|Publication number||US7072141 B2|
|Application number||US 10/680,235|
|Publication date||Jul 4, 2006|
|Filing date||Oct 8, 2003|
|Priority date||Feb 13, 1998|
|Also published as||DE69943403D1, EP0936614A1, EP0936614B1, EP1434221A2, EP1434221A3, US6751050, US7336440, US7643245, US20040070866, US20060164754, US20080106819|
|Publication number||10680235, 680235, US 7072141 B2, US 7072141B2, US-B2-7072141, US7072141 B2, US7072141B2|
|Inventors||Mikio Tokuyama, Hayato Shimizu, Satomitsu Imai, Shozo Saegusa, Masahiko Sega, Toshihisa Okazaki, Yuzo Yamaguchi|
|Original Assignee||Hitachi Global Storage Technologies Japan, Ltd.|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (32), Non-Patent Citations (3), Referenced by (6), Classifications (13), Legal Events (3)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
This is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/247,550, filed Feb. 10, 1999, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,751,050, the subject matter of which is incorporated by reference herein and is copending with U.S. application Ser. No. 10/022,260, filed Dec. 20, 2001, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,665,139, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/247,550, filed Feb. 10, 1999, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,751,050.
The present invention relates to a rotary recording apparatus for reading and writing data from and to a rotating disc by means of a magnetic head, an optical head or the like, and in particular to a magnetic disc unit which can reduce fluid oscillation induced on a rotating disc so as to carry out positioning with a high degree of accuracy.
In a magnetic disc unit, these days, it is required to increase the capacity of memory by increasing the processing speed, and accordingly, the rotational speed of a disc has been gradually increased. However, an increase in the rotational speed, increases disc oscillation due to a fluid force caused by rotation so as to raise a new problem that the degree of positioning accuracy is lowered.
Conventionally, as disclosed in Japanese Laid-Open Patent No. S59-72680, a shroud is provided around the outer periphery of a disc with a predetermined gap between the disc and the shroud in order to reduce bounce (which well be hereinbelow referred to as “flutter”)of the disc. In this document there is described that the distance between the inner wall of the shroud and the outer periphery of the disc is changed from 12 mm to 10 mm, and as a result, the amplitude of oscillation is decreased from about 20f Ê to 10f Ê. Further, if the distance is decreased to 6 mm, the amplitude of oscillation is decreased to 15f Ê, and if the distance is set to be less than 3 mm, the amplitude of oscillation becomes 8 f Ê which is relatively small. That is, if the outer periphery of the magnetic disc and the inner wall of the shroud is set to a value below 3 mm, the oscillation can be minimized.
Further, in Japanese Laid-Open Patent No. H9-204767, there is discloses a gap between a shroud and a magnetic disc which set to be 0.1 mm in order to prevent liquid lubricant with which the outer surface of the magnetic disc is coated, from scattering.
It is noted that, in the above-mentioned Japanese Laid-Open Patent No. S59-72680, there is disclosed a gap between the shroud and the disc which is 2 mm at maximum.
Further, in Japanese Laid-Open Patent No. H9-204767, there is disclosed a gap between the shroud and the disc which is 0.1 mm at maximum.
By the way, in a magnetic disc unit, a higher data transfer velocity (data rate) is desired in order to obtain a larger storage capacity. Thus, the rotational speed of a disc has been gradually increased up to now, and it is anticipated that the rotational speed will be further increased in future. An increase in rotational speed of a disc increases flutter which is oscillation of a disc, and accordingly, would mainly contribute to increase errors in positioning of a magnetic head. Thus, it has been required to reduce the oscillation.
Thus, there has mainly been two ways for reducing flutter of a disc as follows: First, a fluid force serving as an excitation source is reduced. Precisely, the pressure distribution is made to be uniform over the surface of a disc. Second, the stiffness of a disc is increased in order to decrease oscillation of a disc. Although the thickness of a disc may be increased to increase the stiffness of the disc, an increase in the thickness thereof causes a disc unit to have a larger size, and accordingly, it is unpreferable.
An object of the present invention is to provide a rotary recording apparatus which can, on one hand, prevent flutter causing errors in positioning from increasing even though the rotational speed becomes higher, and which can, on the other hand, enhance the degree of positional accuracy for coping with a large storage capacity.
That is, according to the present invention, there is provided a large capacity magnetic disc unit which can reduce a fluid force serving as an excitation source so as to prevent occurrence of flutter in order to restrain occurrence of noise or the like, and which can read and write data from and onto a disc with a high degree of accuracy. Specifically, a shroud (outer wall) is provided around the entire periphery of a rotating disc, except an insertion part thereof for a carriage arm, and a gap between the shroud and the outer periphery of the disc is set to be not less than 0.1 mm but not greater than 0.6 mm.
An air stream induced during rotation of a disc causes a pressure differential between the upper and lower surfaces of the disc, which causes excitation of the disc, resulting in flutter of the disc. If the gap between the shroud and the disc is set to be narrower than a predetermined value, air on the upper and lower surfaces of the disc is isolated so as to reduce the pressure differential.
With this arrangement, it is possible to reduce the amplitude of flutter, and accordingly, the degree of accuracy for positioning a magnetic head even in a high speed recording apparatus can be enhanced.
Explanation will be made of a first embodiment of the present invention with reference to
The shroud 20 is formed therein with an opening 30 for introducing the guide arm 6 therethrough onto a surface of a disc 1. The opening angle of the opening 30 is selected so as to be minimized while to allow the arm to be simply assembled and to prevent the arm from making contact with the shroud even through the head is shifted from the inner periphery to the outer periphery of the disc. In this embodiment, the opening angle is set to about 45 deg.
A wall is formed along the entire periphery of the base 10 of the unit. Further, this wall serves as a part of the shroud 20 surrounding the outer peripheries of the discs 1. However, the shroud 20 is arranged to branch off from the wall in the vicinity of the opening 30 so as to surround the discs 1.
Meanwhile, the wall serves as a surrounding wall 40 for surrounding the carriage 9 so as to hermetically enclose the unit. Repeatedly, the wall surrounding the discs 1 will be hereinbelow defined and referred to as the shroud 20. According to the present invention, the gap between the shroud 20 and the end faces of the discs 1 is regulated within a predetermined range so as to reduce the amplitude of flutter which would occur during rotation of the disc at a high speed, in order to restrain occurrence of noise. Detailed explanation will be hereinbelow made of this measure.
As shown in
In the figure, circular, triangular and square spots denote various flutters having different frequencies. As clearly understood from these results of measurements, the amplitude of flutter is decreased as the disc-shroud gap is decreased to a value less than 0.6 mm. Further, the amplitude of flutter is not appreciably decreased in a range from 0.6 mm to 6 mm. Meanwhile, in the case of less than 0.6 mm, if the disc-shroud gap is decreased to 0.4 mm and to 0.2 mm, the amplitude of flutter can be reduced, remarkably. Specifically, if the shroud gap is 0.2 mm, the amplitude of flutter can be decreased to a value which is about 1/10 of the amplitude of flutter obtained with a disc-shroud gap of 0.6 mm.
In this embodiment, the disc-shroud gap is set to 0.4 mm. With this arrangement, the amplitude of flutter can be reduced to about a half of that obtained at a disc-shroud gap of about 1 mm. Of course, a disc-shroud gap of about 0.5 mm is also effective. It is desirable that the disc-shroud gap is narrower since the amplitude of flutter can become smaller. However, in view of the assembly of a disc unit, the narrower the disc-shroud gap, the more the difficulty in assembling the magnetic disc unit.
Further, it would be practically impossible to set the disc-shroud gap to a value less than 0.1 mm, in view of a diametrical tolerance (±0.05 mm) of discs which are available at present and the erection tolerance between T discs and spindles. In view of the above-mentioned facts, it has been understood that the flutter can be reduced by setting the disc-shroud gap in a range which is not less than 0.1 mm but not greater than 0.6 mm.
As understood from these figures, contour lines have crest peaks on the outer peripheral side of the disc in the case of a disc-shroud gap of 2 mm or 1 mm. These pressure differentials becomes excitation forces applied to the disc, causing the disc to flutter. Meanwhile, in the case of a small disc-shroud gap of 0.5 mm or 0.2 mm, no contour lines having crest peaks of pressure differentials causing occurrence of flutter, are found. In other words, no pressure differentials are produced, and accordingly, the amplitude of flutter becomes smaller. These results well follow the results of experiments shown in
A high speed magnetic disc unit in which the outer diameter of discs is 2.5 inches, and the rotational speed is 12,600 rpm, and the opening 30 has an opening angle of 140 deg. was prepared, and tested for flutter in the following measuring conditions:
topmost and outermost of disc
flutter amplitudes were measured at five low
frequencied by LVD
Averaged values each obtained from the five measured amplitudes were comparatively considered (Refer to
The results of these measurements show that a smaller disc-shroud gap is effective for reducing flutter, similar to the effects mentioned before. In this example, if the disc-shroud gap becomes less than 0.4 mm, the flutter reducing effects is appreciable. Thus, the disc-shroud gap is set to 0.4 mm. Accordingly, the amplitude of flutter can be reduced by about 10%. Further, if the disc-shroud gap is set to 0.2 mm, the flutter can be reduced by about 50%.
In the same example, even if the opening angle of the opening 30 is set to 45 deg., 65 deg. and to 140 deg. respectively, no distinctive difference was appreciated in the effects of reducing the amplitude of flutter by decreasing the disc-shroud gap. Namely, it has been experimentally confirmed that the flutter can be reduced by decreasing the disc-flutter gap if the opening angle was changed from 45 deg. to 140 deg. Thus, the opening angle of the opening 30 is set to about 140 deg. in view of simplicity of the assembly of the apparatus. The lower limit values of the disc-shroud gap must be set to a value greater than 0.1 mm in view of the manufacturing tolerance of outer diameter dimensions of discs and the erection tolerance of the disc unit.
Although difference between -the disc-shroud gaps of 0.6 mm and 0.4 mm for reducing flutter seems to be appreciable, if these gaps are normalized by the diameters of the discs, about 1/150 for a 2.5 inch disc and about 1/130 for a 3.5 inch disc, which are nearly equal to each other, can be obtained. In this example, the flutter can be also reduced while a high speed magnetic disc unit having a large storage capacity can be obtained. Further, with the provision of a pocket adapted to accommodate an air filter for purifying air flowing into the unit, in a part of the shroud, or the provision of a finger insertion pocket for removal of a disc the disc-shroud gap becomes large in that part in comparison with the other part of the shroud. Even in this case, it has been confirmed that effects similar to those mentioned above can be also obtained.
Although, in the first embodiment, it has been explained that the shroud 20 is made of the same casting material as that of the base 10, and is integrally incorporated with the base 10, the shroud 20 may be formed, independent from the base 10, in order to enhance the processing accuracy and the processing performance thereof, and thereafter, it may be assembled to the base 10. Alternatively, the shroud may be machined. Further, even through the disc-shroud gap is different between the uppermost and lowermost ones of the stacked discs due to a die drawing gradient of the base mold dies, it had been confirmed that the same technical effects and advantages as that of the first embodiment may be obtained if the minimum disc-shroud gap is set to a value less than 0.6 mm or 0.4 mm.
With the provision of such an arrangement according to the present invention, a cylindrical shroud is provided around magnetic discs stacked on the shaft of a spindle motor, and a gap between the shroud and the outer end faces of the discs is set in a predetermined range (not less than 0.1 but not greater than 0.6 mm), a high speed and large storage capacity magnetic disc unit can be provided.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US4280155||Jun 4, 1979||Jul 21, 1981||Memorex Mini Disc Drive Corp.||Method of improving air flow in compact disc drive|
|US4583213||Jul 6, 1984||Apr 15, 1986||Storage Technology Partners Ii||Air shroud for data storage disks|
|US4660110||Nov 3, 1983||Apr 21, 1987||Hitachi, Ltd.||Magnetic disk storage device with shroud enclosing disk assembly|
|US5517372||Sep 21, 1993||May 14, 1996||Hitachi, Ltd.||Rotating disk storage device with cooling air flow control|
|US5631787||Jul 19, 1995||May 20, 1997||Quantum Corporation||Power reduction shroud for a hard disk drive|
|US5696649||May 22, 1995||Dec 9, 1997||International Business Machines Corporation||Elastic insert shroud to provide maximum effective shrouding shock mitigation and filtering in high speed disk drives|
|US5757587||Jun 12, 1996||May 26, 1998||International Business Machines Corporation||Direct access storage device having a disk motion limiter for preventing disk data zone and spindle bearing damage|
|US5801899||Jun 6, 1996||Sep 1, 1998||Seagate Technology, Inc.||Mechanical shock protection for a disc drive|
|US5898545||Jul 1, 1997||Apr 27, 1999||International Business Machines Corporation||Head load/unload and disk airflow control apparatus|
|US5907453||Jul 8, 1997||May 25, 1999||Seagate Technology, Inc.||Enhanced convective voice coil cooling to improve the operational performance of a disc drive|
|US5956203||Aug 26, 1997||Sep 21, 1999||International Business Machines Corporation||Disk drive having an insert with a channel for directing air flow to a rotary actuator voicecoil|
|US6125003||Oct 29, 1998||Sep 26, 2000||International Business Machines Corporation||Disk drive having pivotally mounted shroud|
|US6172843 *||Jul 13, 1998||Jan 9, 2001||Seagate Technology Llc||Shroud mounted disc snubber|
|US6236532 *||Sep 26, 1997||May 22, 2001||Nec Corporation||Magnetic disk drive having small clearance between magnetic disk and surface opposing thereto|
|US6271987 *||Nov 21, 1997||Aug 7, 2001||Seagate Technology Llc||Circumferentially extending disc snubber|
|US6369978 *||Jul 16, 1999||Apr 9, 2002||Hitachi, Ltd.||Magnetic disk apparatus with shroud having opening downstream of moveable arm|
|US6462901 *||Feb 22, 2000||Oct 8, 2002||Seagate Technology Llc||Ribbed shrouding spacer and method for reducing flutter and windage losses in disc drives|
|US6665139 *||Dec 20, 2001||Dec 16, 2003||Hitachi, Ltd.||Magnetic-disc unit with gap between disc and shroud|
|US6751050 *||Feb 10, 1999||Jun 15, 2004||Hitachi, Ltd.||Magnetic disc unit|
|EP0657889A1||Nov 28, 1994||Jun 14, 1995||Teac Corporation||Hard disk drive with reduced power consumption|
|EP0936614A1 *||Feb 12, 1999||Aug 18, 1999||Hitachi, Ltd.||Magnetic disc unit|
|EP1256939A2 *||May 10, 2002||Nov 13, 2002||Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.||Apparatus and method for dampening disk vibration in storage devices|
|GB1409099A||Title not available|
|JPH03150778A||Title not available|
|JPH05234327A *||Title not available|
|JPH07320478A||Title not available|
|JPH08111017A *||Title not available|
|JPH09204767A||Title not available|
|JPH11144439A||Title not available|
|JPS5972680A||Title not available|
|JPS5984386A||Title not available|
|JPS54154310A||Title not available|
|1||"Shrouded Flexible-Disk Pack", F. E. Talke, IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, vol. 19, No. 5, Oct. 1976.|
|2||Aerodynamic Aspects of Disk Files, Lennemann, Nov. 1974, pp. 480-488.|
|3||Multiple Accessing for Flexible Disk File Stacks, A. H. Bell et al, IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, vol. 22, No. 7, Dec. 1979.|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US7336440 *||Mar 24, 2006||Feb 26, 2008||Hitachi Global Storage Technologies Japan, Ltd.||Magnetic disc unit with gap between magnetic disc and shroud|
|US7525759 *||Sep 9, 2005||Apr 28, 2009||Hitachi Global Storage Technologies Netherlands B.V.||Magnetic disk device with improved shielding|
|US7643245||Dec 21, 2007||Jan 5, 2010||Hitachi Global Storage Technologies Japan, Ltd.||Magnetic disc unit with gap between magnetic disc and shroud|
|US20060056104 *||Sep 9, 2005||Mar 16, 2006||Hitachi Global Storage Technologies Netherlands B.V.||Magnetic disk device with improved shielding|
|US20060164754 *||Mar 24, 2006||Jul 27, 2006||Mikio Tokuyama||Magnetic disc unit|
|US20080106819 *||Dec 21, 2007||May 8, 2008||Mikio Tokuyama||Magnetic disc unit with gap between magnetic disc and shroud|
|U.S. Classification||360/97.14, G9B/33.024, G9B/25.003|
|International Classification||G11B33/12, G11B33/14, G11B33/08, G11B25/04|
|Cooperative Classification||G11B33/08, G11B25/043, G11B33/148|
|European Classification||G11B33/14D, G11B33/08, G11B25/04R|
|Mar 14, 2006||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: HITACHI GLOBAL STORAGE TECHNOLOGIES JAPAN, LTD., J
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:HITACHI, LTD.;REEL/FRAME:017336/0194
Effective date: 20060222
|Dec 21, 2009||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|Dec 4, 2013||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 8