|Publication number||US7135060 B2|
|Application number||US 10/723,980|
|Publication date||Nov 14, 2006|
|Filing date||Nov 26, 2003|
|Priority date||Oct 10, 2001|
|Also published as||CA2370540A1, CA2370540C, CA2650784A1, CA2650784C, US6692553, US7785408, US20030075048, US20040107837, US20060185520, US20080229930|
|Publication number||10723980, 723980, US 7135060 B2, US 7135060B2, US-B2-7135060, US7135060 B2, US7135060B2|
|Inventors||John L. Jordan, Sr., John L. Jordan, Jr.|
|Original Assignee||Enviromental Monitoring Systems, Inc.|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (21), Non-Patent Citations (1), Referenced by (10), Classifications (9), Legal Events (4)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
This application is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/974,682, filed Oct. 10, 2001, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,692,553, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
The present invention relates generally to an apparatus and method for collecting particles suspended in a gas and, more particularly, to a sampling apparatus and method for collecting particulate matter for counting and analysis.
The detection of airborne particulate matter, including fibers, pollen, mold and fungal spores, insect parts, flora and other bioaerosols, and the like, is a continuing and expanding area of development for minimizing health risks to populations. Environmental professionals need to determine the presence and quantity of deleterious particles, such as asbestos fibers, in the air. Aerobiologists and allergists need to identify and quantify airborne pollen and mold spore concentrations for patient diagnosis. Epidemiologists are concerned with particles carrying bacteria, such as that responsible for Legionnaires Disease in air conditioning systems. Moreover, federal and industrial standards have been established for allowable concentrations of particular matter in the atmosphere of various environments. As a result, it is necessary to regularly test some environments to determine the concentration of particles in the atmosphere for maintaining a particular standard or self-regulating quality control.
Devices for sampling airborne particulate matter generally include a housing having inlet and outlet openings, a pump for drawing a gas flow through the housing, and a separator within the housing for collecting particles from the sampled gas. In a conventional sampling device, referred to as an “impactor”, the separator is a flat “impaction plate”, usually a microscope slide. In use, a flow of sampled gas comprising, for example, air and particles carried by the air, is drawn through the impactor. The flow is directed through the inlet opening in the housing and toward the impaction plate. The stream of gas is diffused radially outwardly at the impaction plate surface and flows around the impaction plate. Particles in the gas stream larger than a certain size have high enough inertia to cross streamlines and impinge upon the impaction plate and are separated from the gas stream. Since the particles tend to bounce when they hit the impaction plate, the impaction plate surface is coated with an adhesive. Smaller particles remain in the gas stream and pass out of the housing through the outlet opening. Upon completion of sampling, the impaction plate is manually removed from the impactor for microscopic inspection, weighing or chemical analysis of the collected particles.
Collection efficiency of an impactor is a measure of the percent of particles which are collected on the impaction plate as a function of the particle size. The collection efficiency is usually reported as the smallest particle collected at 50% efficiency. This is known within the art as the 50% cut-off size (d50). The size range of the particles collected on the impaction plate, and the d50, is a function of the diameter of the inlet opening and the distance of the impaction plate from the opening, which is referred to as the jet-to-plate distance. These parameters are reported as a dimensionless ratio, S/W, where S is the jet-to-plate distance and W is the diameter of the inlet opening of the impactor. The 50% cut-off size is dependent upon S/W. Generally, as S/W decreases, the impactor's collection efficiency of smaller particles increases.
Collection of smaller airborne particulate such as mold and fungal spores and other bioaerosols has recently become a priority. Efficient mold and fungal spore collection requires a sampling device with a d50 of less than about 2 μm. To achieve this collection efficiency, the tendency is to reduce the S/W of the impactor. In practice, however, when S/W is less than one, conventional impactor performance becomes unpredictable yielding inconsistent results. Thus, it has been suggested that the minimum jet-to-plate distance for an impactor should provide an S/W equal to one or greater. In this configuration, small variations in jet-to-plate distance will not effect the value of d50. Unfortunately, impactors designed and operated according to these accepted parameters cannot efficiently collect particles below about 2.5 μm. and thus are inadequate for smaller particulate collection.
Another important characteristic of impactors is the gas sampling flow rate. The flow rate through the impactor must be calibrated prior to sampling in order to accurately calculate the sampling results. With conventional impactors, the flow rate through the pump is typically calibrated using a rotameter upstream of the pump. However, because the pump is spatially removed from the actual particle collection site at the impaction plate, the calibrated flow rate at the pump may not be the same as the flow rate at the point of impaction. This can lead to inaccurate sampling results.
For the foregoing reasons, there is a need for a particle collection apparatus and method for the collection of airborne particulate below about 2.5 μm. The new apparatus should be designed for sampling airborne particles in various environments and applications, including environmental air quality, industrial and occupational monitoring. The new apparatus should also allow for accurate calibration of the gas sampling flow rate at the point of impaction.
According to the present invention, an apparatus and system is provided for collecting particles entrained in a gas from a source of gas and particles. The apparatus and system comprise a housing defining an enclosed chamber. The housing has an inlet opening providing fluid communication between the source of gas and particles and the chamber, and an outlet opening providing fluid communication between the chamber and the exterior of the housing. The outlet opening is connected to a fluid flow producing means for drawing gas and particles through the housing from the inlet opening to the outlet opening. A collecting member having an adhesive on at least a portion of the surface is disposed in the chamber between the inlet opening and the outlet opening. The adhesive surface of the collecting member is positioned adjacent to the inlet opening so that the ratio of the distance between the inlet opening and the collecting member surface to the diameter of the inlet opening is less than about 1. When gas and particles are drawn from the source through the housing, the inlet opening directs a stream of gas and particles at the surface of the collecting member. Particles carried in the stream having an aerodynamic equivalent diameter of less than about 2.5 μm are captured on the collecting member.
Also according to the present invention, a method is provided for collecting particles having an aerodynamic equivalent diameter of less than about 2.5 μm. The method comprises the steps of providing a housing defining an enclosed chamber. The housing has an inlet opening providing fluid communication between a source of gas and particles and the chamber, and an outlet opening providing fluid communication between the chamber and the exterior of the housing. The outlet opening is connected to a fluid flow producing means for drawing gas and particles through the housing from the inlet opening to the outlet opening. A collecting member is provided and at least a portion of the upper surface of the collecting member is coated with an adhesive. The collecting member is positioned in the chamber between the inlet opening and the outlet opening so that the ratio of the distance between the inlet opening and the surface of the collecting member to the diameter of the inlet opening is less than about 1. Gas and particles are drawn from the source and through the housing so that the inlet opening directs the gas and particles at the surface of the collecting member for capturing the particles on the surface of the collecting member.
For a more complete understanding of the present invention, reference should now be had to the embodiments shown in the accompanying drawings and described below. In the drawings:
Certain terminology is used herein for convenience only and is not to be taken as a limitation on the invention. For example, words such as “upper,” “lower,” “left,” “right,” “horizontal,” “vertical,” “upward,” and “downward” merely describe the configuration shown in the FIGs. Indeed, the components may be oriented in any direction and the terminology, therefore, should be understood as encompassing such variations unless specified otherwise.
Referring now to the drawings, wherein like reference numerals designate corresponding or similar elements throughout the several views, an embodiment of a particle sampling apparatus according to the present invention is shown in
The cylindrical shape of the housing 12 is preferred for convenience and ease in manufacture and use, although any other exterior shape may be used if desired. The housing 12 is preferably made of aluminum, but may be formed from any suitable material such as, for example, thermoplastics. The housing 12 can be formed by machining, stamping, injection molding, and the like.
Referring now to
An impaction plate 42 is seen in
The top member 14 of the housing 12 has an internally-threaded downwardly depending peripheral flange 48. A length of the outer peripheral surface of the base member 16 is externally threaded for receiving the top member 14. When the housing 12 is assembled (
As seen in
In operation, the vacuum pump operates to draw gas and particulate matter through the housing 12. The flow of gas and particles is indicated by the arrows in
According to the present invention, the particle collection apparatus 10 preferably collects particles having a diameter less than about 2.5 μm. In order to achieve these results, the ratio of the jet-to-plate distance, S (
In one embodiment of the present invention, the user may select from among several different top portions 14 each with the same inlet opening 28 diameter but differing recess 47 depths. Thus, the user may selectively determine the jet-to-plate distance by utilizing a top portion 14 with the appropriate recess 47 depth. By selection of a top portion 14 with a known recess 47 depth, the user can configure an impactor having a known S/W for selecting the size of the particles collected by the apparatus 10. For collecting particles having a diameter less than about 2.5 μm, the perferred jet-to-plate distance is less than about 0.08 inches, and the more preferred jet-to-late distance is about 0.02 inches or less. Thus, as an example, for an S/W of about 1, an inlet opening diameter of about 0.02 inches is required. An S/W of 0.1 or less would require an inlet opening diameter of about 0.2 inches or less.
Further in accordance with the present invention,
In one embodiment, the cap 66 is used to calibrate the gas flow rate through the particle collection apparatus 10 prior to use. In this application, the fitting 70 on the cap 66 is connected to a metering device, not shown, by means of a flexible tube 80. Note that the impaction plate 42 does not have an adhesive surface in this function. The pump is operated for drawing gas through the housing 12 including the cap 66 (
In another embodiment, a tubular wand 82 (
The particle collection apparatus 10 and method of the present invention is capable of effective, repeatable collection of particulate matter smaller than collected by conventional impactors. Moreover, the apparatus 10 may be used under a variety of conditions, in any desired location including confined areas such as ventilation ducts, and in any orientation. Since the tube 28 connected between the outlet port 24 and the pump may be any length, the pump may be placed at any selected location remote from the sampling site. Where great variation in tube 28 lengths is anticipated, a variable speed vacuum pump can be used so that gas flow losses due to friction and very long tubes can be accommodated providing substantially uniform air flow through the system 10.
The particle collection efficiency of several embodiments of the apparatus of the present invention 10 was demonstrated using a test system schematically shown in
Using the particle size distribution data measured upstream and downstream of the sampling apparatus 10, the overall particle collection efficiency, EC, was determined as follows:
This efficiency is equal to the actual physical collection efficiency of the apparatus 10 if the internal losses are negligible. During each test sequence, the measurement of particle concentrations CDOWN and CUP was repeated three times for each specific configuration of the apparatus 10. Using these data the average value of the collection efficiency and the standard deviation were calculated. A new glass microscope slide was installed as the impaction plate for each test run.
Three different configurations of the apparatus of the present invention 10 were tested. The diameter of the inlet opening for all four configurations was 0.182″. The jet-to-plate distance was varied resulting in an S/W for each configuration of 0.033 (
Particle Collection Efficiency (d50)
Oleic acid particles
The collection of PSL particles was less efficient than collection of oleic acid particles of the same size, which may be attributed a “bounce effect” of the PSL particles. Oleic acid particles are very sticky and adhere well to the adhesive surface of the impaction plate 42. The PSL particles do not adhere well to the impaction plate 42 and may be re-aerosolized even after they are impacted, thereby contributing to the downstream particle count. Moreover, larger PSL particles impact with force sufficient to “splash” the coating of the surface rendering the plate surface less sticky for subsequent incoming particles. This effect may be more pronounced for higher particle concentrations.
All configurations achieved a particle collection efficiency below 2.5 μm when collecting oleic acid particles and PSL particles. This overall collection efficiency is sufficiently high to anticipate that airborne fungi will also be collected efficiently, subject to particle bounce effect and internal losses. Accordingly, the experimental system was modified to determine the spore collection efficiency of the apparatus 10 with two species of fungal spores, Cladosporium cladosporiodes (dae=1.8 um) and Asperigillus versicolor (dae=2.5 um). These microorganisms commonly occur in indoor and outdoor environments in various climate zones worldwide. Prior to the experiments, C. cladosporioides and A. versicolor were cultured in dispersion tubes containing malt extract agar (MEA), and were then incubated at 25° C. for 7 days. The dispersion tubes were inserted into an agar-tube disperser for dry spore generation, as previously described by Reponen, T., K. Willeke, V. Ulevicius, A. Reponen, S. A. Grinshpun, and J. Donnelly, Techniques for Dispersion of Microorganisms Into Air, Aerosol Science and Technology, 27:405–421 (1997). The Collison nebulizer was replaced with a bioaerosol generator 54 which generated fungal spores from the agar-tube dispersers by passing HEPA-filtered air through the disperser. The fungal spores were not charge neutralized. The upstream and downstream aerosol concentrations were measured using an optical particle counter from Grimm Technologies, Inc. (Model 1.108), of Douglasville, Ga., operated at a flow rate of 1.21 Lpm.
Equation (1) was used to calculate the efficiency of the apparatus. This efficiency represented the fraction of particles of a given size that were captured by the apparatus 10, irrespective of the location of their collection, but did not account for internal losses. Counting the number of spores collected on a slide (CSLIDE) and then comparing this number with spore concentration upstream of the sampler (CUP), the actual collection efficiency was calculated as follows:
E Cmicroscope=(1−C SLIDE /C UP)×100%, (2)
The difference between the collection efficiencies EC and ECmicroscope represents the particle losses inside the impactor. Therefore, ECmicroscope is a more accurate performance characteristic for evaluating a bioaerosol sampler.
The collection efficiencies of the fungal spores for each configuration is presented in
Although the present invention has been shown and described in considerable detail with respect to only a few exemplary embodiments thereof, it should be understood by those skilled in the art that we do not intend to limit the invention to the embodiments since various modifications, omissions and additions may be made to the disclosed embodiments without materially departing from the novel teachings and advantages of the invention, particularly in light of the foregoing teachings. Accordingly, we intend to cover all such modifications, omissions, additions and equivalents as may be included within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the following claims. In the claims, means-plus-function clauses are intended to cover the structures described herein as performing the recited function and not only structural equivalents but also equivalent structures. Thus, although a nail and a screw may not be structural equivalents in that a nail employs a cylindrical surface to secure wooden parts together, whereas a screw employs a helical surface, in the environment of fastening wooden parts, a nail and a crew may be equivalent structures.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3741001 *||Mar 20, 1972||Jun 26, 1973||Nasa||Apparatus for sampling particulates in gases|
|US3949594||Sep 25, 1974||Apr 13, 1976||The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of Interior||Two-stage disposable particle sampling head|
|US3957469||Feb 3, 1975||May 18, 1976||Mine Safety Appliances Company||Filter cassette with removable capsule|
|US3966439||Nov 11, 1974||Jun 29, 1976||Vennos Spyros Lysander N||Fluid sampling device|
|US4321822||Jun 5, 1980||Mar 30, 1982||The Regents Of The University Of Minnesota||Impactor apparatus|
|US4524811 *||Aug 1, 1984||Jun 25, 1985||Taylor Julian S||Engine oil sampling device|
|US4606232||Apr 16, 1985||Aug 19, 1986||Vittorio Prodl||Device for separating airborne particles in dependence on grain size|
|US4670135||Jun 27, 1986||Jun 2, 1987||Regents Of The University Of Minnesota||High volume virtual impactor|
|US4725294||Mar 13, 1987||Feb 16, 1988||Vlsi Standards, Inc.||Apparatus for collection of particulate matter from an ambient gas|
|US4796475||Jun 25, 1987||Jan 10, 1989||Regents Of The University Of Minnesota||Personal air sampling impactor|
|US4961916 *||Jun 2, 1988||Oct 9, 1990||Irsst-Institut De Recherche En Sante Et En Securite Du Travail Du Quebec||Sampling device|
|US4972957||Sep 27, 1988||Nov 27, 1990||Regents Of The University Of Minnesota||Particle concentrating sampler|
|US5201231||Apr 21, 1992||Apr 13, 1993||Dorothy A. Smith||Volumetric air sampler for collecting multiple discrete samples|
|US5304125 *||Mar 23, 1993||Apr 19, 1994||The University Of North Carolina||Apparatus for administering solid particulate aerosols to the lungs|
|US5693895||Feb 26, 1996||Dec 2, 1997||Baxter; Daniel M.||Versatile airborne particle impaction sampler|
|US5783756||Dec 8, 1995||Jul 21, 1998||New York University||Portable sampler for volatile aerosols|
|US6101886||Nov 25, 1998||Aug 15, 2000||Pacific Sierra Research||Multi-stage sampler concentrator|
|US6463814 *||Nov 3, 2000||Oct 15, 2002||Graftech||Bioaerosol slit impaction sampling device|
|US6692553||Oct 10, 2001||Feb 17, 2004||Environmental Monitoring Systems, Inc.||Particle collection apparatus and method|
|US20020066321 *||Jan 25, 2002||Jun 6, 2002||Graftech||Bioaerosol slit impaction sampling device|
|JPS6375639A *||Title not available|
|1||Marple, Virgil A. and Willeke, Klaus, Impactor Design, Mechanical Engineering Department, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, Apr. 6, 1976.|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US7473301 *||Sep 17, 2002||Jan 6, 2009||Euv Llc||Adhesive particle shielding|
|US7631568||Dec 15, 2009||Quest Technologies||Particulate monitor|
|US7987695||Sep 9, 2009||Aug 2, 2011||3M Innovative Properties Company||Particulate monitor|
|US8813583||Jun 21, 2011||Aug 26, 2014||3M Innovative Properties Company||Particulate monitor|
|US20040050317 *||Sep 17, 2002||Mar 18, 2004||Klebanoff Leonard Elliott||Adhesive particle shielding|
|US20060185520 *||May 4, 2006||Aug 24, 2006||Jordan John L Sr||Particle collection apparatus and method|
|US20070107495 *||Nov 13, 2006||May 17, 2007||Dong-Hyun Kim||Particle adsorption chamber, sampling apparatus having a particle adsorption chamber, and sampling method using the same|
|US20090056417 *||Aug 28, 2007||Mar 5, 2009||Quest Technologies, Inc.||Particulate monitor|
|US20090320562 *||Dec 31, 2009||Kilps Patrick J||Particulate monitor|
|USRE42231 *||Aug 18, 2005||Mar 22, 2011||Spurgeon Joe C||Adaptable filter sampling device|
|U.S. Classification||96/413, 55/465, 55/435, 73/863.22|
|International Classification||G01N1/24, G01N1/00, B01D45/10|
|Feb 27, 2007||CC||Certificate of correction|
|Feb 12, 2010||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|May 15, 2014||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 8
|May 15, 2014||SULP||Surcharge for late payment|
Year of fee payment: 7