|Publication number||US7077889 B2|
|Application number||US 10/408,058|
|Publication date||Jul 18, 2006|
|Filing date||Apr 4, 2003|
|Priority date||Apr 4, 2003|
|Also published as||US20040194626|
|Publication number||10408058, 408058, US 7077889 B2, US 7077889B2, US-B2-7077889, US7077889 B2, US7077889B2|
|Inventors||Anand Chellappa, Charles Call, Michael Powell|
|Original Assignee||Intelligent Engery, Inc.|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (20), Non-Patent Citations (1), Referenced by (4), Classifications (31), Legal Events (4)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates generally to the surface modification of substrates, and in particular, to a the surface modification of porous metal substrates, to receive a membrane, using an ion beam.
2. Description of Related Art
The growing popularity of portable electronic devices has produced an increased demand for compact and correspondingly portable electrical power sources to energize these devices. Developments in robotics and other emerging technology applications are further increasing the demand for small, independent power sources. At present, storage or rechargeable batteries are typically used to provide independent electrical power sources for portable devices. However, the amount of energy that can be stored in storage or rechargeable batteries is insufficient to meet the need of certain applications.
Hydrogen/air fuel cells (H/AFCs) have enormous potential as a replacement for batteries. Because they can operate on very energy-dense fuels, fuel cell-based power supplies offer high energy-to-weight ratios compared with even state-of-the-art batteries. Fuel cells are of particular interest to the military, where significant efforts are being made to reduce the weight of power supplies that soldiers must carry to support high-tech, field-portable equipment. There is also considerable potential for utilizing fuel cell-based power supplies for commercial applications, particularly for portable application where small size and low weight are desirable.
A common H/AFC is a polymer electrolyte membrane (PEM) fuel cell. PEM fuel cells are constructed of an anode and a cathode separated by a polymer electrolyte membrane. Functionally, fuel cells generate electricity by reacting hydrogen with oxygen to produce water. Since oxygen can typically be obtained from the ambient atmosphere, only a source of hydrogen must be provided to operate a fuel cell. Merely providing compressed hydrogen is not always a viable option, because of the substantial volume that even a highly compressed gas occupies. Liquid hydrogen, which occupies less volume, is a cryogenic liquid, and a significant amount of energy is required to achieve the extremely low temperatures required to liquefy gaseous hydrogen. Furthermore, there are safety issues involved with the handling and storage of hydrogen in the compressed gas form or in the liquid form.
One method of producing hydrogen is by processing hydrocarbons such as methane (natural gas), propane, butane, and liquid fuels such as gasoline, diesel and JP-8 or oxygenates such as methanol. The choice of fuel and the choice of the method of processing, such as steam reforming, partial oxidation, and autothermal reforming, depends to a large extent on the type of service, such as, portable, stationary or automotive. Hydrogen can also be produced by cracking ammonia. The product stream from the fuel processor, when a hydrocarbon fuel is used, contains hydrogen in addition to unreacted hydrocarbons, other products such as CO, CO2, and diluents such as nitrogen. In essence, the hydrogen concentration in the product stream can be in the 40 to 75 volumetric percent range depending on the type of fuel and the method of processing. Methods such as water gas shift and preferential oxidation are used to reduce the CO concentrations to acceptable levels of no more than 50 parts per million, but increase the complexity of the system.
One method of separating the hydrogen from the product stream concerns the use of hydrogen separation membranes. These membranes are in general composed of pure palladium or alloys of palladium and can either be supported or unsupported. Supports are usually porous ceramics with porosity in the 40 to 60 percent range. Commercial hydrogen separation membranes are unsupported and are tubular in nature. The separation membranes are composed of one tube or more than one tube that are bundled together and are designed to supply high purity hydrogen, that is, hydrogen which is greater than 99.9 percent pure. The separation membranes are generally limited to operating temperatures below 450° C. due to the sealing techniques used, which is inherent to tubular configurations, and are generally costly. To reduce costs, considerable efforts have been focused on supporting thin membrane layers on porous ceramic support, with porosity in the 40 to 60 percent range. The problem with porous ceramic supports is that the adherence of a metallic membrane to a nonmetallic ceramic substrate is a major problem, particularly when the supported membrane is exposed to thermal cycling between room temperature and elevated temperatures of no less than 400° C. In this case too, the ceramic supports that are evaluated are in the form of tubes, to mimic the construction and service of unsupported commercial membrane modules.
The hydrogen separation membrane, preferably made of pure palladium or palladium alloys, is deposited on the porous substrate by techniques such as electroless plating and electroplating. The substrate is exposed to the precursor metal salts of predetermined compositions in a deliberate fashion, and the salts are subsequently decomposed to yield a metal film or membrane on the support. Achieving a uniform pin-hole or crack free membrane is reportedly influenced by the surface morphology and pore size distribution of the ceramic support. In particular, a smooth substrate surface having small pores of no more than 1 micron in diameter and uniform pore size distribution are believed to be desirable. Small pores prevent wicking or seepage of the salt precursors through the pores. A smooth surface favors a uniform membrane deposition, however some level of roughness is needed to provide adhesion. The fact that these properties are possessed by ceramic substrates make them particularly attractive for experimentation and development efforts.
Relatively less focus and efforts have been directed towards the use of porous metal substrates. This is mainly because the porous sintered are relatively less porous than the ceramic substrates when compared at similar pore diameters, and therefore allows less gas flow for a defined pressure drop across a given substrate. For example, a porous stainless steel substrate rated as 0.2 micron grade (Mott, which means that the porous material can retain particles of average particle size 0.2 microns from a fluid stream) has a porosity of only about 7%, and that rated as 1 micron grade (Mott) has a porosity of about 30%. The synthesis and sintering process during the manufacture of the metal substrates does not allow for pore size and porosity to be varied independent of one another. In addition, the surface of metal substrates is relatively rough. Typically, techniques used to smoothen the surface, such as shot peening, results in pore closure and consequently decreases porosity and cause ‘pitting’ of the surface which can increase surface roughness.
In spite of the above negative characteristics, porous metal substrate based membranes represent a desirable feature for integration with a fuel processor for PEM cell applications. They have higher thermal conductivities than ceramics and therefore result in high heat transfer rates. They can be sealed in a relatively straightforward fashion using welding to components such as reactors, unlike ceramic substrates that need grafoil or soft metal gaskets. Inherently, the metal to metal adhesion of the membrane to the substrate can be expected to be better than that expected using metal-ceramic substrates.
Accordingly, it would be desirous to develop a method for preparing a porous metal substrate to support a separation membrane wherein the cost and complexity of manufacturing the membrane may be significantly reduced.
According to one aspect of the present invention, a method for preparing a metal or metallic substrate surface to receive a membrane.
According to another aspect of the present invention, a method for controlling the pore size in the surface region of a metal or metallic substrate without substantially reducing bulk porosity.
According to another aspect of the present invention, a method for preparing a porous metal for membrane deposition. The method includes exposing a metal substrate to an ion beam, wherein the metal substrate has a principal surface and a variance, and wherein the variance is reduced, without substantially reducing bulk porosity, upon exposing the metal substrate to the ion beam.
According to another aspect of the present invention, a device for separating hydrogen from a hydrocarbon fuel processor is provided. The device includes a metal substrate, wherein a surface of the metal substrate has been previously exposed to an ion beam and a hydrogen separation membrane supported thereon.
Other features and advantages of the present invention will be set forth, in part, in the descriptions which follow and the accompanying drawings, wherein the preferred embodiments of the present invention are described and shown, and in part, will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon examination of the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings or may be learned by practice of the present invention. The advantages of the present invention may be realized and attained by means of the instrumentalities and combinations particularly pointed out in the appendent claims.
It should be appreciated that for simplicity and clarity of illustration, elements shown in the Figures have not necessarily been drawn to scale. For example, the dimensions of some of the elements are exaggerated relative to each other for clarity. Further, where considered appropriate, reference numerals have been repeated among the Figures to indicate corresponding elements.
The present invention discloses forming a separation membrane, such as a hydrogen separation membrane, for separating a product, such a hydrogen, from a mixed product stream including hydrogen, CO, CO2 and hydrocarbons. The separation membrane includes a membrane on a porous metal substrate. To prepare the metal substrate for bonding to the membrane, a surface of the porous metal substrate is modified by exposing the porous metal substrate to an ion beam. Since surface modification of the metal substrate using ion beams extends to only a few microns in depth into the metal substrate, the surface roughness of the porous metal substrate is decreased without affecting the remainder of the metal substrate bulk porosity of the metal substrate. In some instance the surface pore diameter may be reduced also without affecting the remainder of the metal substrate bulk porosity of the metal substrate.
The bulk porosity of the metal substrate 30 can be described by a Darcy value (For example, a value of 1.0 represents a flow of 1 cc of 1 cP (viscosity) fluid in 1 second at 1 atmosphere pressure through a 1 cm2×1 cm thick section of porous media.). The range of Darcy value for metal substrates which may be suitable for surface modification is between 0.1 and 100.
Preferably the bulk porosity of the metal substrate 30, before and after exposure to the ion beam is between about 7% and about 60%, more perfectly the bulk porosity is greater than about 30% which corresponds to a Darcy value of about 0.22.
The principal surface 40 of the metal substrate 30 consists of a series of peaks and valleys. The variance V of the metal substrate 30 is a measure of the surface roughness determined by the measuring the distance between the tallest peak and lowest valley in the principal surface 40. The initial variance V1 of the metal substrate 30 is defined herein as the distance between the tallest initial peak 36 and the lowest initial valley 38. Preferably, the initial variance V1 of the metal substrate 30 is between 1 and 50 microns.
In order to reduce the variance V which will increase uniformity and/or smoothness in the principal surface 40, the principal surface 40 is modified by exposing the principal surface 40 to ion beams 44, as illustrated in FIG. 3. For example, the metal substrate 30 may be placed in a pulsed ion beam chamber, and subjected to Ion Beam Surface Treatment. QM Technologies in Albuquerque, N.Mex. provides such Ion Beam Surface Treatment. Once inside the ion beam chamber, ion beams 44 are generated and directed at the principal surface 40 of the metal substrate 30. The energy and duration of the ion beams may be modified depending on the desired results. For example, in order to reduce the variance (surface roughness) of a metal substrate 30. Preferably to an average variance of less than about 10 microns, more preferably to an average variance of less than about 5 microns and most preferably to a variance of about 1 microns.
To reduce the average variance the metal substrate 30 is be exposed to ion beams 44 having an energy of between 1 to 10 J/cm2 for a duration of 100 to 150 nano-seconds per pulse; the treatment comprising between 1 and 10 pulses. The optimal energy and duration of the output will vary with the composite of the metal substrate and/or its initial porosity.
Once exposed to the ion beams, the variance V is reduced from the initial variance V1 to a reduced variance V2. The reduced variance V2 of the metal substrate 30 is defined herein as the distance between the tallest reduced peak 46 and the lowest reduced valley 48, as illustrated in FIG. 4A. Preferably, the initial variance V1 is reduced by about fifty percent upon exposing the metal substrate 30 to the ion beam 44. Preferably, the reduced variance V2 of the metal substrate 30 is between 1 and 5 microns.
Because the ion beam only extends a few microns into the surface region 41 into the metal substrate 30, wherein it heats up and melts the surface region 41, exposure of the metal substrate 30 to an ion beam 44, can reduce the initial variance V1 or surface roughness of the principal surface 40 without substantially altering the bulk porosity of the metal substrate 30. As shown in
The above described exposure to the ion beam does not substantially reduce the bulk porosity of the metal substrate 30. However, in some case the exposure to ion beams can also reduce the average surface pore size DC in the surface region 41 while the average pore diameter DB in the body region 43 is substantially unaltered. Thus maintaining the bulk porosity. As shown in
A membrane 50 formed of pure palladium or palladium alloys, is useful to separate hydrogen gas, from a mixed product stream. Such a palladium or palladium alloy membrane is commonly deposited by techniques that include, but not limited to electroless plating and electroplating. During electroless plating, the substrate is exposed to the precursor metal salts of predetermined compositions in a deliberate fashion, and the salts are subsequently decomposed to yield a metal film or membrane on the metal substrate 30. Small pore size in the surface region 41 favors uniform membrane 50 deposition. Small pores prevent winking or seepage of the salt precursors through the pores.
Preferably, a palladium or alloys of palladium the membrane 50 has a thickness of between 1 and 10 microns. In general, the forming of a thinner membrane saves costs and materials. From a process standpoint, a thinner membrane is preferred as the hydrogen flux (flow rate per unit are) through the membrane is inversely proportional to membrane thickness. Additionally, if the membrane is applied in excess of about 20 microns it can lead to process inefficiencies and higher costs, particularly when the hydrogen separation device is part of the fuel processor for producing hydrogen.
If the membrane deposited on the ion beam treated surface is found to contain some minor holes or defects, additional ion beam treatments can be used to minimize such defects by melting membrane into these defects as a finishing step.
Although the invention has been described and illustrated with reference to specific illustrative embodiments thereof, it is not intended that the invention be limited to those illustrative embodiments. Those skilled in the art will recognize that variations and modifications can be made without departing from the spirit of the invention.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US2958391 *||Apr 10, 1958||Nov 1, 1960||Universal Oil Prod Co||Purification of hydrogen utilizing hydrogen-permeable membranes|
|US3428476 *||Jun 22, 1965||Feb 18, 1969||Engelhard Min & Chem||Method for producing hydrogen diffusion cells|
|US4526839||Mar 1, 1984||Jul 2, 1985||Surface Science Corp.||Process for thermally spraying porous metal coatings on substrates|
|US5302414||May 19, 1990||Apr 12, 1994||Anatoly Nikiforovich Papyrin||Gas-dynamic spraying method for applying a coating|
|US5316802 *||Jun 4, 1992||May 31, 1994||Nissin Electric Co., Ltd.||Method of forming copper film on substrate|
|US5498278 *||Dec 19, 1994||Mar 12, 1996||Bend Research, Inc.||Composite hydrogen separation element and module|
|US5738708 *||Jun 7, 1995||Apr 14, 1998||The Regents Of The University Of California Office Of Technology Transfer||Composite metal membrane|
|US6077621 *||Jan 6, 1998||Jun 20, 2000||De Nora S.P.A.||Method of forming robust metal, metal oxide, and metal alloy layers on ion-conductive polymer membranes|
|US6152987 *||Aug 24, 1998||Nov 28, 2000||Worcester Polytechnic Institute||Hydrogen gas-extraction module and method of fabrication|
|US6315820 *||Oct 19, 1999||Nov 13, 2001||Ford Global Technologies, Inc.||Method of manufacturing thin metal alloy foils|
|US6319566 *||May 19, 2000||Nov 20, 2001||John C. Polanyi||Method of molecular-scale pattern imprinting at surfaces|
|US6368664 *||Nov 2, 2000||Apr 9, 2002||Guardian Industries Corp.||Method of ion beam milling substrate prior to depositing diamond like carbon layer thereon|
|US6408928||Sep 8, 2000||Jun 25, 2002||Linde Gas Aktiengesellschaft||Production of foamable metal compacts and metal foams|
|US6730364 *||Mar 28, 2002||May 4, 2004||National Science Council||Preparation of carbon molecular sieve membranes on porous substrate|
|US6743369 *||Dec 17, 2001||Jun 1, 2004||Sanyo Electric Co., Ltd.||Method for manufacturing electrode for secondary battery|
|US20010051231 *||May 1, 1997||Dec 13, 2001||Barry C. Muffoletto||Method for improving electrical conductivity of metals, metal alloys and metal oxides|
|US20010055694||Apr 8, 1999||Dec 27, 2001||Masahiro Wada||High strength spongy sintered metal composite sheet and production method thereof|
|US20020062738 *||Nov 20, 2001||May 30, 2002||Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd.||Substance separation structure and method of preparing the same|
|US20020078827 *||Dec 22, 2000||Jun 27, 2002||Thornton Peter Howard||Supported membrane for hydrogen separation|
|US20030044519 *||Jun 14, 2002||Mar 6, 2003||Hyperion Catalysis International, Inc.||Field emission devices using ion bombarded carbon nanotubes|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US7560170 *||Apr 4, 2003||Jul 14, 2009||Intelligent Energy, Inc.||Surface modification of porous metal substrates using cold spray|
|US8075958 *||Jul 29, 2004||Dec 13, 2011||Intelligent Energy, Inc.||Methods for providing thin hydrogen separation membranes and associated uses|
|US20040197593 *||Apr 4, 2003||Oct 7, 2004||Anand Chellappa||Surface modification of porous metal substrates using cold spray|
|US20070180991 *||Jul 29, 2004||Aug 9, 2007||Anand Chellappa||Methods for providing thin hydrogen seperation membranes and associated uses|
|U.S. Classification||96/11, 55/DIG.5, 427/553, 427/534, 427/551, 55/524, 95/56|
|International Classification||B01D69/10, B01D71/02, C01B3/50, B01D53/22, B01D67/00|
|Cooperative Classification||Y10T428/12479, Y10S55/05, C01B2203/0405, B01D67/009, B01D2325/04, B01D53/228, C01B2203/047, B01D71/022, C01B2203/048, C01B3/503, B01D67/0069, B01D69/10, C01B2203/0475|
|European Classification||B01D67/00M22, B01D69/10, B01D71/02M, B01D53/22M, C01B3/50B2, B01D67/00R16|
|Apr 4, 2003||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: MESOFUEL, INC., NEW MEXICO
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:CHELLAPPA, ANAND;CALL, CHARLES;POWELL, MICHAEL;REEL/FRAME:013941/0466;SIGNING DATES FROM 20030401 TO 20030403
|Oct 24, 2005||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: INTELLIGENT ENERGY, INC., CALIFORNIA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:MESOFUEL, INC.;REEL/FRAME:016931/0356
Effective date: 20050616
|Jan 19, 2010||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|Jan 20, 2014||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 8