|Publication number||US7029203 B2|
|Application number||US 10/813,810|
|Publication date||Apr 18, 2006|
|Filing date||Mar 30, 2004|
|Priority date||Dec 4, 2000|
|Also published as||US6758634, US7121765, US7172371, US7278800, US20020107428, US20040191002, US20060093437, US20060099036, US20060239778|
|Publication number||10813810, 813810, US 7029203 B2, US 7029203B2, US-B2-7029203, US7029203 B2, US7029203B2|
|Inventors||Reva A. Nickelson, John G. Richardson, Kevin M. Kostelnik, Paul A. Sloan|
|Original Assignee||Battelle Energy Alliance, Llc|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (33), Non-Patent Citations (1), Classifications (19), Legal Events (5)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
This application is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/062,817, filed Feb. 1, 2002, entitled SUBSURFACE MATERIALS MANAGEMENT AND CONTAINMENT SYSTEM, COMPONENTS THEREOF AND METHODS RELATING THERETO now U.S. Pat. No. 6,758,634 which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/267,320, filed Feb. 6, 2001 entitled SUBSURFACE MATERIALS MANAGEMENT AND CONTAINMENT SYSTEM, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. Furthermore, this application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/729,435, filed Mar. 12, 2001, entitled ADVANCED CONTAINMENT SYSTEM, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,575,663 which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
The United States Government has rights in the following invention pursuant to Contract No. DE-AC07-99ID13727 between the U.S. Department of Energy and Bechtel BWXT Idaho, LLC.
The present invention relates generally to methods, components and systems for in situ containment and management of buried waste, contaminated media, and their associated components. Also these methods and devices can be utilized for resource recovery. More particularly, embodiments of the present invention relate to an improved barrier, as well as to its installation and use, for reliably containing and managing leachate, gas phase contaminants, and the like, originating from a zone of interest.
Containment, management, and disposal of various types of waste are long-standing problems. Early waste management and disposal systems were primitive, as there were few or no disposal or environmental regulations in place at the time. In countless instances, the waste was simply buried underground. The volume of waste that has been buried is tremendous. Some experts estimate that landfills in the United States alone hold more than 3 million cubic meters of buried waste. Further, much of the waste that was buried comprises heavy metals such as mercury and cadmium, carcinogenic materials such as trichloroethylene, radioactive materials, and other hazardous substances.
While burial and similar approaches produced an aesthetically pleasing result by removing the waste from sight, it was soon discovered that effluent from the buried waste was working its way through the soil and into the groundwater. This process is commonly known as leaching. Because groundwater is a major source of water for drinking and for agriculture, contamination of the groundwater by leaching is a major concern.
The contamination caused by buried waste is not limited solely to groundwater however. At least some of the contaminated groundwater finds its way into waterways such as streams, rivers, and lakes, thus polluting those waterways and poisoning the plant and animal life. Obviously, polluted waterways pose a threat to humans as well, particularly in the case of waterways and bodies of water used for recreational purposes and/or as a source of drinking water.
Not all of the cases of groundwater pollution arise from the leaching of chemicals from waste sources. In some cases, the waste is buried in the path of the groundwater, and as groundwater flows through the waste, it collects various chemicals and toxins from the waste and deposits those chemicals and toxins in other soils and waterways.
While many of the problems associated with buried waste concern the effect of leachate on groundwater, buried waste also typically emits gas phase contaminants that must likewise be contained and managed. Such gas phase contaminants can also pollute the soil and the groundwater, and may build up to unsafe pressures which could ultimately result in explosion and/or atmospheric venting of the gas.
Clean soil and groundwater are important to human, plant, and animal life as well as to the environment in general. Accordingly, a variety of methods and devices have been devised to attempt to resolve the problems induced by buried waste. These remedies can be broadly grouped into the categories of remediation and containment. Remediation remedies focus on processes designed to change the chemical composition of a contaminated material or contaminant to one more benign, while containment remedies seek to eliminate the pollution problem by removing or isolating the contaminants and contaminated material from the surrounding area.
Remediation approaches such as biological treatments, thermal processes and chemical processes are problematic for a variety of reasons. In particular, many of these remediation techniques are expensive and potentially hazardous. Further, it is difficult to verify the effectiveness of many of the treatments and remediation-type approaches may not be appropriate for all types of contaminated material. Finally, determining the proper remediation technique is, in itself, a complex and time-consuming process, particularly in view of the web of regulations and procedures that govern such treatments.
Containment, barrier, or in situ, approaches are problematic as well. One known containment approach is simply to dig up and remove the contaminated soil for treatment and/or disposal. This approach is expensive and time-consuming and often accomplishes little more than moving the problem to another location. Other containment approaches involve installing vertical and/or horizontal barriers around the buried waste. In theory, this approach is attractive because it does not involve digging up or otherwise disturbing the buried waste.
However, conventional containment or barrier systems suffer from a variety of inadequacies including lack of durability, continuity and integrity. These inadequacies are a function of numerous factors associated with the environment in which the containment or barrier systems are located including, but not limited to: exposure to harsh chemicals such as concentrated saline solutions, and saturated calcite and gypsum solutions; exposure to extreme thermal gradients such as are typically experienced in freeze/thaw zones; and exposure to stresses induced by shifting in the earth.
Hydraulic conductivity, which is the rate at which a fluid or hazardous substance flows through a barrier, is unacceptably high in some barrier systems while other conventional barrier systems are not particularly well-suited to a variety of soil conditions such as hard rock and sand. A further flaw is that many barrier systems do not provide methods for evaluating the integrity of the barrier during and after installation, which is complicated by the fact that many barrier systems also lack provision for long term monitoring of the containment zone and any leachate therefrom. The inability to monitor a barrier system that is isolating hazardous waste is unacceptable because of the potential harm that can be caused to the surrounding environment. The lack of durability, continuity and integrity in known containment systems has a significant detrimental effect on the performance of those systems and the effectiveness of those containment and barrier systems cannot be readily determined or evaluated.
Accordingly, what is needed are improved in situ containment systems and methods for installing these systems. A containment system that is capable of containing, collecting and/or processing effluent which would otherwise escape from a zone of interest, wherein such effluent includes, but is not limited to, leachate, gas phase contaminants, waste, water, and any other material that is desired to be contained, collected, and/or processed would be advantageous.
The present invention includes systems and methods relating to subterranean containment barriers. Tubular casings having male interlock structures and cooperative multiple female interlock recesses are used to create subterranean barriers for containing and treating buried waste and its effluents. The multiple interlocks allow the barriers to be varied in placement around subsurface objects and to form barrier sidewalls. The barrier may be used for treating and monitoring a zone of interest including contaminants.
Casing sections are interlocked to adjacent sections using the male interlocking structures and cooperative female interlock recesses. A sealant is disposed in the recess. Sealants may disposed prior to connecting adjacent casing sections, or after the interlock is formed. Thermoplastic sealants may be used to enable resealing in the event of a breach by reheating to reestablish the seal.
Methods of constructing the barrier include methods for reducing the intrusion of foreign matter into the interlocks during construction by blocking, methods of collecting and containing contaminants using the barrier structures. The components may also be used to treat zones of interest by removing contaminants therefrom, or introducing desired materials thereinto.
The threat to the environment produced by buried waste begins when the contaminants produced by buried waste leach into the groundwater. Once groundwater has been contaminated, the potential harm is great, because groundwater typically makes its way to rivers and lakes, which are frequently sources of drinking water and irrigation water. In this manner, the contaminants originally produced by buried waste make their way to plants, animals and humans.
A containment system including a barrier in accordance with the principles of the present invention addresses these and other concerns of buried waste by isolating a containment zone of interest, which provides several significant advantages. The systems, methods and apparatus of the present invention are capable of creating a continuous barrier of various sizes and configurations. The barriers can be installed in both saturated and unsaturated zones of interest and in a variety of geologies from soft soil to hard rock. Systems and methods for the verification of the barrier installation as well as structural continuity of the barrier are also included within the scope of the present invention.
As used herein, “buried waste ” refers to, without limitation: construction and demolition materials such as lumber and concrete blocks; laboratory equipment such as glassware and tubing; process equipment such as valves, ion exchange resins, and heat exchangers; maintenance equipment such as oils and greases; decontamination materials such as paper, rags and plastics; hazardous and radioactive materials; and any other type of waste or garbage which is buried in the ground. The chemicals and other substances produced by buried waste which leach into the surrounding soil and groundwater are also encompassed by the term buried waste. “Zone of interest ” refers to an area or volume of earth containing buried waste. A containment system is typically designed to isolate the zone of interest from the surrounding earth and water such that the buried waste and associated leachate is geographically confined to the zone of interest.
The present invention is described in terms of diagrams and figures. Using the diagrams and figures in this manner to present the invention should not be construed as limiting its scope. Rather, the diagrams and figures are intended to be exemplary embodiments of the present invention. Additionally, the diagrams and figures are not necessarily drawn to scale. It will be appreciated that other embodiments of the present invention are also be contemplated and such other embodiments are within the scope of the present invention.
One type of micro tunneling device 300 is known as a micro tunnel boring machine, or micro TBM. In a currently preferred embodiment, micro tunneling device 300 comprises an auger head 302 or the like for rotary excavation of soil 104. However, it is contemplated that the inventive barrier system may be installed in any of a number of different types of soil and rock, or combinations thereof. Accordingly, installation of the containment or barrier system by other excavation devices including, but not limited to, ‘double-tube down the hole’ drills (preferred for hard soil and soft rock), rotary percussion drills (preferred for hard rock), Multi-face Tunnel Boring Machines, Multi-face Shielded Tunnel Boring Machines, a Shielded Tunnel Boring Machine coupled with a Horizontal Cutting Screw Auger, Pipe Propulsion, Curved Pipe Propulsion, Trench Cutting, and the like is contemplated as being within the scope of this invention. Attainable boring and installation speeds are about 50 meters/day of tunnel through soft soil, about 25 meters/day of tunnel through hard soil/soft rock, and about 8 meters/day of tunnel through hard rock.
In order to contain the buried waste in a zone of interest, micro tunneling device 300 serially drills a plurality of parallel tunnels underneath the zone of interest. Preferably, each tunnel is substantially circular in cross-section. However, this invention contemplates as within its scope tunnels of a wide variety of other, different cross sectional shapes. Each tunnel of
A number of bleed slots 405 may be formed in the wall of internal channel 404. If a sealant, such as grout or bentonite is injected into the central bore 403, it may pass through the bleed slots 405 into the interlock space allowing both bore 403 and the interlock volume to be filled and sealed in one operation. A portion of the casings 400A may be constructed of a semipermeable material such as a porous ceramic that allows air to pass therethrough. As the central bore 403 is filled with sealant, displaced air exits the casing 400A through the semipermeable material, which then becomes impermeable due to the filling of the pores therein with sealant. This reduces the problem of voiding and bubbles during sealant, such as grout, injection.
One potential problem with the emplacement of casing sections is the introduction of extraneous material, such as dirt or debris, into the channels of female interlock structures 402B and 402C which dirt or debris may prevent entry of a male interlock structure 402A. Techniques for reducing this problem are included within the scope of the present invention. Casing 400B includes a frangible seal 406 located over the external openings of the female interlock structures 402C. Frangible seal 406 may be constructed of any suitable material, such as a ceramic, aggregate, thin section of frangible metal, a membrane (such as neoprene) or a selectively permeable material that may aid in using the casing for treating the zone of interest 100 (where the channels of female interlock structures 402B or 402C are not used for the interlock itself). As the casing 400B is emplaced, the frangible seal prevents foreign material from entering the female interlock 402C. As an adjacent casing, 400B is emplaced, the male interlock structure 402A thereof is inserted through access slot 455 down the length of female interlock structure 402B. The frangible seal 406 is broken, displaced, or cut by the male interlock, which may be assisted by a sharpened or slanted leading edge 411, such as that shown in
It will be appreciated that frangible seal 406 may include a seal, such as a neoprene membrane may be placed over the access slot 455. As the seal 406 is cut by the sharpened leading edge, it remains in place to form a seal between the female interlock structure 402B and the inserted male interlock structure 402A. This seal allows the enclosed volume of the bore 403 and interlock to be known, as leakage is prevented therefrom during filling. The volume of sealant injected therein may be measured to determine if voiding or other variances are occurring that may reduce the effectiveness of the barrier 500 and appropriate corrective measures taken.
Another technique for dealing with the problem of foreign material is illustrated by casing 400C. Female interlock structure 402D is filled with a sealant, such as a soft grout 410. As the casing is emplaced, foreign material is unable to enter the prefilled female interlock 402D. As an adjacent casing, 400C is emplaced, the male interlock structure 402A thereof is inserted through access slot 455 down the length of female interlock 402D. The sealant, such as soft grout 410, is displaced (which may be assisted by sharpened or slanted leading edge 411 shown in
Casing embodiments similar to those depicted as 400D and 400E may ease manufacturing as they are capable of construction with all welding performed external to the pipe. For example, the internal tube 440 or central chamber and 420 and female channels 422 may be constructed by welding flat pieces to form the desired shapes. Additional pieces may then be welded to the internal structures to form the external surface of the casing 400. Where the curved pieces are used, accurate jigs may be utilized to maintain proper positioning. This allows the labor cost associated with the construction of a casing to be reduced, as well as eliminating a need for specialized welding tools to operate within the interlocks. It will, of course, be appreciated that internal structures may be formed by a suitable method, such as welding, and then slidably inserted down into a casing 400 and welded of other wise bonded thereto, whereupon access slots 455 may be cut into the external surface of the casing 400.
Casing embodiments that feature a central chamber 420 or internal tube 440 also add another level of flexibility for monitoring underground conditions and remediation.
As illustrated by
Once the effluent has passed through the reactive layers, it may be allowed to exit the casing through bottom longitudinal opening 443C (again through opening or vias, not shown), or it may flow along the floor of internal tube 440, or lower internal chamber 441C (where lower longitudinal opening 455C is sealed) to a collection point, such as central tunnel 202 (see
As seismic activity occurs, the barrier 500 may shift, settle or otherwise move. It may therefor be advantageous to provide mechanisms to accommodate slight movements of casings 400 to occur without breaking the continuity of the barrier 500, or to facilitate repair thereof. Where casing 400 sections are welded together, movement may require rewelding any broken seals.
Male interlock 402A is at least partially embedded in sealant 460 to form an impermeable seal within the interlock space 462. Sealant 460 may be a material with a degree of elasticity that allows for some movement of the male interlock 402A with respect to the interlock space 462. For example, bentonite, waxes, rubbers, polysiloxane and polymeric sealants may provide a seal that tolerates some movement of the embedded male interlock 402A, without breaking the impermeable seal. Leaving additional space free of sealant in the interlock space 462 improves the ability for these elastic sealants to a maintain a seal. Some of these sealants 460, such as the thermoplastic polymers may also possess a degree of “self-healing ” ability being able to slowly flow or move to recreate a breached seal without further intervention.
Where sealant 460 is a thermoplastic material, such as wax or a thermoplastic polymer, sealant 460 may be placed in the interlock space 462 prior to the emplacement of the casing 400 into the barrier 500. Sealant 460 may be conformed around the periphery, or in a portion, of the interlock space 462 to allow the male interconnect 462 to be inserted therein without interference. Heat may then be applied to soften the thermoplastic sealant, causing it to flow into place, creating an impermeable seal between adjacent casings 400. If the impermeable seal is later breached by seismic activity or another phenomenon, that does not damage the casings 400, the sealant may be reheated, causing it to reflow and reestablish the impermeable seal. Heat may be applied in any suitable manner, such as by pumping heated air or steam into the central bore 403 or central tube 440 of a casing 400 or by heating the casing 400 in the instance it is constructed of thermally conductive materials.
Where a more traditional sealant 460, such as grout or bentonite clay, is used, a specialized repair apparatus, such as a remote controlled robot that fits inside a casing 400, may be moved to the location of any void. Repairs may then be effected by filling the void with additional sealant, similar to the process of dental filling.
The multiple female interconnects 402B, 402C and 402D of the casings of the present invention provide additional flexibility in assembling a barrier 500. For example, where a barrier is placed in an area that limits the ability to recover a failed auger head, boring head or drill bit, such as a around a zone of interest that contains radioactive material, or where the cost of recovering an auger head, boring head or drill bit or replacing a failed casing 400 are high, the barrier 500 may be constructed by working around the failed section, as depicted in
The multiple interconnect directions of the casing of the present invention may also be used to create barrier walls, such as laterally stepped barrier wall 502 of
In addition to their respective sensing functions, presence/concentration sensor 606, distribution sensor 610, and RDM sensor 612 may be configured to feed data to real-time data management system 614 for processing and analysis. Real-time data management system 614 may be a computer system integrating hardware, software, sensor output, positioning information and data analysis functions.
A variety of different sensor types are contemplated as being suitable for performing the functions of contaminant presence/concentration sensor 606, distribution sensor 610, and RDM sensor 612. In particular, the function of contaminant presence/concentration sensor 606 may be performed by a surface acoustic wave (SAW) sensor or solid state sensor such as a field effect transistor (FET), as well as by Fourier transform infrared spectrometry (FTIR), time domain electromagnetics, or the like. Time domain electromagnetics, which measure presence, location, and concentration of contaminants by measuring conductivity and dielectric contrasts of the medium in which they are located, are also suitable for performing the spatial distribution measurement function of distribution sensor 610. The radiation detection and measurement functions of RDM sensor 612 may be performed by gamma-ray spectrometry, plastic scintillators, scintillating fibers, miniature chamber detectors, or the like. Note that this invention contemplates as within its scope various other types of sensors that will provide the functionality described herein.
As indicated in
Joint integrity may be evaluated in any desired and appropriate way. For example, acoustic/ultrasonic time domain reflectometry sensors that detect cracks and large voids in structures such as smart casing section 400G may be used. Also, known optical fiber sensors that employ fiber optic principles to make strain measurements in a casing section 400 and thereby detect the onset and growth of voids and cracks in that casing 400 may be used. Because joint integrity can be meaningfully evaluated in a variety of different ways, any sensor type that would be suitable for directly or indirectly measuring and evaluating joint integrity may be used. Note also that the aforementioned sensor types are equally suitable for evaluating the integrity of the structure of smart casing section 400G itself, that is, they are not limited solely to joint integrity applications.
In addition to containing sensors for evaluating the structure of casing 400 and joint integrity, a smart casing section 400G may also include a migration sensor 620 for detecting migration and leakage of leachate 106 and contaminants 108. A migration sensor 620 may be a sensor incorporating fiber optic coupled optical spectroscopy functionality for measuring, for example, volatile organic compounds (VOCs) that may have leaked through smart casing section 400G. However other migration sensors suitable for measuring chemical migration, and emission of VOCs and the like are contemplated as being within the scope of the present invention. As indicated in
Smart casing section 400G may also include one or more predictive sensors 622 for identifying failure precursors in barrier 500 or in a casing section 400G. One possible predictive sensor 622 measures changes in the dielectric permeability and/or permittivity of the barrier 500. Alternatively, predictive sensor 622 could be an electrical source and corresponding antenna arrays (not shown) that may be used to measure changes in resistivity of barrier 500. A change in resistivity from a baseline measurement taken at time of installation of barrier 500 would indicate a break.
Predictive sensors 622 may also be a sacrificial cathode or the like for detecting conduction paths through a casing 400. Existence of a conduction path through a casing section 400 may indicate that a failure of that casing section 400 will ultimately occur. Because galvanic action only occurs when there is a conduction path, galvanic action at the sacrificial cathode serves to predict such failure. This will provide further protection against corrosion. Alternatively, an external galvanic potential source may be provided to effect such protection. As with the other sensors, predictive sensor 622 may feed data to real time data management system 614 for processing.
Using a barrier 500 that contains sensors as outlined in the preceding paragraphs, a number of tests may be conducted to assure the integrity of a barrier. For example, interlock void defects may be detected by conducting an ultrasonic or other nondestructive line scan between the wall of casing 400 and the male interlock structure 402A to verify seal integrity by lack of void defects in the interlock sealant within the female interlock structure 402B, 402C, and 402D. Multiple scans may be conducted across different casing profiles. Similarly, interlock bonding defects may be detected by conducting an ultrasonic or other nondestructive line scan between the wall of casing 400 and the male interlock structure 402A to verify seal integrity by lack of bonding defects at the casing 400 wall or male interlock structure 402A surface. Casing end joints (where casing sections are joined end to end) defects may also be detected by conducting an ultrasonic or other nondestructive line scan across casing end joints to verify seal integrity by lack of void or bonding defects. Multiple scans may be done for each of these tests.
Smart casings 400G may also be used to monitor a zone of interest 100 for criticality. For example, where a zone of interest 100 contains fissable isotopes, these can achieve a critical state, if present in sufficient quantity and concentration. Using RDMs and presence/concentration sensors on or connected to the barrier 500, the concentrations of such isotopes in the zone of interest may be monitored to provide potential warnings prior to reaching a critical state.
It will be appreciated that using a barrier constructed according to the present invention, different treatment options may be practiced. For example, the flow rate of leachate or other effluent through a zone of interest may be controlled by restricting flow through a barrier 500. This allows the saturation rate of the zone of interest 100 (or the saturation rate of a semipermeable portion of the barrier 500 surface) to be controlled, optimizing the treatment rate.
The present invention has been described in terms of buried waste, but the systems and methods of the present invention have other applications. For instance, a barrier 500 having perforated or semipermeable casings may be using in mining operations to collect the minerals of interest. For example, a barrier 500 may be constructed in a formation from which the mineral of interest may be leached into the casings. When the collection of the mined material reaches a predetermined level, it is easily extracted from collectors in the casings. Other applications include perforated barriers 500 used for agricultural purposes. For example, the water used to irrigate an agricultural area typically drains in a particular location. A containment barrier 500 having perforated casings can be installed in the drainage area, acting similar to drainage tiles to direct the flow of drainage as desired. Casings 400 may also be used to stabilize earth or subterranean formations or provide structural support for construction of buildings, tunnels or other manmade structures, to divert groundwater, or to provide hydrological stabilization during dam construction.
It will be apparent that details of the apparatus and methods herein described can be varied considerably without departing from the concept and scope of the invention. The claims alone define the scope of the invention as conceived and as described herein.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US910421 *||Feb 1, 1908||Jan 19, 1909||Interlocking Tube Company||Interlocking construction for docks, piers, jetties, building-foundations, &c.|
|US2101285||Jan 31, 1936||Dec 7, 1937||Fenton Stevens Edwin||Tubular interlocking piling|
|US3411305||Jan 23, 1967||Nov 19, 1968||Cella Alexander A||Tubular interlocking piling for wall assemblies|
|US4632602||Mar 23, 1984||Dec 30, 1986||Hovnanian Vahak S||Chemical dump site containment floor|
|US4676693||Nov 30, 1984||Jun 30, 1987||S: Kajima Corporation||Method of confirming position of drain material left and apparatus for confirming same in drain engineering method|
|US4947470||Feb 14, 1989||Aug 7, 1990||Southwest Research Institute||System for locating leaks in a geomembrane-lined impoundment or landfill filled with material|
|US5013185||Mar 23, 1988||May 7, 1991||Osamu Taki||Multi-shaft auger apparatus and process for fixation of soils containing toxic wastes|
|US5030034 *||Jan 19, 1989||Jul 9, 1991||Bodine Albert G||Soil pollution monitoring system and apparatus|
|US5106233||Aug 25, 1989||Apr 21, 1992||Breaux Louis B||Hazardous waste containment system|
|US5180251||Jun 11, 1991||Jan 19, 1993||Paurat F||Underground protection underneath a dump|
|US5199816||Jun 5, 1991||Apr 6, 1993||Paurat F||System for isolating a dump|
|US5240348||Feb 5, 1992||Aug 31, 1993||Louis Breaux||Methods of hazardous waste containment|
|US5280243||Apr 16, 1993||Jan 18, 1994||Numar Corporation||System for logging a well during the drilling thereof|
|US5305798||Jul 30, 1992||Apr 26, 1994||Driver F Thomas||Two-wall leakage detection system for a pipe|
|US5354149||Jul 19, 1993||Oct 11, 1994||Barrier Member Containment Corp.||In-ground barrier system with pass-through|
|US5360293 *||Dec 4, 1992||Nov 1, 1994||Barrier Member Containment Corporation||In-ground barrier member interlocking joint and seal system|
|US5388931||Oct 18, 1993||Feb 14, 1995||Carlson; Robert J.||Cutoff wall system to isolate contaminated soil|
|US5460032||Sep 23, 1992||Oct 24, 1995||Burt Troyce Hampton||Impoundment leak detection, location, and containment system|
|US5487622||Apr 23, 1993||Jan 30, 1996||University Of Waterloo||System for treating polluted groundwater|
|US5531895||Jan 18, 1995||Jul 2, 1996||Alford; George||Method and apparatus for installing and removing biologically structured wall systems|
|US5584610 *||Dec 23, 1993||Dec 17, 1996||Simpson; Garland E.||Bulkhead|
|US5716164||Jun 1, 1994||Feb 10, 1998||Foldtani Kutato Es Furo Ket||Process for the local treatment of soil in particular for examination and cleaning of contaminated soil|
|US5758993 *||Jun 11, 1996||Jun 2, 1998||Slurry Systems, Inc.||Method and apparatus for forming successive overlapping voids in the ground along a predetermined course of travel and for producing a subterranean wall therein|
|US5800096 *||Aug 27, 1996||Sep 1, 1998||Barrow; Jeffrey||Subsurface barrier wall and method of installation|
|US5816344||Nov 18, 1996||Oct 6, 1998||Turner; William E.||Apparatus for joining sections of pressurized conduit|
|US5816748||Oct 24, 1995||Oct 6, 1998||Flowtex Technologie-Import Von Kabelverlegemaschinen Gmbh||Method for sealing off ground sites|
|US5905184||May 11, 1998||May 18, 1999||Carter, Jr.; Ernest E.||In situ construction of containment vault under a radioactive or hazardous waste site|
|US5961437||Sep 8, 1997||Oct 5, 1999||Lockheed Martin Idaho Technologies Company||Multi-layer waste containment barrier|
|US6102617||Jan 13, 1998||Aug 15, 2000||Vivian A. Hampton||Impoundment leak detection, location, and containment system and method with mobile sensor|
|US6138754||Nov 18, 1998||Oct 31, 2000||Schlumberger Technology Corporation||Method and apparatus for use with submersible electrical equipment|
|US6281801||Jun 3, 1998||Aug 28, 2001||Bechtel Bwxt Idaho, Llc||System and method for monitoring water content or other dielectric influences in a medium|
|US6427402 *||Oct 25, 2000||Aug 6, 2002||American Piledriving Equipment, Inc.||Pile systems and methods|
|US6648552||Oct 14, 1999||Nov 18, 2003||Bechtel Bwxt Idaho, Llc||Sensor system for buried waste containment sites|
|1||"Subsurface Containment and Monitoring Systems: Barriers and Beyond" Leslie Pearlman, National Network of Environmental Management Studies Fellow for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Mar. 1999.|
|U.S. Classification||405/129.45, 405/129.65, 405/278|
|International Classification||E02D19/18, E02D31/00, B09C1/00, B09B1/00|
|Cooperative Classification||B09B1/00, B09C1/002, E02D19/06, E02D31/006, E02D19/185, E02D19/12|
|European Classification||E02D19/06, E02D19/12, E02D31/00B4, B09C1/00B, E02D19/18B, B09B1/00|
|Dec 6, 2004||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: ENERGY, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF, DISTRICT OF C
Free format text: CONFIRMATORY LICENSE;ASSIGNOR:BECHTEL BWXT IDAHO, LLC;REEL/FRAME:016040/0985
Effective date: 20040908
|Feb 7, 2005||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: BATTELLE ENERGY ALLIANCE, LLC, IDAHO
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:BECHTEL BWXT IDAHO, LLC;REEL/FRAME:016226/0765
Effective date: 20050201
Owner name: BATTELLE ENERGY ALLIANCE, LLC,IDAHO
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:BECHTEL BWXT IDAHO, LLC;REEL/FRAME:016226/0765
Effective date: 20050201
|Nov 23, 2009||REMI||Maintenance fee reminder mailed|
|Apr 18, 2010||LAPS||Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees|
|Jun 8, 2010||FP||Expired due to failure to pay maintenance fee|
Effective date: 20100418