|Publication number||US7183771 B2|
|Application number||US 10/980,690|
|Publication date||Feb 27, 2007|
|Filing date||Nov 3, 2004|
|Priority date||Sep 9, 2002|
|Also published as||CA2584585A1, CA2584585C, CN101069105A, CN101069105B, EP1810058A2, EP1810058A4, US20050088180, WO2006052458A2, WO2006052458A3|
|Publication number||10980690, 980690, US 7183771 B2, US 7183771B2, US-B2-7183771, US7183771 B2, US7183771B2|
|Inventors||William D. Flanagan|
|Original Assignee||Ultima Labs, Inc.|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (15), Referenced by (3), Classifications (8), Legal Events (4)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
This application is a continuation-in-part application of my presently application Ser. No. 10/237,439, filed on 9 Sep. 2002 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,822,455.
This invention relates to the field of well logging. More specifically, the invention relates to a novel apparatus and techniques for eliminating data acquisition errors inherent in electromagnetic propagation wave devices. The invention also relates to an apparatus and method for measuring the resistivity of geologic formations surrounding a borehole during well logging and logging while drilling operations.
Formation resistivity is commonly used to evaluate geologic formations surrounding a borehole. Formation resistivity indicates the presence of hydrocarbons in the geologic formations. Porous formations having high resistivity generally indicate that they are predominantly saturated with hydrocarbons, while porous formations with low resistivity indicate that such formations are predominantly saturated with water.
Devices have been previously developed for measuring formation resistivity. Many of these devices measure formation resistivity by measuring the properties of propagating electromagnetic waves. For example,
Although borehole compensated tools provide a more accurate measurement of formation resistivity than conventional uncompensated tools, such technique requires a tool approximately twice as long as an uncompensated tool. Tool length for an uncompensated tool with a single radial depth of investigation is directly related to the spacings between the transmitter and receiver pair. Longer spacings between the transmitter and receiver pair provide greater depth of investigation than shorter spacing and require a longer tool body accordingly. The tool length for a borehole compensated tool as described in patents '045 and '940 with an equivalent radial depth of investigation as an uncompensated tool will be approximately twice as long because of the requirement of both upper and lower transmitter elements.
Another compensated tool was described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,594,343 to Clark et al. (1997) wherein the transmitters were asymmetrically located on both sides of a receiver pair. Similar to the '045 and '940 patents previously described, such tool also required placement of at least one transmitter on each side of the receiver pair and also required a long tool body.
The compensated tools described above require a long tool body in the borehole to correctly position the transmitters and receivers. Long well tools not only require additional material and cost more to manufacture but they are more likely to bind or stick in narrow or deviated boreholes. This problem is particularly acute in multilateral wellbores having a reduced entry radius and in highly deviated wellbores. Accordingly, a need exists for an improved system with reduced cost that is also capable of facilitating tool movement within a wellbore while gathering useful information regarding geologic formation characteristics such as resistivity and other geologic formation indicators.
The invention provides a system for evaluating a geologic formation property proximate to a borehole through such formation. The system comprises a tool body moveable through the borehole, a first transmitter engaged with the tool body for generating a signal into the geologic formation, a second transmitter engaged with the tool body proximate to the first transmitter for generating a signal into the geologic formation, a first receiver engaged with the tool body for receiving signals generated by the first and second transmitters, and a second receiver engaged with the tool body proximate to the first receiver for receiving signals generated by the first and second transmitters.
Another embodiment of the invention provides an apparatus comprising a tool body moveable through the borehole, a first transmitter engaged with the tool body for generating an electromagnetic wave into the geologic formation, a second transmitter engaged with the tool body proximate to the first transmitter for generating an electromagnetic wave into the geologic formation, a first receiver engaged with the tool body for receiving electromagnetic wave energy generated by the first and second transmitters and for generating electrical signals representing the electromagnetic wave energy, a second receiver engaged with the tool body proximate to the first receiver for receiving electromagnetic wave energy generated by the first and second transmitters and for generating electrical signals representing the electromagnetic wave energy, and a controller for processing the electrical signals generated by the first and second receivers.
The method of the invention comprises the steps of deploying a tool body in the borehole, of generating electromagnetic wave energy from the first transmitter at a selected location in the borehole, of generating electromagnetic wave energy from the second transmitter at a selected location in the borehole, of operating the first and second receivers in response to the electromagnetic wave energy generated by the first and second transmitters to generate electrical signals representing the electromagnetic wave energy, and of transmitting said electrical signals to the controller.
In a second preferred embodiment herein disclosed, a method and device for evaluating a geologic formation property proximate to a borehole intersecting such formation is disclosed. The method comprises providing a device within the borehole, with the device comprising a first transmitter, located on the device, for transmitting a signal into the geologic formation; a first and second receiver located on the device, for receiving the transmitted signal; and, a processor means for processing the receiver signals.
The method includes generating a signal from the transmitter into the geologic formation and receiving the transmitted signal at the first and second receivers. The method further includes injecting a calibration signal with a calibration circuit into the first receiver and the second receiver and processing the received signal from the geologic formation and the calibration signal within the processor means. The method includes correcting errors related to the first and second receiver elements of the system and determining the resistivity measurement.
In one preferred embodiment, the step of processing the uncalibrated receiver signal and the calibration signal comprises measuring the phase difference of the uncalibrated signal provided by the first receiver and the second receiver. Also, in one preferred embodiment, the step of processing the uncalibrated receiver signals and the calibration signal includes calculating a phase difference free of data acquiring errors by computing the phase difference as follows:
The calibration signal, in one embodiment, is at a first frequency and the receiver signal is at the first frequency and the method further comprises time multiplexing the uncalibrated receiver signal with the calibration signal. The step of time multiplexing may be accomplished by sequentially activating the transmitter and then the calibration circuits.
Additionally, a second embodiment comprises a frequency domain multiplexing scheme and the method may further comprise separating the calibration signal from the received signal by providing a difference in frequency with a frequency domain multiplexing circuit operatively associated with the processor means.
In one preferred embodiment, the frequency difference is selected as follows:
According to the teachings of the present invention, the calibration signals may be injected into the front end of the receiver elements thereby adding the calibration signal in series with the receiving elements.
In one preferred embodiment, the calibration signal is injected into the receiver front ends using a current loop, and wherein the current loop has a current transformer placed therein and the method further includes sampling the current in the loop with a current sampling resistor.
Also, the device may be provided with a third receiver and the method further comprises injecting the calibration signal into the third receiver. The method may further comprise computing a differential calibration quantity for the first receiver and the second receiver, computing the differential calibration quantity for the second receiver and the third receiver, and, computing the differential calibration quantity for the first receiver and the third receiver.
A device for obtaining a resistivity measurement of a subterranean geologic formation is also disclosed. The subterranean geologic formation is intersected by a borehole. The device includes a transmitter for transmitting a signal into the geologic formation, a first and second receiver for receiving the transmitted signal, and means for injecting a calibration signal into the first receiver and the second receiver. The device may further comprise means for processing the uncalibrated receiver signal and the calibration signal to obtain the resistivity measurement.
The processor means may include a receiver data acquisition circuit for correcting data acquisition errors related to the first and second receivers.
In one embodiment, the signal injecting means includes applying the calibrated signal in series with the first receiver and the second receiver. The device may be provided with a third receiver and the device further comprises means for injecting the calibration signal into the third receiver. The device may further comprise means for computing a differential calibration quantity for the first receiver and the second receiver; means for computing a differential calibration quantity for the second receiver and the third receiver; and, means for computing a differential calibration quantity for the first receiver and the third receiver.
In one preferred embodiment, the processing means further comprises means for measuring a phase difference between the first receiver and the second receiver free of errors. The phase difference measuring means computes the phase difference as follows:
In one embodiment, the calibration signal is at a first frequency and the receiver signal is at the first frequency and the device further comprises means, operatively associated with the processing means, for time multiplexing the uncalibrated receiver signal with the calibration signal. The time multiplexing means includes means for sequentially activating the transmitter and a calibration signal injecting circuit operatively associated with the processing means.
The device may further comprise a frequency domain multiplexing means for separating the calibration signal from the received formation signal by a difference in frequency. The frequency difference of the separating means is selected as follows:
In one preferred embodiment, the frequency domain multiplexing means cancels out the received formation signal while processing the calibration signal, and cancels out the calibration signal while processing the received formation signal.
Additionally, the calibration signals may be injected into the first receiver and the second receiver front ends using a current loop. The current loop may contain a current transformer placed therein and the device further includes means for sampling the current in the loop with a current sampling resistor.
An advantage of the present invention includes that the device and method provides a means to correct, in real time, data acquisition errors of propagation wave devices that use multiple receivers to measure propagation parameters such as attenuation and phase difference.
Another advantage of the present invention is that the disclosed calibration method is less complex as compared to other methods that use depth alignment of similar propagation measurements to determine errors introduced by the receiver data acquisition electronics.
Yet another advantage is a simpler calibration method that requires no borehole depth information. Another advantage is the elimination of errors related to the time drift of electronic parameters. Still yet, another advantage is the downhole computation in real time of calibrated dual-receiver propagation measurements.
The invention provides a unique propagation wave resistivity system. The system is capable of providing two depths of investigation as shown in
Property P11 illustrates the electromagnetic property of the propagation path from first transmitter Tx1 to first receiver Rx1. Property P12 illustrates the electromagnetic property of the propagation path from first transmitter Tx1 to second receiver Rx2. Similar properties are illustrated for second transmitter Tx2, wherein property P21 illustrates the propagation path from second transmitter Tx2 to first receiver Rx1, and P22 illustrates the propagation path from second transmitter Tx2 to second receiver Rx2.
Tool 10 provides two differential measurements (MRS and MRL) from receiver pair 16. MRS is derived from receiver pair 16 using short-spaced transmitter Tx2 and MRL is derived from receiver pair 16 using long-spaced transmitter Tx1. Both of these measurements can be converted to resistivity with functions f and g.
In addition to the two dual-receiver measurements (MRS and MRL), two additional differential measurements (MTS and MTL) can be made from transmitter pair 14. MTS is derived from transmitter pair 14 using short-spaced receiver Tx2, and MTL is derived from transmitter pair 14 using long spaced transmitter Tx1. If the spacing between transmitter pair 14 is equal to the spacing of receiver pair 16, the functions to convert the dual-transmitter measurements, MTS and MTL, into resistivity can be the same functions (f and g) for the dual-receiver measurements from receiver pair 16.
One advantage of this inventive embodiment over a standard borehole compensated device shown in
As shown in
The reduction of borehole rugosity effects provided with this compensation is illustrated in
In addition to borehole rugosity effects, the compensated apparatus illustrated in
This asymmetrical vertical response effect can be explained by examining the uncompensated measurements from receiver pair 16. As receiver pair 16 of the device enters a resistive bed boundary from the top the respective transmitter has already penetrated the bed. At this position, a larger portion of the propagating electromagnetic wave is contained in the resistive bed. The opposite happens at the bottom bed boundary as the respective transmitter is no longer embedded in the resistive bed as receiver pair 16 transverses the lower bed boundary. In this manner a smaller portion of the propagating electromagnetic wave is contained the resistive bed at this position, and this geometrical effect causes the resistivity log to have a different shape at the top and bottom of formation bed boundaries. By using both receiver pair 16 and transmitter pair 14 measurements, the effects of this vertical response asymmetry are averaged to provide a measurement responding to bed boundaries in a consistent symmetrical fashion regardless of the tool geometry as the tool traverses the bed boundary. The symmetrical response provided by this compensation scheme is shown in
Receiver and transmitter errors (removed with a standard borehole compensated tool) are still present. The dual-receiver measurements from receiver pair 16 contain receiver errors and the dual-transmitter measurements from transmitter pair 14 contains transmitter errors, however such errors can be compensated with electronic features incorporated in the design of the apparatus as described later in this document.
One embodiment of a depth-offset compensated propagation wave resistivity tool 20 is shown in
As described above the transmitters are located below the receivers. However, configurations placing the receivers below the transmitters can be used and will have the same response as a device positioning the transmitters below the receivers. Placement of the transmitters and receivers above or below the other depends on the desired implementation.
The method of depth-offset compensation previously described can be extended to other possible tool layouts by properly aligning in depth the dual-receiver and dual-transmitter data of equal spacing. The total number of different depths of investigation provided by this method is equal to the total number of unique transmitter to receiver-pair spacings (NTRR). A block diagram of a 3-transmitter, 3-receiver version of a depth-offset compensated propagation wave resistivity tool 30 is illustrated in
Acquisition controller and processor block 36 directs the sequencing and timing of the acquisition electronics and also acquires and processes the measurement data. An interface to accept commands from and pass data to the user is also provided by block 36. Such an interface can connect to a telemetry system (not shown) to provide a means to acquire and transmit data in real time such as in the determination of formation resistivity while drilling.
Although depth-offset compensation reduces the effect of borehole rugosity and provides a symmetrical vertical response, the electronic errors associated with the transmitters and receivers preferably use an additional compensation method. This electronic compensation method involves measuring the transmitter errors directly with an electronic circuit and calculating the receiver errors by depth aligning and comparing equivalent propagation measurements from different transmitter-receiver pairs. This process is illustrated in
A 11 =E Tx1 +P11A +E Rx1,
A 21 =E Tx2 +P21A +E Rx1,
where ETx1 and ETx2 are the errors associated with transmitters Tx1 and Tx2 respectively and ERx1 is the error associated with receiver Rx1. The dual transmitter propagation measurement for Tx1 and Tx2 using Rx1 can be written as
M TM =A21−A11=(E Tx2 +P21A +E Rx1)−(E Tx1 +P11A +E Rx1)
M TM=(P21A −P11A)+(E Tx2 −E Tx1). (1)
The quantity (P21 A−P11 A) is the differential propagation property to be measured without error. Error associated with receiver Rx1 cancels and the error remaining, (ETx2−ETx1), is due to transmitters Tx1 and TX2. In this example, MTM is the medium-spaced differential propagation measurement. Similar derivations of the short-spaced, MTS and long-spaced, MTL, dual-transmitter propagation measurements can be made. MTS and MTL can be written as
M TS =A31−A 21=( P31A —P21A)+(E Tx3 −E Tx2) (2)
M TL =A23−A 13=( P23A −P13A)+(E Tx2 −E Tx1). (3)
As shown in equations 1, 2 and 3, the errors in MTS, MTM and MTL are all differential transmitter errors.
These differential transmitter errors are directly measured in the tool by sampling the transmitter current 46 and the transmitter voltage 48 and by deriving correction factors for data acquired with each transmitter pair 14. Outputs from transmitter sense circuit 50 are treated in a similar fashion to the receiver signals and passed to analog-to-digital converter 44. The differential transmitter errors are then calculated by forming the difference of certain characteristics of the sampled transmitter signals. For instance, the differential transmitter phase errors can be calculated from the phase difference of the sampled signals and the differential transmitter attenuation errors can be calculated from the difference of the amplitudes of the sampled transmitter signals. Since these transmitter sense outputs are processed with the same circuits, any systematic errors associated with the acquisition circuits are removed when these differential corrections are calculated. After the differential transmitters errors have been calculated from the sampled transmitter signals such errors can be subtracted from MTS, MTM and MTL to remove errors associated with the transmitter elements of the system.
In a similar manner, expressions for the dual-receiver propagation measurements can be derived. Referring to
A 22 =E Tx2 +P22A +E Rx2,
A 21 =E Tx2 +P21A +E Rx1.
The dual-receiver propagation measurement, MRM, can then be written as
MRM =A21−A 22=( E Tx2 +P21A +E Rx1)−(E Tx2 +P22A +E Rx2)
M RM=(P21A−P22A)+(E Rx1 −E Rx2). (4)
Similar derivations of the short-spaced, MRS and long-spaced, MRL, dual-receiver propagation measurements can be made. MRS and MRL can be written as
M RS=(P31A−P32A)+(E Rx1 −E Rx2). (5)
M RL=(P12A−P13A)+(E Rx2 −E Rx3). (6)
As shown in equations 4, 5 and 6, the errors in MRS, MRM and MRL are all differential receiver errors.
The differential receiver errors can be determined with the use of the transmitter error measurements described above and with a process that involves depth aligning and comparing equivalent propagation measurements from different transmitter-receiver pairs. Referring again to
A 11 =E Tx1 +P11A +E Rx1.
Similarly, the expression for B22 can be written as
B22=E Tx2 +P22B +E Rx2,
Forming the difference of A11 and B22 results in
A11−B22=(E Tx1 +P11A +E Rx1)−(E Tx2 +P22B +E Rx2)
which simplifies to
A11−B22=(E Rx1 −E Rx2)+(E Tx1 −E Tx2)+(P11A −P22B).
The term (P11 A−P22 B) is equal to zero since the propagation paths are identical. This permits the differential receiver error to be expressed as
(E Rx1 −E Rx2)=(A11−B22)+(E Tx2 −E Tx1)
Similarly, the remaining differential receiver error can be expressed as
(E Rx2−ERx3)=(A22−B33)+(E Tx3 −E Tx2).
The invention permits determination of all four of the required differential measurement errors, including the two differential-transmitter measurement errors and the two differential-receiver measurement errors. With the differential errors defined, the differential-transmitter errors can be subtracted from the appropriate dual-transmitter measurements, MTS, MTM and MTL and the differential-receiver errors from the appropriate dual-receiver measurements, MRS, MRM and MRL, thereby providing propagation measurements free of the errors associated with the transmitter and receiver elements of the system.
Other differential errors can be identified, such as the differential receiver error (ERx1−ERx2) derived from the measurements A11 and B22. An alternate relationship using A21 and B32 can be used to obtain another expression for (ERx1−ERx2) as follows:
(E Rx1 −E Rx2)=(A21−B32)+(E Tx3 −E Tx2).
Similar alternate versions of (ERx2−ERx3) can also be derived, thereby reducing noise in the differential errors by averaging all of the possible determinations of each differential error. In addition, noise in the differential errors can be further reduced by averaging the determined values over depth since they will not vary directly as a function of depth. This occurs because the primary mechanism for causing drifts in the differential errors is time, temperature or pressure and not depth.
The controller is capable of producing a compensated resistivity measurement of the geologic formation by averaging uncompensated dual-receiver resistivity measurements with uncompensated dual-transmitter resistivity measurements of the geologic formation taken from two selected locations within the borehole. This averaging provides a compensated resistivity measurement with symmetrical vertical response and reduced effects from borehole rugosity. The controller can also be capable of producing a compensated resistivity measurement of the geologic formation by averaging dual-receiver propagation measurements (such as attenuation and phase difference) with dual-transmitter propagation measurements of the geologic formation taken from two selected locations within the borehole. This averaging results in a compensated resistivity measurement with a symmetrical vertical response and reduced effects from borehole rugosity.
Compensation of errors from the transmitting and receiving elements of the system can be made by measuring currents and voltages generated by first and second transmitters, by measuring currents and voltages of the electrical signals generated by the first and second receivers, and by operating the controller to derive corrections for the transmitter propagation errors from the differences between such current and voltage measurements. In addition, the controller can be operated to derive receiver propagation errors from the corrections for the transmitter propagation errors and from depth aligned receiver propagation measurements.
The invention has significant advantages over prior art tools. Such advantages include a shorter tool length, multiple depths of investigation with fewer antennas, compensation for the asymmetrical vertical response of electromagnetic wave tools, compensation for borehole rugosity effects, and compensation for the errors caused by the transmitter and receiver elements of the apparatus.
Hence, compensation of the data acquisition errors associated with the dual-transmitter measurements are removed with electronic circuits that measure the transmitter current and voltage. The data acquisition errors associated with the dual-receiver measurements are removed by making use of the electronic transmitter error compensation and by deriving correction factors from the data acquired with each receiver. This receiver error compensation process requires, as previously described, a technique of depth alignment of similar propagation measurements to determine errors introduced by the receiver data acquisition electronics.
In a second embodiment, which is the preferred embodiment of this application, an apparatus and method to correct, in real time, data acquisition errors of propagation wave devices that use multiple receivers to measure propagation parameters such as attenuation and phase difference, will be described with reference to
Referring now to
The operation of the resistivity device 60 is similar to the operation of the resistivity tool 30 discussed in relation to
The receivers Rx1, Rx2 receive the signal that has propagated from the transmitter, Tx. This signal is then communicated to the amplifier and data acquisition electronic means 66, 68, respectively. As noted earlier, the calibration signal injection circuits 62, 64 has injected the calibration signal into the front-ends of receivers Rx1, Rx2. The data acquisition electronics 66, 68 will measure both the received signal and the calibration signal, which in turn will be communicated to the acquisition controller and processor 76. The acquisition controller and processor 76 will compute the phase difference, and in turn compute resistivity.
To illustrate the method used to remove the data acquisition errors, the measurement of the dual-receiver phase difference will be presented. θRx1 and θRx2 represent the true phase of the received signals from antennas Rx1 and Rx2. Also, φE1 represents the phase errors introduced by the acquisition electronics of Rx1 and φE2 represent the phase errors introduced by the acquisition electronics of Rx2. The resulting measured phases can then be expressed as
The dual-receiver phase difference measurement is computed by forming the difference
Rewriting PDuc we get
PD uc=(θRx1−θRx2)+(φE1−φE2) (7)
As shown in the above equation, the measured phase difference, PDuc, contains an error term associated with the phase errors introduced by the acquisition electronics of Rx1 and Rx2. PDuc is the un-calibrated phase-difference measurement.
Letting θCal represent the phase of the calibration signal, the measured phase of the injected calibration signal can be expressed as
We can then use the measured calibration phases to correct for the errors, φE1 and φE2, introduced into the dual-receiver phase difference measurement.
As shown in the above equation (8), PD is free of the errors associated with the acquisition electronics. Also, the above equation shows how the quantity, θCal, cancels out indicating the value of θCal does not need to be known in order to remove the acquisition electronic errors from the phase difference measurement.
Although the above example illustrates how the apparatus and method can be applied to the phase-difference propagation measurement, the same technique can be applied to other propagation measurements. For instance, the dual-receiver attenuation measurement can be calibrated using the same process. The method is identical to the phase-difference calibration method except for the substitution of the signal phases with the corresponding signal amplitude levels expressed in decibels. The relationships for the attenuation example are as follows:
AT=(A M1 −A M2)−(A MC1 −A MC2),
AT=(A Rx1 −A Rx2)+(A E1 −A E2)−(A MC1 −A MC2)
AT=(A Rx1 −A Rx2)+(A E1 −A E2)−((A Cal +A E1)−(A Cal +A E2))
AT=(A Rx1 −A Rx2) (9)
According to the teachings to the teachings of this invention, there are at least two ways that the calibration signal can be injected and measured. The first is time-multiplexing. If the frequency of the calibration signal is selected to be exactly the same as the frequency of the received signal, the two signals will interfere with each other if the calibration signal is injected when the received signal is present. The acquisition controller can overcome signal interference by time-multiplexing the received signal with the calibration signal. This is accomplished by having the acquisition controller sequentially activate the transmitter and then the calibration signal circuits. This provides a time-multiplexed series of received data with calibration data.
A second method that could be used is frequency domain multiplexing. The method separates the calibration signal from the received signal by a small difference in frequency. As long as the frequency difference is selected to be
ΔF=N/t a, (10)
where N is an integer and ta is the acquisition time interval, the two signals can be processed independently. Forcing ΔF by the above constraint insures that the received signal can be exactly canceled out while processing the calibration signal and the calibration signal can be exactly canceled out while processing the received signal. Making ΔF small insures that the acquisition electronic errors that affect the received signal can be accurately measured by the calibration signal. For example, if the received signal is assumed to be at 2.00 MHz, and the acquisition time interval is 1.0 second, ΔF can be equal to 10 Hz. This would place the calibration signal at 2.000010 MHz and the received signal at 2.000000 MHz. At this relatively small frequency separation, the electronic errors measured with the calibration signal would accurately reflect the errors introduced into the received signal.
One important aspect of the apparatus used for the calibration is the differential accuracy of the injected calibration signals. That is, there needs to be very small differences or known and stable differences in the calibration signals injected into each receiver. Any unaccounted differences between the two calibration signals will result in errors in the final propagation measurement. For example, in the case of the phase-difference measurement, the phase of the injected calibration signal into Rx1 has to be equal to the phase of the injected calibration signal into Rx2. If there are any phase differences in the two calibrations signals, these differences must be known and unchanging. As a result, the implementation of the calibration apparatus is important.
Referring now to
This disclosure has discussed the application of this invention to a device with two receivers. However, both the apparatus and method can be extended to any device with more than two receivers. For example, the invention can be applied to a device with three receivers (as seen in
and N equals the total number of receivers.
Although the invention has been described in terms of certain preferred embodiments, it will become apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art than modifications and improvement can be made to the inventive concepts herein within departing from the scope of the invention. The embodiments shown herein are merely illustrative of the inventive concepts and should not be interpreted as limiting the scope of the invention.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US4451789||Sep 28, 1981||May 29, 1984||Nl Industries, Inc.||Logging tool and method for measuring resistivity of different radial zones at a common depth of measurement|
|US4609873||Jan 4, 1980||Sep 2, 1986||Texaco Inc.||Dielectric well logging system with at least three transmitter coils and at least two receiver coils for determining resistivity and dielectric constant of a subsurface formation adjacent a fluid invaded zone of the formation|
|US4613821 *||Jan 10, 1983||Sep 23, 1986||Conoco Inc.||Method and apparatus for obtaining high accuracy simultaneous calibration of signal measuring systems|
|US4949045||Jun 20, 1989||Aug 14, 1990||Schlumberger Technology Corporation||Well logging apparatus having a cylindrical housing with antennas formed in recesses and covered with a waterproof rubber layer|
|US4968940||Jun 20, 1989||Nov 6, 1990||Schlumberger Technology Corporation||Well logging apparatus and method using two spaced apart transmitters with two receivers located between the transmitters|
|US5260660 *||Sep 25, 1992||Nov 9, 1993||Stolar, Inc.||Method for calibrating a downhole receiver used in electromagnetic instrumentation for detecting an underground conductor|
|US5594343||Dec 2, 1994||Jan 14, 1997||Schlumberger Technology Corporation||Well logging apparatus and method with borehole compensation including multiple transmitting antennas asymmetrically disposed about a pair of receiving antennas|
|US6184685||Feb 22, 1999||Feb 6, 2001||Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.||Mulitiple spacing resistivity measurements with receiver arrays|
|US6304086||Sep 7, 1999||Oct 16, 2001||Schlumberger Technology Corporation||Method and apparatus for evaluating the resistivity of formations with high dip angles or high-contrast thin layers|
|US6353321||Jan 27, 2000||Mar 5, 2002||Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.||Uncompensated electromagnetic wave resistivity tool for bed boundary detection and invasion profiling|
|US6476609||Jul 13, 2000||Nov 5, 2002||Dresser Industries, Inc.||Electromagnetic wave resistivity tool having a tilted antenna for geosteering within a desired payzone|
|US6538447||Dec 13, 2000||Mar 25, 2003||Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.||Compensated multi-mode elctromagnetic wave resistivity tool|
|US6541979||Dec 19, 2000||Apr 1, 2003||Schlumberger Technology Corporation||Multi-coil electromagnetic focusing methods and apparatus to reduce borehole eccentricity effects|
|US6603312 *||Dec 11, 2000||Aug 5, 2003||Cbg Corporation||Multi-frequency array induction tool|
|US20060017442 *||Jul 23, 2004||Jan 26, 2006||Baker Hughes Incorporated||Error correction and calibration of a deep reading propagation resistivity tool|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US8854045||Jul 11, 2012||Oct 7, 2014||Pico Technologies Llc||Electronics for a thin bed array induction logging system|
|US9506326||Jul 11, 2013||Nov 29, 2016||Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.||Rotationally-independent wellbore ranging|
|EP2872931A4 *||Jul 8, 2013||Jul 20, 2016||Pico Technologies Llc||Electronics for a thin bed array induction logging system|
|International Classification||G01V3/12, G01V1/44|
|Cooperative Classification||G01V13/00, G01V3/30|
|European Classification||G01V3/30, G01V13/00, G01V1/44|
|Nov 3, 2004||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: ULTIMA LABS, INC., TEXAS
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:FLANAGAN. WILLIAM D.;REEL/FRAME:015966/0824
Effective date: 20041029
|Aug 27, 2010||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|Aug 6, 2014||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 8
|Aug 6, 2014||SULP||Surcharge for late payment|
Year of fee payment: 7