|Publication number||US7043208 B2|
|Application number||US 10/271,280|
|Publication date||May 9, 2006|
|Filing date||Oct 15, 2002|
|Priority date||Oct 15, 2002|
|Also published as||US20040203458|
|Publication number||10271280, 271280, US 7043208 B2, US 7043208B2, US-B2-7043208, US7043208 B2, US7043208B2|
|Inventors||Louis M. Nigra|
|Original Assignee||Motorola, Inc.|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (10), Non-Patent Citations (2), Referenced by (78), Classifications (7), Legal Events (7)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
The present invention relates to operation of a radio communication device. More particularly the invention relates to a method and apparatus to reduce interference in a radio communication device.
In a two-way radio, the frequency bands for receive and transmit operations may overlap for the radio. In this case, when the radio transmitter is operative, signals from the transmitter may be coupled to the radio receiver, causing interference. Although interference can happen when the transmitter and receiver are operating on overlapping carrier frequencies, interference can also occur on interfering intermediate frequencies or baseband frequencies. Direct conversion radios are particularly susceptible to the latter problem. Differences between operational modes may result from the receiver architecture (e.g., superheterodyne), system design (e.g., separate frequency blocks for transmit and receive signals) or transmitter architecture (e.g., direct conversion or frequency offset).
For example, a device can be transmitting on the uplink carrier while monitoring the downlink carrier using the receiver on a nearby frequency, such as is possible in a multimode communication system. In those cases where the downlink frequency is close to the uplink transmission frequency, the communication device can actually interfere with itself. In other words, the transmit power of the device is picked up by, and interferes with, the receiver of the device. In addition, radio self-interference can occur in a Global Positioning System (GPS) wherein the time to correlate a received GPS system signal is long. In this case, the prior art solution is to mute the device transmitter during receiver correlation, which is not acceptable as it limits the use of the device.
In a direct conversion radio, low intermediate frequency (LIF), or very low intermediate frequency (VLIF) radio, a first frequency conversion is performed wherein the carrier RF frequency is demodulated at or near the baseband. Very precise frequency planning is required to implement direct conversion in a radio. Otherwise, intermodulating frequency by-products appear in the form of unwanted spurious signals in an operating passband or receive band of the radio. In particular, where a direct conversion or VLIF receiver operates simultaneously with a co-located transmitter with non-constant envelope modulation, any transmitter signals coupling with the receiver mixer will produce second-order distortion products. The amount of distortion is proportional to the squared-amplitude envelope of the interfering signal, and occurs in the intermediate frequency (IF), which translates to the baseband in direct conversion or VLIF receivers. This can occur even in case where the receiver and transmitter are not functionally related.
In addition, if a received signal level exceeds the operating range of the baseband circuitry of the radio, the receiver performance degrades as a result of the decreasing signal to noise ratio and receiver selectivity. This may occur when interfering signals are very strong compared to the desired on-channel signal and the baseband circuitry becomes saturated as a result of the overload. This results in the desired on-channel signal becoming desensitized. Therefore, it is necessary to limit the interference prior to the baseband circuitry and maintain signal levels within the baseband circuit's operating range. Filter portions of the baseband circuitry can reduce adjacent interference by allowing only the desired on-channel frequency to pass through. However, in direct conversion or VLIF receivers, filtering is of little use as the incoming signal prior to the baseband circuitry comprises the desired monitored signal as well as the interfering signal.
Prior art means currently employed to directly suppress the second order interference involve increasing the isolation between the transmitter and receiver, such as through separate antennas, careful radio architecture layout, increasing selectivity of the receiver, or increasing second-order performance of the mixer. However, the latter may entail reduced gain prior to the mixer, which tends to decrease sensitivity. These prior art means tend to increase cost, weight, size, or decrease performance of the receiver. Another prior art solution seeks to provide simple periodic calibration using DC levels in the IF. However, periodic calibration is still not suitable for the dynamic changes in interference that occurs when an antenna interacts with its surroundings in a mobile environment. In addition, significant DC accuracy is required and DC coupling is required. This is not compatible with direct conversion receivers which strip away the DC component. Still other prior art reject second order interference from a continuous envelope signal with low noise. This is not compatible with the new third generation carrier signals that are amplitude modulated, or those continuous envelope systems with high noise in the receiver IF.
As a result, there is a need for an improved method and apparatus to reduce second order transmit signal interference in a direct conversion, LIF or VLIF receiver. It would also be advantageous to provide this improvement without concern for the radio architecture circuitry layout or component improvements.
The features of the present invention, which are believed to be novel, are set forth with particularity in the appended claims. The invention, together with further objects and advantages thereof, may best be understood by reference to the following description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in the several figures of which like reference numerals identify like elements, and in which:
The present invention provides an improved method and apparatus to reduce second order transmit signal interference in a direct conversion, LIF or VLIF receiver. This is accomplished by estimation and compensation of the second order interference products and characterization of the radio circuitry architecture. As a result, the present invention can provide this improvement without concern for the radio architecture circuitry layout or a requirement for component improvements. The present invention advantageously utilizes existing circuitry in combination with simple software and hardware additions for the interference compensation of a receive signal in a communication device.
The present invention is equally applicable to analog or digital signals. As described herein, signals may be in digital or analog form and in some cases can be real or complex (i.e. separate signal components representing the real and imaginary parts). The digital, analog or complex nature of a signal has no impact on the general signal processing concepts described herein, and if the distinction is relevant to a specific process or embodiment, this is explicitly noted. Furthermore, processing necessary for actual implementation may include functions such as sample rate conversion through decimation, interpolation or other means. The application of such is a well-known aspect of the art of digital processing and is not relevant to the present invention.
The present invention can be applied in any radio receiver's first Intermediate Frequency (IF) circuitry that is low enough in frequency to be susceptible to first mixer second order responses to co-located interfering signals. In practice, only direct conversion receivers, VLIF receivers and LIF receivers are susceptible, depending on how poorly the first IF filtering rejects the second order interferer spectrum produced by the first mixer.
The invention provides transmitter interference suppression by subtracting an estimated replica of the interference from the IF. The estimate is obtained primarily by exploiting the a priori knowledge of the exact transmitter baseband complex envelope (phase and amplitude modulation), by a priori knowledge of the approximate processing that occurs as the signal makes its way to the receiver mixer and the ability to very closely approximate the second order process in the mixer that produces the interference in the direct conversion, VLIF, or LIF radio. The estimate of the interference is further refined in a novel way by using adaptive techniques.
The interference signal passes through, and is modified by, the front end of the receiver, including the net effect of a selectivity represented by a filter 22 and a gain represented by an amplifier 24. At this point, the complex envelope of the interference signal is similar to that of the original transmit baseband signal, but has experienced some distortion, both non-linear (in the Exciter/power amplifier) and linear (phase and amplitude distortion through filtering). Both of these are relatively small effects. However, the transmitted interference signal produces in an output of a mixer 26 a distortion product whose spectrum is at or around DC. This is caused by a square-law response that is essentially independent of frequency offset from the local oscillator 28. This undesired signal's spectrum 40 is at least partially in or near the desired signal's passband 38 in the case of a direct conversion, LIF or VLIF receiver, and is amplified and filtered along with it through a receiver signal processor that includes baseband selectivity 30 and gain 32 stages for filtering and amplifying the receiver signal. Note that
Just prior to the receiver output, an estimate 36 of the second order interference produced in the mixer 26 and modified by the IF response 30 and gain 32 is subtracted in a subtractor 33 from the desired plus interference signal (38 and 40). Preferably, this estimate 36 also includes an estimate of the distortions and non-linearities attributed to the other receiver and transmitter stages prior to the mixer 26. This estimate 36 is provided by an interference estimator 34 which, through static and adaptive processing, optimizes the estimate so as to minimize the residual interference 42 at the receiver output. In effect, the interference estimator statically models the linear and non-linear distortion and non-linear interference effects of the radio elements that produce the second order interference at the mixer 26 output and applies these to the transmit baseband signal. It then adaptively improves this static estimate such that the interference can be subtracted from the receiver baseband signal to provide a desired signal 38 with suppressed interference 42. As an added benefit, the suppression of the interference 42 allows the use of less accurate filtering, gain and mixer stages, since any inadequacy of these elements can be dynamically removed by the interference estimator. The interference estimator provides continuous adaptation to interference using the corrected output signal from subtractor 33 as feedback.
The interference estimator 34 comprises linear and non-linear transfer functions Test(x), Aest(f), γest(x)2 and Best(f), followed by an adaptive filter 100. These transfer functions are approximations to their nominal counterparts T(x), A(f), γ(x)2 and B(f), in the signal path to provide the baseline interference estimate, s(t) which serves as the reference for the adaptive filter 100. Note that although the transfer functions can generally be referred to as “static”, these transfer functions can be dynamically adjusted based on a priori information of various conditions. For example, Test(x) could include a gain factor that is adjusted based on transmitter attenuator settings, calibration factors and the output of a temperature sensor. The term “static” as used herein refers to the four transfer functions not being adaptive through signal feedback.
The adaptive filter 100 is a process that optimizes the estimate of the interfering signal by monitoring the output signal feedback, e(t), which is the difference between the interference signal, i(t), and the interference estimate, i^(t), and adjusting it's filtering parameters, applied to an interference reference through an adaptive control algorithm, to minimize the interference present in the output signal feedback. Adaptive filters themselves are known in the art, and can include an adaptive transversal filter using the LMS (Least Mean Squared) adaptive control algorithm, for example. The adaptive filter 100 shown in
The mixer 26 has both an in-phase and quadrature baseband output where the converted desired signal band is either nominally centered at zero hertz (direct conversion) or offset in frequency for a VLIF receiver. The second order interference product will always be centered at zero hertz. Mixer 26 is normally of the type where the phase quadrature relationship between I and Q outputs are obtained through controlled phase relationships in the input RF and the local oscillator. In this case, the mixer I and Q output signals, ci(t) and cq(t), respectively, each include a desired signal di(t) or dq(t), noise ni(t) or nq(t), and a second order interference component ii(t) or iq(t):
c i(t)=d i(t)+n i(t)+i i(t)
c q( t)=d q( t)+n q( t)+iq( t)
The second order interference components are nominally in phase coherence and differ primarily in signal strength alone. This characteristic is essential to the preferred adaptive filter embodiment to be described later. Phase coherence is a direct result of the interference being the product only of a squaring process applied directly to the RF signal into the mixer and not affected by mixer local oscillator phase relationships. With respect to the low frequency components of interest here, the squaring process is sensitive only to the time-varying amplitude envelope of the RF signal, which is well-known in detection theory, since the I and Q mixer elements internal to mixer 26 are excited by RF signals with identical amplitude envelopes. This is in contrast to the noise and desired signals which are directly converted by the quadrature mixer, and are nominally in phase quadrature and nominally matched in signal strength.
The I channel composite mixer signal, ci(t) passes through analog filtering and analog gain stages prior to analog-to-digital (A/D) conversion. The filtering and gain can involve multiple circuits but is represented as a whole by an element with a linear transfer function of B1i(f). This selectivity is only nominal (i.e. a wide bandwidth relative to the desired signal bandwidth to prevent aliasing in the A/D conversion) and is adequate to prevent interferers from overloading the A/D converter. Following the A/D converter, the estimated interference, i^i(t) provided by the adaptive filter 100 is subtracted from the IF signal in the subtractor, whose output is:
e i(t)=[[d i(t)+n i(t)+i i(t)]*b 1i(t)]*b 2i(t)−i^ i(t)
Where * represents the convolution function, and b1i(t) is the impulse response (Fourier transform) of the transfer function B1i(f). Similarly, b2i(t) is the impulse response of the transfer function B2i(f). The above equation describes the filtering of the composite signal and the subsequent subtraction of the interference estimate.
The filtered error signal is fed back to adaptive filter 100 to serve as the in-phase (real part) error signal. The error signal, with its reduced interference component is also the in-phase or real part of the receiver IF signal and passes on for further signal processing.
The Q channel composite mixer signal, cq(t) is processed in a similar way, where the error signal serves as the quadrature or imaginary part of the error and receiver IF signals. The quadrature channel error signal is:
e q(t)=[[d q(t)+n q(t)+i q(t)]*b1q(t)]*b2q(t)−i^hd q(t)
with the notation conventions previously mentioned.
The adaptive filter is known in the art, but a brief description of its operation is provided here. The adaptive filter will act approximately as a linear filter, processing the local interference estimate, s(t) to produce the complex interference estimate for the two channels. This is not strictly a linear process because the parameters of the filter can be continuously varying as the filter automatically adapts its parameters. It is approximately linear because the rate of adaptation is much slower than the response time of the filter. The adaptive filter's adaptation algorithm adjusts the filter such that the error signal is minimized in some sense. Since the adaptive filter's interference estimate, i^q(t) is a modified version of the interference reference s(t), only those components of the composite channel signal that correlate with the reference signal will be affected when the estimate is subtracted from the composite. Therefore, the desired and noise signal components are unaffected.
The adaptive filter can be of a variety of types described in the literature, and for a complex IF (i.e. in-phase and quadrature channels) shown in
A unique implementation of the complex adaptive filter of
In order to scale the interference optimally for each channel, the output of the filter passes through two multipliers, one for the I channel estimate and one for the Q channel estimate. The coefficients are independently and adaptively adjusted by the correlation multiplier 41,42 and integrator 43,44 to minimize the corresponding I or Q channel error. In fact, these two circuits, each comprising the scale factor 45, μ2, a correlation multiplier 41(42), an integrator 43(44) and a scaling multiplier 46(47) are trivial forms of an LMS adaptive filter having a single tap. Therefore, this embodiment of the adaptive filter function required in the embodiment of
In practice, although nominally matched, the two channels will have slight differences in their transfer functions. The embodiment of
If channel frequency response mismatch were severe enough to where the embodiment of
The present invention also includes a method for reducing interference from the transmitter in a received signal in a communication device having a co-located transmitter and receiver, as represented by the flow chart of
The interference signal can be varying, and therefore it is preferred to add a step 66 of adaptive filtering the estimated interference signal using corrected feedback control from the receiver signal to dynamically minimize the interference.
There are several portions of the receiver with which the transmitted signal can interact. The effects of each are different, and the interaction therebetween can carry varying degrees of significance. In general the receiver portion include the receiver front end transfer function which can include the antenna switching, the mixer, and the receiver baseband transfer function which can include the receiver back end. Preferably, the characterizing step includes characterizing each of the receiver front end transfer function, the second-order non-linear operation of a mixer of the receiver, and the receiver baseband transfer function.
Similarly, the transmitter interference signal can be applied, and feedback derived, from any point in the receiver signal path. Preferably, this correction is applied after the mixer, which is the worst offender in contributing to interference. In a preferred embodiment, the characterizing step includes characterizing the transfer function of the receiver front end, mixer and baseband, and the subtracting step is applied after receiver baseband signal processing, and wherein the feedback control of the adaptive filtering step is supplied from the receiver signal after the subtracting stage.
The present invention is unique in the solution provided for the problem of adaptive interference cancellation of second order distortion found in a direct conversion, VLIF or LIF receivers from a co-located transmitter. The present invention is applicable to constant or complex envelope modulation systems and is usable in systems with signal levels well below the noise in the receiver IF. In application, the present invention is best utilized in a direct conversion, VLIF or LIF radio. One important application for this invention is the case of an auxiliary receiver such as a Global Positioning System (GPS) direct conversion, LIF or VLIF receiver integrated with a radio transceiver. A GPS receiver, where the time to correlate a received GPS system signal is long, may require the muting of the device transmitter. For example, in low duty cycle transmission, blanking GPS reception during transmission is one way of dealing with the interference without significant performance degradation. However, blanking GPS reception could cause significant performance degradation in a transceiver whose air interface requires a high transmission duty cycle such as North American Digital Cellular (NADC) and GSM Enhanced General Packet Radio Service (EGPRS), for example, and is not feasible for continuous transmission such as Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA) and Wideband CDMA (WCDMA). The present invention provides a solution to this GPS problem. However, the present invention also has application in any multimode communication system wherein a reception frequency is nearby a simultaneous wideband transmission frequency. In addition, the ever-increasing capabilities of digital signal processor technology in radio devices allows for the simultaneous measurements and operation of the different modes of the operation of the communication device to provide continuous, adaptive, seamless interference control.
Although the invention has been described and illustrated in the above description and drawings, it is understood that this description is by way of example only and that numerous changes and modifications can me made by those skilled in the art without departing from the broad scope of the invention. Although the present invention finds particular use in portable cellular radiotelephones, the invention could be applied to any wireless communication device, including pagers, GPS locators, electronic organizers, and computers. Applicants' invention should be limited only by the following claims.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US5001747||Jan 22, 1990||Mar 19, 1991||Racal Data Communications Inc.||Frequency offset estimator for data modem|
|US5414766||Feb 23, 1993||May 9, 1995||Siemens Telecommunicazioni S.P.A.||Process and device for adaptive digital cancellation of the echo generated in time-varying telephone connections|
|US5526426||Nov 8, 1994||Jun 11, 1996||Signalworks||System and method for an efficiently constrained frequency-domain adaptive filter|
|US5579347||Dec 28, 1994||Nov 26, 1996||Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson||Digitally compensated direct conversion receiver|
|US5850421||Apr 23, 1996||Dec 15, 1998||Racal-Datacom, Inc.||Method and apparatus for estimating clock slew and carrier translation|
|US6516183 *||Sep 10, 1999||Feb 4, 2003||Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ)||Method and apparatus for disturbance compensation of a direct conversion receiver in a full duplex transceiver|
|US6546099||May 22, 1997||Apr 8, 2003||Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.||Arrangement for suppressing an interfering component of an input signal|
|US20040106381 *||Sep 5, 2003||Jun 3, 2004||Engim Incorporated||Transmit signal cancellation in wireless receivers|
|US20050170780||Jan 30, 2004||Aug 4, 2005||Harris Corporation||Communications channel characterization device and associated methods|
|WO2001020795A2||Aug 29, 2000||Mar 22, 2001||Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ)||Apparatus for interference compensation of a direct conversion transceiver and method|
|1||B. Farhang-Boroujeny, "Adaptive Filters Theory and Applications", 1998, pp. 1-21.|
|2||Haykin, Simon "Adaptive Filter Theory." Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River 3rd Edition, 1996, pp. 50-56.|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US7400863 *||Feb 14, 2005||Jul 15, 2008||Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications Japan, Inc.||Switch apparatus, switchable power amplification apparatus, and mobile communication terminal apparatus using the same|
|US7421036 *||Jan 16, 2007||Sep 2, 2008||Parkervision, Inc.||Systems and methods of RF power transmission, modulation, and amplification, including transfer function embodiments|
|US7647030||Dec 12, 2006||Jan 12, 2010||Parkervision, Inc.||Multiple input single output (MISO) amplifier with circuit branch output tracking|
|US7672650||Dec 12, 2006||Mar 2, 2010||Parkervision, Inc.||Systems and methods of RF power transmission, modulation, and amplification, including multiple input single output (MISO) amplifier embodiments comprising harmonic control circuitry|
|US7750733||Jul 15, 2008||Jul 6, 2010||Parkervision, Inc.||Systems and methods of RF power transmission, modulation, and amplification, including embodiments for extending RF transmission bandwidth|
|US7835709||Aug 23, 2006||Nov 16, 2010||Parkervision, Inc.||RF power transmission, modulation, and amplification using multiple input single output (MISO) amplifiers to process phase angle and magnitude information|
|US7844235||Dec 12, 2006||Nov 30, 2010||Parkervision, Inc.||RF power transmission, modulation, and amplification, including harmonic control embodiments|
|US7885682||Mar 20, 2007||Feb 8, 2011||Parkervision, Inc.||Systems and methods of RF power transmission, modulation, and amplification, including architectural embodiments of same|
|US7911272||Sep 23, 2008||Mar 22, 2011||Parkervision, Inc.||Systems and methods of RF power transmission, modulation, and amplification, including blended control embodiments|
|US7929989||Mar 20, 2007||Apr 19, 2011||Parkervision, Inc.||Systems and methods of RF power transmission, modulation, and amplification, including architectural embodiments of same|
|US7932776||Dec 23, 2009||Apr 26, 2011||Parkervision, Inc.||RF power transmission, modulation, and amplification embodiments|
|US7937106||Aug 24, 2006||May 3, 2011||ParkerVision, Inc,||Systems and methods of RF power transmission, modulation, and amplification, including architectural embodiments of same|
|US7945224||Aug 24, 2006||May 17, 2011||Parkervision, Inc.||Systems and methods of RF power transmission, modulation, and amplification, including waveform distortion compensation embodiments|
|US7949365||Mar 20, 2007||May 24, 2011||Parkervision, Inc.|
|US8013675||Jun 19, 2008||Sep 6, 2011||Parkervision, Inc.||Combiner-less multiple input single output (MISO) amplification with blended control|
|US8026764||Dec 2, 2009||Sep 27, 2011||Parkervision, Inc.||Generation and amplification of substantially constant envelope signals, including switching an output among a plurality of nodes|
|US8031804||Aug 24, 2006||Oct 4, 2011||Parkervision, Inc.||Systems and methods of RF tower transmission, modulation, and amplification, including embodiments for compensating for waveform distortion|
|US8036306||Feb 28, 2007||Oct 11, 2011||Parkervision, Inc.||Systems and methods of RF power transmission, modulation and amplification, including embodiments for compensating for waveform distortion|
|US8050353||Feb 28, 2007||Nov 1, 2011||Parkervision, Inc.||Systems and methods of RF power transmission, modulation, and amplification, including embodiments for compensating for waveform distortion|
|US8059749||Feb 28, 2007||Nov 15, 2011||Parkervision, Inc.||Systems and methods of RF power transmission, modulation, and amplification, including embodiments for compensating for waveform distortion|
|US8081929 *||Jun 5, 2008||Dec 20, 2011||Broadcom Corporation||Method and system for optimal frequency planning for an integrated communication system with multiple receivers|
|US8126030||Aug 31, 2005||Feb 28, 2012||Motorola Mobility, Inc.||Multi-mode wireless communication device and method|
|US8175535||Feb 27, 2008||May 8, 2012||Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ)||Active cancellation of transmitter leakage in a wireless transceiver|
|US8233858||Dec 12, 2006||Jul 31, 2012||Parkervision, Inc.||RF power transmission, modulation, and amplification embodiments, including control circuitry for controlling power amplifier output stages|
|US8280321||Nov 15, 2006||Oct 2, 2012||Parkervision, Inc.||Systems and methods of RF power transmission, modulation, and amplification, including Cartesian-Polar-Cartesian-Polar (CPCP) embodiments|
|US8306563 *||Dec 21, 2009||Nov 6, 2012||Adc Telecommunications, Inc.||Method and apparatus for muting a digital link in a distributed antenna system|
|US8315336||May 19, 2008||Nov 20, 2012||Parkervision, Inc.||Systems and methods of RF power transmission, modulation, and amplification, including a switching stage embodiment|
|US8334722||Jun 30, 2008||Dec 18, 2012||Parkervision, Inc.||Systems and methods of RF power transmission, modulation and amplification|
|US8351870||Nov 15, 2006||Jan 8, 2013||Parkervision, Inc.||Systems and methods of RF power transmission, modulation, and amplification, including cartesian 4-branch embodiments|
|US8391818 *||Apr 2, 2010||Mar 5, 2013||Panasonic Corporation||Second-order distortion correcting receiver and second-order distortion correcting method|
|US8406711||Aug 30, 2006||Mar 26, 2013||Parkervision, Inc.||Systems and methods of RF power transmission, modulation, and amplification, including a Cartesian-Polar-Cartesian-Polar (CPCP) embodiment|
|US8410849||Mar 22, 2011||Apr 2, 2013||Parkervision, Inc.||Systems and methods of RF power transmission, modulation, and amplification, including blended control embodiments|
|US8428527||Aug 30, 2006||Apr 23, 2013||Parkervision, Inc.||RF power transmission, modulation, and amplification, including direct cartesian 2-branch embodiments|
|US8433264||Nov 15, 2006||Apr 30, 2013||Parkervision, Inc.||Multiple input single output (MISO) amplifier having multiple transistors whose output voltages substantially equal the amplifier output voltage|
|US8447248||Nov 15, 2006||May 21, 2013||Parkervision, Inc.||RF power transmission, modulation, and amplification, including power control of multiple input single output (MISO) amplifiers|
|US8461924||Dec 1, 2009||Jun 11, 2013||Parkervision, Inc.||Systems and methods of RF power transmission, modulation, and amplification, including embodiments for controlling a transimpedance node|
|US8502600||Sep 1, 2011||Aug 6, 2013||Parkervision, Inc.||Combiner-less multiple input single output (MISO) amplification with blended control|
|US8548093||Apr 11, 2012||Oct 1, 2013||Parkervision, Inc.||Power amplification based on frequency control signal|
|US8577313||Nov 15, 2006||Nov 5, 2013||Parkervision, Inc.||Systems and methods of RF power transmission, modulation, and amplification, including output stage protection circuitry|
|US8626093||Jul 30, 2012||Jan 7, 2014||Parkervision, Inc.||RF power transmission, modulation, and amplification embodiments|
|US8639196||Jan 14, 2010||Jan 28, 2014||Parkervision, Inc.||Control modules|
|US8724492||Apr 8, 2011||May 13, 2014||Motorola Mobility Llc||Method and apparatus for multi-radio coexistence on adjacent frequency bands|
|US8755454||Jun 4, 2012||Jun 17, 2014||Parkervision, Inc.||Antenna control|
|US8761708 *||Jul 9, 2012||Jun 24, 2014||Mstar Semiconductor, Inc.||Direct conversion receiver and calibration method thereof|
|US8766717||Aug 2, 2012||Jul 1, 2014||Parkervision, Inc.||Systems and methods of RF power transmission, modulation, and amplification, including varying weights of control signals|
|US8767869||Aug 16, 2012||Jul 1, 2014||Qualcomm Incorporated||Joint linear and non-linear cancellation of transmit self-jamming interference|
|US8781418||Mar 21, 2012||Jul 15, 2014||Parkervision, Inc.||Power amplification based on phase angle controlled reference signal and amplitude control signal|
|US8884694||Jun 26, 2012||Nov 11, 2014||Parkervision, Inc.||Systems and methods of RF power transmission, modulation, and amplification|
|US8892031 *||May 31, 2011||Nov 18, 2014||Commissariat A L'energie Atomique Et Aux Energies Alternatives||Method of securing a wireless communication, receiver device and communication system implementing this method|
|US8907842 *||Jul 17, 2012||Dec 9, 2014||Raytheon Company||Method and apparatus for attenuating a transmitted feedthrough signal|
|US8913691||Aug 21, 2013||Dec 16, 2014||Parkervision, Inc.||Controlling output power of multiple-input single-output (MISO) device|
|US8913974||Jan 23, 2013||Dec 16, 2014||Parkervision, Inc.||RF power transmission, modulation, and amplification, including direct cartesian 2-branch embodiments|
|US9094085||May 10, 2013||Jul 28, 2015||Parkervision, Inc.||Control of MISO node|
|US9106316||May 27, 2009||Aug 11, 2015||Parkervision, Inc.||Systems and methods of RF power transmission, modulation, and amplification|
|US9106500||Sep 13, 2012||Aug 11, 2015||Parkervision, Inc.||Systems and methods of RF power transmission, modulation, and amplification, including embodiments for error correction|
|US9143088||Dec 15, 2011||Sep 22, 2015||Parkervision, Inc.||Control modules|
|US9143244||Dec 18, 2012||Sep 22, 2015||Nvidia Corporation||Mitigating interference in a wireless communication system|
|US9166528||Jan 6, 2014||Oct 20, 2015||Parkervision, Inc.||RF power transmission, modulation, and amplification embodiments|
|US9178559||Nov 25, 2009||Nov 3, 2015||St Ericsson Sa||Method and system of calibration of a second order intermodulation intercept point of a radio transceiver|
|US9197163||Aug 13, 2013||Nov 24, 2015||Parkvision, Inc.||Systems, and methods of RF power transmission, modulation, and amplification, including embodiments for output stage protection|
|US9197164||Dec 1, 2014||Nov 24, 2015||Parkervision, Inc.||RF power transmission, modulation, and amplification, including direct cartesian 2-branch embodiments|
|US9247506||Mar 14, 2014||Jan 26, 2016||Google Technology Holdings LLC||Method and apparatus for multi-radio coexistence on adjacent frequency bands|
|US9407313||Jul 31, 2014||Aug 2, 2016||Motorola Solutions, Inc.||Radio housing having through-hole connector for coupling accessories|
|US9419692||Apr 29, 2014||Aug 16, 2016||Parkervision, Inc.||Antenna control|
|US9608677||Jul 13, 2015||Mar 28, 2017||Parker Vision, Inc||Systems and methods of RF power transmission, modulation, and amplification|
|US9608679||Nov 7, 2012||Mar 28, 2017||Motorola Solutions, Inc.||Very low intermediate frequency (VLIF) receiver and a method of controlling a VLIF receiver|
|US9614484||May 13, 2014||Apr 4, 2017||Parkervision, Inc.||Systems and methods of RF power transmission, modulation, and amplification, including control functions to transition an output of a MISO device|
|US20050186919 *||Feb 14, 2005||Aug 25, 2005||Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications Japan, Inc.||Switch apparatus, switchable power amplification apparatus, and mobile communication terminal apparatus using the same|
|US20060211389 *||Mar 21, 2005||Sep 21, 2006||Intel Corporation||Method and apparatus for narrowband platform interference mitigation|
|US20070047625 *||Aug 31, 2005||Mar 1, 2007||Klomsdorf Armin W||Multi-mode wireless communication device and method|
|US20070116145 *||Jan 16, 2007||May 24, 2007||Parkervision, Inc.||Systems and methods of RF power transmission, modulation, and amplification, including transfer function embodiments|
|US20090213770 *||Feb 27, 2008||Aug 27, 2009||Fenghao Mu||Active Cancellation of Transmitter Leakage in a Wireless Transceiver|
|US20090302966 *||Jun 5, 2008||Dec 10, 2009||Brima Ibrahim||Method and system for optimal frequency planning for an integrated communication system with multiple receivers|
|US20100039965 *||Feb 13, 2009||Feb 18, 2010||Masazumi Yamazaki||Communications apparatus|
|US20100190519 *||Dec 21, 2009||Jul 29, 2010||Adc Telecommunications, Inc.||Method and apparatus for muting a digital link in a distributed antenna system|
|US20120002770 *||Apr 2, 2010||Jan 5, 2012||Panasonic Corporation||Second-order distortion correcting receiver and second-order distortion correcting method|
|US20130029626 *||Jul 9, 2012||Jan 31, 2013||Mstar Semiconductor, Inc.||Direct Conversion Receiver and Calibration Method Thereof|
|US20130078906 *||May 31, 2011||Mar 28, 2013||Commissariat A L'energie Atomique Et Aux Energies Alternatives||Method of securing a wireless communication, receiver device and communication system implementing this method|
|U.S. Classification||455/78, 455/295, 455/296|
|International Classification||H04B1/52, H04B1/44|
|Oct 15, 2002||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: MOTOROLA, INC., ILLINOIS
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:NIGRA, LOUIS M.;REEL/FRAME:013397/0808
Effective date: 20021014
|Aug 22, 2006||CC||Certificate of correction|
|Sep 28, 2009||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|Dec 13, 2010||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC, ILLINOIS
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:MOTOROLA, INC;REEL/FRAME:025673/0558
Effective date: 20100731
|Oct 2, 2012||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: MOTOROLA MOBILITY LLC, ILLINOIS
Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC.;REEL/FRAME:029216/0282
Effective date: 20120622
|Oct 11, 2013||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 8
|Nov 24, 2014||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: GOOGLE TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS LLC, CALIFORNIA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:MOTOROLA MOBILITY LLC;REEL/FRAME:034432/0001
Effective date: 20141028