|Publication number||US7179205 B2|
|Application number||US 10/685,625|
|Publication date||Feb 20, 2007|
|Filing date||Oct 15, 2003|
|Priority date||May 31, 1996|
|Also published as||US7641597, US20040077465, US20070111864, US20090197743|
|Publication number||10685625, 685625, US 7179205 B2, US 7179205B2, US-B2-7179205, US7179205 B2, US7179205B2|
|Original Assignee||David Schmidt|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (20), Non-Patent Citations (1), Referenced by (10), Classifications (75), Legal Events (3)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
This application claims benefit under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Application, Ser. No. 60/418,461 filed Oct. 15, 2002. This application claims further benefit as a Continuation-in-Part of application Ser. No. 09/977,123 filed Oct. 12, 2001, which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 08/865,235 filed May 29, 1997. U.S. Pat. No. 6,302,829, which claims benefit of application No. 60/018,755 filed May 31, 1996.
The present invention relates to an apparatus for performing exercise and a method for using such apparatus and in particular to an apparatus which closely simulates many natural forms of exercise such as cross-country skiing, walking, running, biking, climbing and the like. The present invention further relates to an apparatus for replicating the reciprocating nature of motion during exercise, and more particularly to an apparatus for exercise, rehabilitation, amusement, and/or simulation of human-powered motion.
Many forms of natural exercise (i.e., exercise performed without the use of a stationary exercise machine) provide numerous benefits to an exerciser. In a number of types of natural exercise, a bilateral motion is performed of such a nature that in addition to the work done by a muscle group on one side of the body used, e.g., to attain forward motion in a motive type of exercise, there is simultaneously some amount of resistance to the muscle groups on the other side of the body, typically opposing types of muscle groups, so that both extension and flexion muscle groups are exercised. In a typical bilateral exercise such as cross-country skiing, the exerciser utilizes gluteus maximus and hamstring muscles in the backward stroke and, simultaneously, on the opposite side, quadriceps and hip flexor muscles in the forward stroke.
Although various attempts have been made to simulate cross-country ski exercise or other bilateral exercise on a stationary exercise machine, these attempts have not been fully successful in reproducing the experience with sufficient accuracy to provide many of the health benefits of natural exercise. For example, in some ski-type exercise devices, while the trailing limb encounters resistance, the opposite limb encounters virtually no resistance (typically only resistance from fiction of moving machine parts). As a result, many such previous devices include a feature intended to counteract the force of the backward thrusting limb, such as an abdomen pad which receives the forward thrust of the exerciser's body as the exerciser pushes backward against resistance with each leg in an alternating fashion. This abdominal pad keeps the user in a stationary fore/aft position. It is believed that in such (stationary) machines, pushing against the abdominal pad can lead to lower back stress and fatigue and detracts from an accurate simulation of the natural cross-country ski exercise. It is further believed that the lack of forward resistance and the associated lack of balance in such devices lead to a long learning curve such that, to successfully use the machine, a user must develop a new technique for walking or skiing which is very different from that found in nature.
Another feature of many natural bilateral exercises such as skiing, walking, running, jogging, bicycle riding, etc., is that while the exerciser may on average move forward at a constant velocity, the exerciser momentarily accelerates and decelerates as he begins and ends each stroke. As a result, in many natural bilateral exercises, although the exerciser maintains a constant average speed, in fact if one were to travel alongside the exerciser at such constant speed, the exerciser would appear to be oscillating forward and backward with respect to the observer. This constant change in velocity is natural to most forms of human propulsion by virtue of an alternating stride while walking, running, bicycling, etc.
Again, it is believed that many stationary exercise devices fail to reproduce this feature of the natural exercise with sufficient accuracy to provide an enjoyable exercise experience and to provide all the benefits available with natural exercise, such as a more natural and less stressful distribution of force on the joints and development of good balance. For example, with the above-described ski exercise machine, the exerciser is typically pushing against the abdominal pad during substantially most or all of the exercise, thus causing the exerciser to stay in substantially the same position rather than accelerate and decelerate in an oscillating manner as in natural skiing.
A number of forms of natural exercise provide benefits to the upper body as well as the lower body of the exerciser. For example, in cross-country skiing, the exerciser typically pushes using poles. A number of features of the upper body exercise in natural exercise settings are of interest in the context of the present invention. For example, during cross-country skiing, the arm and leg motions are related such that if a skier wishes to maintain constant average speed, exerting greater upper body effort (“poling” with the arms) results in less effort being exerted by the legs, and vice versa. Further, in cross-country skiing, although the arm and leg energy exertions are related, the left and right upper body exertions are independent in the sense that the user does not need to pole in an alternating fashion, much less a fashion which is necessarily synchronized with the leg motions. A cross-country skier may “double pole”, i.e., pushing with both poles at the same time, or may, if desired, push with only a single pole or no poles for a period of time. Another feature of cross-country skiing is that while the skier is moving, when a pole is plunged into the snow, the pole engages a resistance medium which relative to the skier is already in motion, thus providing what may be termed “kinetic resistance”.
Many types of previous exercise devices have failed to provide a completely satisfactory simulation of natural upper body exercise. For example, many previous ski devices provided only for dependent arm motion, i.e., such that the arms were essentially grasping opposite ends of the rope wound around a spindle. In such devices, as the left arm moved backward, the right arm was required to simultaneously move forward substantially the same amount. Thus it was impossible to accurately simulate double poling or poling with a single arm. Many previous devices provided upper body resistance that was entirely unrelated to lower body resistance. In such devices, if an exerciser was expending a given level of effort, by exerting greater upper body efforts, the user was not, thereby, permitted to correspondingly decrease lower body exercises while maintaining the same overall level of effort. Many previous devices having upper body resistance mechanisms provided what may be termed “static resistance” such that when the arm motion began, such as by thrusting or pushing, or pulling backward with one arm, the resistance device was being started up from a stopped position, typically making it necessary to overcome a coefficient of static friction and detracting from the type of kinetic or dynamic resistance experienced in the natural cross-country ski exercise.
Many types of exercise devices establish a speed or otherwise establish a level of user effort in such a fashion that the user must manually make an adjustment or operate a control in order to change the level of effort. Even when an exercise device has a microprocessor or other apparatus for automatically changing levels of effort, these changes are pre-programmed and the user cannot change the level of effort to a level different from the pre-programmed scheme without manually making an adjustment or providing an input to control during the exercise. For example, often a treadmill-style exercise machine is configured to operate at a predetermined level or series of pre-programmed levels, such that when the user wishes to depart from his or her predetermined level or series of levels, the user must make an adjustment or provide other input. In contrast, during natural exercise such as biking, the user may speed up, slow down, change gears, or rest at will.
Additionally, current human motion simulating machines such as exercise bikes, skiers, rowers, etc. have one very important aspect in common; they are considered stationary machines. In other words, the platform on which the user sits or stands is fixed in location. As discussed below, this stationary aspect prevents these devices from realistically exhibiting the sensation of natural motion.
When a person propels a bicycle, cross country skis, row boat, etc., there are subtle fore and aft motions encountered by both the person and the vehicle. Although the amplitude and duration of these motions are somewhat specific to a particular vehicle, they are all tied directly to the force output generated by the person propelling the vehicle. For example, when a person rides a bicycle, these subtle motions occur as a result of his pedaling, and the reciprocating action of the user's legs is what ultimately motivates the bicycle in a forward direction. When closely examining the physics behind the forward motion of a bicycle it becomes apparent that the bicycle and user are in a continual state of acceleration and deceleration while the user pedals. This is due to the fact that when the user exerts a force on one of the pedals, the bicycle and user accelerate until that pedal begins to approach the bottom of its stroke, at which point the bicycle and user begin to decelerate. As the opposite pedal reaches the top of its stroke, this cycle begins again. As a result, the cyclist is in a constant state of acceleration and deceleration. This oscillating motion can be easily witnessed by driving in a car at a constant speed along side a cyclist. From the perspective of an occupant of the car looking out a side window, the rider will appear to move fore and aft in a manner directly related to his pedaling cadence. This fore and aft movement will generally be between a range of one-half of an inch on level or downhill terrain to several inches on an uphill grade.
When a rider encounters a hill, he generally changes the gear ratio of his bike by “changing gears” such that a lower ratio is used. The rider can therefore maintain the same cadence and force output as he would on level ground resulting in a slower speed up hill. For example, it is the goal of a profession cyclist to maintain a relatively steady cadence, normally 80–100 strokes per minute. This is the case whether riding on level terrain, up hill or down hill. The use of a gearing system ensures that a constant cadence is maintained, even though the speed of the bicycle may vary drastically.
The use of a gearing system also affects the motion of the vehicle being ridden. For example, the fore and aft oscillation of a bicycle is much greater in low gear vs. high gear due to the increased torque applied to the drive wheel. As a result, in low gear there is much less stress on the leg joints and muscles. This is particularly important in physical therapy and rehabilitation. For example, a person recovering from reconstructive knee surgery may be advised by a physician to exercise the knee with very low exertion. In this case, it would be advantageous for the person to exercise on a bicycle in a low gear ratio to reduce stress on the recovering knee.
An important aspect of natural human motion is the concept of rest. For example, during the deceleration phase of the oscillation described above, the muscles experience a short period of rest. This rest period increases as the period of oscillation increases. When a rider pushes a pedal once every few seconds, the bicycle coasts during the rest periods.
Current exercise bicycles generally include a user seat on a frame with a set of pedals which spin a flywheel. The flywheel is magnetically or otherwise braked to give resistance to the user's legs. These machines generally simulate hill climbing by simply adding greater resistance to the flywheel which requires either a greater force output or slower pedaling cadence by the user and adds increased pressure to the legs and joints. The stationary nature of these machines precludes the user from experiencing the fore and aft motion encountered while using a real bicycle. Instead, although the user's body strains to oscillate forward and backward, the stationary aspect of the machine keeps him fixed in one place. This causes a jerky sensation which translates into an uncomfortable and non-motivating activity, as well as the potentially dangerous wear and tear on the user's joints and muscles.
The solid line in the chart of
Similar principles apply to the activity of natural rowing when compared to the use of a stationary rowing exercise machine. When rowing a boat with a sliding seat, the user straps his feet to a stationary part of the boat and sits on a seat facing rearward which can slide fore and aft. At the beginning of the stroke, the user bends his knees so as to bring his body toward the rear of the boat. He then extends his arms fully and engages the oar blades into the water. Next he straightens his legs and pulls the oars toward his torso. At the end of each stroke, the user pulls the oar blades out of the water and returns to the beginning of his stroke to start the sequence again.
As with the bicycle, a person following alongside a rower at a steady speed will observe the boat and user oscillating fore and aft with each stroke. As the user engages the oar blades and begins his stroke (the power stroke), the boat and user accelerate forward. When the user reaches the end of his stroke and returns (return stroke) to the starting position, the boat and user decelerate. Relative to the observer, this oscillation will be considerably greater than that of a bicycle, and, depending on the amount of time the user takes on his return stroke, may exceed one foot.
Most rowing exercise machines confine a user to a fixed location, i.e. the user's feet are strapped to a stationary pad. These designs don't allow for any fore and aft movement of the user's body other than the sliding of the seat. This results in a jerking sensation at the beginning and end of each stroke. These rowing machines can cause strain on the back and legs and over-compression of the knees. See
These stationary exercise bike and rower examples demonstrate the need for a more realistic exercise machine capable of accurately replicating the forces of nature as they apply to human powered locomotion devices. The present invention overcomes the above-mentioned obstacles and can be applied to any type of exercise device which uses the reciprocating nature of human motion such as a bike machine, a rowing machine, a cross-country ski machine and any other reciprocating motion apparatus and the like. The present invention can be likened to a human propelled differential motion machine, much like the differential on an automobile. In particular, a dynamic element moves in one direction (input 1), the user mounts a carriage and motivates a drive wheel (or the like) in the opposite direction (input 2), and the user and carriage move based on the difference between the two inputs, or the differential.
Accordingly, it would be useful to provide an exercise device and method which provides a more natural exercise feel, more closely simulates a variety of different natural exercises such as skiing, walking, running, bicycling, etc., exercises both extension and flexion muscle groups, provides for automatic and/or hands-free adjustment in a reaction to the level of user effort, and in general provides for safe, effective and enjoyable exercise experiences on a psuedo stationary exercise device.
It is a general objective of the present invention to provide a new differential motion apparatus.
It is another general object of the present invention to provide a new and improved exercise apparatus.
It is a more specific object of the present invention to provide an apparatus which exhibits the reciprocating nature of human motion.
It is another more specific object of the present invention to provide an improved human motion apparatus which greatly reduces the stress on joints and muscles.
Yet another object of the present invention is to provide a human motion device which can simulate uphill and downhill propulsion.
Another object of the present invention is to provide a machine capable of simulating human motion and which can coast during periods of user rest.
These and other objects, features and advantages of the present invention will be clearly understood through a consideration of the following detailed description.
A human motion device has a carriage adapted for user engagement as well as reciprocating movement. The device further has a dynamic element capable of movement in a direction and a way to provide a force against the carriage such that the carriage is urged in the same direction. A way to engage the dynamic element enables the user to propel the carriage in the opposite direction.
The features of the present invention, which are believed to be novel, are set forth with particularity in the appended claims. The invention, together with the further objects and advantages thereof, may best be understood by reference to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in the several figures of which like reference numerals identify like elements, and in which:
As seen in
Coupled to the frame on the left side thereof are front and rear idler wheels 9, 25, supporting a simulated ski 22 bearing a ski-type foot support 21, preferably having both toe and heel cups to permit the user to slide the simulated ski both in a forward direction and in a rearward direction against resistance, as described more fully below. The ski 22 can be made of a number of materials, including wood, fiberglass, metal, ceramic, resin, reinforced or composite materials. Preferably the ski 22 can be translated in a forward 112 or rear 114 direction while supported by idler wheels 9, 25. If desired, additional idler wheels can be provided and/or additional supports such as a low-friction support plate or rail, or a belt, cable, chain, or other device running between idler wheels 9, 25 can be used.
In the depicted embodiment the ski 22 is coupled to a roller 116 such that translation of the ski 22 in a forward direction 112 rotates the roller 116 in a first direction 118, and translation of the ski 22 in the opposite direction 114 rotates roller 116 in the opposite direction 122. Coupling to achieve such driven rotation of the roller 116 can be achieved in a number of fashions. For example, the roller's exterior cylindrical surface 124 and the bottom surface 126 of the ski 22 may be provided with high friction coatings. Teeth may be provided on the surfaces of the ski 22 and the roller 116 to drive the roller in a rack-and-pinion-like fashion. Ski 22 may be coupled to a line wrapper about the roller 116. Although in the view of
In the depicted embodiment, resistance to rearward movement 114 of the ski 22 is achieved by coupling the driven roller 116 so as to, in turn, drive a flywheel 17 which can be braked as described more fully below. As depicted in
In the depicted embodiment, the driveshaft 31 is coupled to a second shaft 35 via V-belt 18, running around sheaves 19, 16. Second shaft 35 is directly coupled to the flywheel 17. Thus, driving the driveshaft 31 results in rotation of the flywheel 17.
Because the flywheel, by virtue of its mass and effective radius (diameter) requires a substantial amount of energy to rotate, the flywheel creates a certain amount of resistance to rotation of the driven rollers and thus, the translation of skis 22 a, 22 b. Looked at in another way, and without wishing to be bound by any theory, it is believed the flywheel 17 resists the energy generated by the user in moving the skis rearwardly, causing the user's body to thrust forward. In the depicted embodiment, the speed of rotation of the flywheel can be controlled using mechanisms described more thoroughly below.
Preferably, resistance is also provided to rotation of the driven roller 116 a, 116 b in the opposite (forward) direction 118. Such resistance can be useful in more accurately simulating natural exercise, such as a resistance to forward-sliding of cross-country skis through snow. In the depicted embodiment, brake pads 29 a, 29 b are urged against the inner faces of the one-way clutches 20 a, 20 b, e.g., by brake springs 30 a, 30 b. Preferably the brake pad 29 is coupled to the driveshaft 31 so as to rotate therewith. Accordingly, when a ski 22 is moved in the rearward direction 114 and the corresponding one-way clutch 20 a is engaged with driveshaft 31, the brake pad 29 a rotates with the inner face 132 a of the one-way clutch 20 a so that substantially no friction braking of the one-way clutch 20 a or driven roller 116 a occurs. However, when the ski 22 a is moved in the forward direction 112 so that the driven roller 116 a is rotated in the forward rotational direction 118 and the one-way clutch is disengaged, the roller 116 a and brake pad 29 are rotating in opposite directions 118, 122 respectively so that friction braking of the driven roller 116 a occurs, providing frictional resistance to forward motion of the ski 22 a.
In the depicted embodiment, a screw adjustment 27 is provided for adjusting the amount of friction (i.e., the pressure) of the brake pads 29 a, 29 b against the inner faces 132 a, 132 b of the rollers 116 a, 116 b. In the depicted embodiment, threaded adjust screws 27 are secured through the lower frame members 23 such that they press against the bearings 28. As the screws 27 are tightened, they force the bearings 28 to press against the clutches 20 which in turn press against the brake pads 29 and compress the springs 30 thereby increasing the intensity of the one-way friction.
When the clip 8 is coupled to the user, such as by clipping to the user's belt or other clothing, net movement of the user backward 114 on the exercise machine relative to the frame 23 will result in tightening the friction band 14 on the flywheel 17 (in an amount dependent, at least partly, on the spring constant of the spring 13 and/or the effective spring constant of the elastic cord 26), thus slowing the rotation of the flywheel 17. As described above, the flywheel 17 is driven by the movement of the skis 22 and/or hand grips 1 a, 1 b in a one-way fashion, i.e., such that, in the absence of braking, moving the skis and hand grips faster tends to rotate the flywheel faster.
When the user is in the rearmost position of the machine 136, the friction band is at its tightest around the flywheel, preventing it entirely from spinning. As the user begins exercising and moves forward 112, pressure is released from the friction band and the flywheel begins spinning. Once the user has reached the speed desired by the user (i.e., the level of effort desired by the user), the user continues to exercise at this level and the system will automatically substantially maintain the corresponding speed of the flywheel. If the user slows his or her pace, the user will begin to drift back on the machine 114, under gravity power because of the machine incline 142, resulting in the tightening of the friction band 14 and the slowing of the flywheel speed. As the user speeds up his or her pace, he or she will move forward on the machine 112, decreasing the pressure on the fiction band and thereby increasing the flywheel speed. Thus the system provides a method for speed control operated simply by the exerciser increasing or decreasing his or her level of effort. Thus there is no requirement for manual adjustments in order to change the intensity of the workout.
In practice, the user will mount the device, insert his or her feet into the foot support 21 of the skis 22 and grasp the hand grips 1. The user will attach the clothing clip 8 to his or her clothing. Initially the user will be near the rear-most position 136 and the friction band 14 will be at its tightest. The user will move the skis in reciprocating fashion with a normal skiing motion and, because of the resistance mechanisms described above, the user will begin to move up 112 the incline 142 toward the front of the machine 138 and will cause the flywheel to begin rotating. Once the flywheel begins to spin, as the user's position fore and aft on the machine changes, there will be resultant constant variations in the machine friction band tension on the flywheel. As the user slows, the momentum of the flywheel will tend to propel him or her backward. However, as the user moves back, the friction band is tightened, as described above, and thus the flywheel begins to slow down until a balance is attained. As the user speeds up, the friction band is eased, and the flywheel is allowed to accelerate. This system will thus automatically vary the machine speed based on the user's position without the need to make manual adjustments or input. The user can, however, adjust the machine in a number of ways to affect the intensity of the exercise, if desired. The user may turn the adjusting knobs 27 to increase or decrease the forward resistance (e.g., to simulate varying friction conditions of snow). The user may change the incline of the machine 142 to increase or decrease the intensity of the exercise. If desired, the user will also pull on the ropes or hand grips 1 a, 1 b in the desired fashion for upper body resistance exercise. The user may pull on the ropes in an alternating fashion, parallel fashion, using either arm alone or the user may refrain from pulling on the ropes at all. As the user expends a greater level of effort (the sum of leg backward effort and any rope-pulling), the machine will automatically adjust the amount of friction on the flywheel 17 owing to the user's movement up or down the incline of the machine, depending on the user's level of effort.
A somewhat different speed control configuration is depicted in
In the embodiment of
In the embodiment of
Without wishing to be bound by any theory, it is believed that when an exerciser is exercising on a device according to the present invention, and if there is no net or average fore-aft movement (i.e., the exerciser is substantially maintaining his or her fore-aft position) the amount of resistance to a backward leg thrust is equal to the amount of resistance to forward movement of the opposite leg. It is believed that when the device is inclined, the resistance to forward movement has a contribution both from the one-way friction brake described above and resistance to movement up the incline, against gravity. During use of the device, the speed of rearward leg movement (ignoring arm exercise, for the moment) will be regulated by the speed of rotation of the flywheel which will be moving at a substantially constant speed if the user is maintaining his or her fore-aft position on the machine. It is believed that the friction band, when it is applied as described to selectively slow the flywheel, is operating so as to balance the effect of gravity when the machine is inclined, in the sense that, if there were no friction band or other selective flywheel speed control, the user would tend to slide backward toward the rear most position on the machine when the machine is inclined. It is believed that, in situations where a user moves forward or aft on the machine, there is a temporary small difference between the forward resistance and the rearward resistance.
As noted above, during bilateral motion using the exercise device of
In the depicted embodiment, the forward feet 526 are coupled to the lower frame 523 by pivot arm 66. The pivot arm 66 can be held in any of the variety of pivot locations by adjusting the extension of link arm 528. Thus, if the user wishes to increase the inclination 542 to an inclination greater than that depicted in
When the device of
As discussed above in connection with
As depicted in
In the embodiment described above in connection with
Another embodiment is depicted in
The cars 1102 are designed to slide or travel linearly up and down 1106 the tracks. In the depicted embodiment, the cars travel on the tracks 1104 supported by wheels 1108 a, b which are configured to maintain low rolling resistance to the tracks while carrying the full weight of the user.
A cable or belt 1110 attaches to the back of each car 1102 and extends in a loop over rear pulley 1112 and front pulley with integral one-way locking mechanism 1114, to attach to the front of the car 1102. The integral one-way locking mechanism of the front pulley can be, for example, similar to that used for the one-way clutches 20 a, b of the embodiment of
As depicted in
The arm exercise lines 68 a, 68 b are wrapped around spools 72 a, 72 b coupled by one-way clutches 712 a, 712 b to the driveshaft 83. A number of one-way clutches can be used for this purpose, including clutches similar to those 20 a, 20 b used in connection with the driven rollers 116 a, 116 b. The spools 72 a, 72 b are coupled by the clutches 712 a, 712 b to the driveshaft 83 in such a manner that unwinding either of the ropes 68 a, 68 b by pulling on the hand grips 75 a, 75 b, 77 a, will cause the clutch to engage and lock against the shaft 83 in the same direction that the shaft is spinning the belt drive rollers 70. A pair of recoil springs 71 a, 71 b retract the ropes 68 a, 68 b onto the spools 71 a, 71 b when the user relaxes tension on the ropes 68 a, 68 b.
By pulling on either end of the ropes 812, 814, i.e., by pulling on hand grips 75 a, 75 b or rail grips 77 a, 77 b, the movable pulleys 818 a, 818 b are, respectively, pulled upward, unspooling lines 68 a, 68 b from the spool 72 a, 72 b such that the user perceives the resistance to be pulling on the handle 75, 77 (greater than internal or friction resistance) if the speed of pulling is such that the spools 72 a, 72 b are rotating at a rotational rate faster than that of the current rotational rate of the shaft 83. The linear speed of the rope ends 75 a, 75 b, 77 a, 77 b is related to rotational rate of the spools 72 a, 72 b. In one embodiment, this can be done by pulling each rope 68 a, 68 b until it is completely unwound from the spools 72 a, 72 b and rewrapping it under manual guidance, on a different portion of the spools with a different diameter. The same effect could be achieved using a bicycle-type derailleur to automatically shift the ropes from one diameter section to another. Although in the depicted embodiment only two diameters of spool are shown, three or more could be provided if desired, or a single diameter could be provided. It is also possible to couple the spools 72 a, 72 b to the driveshaft 83 via a linkage such as a chain drive, belt drive, gear train or the like, which could be provided with changeable transmissions for changing the effective ratio and thus the relative resistance to arm exercise.
In use, the exerciser can choose to manually control the motor speed, e.g., via a manual potentiometer knob or other adjustment, or can rely on the speed controller described above for automatic adjustment. The user steps onto the footcars 50 and, beginning at the rearmost position, typically, starts an alternating “walking” type motion. Initially, the conveyor belts are stopped and thus the wheels with the one way clutches on the foot cars allow the cars to slide forward but not backward. As a result, the user moves towards the front of the machine. As the user moves forward, the speed control circuit, as described above, causes the motor 53 to begin driving the belts. As the user approaches the front of the machine, the user may, if desired, grasp the hand grips 75 a, 75 b or 77 a, 77 b, preferably continuing the walking motion. As the motor begins to move the conveyor belts, the user's position is changed relative to the frame of the exerciser and the speed control circuit, described above, continually adjusts the speed of the conveyor belts to the user's stride.
Preferably the rails 79 can be pivoted so that they can be folded out of the way as depicted in
Preferably, the unit will not start unless the range (i.e., the distance of the user from the front of the machine) is less than a predetermined amount such as two feet 1022. If the user is not in this range, the procedure loops 1024 until the user moves within range. Once the user has moved within range, the machine is initially in start-up mode and the speed is set to a predetermined initial speed such as 25% of maximum speed 1026. In one embodiment, the controller will ramp up a speed gradually so that the output from the microcontroller board can go immediately to 25% upon start-up. Assuming the maximum velocity condition has not been exceeded 1016, if the range stays below three feet 1028 within three seconds 1032 while the device is in start-up mode 1034 the speed will increase by 10% 1036 each second 1038, looping 1042 through this start-up procedure 1044 until the user exceeds a range of three feet 1028. Once the user exceeds a range of three feet from the front of the machine 1028, i.e., is within the range of three feet to four feet 1046, the motor speed 53 will be maintained 1048 and the machine will thereafter be considered to be in run mode 1052.
In general, the speed of the machine will be maintained constant whenever the user is in a predetermined range such as three to four feet 1046. Once the device is out of start-up mode, in general, the procedure will decrease motor speed if the position exceeds four feet or increase motor speed if the range falls below three feet, (until such time as the user exceeds a predetermined maximum range 1012 or a predetermined speed 1016). In the depicted embodiment, if the range goes to 4.1 to 4.3 feet 1054 the speed will be decreased by five percent 1056 every second 1058 until the range is back to three to four feet 1046 at which point the present speed will be maintained 1048. If the range goes to 4.4 to 4.6 feet 1062 the speed will be decreased by 10 percent 1064 every half second 1066 until the range is back to three to four feet 1046. If the range goes to 4.7 to 4.9 feet 1068 the speed will be decreased by 20 percent 1072 every half second 1074 until the range is back to three to four feet. If the range exceeds five feet 1012, the motor speed will be set to zero 1014 and the unit will not start again until the range is less than two feet 1022. If the range goes to 2.9 to 2.7 feet 1076 the speed will be increased by five percent 1078 every second 1082 until the range is back to three to four feet. If the range goes to 2.6 feet or less 1084 the speed will be increased by 10 percent 1086 every half second 1088 until the range is back to three to four feet or full speed is attained, at which point present speed will be maintained. As will be clear to those of skill in the art, the number of categories of speed, the amount of increase in speed and the rate at which speed increments are added can all be varied. Additionally, it is possible to define motor speed as a continuous function of position, rather than as a discrete (stepwise) function. Other types of control can be used such as controls which automatically vary the speed at predetermined times, or in predetermined circumstances, e.g., to simulate different snow or terrain conditions, controls which automatically raise or lower the elevation 528, 542 to simulate variations in terrain and the like.
In light of the above description a number of advantages of the present invention can be seen. The present invention more accurately simulates natural exercise than most previous devices. In one embodiment the device provides resistance to forward or upward leg movement rather than only rearward leg movement. Preferably forward leg movement resistance can be adjusted. Preferably the device controls the speed and/or resistance offered or perceived and, in one embodiment speed is controlled in response to the fore-aft location of the user on the machine. In one embodiment, the fore-aft location is detected automatically and may, in some embodiments, be detected without physically connecting the user to the machine, e.g., by a clothing clip or otherwise. The device is capable of providing upper body exercise, preferably such that, as a user maintains a given level of overall effort, expenditure of greater lower body efforts permits expenditure of less upper body effort and vice versa. Preferably the arm exercise is bilaterally independent such that user may exercise left and right arms alternately, in parallel, or may exercise only one or neither arm during leg exercise.
A number of variations and modifications of the present invention can be used. In general, the described method of speed control (preferably involving automatically adjusting speed or perceived resistance based on fore-aft position of the user, without the need for manual input or control) is applicable to exercise machines other than ski simulation machines, including treadmill or other running or walking machines, stair climbing simulators, bicycling simulators, rowing machines, climbing simulators, and the like.
Although embodiments are described in which speed control is provided by a braked flywheel, other speed control devices can also be used. The flywheel could be braked by a drum-type brake or a pressure plate- or pad-type brake in addition to the circumferential pressure belt brake. The drive roller 116 could be coupled to drive an electric generator for generating energy, e.g., to be dissipated with variable resistance. The flywheel 17 can be provided with fins, blades, or otherwise configured to be resisted by air resistance.
Although the embodiment of
In one embodiment, the inclination 542 can be changed automatically, e.g., by extending link arm 528 using a motor to drive a rack and pinion connection. Preferably, the motor is activated in response to manual user input or in response to a pre-programmed or pre-stored exercise routine such that the device can be elevated during exercise.
Although in the embodiment of
Although it is recognized that there may be some amount of resistance to forward (or upward) leg movement arising from internal machine resistance and/or overcoming the effects of gravity, preferably the exercise device of the present invention can provide forward or upward leg movement resistance which is greater than internal machine resistance and/or gravity resistance and preferably is adjustable (which internal machine resistance and gravity resistance typically are not).
Although it is anticipated that users will typically perform leg exercise in an alternating, reciprocal fashion, preferably the exercise device does not force the user into this type of exercise. In the depicted embodiments, there is nothing in the machine that would prevent a user from moving one leg more vigorously than the other (or even keeping one leg stationary) although it might be necessary to adjust speed control to accommodate this type of movement.
Perhaps the most important advantage of the present invention is its ability to replicate the forces found in nature. This advantage is illustrated in its simplest form by the graphical representation of
Generally, the present invention consists of a user mountable carriage designed to slide in the fore and aft direction. The carriage contains a power transfer element, such as pedals, arm levers or the like, which convert the user's motions into a means for propelling the carriage relative to a dynamic element. A dynamic element generally consists of an endless belt or the like driven by a motor or by a slight incline to a base frame. Additionally, a rearward friction or force element causes a rearward force against the carriage preferably relative to the dynamic element. This rearward force to the carriage can simulate the drag and other resistance encountered in nature.
As a user operates the motion machine designed according to the principles of the present invention he generates a cyclic motion of the user carriage caused by the reciprocating action of his arms and/or legs. As a result, the carriage will be in a constant state of acceleration and deceleration within its framework. For discussion purposes, this cyclic motion includes and will be defined as the power stroke, (such as when a user begins pushing on a pedal) and a rest stroke (such as when a user reaches the bottom of his pedal stroke). During the power stroke the user sends power through the power transfer element on the carriage to the dynamic element. During the rest stroke, the carriage is pushed by the dynamic or other force element.
A speed controller, such as a potentiometer on the motorized version of this embodiment, controls the speed of the machine. Alternatively, an automatic speed control can be used which ascertains the fore/aft position of the carriage within the support frame and sets the motor speed accordingly. More specifically, when the carriage is positioned on the middle of the frame, the speed controller maintains the current motor speed. If the carriage begins to move rearward due to the user slowing down, the speed controller slows the motor speed to encourage the carriage to become centered again. Similarly, if the carriage begins to move forward due to the user speeding up, the speed controller increases the motor speed to once again encourage the carriage to become centered. This feature allows the user to exercise at whatever pace he desires, including the ability to speed up or slow down without making any adjustments to the machine.
For illustration purposes, the principles of the present invention have been and will continue to be shown and described as they relate to particular preferred embodiments of exercise apparatus and the like. However, it will be understood that these principles are in no way deemed to be limited to such described embodiments. In fact, it will be further understood that these principles will apply to any form of human propelled motion machines.
Referring now back to
Therefore, the graph of
The carriage assembly 1230 is slidably mounted on the support assembly 1240 via slide bearing 1260 over bearing rail 1380. It is preferred that such a bearing combination be chosen such that with a user's full body weight on the carriage 1230, the carriage 1230 fore and aft friction is minimal. Although there are many types of bearing systems that will allow the carriage to freely move in the fore and aft directions, the preferred embodiment depicts a slide rail design. Other designs may include ball bearings, roller bearings, Teflon™ bearings, magnetic levitation, fluid bearings, etc. Additional features of the bearing system might include a certain amount of flexibility so that as the user exerts force to motivate the carriage, a certain amount of “give” is present to absorb some of the shock. Also, the design may allow for side to side or up and down motion in order to better simulate, for example, the side-to-side motion encountered when riding a bicycle or the up and down sensation of hitting a bump. This may include the ability to steer the carriage 1230 left and right within the confines of the support assembly 1240.
Stops 1370 are placed on the front and back of the slide bearing rail 1380 to keep the carriage assembly 1230 within the usable fore/aft range of the bike machine 1220. Preferably, these stops 1370 will incorporate spring means to avoid abrupt stopping when the user reaches the front or back of the machine. The stops 1370 can be spaced apart such that the carriage moves as little as a few inches between stops. However, the greater the distance, the more pleasurable the exercise experience will be to the user as a greater distance will allow for the ability to coast and rest between pedal strokes without being driven to the back of the machine.
The carriage assembly 1230 has a drive train consisting of a standard bicycle crankset 1310 which drives the drive wheel 1340 and is preferably capable of using various gear ratios through the use of derailleur 1320. In order to properly simulate real bicycle riding it is important that the angular momentum of the drive wheel 1340 be equivalent to the angular momentum carried by a normal bicycle which would be equivalent to the sum of the angular momentum of the front wheel and the back wheel. Additionally, it is also important that the weight of the carriage 1230 be approximately the same as that of a normal bicycle.
Motor 1420 drives drive element 1390 which engages drive wheel 1340 and is aligned by idlers 1270. This drive element can be a rubber belt, a bicycle chain, a cable, etc. To properly simulate real bike riding, the motor should be able to convey the drive element from 0 to approximately 40 mph. In order to maintain a uniform speed during exercise, the motor should be chosen such that it is powerful enough to compensate for the constant cyclic action of the carriage. This can also be accomplished by giving a large amount of momentum to the drive elements by, for example, adding a flywheel to the motor.
Idlers 1270 hold the drive element 1390 against the drive wheel 1340. The friction between the drive element 1390 and the drive wheel 1340 is crucial in simulating the feel of a real bicycle riding. To properly calibrate this friction, the pressure of the idlers 1270 is set so that the rearward force applied to the carriage by the drive element at a given speed is equivalent to the rearward force applied to a real bicycle and idler at the same speed as the result of wind resistance and friction between the road and the tires. Alternatively, a fixed rearward (or forward when operated in reverse) force can be applied to the carriage such as with a spring or a hanging weight.
In operation, the user mounts the carriage assembly 1230 and turns on the motor 1420 to the desired speed and direction (as the present invention allows user propulsion of the carriage in either forward or backward direction). If the user does not pedal, the carriage assembly 1230 will be propelled to the back of the rail 1380 against the back stop 1370. As the user begins to pedal and the drive wheel 1340 reaches and exceeds the speed of the drive element, the carriage and user will begin to move forward. The goal of the user is to keep the carriage centered on the support assembly 1240.
By increasing or decreasing the motor 1420 speed, the user can vary the intensity of his workout. The user can also vary the pressure on the drive wheel tensioner 1280 to vary the intensity of his workout. By reducing resistance, the machine will exhibit the same characteristics as a racing bike with thin, slick, high-pressure-tires. On the other hand, increasing the resistance will make the machine exhibit the characteristics of a mountain bike with wide, knobby, low-pressure tires.
Preferably, the user can simulate hill riding (both up and down) with the use of incline/decline mechanism 1430. This mechanism tilts the entire machine 1220 with respect to the support surface 1440 and creates an incline/decline plane against which to exercise. Additionally, by including the derailleur 1320, the user can change gear ratios between the crankset 1310 and drive wheel 1340. This allows the user to maintain a steady cadence (pedal strokes per minute) over varying motor speeds and hill incline/decline.
The carriage assembly 1460 is slidably mounted to the frame assembly 1470 via slide bearing rail 1570. As previously discussed, the bearing combination is preferably chosen such that with the user's full body weight on the carriage 1460, the carriage fore and aft friction is minimal. This fore and aft motion is kept between a controlled range as defined by stops 1560. These stops would preferably incorporate spring means or the like to avoid abrupt stopping when the user carriage reaches the front or back of the machine 1450.
The crank set 1520 drives drive element 1580 which is preferably a bicycle chain, belt, cable, etc. Drive element 1580 passes over idler 1590, around tensioner idler 1610 and over drive element drive wheel 1600. Tensioning spring 1640 allows the carriage assembly 1460 to move freely fore and aft while maintaining constant tension on the drive element 1580. The larger diameter of the drive element drive wheel 1600 drives transfer element 1650 which is also preferably a bicycle chain, belt, cable, etc. This element 1650 passes through derailleur 1620 and around multigear sprocket 1630 (which is the equivalent to a multigear sprocket found on the rear wheel of a typical multi-speed bicycle). Parallel and directly attached to the multigear sprocket is a pulley which is driven by a motor 1670 and motor drive element 1660.
Additionally, friction element 1690 (also shown in
During operation, a user mounts the carriage 1460 and turns the motor 1670 on. As the motor spins, friction element 1690 applies a force to the friction element tether 1710 which pulls the carriage 1460 towards the back of the frame 1470. This friction increases with faster motor speed thereby urging the carriage backwards with greater force. As the user begins to pedal at a rate slightly faster than the rotation of drive element drive wheel 1600, the carriage 1460 will begin to move forward on the frame 1480. By operating gear shifter 1530, the user can vary the gear ratios on multi gear sprocket 1630, thereby simulating the various gear ratios on a multi-speed bicycle. In order to simulate hill riding, the incline/decline mechanism 1680 is adjusted accordingly.
The bike machine 1720 of
Yet another preferred embodiment of a bike machine incorporating the principles of the present invention is illustrated in
The crank set 2030 drives the multigear sprocket 2060 thereby driving crank set drive element 2050 which is coupled to carriage input 2080 through variable friction device 2130. The motor 2110, preferably including a flywheel or the like, drives the motor input 2090. Differential output 2100 is a spindle with differential drive element 2120 wrapped around it and fastened to the front and back of the frame 2140.
It is preferable to incorporate an adjustable friction device 2130 at a point between crank set drive element 2050 and differential input 2080. Adding a resistance at this point will cause the machine to exhibit the same characteristics as riding a bicycle on the road as this friction will simulate the forces of road and wind friction.
During operation, the user mounts the carriage 1970 and turns the motor speed to the desired setting. As the motor begins to rotate input 2090, differential output 2100 will begin to turn thereby sliding the carriage assembly 1970 toward the rear of the machine. As the user begins to pedal, carriage input 2080 begins to rotate. As the user reaches a pedaling cadence such that element 2080 and element 2090 are rotating at equal rates, the carriage assembly will remain in a relatively steady fore and aft position. If the user momentarily stops pedaling, the drive element 2050 will begin to slow causing differential output 2100 to rotate and drive the carriage assembly 1970 backwards. On the other hand, if the user speeds up his pace such that the input 2080 rotates faster than input 2090, differential output 2100 will drive the carriage assembly 1970 forward. Obviously, and as discussed with respect to
A variation of this embodiment can be operated without the use of a base frame. This can be done by replacing rail bearing 2000 and support assembly 1980 with wheels which allow the carriage to roll on a flat floor surface and driving the wheels with differential output 2100. During operation, the user would mount the machine, turn on the motor and pedal. If the user's speed is equal to that of the motor speed, the machine will stay in a relatively stationary location. If the user accelerates or decelerates, the machine will move forward or backward. Additionally, placing the machine on an incline or decline plane, hill riding can be simulated.
Although the bike machine embodiments of
During use, the front of the machine is slightly elevated and as the user begins to pedal, the carriage is propelled forward and slightly up due to the incline. Because of this incline, the tendency of the carriage will be to return towards the rear of the frame. If the user continues to pedal, the dynamic element 1390 will be traversing the drive wheel 1340, thereby rotating the flywheel (previously motor 1420). The rate of rotation of the flywheel can then be further controlled by various speed control methods.
The human propelled differential motion machine of the present invention may also be utilized to simulate rowing. The preferred embodiment of such a rowing machine 2180 consists of a carriage assembly 2190 and a base support assembly 2200 and is illustrated in
To operate, the user sets the motor speed to the desired level. The motor 2330 then drives element 2350 which engages drive wheel 2270 and friction device 2300 causing the carriage assembly 2190 to move toward the back of the machine 2180. The user then sits on the seat 2220 and secures his feet into the foot supports 2260. While bending his knees, the user grasps pull handle 2240 and begins a rowing motion which involves straightening his knees and pulling with his arms. As the user pulls on the handle, drive chain 2250 engages one way clutch 2280 and rotates drive wheel 2270. When the user reaches the end of his stroke, he bends his knees again and allows the recoil spring 2290 to retract the drive chain over the one way clutch in the freewheel direction. When the drive wheel 2270 exceeds the speed of drive element 2350, the carriage assembly 2210 begins to move towards the front of the machine 2180.
The user's goal with this rowing machine 2180 is again to maintain an average position between the stops 2370. As he exercises, the carriage will travel forward during the power portion of his stroke and rearward during the rest portion. Additional to the upstream/downstream effect the incline/decline mechanism 2380 can offer, a multispeed derailleur mechanism may be added to the drive wheel 2270. This would allow the user to increase or decrease the amount of effort required for exercise. It may also be beneficial to make friction mechanism 2300 adjustable. This would give the user a different means for increasing or decreasing the effort required for exercise. By increasing resistance, the experience would be similar to rowing a heavy wooden rowboat. By decreasing the resistance, the experience would be similar to rowing a light weight crew shell. By further reducing the resistance and increasing the gear ratio of the drive system, this machine can allow the user to exercise at a much greater speed than otherwise possible.
The present invention has thus far been described as it relates to a preferred skier embodiment, a preferred bicycle embodiment as well as a preferred rower embodiment. Other human motion simulating machines may be easily designed according to the principles described herein and as such would realistically exhibit the sensation of natural motion. However, rather than describing infinitive machines, the more general design characteristics that may be incorporated within any embodiment will now be discussed.
For example, an important design characteristic of the carriage is the consideration of the momentum exhibited thereby. When using the invention for bicycle riding, for example, in order to properly simulate the ride, the carriage should weigh approximately the same as a standard bicycle so that as it oscillates fore and aft, it will exhibit the same characteristics of a real bicycle. Additionally, the angular momentum carried by the rotating components of the carriage should be equivalent to those on a real bicycle, namely the angular momentum of the bicycle wheels.
A carriage used for simulating bicycle riding will generally use two pedals to drive the system and as such would be considered to be a two way dependant motion system which means that as one pedal is pushed down, the other necessarily comes up, i.e., the motion of one pedal is dependent upon the other. Other human propelled activities may use four way independent motion to propel the user, such as for example, cross-country skiing. In such a situation, the user can propel himself with one limb, or any combination of limbs without depending on the others. In order to properly simulate these, as well as other motions, the carriage can be designed to allow for dependent and/or independent motion.
In order to simulate, for example, bicycle riding, it is important that the carriage is allowed to travel a somewhat linear path. Referring now to
Alternatively, it may be desirable to build a long track for the carriage. Such a design would be particularly beneficial when using multiple machines, side by side, for competition. It may also be beneficial to incorporate a long track with an inclined or declined portion so that, for example, when a user wishes to simulate riding uphill, he moves the carriage to the inclined section of the track.
Another important design characteristic is the amount of rearward force applied to carriage, or forward force when the invention is being used in reverse. On a bicycle, for example, this force is the equivalent to the rearward force applied to a moving bicycle due to wind resistance as well as the resistance between the bicycle tires and the road. The characteristics of this force may vary based on the resistance of the tires on the road, the speed of the bicycle over the road, air resistance, the rider's weight and the momentum of his legs during his pedal strokes. If the user applies a force equal and opposite in direction to this resistive or rearward force, the bicycle will travel at a constant velocity.
One method of providing rearward force is shown in
Another method used in the present invention is demonstrated in
In order to accurately exhibit the force characteristics found in nature, the diameter of the spindle 2700 must be chosen so that if it were allowed to spin at the same rate as the motor shaft, its surface speed would be equivalent to the speed the machine is simulating. In operation, a tether is wrapped around spindle 2700 and attached to the rear of the carriage assembly such that as the spindle turns in the direction of the motor shaft, the tether applies a force to the carriage in a rearward direction. As the motor rotates faster, the spindle 2700 applies increasing rearward force to the carriage. By adjusting knob 2720, the user can create more or less resistance allowing the machine to have the feel of, for example, a mountain bike with low-pressure tires (high resistance) or a racing bike with high-pressure tires (low resistance).
As the user mounts the carriage 1230, his weight (along with the weight of the carriage) forces drive wheel 2740 down against drive element 2760 and against idler 2770. The carriage 1230 is capable of rolling fore and aft on roller bearing 2780 and rail 2790. Drive wheel 2740 and idler 2770 are not fixed in location relative to one another, in other words, as the user mounts the carriage 1230, his weight causes wheel 2740 to compress drive element 2760 onto idler 2770. As a result, the greater the weight, the greater the force applied to the carriage.
Another method for applying rearward force involves using a generator mounted on the carriage designed to engage the dynamic element. For example, if friction element 1270 were replaced with a generator, a fixed or variable load can be placed across the generator to offer greater or lesser force against the dynamic element thereby driving the carriage in the direction of the dynamic element.
Another method for applying rearward force involves using a servo motor and a microprocessor or other control method. The servo motor is attached to the rear of the frame with a tether wrapped around its output shaft and attached to the carriage. The microprocessor directs the servo motor to apply a specified amount of force to the carriage. In this embodiment, it may be desirable to have the user enter his weight so that the microprocessor can accurately calculate the amount of force required.
It may be desirable to incorporate a strain gauge between the carriage and the rearward force device. This would allow for calibration of the invention and would also ensure that similar devices used for competition purposes would be equally matched.
It may also be desirable to simulate the forces caused by wind. For example, as a bicycle rider increases his speed, the apparent wind speed increases, thereby increasing the amount of rearward force on the bike. One way to simulate this effect is to incorporate a variable speed fan at the front of the machine. Another way is to calculate the force effects of wind and incorporate them into the force devices described above.
Another design characteristic involves the control of the speed of the dynamic element of the present invention. When using a motor to drive the dynamic element, a simple potentiometer can be used to adjust and control motor speed.
However, another method involves the use of an “intelligent” speed control system. This involves detecting the fore/aft position of the carriage and adjusting the speed of the dynamic element accordingly. The goal is to have the system speed up the dynamic member as the carriage approaches the front of the base, and slow down and eventually stop the dynamic member as the carriage approaches the back of the base. This way the user can “zone out” and not pay attention to his position on the machine. If he wishes to go faster, he simply speeds up his motions and the machine speeds up to match his pace. Conversely, as the user slows down, the machine slows down. If the user stops, the machine will stop before the carriage reaches the back of the base. This feature has tremendous value for allowing multiple users to compete with one another. The user can constantly change his pace without having to manually interface with the machine.
The goal of the speed control system is to keep the user roughly centered (fore and aft) on the machine. There may be times, however, when it is desirable to bring the user off center. For example, if it is desirable for the user to accelerate, it is best if he begins his acceleration from the back of the machine. As he accelerates, his position will move forward, and until he reaches the front stop, the invention will exhibit the exact characteristics of acceleration.
Detecting the fore/aft position of the carriage can be accomplished in many ways. One method involves the use of a sonic range sensor mounted at the front or rear of the machine. When aimed at the carriage, this device can detect the exact fore/aft location of the carriage and direct the motor speed accordingly. Another method involves running a tether from the carriage to a pulley on the back of the frame, then forward to a pulley on the front of the frame, then around a potentiometer, and back to the carriage. As the carriage moves fore and aft, the potentiometer increases and decreases the speed of the motor.
It may be desirable to allow the machine to be run in a program mode such that the user rides on a predetermined course shown on a display. In this case, the speed control system may automatically vary the speed of the dynamic element so as to change the fore/aft position of the user in anticipation of the user accelerating or decelerating. For example, if the program has a user riding up hill and approaching the top, the speed control system may speed up the dynamic element so that the carriage moves toward the back so that as the user reaches the top of the hill and the terrain becomes level, the user can accelerate without worrying about hitting the front stop.
Similar techniques can be applied toward the non-motorized versions of the invention. If a generator is used to control the dynamic element, a tachometer can be incorporated and used to control a variable load across the generator to maintain a constant speed. Similar to above, this system can also be made “intelligent”. If a flywheel and friction band are used, a tether can be attached to the carriage to control pressure on the friction band such that as the carriage moves rearward, the friction increases, causing the flywheel to slow. Conversely as the carriage moves forward, the friction decreases causing the flywheel to speed up.
While particular embodiments of the invention have been shown and described, it will be obvious to those skilled in the art that changes and modifications may be made therein without departing from the invention in its broader aspects and therefore the purpose of the appended claims is to cover all such changes and modifications as fall within the true spirit and scope of the invention.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3941377||Nov 19, 1974||Mar 2, 1976||Hakon Lie||Apparatus for simulated skiing|
|US4867443||Mar 16, 1988||Sep 19, 1989||Altero Technologies, Inc.||Cross-country skiing simulator|
|US4900013||Jan 27, 1988||Feb 13, 1990||Rodgers Jr Robert E||Exercise apparatus|
|US5192257||Apr 28, 1992||Mar 9, 1993||Fittraxx, Inc.||Exercise apparatus|
|US5277678||Jul 28, 1992||Jan 11, 1994||Fitness Master, Inc.||Video interactive ski exerciser|
|US5328422||Jul 30, 1993||Jul 12, 1994||Nichols Steven M||Ladder-climbing exercise device|
|US5368533||May 13, 1993||Nov 29, 1994||Fittraxx||Quadrilateral exercise apparatus|
|US5407409||Oct 21, 1994||Apr 18, 1995||Tang; Chih-Yun||Exerciser with friction-type resistance device|
|US5429567||Nov 1, 1993||Jul 4, 1995||Stamina Products, Inc.||Cross-country and downhill slalom skiing exercise machine|
|US5792026||Mar 14, 1997||Aug 11, 1998||Maresh; Joseph D.||Exercise method and apparatus|
|US5792029||Feb 21, 1996||Aug 11, 1998||Gordon; Trace||Foot skate climbing simulation exercise apparatus and method|
|US6016002 *||Dec 18, 1997||Jan 18, 2000||Texas Instruments Incorporated||Stacked silicon-controlled rectifier having a low voltage trigger and adjustable holding voltage for ESD protection|
|US6302829||May 29, 1997||Oct 16, 2001||David H. Schmidt||Speed-control exercise method and apparatus|
|US6355959||Sep 11, 2000||Mar 12, 2002||National Semiconductor Corporation||Gate electrode controllable electrostatic discharge (ESD) protection structure having a MOSFET with source and drain regions in separate wells|
|US6433368||Jan 22, 2001||Aug 13, 2002||National Semiconductor Corporation||LVTSCR with a holding voltage that is greater than a DC bias voltage on a to-be-protected node|
|US6541801||Feb 12, 2001||Apr 1, 2003||National Semiconductor Corporation||Triac with a holding voltage that is greater than the dc bias voltages that are on the to-be-protected nodes|
|US6626802 *||Dec 22, 1999||Sep 30, 2003||Robert E. Rodgers, Jr.||Stationary type of exercise apparatus that enables movement of the user's feet in a reciprocating motion|
|US6835167 *||Oct 12, 2001||Dec 28, 2004||David H. Schmidt||Speed-controlled exercise method and apparatus|
|US6855093 *||Jul 12, 2001||Feb 15, 2005||Brunswick Corporation||Stairclimber apparatus pedal mechanism|
|US20040217425 *||Apr 30, 2003||Nov 4, 2004||Texas Instruments Incorporated||Efficient protection structure for reverse pin-to-pin electrostatic discharge|
|1||Wang, Yu, et al.; A true Bicycle Simulator, Design Research Centre. Apr. 2, 2002.|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US7485073 *||Aug 2, 2006||Feb 3, 2009||Horng-Jiun Chang||Muscle exerciser|
|US8680697 *||Nov 20, 2012||Mar 25, 2014||Jasem M. J. Alqanee||Roadway bump electricity generation system|
|US9474928 *||Jan 2, 2015||Oct 25, 2016||Joseph D Maresh||Treadmill with folding overhead handlebar assembly|
|US20080032866 *||Aug 2, 2006||Feb 7, 2008||Horng-Jiun Chang||Muscle exerciser|
|US20080161168 *||Dec 28, 2006||Jul 3, 2008||Shih-Wen Hsiao||Power generating structure of an exerciser|
|US20110028278 *||Jun 8, 2010||Feb 3, 2011||Roach Matthew D||Dynamic Rowing Machine|
|US20130127176 *||Nov 20, 2012||May 23, 2013||Jasem M.J. Alqanee||Roadway bump electricity generation system|
|US20130296137 *||Jan 21, 2011||Nov 7, 2013||Shenzhen Antuoshan Special Machine & Electrical Co., Ltd.||Exercise rowing machine with power generation|
|US20140274574 *||Mar 14, 2014||Sep 18, 2014||Icon Health & Fitness, Inc.||Exercise apparatus comprising adjustable foot pads and related methods|
|US20160067537 *||Nov 13, 2015||Mar 10, 2016||Woodway Usa, Inc.||Power generating manually operated treadmill|
|U.S. Classification||482/70, 482/51|
|International Classification||A63B22/00, A63B69/18, A63B22/08, A63B21/015, A63B69/00, A63B21/005, A63B21/22, A63B21/00, A63B22/20, A63B21/02, A63B23/04, A63B22/02, A63B23/035, A63B1/00|
|Cooperative Classification||A63B21/4001, A63B22/0017, A63B21/4045, A63B21/00069, A63B21/015, A63B2022/0038, A63B22/001, A63B21/154, A63B2022/0041, A63B21/0058, A63B21/157, A63B69/06, A63B22/0242, A63B23/03541, A63B22/02, A63B21/012, A63B22/00, A63B21/023, A63B22/0012, A63B2024/0093, A63B2208/0204, A63B21/225, A63B2220/13, A63B23/0417, A63B2071/025, A63B69/16, A63B22/203, A63B22/205, A63B23/03525, A63B21/153, A63B69/182, A63B22/0023, A63B71/0054, A63B23/03508, A63B23/0355, A63B69/0028, A63B22/0605|
|European Classification||A63B23/035F, A63B21/14A, A63B22/00A6S, A63B21/15G, A63B23/035C2, A63B21/15F4, A63B21/15F6, A63B21/012, A63B22/02, A63B23/035C4S, A63B21/02B, A63B69/18C, A63B21/22F, A63B21/005F, A63B21/015, A63B22/00, A63B69/00J, A63B23/04B2, A63B22/08, A63B22/20T2, A63B22/00A6, A63B22/20T4|
|Aug 16, 2010||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|Jul 25, 2014||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 8
|Mar 10, 2017||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: SCHMIDT DESIGN, LLC, CONNECTICUT
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:SCHMIDT, DAVID H;REEL/FRAME:041534/0710
Effective date: 20170218