|Publication number||US7117660 B1|
|Application number||US 09/958,868|
|Publication date||Oct 10, 2006|
|Filing date||Apr 12, 2000|
|Priority date||Apr 12, 2000|
|Publication number||09958868, 958868, PCT/2000/34, PCT/BE/0/000034, PCT/BE/0/00034, PCT/BE/2000/000034, PCT/BE/2000/00034, PCT/BE0/000034, PCT/BE0/00034, PCT/BE0000034, PCT/BE000034, PCT/BE2000/000034, PCT/BE2000/00034, PCT/BE2000000034, PCT/BE200000034, US 7117660 B1, US 7117660B1, US-B1-7117660, US7117660 B1, US7117660B1|
|Original Assignee||Colens Andre|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (15), Referenced by (17), Classifications (9), Legal Events (3)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
The present invention relates to an improved robot lawn mower more particularly adapted for the care of large surfaces.
In order to care for large lawn surfaces, of the order of several hectares, motor-driven self-propelled mowers with conductors are used. To this end, the use of robot lawn mowers would provide a number of advantages, particularly as regards manpower and environmental impact.
Nevertheless, the robot lawn mowers which have been disclosed to date, e.g. in document EP 0 550 473 B1 have certain drawbacks when used over large surfaces. The cutting width and the power of the machine must be increased. This requires the implementation of new solutions.
Hence, the use of large robot lawn mowers, e.g. having a width of 80 cm to 200 cm, implies a security problem generated by the power of the cutting means of the device. This problem may be solved by dividing the cutting system into a large number of independent elements, each having a reduced power and self-retractable blades. Such a system is proposed, for instance in the application PCT/BE98/00038.
Yet, further problems remain. For instance, grass “scalping”, caused by a rotary lawn mowing system in irregular lawns, the problem of accurate and simultaneous adjustment of a number of cutting heads, and the lack of self-adaptation to grass height. The latter aspect is important for robots designed to work intermittently over large surfaces, the grass height being variable with time, robot operating time, and exact location of the lawn.
Moreover, the driving wheels of a large robot lawn mower are generally the rear wheels, typically having a significantly greater diameter than the front free wheels.
These wheels tend to provide a swing up torque, from the front of the device, when several cutting heads hit an irregularity of the ground. A lack of horizontal stability results therefrom, as well as a jump of the front of the device during its advance.
These drawbacks are more particularly, but not exclusively, associated to large robot lawn mowers. Therefore, the solutions proposed by the invention may advantageously apply to smaller devices.
The present invention particularly proposes a robot lawn mower having, individually or in combination, the following characteristics:
The combination of certain or all of these different original characteristics provides an effective robot device, which is still simple in construction and has an acceptable power.
Heads, e.g. five in number, may be assembled along a single line transverse to the progression of the device chassis, or in several offset lines.
The cutting heads are independently fastened to a chassis of the lawn mower, for instance to a tubular aluminum chassis, by an assembly designed to pivot freely with respect to one or more transverse pillars. This integration may be effected by means of parallel arms, which form a parallelogram and are articulated to rotating points on the transverse member. This assembly allows a constrained vertical translational movement of the head, thereby ensuring a certain floatability with respect to ground irregularities.
According to an embodiment of the invention, said cutting heads are integral with elastic ties, for instance springs, allowing to at least partly compensate for the head weight. Springs may be, for instance, tension or torsion springs. Hence, the apparent weight of the cutting head, i.e. the effort to be exerted to lift it when the central abutment contacts the ground, is considerably reduced. Assuming that a cutting head has a starting weight of 1 kg, an adequate compensation allows, for instance, to reduce the lifting effort to a few hundreds of grams.
This embodiment of the invention allows to increase the horizontal stability of the device, while reducing the lifting torque of the front part, caused by the rear driving wheels. This effect may be highly disturbing in a descending regression, which may reach 35% for the device. The jump during progression on an irregular ground is strongly reduced thereby.
The robot device is provided with a central abutment, localized or integrated under the cutting member of the head, and allowing each head to follow lawn profile independently, and with no excessive friction. According to a first embodiment, the abutment consists of a central boss, e.g. having a hemispherical shape, being a part of, integral with or integrated in the center of the lower face of the cutting disk. This abutment, which projects (e.g. 2 to 4 cm), rotates even when it occasionally contacts the ground.
The central abutment advantageously allows to bring all friction towards the rotation center of the disk, whereby it reduces the friction torque and its braking effect on the disk rotation.
According to a second embodiment, the abutment is provided on a second disk, which is coaxial to the cutting disk, and situated below the latter. The second disk advantageously rotates freely with respect to the cutting disk. A similar arrangement, already forming an anti-scalping system, which has self-cleaning features thanks to the centrifugal debris expulsion, but with no central abutment, is disclosed in the application PCT/BE96/00012.
In the two modes mentioned above, when the cutting disk or the freely rotating disk contacts the ground, the torque exerted on the axis of the disk/s is reduced or even removed, due to the fact that contact essentially or exclusively occurs on the central abutment.
It shall be noted that the above central abutments may be independently adjustable, or interchangeable, for instance by simple snapping action, in such a manner as to be adaptable to the nature of lawns having various irregularities and to the desired minimum mowing height.
According to another aspect of the invention, a centralized control system is provided for the cutting heads. In accordance with an embodiment, a transverse stop or abutment plate, for side abutment of a member of the cutting head or a member which is integral, e.g. rigidly, with the cutting head, allowing to define a minimum value for the distance between the head and the ground. This stop plate may be height-adjusted.
According to a simplified embodiment, a stem may be manually adjusted to control, by a simple and intrinsically known mechanism, the height of the stop plate and the nominal height value of the cutting heads with respect to the ground.
In accordance with a variant, this stem is directly controlled by a motor and an electronic control box, which allows an automatic adjustment of the cutting head/s as a function of an algorithm stored in the inboard computer, which algorithm accounts, for instance, for the speed of the device and/or the resistance to the rotation of the cutting disk and/or the inclination of the device and/or the moisture degree of the surface to be mowed.
To this effect, according to another aspect of the invention, an automatic height control process is proposed for the cutting head/s.
In fact, the mowing principle used by the robot lawn mowers of the present invention, advantageously relates to frequent, sometimes even permanent, mowing operations. The robot cuts little by little at each run, the collection of grass debris being useless, the latter decomposing and fertilizing the lawn as they are generated.
Nevertheless, it may happen that, at the beginning of the season, or after an extended idleness of the machine, or even for a new definition of the surface to be mowed, the grass has grown or is too high and that the machine adjusted to its nominal height (e.g. by means of a lever) cuts an excessive height of grass, which generates an unattractive aspect, and a great amount of grass debris, deteriorating the lawn. The control process proposed by the invention allows to obviate the above drawbacks.
According to this automatic control process, when the lawn mower is started, the microprocessor controls the cutting head/s to be lifted to their maximum height. Heads will be lowered only once the mower has started.
The microprocessor constantly analyzes the average rotational speed of the cutting disk/s. As long as the latter is higher than a predefined value Vr, a value which corresponds to the speed of heads when they cut a grass height to be never exceeded, the microprocessor keeps on controlling the heads to be lowered, towards the nominal value. If the average rotational speed decreases below Vr, the lowering movement is stopped to be only resumed when the cut resistance decreases.
Thanks to this arrangement, the lawn mower never cuts more than a predetermined height at a time, and the grass height progressively tends towards its nominal value, while maintaining an attractive aspect.
Therefore, the disclosed apparatus allows to improve the self-adapting feature of the machine. Besides a regular mowing operation, the microprocessor may also use the apparatus to improve features of obstacle bypassing, tree root release, or passage above dead leaf carpets.
The latter case is particularly advantageous, the presence of the leaf carpet being the source of a number of operating difficulties for a standalone robot lawn mower having a limited power. In Autumn, large dead leaf carpets appear beneath and besides trees. When the robot passes above this carpet, a substantial amount of leaves may be trapped in the cutting head/s, which may occasionally cause the machine to be locked or stopped. According to the invention, when the microprocessor detects a resistance above the normal at the cutting disks and over a certain distance, the microprocessor controls the stepping motor to perform a head lifting operation to the maximum, before lowering them progressively according to the above method.
The invention will be better understood with reference to the drawings illustrated by way of example only.
With reference to
The cutting heads 10 are fastened to the tubular chassis of the lawn mower (longitudinal and transverse members 9, 9′) by means of parallel arms 11 which form a parallelogram and are articulated at the pivoting points 12. This assembly allows the vertical translational movement of the head relative to the chassis.
Elastic ties are also illustrated, in the form of tension springs 13, allowing to at least partly compensate for the head weight, hence to stabilize the device on an irregular ground.
A lateral stop plate or abutment 15, whereon an extension 20 of the cutting head abuts allows to define a minimum value of the distance between the head and the ground. This stop plate may be adjusted in height, from 25 to 65 mm, by being pivoted about the axis 16 under the effect of a lever 17, itself driven through a stem 18. The edge of the stop plate designed to receive the abutting extensions 20 of the cutting heads 10 is advantageously covered with a rubber sheath (not shown) to absorb shocks due to ground irregularities. In a simplified embodiment, the stem 18 acts on the nominal height of the cutting head/s 1 by being adjusted manually through an adjustment screw 21 (
In accordance with a particularly advantageous variant (
The robot device of this invention is particularly suitable for the care of large grass surfaces like those of golf courses.
The care of golf courses involves an important manpower effort, and automation thereof is an apparent advantage.
Hence, mowing “fairways” can represent about 80% of maintenance charges and implies very particular requirements. One of the latter consists in obtaining a degressive height from the periphery to the center of the fairway. Lawn mowing may be performed, for instance, at an height of 8 cm over 4 meters width, at an height of 6 cm over the next 4 m width toward the center, at an height of 4 cm over the next 4 m and at an height of 2 cm at the center. The automatic height control, possibly combined with circular band lawn mowing, such as described in this application allows a wholly automatic control of this mowing type.
Thanks to constant measurement of the course by a peripheral delimiting wire of the working surface such as the one described in patents EP 0550 472 B1 and 0 744 093 B1, the machine constantly determines its distance from the wire and allows to control the cutting height as a function of said distance. Lawn mowing will be effected in parallel bands starting from the periphery and with a degressive cutting height, in a near-continuous manner or through sections, as described above.
The invention addresses any novel element of the present description, that, as will be understood by the skilled person, may be considered in standalone or combined configurations.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3548570 *||Sep 11, 1967||Dec 22, 1970||Thomson Intern Co The||Cutter blade continuously automatically adjustable responsive to change in resistance to its operation|
|US4133404 *||Aug 25, 1976||Jan 9, 1979||Agile Systems, Inc.||Automatic lawn mower|
|US4777785 *||Dec 23, 1986||Oct 18, 1988||Rafaels Raymond J||Method of guiding a robotic lawnmower|
|US4817372||Jan 28, 1988||Apr 4, 1989||Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha||Power lawn mower|
|US4831813 *||Sep 25, 1987||May 23, 1989||Andre Jonas||System for automatic performance of agricultural tasks such as lawn mowing|
|US4873819 *||Aug 12, 1988||Oct 17, 1989||Shivers Charles C||Grass trimmer|
|US4887415 *||Jun 10, 1988||Dec 19, 1989||Martin Robert L||Automated lawn mower or floor polisher|
|US5004234 *||Jun 6, 1990||Apr 2, 1991||Hollis Ray A||Adjustable batting tee|
|US5461292 *||Jul 18, 1994||Oct 24, 1995||Zondlo; Robert||Remote controlled guidance system for working vehicle|
|US5906051 *||Apr 3, 1998||May 25, 1999||Nannen; William G.||Height adjustable anti-gouging ground guide system for vegetation trimmer|
|US5974347 *||Mar 14, 1997||Oct 26, 1999||Nelson; Russell G.||Automated lawn mower|
|US6009358 *||Jun 25, 1997||Dec 28, 1999||Thomas G. Xydis||Programmable lawn mower|
|US6255793 *||Nov 7, 1995||Jul 3, 2001||Friendly Robotics Ltd.||Navigation method and system for autonomous machines with markers defining the working area|
|US6338013 *||Jul 12, 1999||Jan 8, 2002||Bryan John Ruffner||Multifunctional mobile appliance|
|WO1998041081A1||Mar 18, 1998||Sep 24, 1998||Solar And Robotics S.A.||Improvements to self-propelled lawn mower|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US7963092 *||Aug 2, 2010||Jun 21, 2011||Chervon Limited||Trimmer with cutting height adjustment|
|US8234848||Jul 28, 2010||Aug 7, 2012||Deere & Company||Robotic mower height of cut adjustment assembly|
|US8275506||Jun 8, 2009||Sep 25, 2012||Richard Anthony Bishel||Boundary sensor|
|US8428776||Jun 18, 2010||Apr 23, 2013||Michael Todd Letsky||Method for establishing a desired area of confinement for an autonomous robot and autonomous robot implementing a control system for executing the same|
|US9072218 *||Jul 9, 2012||Jul 7, 2015||Deere & Company||Boundary sensor assembly for a robotic lawn mower, robotic lawn mower and robotic lawn mower system|
|US9357699||Jul 4, 2012||Jun 7, 2016||Husqvarna Ab||Robotic mower with secured screw-nut interface for adjustable cutting height|
|US20060059880 *||Sep 13, 2005||Mar 23, 2006||Angott Paul G||Unmanned utility vehicle|
|US20100324731 *||Jun 18, 2010||Dec 23, 2010||Michael Todd Letsky||Method for establishing a desired area of confinement for an autonomous robot and autonomous robot implementing a control system for executing the same|
|US20110030328 *||Aug 2, 2010||Feb 10, 2011||Chervon Limited||Trimmer with cutting height adjustment|
|US20110238270 *||Nov 13, 2008||Sep 29, 2011||Vitirover||Method for tending an agricultural estate|
|US20120029755 *||Jul 28, 2010||Feb 2, 2012||Johnson David A||Robotic mower area coverage system|
|US20140012418 *||Jul 9, 2012||Jan 9, 2014||Deere & Company||Boundary Sensor Assembly for a Robotic Lawn Mower, Robotic Lawn Mower and Robotic Lawn Mower System|
|US20140222197 *||Apr 22, 2014||Aug 7, 2014||RoboLabs, Inc.||System and method for monitoring operation of an autonomous robot|
|EP2241172A1 *||Apr 13, 2010||Oct 20, 2010||Fabrizio Bernini||Lawn-mower|
|EP2425701A3 *||Aug 29, 2011||Nov 28, 2012||GGP Italy S.p.A.||Autonomously operating lawnmower having a height adjustment device and method for controlling/regulating the cutting height of an autonomously driving lawnmower|
|WO2014007694A1 *||Jul 4, 2012||Jan 9, 2014||Husqvarna Ab||Calibration of cutting height for a robotic mower|
|WO2017051663A1 *||Aug 26, 2016||Mar 30, 2017||日立工機株式会社||Self-propelled grass mower|
|U.S. Classification||56/10.20A, 56/6, 56/DIG.7|
|Cooperative Classification||Y10S56/07, A01D34/74, A01D34/008|
|European Classification||A01D34/74, A01D34/00D2|
|Feb 13, 2009||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: HUSQVARNA AB, SWEDEN
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:SOLAR & ROBOTICS SA;REEL/FRAME:022248/0785
Effective date: 20081028
Owner name: SOLAR & ROBOTICS SA, BELGIUM
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:COLENS, ANDRE;REEL/FRAME:022248/0782
Effective date: 20080305
|Mar 23, 2010||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|Apr 10, 2014||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 8