|Publication number||US7121721 B2|
|Application number||US 10/481,761|
|Publication date||Oct 17, 2006|
|Filing date||Jun 18, 2002|
|Priority date||Jul 4, 2001|
|Also published as||DE10132452A1, DE10132452B4, EP1407489A2, US20040208227, WO2003005442A2, WO2003005442A3|
|Publication number||10481761, 481761, PCT/2002/2210, PCT/DE/2/002210, PCT/DE/2/02210, PCT/DE/2002/002210, PCT/DE/2002/02210, PCT/DE2/002210, PCT/DE2/02210, PCT/DE2002/002210, PCT/DE2002/02210, PCT/DE2002002210, PCT/DE200202210, PCT/DE2002210, PCT/DE202210, US 7121721 B2, US 7121721B2, US-B2-7121721, US7121721 B2, US7121721B2|
|Inventors||Henning Hauenstein, Markus Baur|
|Original Assignee||Robert Bosch Gmbh|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (10), Non-Patent Citations (2), Referenced by (1), Classifications (8), Legal Events (5)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
The present invention relates to an apparatus and a method for measuring operating temperatures of an electrical component, e.g., transient temperatures of the component during breakdown operation.
In general, in the field of semiconductor technology, the performance of a component is strongly dependent, inter alia, on the permissible operating temperatures. A very common reason for component failure is temperatures which are too high during operation, which damage or even completely destroy the component. Both for the user who dimensions a specific application, and for the semiconductor manufacturer that specifies its product, the knowledge of the component temperature that result under specific field conditions is therefore of great interest.
Thus, the problem of detecting the component temperature, particularly transient changes of temperature in the interior of the component during operation, is important.
At the moment, the following approach to solving this problem is found in the prior art. The so-called barrier-layer temperature or junction temperature Tj is determined via the measurement of the forward voltage of p-n junctions of the component. The p-n junctions are junctions between p-doped and n-doped regions of a semiconductor, and they are, for example, a component of rectifier and Zener diodes, or exist in the form of the intrinsic body diode of a field-effect transistor or MOSFET transistor.
This known approach utilizes the fact that the voltage, which must be applied in the forward direction to a p-n junction for a specific current flow, is a function of the component temperature at the location of the p-n junction. Based on the functional correlation of the voltage, of the current and the component temperature, by measuring the forward voltage with respect to a given forward current, it is possible to infer the component temperature.
In the known approach above, the fact that the measurement current must flow in the forward direction across the component turns out to be disadvantageous, i.e., this method is not usable as long as another operating state of the component prevents this forward current. Even during such operating states, however, it is often necessary to exactly determine the internal temperature conditions of the component.
For example, using this known method, it is not possible to examine the reverse breakdown of a diode, in which a high voltage is applied in the reverse direction, such that the diode breaks down and a high so-called avalanche current flows in the reverse direction. The high fields and currents lead to strong heating of the component, the hottest location in the component being precisely at the p-n junction which is breaking down. However, to determine the temperature prevailing at the p-n junction using the approach described above, it is necessary to wait until the reverse current has nearly completely decayed, in order to be able to allow a measurement current to flow in the forward direction through the component. This time delay results in an inaccurate measurement, since the temperature now present no longer corresponds to the temperature peak at the p-n junction occurring during the breakdown, because in the meantime, the heat has already been distributed over a larger area of the component or to the thermally coupled surroundings of the component.
However, it is precisely the transient temperature peaks which are critical in damaging the component and which cannot be measured sufficiently accurately using the above approach according to the prior art.
The present invention provides the advantage that the peak temperatures occurring during critical operating states and their variation with time may be exactly detected during breakdown operation of the semiconductor component.
The present invention utilizes the fact that the breakdown voltage and the breakdown current of the component are measured at a specific point of time during the breakdown operation using a measuring device, and the component temperature at this point of time is ascertained by comparing these measured values to previously recorded reference measurement data of the connection between the breakdown voltage and the breakdown current.
Therefore, the barrier-layer temperature may be measured directly during the breakdown operation, and its characteristic may be tracked on a time scale during the active component operation. The operation is not impaired by the detection of the breakdown voltage. Moreover, the transient internal component temperature is measured, which is relatively independent of external influences due to the mounting of the component.
Furthermore, the real-time data of the temperature variation of the component with time may be utilized directly for calibrating numerical model calculations. A subsequent extrapolation of temperature values measured with time delay is therefore no longer necessary.
Because the temperature measurement is more precise, developers are able to verify and optimize their theory/simulation models and calibrate certain parameters. The specification of the semiconductor products may also be safeguarded or verified by direct transient measurement data.
Finally, the application developers are able to test the load of the used components directly in the circuit during the active breakdown operation. It is thereby possible to better take advantage of the so-called safe operating range of the component for the application, since the limits of permissible thermal operating parameters are directly discernible.
In addition, the method according to the present invention may be used on packaged and unpackaged components, and it may also be used for repeating switching operations, e.g., for repetitive avalanche breakdowns, since the method itself takes up no more time than the avalanche-operation itself, i.e., there is no dead time between the individual measurements, and therefore no additional measuring time for the component.
According to one exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the component is designed as a semiconductor component capable of electrical breakdown, having at least one p-n junction. For example, the component takes the form of a transistor, e.g., a MOSFET transistor or bipolar transistor, or a diode, e.g., a Zener diode.
According to another exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the component is designed as a component capable of tunnel breakdown, having an insulating layer, e.g., a gate oxide layer, between two conductor layers.
In a further exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the electrical storage device of the apparatus takes the form of an inductor.
In another exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the switching device of the apparatus is designed as a MOSFET switch.
In a further exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the component is designed as a MOSFET transistor that is usable at the same time as a switching device.
According to a further exemplary embodiment, the measuring device for measuring the breakdown voltage and the breakdown current of the component at a specific point of time during the breakdown operation is designed as an oscilloscope.
According to another exemplary embodiment, the apparatus additionally has an evaluation unit which, from the measured voltage characteristic and current characteristic, automatically ascertains the associated barrier-layer temperature characteristic of the component.
In another exemplary embodiment, reference measurement data are recorded in a steady-state manner as a calibration curve at predetermined component temperatures, the predetermined component temperatures being suitably selected for the relevant component in such a way that during later breakdown operation, the measured value of the barrier-layer temperature may be determined with a predetermined accuracy.
In a further exemplary embodiment for the recording of reference measurement data, the component is brought homogeneously to a predetermined temperature by a heating/cooling device.
In one further exemplary embodiment, reference measurement data are recorded immediately after the electrical breakdown of the component.
In the figures, the same reference numerals denote the same or functionally equivalent components.
Apparatus 1 may be used for recording reference measurement data for obtaining calibration curves, with an additional heating/cooling device further described below. The reference measurement data are intended to represent the correlation among breakdown voltage Ud, reverse current I and component temperature T, thus also temperature Tj in the blocking-state region.
In accordance with this exemplary embodiment of the present invention, apparatus 1 according to
An inductor 3 is charged via a switching device 4, e.g. a MOSFET transistor 4, for a specific time duration to a specific charge. This is represented in
After MOSFET transistor 4 is switched off, the energy stored in inductor 3 discharges via the p-n junction of component 2 shown in
Component 2 heats up due to the Joule heat given off by the current flow. However, reverse current I decays with time, as is shown in
A homogeneous component temperature T is achieved by heating or cooling the entire component using a heating/cooling plate. However, other methods, e.g. regulating component 2 to the desired temperature using a thermoflow, are also conceivable. The heating or cooling process is carried out for a specific period of time until a homogeneous temperature distribution of component 2 has ensued in such a way that desired barrier-layer temperature Tj is present particularly in the blocking-state region at the p-n junction of component 2 to be tested.
To prevent influence of the Joule heat on the homogeneous temperature distribution in response to a flow of reverse current I during the breakdown operation of component 2, breakdown voltage Ud and breakdown current I in the reverse direction are measured immediately after the breakdown of the p-n junction, i.e. 1 to 2 μs after the breakdown, for recording the reference measurement data. The steep rise of the voltage upon commencement of the breakdown may be used as the trigger signal for this measurement, the measurement being carried out at a specific, sufficiently brief point of time after the trigger signal.
Voltage value Ud present at this point of time, given flowing reverse current I, yields a reference measuring point of calibration curve Ud (I) shown in
The measurement of the reference measurement data described above is repeated for various switch-on times of the gate voltage of MOSFET transistor 4. With increasing switch-on time, inductor 3 is charged more strongly, i.e. with a higher energy, by which current I flowing at the beginning of the breakdown may be adjusted accordingly.
By such variations of current I at the point of time of the breakdown, corresponding reference measurement data pairs (Ud, I) are obtained for each homogeneously set temperature T, thereby yielding, for example, a set of calibration curves shown in
The circuit for determining calibration curves is to be dimensioned in a manner suitable for covering the current range necessary for the calibration. In order not to load component 2 too much, the discharge duration of inductor 3 may be designed to be as short as possible, for example, by using as small an inductor 3 as possible.
In addition, depending on the component or development stage, it may be expedient to determine a separate set of calibration curves for each individual component 2, or to use a single set of calibration curves representative of a complete component generation. In the latter case, it may possibly be sufficient to merely adjust individual smaller manufacturing tolerances by suitable scaling of the present set of calibration curves. For example, breakdown voltage Ud of specific component 2 may be measured at at least one defined reference point (I, T), and the total set of calibration curves adapted to this reference point.
According to a further exemplary embodiment of the present invention, with reference to
After the reference-data measurement has concluded, the set of calibration curves shown in
Apparatus 1 according to
An oscilloscope (not shown) may be used as a measuring device for measuring breakdown voltage Ud and breakdown current I.
In breakdown operation of component 2, the measuring device measures a value pair (breakdown voltage Ud, breakdown current I), from which associated barrier-layer temperature value Tj may be ascertained using the set of calibration curves in
In the following, the method described above shall be explained in greater detail, with the aid of
As shown in
Thus, in the present exemplary embodiment, at point of time ti, for measured breakdown voltage Ud and measured breakdown current I, one obtains a temperature Tj of approximately 155° C. prevailing in component 2 in the blocking-state region, as is evident in
The method described above may be repeated at each point of time ti, by which the characteristic curve of barrier-layer temperature Tj shown in
Although the present invention was described above in light of an exemplary embodiment, the invention is not restricted to it, but can be modified in diverse ways.
For example, a suitable software algorithm may be used for an automatic evaluation of the measurement data and indication of barrier-layer temperature Tj prevailing at specific point of time ti in component 2.
The apparatus described above for plotting the set of calibration curves, as well as possible avalanche test circuits, may be integrated in a measuring apparatus which then automates the measurement-data acquisition and evaluation of the calibration curves. For example, a rapid processing unit may convert the measured values into a temperature curve online, which indicates transient barrier-layer temperature Tj to the user in quasi real time during the component operation.
Since the barrier-layer temperature can only be evaluated during the breakdown of the p-n junction of the component, i.e. as long as a finite avalanche current I is flowing in the reverse direction, the forward voltage method known in the art may be used for plotting the further progression of the barrier-layer temperature after the avalanche current has decayed. In this manner, the decay of the temperature could then, for example, be further tracked on a longer time scale. Thus, it may possibly be advantageous to combine the known forward-voltage method and the breakdown-voltage method according to the present invention.
Moreover, the present invention may be used on all components having p-n-doped semiconductor junctions, e.g., transistors, diodes, etc., as well as on components capable of tunnel breakdown. Such components capable of tunnel breakdown may, for instance, be made up of two conductor layers separated from each other by an insulating layer, e.g., a gate oxide, it being possible for a tunnel breakdown to occur at the insulated junction between the two conductive layers and the insulating layer at a specific breakdown voltage.
Metal semiconductor components (e.g., Schottky diodes) capable of breakdown are also measurable using the method of the present invention.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3942030 *||Mar 18, 1974||Mar 2, 1976||Siemens Aktiengesellschaft||Arrangement for detecting dielectric breakdowns in metal-clad high-voltage switching and transmission installations|
|US5401099||Feb 10, 1992||Mar 28, 1995||Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd.||Method of measuring junction temperature|
|US6326792 *||Sep 16, 1998||Dec 4, 2001||Matsushita Electronics Corporation||Method and apparatus for lifetime prediction of dielectric breakdown|
|US6700428 *||Dec 10, 2001||Mar 2, 2004||Infineon Technologies Ag||Circuit configuration with a controllable current limiting circuit for driving a load|
|US6953281 *||Apr 18, 2002||Oct 11, 2005||Robert Bosch Gmbh||Method for determining temperatures on semiconductor components|
|US20050104613 *||Jun 17, 2004||May 19, 2005||Charvaka Duvvury||Electrostatic discharge testers for undistorted human-body-model and machine-model characteristics|
|DE4104376A1 *||Feb 8, 1991||Aug 13, 1992||Zentralinstitut Fuer Elektrone||Measuring thermal resistance and transient heat impedance of thyristors - detecting breakdown voltage produced by regulated measuring current as temp.-dependent electrical value at gate and auxiliary cathode terminals|
|DE19652046A1||Dec 13, 1996||Jun 18, 1998||Siemens Ag||Temperature measuring method of semiconductor chip|
|JPH03186775A *||Title not available|
|JPS6321763A *||Title not available|
|1||"Design '88-Optimized Sipmos Power Transistors," Components, Siemens Aktiengesellschaft, München, Germany, Bd. 23, No. 4, Sep. 1, 1988, p. 170.|
|2||Tailliet, F. et al., "Characterization of a N-P-N Structure under ESD Stress and Proposed Electrical Model," IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, IEEE Inc. New York, US, Bd. 37, No. 4, Apr. 1, 1990, pp. 1111-1120.|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US8449173 *||May 28, 2013||Google Inc.||Method and system for thermal testing of computing system components|
|International Classification||G01K7/00, G01R31/26, G01R31/27|
|Cooperative Classification||G01R31/2603, H01L2924/0002, G01R31/275|
|Jun 1, 2004||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: ROBERT BOSCH GMBH, GERMANY
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:HAUENSTEIN, HENNING;BAUR, MARKUS;REEL/FRAME:015388/0621;SIGNING DATES FROM 20040312 TO 20040316
|Apr 8, 2010||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|May 30, 2014||REMI||Maintenance fee reminder mailed|
|Oct 17, 2014||LAPS||Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees|
|Dec 9, 2014||FP||Expired due to failure to pay maintenance fee|
Effective date: 20141017