, other computer systems and similar devices may intervene between the control system and the power supply. In many embodiments, the control system contains such components as one or more processors, a primary memory for storing programs and data, a persistent memory for persistently storing programs and data, input/output devices, and a computer-readable medium drive, such as a CD-ROM drive or a DVD drive.
Once the values for the sensitivity table/matrix have been determined, the values may be stored in and used by control system 65 to control one or more of the electrical parameters that power supply 60 uses in connection with each of the individually controllable electrodes 58.
In the process of
After the test run is complete, the physical characteristics (i.e., thickness of the electroplated film) of the test workpiece are measured, as at step 72, and compared against a second set of input parameters at step 74. In the illustrated embodiment of the method, the second set of input parameters corresponds to the target physical characteristics of the microelectronic workpiece that are to be ultimately achieved by the process (i.e., the thickness of the electroplated film). Notably, the target physical characteristics can either be uniform over the surface of the microelectronic workpiece 25 or vary over the surface. For example, in the illustrated embodiment, the thickness of an electroplated film on the surface of the microelectronic workpiece 25 can be used as the target physical characteristic, and the user may expressly specify the target thicknesses at various radial distances from the center of the workpiece, a grid relative to the workpiece, or other reference systems relative to fiducials on the workpiece.
The first and second set of input parameters are used at step 74 to generate a set of process error values. To ensure the integrity of the data obtained during the test run, the process error values may be checked at step 76 to make sure that the values fall within a predetermined range, tolerance, etc. If the process error values do not pass this test, a further test run on a further test workpiece may be executed using a different predetermined electrical parameter set, as at step 78, and the method begins again. If the process error values satisfy the test at step 76, the control system 65 derives a new electrical parameter set based on calculations including the set of process error values and the values of the sensitivity table/matrix, as at step 80. Once the new electrical parameter set is derived, the control system 65 directs power supply 60 to use the derived electrical parameters in processing the next microelectronic workpiece, as at step 82. Then, in step 404, the optimizer measures physical characteristics of the test workpiece in a manner similar to step 72. In step 406, the optimizer compares the characteristics measured in step 404 with a set of target characteristics to generate a set of process error values. The set of target characteristics may be the same set of target characteristics as used in step 74, or may be a different set of target characteristics. In step 408, if the error values 25 generated in step 406 are within a predetermined range, then the optimizer continues in step 410, else the facility continues in 80. In step 80, the optimizer derives a new electrical parameter set. In step 410, the optimizer uses the newest electrical parameter derived in step 80 in processing subsequent microelectronic workpieces.
With reference again to
The optimizer can further be understood with reference to a specific embodiment in which the electrochemical process is electroplating, the thickness of the electroplated film is the target physical parameter, and the current provided to each of the individually controlled electrodes 58 is the electrical parameter that is to be controlled to achieve the target film thickness. In accordance with this specific embodiment, a Jacobian sensitivity matrix is first derived from experimental or numerically simulated data.
In order to predict change in the thickness as a function of a change in current, a Jacobian sensitivity matrix is generated numerically using a computational model of the plating chamber. The modeled data includes a baseline film thickness profile and as many perturbation curves as anodes, where each perturbation curve involves adding roughly 0.05 amps to one specific anode. The Jacobian is a matrix of partial derivatives, representing the change in thickness in microns over the change in current in amp minutes. Specifically, the Jacobian is an m×n matrix where m, the number of rows, is equal to the number of data points in the modeled data and n, the number of columns, is equal to the number of anodes on the reactor. Typically, the value of m is relatively large (>100) due to the computational mesh chosen for the model of the chamber. The components of the matrix are calculated by taking the quotient of the difference in thickness due to the perturbed anode and the current change in amp-minutes, which is the product of the current change in amps and the run time in minutes.
For simplicity, the number of rows is reduced to the number of radial test points within a standard contour map (4 for 200 mm and 6 for 300 mm) plus one, where the extra point is added to better the 3 sigma uniformity for all the points (i.e., to better the diameter scan). A trial and error method is used for the precise location of this point, which is defined to be between the two outermost radial points in the standard map.
A specific map may be designed for the metrology station, which will measure the appropriate points on the wafer corresponding with the radial positions necessary for the optimizer operation.
The data for the Jacobian parameters shown in
t represents thickness [microns];
AM represents current [amp-minutes];
ε represents perturbation [amp-minutes];
i is an integer corresponding to a radial position on the workpiece;
j is an integer representing a particular anode;
m is an integer corresponding to the total number of radial positions on the workpiece; and
n is an integer representing the total number of individually-controllable anodes.
The Jacobian sensitivity matrix, set forth below as Equation (A5), is an index of the Jacobian values computed using Equations (A1)–(A4). The Jacobian matrix may be generated either using a simulation of the operation of the deposition chamber based upon a numerical model of the deposition chamber, or using experimental data derived from the plating of one or more test wafers. Construction of such a numerical model, as well as its use to simulate operation of the modeled deposition chamber, is discussed in detail in G. Ritter, P. McHugh, G. Wilson and T. Ritzdorf, “Two- and three-dimensional numerical modeling of copper electroplating for advanced ULSI metallization,” Solid State Electronics, volume 44, issue 5, pp. 797–807 (May 2000), available from http://www.elsevier.nl/gej-ng/10/30/25/29/28/27/article.pdf, also available from htttp://journals.ohiolink.edu/pdflinks/01040215463800982.pdf.
The values in the Jacobian matrix are also presented as highlighted data points in the graph of
Table 1 below sets forth exemplary data corresponding to a test run in which a 200 mm wafer is plated with copper in a multiple anode system using a nominally 2000 Å thick initial copper seed-layer. Identical currents of 1.12 Amps (for 3 minutes) were provided to all four anodes A1–A4. The resulting thickness at five radial locations was then measured and is recorded in the second column of Table 1. The 3 sigma uniformity of the wafer is 9.4% using a 49 point contour map. Target thickness were then provided and are set forth in column 3 of Table 1. In this example, because a flat coating is desired, the target thickness is the same at each radial position. The thickness errors (processed errors) between the plated film and the target thickness were then calculated and are provided in the last column of Table 1. These calculated thickness errors are used by the optimizer as a source of feedback control.
DATA FROM WAFER PLATED WITH 1.12 AMPS TO
The Jacobian sensitivity matrix may then be used along with the thickness error values to provide a revised set of anode current values that should yield better film uniformity. The equations summarizing this approach are set forth below:
ΔAM=J −1 Δt
(for a square system in which the number of measured radial positions corresponds to the number of individually controlled anodes in the system); and
ΔAM=(J T J)−1 J T Δt
(for a non-square system in which the number of measured radial positions is different than the number of individually controlled anodes in the system).
Table 2 shows the foregoing equations as applied to the given data set and the corresponding current changes that have been derived from the equations to meet the target thickness at each radial location (best least square fit). Such application of the equations, and construction of the Jacobian matrix is in some embodiments performed using a spreadsheet application program, such as Microsoft Excel®, in connection with specialized macro programs. In other embodiments, different approaches are used in constructing the Jacobian matrix and applying the above equations.
The wafer uniformity obtained with the currents in the last column of Table 2was 1.7% (compared to 9.4% for the test run wafer). This procedure can be repeated again to try to further improve the uniformity. In this example, the differences between the seed layers were ignored.
Run #1 (Amps)
Run #2 (Amps)
Once the corrected values for the anode currents have been calculated, control system 65 of
In some instances, it may be desirable to iteratively apply the foregoing equations to arrive at a set of current change values (the values shown in column 3 of Table 2)that add up to zero. For example, doing so enables the total plating charge—and therefore the total mass of plated material—to be held constant without having to vary the recipe time.
The Jacobian sensitivity matrix in the foregoing example quantifies the system respond to anode current changes about a baseline condition. Ideally, a different matrix may be employed if the processing conditions vary significantly from the baseline. The system parameters that may influence the sensitivity values of the sensitivity matrix is quite large. Such system parameters include the seed layer thickness, the electrolyte conductivity, the metal being plated, the film thickness, the plating rate, the contact ring geometry, the wafer position relative to the chamber, and the anode shape/current distribution. Anode shape/current distribution is included to accommodate chamber designs where changes in the shape of consumable anodes over time affect plating characteristics of the chamber. Changes to all of these items can change the current density across the wafer for a given set of anode currents and, as a result, can change the response of the system to changes in the anode currents. It is expected, however, that small changes to many of these parameters will not require the calculation of a new sensitivity matrix. Nevertheless, a plurality of sensitivity tables/matrices may be derived for different processing conditions and stored in control system 65. Which of the sensitivity tables/matrices is to be used by the control system 65 can be entered manually by a user, or can be set automatically depending on measurements taken by certain sensors or the like (i.e., temperature sensors, chemical analysis units, etc.) that indicate the existence of one or more particular processing conditions.
The optimizer may also be used to compensate for differences and non-uniformities of the initial seed layer of the microelectronic workpiece. Generally stated, a blanket seed layer can affect the uniformity of a plated film in two ways:
1. If the seed layer non-uniformity changes, this non-uniformity is added to the final film. For example, if the seed layer is 100 Å thinner at the outer edge than expected, the final film thickness may also be 100 Å thinner at the outer edge.
2. If the average seed-layer thickness changes significantly, the resistance of the seed-layer will change resulting in a modified current density distribution across the wafer and altered film uniformity. For example, if the seed layer decreases from 2000Å to 1000Å, the final film will not only be thinner (because the initial film is thinner) but it will also be relatively thicker at the outer edge due to the higher resistivity of the 1000Å seed-layer compared to the 2000 Å seed-layer (assuming an edge contact).
The optimizer can be used to compensate for such seed-layer deviations, thereby utilizing seed-layer thicknesses as a source of feed-forward control. In the first case above, the changes in seed-layer uniformity may be handled in the same manner that errors between target thickness and measured thickness are handled. A pre-measurement of the wafer quantifies changes in the seed-layer thickness at the various radial measurement locations and these changes (errors) are figured into the current adjustment calculations. Using this approach, excellent uniformity results can be obtained on the new seed layer, even on the first attempt at electroplating.
In the second case noted above, an update of or selection of another stored sensitivity/Jacobian matrix can be used to account for a significantly different resistance of the seed-layer. A simple method to adjust for the new seed layer thickness is to plate a film onto the new seed layer using the same currents used in plating a film on the previous seed layer. The thickness errors measured from this wafer can be used with a sensitivity matrix appropriate for the new seed-layer to adjust the currents.
The optimizer may also be used to compensate for reactor-to-reactor variations in a multiple reactor system, such as the LT-210C™ available from Semitool, Inc., of Kalispell, Mont. In such a system, there is a possibility that the anode currents required to plate a specified film might be different on one reactor when compared to another. Some possible sources for such differences include variations in the wafer position due to tolerances in the lift-rotate mechanism, variations in the current provided to each anode due to power supply manufacturing tolerances, variations in the chamber geometry due to manufacturing tolerances, variations in the plating solution, etc.
In a single anode system, the reactor-to-reactor variation is typically reduced either by reducing hardware manufacturing tolerances or by making slight hardware modifications to each reactor to compensate for reactor variations. In a multiple anode reactor constructed in accordance with the teachings of the present invention, reactor-to-reactor variations can be reduced/eliminated by running slightly different current sets in each reactor. As long as the reactor variations do not fundamentally change the system response (i.e., the sensitivity matrix), the self-tuning scheme disclosed herein is expected to find anode currents that meet film thickness targets. Reactor-to-reactor variations can be quantified by comparing differences in the final anode currents for each chamber. These differences can be saved in one or more offset tables in the control system 65 so that the same recipe may be utilized in each reactor. In addition, these offset tables may be used to increase the efficiency of entering 30 new processing recipes into the control system 65. Furthermore, these findings can be used to trouble-shoot reactor set up. For example, if the values in the offset table are over a particular threshold, the deviation may indicate a hardware deficiency that needs to be corrected.
To further illuminate the operation of the optimizer, a second test run is described.
The optimization process begins with a baseline current set or standard recipe currents. A wafer must be pre-read for seed layer thickness data, and then plated using the indicated currents. After plating, the wafer is re-measured for the final thickness values. The following wafer must also be pre-read for seed layer thickness data. Various points at the standard five radial positions (0 mm, 31.83 mm, 63.67 mm, 80 mm, 95.5 mm) are typically measured and averaged for each wafer reading.
The thickness data from the previous wafer, and the new wafer seed layer, in addition to the anode currents, are entered into the input page of the optimizer. The user may also elect to input a thickness specification, or chose to modify the plating thickness by adjusting the total current in amp-minutes. After all the data is correctly inputted, the user activates the optimizer. In response, the optimizer predicts thickness changes and calculates new currents.
The new wafer is then plated with the adjusted anode currents and then measured. A second modification may be required if the thickness profile is not satisfactory.
Using a single iteration, the optimizer can predict the currents for the computational model to produce a uniform wafer, whereas two or three iterations are necessary for the lab to achieve an acceptable profile. Good symmetry is one factor for the optimization procedure because the optimizer is assuming the wafer has a constant thickness at a given radial position. Usually, the more symmetric the previous wafer is, the fewer number of iterations are necessary to accomplish the acceptable uniformity. Ensuring good contact on the wafer during plating improves the possibility of achieving adequate symmetry.
When a further iteration is required, the optimization is continued. As before, the post- plated wafer is measured for thickness values, and another wafer is pre-read for a new seed set of seed layer thickness values. Then, the following quantities are entered on the input page:
1. plated wafer thickness,
2. anode currents,
3. plated wafer seed layer thickness, and
The recipe time and thickness profile specification should be consistent with the previous iteration. The program is now ready to be run again to provide a new set of anode currents for the next plating attempt.
After plating with the new currents, the processed wafer is measured and if the uniformity is still not acceptable, the procedure may be continued with another iteration. The standard value determining the uniformity of a wafer is the 3-σ, which is the standard deviation of the measured points relative to the mean and multiplied by three. Usually a forty-nine point map is used with measurements at the radial positions of approximately 0 mm, 32 mm, 64 mm, and 95 mm to test for uniformity.
The above procedure will be demonstrated using a multi-iteration example. Wafer #3934 is the first plated wafer using a set of standard anode currents: 0.557/0.818/1.039/0.786 (anode1/ anode2/ anode3/ anode4 in amps) with a recipe time of 2.33 minutes (140 seconds). Before plating, the wafer is pre-read for seed layer data. These thickness values, in microns, from the center to the outer edge, are shown in Table 3:
SEED LAYER THICKNESS VALUES FOR WAFER #3934
The wafer is then sent to the plating chamber, and then re-measured after being processed. The resulting thickness values (in microns) for the post-plated wafer #3934 are shown in Table 4:
THICKNESS VALUES FOR POST-PLATED WAFER #3934
The 3-σ for the plated wafer is calculated to be 2.67% over a range of 230.4 Angstroms. Since the currents are already producing a wafer below 3%, any adjustments are going to be minor. The subsequent wafer has to be pre-read for seed layer values in order to compensate for any seed layer differences. Wafer #4004 is measured and the thickness values in microns are shown in Table 5:
SEED LAYER THICKNESS VALUES FOR WAFER #4004
For this optimization run, there is no thickness profile specification, or overall thickness adjustment. All of the preceding data is inputted into the optimizer, and the optimizer is activated to generate a new set of currents. These currents will be used to plate the next wafer.
The new anode currents are sent to the process recipe and run in the plating chamber. The run time and total currents (amp-minutes) remain constant, and the current density on the wafer is unchanged. The new seed layer data from this run for wafer #4004 will become the old seed layer data for the next iteration.
The thickness (microns) resulting from the adjusted currents plated on wafer #4004 are shown in Table 6:
THICKNESS VALUES FOR POST-PLATED WAFER #4004
The post-plated wafer has a 3-σ of 2.117% over a range of 248.6 Angstroms. To do another iteration, a new seed layer measurement is required, unless notified that the batch of wafers has equivalent seed layers. Wafer # 4220 is pre-measured and the thickness values in microns are shown in Table 7:
SEED LAYER THICKNESS VALUES FOR WAFER #4220
Again, all of the new data is inputted into the optimizer, along with the currents used to plate the new wafer and the thickness of the plated wafer's seed. The optimizer automatically transfers the new currents into the old currents among the inputs. The optimizer is then activated to generate a new set of currents.
The corrected anode currents are again sent to the recipe and applied to the plating process. The 2nd adjustments on the anode currents produce the thickness values in microns shown in Table 8:
THICKNESS VALUES FOR POST-PLATED WAFER #4220
The 3-σ for wafer #4220 is 1.97% over a range of 213.6 Angstroms. The procedure may continue to better the uniformity, but the for the purpose of this explanation, a 3-σ below 2% is acceptable.
Numerous modifications may be made to the described optimizer without departing from the basic teachings thereof. For example, although the present invention is described in the context of electrochemical processing of the microelectronic workpiece, the teachings herein can also be extended to other types of microelectronic workpiece processing, including various kinds of material deposition processes. For example, the optimizer may be used to control electrophoretic deposition of material, chemical or physical vapor deposition, etc. In effect, the teachings herein can be extended to other microelectronic workpiece processing systems that have individually controlled processing elements that are responsive to control parameters and that have interdependent effects on a physical characteristic of the microelectronic workpiece that is processed using the elements. Such systems may employ sensitivity tables/matrices as set forth herein and use them in calculations with one or more input parameters sets to arrive at control parameter values that accurately result in the targeted physical characteristic of the microelectronic workpiece. Although the present invention has been described in substantial detail with reference to one or more specific embodiments, those of skill in the art will recognize that changes may be made thereto without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention as set forth herein.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US1526644||Oct 25, 1922||Feb 17, 1925||Williams Brothers Mfg Company||Process of electroplating and apparatus therefor|
|US1881713||Dec 3, 1928||Oct 11, 1932||Arthur K Laukel||Flexible and adjustable anode|
|US2256274||Jun 19, 1939||Sep 16, 1941||Firm J D Riedel E De Haen A G||Salicylic acid sulphonyl sulphanilamides|
|US3309263||Dec 3, 1964||Mar 14, 1967||Kimberly Clark Co||Web pickup and transfer for a papermaking machine|
|US3616284||Aug 21, 1968||Oct 26, 1971||Bell Telephone Labor Inc||Processing arrays of junction devices|
|US3664933||May 19, 1969||May 23, 1972||Udylite Corp||Process for acid copper plating of zinc|
|US3706635||Nov 15, 1971||Dec 19, 1972||Monsanto Co||Electrochemical compositions and processes|
|US3706651||Dec 30, 1970||Dec 19, 1972||Us Navy||Apparatus for electroplating a curved surface|
|US3716462||Oct 5, 1970||Feb 13, 1973||Jensen D||Copper plating on zinc and its alloys|
|US3798003||Feb 14, 1972||Mar 19, 1974||Ensley E||Differential microcalorimeter|
|US3878066||Aug 29, 1973||Apr 15, 1975||Dettke Manfred||Bath for galvanic deposition of gold and gold alloys|
|US3930963||Feb 11, 1972||Jan 6, 1976||Photocircuits Division Of Kollmorgen Corporation||Method for the production of radiant energy imaged printed circuit boards|
|US3968885||Aug 27, 1974||Jul 13, 1976||International Business Machines Corporation||Method and apparatus for handling workpieces|
|US4000046||Dec 23, 1974||Dec 28, 1976||P. R. Mallory & Co., Inc.||Method of electroplating a conductive layer over an electrolytic capacitor|
|US4022679||Dec 19, 1975||May 10, 1977||C. Conradty||Coated titanium anode for amalgam heavy duty cells|
|US4030015||Oct 20, 1975||Jun 14, 1977||International Business Machines Corporation||Pulse width modulated voltage regulator-converter/power converter having push-push regulator-converter means|
|US4046105||Jun 16, 1975||Sep 6, 1977||Xerox Corporation||Laminar deep wave generator|
|US4072557||Feb 28, 1977||Feb 7, 1978||J. M. Voith Gmbh||Method and apparatus for shrinking a travelling web of fibrous material|
|US4082638||Dec 21, 1976||Apr 4, 1978||Jumer John F||Apparatus for incremental electro-processing of large areas|
|US4113577||Mar 10, 1977||Sep 12, 1978||National Semiconductor Corporation||Method for plating semiconductor chip headers|
|US4134802||Oct 3, 1977||Jan 16, 1979||Oxy Metal Industries Corporation||Electrolyte and method for electrodepositing bright metal deposits|
|US4137867||Sep 12, 1977||Feb 6, 1979||Seiichiro Aigo||Apparatus for bump-plating semiconductor wafers|
|US4165252||Mar 6, 1978||Aug 21, 1979||Burroughs Corporation||Method for chemically treating a single side of a workpiece|
|US4170959||Apr 4, 1978||Oct 16, 1979||Seiichiro Aigo||Apparatus for bump-plating semiconductor wafers|
|US4222834||Jun 6, 1979||Sep 16, 1980||Western Electric Company, Inc.||Selectively treating an article|
|US4238310||Oct 3, 1979||Dec 9, 1980||United Technologies Corporation||Apparatus for electrolytic etching|
|US4246088||Jan 24, 1979||Jan 20, 1981||Metal Box Limited||Method and apparatus for electrolytic treatment of containers|
|US4259166||Mar 31, 1980||Mar 31, 1981||Rca Corporation||Shield for plating substrate|
|US4287029||Mar 24, 1980||Sep 1, 1981||Sonix Limited||Plating process|
|US4304641||Nov 24, 1980||Dec 8, 1981||International Business Machines Corporation||Rotary electroplating cell with controlled current distribution|
|US4323433||Sep 22, 1980||Apr 6, 1982||The Boeing Company||Anodizing process employing adjustable shield for suspended cathode|
|US4341629||Aug 28, 1978||Jul 27, 1982||Sand And Sea Industries, Inc.||Means for desalination of water through reverse osmosis|
|US4360410||Mar 6, 1981||Nov 23, 1982||Western Electric Company, Inc.||Electroplating processes and equipment utilizing a foam electrolyte|
|US4378283||Jul 30, 1981||Mar 29, 1983||National Semiconductor Corporation||Consumable-anode selective plating apparatus|
|US4384930||Aug 21, 1981||May 24, 1983||Mcgean-Rohco, Inc.||Electroplating baths, additives therefor and methods for the electrodeposition of metals|
|US4391694||Feb 11, 1982||Jul 5, 1983||Ab Europa Film||Apparatus in electro deposition plants, particularly for use in making master phonograph records|
|US4422915||Sep 4, 1979||Dec 27, 1983||Battelle Memorial Institute||Preparation of colored polymeric film-like coating|
|US4431361||Aug 31, 1981||Feb 14, 1984||Heraeus Quarzschmelze Gmbh||Methods of and apparatus for transferring articles between carrier members|
|US4437943||Jul 9, 1980||Mar 20, 1984||Olin Corporation||Method and apparatus for bonding metal wire to a base metal substrate|
|US4440597||Mar 15, 1982||Apr 3, 1984||The Procter & Gamble Company||Wet-microcontracted paper and concomitant process|
|US4443117||Jun 16, 1981||Apr 17, 1984||Terumo Corporation||Measuring apparatus, method of manufacture thereof, and method of writing data into same|
|US4449885||May 24, 1982||May 22, 1984||Varian Associates, Inc.||Wafer transfer system|
|US4451197||Jul 26, 1982||May 29, 1984||Advanced Semiconductor Materials Die Bonding, Inc.||Object detection apparatus and method|
|US4463503||Jun 29, 1983||Aug 7, 1984||Driall, Inc.||Grain drier and method of drying grain|
|US4466864||Dec 16, 1983||Aug 21, 1984||At&T Technologies, Inc.||Methods of and apparatus for electroplating preselected surface regions of electrical articles|
|US4469566||Aug 29, 1983||Sep 4, 1984||Dynamic Disk, Inc.||Method and apparatus for producing electroplated magnetic memory disk, and the like|
|US4475823||Apr 9, 1982||Oct 9, 1984||Piezo Electric Products, Inc.||Self-calibrating thermometer|
|US4480028||Jan 28, 1983||Oct 30, 1984||Konishiroku Photo Industry Co., Ltd.||Silver halide color photographic light-sensitive material|
|US4495153||May 3, 1982||Jan 22, 1985||Nissan Motor Company, Limited||Catalytic converter for treating engine exhaust gases|
|US4495453||Jun 23, 1982||Jan 22, 1985||Fujitsu Fanuc Limited||System for controlling an industrial robot|
|US4500394||May 16, 1984||Feb 19, 1985||At&T Technologies, Inc.||Contacting a surface for plating thereon|
|US4529480||Aug 23, 1983||Jul 16, 1985||The Procter & Gamble Company||Tissue paper|
|US4541895||Oct 29, 1982||Sep 17, 1985||Scapa Inc.||Papermakers fabric of nonwoven layers in a laminated construction|
|US4566847||Feb 28, 1983||Jan 28, 1986||Kabushiki Kaisha Daini Seikosha||Industrial robot|
|US4576685||Apr 23, 1985||Mar 18, 1986||Schering Ag||Process and apparatus for plating onto articles|
|US4576689||Apr 25, 1980||Mar 18, 1986||Makkaev Almaxud M||Process for electrochemical metallization of dielectrics|
|US4585539||Oct 12, 1983||Apr 29, 1986||Technic, Inc.||Electrolytic reactor|
|US4604177||Feb 11, 1985||Aug 5, 1986||Alcan International Limited||Electrolysis cell for a molten electrolyte|
|US4604178||Mar 1, 1985||Aug 5, 1986||The Dow Chemical Company||Anode|
|US4634503||Jun 27, 1984||Jan 6, 1987||Daniel Nogavich||Immersion electroplating system|
|US4639028||Nov 13, 1984||Jan 27, 1987||Economic Development Corporation||High temperature and acid resistant wafer pick up device|
|US4648944||Jul 18, 1985||Mar 10, 1987||Martin Marietta Corporation||Apparatus and method for controlling plating induced stress in electroforming and electroplating processes|
|US4670126||Apr 28, 1986||Jun 2, 1987||Varian Associates, Inc.||Sputter module for modular wafer processing system|
|US4685414||Apr 3, 1985||Aug 11, 1987||Dirico Mark A||Coating printed sheets|
|US4687552||Dec 2, 1985||Aug 18, 1987||Tektronix, Inc.||Rhodium capped gold IC metallization|
|US4693017||Oct 16, 1985||Sep 15, 1987||Gebr. Steimel||Centrifuging installation|
|US4696729||Feb 28, 1986||Sep 29, 1987||International Business Machines||Electroplating cell|
|US4715934||Nov 18, 1985||Dec 29, 1987||Lth Associates||Process and apparatus for separating metals from solutions|
|US4741624||Sep 25, 1986||May 3, 1988||Omya, S. A.||Device for putting in contact fluids appearing in the form of different phases|
|US4760671||Aug 19, 1985||Aug 2, 1988||Owens-Illinois Television Products Inc.||Method of and apparatus for automatically grinding cathode ray tube faceplates|
|US4761214||Mar 23, 1987||Aug 2, 1988||Airfoil Textron Inc.||ECM machine with mechanisms for venting and clamping a workpart shroud|
|US4770590||May 16, 1986||Sep 13, 1988||Silicon Valley Group, Inc.||Method and apparatus for transferring wafers between cassettes and a boat|
|US4781800||Sep 29, 1987||Nov 1, 1988||President And Fellows Of Harvard College||Deposition of metal or alloy film|
|US4800818||Nov 3, 1986||Jan 31, 1989||Hitachi Kiden Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha||Linear motor-driven conveyor means|
|US4828654||Mar 23, 1988||May 9, 1989||Protocad, Inc.||Variable size segmented anode array for electroplating|
|US4849054||Jan 14, 1988||Jul 18, 1989||James River-Norwalk, Inc.||High bulk, embossed fiber sheet material and apparatus and method of manufacturing the same|
|US4858539||Mar 1, 1988||Aug 22, 1989||Veb Kombinat Polygraph "Werner Lamberz" Leipzig||Rotational switching apparatus with separately driven stitching head|
|US4864239||Dec 5, 1983||Sep 5, 1989||General Electric Company||Cylindrical bearing inspection|
|US4868992||Apr 22, 1988||Sep 26, 1989||Intel Corporation||Anode cathode parallelism gap gauge|
|US4898647||Dec 22, 1988||Feb 6, 1990||Gould, Inc.||Process and apparatus for electroplating copper foil|
|US4902398||Apr 27, 1988||Feb 20, 1990||American Thim Film Laboratories, Inc.||Computer program for vacuum coating systems|
|US4906341||Sep 22, 1988||Mar 6, 1990||Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba||Method of manufacturing semiconductor device and apparatus therefor|
|US4913085||Aug 2, 1988||Apr 3, 1990||Esb Elektorstatische Spruh-Und Beschichtungsanlagen G.F. Vohringer Gmbh||Coating booth for applying a coating powder to the surface of workpieces|
|US4924890||May 16, 1986||May 15, 1990||Eastman Kodak Company||Method and apparatus for cleaning semiconductor wafers|
|US4944650||Oct 28, 1988||Jul 31, 1990||Mitsubishi Kinzoku Kabushiki Kaisha||Apparatus for detecting and centering wafer|
|US4949671||Dec 21, 1988||Aug 21, 1990||Texas Instruments Incorporated||Processing apparatus and method|
|US4951601||Jun 23, 1989||Aug 28, 1990||Applied Materials, Inc.||Multi-chamber integrated process system|
|US4959278||Jun 8, 1989||Sep 25, 1990||Nippon Mining Co., Ltd.||Tin whisker-free tin or tin alloy plated article and coating technique thereof|
|US4962726||Nov 9, 1988||Oct 16, 1990||Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.||Chemical vapor deposition reaction apparatus having isolated reaction and buffer chambers|
|US4979464||Jun 13, 1988||Dec 25, 1990||Convac Gmbh||Apparatus for treating wafers in the manufacture of semiconductor elements|
|US4988533||May 27, 1988||Jan 29, 1991||Texas Instruments Incorporated||Method for deposition of silicon oxide on a wafer|
|US5000827||Jan 2, 1990||Mar 19, 1991||Motorola, Inc.||Method and apparatus for adjusting plating solution flow characteristics at substrate cathode periphery to minimize edge effect|
|US5024746||May 14, 1990||Jun 18, 1991||Texas Instruments Incorporated||Fixture and a method for plating contact bumps for integrated circuits|
|US5026239||Sep 5, 1989||Jun 25, 1991||Canon Kabushiki Kaisha||Mask cassette and mask cassette loading device|
|US5048589||Dec 18, 1989||Sep 17, 1991||Kimberly-Clark Corporation||Non-creped hand or wiper towel|
|US5054988||Jul 11, 1989||Oct 8, 1991||Tel Sagami Limited||Apparatus for transferring semiconductor wafers|
|US5055036||Feb 26, 1991||Oct 8, 1991||Tokyo Electron Sagami Limited||Method of loading and unloading wafer boat|
|US5061144||Nov 28, 1989||Oct 29, 1991||Tokyo Electron Limited||Resist process apparatus|
|US5069548||Aug 8, 1990||Dec 3, 1991||Industrial Technology Institute||Field shift moire system|
|US5871805 *||Apr 8, 1996||Feb 16, 1999||Lemelson; Jerome||Computer controlled vapor deposition processes|
|US6051284 *||May 8, 1996||Apr 18, 2000||Applied Materials, Inc.||Chamber monitoring and adjustment by plasma RF metrology|
|US6678055 *||Nov 26, 2001||Jan 13, 2004||Tevet Process Control Technologies Ltd.||Method and apparatus for measuring stress in semiconductor wafers|
|US6709562 *||Jul 6, 1999||Mar 23, 2004||International Business Machines Corporation||Method of making electroplated interconnection structures on integrated circuit chips|
|US20020139678 *||May 24, 2001||Oct 3, 2002||Wilson Gregory J.||Tuning electrodes used in a reactor for electrochemically processing a microelectronic workpiece|
|1||Contolini et al., "Copper Electroplating Process for Sub-Half-Micron ULSI Structures," VMIC Conference 1995 ISMIC-04/95/0322, pp. 322-328, Jun. 17-29, 1995.|
|2||Devaraj et al., "Pulsed Electrodeposition of Copper," Plating & Surface Finishing, pp. 72-78, Aug. 1992.|
|3||Dubin, "Copper Plating Techniques for ULSI Metallization," Advanced MicroDevices.|
|4||Dubin, V.M., "Electrochemical Deposition of Copper for On-Chip Interconnects," Advanced MicroDevices.|
|5||Gauvin et al., "The Effect of Chloride Ions on Copper Deposition," J. of Electrochemical Society, vol. 99, pp. 71-75, Feb. 1952.|
|6||International Search Report for PCT/US01/14509, Applicant: Semitool, Inc., Apr. 28, 2005, 6 pages.|
|7||Lee, Tien-Yu Tom, "Application of a CFD Tool in Designing a Fountain Plating Cell for Uniform Bump Plating of Semiconductor Wafers," IEE Transactions on Components, Packaging, and Manufacturing Technology (Feb. 1996), vol. 19, No. 1, IEEE.|
|8||Lowenheim, F.A., "Electroplating," Jan. 1979, 12 pgs, McGraw-Hill Book Company.|
|9||Lowenheim, Frederick A., "Electroplating Electrochemistry Applied to Electroplating," 1978, pp 152-155, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York.|
|10||Ossro, N.M., "An Overview of Pulse Plating," Plating and Surface Finishing, Mar. 1986.|
|11||Passal, F., "Copper Plating During the Last Fifty Years," Plating, pp. 628-638, Jun. 1959.|
|12||Patent Abstract of Japan, "Organic Compound and its Application," Publciation No. 08-003153, Publication Date: Jan. 9, 1996.|
|13||Patent Abstract of Japan, "Partial Plating Device," Publciation No. 01234590, Publication Date: Sep. 19, 1989.|
|14||Patent Abstract of Japan, "Plating Method" Publication No. 57171690, Publication Date: Oct. 22, 1982.|
|15||Patent Abstract of Japan, English Abstract Translation-Japanese Utility Model No. 2538705, Publication Date: Aug. 25, 1992.|
|16||Ritter et al., "Two- And Three- Dimensional Numberical Modeling of Copper Electroplating For Advanced ULSI Metallization", E-MRS Conference, Symposium M, Basic Models to Enhance Reliability, Strasbourg (France), 1999.|
|17||Singer, P., "Copper Goes Mainstream: Low k to Follow," Semiconductor International, pp. 67-70, Nov. 1997.|
|18||U.S. Appl. No. 09/679,928, Woodruff et al.|
|19||U.S. Appl. No. 10/729,349, Klocke.|
|20||U.S. Appl. No. 10/729,357, Klocke.|
|21||U.S. Appl. No. 10/817,659, Wilson et al.|
|22||U.S. Appl. No. 60/129,055, McHugh.|
|23||U.S. Appl. No. 60/143,769, McHugh.|
|24||U.S. Appl. No. 60/182,160, McHugh et al.|
|25||U.S. Appl. No. 60/206,663, Wilson et al.|
|26||U.S. Appl. No. 60/294,690, Gibbons et al.|
|27||U.S. Appl. No. 60/316,597, Hanson.|
|28||U.S. Appl. No. 60/607,046, Klocke.|
|29||U.S. Appl. No. 60/607,460, Klocke.|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US7842173||Jan 29, 2007||Nov 30, 2010||Semitool, Inc.||Apparatus and methods for electrochemical processing of microfeature wafers|
|US8313631||Nov 2, 2010||Nov 20, 2012||Applied Materials Inc.||Apparatus and methods for electrochemical processing of microfeature wafers|
|US8585875 *||Sep 23, 2011||Nov 19, 2013||Applied Materials, Inc.||Substrate plating apparatus with multi-channel field programmable gate array|
|US9222195||Sep 5, 2012||Dec 29, 2015||Applied Materials, Inc.||Electroplating systems and methods for high sheet resistance substrates|
|US20020084183 *||Jan 29, 2002||Jul 4, 2002||Hanson Kyle M.||Apparatus and method for electrochemically processing a microelectronic workpiece|
|US20080179180 *||Jan 29, 2007||Jul 31, 2008||Mchugh Paul R||Apparatus and methods for electrochemical processing of microfeature wafers|
|US20100116671 *||Oct 3, 2006||May 13, 2010||Semitool, Inc.||Apparatus and method for electrochemically depositing metal on a semiconductor workpiece|
|US20110042224 *||Nov 2, 2010||Feb 24, 2011||Semitool, Inc.||Apparatus and methods for electrochemical processing of microfeature wafers|
|US20110259752 *||Sep 16, 2008||Oct 27, 2011||Acm Research (Shanghai) Inc.||Method for substantially uniform copper deposition onto semiconductor wafer|
|US20130075264 *||Sep 23, 2011||Mar 28, 2013||Applied Materials, Inc.||Substrate plating apparatus with multi-channel field programmable gate array|
|U.S. Classification||700/123, 427/8, 427/9, 205/82, 427/585, 205/83, 700/121, 700/44, 205/84, 700/262, 700/45, 700/263, 700/119, 700/37|
|International Classification||C25D17/00, C25D21/12, C25D5/00, C25D5/02, C25F3/30, C25D7/12, C25F7/00, H01L21/3063, C25C3/16, B23H3/02, G06F19/00, C25B9/00, C25C3/20|
|Cooperative Classification||Y02P90/265, Y02P90/22, C25D21/12, C25D7/123, G05B2219/32182, G05B2219/32216, C25D17/001, G05B2219/45031, G05B19/41875|
|European Classification||C25D21/12, G05B19/418Q, C25D7/12|
|Sep 18, 2001||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: SEMITOOL, INC., MONTANA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:WILSON, GREGORY J.;MCHUGH, PAUL R.;WEAVER, ROBERT A.;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:012174/0266;SIGNING DATES FROM 20010611 TO 20010614
|Jul 11, 2006||CC||Certificate of correction|
|Mar 6, 2007||CC||Certificate of correction|
|Sep 28, 2009||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|Nov 1, 2011||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: APPLIED MATERIALS INC., CALIFORNIA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:SEMITOOL INC;REEL/FRAME:027155/0035
Effective date: 20111021
|Aug 26, 2013||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 8
|Aug 29, 2017||MAFP|
Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 12TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1553)
Year of fee payment: 12