|Publication number||US7096619 B2|
|Application number||US 10/780,058|
|Publication date||Aug 29, 2006|
|Filing date||Feb 17, 2004|
|Priority date||Feb 17, 2004|
|Also published as||US20050188583, WO2005079288A2, WO2005079288A3|
|Publication number||10780058, 780058, US 7096619 B2, US 7096619B2, US-B2-7096619, US7096619 B2, US7096619B2|
|Inventors||Charles L. Jackson, Christopher S. Weaver|
|Original Assignee||Jackson Charles L, Weaver Christopher S|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (38), Non-Patent Citations (6), Referenced by (11), Classifications (10), Legal Events (4)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
The invention is a means for securing a piece of hand-held equipment so that it is easily activated by an authorized user while, at the same time, individuals without proper authorization cannot easily active the equipment. The prototypical equipment to which the invention applies is a pistol or revolver. However the invention can also be applied to a wide range of human-operated equipment such as automobiles, airplanes, cell phones, PDAs, and snowmobiles.
Firearm safety has been an issue almost as long as firearms have existed. In the last several years there has been interest in developing systems that permit only authorized users to operate firearms. Designs for such systems have included (1) special rings that, when in close proximity to the firearm, permit operation of the firearm, and (2) systems that scan the fingerprint or other biomechanical marker and permit authorized users, whose physical characteristics have been pre-entered into the authorization system, to use the firearm. Examples of proposed designs having a ring or other transmitter in the vicinity of the firearm include U.S. Pat. No. 4,488,370 to Lemelson, U.S. Pat. No. 5,461,812 to Bennett, or published U.S. patent application No. 20030097776. Another example is U.S. Pat. No. 5,062,232 to Eppler, which proposes a glove to be worn by the user. An example of a biometric type of system would be published U.S. Patent Application No. 20030098774. Each of these patents and patent applications are hereby incorporated by reference.
Similarly, a variety mechanisms, notably key and lock systems, are used to authorize operation of automobiles, airplanes, electrical generators, etc.
Although some of these prior mechanisms may have provided some measure of security or safety, they are inconvenient and suffer from serious drawbacks in their operation.
The present invention provides a new and different security mechanism that can be personalized by one or more authorized users without the inconvenience of requiring separate equipment such as a transmitter ring or key.
A system for authorizing use of equipment comprising a motion sensor for sensing a movement of the equipment, a processor connected to an output of the motion sensor for analyzing a movement of the equipment, an energy source connected to the motion sensor and the processor, and an operation enablement subsystem connected to the processor for enabling operation of the equipment in response to a signal from the processor.
The system may be adapted, for example, for use on a firearm. In such an example, the motion sensor may be located on the barrel of the firearm but may be located elsewhere. The processor may be located in the handle of the firearm, but, like the motion sensor, may be located elsewhere. The motion sensor may be, for example, one or more accelerometers.
Aspects, features, and attendant advantages of the present invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from a reading of the following detailed description of embodiments constructed in accordance therewith, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
The invention of the present application will now be described in more detail with reference to preferred embodiments of the architecture and method, given only by way of example, and with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
The present invention may apply to any type of hand-held equipment that may be moved in prescribed patterns by an operator prior to use. For purposes of clarity of description, however, the preferred embodiments will be described in the context of hand-held firearms such as a pistol or revolver 200. The use of electronics to control such firearms has been disclosed, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 6,430.861, which is hereby incorporated by reference. Those of skill in the art should understand that the invention is equally applicable to other types of devices such as cell phones, radios, or PDA's.
In a preferred embodiment of the invention, a motion sensing device, such as an accelerometer, is embedded in a firearm. The motion sensing device may be placed on, attached to, or incorporated into any portion of the firearm, although placement of the motion-sensing device on the barrel of the firearm is preferred in this example. A processor in the firearm senses a pattern or patterns of motion of the firearm, and on sensing a specified sequence of motions, the processor permits operation of the firearm. The processor, could be placed in the same vicinity of the firearm as the accelerometer or could be placed, for example, in the handle 210 of the device.
The operator would move the firearm in a prescribed fashion to “unlock the gun.” For example, the operator might trace out his or her initials with the muzzle of a pistol. Unlocking would stay valid until some prescribed event, such as the operator releasing the gun handle, squeezing extra hard on the handle, or performing a second specified sequence of motions. The unlocking effect likewise could remain valid for some prescribed period of time.
Alternatively, the prescribed pattern motions might be a series of elementary motions (sharp right, sharp right, forward). Choosing only simple motions in each of the three directions (up/down, left/right, forward/back) and the use of only three motions in an unlocking combination yields 63=216 combinations. While a combination lock with only 216 combinations would not provide useful security, a set of 216 combinations would pose a substantial impediment to some who seized a firearm from a police officer and wished to use the firearm immediately to injure or to threaten others.
Alternatively, a more complex set of steps could be used for authorization—pauses, intensity of motion, combinations of motions (e.g., down and left), and duration of motion could also be included. Staying with the six basic directions but permitting the additional complexity of brief and long pauses, fast and slow motions, and brief and longer motions gives 26 basic motions (e.g., left-fast-short, right-slow-long). There are about 17,000 combinations of three such movements and about one-half million combinations of four such movements. Clearly, this invention permits a wide tradeoff between the complexity of the authorizing motions and the possibility that an unauthorized user could activate the device.
In a preferred embodiment as shown in
Alternatively, instead of the 3-axis accelerometer, there could be a 2-axis accelerometer or a 1-axis accelerometer or a combination of multiple accelerometers. Moreover, a true accelerometer could be replaced with a simplified on-off accelerometer—a system capable of detecting when acceleration in a specified direction exceeded a given level. (This could be a weight+spring+switch subsystem).
The output of the accelerometer or accelerometers would be fed into the processor or microcomputer 120. The processor would match the sequence of motions indicated with the pre-stored authorization sequence or sequences. On sensing an authorizing sequence, the processor would permit operation of the firearm. For example, the processor could energize a solenoid that would interpose a linking bar between the hammer and the firing pin.
Alternatively, the firearm could use an electrical ignition system—sending an electrical current through the primer in the cartridge. In this alternative, a digital input from the trigger mechanism would flow to the processor, signaling the processor whenever the trigger was pulled. On sensing a trigger pull, the processor would then check the authorization state of the firearm, and when properly authorized transmit the ignition current.
A second sensor may be attached to the firearm to detect when the firearm is in an operator's hand and ready to be activated. This sensor would send a signal to the processor indicating that the firearm was being held by a potential operator. Alternatively, this sensor could be used to energize the processor—the sensor could be as simple as an on-off switch that was activated when the user wrapped his or her hands around the handle of a pistol.
The processor would not permit the firearm to be discharged if the user released his or her grip on the firearm for a period of time sufficiently long for the firearm to be transferred to the grip of a second person. The processor might be programmed to tolerate grip releases as long as 50 milliseconds but to require reactivation of the firearm if the user's grip were released for longer than 50 milliseconds. Alternatively, in order to permit a wide range of handling options, the processor might be programmed to require reactivation only if the user's grip were released for longer than 5 seconds.
The pattern or patterns of movement necessary to activate the firearm could be set in a variety of ways. The system could allow for an authorized user to program a particular movement or pattern of movement to activate the firearm. For example, the firearm could include a PROGRAM mode in which a user could move the weapon in a chosen pattern and the system would start the particular movement or pattern of movements in a memory. In this way, a simple firearm could be program to operate in response to a plurality of patterns such that more than one user, such a police officer and his or her partner, could be authorized users of a single weapon.
The system could be placed into PROGRAM mode in a secure manner, such as through a connection, wired or wireless, to a processor that uses an encryption key to place the system into the desired mode.
The system could include a sleep mode in which the processor and all associated electronics were turned off for a period of 90 milliseconds. A timer, using minimal stored electricity, would activate the processor for a period of 1 millisecond. The processor would examine the outputs of the accelerometers, and if it found that the firearm was in an operator's hand and in the initial motion of an authorizing sequence, would send a signal that would activate the power for a longer period of time. Alternatively, if the processor did not sense such motion, it would return to the sleep mode. Such a sleep mode would permit the system to be effectively available at all times while consuming battery energy at a reduced rate—thus permitting long battery life.
In another embodiment, the power to the system could be turned off when a mechanical safety 220 on the firearm is engaged and turned on only when the mechanical safety on the firearm is disengaged.
The system could be designed to go into either an operational state after a battery ran down or to become inoperational after a battery ran down. The choice between the two alternatives depends on the relative costs of denying operation to authorized users and permitting use by unauthorized users. The system additionally could include an indicator 230 that depicts the battery level, or an indicator tat is activated only when the battery level goes below a certain threshold. The system likewise could include the ability to recharge the battery or batteries at a convenient time or location for the user.
The firearm might have one or more indicators to show that the firearm has accepted an authorization and/or that the battery is properly charged.
Although the invention has been defined in terms of the authorization of the use of a firearm, the invention can also be applied to the authorization of the use of handheld electronics devices such as personal processors, wireless phones, and PDAs, or handheld tools such as a nail gun.
While the foregoing invention has been described in terms of its preferred embodiments, it should be understood that various modifications may be made thereto without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined in the appended claims. It is intended that all such modifications fall within the scope of the appended claims.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US4488370||Feb 26, 1982||Dec 18, 1984||Lemelson Jerome H||Weapon control system and method|
|US4839838||Mar 30, 1987||Jun 13, 1989||Labiche Mitchell||Spatial input apparatus|
|US5062232||Feb 23, 1990||Nov 5, 1991||Eppler Larry D||Safety device for firearms|
|US5440326||Jan 5, 1993||Aug 8, 1995||Gyration, Inc.||Gyroscopic pointer|
|US5453758||Jul 29, 1993||Sep 26, 1995||Sony Corporation||Input apparatus|
|US5461812||Nov 16, 1994||Oct 31, 1995||Bennett; Emeric S.||Method and apparatus for a weapon firing safety system|
|US5515032 *||Feb 8, 1995||May 7, 1996||Ici Americas Inc.||Alarm device|
|US5758524||Mar 22, 1996||Jun 2, 1998||Yu; Sandy Tai Sheung||Handle-mounted locking apparatus and method|
|US5875108||Jun 6, 1995||Feb 23, 1999||Hoffberg; Steven M.||Ergonomic man-machine interface incorporating adaptive pattern recognition based control system|
|US5892421||Jan 15, 1997||Apr 6, 1999||Denso Corporation||Starter activatable at low and high speeds sequentially|
|US5898421||May 7, 1996||Apr 27, 1999||Gyration, Inc.||Gyroscopic pointer and method|
|US6081750||Jun 6, 1995||Jun 27, 2000||Hoffberg; Steven Mark||Ergonomic man-machine interface incorporating adaptive pattern recognition based control system|
|US6230946||Feb 23, 2000||May 15, 2001||Albert W. Vor Keller||Safety holster for preventing access to a firearm by unauthorized users|
|US6314671||Mar 6, 2000||Nov 13, 2001||Fn Herstal, S.A.||Fire arm equipped with an enabling system|
|US6321478||Dec 4, 1998||Nov 27, 2001||Smith & Wesson Corp.||Firearm having an intelligent controller|
|US6408905||Dec 8, 2000||Jun 25, 2002||Frederick A. Lee||Electric motor-driven semi-automatic handgun requiring micro-processor code for operation|
|US6412207||Mar 9, 1999||Jul 2, 2002||Caleb Clark Crye||Firearm safety and control system|
|US6415542||Apr 19, 2000||Jul 9, 2002||International Business Machines Corporation||Location-based firearm discharge prevention|
|US6418424||May 4, 1999||Jul 9, 2002||Steven M. Hoffberg||Ergonomic man-machine interface incorporating adaptive pattern recognition based control system|
|US6429769||Sep 20, 2000||Aug 6, 2002||Leonardo Fulgueira||Security system for firearms and method|
|US6430861||May 29, 2001||Aug 13, 2002||Tyler Ayers||Electronically controlled firearm|
|US6442880||Jul 16, 1999||Sep 3, 2002||Robert M. Allan||Firearm with locking and unlocking apparatus|
|US6481138||Aug 18, 2000||Nov 19, 2002||Albert Roca||Magnetic trigger safety|
|US6481140||Nov 28, 2000||Nov 19, 2002||William Marshall||Firearm safety system with implanted computer chip|
|US6494368||Feb 4, 2002||Dec 17, 2002||Franco Sapia||Electronic trigger lock apparatus and system|
|US6499243||Mar 1, 2002||Dec 31, 2002||Spid 2002 Corp.||Firearm safety system|
|US6510639||Jan 5, 2001||Jan 28, 2003||Mcmoore William A.||Firearm safety lock|
|US6533149||Jul 11, 2001||Mar 18, 2003||Al Vor Keller||Safety holster for preventing access to a firearm by unauthorized users|
|US6563940 *||May 16, 2001||May 13, 2003||New Jersey Institute Of Technology||Unauthorized user prevention device and method|
|US6578308||Mar 29, 2001||Jun 17, 2003||Frederick R. Hickerson||Firearm safety device|
|US6580876||Mar 13, 2002||Jun 17, 2003||Terry Gordon||Photographic firearm apparatus and method|
|US6588635||Apr 4, 2001||Jul 8, 2003||Safety First Devices, Inc.||Safety holster for preventing access to a firearm by unauthorized users|
|US6711844 *||May 15, 2002||Mar 30, 2004||Albert Eugene Rumfelt||Firearm locking system and method for preventing rotation of a cylinder|
|US6775940 *||Feb 14, 2003||Aug 17, 2004||S/R Industries, Inc.||Motion detecting safety device|
|US20010047488 *||Jan 31, 2001||Nov 29, 2001||Christopher Verplaetse||Motion password control system|
|US20020174588 *||May 22, 2002||Nov 28, 2002||R.A. Brands, Llc||Firearm orientation and drop sensor system|
|US20030097776||Apr 12, 2001||May 29, 2003||Joergen Brosow||Electronic security device for a firearm and associated electronically coded ammunition|
|US20030098774||Mar 21, 2001||May 29, 2003||Chornenky Todd E.||Security apparatus|
|1||"Colt's Smart Gun," by Bill Clede, Law and Order, Feb. 1997; 4 pages.|
|2||"False Hope fo the Smart Gun," Violence Policy Center, 1998; 5 pages.|
|3||"Justice Dept. reaches for 'smart' gun," by Sandeep Junnarkar, CNET News.com, Oct. 22, 2002 ; 2 pages.|
|4||"Meet the 'gun with brains,'" by Stuart Johnston, Popular Mechanics, Mar. 2003; 3 pages.|
|5||"'Smart Gun' May Be A Much Safer One," by David Lazarus, San Francisco Chronicle, Feb. 21, 2000; 3 pages.|
|6||"The World's First Totally Electronic Handgun," Metal Storm Limited, 2003; 2 pages.|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US7698846 *||Sep 2, 2004||Apr 20, 2010||Do Amarante Jose Carlos Albano||Owner recognition by portable guns|
|US7714720 *||Jun 6, 2006||May 11, 2010||Savox Communications Oy Ab (Ltd)||Alarm system and alarm device|
|US7917768||Jan 23, 2007||Mar 29, 2011||Dp Technologies, Inc.||System control via characteristic gait signature|
|US8285344||May 20, 2009||Oct 9, 2012||DP Technlogies, Inc.||Method and apparatus for adjusting audio for a user environment|
|US8320578||Apr 30, 2008||Nov 27, 2012||Dp Technologies, Inc.||Headset|
|US8555282||Jul 27, 2007||Oct 8, 2013||Dp Technologies, Inc.||Optimizing preemptive operating system with motion sensing|
|US8620353||Jan 26, 2007||Dec 31, 2013||Dp Technologies, Inc.||Automatic sharing and publication of multimedia from a mobile device|
|US8872646||Oct 8, 2008||Oct 28, 2014||Dp Technologies, Inc.||Method and system for waking up a device due to motion|
|US8902154||Jul 11, 2007||Dec 2, 2014||Dp Technologies, Inc.||Method and apparatus for utilizing motion user interface|
|US8949070||Feb 8, 2008||Feb 3, 2015||Dp Technologies, Inc.||Human activity monitoring device with activity identification|
|US8996332||Jun 23, 2009||Mar 31, 2015||Dp Technologies, Inc.||Program setting adjustments based on activity identification|
|U.S. Classification||42/70.11, 42/70.01|
|International Classification||F41A17/06, F41A17/08|
|Cooperative Classification||F41A17/066, F41A17/08, F41A17/06|
|European Classification||F41A17/08, F41A17/06, F41A17/06D|
|Feb 28, 2010||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|Apr 11, 2014||REMI||Maintenance fee reminder mailed|
|Aug 29, 2014||LAPS||Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees|
|Oct 21, 2014||FP||Expired due to failure to pay maintenance fee|
Effective date: 20140829