Publication number | US7213454 B2 |

Publication type | Grant |

Application number | US 11/099,704 |

Publication date | May 8, 2007 |

Filing date | Apr 6, 2005 |

Priority date | Apr 6, 2005 |

Fee status | Paid |

Also published as | DE102006016311A1, DE102006016311B4, US20060225496 |

Publication number | 099704, 11099704, US 7213454 B2, US 7213454B2, US-B2-7213454, US7213454 B2, US7213454B2 |

Inventors | Travis Jon Schauer, Derrick David Hongerholt, Dennis James Cronin |

Original Assignee | Rosemount Aerospace Inc. |

Export Citation | BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan |

Patent Citations (41), Non-Patent Citations (16), Referenced by (7), Classifications (9), Legal Events (4) | |

External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet | |

US 7213454 B2

Abstract

A method of calculating a system level air data parameter for an aircraft, for example aircraft angle-of-attack (AOA) and/or angle-of-sideslip (AOS), includes measuring a plurality of local static pressures p_{i}. Next, a plurality of non-dimensional pressure ratios are each generated as a function of one of the plurality of local static pressures p_{i}, a predicted system static pressure Ps_{predicted}, and a predicted impact pressure q_{c predicted}. Then, the system level air data parameter is calculated as a function of the generated plurality of non-dimensional pressure ratios. Air data systems having air data computers configured to implement the method are also disclosed. The air data systems can be Flush Air Data Systems (FADS), or other types of air data systems.

Claims(20)

1. A method of calculating a system level air data parameter for an aircraft, the method comprising:

measuring a plurality of local static pressures p_{i};

generating a plurality of non-dimensional pressure ratios, with each non-dimensional pressure ratio being generated as a function of one of the plurality of local static pressures p_{i}, a predicted system static pressure Ps_{predicted}, and a predicted impact pressure q_{c predicted};

calculating the system level air data parameter as a function of the generated plurality of non-dimensional pressure ratios;

providing the system level air data parameter as an output.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein calculating the system level air data parameter as a function of the generated plurality of non-dimensional pressure ratios further comprises calculating at least one of an aircraft angle-of attack (AOA) and an aircraft angle-of sideslip (AOS).

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein generating the plurality of non-dimensional pressure ratios also as a function of the predicted impact pressure q_{c predicted }further comprises generating the plurality of non-dimensional pressure ratios as a function of a predicted system total pressure Pt_{predicted}, where the predicted impact pressure q_{c predicted }is equal to the predicted system total pressure Pt_{predicted }minus the predicted system static pressure Ps_{predicted}.

4. The method of claim 3 , wherein generating the plurality of non-dimensional pressure ratios further comprises generating each non-dimensional pressure ratio for a particular local static pressure P_{i }using a relationship that can be represented by the expression:

(pi-PS_{predicted})/(Pt_{predicted}-Ps_{predicted}).

(pi-PS

5. The method of claim 1 , and before generating the plurality of non-dimensional pressure ratios, further comprising:

generating a first plurality of non-dimensional local static pressure values, with each of the first plurality of non-dimensional local static pressure values being generated as a function of one of the plurality of local static pressures P_{i }and a mean p_{i } of the plurality of local static pressures p_{i}; and

producing the predicted system static pressure Ps_{predicted }as a function of the first plurality of non-dimensional local static pressure values.

6. The method of claim 5 , wherein generating the first plurality of non-dimensional local static pressure values further comprises generating each of the first plurality of non-dimensional local static pressure values using a relationship that can be represented by the expression

7. The method of claim 6 , wherein producing the predicted system static pressure Ps_{predicted }as a function of the first plurality of non-dimensional local static pressure values comprises:

producing a non-dimensional predicted static pressure value that can be represented by the expression;

and

re-dimensionalizing the non-dimensional predicted static pressure value, by multiplying

by the mean p_{i }of the plurality of local static pressures P_{i}, to produce the predicted system static pressure Ps_{predicted}.

8. The method of claim 5 , and before generating the plurality of non-dimensional pressure ratios, further comprising:

generating a second plurality of non-dimensional local static pressure values, with each of the second plurality of non-dimensional local static pressure values being generated as a function of one of the plurality of local static pressures p_{i}, and the predicted system static pressure Ps_{predicted}; and

producing the predicted impact pressure q_{c predicted }as a function of the second plurality of non-dimensional local static pressure values.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein generating the second plurality of non-dimensional local static pressure values further comprises generating each of the second plurality of non-dimensional local static pressure values using a relationship that can be represented by the expression,

and wherein producing the predicted impact pressure q_{c predicted }further comprises producing a non-dimensional impact pressure value as a function of the second plurality of non-dimensional local static pressure values.

10. The method of claim 9 , and further comprising re-dimensionalizing the non-dimensional impact pressure value by multiplying it by the predicted system static pressure Ps_{predicted }to produce the predicted impact pressure q_{c predicted}.

11. The method of claim 1 , wherein measuring the plurality of local static pressures further comprises measuring the plurality of local static pressures using static pressure sensing ports of a flush air data system.

12. A flush air data system having an air data computer configured to implement the method of claim 1 .

13. An air data system comprising:

a plurality of static pressure sensing ports each measuring one of a plurality of local static pressures p_{i};

an air data computer configured to implement air data parameter calculating steps comprising:

generating a plurality of non-dimensional pressure ratios, with each non-dimensional pressure ratio being generated as a function of one of the plurality of local static pressures p_{i}, a predicted system static pressure Ps_{predicted}, and a predicted impact pressure q_{c predicted};

calculating a system level air data parameter as a function of the generated plurality of non-dimensional pressure ratios; and

providing the system level air data parameter as an output.

14. The air data system of claim 13 , wherein generating the plurality of non-dimensional pressure ratios also as a function of the predicted impact pressure q_{c predicted }further comprises generating the plurality of non-dimensional pressure ratios as a function of a predicted system total pressure Pt_{predicted}, where the predicted impact pressure q_{c predicted }is equal to the predicted system total pressure Pt _{predicted }minus the predicted system static pressure Ps _{predicted}.

15. The air data system of claim 14 , wherein generating the plurality of non-dimensional pressure ratios further comprises generating each non-dimensional pressure ratio for a particular local static pressure P_{i }using a relationship that can be represented by the expression:

(P_{i}-Ps_{predicted})/(Pt_{predicted}-Ps_{predicted}).

(P

16. The air data system of claim 15 , wherein the air data computer is further configured to implement additional air data parameter calculating steps, before generating the plurality of non-dimensional pressure ratios, comprising:

generating a first plurality of non-dimensional local static pressure values, with each of the first plurality of non-dimensional local static pressure values being generated as a function of one of the plurality of local static pressures P_{i }and a mean p_{i } of the plurality of local static pressures P_{i }using a relationship that can be represented by the expression

and

producing the predicted system static pressure Ps_{predicted }as a function of the first plurality of non-dimensional local static pressure values.

17. The air data system of claim 16 , wherein producing the predicted system static pressure Ps_{predicted }as a function of the first plurality of non-dimensional local static pressure values further comprises:

producing a non-dimensional predicted static pressure value that can be represented by the expression

and

re-dimensionalizing the non-dimensional predicted static pressure value, by multiplying

by the mean p_{i } of the plurality of local static pressures P_{i}, to produce the predicted system static pressure Ps_{predicted}.

18. The air data system of claim 16 , wherein the air data computer is further configured to implement additional air data parameter calculating steps, before generating the plurality of non-dimensional pressure ratios, comprising:

generating a second plurality of non-dimensional local static pressure values, with each of the second plurality of non-dimensional local static pressure values being generated as a function of one of the plurality of local static pressures p_{i }and the predicted system static pressure Ps_{predicted}; and

producing the predicted impact pressure q_{c predicted }as a function of the second plurality of non-dimensional local static pressure values.

19. The air data system of claim 18 , wherein generating the second plurality of non-dimensional local static pressure values further comprises generating each of the second plurality of non-dimensional local static pressure values using a relationship that can be represented by the expression,

and wherein producing the predicted impact pressure q_{c predicted }further comprises producing a non-dimensional impact pressure value as a function of the second plurality of non-dimensional local static pressure values.

20. The air data system of claim 19 , wherein the air data computer is further configured to implement the additional air data parameter calculating step comprising re-dimensionalizing the non-dimensional impact pressure value by multiplying it by the predicted system static pressure Ps_{predicted }to produce the predicted impact pressure q_{c predicted}.

Description

The present invention relates generally to Flush Air Data Systems (FADS) and other types of air data systems used on aircraft. More particularly, the present invention relates to methods and apparatus for improving the accuracy, reliability and/or range of air data parameters that are inferred from independent measurements of pressures that have interdependencies between each other.

Flush air data systems are increasingly being used or proposed on air vehicles or aircraft (manned or unmanned). A FADS typically utilizes several flush or semi-flush static pressure ports on the exterior of an aircraft to measure local static pressures at various positions. The pressure or pressure values measured by the individual ports are combined using some form of algorithm(s) into system (global or aircraft level) air data parameters for the aircraft. Examples of these system air data parameters for the aircraft include angle-of-attack (AOA), angle-of-sideslip (AOS), Mach number, etc. Other well known system air data parameters for the aircraft can also be derived from estimates of static and total pressure and their rates of change.

Flush air data systems provide numerous advantages that make their use desirable for certain aircraft or in certain environments. For example, the flush or semi-flush static pressure ports can result in less drag on the aircraft than some other types of pressure sensing devices. Additionally, the flush or semi-flush static pressure sensing ports experience less ice build-up than some other types of pressure sensing devices. Other advantages of a FADS can include, for example, lower observability than some probe-style air data systems.

Suppose a FADS includes N flush static ports, each individually measuring a single local pressure value p_{i }related to its perspective location on the aircraft. By way of example, a traditional FADS might typically include approximately five pressure sensing ports (N=5) positioned on the aircraft, though other numbers of ports can be used instead. Using one or more algorithms, these N local pressure values p_{i }can be combined to infer the individual pieces necessary for an air data system, e.g., total pressure Pt, static pressure Ps, AOA and AOS. A wide variety of algorithms can be used provide these inferred air data parameters. For example, algorithms used in conventional five hole spherical head air data sensing probes can be used. Other algorithms that can be used include, for example, those based on multi-dimensional look-up tables, higher order multi-variable polynomial curve fitting, Kalman filters, etc. Increasingly, it has been proposed that the pressures or pressure values p_{i }be combined using some form of artificial intelligence algorithms, e.g., neural networks (NNs), support vector machines (SVMs), etc.

One shortcoming of current approaches to FADS relates to the use of traditional methods to estimate AOA and AOS Traditional methods use only a couple of ports (which measure local static pressures p_{i}) to estimate AOA and AOS before the estimates are refined using neural networks or other artificial intelligence algorithms. However, in this approach, if one port is lost due to a bird strike, power failure, etc., the entire system is lost. Thus, there is a need in the art to increase reliability, accuracy, and redundancy in FADS and other types of air data systems.

Embodiments of the present invention provide solutions to these and/or other problems, and offer other advantages over the prior art.

A method of calculating a system level air data parameter for an aircraft, for example aircraft angle of attack (AOA) and/or angle of sideslip (AOS), includes measuring a plurality of local static pressures p_{i}. Next, a plurality of non-dimensional pressure ratios are each generated as a function of one of the plurality of local static pressures p_{i}, a predicted system static pressure Ps_{predicted}, and a predicted impact pressure q_{c predicted}. Then, the system level air data parameter is calculated as a function of the generated plurality of non-dimensional pressure ratios. Air data systems having air data computers configured to implement the method are also disclosed. The air data systems can be Flush Air Data Systems (FADS), or other types of air data systems.

Other features and benefits that characterize embodiments of the present invention will be apparent upon reading the following detailed description and review of the associated drawings.

**1**-**2** are diagrammatic illustrations of flush air data pressure sensing ports on an aircraft as seen from top and bottom views, respectively, in an example embodiment.

**1**-**2** are diagrammatic illustrations, respectively in top and bottom views, of an aircraft or air vehicle **100** that employs a flush air data system (FADS) in accordance with example embodiments of the present invention. Flush air data systems are generally known in the art. For example, aspects of one such FADS is described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,253,166 issued to Whitmore et al. on Jun. 26, 2001 and entitled STABLE ALGORITHM FOR ESTIMATING AIRDATA FROM FLUSH SURFACE PRESSURE MEASUREMENTS. Other examples of FADS or aspects of FADS are described in: (1) *Air Data Sensing from Surface Pressure Measurements Using a Neural Network, *Method AIAA Journal, vol. 36, no. 11, pp. 2094–2101(8) (1 Nov. 1998) by Rohloff T. J., Angeles L., Whitmore S. A., and Catton I; (2) *Fault*-*Tolerant Neural Network Algorithm for Flush Air Data Sensing*, Journal of Aircraft, vol. 36, iss. 3, pp. 541–549(9) (1 May 1999) by Rohloff T. J., Whitmore S. A., and Catton I; (3) *Fault Tolerance and Extrapolation Stability of a Neural Network Air*-*Data Estimator, *Journal of Aircraft, vol. 36, iss. 3, pp. 571–576(6) (1 May 1999) by Rohloff T. J. and Catton I; and (4) *Failure Management Scheme for Use in a Flush Air Data System, *Aircraft Design 4, pp. 151–162 (2001) by C. V. Srinatha Sastry, K. S. Raman, and B. Lakshman Babu.

The FADS employed by aircraft **100** includes, in one illustrated example, eleven flush (or semi-flush) static pressure sensing ports **110** (reference numbers **110**-**1** through **110**-**11**) positioned at various locations on the exterior of the vehicle. The individual ports **110** each measure a single local static pressure value p_{i }related to their respective locations on the aircraft. These pressure values are then combined, using some form of artificial intelligence algorithms (neural networks, support vector machines, etc), to generate system air data parameters such as aircraft AOA and AOS. While **1**-**2** illustrate eleven static pressure sensing ports in particular locations, the particular number and locations of ports **110** can vary as desired for the particular aircraft and application. Other examples of FADS as described herein use N static pressure sensing ports. The present invention is thus not limited to FADS having any particular number of static pressure sensing ports, or to the particular port locations shown in **1**-**2**. Further, the present invention is not limited to FADS, but can instead be used more generally in air data systems that generate system air data parameters as functions of multiple local static pressures, and particularly those using artificial intelligence algorithms to do so.

**200**, in accordance with embodiments of the present invention, which is configured to implement air data parameter generating algorithms described below. While characteristics of the algorithms are described below, it must be noted that the specific implementation of the algorithms can be accomplished using any desired techniques and technologies. For example, the methods can be implemented using neural networks or other artificial intelligence algorithms, but this need not be the case in all embodiments. System **200** is one example embodiment of a FADS used on aircraft **100**. While

As illustrated in **200** includes N flush static ports **110** (numbered **110**-**1** through **110**-N, respectively). The individual ports each measure a single local static pressure value p_{i }(for i between 1 and N) related to their respective locations on the aircraft **100**. Using algorithms implemented in air data computer circuitry **210**, these N pressure values can be combined or used to generate one or more aircraft or system level air data parameters **220** as desired. Examples of these system air data parameters include, but are not limited to, angle-of-attack (AOA), angle-of-sideslip (AOS), and Mach number.

In accordance with embodiments of the present invention, a selected number of pressure readings, p_{i}, are first used to derive a system static pressure Ps and a system total pressure Pt (or alternatively system static pressure Ps and impact pressure q_{c}). The number of ports required depends on the accuracy and locations of the ports, and a different set of ports may be required for each derived parameter. Once Ps and Pt (or Ps and q_{c}) are estimated, both are used along with a selected number of pressure readings to infer system or aircraft AOA and AOS. In this case, predicted Pt and Ps are used to form non-dimensional pressure ratios, (p_{i}−Ps_{predicted})/(Pt_{predicted}−Ps_{predicted}), that are used as inputs for the neural networks and/or other artificial intelligence algorithms implemented within air data computer **210** to predict AOA and AOS. By using this technique, the accuracy of the predicted AOA and AOS values are significantly increased, as can be seen in

In accordance with embodiments of the present invention, air data computer **210** includes circuitry (for example suitably configured processors, integrated chips, etc) that is configured to implement the methods illustrated in some or all of

Referring now to **350** of calculating an air data parameter in accordance with some embodiments of the present invention. As shown at step **355**, the method includes measuring local static pressures p_{i }from the static pressure sensing ports **110**. Then, at step **360**, the method is shown to include generating non-dimensional pressure ratios from the local static pressures p_{i}. Each non-dimensional pressure ratio is generated as a function of one of the local static pressures p_{i}, a predicted system static pressure Ps_{predicted}, and a predicted impact pressure q_{c predicted}. Since predicted impact pressure q_{c predicted }is equal to Pt_{predicted}−Ps_{predicted}, in this step each non-dimensional pressure ratio can be considered to be generated as a function of the predicted total pressure Pt_{predicted }instead of directly as a function of the predicted impact pressure q_{c predicted }since these pressures are dependent on each other. As discussed above, in an exemplary embodiment, in step **360**, the non-dimensional pressure ratios are each generated, for a particular local static pressure p_{i}, using a relationship that can be represented by the expression shown in Equation 1:

(*p* _{i} *−Ps* _{predicted})/(*Pt* _{predicted} *−Ps* _{predicted}). Equation 1

Finally, method **350** shown in **365** of calculating the system level air data parameter as a function of the generated non-dimensional pressure ratios. For example, the non-dimensional pressure ratios defined in Equation 1 can be used as inputs to a suitably trained neural network that provides the system level air data parameter (e.g., AOA, AOS, etc.) as an output. Multiple neural networks or other artificial intelligence algorithms can also be used to provide multiple air data parameters, each as a function of the same set, or different sets, of non-dimensional pressure ratios.

Referring now to **400**, that includes the steps of method **350** shown in **425** and **450**, shown respectively in **425** and **450** can optionally be used as pre-processing steps to those of method **350**, the blocks corresponding to methods **425** and **450** are shown in dashed lines to represent their optional nature.

Referring now to **425** of predicting system static pressure Ps_{predicted }used in step **360** of method **350** shown in **425** is not the only method of predicting system static pressure Ps_{predicted }that can be used in step **360**, and therefore method **350** is not limited to use with a predicted system static pressure Ps_{predicted }produced using method **425**.

As shown at step **505**, method **425** includes generating a first set of non-dimensional local static pressure values. Each of the first set of non-dimensional local static pressure values is generated as a function of one of the local static pressures p_{i }and an average or mean _{i}

However, in another embodiment, the first set of non-dimensional local static pressure values is generated by the expression

(for i>1). Using a first local static pressure value p_{i }to non-dimensionalize the other local static pressure values thereby eliminates one input p_{i}.

Then, as shown at step **510**, method **425** includes producing the predicted system static pressure Ps_{predicted }as a function of the first set of non-dimensional local static pressure values. This can be accomplished, for example, using a trained neural network or other artificial intelligence algorithm. In an exemplary embodiment, step **510** of producing the predicted system static pressure Ps_{predicted }as a function of the first set of non-dimensional local static pressure values includes the sub-steps of first producing a non-dimensional predicted static pressure value that can be represented by the expression

This non-dimensional predicted static pressure value would be, for example, the output of a neural network that takes as inputs the first set on non-dimensional local static pressure values. Then, the non-dimensional predicted static pressure value is re-dimensionalized by multiplying it by the mean _{i} _{i}, to produce the predicted system static pressure Ps_{predicted}.

Referring now to **450** of predicting impact pressure q_{c predicted }that can be used in step **360** of method **350** shown in **350** is not limited to use with impact pressures predicted using method **450**. As shown at step **605**, method **450** includes generating a second set of non-dimensional local static pressure values, with each of the second set of non-dimensional local static pressure values being generated as a function of one of the local static pressures p_{i }and the predicted system static pressure Ps_{predicted}. Then, as shown at step **610**, the method includes producing the predicted impact pressure q_{c predicted }as a function of the second set of non-dimensional static pressure values.

In one exemplary embodiment, in step **605**, the second set of non-dimensional static pressure values is generated using a relationship that can be represented by the expression

In this embodiment, step **610** of producing the predicted impact pressure q_{c predicted }includes producing a non-dimensional impact pressure value as a function of the second set of non-dimensional static pressure values. Then, in this embodiment, step **610** also includes re-dimensionalizing the non-dimensional impact pressure value by multiplying it by the predicted system static pressure Ps_{predicted }to produce the predicted impact pressure q_{c predicted}.

Using the methods illustrated in _{predicted }and system total pressure Pt_{predicted}, including indirectly by predicting impact pressure q_{c predicted}, the air data parameters of AOA and AOS can be calculated with significant reduction in errors. For example, _{predicted }and system total pressure Pt_{predicted }using these methods. _{predicted }and system total pressure Pt_{predicted }generated using these methods. As can be clearly seen, AOA and AOS errors are reduced significantly.

Although the present invention has been described with reference to preferred embodiments, workers skilled in the art will recognize that changes may be made in form and detail without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. For example, while methods **350**, **425** and **450** can be used in a single larger method, this is not required in all embodiments. The method steps shown in each of these methods can be used separately for different purposes if desired.

Patent Citations

Cited Patent | Filing date | Publication date | Applicant | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|

US3318146 * | Feb 14, 1966 | May 9, 1967 | Rosemount Eng Co Ltd | Pressure sensing instrument for aircraft |

US4096744 | Sep 5, 1975 | Jun 27, 1978 | Rosemount Inc. | Pressure sensor for determining airspeed, altitude and angle of attack |

US4303978 | Apr 18, 1980 | Dec 1, 1981 | The Boeing Company | Integrated-strapdown-air-data sensor system |

US4378696 | Feb 23, 1981 | Apr 5, 1983 | Rosemount Inc. | Pressure sensor for determining airspeed altitude and angle of attack |

US4378697 | Jul 6, 1981 | Apr 5, 1983 | Rosemount Inc. | Strut mounted multiple static tube |

US4615213 * | Dec 22, 1983 | Oct 7, 1986 | Rosemount Inc. | Pressure sensing instrument for aircraft |

US4644538 | Jun 16, 1982 | Feb 17, 1987 | The Boeing Company | Autopilot flight director system |

US4836019 * | Aug 27, 1987 | Jun 6, 1989 | Rosemount Inc. | Compact air data sensor |

US4987542 | May 11, 1989 | Jan 22, 1991 | Daimler-Benz Ag | Arrangement for determining the effects of cross winds on vehicles |

US5205169 | Aug 8, 1991 | Apr 27, 1993 | Rosemount Inc. | Angle of attack sensor using inverted ratio of pressure differentials |

US5319970 | Mar 22, 1991 | Jun 14, 1994 | Rosemount, Inc. | Continuously curved strut mounted sensor |

US5369993 | Jun 30, 1993 | Dec 6, 1994 | The B. F. Goodrich Company | Three axis air data system for air vehicles |

US5423209 | May 25, 1994 | Jun 13, 1995 | National Aerospace Laboratory Of Science And Technology Agency | Truncated pyramid-shape multi-hole pitot probe and flight velocity detection system using said truncated pyramid-shape multi-hole pitot probe |

US5485412 | Oct 20, 1994 | Jan 16, 1996 | Rautaruukki Oy | Method and apparatus for successive horizontal and vertical data filtering |

US5610845 | Aug 30, 1994 | Mar 11, 1997 | United Technologies Corporation | Multi-parameter air data sensing technique |

US5616861 | Jun 7, 1995 | Apr 1, 1997 | Rosemount Aerospace Inc. | Three pressure pseudo -Δ-P sensor for use with three pressure air data probe |

US5710559 | Mar 10, 1995 | Jan 20, 1998 | Bodenseewerk Geratetechnik Gmbh | Flight safety monitoring device for aircraft with alarm |

US5797105 | Nov 20, 1997 | Aug 18, 1998 | National Aerospace Laboratory Of Science & Technology | Air active control aircraft using three dimensional true airspeed detection system |

US5819188 | Mar 18, 1997 | Oct 6, 1998 | Aurora Flight Sciences Corporation | Fault tolerant automatic control system utilizing analytic redundancy |

US5901272 | Oct 24, 1996 | May 4, 1999 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy | Neural network based helicopter low airspeed indicator |

US6073084 | Mar 3, 1998 | Jun 6, 2000 | Aerospatiale Societe Nationale Industrielle | Process and device for verifying the consistency of the measurements from an angle-of-attack probe |

US6253166 | Oct 5, 1998 | Jun 26, 2001 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space Administration | Stable algorithm for estimating airdata from flush surface pressure measurements |

US6305218 | Feb 22, 1999 | Oct 23, 2001 | Rosemount Aerospace Inc. | Method of and apparatus for using an alternate pressure to measure mach number at high probe angles of attack |

US6466888 | Aug 26, 1999 | Oct 15, 2002 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy | Neural network system for estimation of aircraft flight data |

US6561020 | May 8, 2001 | May 13, 2003 | Rosemount Aerospace Inc. | Method to calculate sideslip angle and correct static pressure for sideslip effects using inertial information |

US6594559 | May 8, 2001 | Jul 15, 2003 | Rosemount Aerospace Inc. | Iterative method of aircraft sideslip compensation for multi-function probe air data systems |

US6604029 | May 8, 2001 | Aug 5, 2003 | Rosemount Aerospace Inc. | Multi-function air data probes using neural network for sideslip compensation |

US6609421 | May 8, 2001 | Aug 26, 2003 | Rosemount Aerospace Inc. | Sideslip correction for a multi-function three probe air data system |

US6668640 * | Aug 12, 2002 | Dec 30, 2003 | Rosemount Aerospace Inc. | Dual-channel electronic multi-function probes and methods for realizing dissimilar and independent air data outputs |

US6761057 | Sep 13, 2001 | Jul 13, 2004 | Rosemount Aerospace Inc. | Error detection and fault isolation for multi-function air data probes and systems |

US20040122615 | Dec 23, 2002 | Jun 24, 2004 | Cronin Dennis J. | Multi-function air data probes employing neural networks for determining local air data parameters |

US20060155506 | Dec 28, 2005 | Jul 13, 2006 | Rosemount Aerospace Inc. | Multi-function air data probes employing neural networks for determining local air data parameters |

US20060212181 | Mar 16, 2005 | Sep 21, 2006 | Rosemount Aerospace Inc. | Method and apparatus for extending useful range of air data parameter calculation in flush air data systems |

DE3727906A1 | Aug 21, 1987 | Mar 2, 1989 | Messerschmitt Boelkow Blohm | Device for the redundant measurement of the incidence angle and slip angle of flying vehicles, in particular aircraft |

DE4410709A1 | Mar 28, 1994 | Oct 5, 1995 | Bodenseewerk Geraetetech | Überwachungs-Einrichtung zur Überwachung der Flugsicherheit von Flugzeugen |

EP1256811A2 | Apr 30, 2002 | Nov 13, 2002 | Rosemount Aerospace Inc. | Multi-function air data probes using neural network for sideslip compensation |

EP1293784A2 | Sep 4, 2002 | Mar 19, 2003 | Rosemount Aerospace Inc. | Error detection and fault isolation for multi-function air data probes and systems |

GB1176381A | Title not available | |||

RU2041136C1 | Title not available | |||

RU2103718C1 | Title not available | |||

WO1999032963A1 | Dec 18, 1998 | Jul 1, 1999 | Accurate Automation Corporation | Air data sensor apparatus and method |

Non-Patent Citations

Reference | ||
---|---|---|

1 | "BFGoodrich-Aircraft Sensors Division Air Data System with SmartProbe for Fairchiled Dornier 728JET", BFGoodrich-Rosemount Aerospace, Addendum to D9820217 Rev. B, Oct. 1998, pp. 1-10. | |

2 | "SmartProbe(TM) Air Data System for Embraer ERJ-170 & 190", BFGoodrich-Aircraft Sensors Divison, Proposal D9920133, Apr. 1999, pp. 1-65. | |

3 | "What is an Artificial Neural Network?", Battelle Memorial Institute (Copyright 1997), (Publication at least by Apr. 9, 2001), http://www.emsl.pnl.gov:2080/proj/neuron/neural/what.html. | |

4 | Bulletin 1013, "Pitot and Pitot-Static Probes", BFGoodrich (May 1998). | |

5 | C. Stergiou, "What is a Neural Network?", (Publication at least by Apr. 9, 2001), http://www.doc.ic.ac.uk/~nd/surprise<SUB>-</SUB>96/journal/vol1/cs11/article1.html. | |

6 | D. Clark, "An Introduction to Neural Networks", Copyright 1991, 1997 (Publication at least by Apr. 9, 2001), http://members.home.net/neuralnet/introtonn/index.htm. | |

7 | F.W. Hagen and Dr. H. Seidel, "Deutsche Airbus Flight Test of Rosemount Smart Probe for Distributed Air Data System", IEEE AES Systems Magazine, Apr. 1994, pp. 7-14. | |

8 | Rohloff et al., T. J., "Air Data Sensing from Surface Pressure Measurements Using a Neural Network Method", AIAA Journal, Vo. 36, No. 11, Nov. 1998, pp. 2094-2101. | |

9 | Rohloff et al., T. J., "Air Data Sensing from Surface Pressure Measurements Using a Neural Network Method", AIAA Journal, vol. 36, No. 11, pp. 2095-2101, Nov. 1998. | |

10 | Rohloff et al., T. J., "Fault-Tolerance Neural Network Algorithm for Flush Air Data Sensing", Journal of Aircraft, vol. 36, No. 3, pp. 571-576May-Jun. 1999. | |

11 | Rohloff et al., T.J., "Fault-Tolerant Neural Network Algorithm for Flush Air Data Sensing", Journal of Aircraft, vol. 36, No. 3, May-Jun. 1999, pp. 541-549. | |

12 | Rohloff, T.J., "Fault Tolerance and Extrapolation Stability of a Neural Network Air-Data Estimator", Journal of Aircraft, vol. 36, No. 3, May-Jun. 1999, pp. 571-576. | |

13 | Search Report dated Jan. 9, 2006 for Application No. GB0519751.2. | |

14 | Search Report issued by the U.K. Patent Office in Application No. GB0605207.0. | |

15 | Stickney et al., T. M., "Total Temperature Sensors, Technical Report 5755, Revision C", Rosemount Aerospace/BFGoodrich, Jan. 1994. | |

16 | U.S. Appl. No. 10/977,442, filed Oct. 29, 2004, entitled "Fault Isolation Method and Apparatus in Artificial Intelligence Based Air Data Systems". |

Referenced by

Citing Patent | Filing date | Publication date | Applicant | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|

US8104339 * | May 29, 2008 | Jan 31, 2012 | Honeywell International Inc. | Systems and methods for determining air data parameters |

US8374804 | Feb 12, 2010 | Feb 12, 2013 | Honeywell International Inc. | Aircraft dynamic pressure estimation system and method |

US8479581 | May 3, 2011 | Jul 9, 2013 | General Electric Company | Device and method for measuring pressure on wind turbine components |

US20060212181 * | Mar 16, 2005 | Sep 21, 2006 | Rosemount Aerospace Inc. | Method and apparatus for extending useful range of air data parameter calculation in flush air data systems |

US20090320586 * | May 29, 2008 | Dec 31, 2009 | Honeywell International Inc. | Systems and methods for determining air data parameters |

US20110202291 * | Feb 12, 2010 | Aug 18, 2011 | Honeywell International Inc. | Aircraft dynamic pressure estimation system and method |

US20150012155 * | Jul 3, 2014 | Jan 8, 2015 | Thales | Aircraft comprising a measuring probe and method for determining flight parameters of such an aircraft |

Classifications

U.S. Classification | 73/170.02, 73/182 |

International Classification | G01W7/00 |

Cooperative Classification | G01P5/14, G01P13/025, G01P5/16 |

European Classification | G01P5/16, G01P13/02A, G01P5/14 |

Legal Events

Date | Code | Event | Description |
---|---|---|---|

Apr 6, 2005 | AS | Assignment | Owner name: ROSEMOUNT AEROSPACE INC., MINNESOTA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:SCHAUER, TRAVIS JON;HONGERHOLT, DERRICK DAVID;CRONIN, DENNIS JAMES;REEL/FRAME:016456/0763 Effective date: 20050405 |

Nov 11, 2008 | CC | Certificate of correction | |

Nov 8, 2010 | FPAY | Fee payment | Year of fee payment: 4 |

Oct 8, 2014 | FPAY | Fee payment | Year of fee payment: 8 |

Rotate