|Publication number||US7124413 B1|
|Application number||US 09/705,577|
|Publication date||Oct 17, 2006|
|Filing date||Nov 3, 2000|
|Priority date||Nov 3, 1999|
|Publication number||09705577, 705577, US 7124413 B1, US 7124413B1, US-B1-7124413, US7124413 B1, US7124413B1|
|Inventors||Dirk M. Klemm, Richard A. Chang|
|Original Assignee||Accenture Llp|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (13), Non-Patent Citations (7), Referenced by (163), Classifications (8), Legal Events (5)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
The present application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/163,477, filed Nov. 3, 1999, which is incorporated by reference herein.
Expenditures on information technology (IT) have risen over the past twenty years to the point where they are almost always a significant amount in the capital budget of any enterprise. These enterprises include business enterprises, and may also include non-for-profit businesses, charitable institutions, religious institutions, educational establishments, governmental agencies, non-governmental organizations, and other organizations of many types.
The expenditures are not only for computers and their software, but also for making disparate computers and information technology applications and systems work together. Once systems are established, servers of several varieties may be used, as well as other software, networks, computers and peripherals. Businesses typically invest a large amount of capital in making new systems and applications work with an existing system and periodically need to upgrade components of an existing system to better serve the businesses' customers with advanced technology.
In the past, organizations have built applications on specific hardware and software technologies like networks, servers, operating systems, database, application development models and specific end user access devices. The customized infrastructure and architecture provided users with applications that did not communicate with one another. While the initial intent of the application systems were to meet a specific set of functionality, eventually these different application systems needed to be integrated. Technology today provides many different ways to integrate applications and systems.
There is a need, therefore, to construct an IT framework that provides a way of identifying and selecting a correct integration solution.
The present invention is defined by the following claims, and nothing in this section should be taken as a limitation on those claims. By way of introduction, one embodiment of the invention is an Integration Architecture Framework that allows an architect to connect existing, or legacy, system on a computer network with new or different systems on the computer network. The existing network may include useful existing content repositories, such as data repositories, and existing computer architectures.
The Integration Architecture Framework provides the architect a guide for integrating applications of the computer network and for determining how to integrate specific applications. The integration architecture framework allows the architect to identify the different types of integration options available that may help solve a specific business integration problem. Finally, the integration architecture framework aids the architect in determining what components are required to deliver the selected integration style.
These and other features and advantages of the invention will become apparent upon review of the following detailed description of the presently preferred embodiments of the invention, taken in conjunction with the appended drawings.
The present invention is illustrated by way of example and not limited in the accompanying figures.
The following table aids the reader in determining the meaning of the several acronyms used to describe the embodiments:
API=application program interface.
DLL=data link layer.
EDI=electronic data interchange.
FTP=file transfer protocol.
GIOP=General Inter-ORB Protocol.
GUI=graphical user interface.
IIOP=Internet Inter-ORB Protocol.
ISDN=integrated services digital network.
LAN=local area network.
LA/LT=Local Acknowledgment/Local Termination.
ORB=object request broker.
PDA=personal digital assistant.
TCP/IP=Transmission Control Protocol/Internet Protocol.
WAN=wide area network.
A framework for implementing components of a legacy system with disparate components or components of a new system is disclosed. The following description is presented to enable any person skilled in the art to make and use the invention. For purposes of explanation, specific nomenclature is set forth to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. Descriptions of specific applications are provided only as examples.
Referring now to the drawings,
The client 102 is a member of a class or group that uses the services of another class or group to which it is not related. In the context of a computer network, a client is a process (i.e., roughly a program, task or application) that requests a service that is provided by another process, known as a server program. The client process uses the requested service without having to know any working details about the other server program or the server itself. A server 104 is typically a remote computer system that is accessible over a communications medium such as an intranet or Internet. The client process may be active in a second computer system, and communicate with the server process over a communications medium that allows multiple clients to take advantage of the information-gathering capabilities of the server. Thus, the server essentially acts as an information provider for a computer network.
Client/server networks may include local area networks (LANs), other wide area networks (WANs), and regional networks accessed over telephone lines, such as commercial information services. The client and server processes may even comprise different programs executing simultaneously on a single computer. The client computers 102 can be conventional personal computers (PCs), workstations, or computer systems of any other size. Each client 102 typically includes one or more processors, memories, input/output devices, and a network interface, such as a conventional modem. The servers 104 can be similarly configured. However, the server 104 may each include many computers connected by a separate private network. In fact, the network 106 may include hundreds of thousands of individual networks of computers.
An architect can use the Integration Architecture Framework 200 to identify the layer at which the application systems can be integrated. The Integration Architecture Framework 200 includes a presentation integration layer 202, an application integration layer 204, an environment integration layer 206, a content integration layer 208 and a network integration layer 210. As used, the term layer does not mean that one layer must be considered or integrated before another layer can be considered or integrated. Rather, the layers can be considered or integrated in any order. One or more of the layers are typically used to integrate disparate applications and network systems.
I. Application Integration Layer 204, illustrated in
End user access implementation styles are illustrated in
Style II's architecture, generally 508, shares content among access channels 506, but utilizes unique application architecture 509 for each channel 506. Though Style II does not share as much of the architecture as Style I, Style II may be appropriate if different channels are intended to support different business processes. Also, an application may not be able to support multiple channels. For example, a custom application written for corporate LAN users, might not be able to handle Internet requests. In this case, a new web application is added to support the web access channel. However, both the custom application and web application servers may share a common database 502. An example of a Style II implementation is adding a transaction processing (TP) server to manage requests to a common database. A server for the custom application and a web server would use the TP to access shared data. However, application logic resides separately on the server for the custom application and the web server.
Style III's, generally 510, access channels 506 uses unique application logic 509 and unique data 512. Each channel 506 delivers business capabilities to end-users without sharing services with other channels 506. Optionally, content can be shared among databases through replication, file transfer, or synchronization processes. Style III does share content, however, because each channel 506 maintains its own content source. Since channels 506 use unique data 512 and application logic 509, adding a new channel 506 requires no changes to the existing channels 506.
Each channel's unique data 512 and unique applications 509 are optimized for that particular channel 506. Also, other channel requests do not impact the channel's application or database servers. Security is potentially simpler since each channel 506 can decide the security levels for that channel's users. When sharing application and data, security issues become more complex since more users have access to the applications and data, and each channel may require different levels of access to information. An example of a Style III architecture is a custom client/server application serving PCs on a LAN alongside a web server with each server including its own copy of data. Changes to the business functions may require changes to the client/server's application and data, as well as the web server's application and data.
Referring again to
Message translation services 304 translate messages from one format to another. The Message translation services 304 allow different technology message formats like CICS or ABAP to be understood by new message formats. The format of these messages may include Object Request Broker (ORB), Transaction Processing (TP), FTP, E-mail, electronic data interchange (EDI) or Data translation services 302. These services are sometimes referred to as message gateways. They provide the ability to reuse business logic within other applications without rewriting the code.
The Message translation services 304 can be divided into two categories, Message Passing and Message Queuing. Message Passing is the direct exchange of information between a sending and receiving application. Message passing is used at the time the message is sent. Message queuing is a method of sending data from one application to another in which the data is queued in computer memory. The message remains in the queue until the target program can receive the data, whether milliseconds or hours after the message arrives in the queue. Adding multiple access channels (e.g., channels 506,
Message translation services 304 include E-mail translation services. E-mail Translation Services 306 allow two different e-mail packages to communicate with one another (e.g. Lotus Notes and MS Mail). Integrating the two different e-mail packages allow users in one e-mail environment to get messages from another e-mail environment. Different strategies exist for integrating e-mail environments, such as, point-to-point gateways, message switches, client drivers, and backbones, which can be used alone or combined. A point-to-point gateway is an e-mail system add-on that provides bi-directional message-format translation and transport between two dissimilar mail systems.
A central message switch connects multiple e-mail environments via gateways in a hub-and-spoke design, where the message switch is the hub and the gateways are spokes. The chief architectural difference from the point-to-point gateway is that a gateway no longer connects two e-mail environments directly but connects each e-mail environment to the central switch. Message switches translate the sender's message format first into a central message switch format and then into the recipient's format. In contrast, gateways may translate from one vendor format directly to another. Switches communicate with mail systems using the mail system's preferred protocol, whether X.400, SMTP, or proprietary protocols used by Exchange, GroupWise or Notes.
A client driver (also called a “service provider”) is software that runs on the e-mail client (e.g., client 102,
Standards-Based Backbones can integrate disparate mail systems by linking them to servers (e.g., server 104,
Another message translation service, electronic data interchange (EDI) Translation Service 308, translates an EDI file into an interface file and vice versa. EDI integration is achieved through bridging two distinct data streams. An EDI data stream is integrated with the application data stream. In other words, transactions are created (or processed) by an application, translated into (or from) EDI and sent to (or received from) a trading partner through an automated and integrated process, preferably without human intervention.
Additionally, an Object Request Broker (ORB) Translation Service 310 defines mechanisms that support interoperation among ORBs. Thus, a client in one ORB can invoke an operation of an object in another ORB. The ORB Translation Service includes three main components. An Internet Inter-ORB Protocol (IIOP) supports interoperability in the transport domain of Transmission Control Protocol/Internet Protocol (TCP/IP). A DCE-CIOP supports interoperability among DCE-based ORBs. Finally, a General Inter-ORB Protocol (GIOP) and CORBA extensions support the construction of bridges to non-compliant ORBs and ORBs in different transport domains.
Finally, Transaction Processing (TP) Translation Services 312 allow two different Transaction Processing monitors (e.g. Tuxedo and CICS) to communicate with each other. TP Translation Services 312 allow for interoperability between different TP monitors. Integration is bi-directional and preserves the native application program interfaces (APIs) of each environment. As a result, no changes are required to either transaction processing environment. An architect should consider the impact of the additional translation steps, additional network traffic, the need to be able to manage the logical unit of work as a transaction and implications that may have on the solution.
II. Content integration layer 208 provides the ability to share data, voice, images, documents, and unstructured data between delivery vehicles. Content integration layer 208 is different from application integration 204 because Content integration layer 208 does not integrate business logic, only the content. Content integration layer 208 can be divided into content sharing 602 and content replication 604. Content sharing 602 provides the ability to share content real-time or near real-time from a source location. For example, data that is stored in one database could be accessed from a delivery vehicle in real-time. The content sharing approach is typically used when the quality of the data in the source application is high.
Content replication 604 provides the ability to share content by copying data from the source location to the other locations when required. For example, the content stored in a Lotus Notes database may be replicated to a Sybase database. Content replication 604 is typically done on a scheduled/batch type of approach, although replication can occur real-time on a transaction by transaction basis. Content replication 604 is typically used when the quality of data is not high and some conversion needs to take place between applications, although a high quality source data scenario may also replicate data to meet some performance or availability requirements.
A. Content Replication/Synchronization Services 604 support an environment in which multiple copies of the content are maintained. The need to keep multiple copies may result from the limitations of existing legacy applications and technologies or from the need to deliver better availability or recoverability of a distributed application. Replication/Synchronization can be done either real-time or on-demand, and can be initiated by a user, program or a scheduler. There are three basic replication styles depending on the amount of latency that is acceptable: synchronous real-time access for all sites (approximately no latency), asynchronous near real time access and asynchronous Batch/Periodic latency for all sites.
i. Content capture services 606 extract data that needs to be replicated/synchronized. The data capture service may either capture the change as it occurs in a change log (transaction level) or identify all of the changes in an extract program overnight (batch level). Capturing the change as it occurs typically requires a change to the source application and database. This may come in the form of using triggers in the database or having the application write to both the database and the log. Content data capture typically is used to support more real-time replication or when it is difficult to identify when a transaction was completed.
Extracting all the changes that need to be replicated in a batch typically impacts the source application and database less. Extraction is typically accomplished by writing a program to extract all the new transactions since the last replication. The extraction type of data capture is typically used to support basic interfaces in a nightly batch mode. A system architect should determine the amount of change required to the source system to implement either the extract or data capture option.
ii. Content conversion services 608 resolve inconsistencies in data with regard to syntax, definitions, and formats between the source, e.g. client, and target, e.g., server, systems. The types of conversion these services can address are divided into three basic categories, Syntactic, Structural and Semantic. Syntactic issues are surface differences, usually the result of typing or data-entry. The Syntactic part of the conversion phase cleanses the data and the other two parts deal mainly with coordinating the data as it comes in from different sources. Structural issues refer to the case where internal representation of data is inconsistent between sources. Semantic problems occur when the user's interpretation of the data may differ, or when the disagreement among source records requires human intervention to resolve.
Data Conversion tools extract data into specialized engines, apply transformation functions real time and load properly formatted data for loading into a target database. Data Conversion Engines process data mappings and transformations in memory. The Data Conversion approach increases throughput and streamlines the number of steps required to set up and revise the transformation processes. Many data conversion engines contain schedulers that coordinate all phases of the data migration process: cleansing, extraction, data movement, transformation, loading and metadata capture.
Since there are typically a variety of sources, the data interfaces are likely to originate from several platforms. Therefore, an issue to consider is upon which platform the conversion process will take place. Possibilities include one of the source platforms, the target platform, or an independent platform. The application may also be distributed across several different platforms. If a third-party tool is used, the choice may be restricted to the platforms upon which the conversion tool is designed to run. Preferably, conversion rules are stored in tables, not hard coded into the program, unless a code generator based on rules tables is used.
iii. Content Load Services 610 can be used in several places within the architecture (intermediate steps or final destination). The function of these services is to load large amounts of data from one format to another. The loading may take the form of loading data from one Oracle table to another Oracle table or it could take the form of loading data from a UNIX flat file format to an Oracle database. An architect should consider that some load services may by-pass the business rules stored within the application that may require the rules to be applied to the content before being loaded.
iv. Coordination service 612 is used to compare the information in the source and target databases to ensure that they are consistent. When discrepancies or unanticipated changes are found, the coordination service analyzes and resolves the differences. The Coordination service 612 examines records or transactions to determine content and allow the user, or systems, to change the records to eliminate inconsistencies. The coordination service is a backup for ensuring data integrity in both the source and target databases. Due to the nature of the legacy systems involved in the replication tasks, exceptions often occur that cannot be dealt with until after they are loaded into the target database.
v. Transport content 614 is typically done via messaging or file transfer solutions.
B. Content Sharing services 602 enable an application to retrieve data from a database as well as manipulate (insert, update, delete) data in a common database. Content sharing is achieved through retrieval or manipulation from the common database. For example, it allows Visual Basic/Oracle applications to access information stored in DB2 directly, without replicating. Content sharing can share content in the form of structured or unstructured data or multimedia, which includes: images, graphics, audio, non-linear video and 3D animation, analog film/video, and digital film/video.
When a business capability is delivered across multiple access channels, channel services may be required to accommodate variations in computing characteristics. The channel services may impact the application architecture, data architecture, and infrastructure of a business capability. An example of channel services is shown in
i. Multi-media Gateway Services 614 translate SQL statements by users against data types such as documents, audio, video and images. The multi-media gateway services 614 allow SQL applications to access non-traditional data formats without changing the data access method (e.g. SQL) for the application. An exemplary multi-media gateway includes Visual Information Retrieval Technology by Virage, Inc., which allows users to search collections with keywords and visual similarity and instantly access these visual assets at different resolution levels.
ii. Non-relational Database Gateway Services 616 use a relational structure to interpret relational queries submitted by users against non-relational databases and data sets, for e.g. IMS databases, VSAM data sets or Lotus Notes databases. Non-relational Database Gateway Services provide communication, data access, and data mapping facilities to access non-relational data using relational queries. An exemplary non-relational database is DataJoiner, which allows the user to access and join data from different relational data sources (including the DB2 family, Oracle, Informix, Sybase, Microsoft SQL Server) and non-relational data sources (including IMS, VSAM) with a single SQL statement.
iii. SQL Gateways 618 provide a mechanism for clients to transparently access data in a variety of databases (e.g., Oracle, Sybase, DB2), by translating SQL calls written using the format and protocols of the gateway server or primary server to the format and protocols of the target database. Since all the clients connect through a single gateway, gateways may create bottlenecks. It should also be realized that since the data is accessed over a SQL gateway using the network, there can be potential performance issues.
iv. The Web Gateway Service 620 allows developers to use the web as a new data source to automate interactions with web based services. The web gateway service 620 enables a business application to retrieve data from a data source on the Web site. The intent of the web gateway service 620 is to allow applications built using traditional Client/Server technologies to access information on the Internet without rewriting the entire application.
III. Environment Integration layer 206,
A. Component Translation Services 802 translate one component (e.g. ActiveX) to another component (e.g. Java Bean). This is different from ORB translation in that the message passed is not actually translated until in the component. The component is changed to become accessible by another component framework. For example, an ActiveX component would be wrapped to become a Java Bean. All messages could be sent based on CORBA. No DCOM messages would need to be sent. This concept is referred to as a wrapper.
B. Operating System Emulation Services 804 are tools that allow applications built on one operating system to run on another operating system. For example, by adding the emulation service a server would be able to run both an NT application and a UNIX application. There are potential drawbacks depending on which integration tool is selected. Software that uses commonly available though nonstandard libraries may require a significant amount of work to create missing application program interfaces (APIs). The architect should understand the set of APIs that are used by the application as well as provided by the emulation service.
C. Security Integration Services 806 also referred to as single sign-on services is the ability to log on to multiple computer systems or networks with a single user ID and password. The single sign-on system contrasts with the situation, where a user needs a password and user ID for each system, and the user must log on to each system separately. It can be difficult for users to manage multiple user IDs and passwords, and easier to remember just password. Single sign-on also relieves the end user of having to know log-in procedures for different platforms.
There are security issues for providing access to multiple systems via a single ID/password rather than requiring multiple IDs and passwords. First, single sign-on systems do not require that each user have a single user ID, password and log-on procedure. The single sign-on systems simply permit administrators to reduce the number of user IDs, passwords, and log-on procedures to a desired number, allowing administrators to manage the trade-off between convenience and security. Second, the system could be less secure for administrators to allow users to have many IDs/passwords rather than just one, since, when faced with remembering multiple passwords, users may compromise security and write passwords down in a non-secure place to avoid being shut out of the system. It is more secure to assign users a single, complex ID/password that they can commit to memory than to require them to memorize multiple IDs/passwords.
There are two main approaches to single sign-on, scripting 808 and centralized log-in systems 810. The two main sign-on approaches can also be combined, either within a single product or into a hybrid system 812 when products from two different vendors are combined. A centralized log-in system 810 spreads further into the network than scripting does. Centralized log-in systems 810 require a security server, server-side security software, and client-side security software. The security server runs two services, authentication and privilege. The authentication service provides a central checkpoint where prospective users prove that they really are who they claim to be, usually by providing a user ID and password. The privilege server confirms or denies rights to access particular resources based on the user's authenticated identity.
Server-side security software streamlines the log-in procedure because it handles many of the complexities involved in accessing remote systems. In UNIX, for instance, the security module on the protected system could set environment variables and terminal type and put the user in an appropriate directory. A security module on a database server could set limitations on what rows and columns the user sees. The client software in centralized log-in systems may offer some workstation security features along the lines of those offered by script-based systems. However, the workstation security features of centralized log-in systems are likely to be less rigorous and comprehensive than those of scripting systems.
In large, complex, active environments, the centralized log-in systems 810 will result in easier administration because of its centrally administered security services. Also, centralized security servers make it easy for administrators to add, change, or delete user IDs and passwords. Centralized log-in systems 810 improve enterprise-level security more than script-based systems 808. For instance, all login-related communications are usually encrypted. Encrypted systems are preferred since unencrypted log-in related communications could be intercepted by a network monitor for unauthorized later use. Key information packets are also preferably time-stamped to prevent a network monitor from picking them up, recording them and replaying them later. Architects can guard against a failing security server by setting up alternate security servers. Typically, each workstation is configured to authenticate via a given primary security server. If that server is unavailable, the workstation has the name of a secondary server to use.
Scripting 808 allows the user to log on to the single sign-on software, which then consults one or more scripts, instead of users having to perform the log-in procedures for each platform. The script(s) then perform log-in procedures on behalf of the user for all supported platforms. The script is contained in a text file that is written in a specialized programming language and is usually encrypted. Scripting 808, in contrast to centralized log-in systems 810, offers neither a centralized security service to initiate action nor software modules on the protected systems to carry the actions out reliably and securely. Scripts run at the end-user workstation and do not change the security framework beyond that. Scripts do not impact or change the access methods on protected systems (i.e., servers, hosts, networks) where sensitive data, applications, and/or communications facilities reside.
To gain the benefits of both scripting and centralized login approaches, architects may want to utilize a hybrid system 812. A hybrid single sign-on system uses a security server in conjunction with scripting. In a hybrid system, users are authenticated with a security server in order to get rights to run a script. The scripts are likely stored on the security server. Unlike centralized frameworks, the protected system contains no software.
By integrating scripts with security servers, hybrid systems 812 offer higher security and control compared to a scripting-only approach. However, hybrid systems 812 involve more administration and higher levels of network traffic. Compared to centralized frameworks 810, hybrid systems 812 are less secure. For instance, the hybrid system 812 does not prevent a perpetrator from logging on to a resource server from an unprotected workstation, and does not address the issue of unencrypted passwords traversing the network.
IV. Network integration layer 210, illustrated in
A. Foreign protocol integration 902 adapts nodes on the network, which may be a mainframe, client, or server, to support a dominant network protocol that may not be native to the node. Foreign protocol services convert the node as opposed to the protocol.
B. Protocol Translation services 904 include network layer integration 906 and data link integration 908.
i. Integration at the data link layer 908 of the OSI Model can be used to provide connectivity between systems that use different higher layer protocols. For example, LAN workstations using TCP/IP to access a UNIX server may also use SNA to access an IBM mainframe using the same network. Integration at the Data Link Layer is achieved by data link layer (DLL) protocol conversion with Local Acknowledgment/Local Termination (LA/LT).
ii. Network layer integration services 906 establish, maintain, and terminate connections across a communication facility; which can be the public switched telephone network or private data network. Network services deliver data from one end node to another through addressing and routing. Addressing provides a way to identify where a device resides on the network. Routing is the process by which paths through the network are established for the transfer of data.
V. Presentation Integration layer 202, illustrated in
A. Screen scraping 1010 is similar to terminal emulation 1020, except that the user does not actually see the original user interface such as a 3270 terminal. Screen scraping provides an application program interface (API) that allows programs to read from and write to the 3270 terminal. Screen Scraping Services transforms a character based user interface into a graphical user interface (GUI). Applications can thereby be implemented using GUI tools integrating data from unchanged legacy systems together with data from other systems. An exemplary screen scrapping 1010 application is Vission:Flashpoint, by Sterling Software which includes VISION:Develop and VISION:Play. Vission:Flashpoint is a visual application development tool designed to extend the life of existing host applications by adding a GUI.
Screen scraping 1010 allows an end user access to legacy applications. The screen scraping 1010 approach is typically used when the legacy application still delivers high quality application functionality and data to the user. Screen scraping 1010 is a relatively inexpensive approach since it allows the business to leverage older applications, while delivering new applications on newer technology. More advanced products support server side screen scraping that allows the use of 3270 terminals as message layouts, by providing indirect access to screen fields. The tools are used to map logical field names to physical fields on particular screens. Applications can then access the logical fields by name without knowing what screens they come from. The server side approach is easier to maintain in an environment where the legacy systems and screens are being modified.
An important consideration in implementing screen scraping 1010 is the quality of the business logic and data within the legacy system. Screen scraping can introduce challenges in error handling and stability. Since 3270 terminals assume that a user is using them, error messages and warnings may be difficult to catch and interpret automatically for the screen scraping program. If screens that will be modified by an end user are also accessed by screen scraping 1010, any changes to the screens must be subject to change control.
B. Terminal emulation 1020 allows applications running on one client operating system to run in another operating system to consolidate client devices. For example, a user currently using a 3270 terminal for one application and a PC for their office automation tools can run both applications on the PC. Different emulation software enables a PC or workstation to perform all or some of the functions of a 3270, 3278/3279 (color terminals), or 5250 IBM terminal (AS/400 terminal). Reverse terminal emulation software enables a 3270 terminal to appear to a network as a VTxxx (e.g., VT100 or VT200) terminal.
Gateway software performs terminal emulation 1020, which makes the PC look, feel, and act like a 3270 terminal, translation, as described above, session management which includes session establishment, maintenance, and termination. Like screen scraping 1010, the capacity of the network should be reviewed in comparison to the traffic increase expected. An exemplary terminal emulation application includes Citrix Systems Inc.'s WinFrame for Networks 1.5, a Windows NT-based system for running applications remotely over network, phone or integrated services digital network (ISDN) lines. The WinFrame system allows users to store data and run applications on a central server while sending only keystrokes, mouse movements and screen objects to the server.
While this invention has been shown and described in connection with the embodiments described, it is apparent that certain changes and modifications, in addition to those mentioned above may be made from the basic features of this invention. Accordingly, it is the intention of the applicants to protect all variations and modifications invention be defined by the following claims, including all equivalents.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US5321610||Sep 23, 1991||Jun 14, 1994||The Cobre Group, Inc.||Integrated product for implementing application software and process of developing integrated product for implementing application software|
|US5524047||Dec 27, 1993||Jun 4, 1996||Cirrus Logic, Inc.||Method and apparatus for emulating telephonic communications with a modem and headset|
|US5524253||Aug 13, 1993||Jun 4, 1996||Hewlett-Packard Company||System for integrating processing by application programs in homogeneous and heterogeneous network environments|
|US5596744 *||May 20, 1993||Jan 21, 1997||Hughes Aircraft Company||Apparatus and method for providing users with transparent integrated access to heterogeneous database management systems|
|US5797006||Jul 19, 1996||Aug 18, 1998||Bull S.A.||Application integration architecture for a data processing platform|
|US5851117||Apr 23, 1997||Dec 22, 1998||The Butcher Company||Building block training systems and training methods|
|US5991794||Jul 15, 1997||Nov 23, 1999||Microsoft Corporation||Component integration system for an application program|
|US6041362 *||Oct 20, 1995||Mar 21, 2000||Electronics Data Systems Corporation||Method and system for integrating disparate information technology applications and platforms across an enterprise|
|US6064813||Oct 29, 1997||May 16, 2000||Bull S.A.||Tool for integrating applications for a data processing platform|
|US6208345 *||Jun 8, 1998||Mar 27, 2001||Adc Telecommunications, Inc.||Visual data integration system and method|
|US6418324 *||Sep 17, 1997||Jul 9, 2002||Padcom, Incorporated||Apparatus and method for transparent wireless communication between a remote device and host system|
|US20020035577 *||Jul 6, 2001||Mar 21, 2002||Brodersen Robert A.||Partially replicated distributed database with multiple levels of remote clients|
|GB2315891A||Title not available|
|1||Borsook, P., "Seeking Security," Byte, 7 pages (May 1993).|
|2||Client/Server Programming with OS/2 2.0, XP-002164217, Chapter 1-2, 8-10 and 26 pp. 10-24, 111-123, 125-137, 149-160 and 588-594 (1992).|
|3||Orfali, R. and Harkey, D., "Client/Server with Distributed Objects," Byte, 8 pages (Apr. 1995).|
|4||Orfali, R., Harkey, D. and Edwards, J., "Intergalactic Client/Server Computing, Special Report," Byte, 7 pages (Apr. 1995).|
|5||Ryan, Hugh W., et al., "Netcentric Computing", 431 pages, CRC Press LLC (1998).|
|6||Ryan, Hugh W., et al., "Practical Guide to Client Server Computing", Second Edition, 794 pages, CRC Press LLC (1998).|
|7||Smeets, J. and Boyer, S., "Internet and client server patent information systems: new services from Derwent" Derwent Information, 4 pages (1999).|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US7421427 *||May 20, 2002||Sep 2, 2008||Attachmate Corporation||Method and apparatus for allowing host application data to be accessed via standard database access techniques|
|US7464178 *||Nov 21, 2003||Dec 9, 2008||Markport Limited||Open messaging gateway|
|US7496687 *||May 1, 2003||Feb 24, 2009||Bea Systems, Inc.||Enterprise application platform|
|US7653930||Feb 14, 2003||Jan 26, 2010||Bea Systems, Inc.||Method for role and resource policy management optimization|
|US7657015 *||Dec 28, 2005||Feb 2, 2010||At&T Corp.||Method and apparatus for processing multiple services per call|
|US7716675 *||Aug 28, 2003||May 11, 2010||Siebel Systems, Inc.||Cross-reference service|
|US7725560||Feb 28, 2003||May 25, 2010||Bea Systems Inc.||Web service-enabled portlet wizard|
|US7739670 *||Sep 16, 2004||Jun 15, 2010||Sap Ag||System and method for transforming information between data formats|
|US7752205||Aug 4, 2006||Jul 6, 2010||Bea Systems, Inc.||Method and system for interacting with a virtual content repository|
|US7761406||Mar 16, 2005||Jul 20, 2010||International Business Machines Corporation||Regenerating data integration functions for transfer from a data integration platform|
|US7774601||Apr 6, 2004||Aug 10, 2010||Bea Systems, Inc.||Method for delegated administration|
|US7783670||Jan 26, 2006||Aug 24, 2010||Bea Systems, Inc.||Client server conversion for representing hierarchical data structures|
|US7814142||Feb 24, 2005||Oct 12, 2010||International Business Machines Corporation||User interface service for a services oriented architecture in a data integration platform|
|US7814470||Feb 24, 2005||Oct 12, 2010||International Business Machines Corporation||Multiple service bindings for a real time data integration service|
|US7818344||May 22, 2006||Oct 19, 2010||Bea Systems, Inc.||System and method for providing nested types for content management|
|US7836131||Oct 25, 2002||Nov 16, 2010||Sierra Wireless, Inc.||Redirection of notifications to a wireless user device|
|US7836138 *||Oct 25, 2007||Nov 16, 2010||Sierra Wireless, Inc.||Redirection of notifications to a wireless user device|
|US7840614||Jul 11, 2003||Nov 23, 2010||Bea Systems, Inc.||Virtual content repository application program interface|
|US7861289||Jun 19, 2007||Dec 28, 2010||Oracle International Corporation||Pagelets in adaptive tags in non-portal reverse proxy|
|US7861290||Jun 19, 2007||Dec 28, 2010||Oracle International Corporation||Non-invasive insertion of pagelets|
|US7865943||Jun 19, 2007||Jan 4, 2011||Oracle International Corporation||Credential vault encryption|
|US7886352||Jun 19, 2007||Feb 8, 2011||Oracle International Corporation||Interstitial pages|
|US7904953||Jun 19, 2007||Mar 8, 2011||Bea Systems, Inc.||Pagelets|
|US7917537||May 22, 2006||Mar 29, 2011||Oracle International Corporation||System and method for providing link property types for content management|
|US7949992 *||Jun 27, 2006||May 24, 2011||International Business Machines Corporation||Development of information technology system|
|US7950999 *||Sep 16, 2004||May 31, 2011||Bally Gaming, Inc.||User interface system and method for a gaming machine|
|US7953734||May 16, 2006||May 31, 2011||Oracle International Corporation||System and method for providing SPI extensions for content management system|
|US7958198||Oct 14, 2010||Jun 7, 2011||Sierra Wireless, Inc.||Redirection of notifications to a wireless user device|
|US7971187 *||Apr 24, 2006||Jun 28, 2011||Microsoft Corporation||Configurable software stack|
|US7992189||Aug 5, 2009||Aug 2, 2011||Oracle International Corporation||System and method for hierarchical role-based entitlements|
|US8041760||Feb 24, 2005||Oct 18, 2011||International Business Machines Corporation||Service oriented architecture for a loading function in a data integration platform|
|US8060553||Feb 24, 2005||Nov 15, 2011||International Business Machines Corporation||Service oriented architecture for a transformation function in a data integration platform|
|US8099425 *||Feb 24, 2004||Jan 17, 2012||Computer Associates Think, Inc.||Relational model for management information in network devices|
|US8099779||Aug 29, 2008||Jan 17, 2012||Oracle International Corporation||Federated management of content repositories|
|US8121274||Nov 17, 2009||Feb 21, 2012||At&T Intellectual Property Ii, L.P.||Method and apparatus for processing multiple services per call|
|US8136150||Nov 2, 2010||Mar 13, 2012||Oracle International Corporation||User role mapping in web applications|
|US8166448||May 25, 2007||Apr 24, 2012||Microsoft Corporation||Rapid development of distributed web service|
|US8195606||Dec 12, 2008||Jun 5, 2012||Microsoft Corporation||Batch data synchronization with foreign key constraints|
|US8307109||Aug 24, 2004||Nov 6, 2012||International Business Machines Corporation||Methods and systems for real time integration services|
|US8316025||Apr 8, 2011||Nov 20, 2012||Oracle International Corporation||System and method for providing SPI extensions for content management system|
|US8364625||Oct 9, 2008||Jan 29, 2013||The Pnc Financial Services Group, Inc.||Mainframe-based business rules engine construction tool|
|US8370281||Oct 9, 2008||Feb 5, 2013||The Pnc Financial Services Group, Inc.||Self-modification of a mainframe-based business rules engine construction tool|
|US8397283||Feb 1, 2012||Mar 12, 2013||Oracle International Corporation||User role mapping in web applications|
|US8458646 *||Jun 25, 2009||Jun 4, 2013||Qwest Communications International Inc.||System development planning tool|
|US8458651||Jun 18, 2010||Jun 4, 2013||International Business Machines Corporation||Seamless migration of tuxedo® applications to a CICS® hosting environment|
|US8463852||Oct 6, 2006||Jun 11, 2013||Oracle International Corporation||Groupware portlets for integrating a portal with groupware systems|
|US8479175||Jan 15, 2010||Jul 2, 2013||The Pnc Financial Services Group, Inc.||Mainframe-based web service development accelerator|
|US8510707||Jan 15, 2010||Aug 13, 2013||The Pnc Financial Services Group, Inc.||Mainframe-based web service development accelerator|
|US8517819||Dec 16, 2011||Aug 27, 2013||Bally Gaming, Inc.||System gaming|
|US8529349||Nov 12, 2008||Sep 10, 2013||Bally Gaming, Inc.||Networked gaming system communication protocols and methods|
|US8535158||Nov 12, 2008||Sep 17, 2013||Bally Gaming, Inc.||Networked gaming system communication protocols and methods|
|US8555239||Jan 15, 2010||Oct 8, 2013||The Pnc Financial Services Group, Inc.||Mainframe-based web service development accelerator|
|US8561088||Apr 8, 2008||Oct 15, 2013||Microsoft Corporation||Registering network applications with an API framework|
|US8568218||Nov 15, 2011||Oct 29, 2013||Bally Gaming, Inc.||System gaming|
|US8621445 *||Dec 6, 2010||Dec 31, 2013||Visualon, Inc.||Wrapper for porting a media framework and components to operate with another media framework|
|US8622801||Dec 16, 2011||Jan 7, 2014||Bally Gaming, Inc.||System gaming|
|US8622806||Jun 10, 2011||Jan 7, 2014||Bally Gaming, Inc.||System gaming|
|US8636574||Jul 27, 2011||Jan 28, 2014||Bally Gaming, Inc.||System gaming|
|US8647188||Jun 10, 2011||Feb 11, 2014||Bryan M. Kelly||System gaming|
|US8657664||Jun 10, 2011||Feb 25, 2014||Bally Gaming, Inc.||System gaming|
|US8660675||Jan 6, 2012||Feb 25, 2014||Bally Gaming, Inc.||System gaming|
|US8662989||Jun 10, 2011||Mar 4, 2014||Bally Gaming, Inc.||System gaming|
|US8678901||Sep 6, 2006||Mar 25, 2014||Bally Gaming||System gaming|
|US8678902||Sep 6, 2006||Mar 25, 2014||Bally Gaming, Inc.||System gaming|
|US8700739||Mar 10, 2008||Apr 15, 2014||Sandisk Technologies Inc.||Device for automatically receiving new digital content from a network|
|US8708816||Jun 10, 2011||Apr 29, 2014||Bally Gaming, Inc.||System gaming|
|US8725122||May 13, 2009||May 13, 2014||First Data Corporation||Systems and methods for providing trusted service management services|
|US8777750||Jul 27, 2011||Jul 15, 2014||Bally Gaming, Inc.||System gaming|
|US8787360||Feb 20, 2012||Jul 22, 2014||At&T Intellectual Property Ii, L.P.||Method and apparatus for processing multiple services per call|
|US8831966||Feb 14, 2003||Sep 9, 2014||Oracle International Corporation||Method for delegated administration|
|US8840462||Apr 30, 2008||Sep 23, 2014||Bally Gaming, Inc.||Tournament bonus awards and related methods|
|US8944918||Jun 10, 2011||Feb 3, 2015||Bryan M. Kelly||System gaming|
|US8961317||Nov 15, 2011||Feb 24, 2015||Bally Gaming, Inc.||System gaming|
|US8968095||Jun 10, 2011||Mar 3, 2015||Bally Gaming, Inc.||System gaming|
|US8986121||Nov 12, 2008||Mar 24, 2015||Bally Gaming, Inc.||Networked gaming system communication protocols and methods|
|US8986122||Nov 12, 2008||Mar 24, 2015||Bally Gaming, Inc.||Networked gaming system communication protocols and methods|
|US8992326||Nov 12, 2008||Mar 31, 2015||Bally Gaming, Inc.||Networked gaming system communication protocols and methods|
|US8998727||Aug 20, 2013||Apr 7, 2015||Bally Gaming, Inc.||System gaming|
|US9022866||May 3, 2006||May 5, 2015||Bally Gaming, Inc.||User interface system and system-controlled bonus system|
|US9026033||Feb 13, 2012||May 5, 2015||Sandisk Technologies Inc.||Audio visual player apparatus and system and method of content distribution using the same|
|US9053610||Nov 12, 2008||Jun 9, 2015||Bally Gaming, Inc.||Networked gaming system communication protocols and methods|
|US9081781||Aug 22, 2011||Jul 14, 2015||Sandisk Technologies Inc.||Wireless portable device for creating and wirelessly transmitting digital audio and/or video|
|US9082260||Nov 12, 2008||Jul 14, 2015||Bally Gaming, Inc.||Networked gaming system communication protocols and methods|
|US9092519||Jun 28, 2010||Jul 28, 2015||Sandisk Technologies Inc.||Method and system for updating a list of content stored on a user-operated device|
|US9105148||Jan 8, 2014||Aug 11, 2015||Bally Gaming, Inc.||System gaming|
|US9116705||Oct 9, 2008||Aug 25, 2015||The Pnc Financial Services Group, Inc.||Mainframe-based browser|
|US9117342||Nov 12, 2008||Aug 25, 2015||Bally Gaming, Inc.||Networked gaming system communication protocols and methods|
|US9141628||Sep 1, 2009||Sep 22, 2015||Cloudlock, Inc.||Relationship model for modeling relationships between equivalent objects accessible over a network|
|US9177021 *||Jun 9, 2011||Nov 3, 2015||International Business Machines Corporation||Relational query planning for non-relational data sources|
|US9214057||Jan 6, 2014||Dec 15, 2015||Bally Gaming, Inc.||System gaming|
|US9214058||May 15, 2014||Dec 15, 2015||Bally Gaming, Inc.||System gaming|
|US9218707||Jan 17, 2014||Dec 22, 2015||Bally Gaming, Inc.||System gaming|
|US9235955||Jul 10, 2006||Jan 12, 2016||Bally Gaming, Inc.||Universal game monitoring unit and system|
|US9317994||Sep 9, 2013||Apr 19, 2016||Bally Gaming, Inc.||Networked gaming system communication protocols and methods|
|US9354904 *||Apr 24, 2006||May 31, 2016||Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc||Applying packages to configure software stacks|
|US9466170||Oct 28, 2013||Oct 11, 2016||Bally Gaming, Inc.||Networked gaming system communication protocols and methods|
|US9531817 *||Dec 19, 2005||Dec 27, 2016||Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ)||Technique for providing interoperability between different protocol domains|
|US9558239 *||Jul 16, 2012||Jan 31, 2017||International Business Machines Corporation||Relational query planning for non-relational data sources|
|US20030078916 *||May 20, 2002||Apr 24, 2003||Deforeest Chris||Method and apparatus for allowing host application data to be accessed via standard database access techniques|
|US20040010598 *||Feb 28, 2003||Jan 15, 2004||Bea Systems, Inc.||Portal setup wizard|
|US20040068568 *||May 1, 2003||Apr 8, 2004||Griffin Philip B.||Enterprise application platform|
|US20040083271 *||Oct 25, 2002||Apr 29, 2004||Sierra Wireless, Inc., A Canadian Corporation||Redirection of notifications to a wireless user device|
|US20040148357 *||Nov 21, 2003||Jul 29, 2004||Louis Corrigan||Open messaging gateway|
|US20040181541 *||Feb 24, 2004||Sep 16, 2004||Computer Associates Think, Inc.||Relational model for management information in network devices|
|US20050081062 *||Oct 8, 2004||Apr 14, 2005||Bea Systems, Inc.||Distributed enterprise security system|
|US20050222931 *||Feb 24, 2005||Oct 6, 2005||Ascential Software Corporation||Real time data integration services for financial information data integration|
|US20050223109 *||Feb 24, 2005||Oct 6, 2005||Ascential Software Corporation||Data integration through a services oriented architecture|
|US20050234969 *||Feb 24, 2005||Oct 20, 2005||Ascential Software Corporation||Services oriented architecture for handling metadata in a data integration platform|
|US20050235274 *||Feb 24, 2005||Oct 20, 2005||Ascential Software Corporation||Real time data integration for inventory management|
|US20050240354 *||Feb 24, 2005||Oct 27, 2005||Ascential Software Corporation||Service oriented architecture for an extract function in a data integration platform|
|US20050240592 *||Feb 24, 2005||Oct 27, 2005||Ascential Software Corporation||Real time data integration for supply chain management|
|US20050251533 *||Mar 16, 2005||Nov 10, 2005||Ascential Software Corporation||Migrating data integration processes through use of externalized metadata representations|
|US20050256899 *||Nov 18, 2004||Nov 17, 2005||Bea Systems, Inc.||System and method for representing hierarchical data structures|
|US20050256906 *||May 13, 2005||Nov 17, 2005||Bea Systems, Inc.||Interface for portal and webserver administration-efficient updates|
|US20050257154 *||May 13, 2005||Nov 17, 2005||Bea Systems, Inc.||Graphical association of elements for portal and webserver administration|
|US20050257172 *||May 13, 2005||Nov 17, 2005||Bea Systems, Inc.||Interface for filtering for portal and webserver administration|
|US20050262188 *||Feb 24, 2005||Nov 24, 2005||Ascential Software Corporation||Multiple service bindings for a real time data integration service|
|US20050262189 *||Feb 24, 2005||Nov 24, 2005||Ascential Software Corporation||Server-side application programming interface for a real time data integration service|
|US20050262194 *||Feb 24, 2005||Nov 24, 2005||Ascential Software Corporation||User interface service for a services oriented architecture in a data integration platform|
|US20060010195 *||Feb 24, 2005||Jan 12, 2006||Ascential Software Corporation||Service oriented architecture for a message broker in a data integration platform|
|US20060059115 *||Sep 16, 2004||Mar 16, 2006||Gutfleisch Michael R||System and method for transforming information between data formats|
|US20060068906 *||Sep 16, 2004||Mar 30, 2006||James Morrow||User interface system and method for a gaming machine|
|US20060069717 *||Feb 24, 2005||Mar 30, 2006||Ascential Software Corporation||Security service for a services oriented architecture in a data integration platform|
|US20060080641 *||Jul 8, 2005||Apr 13, 2006||Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.||Inferring data type in a multi stage process|
|US20060123026 *||Jan 26, 2006||Jun 8, 2006||Bea Systems, Inc.||Client server conversion for representing hierarchical data structures|
|US20070209041 *||Aug 28, 2003||Sep 6, 2007||Exley Richard M||Cross-reference service|
|US20070214271 *||May 15, 2007||Sep 13, 2007||Bea Systems, Inc.||Enterprise application platform|
|US20070250813 *||Apr 24, 2006||Oct 25, 2007||Microsoft Corporation||Configurable Software Stack|
|US20070261017 *||Apr 24, 2006||Nov 8, 2007||Microsoft Corporation||Applying Packages To Configure Software Stacks|
|US20070300204 *||Jun 27, 2006||Dec 27, 2007||International Business Machines Corporation||Development of information technology system|
|US20080077809 *||Jun 19, 2007||Mar 27, 2008||Bea Systems, Inc.||Credential Vault Encryption|
|US20080077980 *||Jun 19, 2007||Mar 27, 2008||Bea Systems, Inc.||Pagelets|
|US20080077981 *||Jun 19, 2007||Mar 27, 2008||Bea Systems, Inc.||Pagelets in adaptive tags in non-portal reverse proxy|
|US20080077982 *||Jun 19, 2007||Mar 27, 2008||Bea Systems, Inc.||Credential vault encryption|
|US20080077983 *||Jun 19, 2007||Mar 27, 2008||Bea Systems, Inc.||Non-invasive insertion of pagelets|
|US20080109538 *||Oct 25, 2007||May 8, 2008||Sierra Wireless, Inc., A Canadian Corporation||Redirection of notifications to a wireless user device|
|US20080182510 *||Dec 27, 2007||Jul 31, 2008||Musicgremlin, Inc.||Audio visual player apparatus and system and method of content distribution using the same|
|US20080250388 *||Jun 19, 2007||Oct 9, 2008||Bea Systems, Inc.||Pagelets in adaptive tags|
|US20080295064 *||May 25, 2007||Nov 27, 2008||Microsoft Corporation||Rapid development of distributed web service|
|US20080313728 *||Jun 19, 2007||Dec 18, 2008||Bea Systems, Inc.||Interstitial pages|
|US20090082099 *||May 3, 2006||Mar 26, 2009||Bally Gaming International, Inc.||User Interface System and System-Controlled Bonus System|
|US20090093237 *||Dec 19, 2005||Apr 9, 2009||Roman Levenshteyn||Technique for providing interoperability between different protocol domains|
|US20090099981 *||Oct 9, 2008||Apr 16, 2009||The Pnc Financial Services Group, Inc.||Mainframe-based business rules engine construction tool|
|US20090099982 *||Oct 9, 2008||Apr 16, 2009||The Pnc Financial Services Group, Inc.||Self-modification of a mainframe-based business rules engine construction tool|
|US20090100344 *||Oct 9, 2008||Apr 16, 2009||The Pnc Financial Services Group, Inc.||Mainframe-based browser|
|US20090100402 *||Oct 9, 2008||Apr 16, 2009||The Pnc Financial Services Group, Inc.||Configuring and constructing applications in a mainframe-based computing environment|
|US20090254670 *||Apr 8, 2008||Oct 8, 2009||Microsoft Corporation||Providing access to network applications for standardized clients|
|US20090254926 *||Apr 8, 2008||Oct 8, 2009||Microsoft Corporation||Registering network applications with an api framework|
|US20090259985 *||Jun 25, 2009||Oct 15, 2009||Qwest Communications International Inc.||System development planning tool|
|US20100024330 *||Aug 29, 2008||Feb 4, 2010||Sodaro Donald E||Multi-unit dwelling system and building|
|US20100030590 *||Aug 29, 2008||Feb 4, 2010||Sodaro Donald E||Centralized multi-property management system|
|US20100061277 *||Nov 17, 2009||Mar 11, 2010||Brown John C||Method and apparatus for processing multiple services per call|
|US20100153423 *||Dec 12, 2008||Jun 17, 2010||Microsoft Corporation||Batch data synchronization with foreign key constraints|
|US20100192335 *||Jan 13, 2010||Aug 5, 2010||Daiwa Kasei Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha||Cushion clip|
|US20100223242 *||May 13, 2010||Sep 2, 2010||Simdesk Technologies||File Operations with Multiple Level File Locking Techniques|
|US20100291904 *||May 13, 2009||Nov 18, 2010||First Data Corporation||Systems and methods for providing trusted service management services|
|US20110029630 *||Oct 14, 2010||Feb 3, 2011||Sierra Wireless, Inc.||Redirection of notifications to a wireless user device|
|US20110047611 *||Nov 2, 2010||Feb 24, 2011||Bea Systems, Inc.||User Role Mapping in Web Applications|
|US20110230260 *||Jul 10, 2006||Sep 22, 2011||Morrow James W||Universal Game Monitoring Unit and System|
|US20120131645 *||Nov 18, 2010||May 24, 2012||Harm Michael W||User Scriptable Server Initiated User Interface Creation|
|US20120139923 *||Dec 6, 2010||Jun 7, 2012||Visualon, Inc.||Wrapper for porting a media framework and components to operate with another media framework|
|US20120317096 *||Jun 9, 2011||Dec 13, 2012||International Business Machines Corporation||Relational Query Planning for Non-Relational Data Sources|
|US20130006966 *||Jul 16, 2012||Jan 3, 2013||International Business Machines Corporation||Relational Query Planning for Non-Relational Data Sources|
|U.S. Classification||719/313, 717/101|
|International Classification||G06F9/44, G06F3/00, G06F13/00, G06F9/46|
|Apr 9, 2001||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: ACCENTURE, LLP, CALIFORNIA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:KLEMM, DIRK M.;CHANG, RICHARD A.;REEL/FRAME:011674/0162;SIGNING DATES FROM 20010223 TO 20010321
|Apr 19, 2010||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|Sep 8, 2010||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: ACCENTURE GLOBAL SERVICES GMBH, SWITZERLAND
Effective date: 20100831
Free format text: CONFIRMATORY ASSIGNMENT;ASSIGNOR:ACCENTURE LLP;REEL/FRAME:024946/0971
|Jan 26, 2011||AS||Assignment|
Effective date: 20100901
Owner name: ACCENTURE GLOBAL SERVICES LIMITED, IRELAND
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:ACCENTURE GLOBAL SERVICES GMBH;REEL/FRAME:025700/0287
|Mar 19, 2014||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 8