Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS7046471 B2
Publication typeGrant
Application numberUS 10/335,801
Publication dateMay 16, 2006
Filing dateJan 2, 2003
Priority dateJul 31, 2002
Fee statusPaid
Also published asUS20040021975
Publication number10335801, 335801, US 7046471 B2, US 7046471B2, US-B2-7046471, US7046471 B2, US7046471B2
InventorsForrest C. Meyer, Tong Shi
Original AssigneeSeagate Technology Llc
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Method and apparatus for utilizing variable tracks per inch to reduce bits per inch for a head
US 7046471 B2
Abstract
A method and disc drive in which tracks and data rates are designated is provided. Under the invention, the write width of a transducer head is determined. A tracks per inch value is adjusted based on the write width, and a data transfer rate is adjusted based on the adjusted tracks per inch value. In particular, the data transfer rate is adjusted such that the adjusted tracks per inch value and the adjusted data transfer rate provide a capacity for the head that is equal to a nominal capacity.
Images(8)
Previous page
Next page
Claims(10)
1. A method of designating tracks and data rates in a data storage device having at least one transducer head having a nominal tracks per inch value, a nominal data transfer rate, and a nominal capacity, the method comprising:
determining a write width for the transducer head;
setting an adjusted tracks per inch value for the transducer head based on the write width wherein the adjusted tracks per inch value is larger than the nominal tracks per inch value;
setting an adjusted data transfer rate for the transducer head based on the adjusted tracks per inch value and the nominal capacity such that the adjusted data transfer rate and the adjusted tracks per inch value provide the nominal capacity for the transducer head wherein the adjusted data transfer rate is smaller than the nominal data transfer rate.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein the nominal capacity is the capacity of a zone on a storage medium.
3. The method of claim 1 wherein there is a servo track width associated with the head and wherein the servo track width is not adjusted when the adjusted tracks per inch value is set.
4. The method of claim 1 further comprising generating a jog table that defines a servo position for each of the designated tracks.
5. A data storage device for storing and retrieving data having a plurality of head/zone combinations with at least one head/zone combination comprising:
a nominal tracks per inch value;
a nominal data transfer rate;
a nominal capacity;
an actual tracks per inch value that is larger than the nominal tracks per inch value; and
an actual data transfer rate that is smaller than the nominal data transfer rate such that the combination of the actual tracks per inch value and the actual data transfer rate provides a capacity that is equal to the nominal capacity for the zone.
6. The data storage device of claim 5 wherein each of the plurality of head/zone combinations has a same servo track width.
7. The data storage device of claim 6 further comprising a table for determining a servo position of a track.
8. A data storage device for storing data on a medium, the data storage device comprising:
a transducer head having a width and capable of writing data in tracks;
transfer rate and track adjustment means for adjusting a tracks per inch value to produce an adjusted tracks per inch value based on the width of the transducer head and for reducing a data transfer rate to produce an adjusted data transfer rate such that the combination of the adjusted tracks per inch value and the adjusted data rate creates a data capacity equal to a nominal data capacity for the transducer head.
9. The data storage device of claim 8 wherein the nominal data capacity is the nominal data capacity associated with a zone on the medium.
10. A method of designating tracks and data rates in a data storage device having at least one transducer head having a nominal tracks per inch value, a nominal data transfer rate, and a nominal capacity, the method comprising:
determining a write width for the transducer head;
setting an adjusted tracks per inch value for the transducer head based on the write width;
setting an adjusted data transfer rate for the transducer head based on the adjusted tracks per inch value and the nominal capacity such that the adjusted data transfer rate and the adjusted tracks per inch value provide the nominal capacity for the transducer head; and
generating a jog table that defines a servo position for each of the designated tracks.
Description
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application claims priority from U.S. Provisional Application 60/400,524 filed on Jul. 31, 2002 for inventors Forrest C. Meyer and Tong Shi and entitled VARIABLE TPI.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates generally to data storage systems, and more particularly to methods for designating tracks and data rates within data storage systems.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

A typical disc drive includes one or more discs having data surfaces for storage of digital information in a plurality of circular, concentric data tracks. The discs are mounted on a spindle motor that causes the discs to spin and the data surfaces of the discs to pass under transducers, which write information to and read information from the data surfaces of the discs.

Areal density is a measure of data bits per unit of surface area of the medium. The areal density is a function of the number of tracks-per-inch (TPI) along the radius of the disc and the number of bits-per-inch (BPI) along the tracks. The bits-per-inch value for a particular track is a function of the data transfer rate, the data encoding rate, the radial position of the track, and the angular speed of the medium. In most disc drives, the TPI and BPI for the disc drive are set based on a desired storage capacity for the drive and the nominal performance characteristics of the transducers. Under some prior art disc drives, different radial zones on the drive were assigned different TPI values to take advantage of different performance characteristics of the transducer at different radial positions along the disc.

Once the TPI and BPI values are designated for a drive, the manufacturer of the transducers attempts to build transducers that can meet the designated TPI and BPI values. Due to variations in the manufacturing process, some of the transducing heads have less than ideal geometry properties, unfit for the TPI requirements. Geometry problems are a major factor impacting transducers' write and read performance.

In the past, heads that could not satisfy the TPI or BPI requirement were discarded. Recently, attempts have been made to overcome the shortcomings of some heads by increasing the storage capacity associated with other heads in the drive to compensate for the lost storage capacity of the under-performing heads. However, this requires the TPI and/or BPI of a number of heads to be changed simply because one head has not met specifications. This is less than desirable. Thus, a system is needed that will result in fewer transducing heads being discarded but at the same time will require as few changes as possible to the capacity design point of the disc drive.

Embodiments of the present invention address these and other problems, and offer other advantages over the prior art.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

A method and disc drive in which tracks and data rates are designated is provided. Under the invention, the write width of a transducer head is determined. A tracks per inch value is adjusted based on the write width, and a data transfer rate is adjusted based on the adjusted tracks per inch value. In particular, the data transfer rate is adjusted such that the adjusted tracks per inch value and the data transfer rate provide a capacity for the head that is equal to a nominal capacity.

Other features and benefits that characterize embodiments of the present invention will be apparent upon reading the following detailed description and review of the associated drawings.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is an isometric view of a disc drive.

FIG. 2 is a top view of a disc surface showing radial zones.

FIG. 3 is a graph showing the distribution of manufactured head widths.

FIG. 4 is a diagram of nominal tracks with guard bands.

FIG. 5 is a diagram of an actual track with larger than nominal guard bands.

FIG. 6 is a diagram showing a track layout after adjustment of the TPI and data transfer rates under embodiments of the present invention.

FIG. 7 is a flow diagram of a method embodying aspects of the present invention.

FIG. 8 is a graph showing the results of OTC testing for a head configured under the present invention versus a head configured under the prior art.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF ILLUSTRATIVE EMBODIMENTS

FIG. 1 is an isometric view of a disc drive 100 in which embodiments of the present invention are useful. Disc drive 100 includes a housing with a base 102 and a top cover (not shown). Disc drive 100 further includes a disc pack 106, which is mounted on a spindle motor (not shown) by a disc clamp 108. Disc pack 106 includes a plurality of individual discs 107, which are mounted for co-rotation about central axis 109. Each disc surface has an associated disc head slider 110 which is mounted to disc drive 100 for communication with the disc surface. In the example shown in FIG. 1, sliders 110 are supported by suspensions 112 which are in turn attached to track accessing arms 114 of an actuator 116. The actuator shown in FIG. 1 is of the type known as a rotary moving coil actuator and includes a voice coil motor (VCM), shown generally at 118. Voice coil motor 118 rotates pivot housing 116 with its attached heads 110 about a pivot shaft 120 to position heads 110 over a desired data track along an arcuate path 122 between a disc inner diameter 124 and a disc outer diameter 126. Voice coil motor 118 is driven by servo electronics, also known as controller, 128 based on signals generated by heads 110 and a host computer (not shown).

In many embodiments, the disc is divided into radial recording zones as shown in FIG. 2. Under such embodiments, each zone 200, 202, 204, and 206 has its own nominal capacity and nominal bits per inch value. The entire drive typically shares the same nominal tracks per inch value, which is set based on the expected write width of the head.

The expected write width of the head is set based on a desired capacity for the drive and the performance specifications of the transducers used in the drive. Ideally, all heads that were manufactured for a line of drives would have the same write width as the expected write width. However, due to variations in the manufacturing process, the write widths of the heads vary as shown in FIG. 3.

In FIG. 3, the widths of the heads are shown along horizontal axis 310 and the number of heads at each width is shown along vertical axis 312. As can be seen in FIG. 3, the heads have a distribution 300 that can be divided into four regions 301, 302, 304 and 306. Heads in regions 301 and 302 are scrapped under the prior art because they fail to meet the signal-to-noise ratio for the drive at the nominal BPI. Heads in region 304 provide a large enough signal-to-noise ratio at the nominal BPI and are able to write tracks at the nominal TPI. Heads that fall in region 304 are used to build disc drives under the prior art. Heads in region 306, although typically able to provide good signal-to-noise ratio, are wide enough to be prone to encroaching data on neighboring tracks. They are also scrapped under the prior art.

The present invention permits far more of the heads in FIG. 3 to be used in the manufacture of disc drives. In particular, heads in region 302 do not have to be scrapped under the present invention because the present invention provides a method that allows the data transfer rates of these heads to be reduced while maintaining the same capacity for the head. By reducing the data transfer rates of these heads, the signal-to-noise performance of the heads can be improved, thereby making it possible for more heads to pass testing. In other embodiments, some heads in region 306 may be used in disc drives by reducing the TPI for that head, thereby increasing the allowable width for the head.

The present invention is able to reduce the data transfer rates of various heads by reclaiming guard band space that is otherwise wasted for narrower heads. This wasted space can be seen by comparing FIGS. 4 and 5.

FIG. 4 is a diagram showing four nominal tracks 400, 402, 404 and 406 having guard bands 408, 410 and 412. Each track has a nominal width 414 and each guard band has a nominal width 416 designed to prevent adjacent track overwrite. FIG. 5 is a diagram showing four actual tracks 500, 502, 504 and 506 written by a head that has a smaller than nominal width. As can be seen in FIG. 5, the narrower width 516 of the head results in larger width 514 for the guard bands 508, 510 and 512.

The present invention reclaims some of the area in the wider guard bands by redefining the track width on a per head and per zone basis. The reclaimed area is then utilized to reduce the data transfer rate set for that head and zone.

FIG. 6 shows an example of a track layout under the present invention after the TPI for the head of FIG. 5 has been increased. In FIG. 6, tracks 600, 602, 604, 606, 608, and 610 are the same width as tracks 500, 502, 504, and 506, but the width 622 of guardbands 612, 614, 616, 618, and 620 is much narrower than the width 514 of guardbands 508, 510, and 512. In fact, the width 622 of the guardbands is equal to the nominal width 416 of the guardbands. The reduction in the guardband widths means that more of the recording surface is available for recording. Under the present invention, this increase in the available recording surface for a head and zone is used to reduce the data transfer rate for that head and zone and thus obtain better signal-to-noise performance for the head.

Note that the reason that many heads were discarded under the prior art was because they were too narrow to form a satisfactory signal-to-noise ratio at the nominal BPI. The present invention takes advantage of the fact that these heads are narrower than nominal to increase the TPI and thus allow for a reduced BPI for the head. Thus, the aspect of the head that would have otherwise caused it to be scrapped is utilized under the present invention to allow the head to be placed in a drive. Also note that the deficiency of one head under the present invention does not mean that the TPI or BPI of other heads must be adjusted. Instead, the present invention maintains the storage capacity of each head and zone at a constant so that the reduction in BPI for one head does not force an increase in TPI or BPI for another head. Instead, the reduction in BPI for a head is entirely made possible by the increase in TPI for the same head. This reduces the complexity of adjusting BPI and TPI for the heads since the total capacity of the drive does not have to be tracked.

FIG. 7 is a flow diagram of a method embodying aspects of the present invention. At step 702 of FIG. 7, the write width of a selected transducer head is determined. This can be done by writing a track on the disc surface and then determining the width of the written track by stepping a read head across the recorded track. Initially, the read head is positioned so that it is not reading any part of the track. The head is then moved radially until the read signal begins to increase. This marks one edge of the track. The head is moved further until the read signal begins to decrease, this marks the other edge of the track. The servo positions of the read head during these two events are then used to determine the write width of the transducer.

Once the writer width has been determined at step 702, the maximum usable TPI for this head and zone is calculated at step 704. This is calculated as the inverse of the sum of the writer width and the nominal guardband size. Based on the calculated TPI from step 704, the data transfer rate, which is linearly proportionate to BPI, is calculated at step 706 to keep a constant bit capacity for the zone. In particular, the data rate can be approximately determined as:

DTR V = DTR N TPI N TPI V
Where:

  • DTRV is the adjusted data transfer rate;
  • DTRN is the nominal data transfer rate;
  • TPIN is the nominal TPI;
  • TPIV is the optimized TPI determined in step 704.
    In actual implementations, the data rate will be further adjusted to maintain the desired capacity. This in some cases can be slightly different from DTRV as changes in data transfer rate do not linearly translate to changes in capacity.

Once the TPI and BPI have been set for this head and zone, a virtual track table (jog table) is constructed to indicate the servo positions of the tracks under the new TPI at step 707. As can be seen in FIGS. 5 and 6, the servo track boundaries 520, 522, 524, 526, and 528 remain constant after the change in TPI. Thus, the servo tracks remain at the same track pitch and thus have the same width before and after the changes to the TPI. As a result, after the TPI has been changed, a table is needed that will convert a desired track address into a servo track position that marks the actual location of the track. This servo track position will consist of a servo track number and some offset value that indicates the position of the center of the desired track within the identified servo track. For example, after the TPI is adjusted, the fourth data track, track 606 is located in the third servo track, servo track 630, at an offset that positions the center of track 606 to the left of the center of servo track 630. Thus, the servo position of the track center for each of the tracks in FIG. 6 must be stored in a jog table so that the head can be properly positioned for any desired track. Alternatively, a computation can be performed when positioning the head to determine the position of a desired track based on the servo pitch and the adjusted TPI.

At step 708, the process determines if there are additional head/zone combinations to be tested. If there are, the process is repeated for the next head/zone combination by returning to step 702. Once all the head/zone combinations have been optimized, the process ends at block 710.

FIG. 8 is a graph showing a comparison of the results of track width testing using fixed nominal TPI and BPI of the prior art and variable TPI and BPI of the present invention. Selected cylinders are shown along horizontal axis 800 while the radial distance that the head can be moved off track before encountering a 10−7 error rate is shown along vertical axis 802.

First, an Off Track Capability (OTC) test was run on a current production disc drive using fixed nominal TPI and BPI for the head. This produced a set of off track capability values, (shown with the hatching) such as values 804, 806 and 808. Then the write width at Cylinder 25000, at approximately zero skew, was measured. The measured width was 80.95% of nominal track width, which was rounded up to 81%.

The nominal TPI for the disc drive was 64,000 TPI giving a track pitch of 15.625 micro-inches. The goal was to reduce the track pitch to 95% of nominal to provide a track pitch of 13.322 micro-inches, resulting in a TPI of 75,062. To maintain a constant areal density, the data transfer rate and therefore the BPI of each zone for the head were decreased by 81/95.

The drive was re-optimized with the reduced BPI for each zone, and OTC was measured resulting in a set of values (shown with no hatching) such as values 810, 812 and 814. Note that the OTC values increased at all cylinders due to improved signal-to-noise performance under the present invention. Note that the head had little or no margin before implementing variable TPI and exhibited good margin after implementation.

In summary, a method of designating tracks 600 and data rates in a disc drive 100 having at least one transducer head 110 is provided. The transducer head 110 has a nominal tracks per inch value, a nominal bits per inch value for any given track and a nominal capacity. The method includes determining the write width 516 for the transducer head 110 and setting an adjusted tracks per inch value for the transducer head 110 based on the write width 516. An adjusted data transfer rate, which in turn determines bits per inch value, is then set for the transducer head 110 based on the adjusted tracks per inch value and the nominal capacity such that the adjusted bits per inch value and the adjusted tracks per inch value provide the nominal capacity for the transducer head 110.

In addition, a data storage device 100 is provided for storing and retrieving data having a plurality of head/zone combinations 200, 202, 204, 206, with at least one head/zone combination having a nominal tracks per inch value, a nominal bits per inch value for any given track and a nominal capacity. The head/zone combination has an actual tracks per inch value that is larger than the nominal tracks per inch value and an actual bits per inch value that is less than the actual bits per inch value such that the combination of the actual tracks per inch value and the actual bits per inch value provides a capacity equal to the nominal capacity.

A further aspect of the invention provides a method of adjusting tracks per inch values and bits per inch values by determining a width 516 of a head 110. The width 516 is used to adjust a tracks per inch value for the head 110. The adjusted tracks per inch value is used to adjust a bits per inch value for the head 110 such that a capacity for the head 110 is unchanged after adjusting the tracks per inch value and the bits per inch value.

It is to be understood that even though numerous characteristics and advantages of various embodiments of the invention have been set forth in the foregoing description, together with details of the structure and function of various embodiments of the invention, this disclosure is illustrative only, and changes may be made in detail, especially in matters of structure and arrangement of parts within the principles of the present invention to the full extent indicated by the broad general meaning of the terms in which the appended claims are expressed. For example, the particular elements may vary depending on the particular application for the memory storage system while maintaining substantially the same functionality without departing from the scope and spirit of the present invention. In addition, although the preferred embodiment described herein is directed to a memory storage system for a magnetic disc drive, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the teachings of the present invention can be applied to optical drive, without departing from the scope and spirit of the present invention.

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US4933795 *Dec 7, 1987Jun 12, 1990Fujitsu America, Inc.Floppy disc read and write head having two separate read and write cores for multiple track density and recording frequencies
US4945427Jun 13, 1988Jul 31, 1990International Business Machines CorporationMagnetic disk recording with variable track width and variable track density
US5537277 *Oct 2, 1991Jul 16, 1996Canon Denshi Kabushiki KaishaMagnetic head for use in converting a low track density disk to a high track density disk
US5596458Dec 19, 1994Jan 21, 1997Integral Peripherals, Inc.Variable zone layout for information storage disk drive
US5870237Jan 30, 1996Feb 9, 1999Integral Peripherals, Inc.Method for variable zone layout for information storage disk drive
US5999351Aug 27, 1996Dec 7, 1999International Business Machines CorporationMulti-track density direct access storage device
US5999352 *May 16, 1997Dec 7, 1999Seagate Technology, Inc.Variable bits per inch recording
US6061195Nov 10, 1997May 9, 2000Mobile Storage Technology, Inv.Variable zone layout and track pitch parameter considerations for information storage disk drive
US6075665Jun 20, 1996Jun 13, 2000International Business Machines CorporationOptimization of multimedia magnetic disk storage devices
US6091559Mar 26, 1997Jul 18, 2000Mobile Storage Technology Inc.Variable zone layout and track pitch parameter considerations for information storage disk drive
US6130796 *Apr 2, 1997Oct 10, 2000Seagate Technology, Inc.Adaptive track pitch control method and apparatus for disk drives
US6137644May 19, 1998Oct 24, 2000International Business Machines CorporationMethod for adaptive formatting and track traversal in data storage devices
US6493176 *Apr 24, 2000Dec 10, 2002Maxtor CorporationDisk drive with variable TPI servo tracks
US6611395 *Nov 3, 1999Aug 26, 2003Hitachi Global Storage Technologies Netherlands B.V.Rotating media recording system with adaptive track density
US6714372 *Sep 28, 2001Mar 30, 2004Western Digital Technologies, Inc.Method of manufacturing a disk drive by measuring the read width in the servo-writer to set the write unsafe limit
US20020036849Jun 4, 2001Mar 28, 2002Quak BengweeAdjusting track density and bit density to provide limited excess capacity in a storage device
EP0347102B1Jun 8, 1989Jun 15, 1994International Business Machines CorporationMagnetic disk file recording with variable track width and variable track density
WO2000001146A1Jun 25, 1999Jan 6, 2000Seagate Technology LlcVariable disc drive cylinder recording system
Non-Patent Citations
Reference
1U.S. Appl. No. 09/885,302, filed Jun. 20, 2001, Ding et al.
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US7525307 *Dec 27, 2006Apr 28, 2009Hitachi Global Storage Technologies Netherlands B.V.System and method for hard drive component testing
US7656598 *Aug 17, 2006Feb 2, 2010Toshiba Storage Device CorporationMethod and apparatus for setting storage capacity of recording media
US7688540Dec 17, 2007Mar 30, 2010Western Digital Technologies, Inc.Disk drive selecting TPI profile by estimating head geometry
US7982993Dec 19, 2008Jul 19, 2011Western Digital Technologies, Inc.Disk drive employing different servo TPI to data TPI ratios across the disk surface
US8031423 *Jun 26, 2009Oct 4, 2011Western Digital Technologies, Inc.Disk drive generating actual data TPI profile by combining segments of predetermined data TPI profiles
US8085487 *Dec 20, 2007Dec 27, 2011Western Digital Technologies, Inc.Blocking formats for a disk drive that reduce performance
US8116020Apr 21, 2009Feb 14, 2012Western Digital Technologies, Inc.Disk drive mapping entries of a defect list into clusters
US8630052Aug 2, 2011Jan 14, 2014Western Digital Technologies, Inc.Disk drive calibrating radial density then adjusting linear density to balance off-track read capability
US8687306Mar 22, 2010Apr 1, 2014Western Digital Technologies, Inc.Systems and methods for improving sequential data rate performance using sorted data zones
US8693133Feb 13, 2013Apr 8, 2014Western Digital Technologies, Inc.Systems and methods for improving sequential data rate performance using sorted data zones for butterfly format
US8699185Dec 10, 2012Apr 15, 2014Western Digital Technologies, Inc.Disk drive defining guard bands to support zone sequentiality when butterfly writing shingled data tracks
US8856438Dec 9, 2011Oct 7, 2014Western Digital Technologies, Inc.Disk drive with reduced-size translation table
US8902527Feb 28, 2014Dec 2, 2014Western Digital Technologies, Inc.Systems and methods for improving sequential data rate performance using sorted data zones
US8970980Jun 27, 2011Mar 3, 2015Western Digital Technologies, Inc.Disk drive evaluating burst metric
US9082458Mar 10, 2014Jul 14, 2015Western Digital Technologies, Inc.Data storage device balancing and maximizing quality metric when configuring arial density of each disk surface
US9099135Mar 11, 2015Aug 4, 2015Seagate Technology LlcDetermining track density capability in a storage device
US9111578Jul 23, 2014Aug 18, 2015Seagate Technology LlcRecording density variation of data tracks
US9213493Dec 16, 2011Dec 15, 2015Western Digital Technologies, Inc.Sorted serpentine mapping for storage drives
US9230605Dec 1, 2014Jan 5, 2016Western Digital Technologies, Inc.Data storage device maximizing areal density based on a target quality metric
US9251844Apr 8, 2015Feb 2, 2016Western Digital Technologies, Inc.Waterfall method and apparatus for a data storage device read system
US9251856Mar 20, 2015Feb 2, 2016Western Digial Technologies, Inc.Read failover method and apparatus for a data storage system
US9324366Apr 1, 2015Apr 26, 2016Seagate Technology LlcControlling track density in storage discs
US9330715Jun 26, 2013May 3, 2016Western Digital Technologies, Inc.Mapping of shingled magnetic recording media
US9466329Sep 12, 2015Oct 11, 2016Seagate Technology LlcMethods of modulating data frequency
US9704519 *Feb 10, 2016Jul 11, 2017Seagate Technology LlcSorting of HAMR read/write heads based on reader and writer widths
US20070217054 *Aug 17, 2006Sep 20, 2007Fujitsu LimitedMethod and apparatus for setting storage capacity of recording media
US20080157760 *Dec 27, 2006Jul 3, 2008Yong ShenSystem and method for hard drive component testing
US20090002872 *Jun 26, 2008Jan 1, 2009Kabushiki Kaisha ToshibaMethod and apparatus for positioning head on data track with a variable track width in a disk drive
Classifications
U.S. Classification360/75, G9B/5.024
International ClassificationG11B5/00, G11B21/02, G11B5/455, G11B5/012
Cooperative ClassificationG11B2005/0013, G11B5/012, G11B5/455, G11B5/09
European ClassificationG11B5/012
Legal Events
DateCodeEventDescription
Jan 2, 2003ASAssignment
Owner name: SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY LLC, CALIFORNIA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:MEYER, FORREST C.;SHI, TONG;REEL/FRAME:013642/0768;SIGNING DATES FROM 20021219 TO 20021224
May 15, 2009ASAssignment
Owner name: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNORS:MAXTOR CORPORATION;SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY LLC;SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL;REEL/FRAME:022757/0017
Effective date: 20090507
Owner name: WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS COLLATE
Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNORS:MAXTOR CORPORATION;SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY LLC;SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL;REEL/FRAME:022757/0017
Effective date: 20090507
Nov 16, 2009FPAYFee payment
Year of fee payment: 4
Jan 19, 2011ASAssignment
Owner name: SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY HDD HOLDINGS, CALIFORNIA
Free format text: RELEASE;ASSIGNOR:JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:025662/0001
Effective date: 20110114
Owner name: MAXTOR CORPORATION, CALIFORNIA
Free format text: RELEASE;ASSIGNOR:JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:025662/0001
Effective date: 20110114
Owner name: SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, CALIFORNIA
Free format text: RELEASE;ASSIGNOR:JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:025662/0001
Effective date: 20110114
Owner name: SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY LLC, CALIFORNIA
Free format text: RELEASE;ASSIGNOR:JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:025662/0001
Effective date: 20110114
Mar 24, 2011ASAssignment
Owner name: THE BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA, AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT,
Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY LLC;REEL/FRAME:026010/0350
Effective date: 20110118
Jul 19, 2013ASAssignment
Owner name: EVAULT INC. (F/K/A I365 INC.), CALIFORNIA
Free format text: TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENT RIGHTS;ASSIGNOR:WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT AND SECOND PRIORITY REPRESENTATIVE;REEL/FRAME:030833/0001
Effective date: 20130312
Owner name: SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY US HOLDINGS, INC., CALIFORNIA
Free format text: TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENT RIGHTS;ASSIGNOR:WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT AND SECOND PRIORITY REPRESENTATIVE;REEL/FRAME:030833/0001
Effective date: 20130312
Owner name: SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY LLC, CALIFORNIA
Free format text: TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENT RIGHTS;ASSIGNOR:WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT AND SECOND PRIORITY REPRESENTATIVE;REEL/FRAME:030833/0001
Effective date: 20130312
Owner name: SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, CAYMAN ISLANDS
Free format text: TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENT RIGHTS;ASSIGNOR:WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT AND SECOND PRIORITY REPRESENTATIVE;REEL/FRAME:030833/0001
Effective date: 20130312
Nov 18, 2013FPAYFee payment
Year of fee payment: 8