|Publication number||US7109717 B2|
|Application number||US 10/538,326|
|Publication date||Sep 19, 2006|
|Filing date||Dec 10, 2003|
|Priority date||Dec 10, 2002|
|Also published as||CN1723399A, CN100339724C, EP1579248A1, EP1579248A4, US20060038570, WO2004053528A1|
|Publication number||10538326, 538326, PCT/2003/39309, PCT/US/2003/039309, PCT/US/2003/39309, PCT/US/3/039309, PCT/US/3/39309, PCT/US2003/039309, PCT/US2003/39309, PCT/US2003039309, PCT/US200339309, PCT/US3/039309, PCT/US3/39309, PCT/US3039309, PCT/US339309, US 7109717 B2, US 7109717B2, US-B2-7109717, US7109717 B2, US7109717B2|
|Inventors||Steven C. Constable|
|Original Assignee||The Regents Of The University Of California|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (21), Non-Patent Citations (9), Referenced by (40), Classifications (7), Legal Events (4)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
This application claims the priority of U.S. provisional application Ser. No. 60/432,467, filed Dec. 10, 2002, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
The present invention relates to measurement of the electrical conductivity at the seafloor in a controlled source electromagnetic survey for monitoring sub-seafloor hydrocarbon reservoirs and, more particularly, to a system and method for monitoring sub-seafloor hydrocarbon reservoirs during extraction.
Measurement of electrical resistivity beneath the seafloor has assumed an important role in hydrocarbon, e.g., oil or natural gas, exploration and reservoir assessment and development. Seismic methods had traditionally been used for such purposes, however, the results could be ambiguous. Several electromagnetic methods have been developed for mapping sub-seafloor resistivity variations. See, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,770,945 of Constable (magnetotelluric methods), U.S. Pat. No. 6,522,146 of Srnka (controlled EM source), International Publication No. WO 03/048812 of MacGregor and Sinha (controlled EM source), and International Publication No. WO 01/57555 of Rees (controlled EM source). The disclosure of each of the identified patent documents is incorporated herein by reference. Controlled EM source (CSEM) methods are well known in the art and have become almost routine for mapping of electrical conductivity of the seafloor in very shallow to deep ocean water, achieving seafloor penetration depths as great as 30 km in 5 km of water. Such methods have provided significant economic savings in terms of avoiding the costs of drilling test wells into sub-seafloor structures that do not contain economically recoverable amounts of hydrocarbon. However, to date, applications of these methods to hydrocarbon reservoirs have been limited to identification and mapping of hydrocarbon-filled layers.
Once it has been located and tapped, it is important to monitor changes in the hydrocarbon reservoir during gas/oil extraction for optimal production. One existing technique involves the drilling of discrete monitoring wells, which, in addition to being expensive and time consuming, are incapable of providing a comprehensive image of reservoir geometry due to the small number of sampling locations. Another technique involves the placement of sensors in the extraction well or “well-logging”, in which the drill string is withdrawn, instruments are inserted for measurement then withdrawn, and the drill string is replaced. Other existing methods include repeated, or time lapse, seismic surveys, also known as 4-dimensional seismic modeling. Seismic surveys involve the use of air gun arrays to generate loud seismic pulses at the surface which are reflected by boundaries between the layers of rock and the hydrocarbon reservoir. The seismic method measures acoustic properties of the sub-seafloor structure, which are less well correlated with actual hydrocarbon content than is electrical resistivity. In addition, due to the hazards to those who operate the air gun or are located nearby and the damage to or disturbance of marine life in a wide area around the pulses, continuous or repeated seismic surveying is both undesirable and impractical for extended monitoring applications. Further, borehole seismic surveying involves expensive well down-time.
Accordingly, the need remains for a system and method for economically monitoring a reservoir over time for enhanced recovery of hydrocarbon from the reservoir with minimal damage to the environment from the monitoring technique.
It is an advantage of the present invention to provide a method for the continuous or repeated mapping of reservoir structure over a large area without the use of expensive wells.
Another advantage of the present invention is to provide a method for generating a comprehensive image of reservoir geometry.
Still another advantage of the present invention is to provide an improved controlled electromagnetic transmitter for use in measurement and monitoring of sub-seafloor hydrocarbon reservoirs.
According to the present invention, time changes in the electrical resistivity of sub-seafloor hydrocarbon reservoirs are monitored using electromagnetic methods involving a controlled electromagnetic source. Changes in estimated reservoir resistivity occur when oil and gas are replaced by water. Both the thickness and lateral extent of the reservoir can be monitored by this method. Such monitoring allows well positions and extraction rates to be optimized for total extraction over the life of the reservoir.
In a first exemplary embodiment, a plurality of conductive cables, each connected to a plurality of receiver electrodes, are distributed over the seafloor around a hydrocarbon production platform so that they extend over the area of the hydrocarbon reservoir. An electromagnetic (EM) transmitter is positioned on the platform and is connected via a separate set of cables to one or more transmitting electrode pairs which are positioned at or near the seafloor. Where multiple electrode pairs are provided, electric currents can be applied either simultaneously or sequentially between pairs of transmitting electrodes, which are positioned to produce vertical, radial and/or azimuthal electric fields. The reservoir depth also governs the distances between transmitting and receiving electrodes, with a general rule that the distance should be at least three times the reservoir depth. Transmission frequencies are determined by the depth of the reservoir and the electrical conductivity of overlying sediments, and are typically 0.25 Hz for 1 km deep reservoirs. Transmission electrodes can be laid horizontally on the seafloor or hung vertically from the platform. Electric fields across the receiver electrodes which result from the EM transmissions are monitored on the production platform. Amplification of the signals from the receiver electrodes can be applied using sub-sea amplifiers or amplifiers located on the platform.
The size and position of the electric fields at the transmission frequencies determines the extent and thickness of the reservoir. The radial electric field mode is most sensitive to the reservoir lateral dimensions. By installing transmitter and receiver electrodes permanently on the seafloor, variations in the amplitude of the received EM signals depend only on changes in the reservoir, and not on relative proximity of other geology that would occur if the electrodes were to be moved.
In a second exemplary embodiment, repeat surveys can be performed using a ship-towed controlled-source EM (CSEM) transmitter which is moved within an array of receiving antennae located on the seafloor. This array can be fixed in place extending over the reservoir, as in the first embodiment, or a plurality of seafloor data loggers, such as the logger disclosed in Pat. No. 5,770,945 or in co-pending International Application No. PCT US03/18522, which is incorporated herein by reference, may be distributed at locations over the reservoir. The data logger units may be deployed by the same vessel that is used to tow the transmitter or may be separately deployed in advance by one or more different vessels or using a crane or other structure located on a fixed platform. Reservoir depth determines transmitter-receiver distances. In this case, the distances between the towed transmitter and the receivers are preferably two times the reservoir depth.
In a first aspect of the present invention, a system is provided for real-time monitoring of a hydrocarbon reservoir over an interval of time during which there may be hydrocarbon extraction. The system includes a controlled source electromagnetic transmitter comprising at least one transmitting antenna for transmitting electromagnetic energy on a plurality occasions over the interval; a plurality of seafloor antennae distributed on the seafloor over an area corresponding to the reservoir, wherein each seafloor antenna comprises a receiver electrode array each providing a signal responsive to energy from the transmitter on each of the occasions; at least one data logging process for receiving on each occasion the signal from each of the antennae, the signal characterizing, in part, impedance of the reservoir, and for causing storage, for each occasion, of at least one parameter related to the signals received from the antennae; a clocking device for associating a time with respect to the at least one parameter stored; and a comparison process for identifying changes over time in the at least one parameter. Each seafloor antenna comprises a plurality of electrodes disposed at pre-determined distances along a conductive cable. The electromagnetic source assembly includes at least one vertical field transmitter for generating vertical electric fields that are measured on all receiver electrodes. Additional transmitters can be positioned for generating radial fields and/or azimuthal fields which are measured by all or selected receiver electrodes.
The transmitter comprises a controlled-source transmitter designed to produce the largest possible current in the waters at the seafloor through the transmitter cable. Because the signal is rapidly attenuated in water, the transmitter electrode array should be positioned close to the seafloor. In applications in which the source is towed by a vessel, it is important that the towed cable array be constructed so that it does not float. It is also preferable that the cable not be so heavy that it will be dragged directly on the seafloor to avoid damage to the cable and/or electrodes as well as to minimize environmental impact, e.g., damage to coral structures or seafloor structures associated with the hydrocarbon production. To achieve this balance, the desired construction for deep-towed cable should be neutrally buoyant. According to existing technology, copper conductors are encased in an oil-filled hose where the density of the oil is selected for neutral buoyancy. Such cables are heavy and difficult to handle and are subject to ruptures which can release the oil into the water and/or allow water to enter the cable. In the preferred embodiment of the present invention, an improved cable for deep-towed applications comprises a stranded aluminum power conductor made neutrally buoyant in seawater by encasing it in a thermoplastic elastomer (TPE) with density less than 1000 kg/m3.
The invention further provides a method for monitoring a sub-seafloor hydrocarbon reservoir over an interval of time during which hydrocarbon extraction may be occurring. The method includes distributing a plurality of receiver antennae on the seafloor over an area corresponding to the reservoir, wherein each antenna comprises a receiver electrode array; deploying at least one electromagnetic field transmitter at or near the seafloor above the reservoir; obtaining, on a plurality of occasions during the interval, from each of the receiver antennae, a signal responsive to energy from the transmitter, each signal characterizing in part impedance of the reservoir; storing, for each occasion, at least one parameter related to signals received from the antennae; and identifying changes over time in the at least one parameter. Sensitivity of the measurements to extraction of hydrocarbon can be controlled by selecting frequency and transmitter-receiver range to produce a ten-fold change in field strength during extraction. Multiple processors may be used and the data combined for measurement over large areas. The clocking device is further used to synchronize between the multiple processors and for stack time. The method for monitoring a hydrocarbon reservoir may be used during extraction and production to evaluate rate of extraction.
Understanding of the present invention will be facilitated by consideration of the following detailed description of a preferred embodiment of the present invention taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which like numerals refer to like parts and in which:
According to the present invention, time changes in the electrical resistivity of sub-seafloor hydrocarbon reservoirs are monitored to determine when oil or gas in the reservoir is replaced by water. Electromagnetic methods involving a controlled electromagnetic source are used. Both the thickness and lateral extent of the reservoir can be monitored by this method by taking measurements either continuously or at timed intervals so that rate of extraction can be determined. Such monitoring allows well positions and extraction rates to be optimized for total extraction over the life of the reservoir.
As is known in the art, hydrocarbon reservoirs may be found under lakes and rivers as well as oceans. Accordingly, for purposes of the description herein, the term “seafloor” is used to refer generally to the bottom of a body of water within which a sufficient level of electrical conduction can occur for measurement, and is not intended to be limited to the ocean bottom.
The size and position of the electric fields at the transmission frequencies is used to determine the extent and thickness of the reservoir. By installing transmitter and receiver electrodes permanently on the seafloor, variations in the amplitude of the received EM signals depend only on changes in the reservoir, and not on relative proximity of other geology that would occur if the electrodes were to be moved.
An electromagnetic field (EM) transmitter 10 is located on the platform 2, electrically connected to one or more transmitter antennae 12. The transmitter 10 comprises a controlled-source transmitter designed to produce the largest possible current in the waters at the seafloor through the transmitter cable. Because the signal is rapidly attenuated in water, the transmitter electrode array is preferably positioned close to the seafloor within the constraints of transmitter-receiver separation. Where multiple electrode pairs are provided, electric currents can be applied either simultaneously or sequentially between pairs of transmitting electrodes, which are positioned to produce vertical, radial and/or azimuthal electric fields. Transmission frequencies are determined by the depth of the reservoir and the electrical conductivity of overlying sediments, and are typically 0.25 Hz for 1 km deep reservoirs. Transmission electrodes can be laid horizontally on the seafloor or hung vertically from the platform.
In the example illustrated in
An array of receiver antennae 26 are distributed around the seafloor 8 to overlie the area of reservoir 4. The receiver array is connected to a multi-channel amplifier 62 which receives and amplifies the antenna signals for transmission to data logging processor 70 which stores the data collected by the antennae over time. (For purposes of the claimed invention, unless the context otherwise requires, the term “time” refers to at least one of the date or the time of day.) A clocking device, which may be housed within the processor housing and, therefore, is not separately shown in the figure, provides a timing signal to the processor for synchronization for use in signal stacking and phase determination. The clocking device may be any device that is capable of generating an accurate timing signal and may include, for example, a crystal oscillator, an integrated circuit device, a GPS receiver, or some combination thereof. Selection of an appropriate clocking device will be apparent to one of skill in the art.
The stack times are recorded by the processor as references for the stored signal data. The amplifier 62 and data logging processor 70 may be located on the platform 2 or below the surface of the water, protected by a water-tight housing. Referring still to the exemplary embodiment shown in
Although one transmitter will typically be monitored by many receivers, in the exemplary embodiment, for each radial receiver antenna there is a corresponding transmitter antenna for generating the radial EM field to be detected by the receiver antenna. These transmitter antennae can be activated either simultaneously or sequentially. Readings are taken off of the receiver antennae to provide a measurement of the radial extent of the reservoir in a direction corresponding to the radial orientation of the receiver antennae. As illustrated in
While it generally does not respond well to variations in resistivity, an azimuthal field is useful as a control signal for providing a measurement of background resistivity. The background resistivity can then be subtracted from the measurements taken using vertical and/or radial fields to provide a background-corrected resistivity measurement. No additional transmitters or receivers are required to measure azimuthal field. Instead, different combinations of the transmitter electrodes and receiver electrodes used for radial measurement can be selected to generate and measure the azimuthal field. For example, referring to
It may be desirable to perform a magnetotelluric (MT) sounding to determine corrections to the CSEM data. The MT data can provide a baseline measurement for sediment conductivity or noise cancellation within the CSEM data. While CSEM methods are very effective at resolving resistive features in the sub-seafloor structure, magnetotellurics (MT) is better at resolving conductive features. The MT method uses measurement of naturally occurring electromagnetic fields to determine the electrical resistivity, or conductivity, of subsurface rocks. There are certain advantages to combining the two techniques to obtain increased accuracy and resolution, particularly in areas of shallow resistive rocks such as basalt.
In one combined application, the MT method can be used as a reference for purposes of noise cancellation from the CSEM data. Specifically, the largest source of noise in the CSEM data below about 0.3 Hz (the exact frequency depends on water depth) is MT signals. Since the MT signals are spatially uniform, it is possible to take time series measurements of magnetic and/or electric fields outside the monitoring array, then use these measurements to subtract MT noise from the monitoring measurements. Applications of this method in a different setting (submarine detection) report up to 40 dB noise reduction.
In another application, MT can be used to improve interpretation of CSEM data. The MT method is preferentially sensitive to conductive parts of the sub-seafloor structure, which in this case, is the sedimentary rocks above and below the reservoir. Because the MT method is almost completely insensitive to thin resistive layers, unless the reservoir is relatively thick and relatively shallow, there will be no response in the MT data. This provides a mechanism to ensure that changes in the CSEM monitoring data are the result of the reservoir depletion and not caused by changes in the sediment conductivity. Repeat measurements of the MT response over the reservoir can be used to monitor sediment conductivity independently of the CSEM monitoring array. Logger units, such as those described in Pat. No. 5,770,945, which include magnetic field induction sensors for use in MT surveys, can be used for both EM and MT measurement. Alternatively, separate detection systems may be used.
Measurement of the vertical field 48, which provides an estimate of the lateral changes in resistivity of the reservoir, i.e., shows the edges, is performed by all receiver electrodes in the antenna array. For example, electrodes 30 a–30 d of receiver antenna 26 a can be used to estimate the reservoir thickness at the location corresponding to the area under antenna 26 a. Similarly, signals from other receiver antennae 26 b–26 g may be read sequentially or in one or more combinations to estimate the reservoir thickness at the location in the reservoir corresponding to the location of the antenna at which the signal is detected.
For dealing with the various combinations of receiver cables and electrodes, a pre-amplifier powered over the cable can be provided for each node of the cable. The amplified signals are then transmitted to the logging processor 70 on the platform. An ADC channel is provided for every cable pair allowing them to be monitored simultaneously. Then, only the transmitter would be switched to generate the different electric fields.
In a second embodiment, repeat surveys can be performed using a ship-towed controlled-source EM transmitter which is moved within an array of receiving antenna located on the seafloor. This array can be fixed in place extending over the reservoir, as in the first embodiment, or a plurality of seafloor data logger units, such as the logger unit disclosed in Pat. No. 5,770,945 or in co-pending International Application No. PCT US03/18522, which is incorporated herein by reference, may be distributed at locations over the reservoir. The data logger units may be deployed by the same vessel that is used to tow the transmitter or may be separately deployed in advance by one or more different vessels or using a crane or other structure located on a fixed platform.
Repeat surveys can be accomplished using a marine controlled-source electromagnetic transmitter 202 towed by a ship 200 or other vessel, as shown in
The transmitter unit 202, as illustrated in
The transmitter electronics 206 include a step-down power transformer for converting the high voltage power from the deeptow cable 210 to low voltage, high current power for the transmitter 202. The output from the power transformer is full-wave rectified and switched to a lower transmission frequency (10 Hz to 0.01 Hz) using either a silicon controlled rectifier (SCR) bridge and control circuit, as described by Constable and Cox (“Marine controlled source electromagnetic sounding 2. The PEGASUS experiment”, J. Geophys. Res., 101, pp. 5519–5530, 1996), or conversion to direct current using a full-wave rectifier bridge of power diodes and the switching of the resulting DC current using integrated gate bipolar transistors (IGBTs).
An electromechanical cable 210 transfers power from the step up transformer into the deeptowed transmitter 202. Because the signal is rapidly attenuated in water, the transmitter antenna 208 should be positioned close to the seafloor, therefore, it is important that the towed cable array be constructed so that it does not float. It is also preferable that the cable not be so heavy that it will be dragged directly on the seafloor to avoid damage to the cable and/or electrodes as well as to minimize environmental impact, e.g., damage to coral structures or to artificial structures associated with the hydrocarbon extraction. To achieve this balance, the desired construction for deep-towed cable 210 should be neutrally buoyant. According to existing technology, copper conductors are encased in an oil-filled hose where the density of the oil is selected for neutral buoyancy. (See, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 4,634,804.) Such cables can be difficult to handle and are subject to ruptures which can release the oil into the water and allow water to enter the cable. In the preferred embodiment of the present invention, an improved cable for deep-towed applications comprises a metal power conductor made neutrally buoyant in seawater by encasing it in a thermoplastic elastomer (TPE) with density less than 1000 kg/m3. In the preferred embodiment, a stranded aluminum conductor is selected for lightness, however, other metals, including copper, can be used. An exemplary cross-section of the cable 210 is illustrated in
In a third embodiment of the receiver configuration, permanent anchors can be installed at positions across the seafloor over the reservoir area, for example, in a configuration similar to that shown in
Selection of the optimum transmission frequency maximizes the ability to detect changes in the hydrocarbon reservoir thickness using the resistivity data obtained from electric fields remote from the transmitter. This optimum frequency is determined by the water depth, depth of the reservoir, electrical resistivity of the sediments over the reservoir, and the noise floor of the measuring system. This frequency may be found using computer modeling of a seafloor with layered structure of
The one fixed parameter is the voltage noise floor of the amplifier and electrode system, VNf. The power of the voltage noise floor is about 10−18 V2/Hz between 0.1 and 10 Hz. This is close to the Johnson (thermal) noise limit of the electrode system, and while this may be improved somewhat, it is unlikely to be changed dramatically. The amplitude of the noise floor (Nf) of a controlled source EM system, i.e., the smallest signal that can be measured with a signal to noise ratio of 1, is given by
where Bw is the bandwidth of the measurement (the stacking or measurement time), Dm is the dipole moment (in Amp-meters) of the transmitter, and LRA is the receiving antenna length.
Typical values for Dm would be 104 (100 amp transmission into a 100 meter antenna. Note that the current can range from as low as 10 amps up to 1000 amps.) Typical values for LRA would be 100 m for a fixed system and 10 m for a deployed receiver. The noise floor can be improved by increasing the length of both the transmitter and receiver antennas, however, spatial resolution will be reduced.
For a fixed installation according to the first embodiment, transmission can be continuous, with a tradeoff between temporal resolution and noise floor. By stacking measurements over one day, a noise floor of 3×10−8 V/m/(Am) is obtained. This can be lowered to 1×10−18 V/m/(Am) with a one-week measurement. By summing measurements over one year, a noise floor of 10−19 V/m/(Am) can be approached. This probably represents the smallest measurement that can be made in practice.
For a repeat survey using deployed receivers and a ship-towed transmitter as in the second embodiment, bandwidths of a few minutes are possible before the transmitter location has changed significantly. Using 2 minutes and the above typical parameters, one gets a noise floor of 10−5 V/m/(Am).
The contour lines in
Any combination of range and frequency that produces a factor of 10 or greater change in electric fields will be useful for the proposed method. Smaller changes may also be useful if other variations in environmental resistivity are not a problem.
The effect of depleting the reservoir on the measured electric fields can be predicted/modeled. With reference to the example shown in
A change in sediment resistivity would also create a change in the radial electric field. However, it is unlikely that sediment resistivity would change enough to produce an order of magnitude change in the electric field. Furthermore, a change in overburden resistivity would also produce a change in azimuthal horizontal electric field, shown as a broken line in
The method for monitoring a sub-seafloor hydrocarbon reservoir comprises locating an array of receiver antennae on the seafloor to cover an area corresponding to the location and dimensions of the sub-seafloor hydrocarbon reservoir. The receiver array can be permanently fixed or can be removably deployed using a plurality of data logger units or receiver antenna attached to permanent anchors. An electromagnetic field transmitter is positioned at or near the seafloor above the reservoir using either a fixed installation on a platform or a ship, which tows the transmitter. The platform may be above the water or on the seafloor The transmitter is activated to generate a first electromagnetic field which is detected using one or more antenna within the receiver array. The entire reservoir can be tested by sequential activation of multiple transmitters, which can be used to generate vertical fields, radial fields or azimuthal fields. The detected signals correspond to the first electromagnetic field subjected to the reservoir resistivity at the position corresponding to the location of the receiving antenna. The signal generated by the receiving antenna is amplified and data corresponding to the signal is logged using a data logging processor. The data logging processor is synchronized for signal stacking and phase measurement. The logged data is processed for real-time monitoring of electromagnetic parameters on the sub-seafloor, wherein the electromagnetic parameters correspond to changes in reservoir resistivity for determination of one or more of lateral extent, uniformity and depth of the reservoir. Multiple processors may be used and the data combined for measurement over large areas. The method for monitoring a hydrocarbon reservoir may be used during extraction and production to evaluate rate of extraction.
Other embodiments and modifications of the present invention will occur readily to those of ordinary skill in the art in view of these teachings. Therefore, this invention is to be limited only by the following claims which include all such other embodiments and modifications when viewed in conjunction with the above specification and accompanying drawings.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US2293024||Feb 5, 1940||Aug 11, 1942||Esme E Rosaire||Method of electrical prospecting|
|US2531088||Oct 16, 1947||Nov 21, 1950||Standard Oil Dev Co||Electrical prospecting method|
|US2839721||Oct 21, 1955||Jun 17, 1958||Continental Oil Co||Apparatus for logging the ocean floor|
|US2872638||Mar 31, 1955||Feb 3, 1959||California Research Corp||Ocean bottom stratigraphy surveying|
|US3052836||Dec 24, 1957||Sep 4, 1962||Shell Oil Co||Method for marine electrical prospecting|
|US3182259||Jan 6, 1961||May 4, 1965||Holder Floyd P||Submodulation systems for carrier recreation and doppler correction in single-sideband zero-carrier communications|
|US4047098||Jul 24, 1975||Sep 6, 1977||Jean Duroux||Process and a device for prospecting the ocean bed by measuring electromagnetic fields|
|US4298840||May 7, 1979||Nov 3, 1981||Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij B.V.||Plural electrode method and means for water bottom logging|
|US4617518||Nov 21, 1983||Oct 14, 1986||Exxon Production Research Co.||Method and apparatus for offshore electromagnetic sounding utilizing wavelength effects to determine optimum source and detector positions|
|US4634804 *||May 17, 1985||Jan 6, 1987||Geco Geophysical Company Incorporated||Streamer cable with protective sheaths for conductor bundle|
|US5770945||Jun 26, 1996||Jun 23, 1998||The Regents Of The University Of California||Seafloor magnetotelluric system and method for oil exploration|
|US6480000||Jun 17, 1999||Nov 12, 2002||Den Norske Stats Oljeselskap A.S.||Device and method for measurement of resistivity outside of a wellpipe|
|US6603313||Sep 6, 2000||Aug 5, 2003||Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company||Remote reservoir resistivity mapping|
|US20030043692||Apr 16, 2002||Mar 6, 2003||Svein Ellingsrud||Method and apparatus for determining the nature of subterranean reservoirs|
|US20030048105||Aug 7, 2002||Mar 13, 2003||Svein Ellingsrud||Method and apparatus for determining the nature of subterranean reservoirs|
|US20030052685||Aug 7, 2002||Mar 20, 2003||Statoil Asa||Method and apparatus for determining the nature of subterranean reservoirs|
|US20050077902 *||Nov 28, 2002||Apr 14, 2005||Macgregor Lucy M||Electromagnetic surveying for hydrocarbon reservoirs|
|US20050264294 *||Jun 11, 2003||Dec 1, 2005||Constable Steven C||Method and system for seafloor geological survey using vertical electric field measurement|
|WO2001020366A1||Sep 8, 2000||Mar 22, 2001||Exxonmobil Upstream Res Co||Remote reservoir resistivity mapping|
|WO2001057555A1||Feb 1, 2001||Aug 9, 2001||Norske Stats Oljeselskap||Method and apparatus for determining the nature of subterranean reservoirs|
|WO2003048812A1||Nov 28, 2002||Jun 12, 2003||Lucy M Macgregor||Electromagnetic surveying for hydrocarbon reservoirs|
|1||Constable, S., et al., "Marine controlled-source electromagnetic sounding 2. The PEGASUS experiment" Journal of Geophysical Research, vol. 101, No. B3, pp. 5519-5530 (Mar. 10, 1996).|
|2||Cox, C.S., et al., "Controlled-source electromagnetic sounding of the oceanic lithosphere" (Mar. 6, 1986) Nature, vol. 320, No. 6057, pp. 52-54.|
|3||Eidesmo, T., et al., "Sea Bed Logging (SBL), a new method for remote and direct identification of hydrocarbon filled layers in deepwater areas", First Break vol. 20.3 (Mar. 2002), pp. 144-152.|
|4||Ellingsrud, S., et al., "Remote sensing of hydrocarbon layers by seabed logging (SBL): Results from a cruise offshore Angola", The Leading Edge (Oct. 2002), pp. 972-982.|
|5||Everett, Mark E., et al., "Effects ofnear-surface conductance on global satellite induction responses", Geophysical Journal International, 15:37 (Mar. 7, 2003), pp. 277-286.|
|6||Flosadottir, A.H., et al., "Marine controlled-source electromagnetic sounding 1. Modeling and experimental design" Journal of Geophysical Research, vol. 101, No. B3, pp. 5507-5517 (Mar. 19, 1996).|
|7||MacGregor, L, et al., "Electrical resistivity structure of the Valu Fa Ridge, Lau Basin, from marine controlled-soiurce electromagnetic sounding", Geophys. J. Int. (2001) 146, 217-236.|
|8||Paul, A.C., "Evolution of Wireline Well-Logging Technique (The Eye of Oil Industry) in India and Advances Beyond 2000", Geohorizons, Jan. 2002.|
|9||Sinha, M.C., et al., "An Active Source Electroagnetic Sounding System for Marine Use" Marine Geophysical Researches 12:59-68 (1990).|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US7482813||Aug 25, 2005||Jan 27, 2009||The Regents Of The University Of California||Three-axis marine electric field sensor for seafloor electrical resistivity measurement|
|US7504829||Nov 23, 2006||Mar 17, 2009||Westerngeco L.L.C.||Methods and apparatus for subsurface geophysical exploration using joint inversion of steady-state and transient data|
|US7657391||Jul 14, 2006||Feb 2, 2010||Westerngeco L.L.C.||Electromagnetically detecting thin resistive bodies in shallow water and terrestrial environments|
|US7683625 *||Jun 29, 2005||Mar 23, 2010||Ohm Limited||Electromagnetic surveying|
|US7728596 *||Jun 15, 2006||Jun 1, 2010||Evgenij Dmitrievich Lisitsyn||Method and device for sea electrical survey of oil-and-gas deposits|
|US7800374 *||Feb 23, 2010||Sep 21, 2010||Kjt Enterprises, Inc.||Multi-component marine electromagnetic signal acquisition cable and system|
|US7860655 *||Jul 18, 2007||Dec 28, 2010||Westerngeco L.L.C.||Electromagnetically detecting thin resistive bodies in shallow water and terrestrial environments|
|US7872477 *||Apr 30, 2007||Jan 18, 2011||Kjt Enterprises, Inc.||Multi-component marine electromagnetic signal acquisition cable and system|
|US8026723||Jun 8, 2009||Sep 27, 2011||Kjt Enterprises, Inc.||Multi-component marine electromagnetic signal acquisition method|
|US8148992||May 13, 2008||Apr 3, 2012||Ocean Floor Geophysics, Inc.||Underwater electric field electromagnetic prospecting system|
|US8183868||May 18, 2007||May 22, 2012||Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company||Method to maintain towed dipole source orientation|
|US8253418||Aug 30, 2007||Aug 28, 2012||The Regents Of The University Of California||Method and system for detecting and mapping hydrocarbon reservoirs using electromagnetic fields|
|US8259534 *||Feb 14, 2009||Sep 4, 2012||“Emmet” Jsc||Generator device for marine geophysical research|
|US8386182||Mar 25, 2009||Feb 26, 2013||Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company||Method for electromagnetic prospecting waveform design|
|US8538699||Jul 30, 2007||Sep 17, 2013||Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company||Rapid inversion of electromagnetic reconnaissance survey data|
|US8547783||Oct 30, 2008||Oct 1, 2013||Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company||Method and apparatus for evaluating submarine formations|
|US8554482||May 5, 2009||Oct 8, 2013||Baker Hughes Incorporated||Monitoring reservoirs using array based controlled source electromagnetic methods|
|US9195783||Jun 27, 2011||Nov 24, 2015||Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company||Reducing the dimensionality of the joint inversion problem|
|US9207355 *||Mar 29, 2012||Dec 8, 2015||Baker Hughes Incorporated||Method for physical modeling of reservoirs|
|US9239401 *||Mar 1, 2012||Jan 19, 2016||Pgs Geophysical As||Stationary source for marine electromagnetic surveying|
|US20060001428 *||Jun 29, 2005||Jan 5, 2006||James Milne||Electromagnetic surveying|
|US20080007265 *||Sep 14, 2007||Jan 10, 2008||James Milne||Electromagnetic surveying|
|US20080015779 *||Jul 14, 2006||Jan 17, 2008||Schlumberger Technology Corporation||Electromagnetically Detecting Thin Resistive Bodies in Shallow Water and Terrestrial Environments|
|US20080015809 *||Jul 18, 2007||Jan 17, 2008||Schlumberger Technology Corporation||Electromagnetically Detecting Thin Resistive Bodies in Shallow Water and Terrestrial Environments|
|US20080094066 *||Nov 23, 2006||Apr 24, 2008||Watts Michael D||Methods and apparatus for subsurface geophysical exploration using joint inversion of steady-state and transient data|
|US20080094067 *||Aug 25, 2005||Apr 24, 2008||Constable Steven C||Three-axis marine electric field sensor for seafloor electrical resistivity measurement|
|US20080265895 *||Apr 30, 2007||Oct 30, 2008||Strack Kurt M||Multi-component marine electromagnetic signal acquisition cable and system|
|US20090085569 *||Jun 15, 2006||Apr 2, 2009||Evgenij Dmitrievich Lisitsyn||Method and Device for Sea Electrical Survey of Oil-and-Gas Deposits|
|US20090243616 *||Jun 8, 2009||Oct 1, 2009||Kjt Enterprises, Inc.||Multi-component marine electromagnetic signal acquisition method|
|US20090262031 *||Oct 22, 2009||Evgenij Dmitrievich Lisitsyn||Generator device for marine geophysical research|
|US20100060286 *||May 18, 2007||Mar 11, 2010||Exxon-Mobil Upstream Research Company||Method to maintain towed dipole source orientation|
|US20100148783 *||Feb 23, 2010||Jun 17, 2010||Kjt Enterprises, Inc.||Multi-component marine electromagnetic signal aquisition cable and system|
|US20100250140 *||Aug 30, 2007||Sep 30, 2010||The Regents Of The University Of California||Method and System for Detecting and Mapping Hydrocarbon Reservoirs Using Electromagnetic Fields|
|US20100286915 *||May 5, 2009||Nov 11, 2010||Baker Hughes Incorporated||Monitoring Reservoirs Using Array Based Controlled Source Electromagnetic Methods|
|US20120303347 *||Mar 29, 2012||Nov 29, 2012||Baker Hughes Incorporated||Method for physical modeling of reservoirs|
|US20130229184 *||Mar 1, 2012||Sep 5, 2013||Pgs Geophysical As||Stationary Source for Marine Electromagnetic Surveying|
|WO2007053251A1 *||Sep 25, 2006||May 10, 2007||James J Carazzone||Method for phase and amplitude correction in controlled source electromagnetic survey data|
|WO2008008127A2 *||May 18, 2007||Jan 17, 2008||Exxonmobil Upstream Res Co||Method to maintain towed dipole source orientation|
|WO2008150748A1 *||May 26, 2008||Dec 11, 2008||Vickery Keith||Method for determining the absolute orientation of subsea electromagnetic sensor arrays|
|WO2009075961A1 *||Oct 30, 2008||Jun 18, 2009||Exxonmobil Upstream Res Co||Method and apparatus for evaluating submarine formations|
|International Classification||G01V3/15, G01V3/12|
|Cooperative Classification||G01V3/083, G01V3/12|
|European Classification||G01V3/08F, G01V3/12|
|Apr 6, 2004||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, CALIF
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:CONSTABLE, STEVEN C.;REEL/FRAME:015184/0173
Effective date: 20040311
|Jun 2, 2006||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, CALIF
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:CONSTABLE, STEVEN C.;REEL/FRAME:017715/0665
Effective date: 20040311
|Mar 19, 2010||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|Mar 19, 2014||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 8