|Publication number||US7184787 B2|
|Application number||US 10/165,430|
|Publication date||Feb 27, 2007|
|Filing date||Jun 6, 2002|
|Priority date||Jun 6, 2002|
|Also published as||US20030228874|
|Publication number||10165430, 165430, US 7184787 B2, US 7184787B2, US-B2-7184787, US7184787 B2, US7184787B2|
|Inventors||Michael J. Mallette|
|Original Assignee||Sun Microsystems, Inc.|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (9), Referenced by (2), Classifications (12), Legal Events (4)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates primarily to the field of concentrators, and in particular to a method and apparatuses for a wireless console/control concentrator.
Portions of the disclosure of this patent document contain material that is subject to copyright protection. The copyright owner has no objection to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the patent document or the patent disclosure, as it appears in the Patent and Trademark Office file or records, but otherwise reserves all rights whatsoever.
2. Background Art
In modern computing, devices like a group of computers share the same common resources or hardware devices in order to access the Internet, for example to browse the World Wide Web, to retrieve and send email, to chat, or to share a network, for example a Local Area Network/Wide Area Network (LAN/WAN). Some of these common resources include concentrators, routers, bridges, LAN/WAN connections, etc. A group of computers may also share other hardware devices like printers, facsimile machines, etc. In order to understand why devices and resources have to be shared, we have to first look at the changing nature of computing, and the implications thereof on layouts of computers in a shared environment like a computer lab, or business office.
Nature of Computing
The nature of computing is changing. Until recently, modem computing was mostly “machine-centric”, where a user accessed a dedicated computer at a single location. The dedicated computer had all the data and computer programs necessary for the user to operate the computer, and ideally, it had large amounts of hardware, such as disk drives, memory, processors, and the like. With the advent of computing networks, however, not only different computers but also different computer layouts have become more desirable and the focus of computing has become “service-oriented”. In particular computer networks allow a user to access data and computer programs that exist elsewhere in the network. When the user accesses such data or computer programs, the remote computer is said to be providing a service to the user. With the improvement in services and hardware devices available to users, the need to have a dedicated computer following the machine-centric paradigm is greatly reduced.
A console/control concentrator is a hardware device that typically has many physical wire/fiber connections of the same type to devices within a very localized environment such as a computer rack or to those devices within a given short distance from the concentrator. It then relays data to and from these many localized hardwired devices (typically lower bandwidth, limited distance, and limited utilization) to typically (though not necessarily) a similar concentrator by multiplexing the data over a single (dual for redundancy) higher bandwidth line (typically connects to a LAN for greater distance). This allows installation and arrangement of many devices to be simplified by only having to make one or (two for redundancy) connections over a great distance instead of perhaps hundreds. Protocol conversion and routing can take place within a concentrator to allow for the multiplexing.
Present devices such as computers operating under various operating systems, and various communication protocols are hard-wired to a console/control concentrator. This is illustrated in
Since several computers share the same resources or devices, they do not have to be close to each other, or to the shared devices, especially if they are hard-wired to each other. But, there may be a tangled maze of wires to and from these shared devices to the computers. For example, several computers from different parts of an office may be wired to a single common printer residing in one location of the office. Certain other wire connections are unavoidable, for example, the power cord from each device to the power outlet, or the console (monitor) connection to the computer tower. The present inventor has shown how these wire connections may be organized to a certain extent; especially for a room full of devices stacked one on top of another in rows of racks. A complete description of organizing and operating wires for rack systems are contained in co-pending U.S. patent application “Method and Apparatus For Efficient Electronics Positioning And Connection Systems”, Ser. No. 09/784, 470, filed on Feb. 15, 2001, and assigned to the assignee of this patent application.
Prior Art Limitations
Existing console/control concentrators have a limited number of physical connections which; to a certain extent, is dictated by the size of the physical connector used, and the room needed to facilitate plugging and unplugging the physical connectors. This necessitates using many more concentrators thereby increasing the size and complexity of the job of wiring, configuring, documenting, labeling, and maintaining these many connections. Given the nature of console/control traffic, the vast majority of these connections will sit idle at any given time, meaning this hardware is for the most part underutilized.
The control ports of existing devices are usually either serial or Ethernet. Some devices have both types of access available. There are at least four different style connectors for serial and three different styles for Ethernet excluding fiber. These differences mean you will have to use adapters to compensate for the differences. Regardless, concentrators cannot work for both serial and Ethernet. They must be made for one or the other.
With current prior art there is a need to document each line with an ID tag on both ends as well as the need to document the layout of these wire connections in a network diagram. This documentation is updated manually in a documentation database as well as in an online configuration database. Because this process is manual and not automatic there is a great chance that the database will fall out of date with the actual configuration. This database could hold at a minimum the concentrator and device hostnames and the concentrator and device locations. Also, with prior art there is no means by which a computer room layout could be made self-documenting.
The present invention provides a method and apparatuses for a wireless console/control concentrator and associated hardware devices utilizing a location based dynamic coordinate addressing network over a programmable pulse modulated RF transceiver such as, for example, Time Modulated—Ultra Wideband (TM-UWB™). In one embodiment, the physical wire connections present in prior art between a device console port and a concentrator are replaced with wireless connections. This replacement involves retrofitting hardware on existing device consoles, building new devices with the wireless console/control hardware built-in, creation of a new wireless console/control concentrator, the three reference stations for PLT (positioning, location, tracking), and creation of the software programs that takes care of handling wireless communication and mapping of devices to their locations. In another embodiment, the concentrator acts as an intelligent router with its own built-in query/control language for configuration and use. In another embodiment, once the concentrator and a list of reference stations have been configured with their coordinates, and a coverage coordinate map is built, the concentrator can dynamically add new console/control points of presence (devices) within its designated range of coverage. In another embodiment, the concentrator communicates with a network terminal server over a dedicated wired/fiber network link. This terminal server can also serve as a network configuration control application software server, security and audit software application server,
In yet another embodiment, once a connection has been established between a console and a console/control concentrator, it remains open until one of the following occur: the concentrator is rebooted or refreshed, the device side communicator reboots or re-establishes the connection, the console connection is dropped from the terminal server, or the device makes contact with an override connection which can either be a physical console port connection or a wireless port connection made from within a prescribed radius suitable for a maintenance console.
These and other features, aspects and advantages of the present invention will become better understood with regard to the following description, appended claims and accompanying drawings where:
The invention is a method and apparatuses for a wireless console/control concentrator utilizing a location based dynamic coordinate addressing network over a programmable pulse modulated wireless transceiver such as, for example, TM-UWB™. In the following description, numerous specific details are set forth to provide a more thorough description of embodiments of the invention. It is apparent, however, to one skilled in the art, that the invention may be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well known features have not been described in detail so as not to obscure the invention.
Wireless Console/Control Concentrator
Consoles and other devices that share common resources like a network, for example the Internet, a Local Area Network (LAN), a Wide Area Network (WAN), or other devices like printers and facsimile machines, etc., are connected to each other via concentrators that act as forwarding agents and device location identifiers. Wireless concentrators are similar to the ones currently available, with one difference. All devices or consoles connected to the concentrators are by means of wireless connections using, for example, TM-UWB™ over a location based dynamic coordinate addressing network. This wireless connection is illustrated in
The concentrator acts as an intelligent router with a built-in query/control language and internal database for configuration, communication, and mapping of devices to their locations. In one embodiment of the invention, hardware utilizing, for example, a TM-UWB™ transceiver is installed in existing devices permitting them to communicate with other devices via a concentrator using wireless technology. In another embodiment of the invention, concentrator software may be installed in an existing computer along with the TM-UWB™ transceiver to create a concentrator that will permit consolidation of the concentrator into a network terminal server, and device management server. In another embodiment of the invention, the concentrator and the wireless console devices utilize TM-UWB™ reference stations for Position, Location, Tracking (PLT) data used by the location based dynamic coordinate network.
Before we discuss the details of this wireless connection, it is intuitive to discuss the Time Modulated—Ultra Wideband or TM-UWB™ technology used in the wireless connections of the present invention.
Wireless communication using the wireless protocol TM-UWB™ by the Time Domain Corporation requires no assigned spectrum of the wireless communication frequency because transmissions are pulse trains of individual ultra-wideband pulses sent at very precise time but varying intervals that resemble Morse code. This results in a very low average power transmission that creates a noise-like signal that can be used to transmit data, voice, and video communications. It can also be used as a tracking and positioning device as well as for radar. Because of the unique nature of TM-UWB™ signals, multi-path interference is eliminated. This makes TM-UWB™ ideal for indoor communications use in crowded electrically noisy environments such as computer rooms. The pulse trains can be channelized to create a multiple access system. Pseudo-random noise codes (PN codes) are used to accomplish this. A TM-UWB™ system can have virtually an unlimited number of channel codes. Each user would have a unique PN code sequence and only receivers using the same PN code sequence can decode the transmission. This can make eavesdropping or spoofing extremely difficult. TM_UWB™ also has a built-in location and tracking mechanism that is utilized in the present invention by the concentrator to map itself and all the devices connected to it on a Cartesian coordinate space or map. This permits accuracy to sub-centimeter but for this application the accuracy will be less than six inches. This feature of TM-UWB™ also helps in registering a new device to a concentrator when it has to be dynamically added to the network.
The concentrator is now ready to address devices within its map area, and is illustrated in
Once the devices are registered, the concentrator knows the addresses and locations of all the devices and can through periodic polling dynamically add new devices to the system as long as the coordinates of the new devices are not cataloged in the internal database, and the new devices are within the service range of the concentrator. This can be altered by modifications to the address scheme to allow for multiple small devices to occupy the same physical space.
The invention keeps the ability for the devices to be hard-wired to a portable console in case the wireless connection fails, needs repairs, or for convenience when performing hardware maintenance. This physical connection overrides the wireless connection, and is provided for redundancy. Another form of connection that the present invention permits to override the wireless connection is any wireless connection made within a predetermined override range from the console device. This range would generally be set very close (3 to 5 feet) for hardware maintenance by a wireless laptop console using, for example, a wireless protocol such as TM-UWB™.
By eliminating these wires and replacing them with wireless connections, the total number of wires to and from a hardware device like a concentrator is down to a minimum. This reduces the safety hazards associated with a tangled maze of wires, improves the aesthetic look of a room or a rack system full of computers and shared devices, and only allows devices registered to the concentrator to access a shared network of common resources and devices. Because of the nature of console/control network traffic, the number of active connections at any one time is generally far less than one percent of the available connections. Thus, a single wireless concentrator can in actuality service hundreds of times its actual bandwidth limitations and could conservatively replace the equivalent of 40,000 to 200,000 64 kbps duplex wired connections. This is thousands of times the current connection limit of today's largest console concentrators without the problems associated with wires.
With the ability to also dynamically register and plot the location within a large area all the devices under control of the concentrator, installation, control, monitoring, and maintenance of devices in a data center becomes greatly simplified and a task for automation by computer. Said computer and appropriate software could provide for dynamic creation of selective visual 3-D maps of a concentrators control area. Utilizing a protocol similar to SNMP, all forms of maps could be created like control, audit, layout, IP networks, machine types, ownership, inventory, and security from the various console devices in the control area.
Thus, a method and apparatus for a wireless console/control concentrator utilizing a location based dynamic coordinate addressing network over a programmable pulse modulated RF transceiver such as TM-UWB™ is described in conjunction with one or more specific embodiments. The invention is defined by the following claims and their full scope of equivalents.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US5150310 *||Aug 30, 1989||Sep 22, 1992||Consolve, Inc.||Method and apparatus for position detection|
|US6721572 *||Mar 24, 2000||Apr 13, 2004||International Business Machines Corporation||Mobile communication optimization near wireless dead zone regions|
|US20010049282 *||Feb 10, 1999||Dec 6, 2001||Kazumasa Ushiki||Mobile communication system|
|US20020115454 *||Feb 20, 2001||Aug 22, 2002||Sony Corporation And Sony Electronics, Inc.||Wireless sports view display and business method of use|
|US20030036374 *||Jun 4, 2001||Feb 20, 2003||Time Domain Corporation||Wireless local area network using impulse radio technology to improve communications between mobile nodes and access points|
|US20030117320 *||Mar 22, 2002||Jun 26, 2003||Eung-Bae Kim||Apparatus and method for tracking location of mobile station|
|US20030142016 *||Jan 30, 2002||Jul 31, 2003||Pickup Ray L.||System and method for locating an output device|
|US20030220765 *||May 24, 2002||Nov 27, 2003||Overy Michael Robert||Method and apparatus for enhancing security in a wireless network using distance measurement techniques|
|US20040203704 *||Jun 10, 2002||Oct 14, 2004||Andrew Corporation||Indoor wireless voice and data distribution system|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US7554965 *||Sep 23, 2003||Jun 30, 2009||Broadcom Corporation||UWB (Ultra Wide Band) waveform design to minimize narrowband interference|
|US20040233972 *||Sep 23, 2003||Nov 25, 2004||Jeyhan Karaoguz||UWB (Ultra Wide Band) waveform design to minimize narrowband interference|
|U.S. Classification||455/508, 455/404.2|
|International Classification||H04B1/69, H04L12/28, H04B7/00|
|Cooperative Classification||H04W8/02, H04W8/26, H04W60/04, H04B1/7163, H04W12/08|
|European Classification||H04B1/7163, H04W8/02|
|Aug 22, 2002||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: SUN MICROSYSTEMS, INC., CALIFORNIA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:MALLETT, MICHAEL J.;REEL/FRAME:013230/0446
Effective date: 20020702
|May 29, 2007||CC||Certificate of correction|
|Jul 28, 2010||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|Jul 30, 2014||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 8