|Publication number||US7216103 B2|
|Application number||US 10/188,027|
|Publication date||May 8, 2007|
|Filing date||Jul 1, 2002|
|Priority date||Dec 30, 1998|
|Also published as||US6449601, US8010415, US20020174060, US20070214074, US20110282756, WO2000039735A2, WO2000039735A3|
|Publication number||10188027, 188027, US 7216103 B2, US 7216103B2, US-B2-7216103, US7216103 B2, US7216103B2|
|Inventors||Noah S. Friedland, Sky T. Kruse|
|Original Assignee||Amazon.Com, Inc.|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (27), Non-Patent Citations (17), Referenced by (34), Classifications (11), Legal Events (3)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/231,127, filed Dec. 30, 1998, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,449,601 the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference.
The present invention relates to real time, network-based data processing systems. In particular, the invention relates to a network-based system, preferably including a hierarchical arrangement of data processing nodes, for efficiently disseminating real-time auction state information to remote bidders, and for collecting and processing bids from the remote bidders.
During the past five years, the Internet has blossomed from a medium for simple data exchange and messaging to the fastest growing, most innovative medium for information exchange and commerce. Virtual shopping malls, buying services, and other types of Internet-based retailing methods are being employed by an ever increasing number of retail merchants. In addition, a number of organizations, including eBay™, provide Internet-based auctions. Sellers of goods and services register those goods and services with the auction organization, and the auction organization then provides information over the Internet about the goods and services to potential bidders. A bidder may submit a bid via the Internet for a particular good or service to the auction organization. The auction organization collects bids over a period of time, after which the auction organization notifies the highest bidder that the highest bidder has submitted the winning bid, notifies the seller of the identity of the winning bidder, and provides for an exchange of information between the seller and the winning bidder for execution of the transaction. This type of auction is known as a “silent auction.”
With the rapid rise in popularity of Internet commerce and information services, and the rapid evolution of computer and communications technologies, great strides have been made in improving the timeliness, quality, quantity, and, perhaps most importantly, the types of information that can be exchanged through the Internet. Whereas ten years ago, the Internet was primarily used for file transfer and exchange of text-based messages, today the Internet is routinely used for distributing elaborate, interactive, real-time graphical displays, real-time audio, and real-time video. These technological improvements greatly increase the user appeal of Internet-based silent auctions. The technological innovations also provide a basis for more interesting and more interactive Internet-based auction models. For example, it would be desirable to conduct live auctions over the Internet
Distribution of a real-time, live auction is far more complex and technologically demanding than carrying out a silent auction over the Internet. Real-time live auctions are generally conducted by auctioneers in front of a live audience. Auctions are fast-paced, and bids may be submitted by very concise gestures or vocal signals. The auction of a single item may transpire in a very short interval of time, often as brief as ten seconds. Thus, real-time, live auctions require careful and quick monitoring and interaction with the auction process.
Real-time, live auctions comprise the auctioning of a sequence of lots. A lot may be a simple lot, composed of single good or service, or a choice or quantity lot, comprising a collection of goods and services that are auctioned together. Generally, a sequential inventory of the lots to be auctioned is prepared in advance and distributed to potential bidders in the form of a catalogue. However, the auctioneer generally has the discretion to change the sequence of lots during the auction, divide choice or quantity lots into smaller lots, or coalesce smaller lots into larger lots. Thus, during a live auction event, a bidder must monitor and quickly bid on a desired lot, while simultaneously tracking any changes in the sequence or groupings of goods and services offered.
There are a number of different types of auction styles. Yankee auctions begin with a low asking price, which is increased during the auction with each successful bid. Dutch auctions, by contrast, start with a high price that is decreased incrementally by the auctioneer until the auctioneer obtains a first, winning bid.
There are different types of lots, as mentioned above. Choice lots include a collection of goods or services. The auctioneer initiates bidding on a choice lot on a per-item price basis, eventually establishing a price point. The high bidder may select which items he or she wants from the inventory at that price point. The auctioneer offers the remaining inventory to the floor at the price-point value. If any items in the lot remain unsold, the auctioneer has the option of re-initiating bidding on a new lot comprising the unsold items, or passing and moving on to the next lot. Quantity lots comprise many identical items. As with choice lots, quantity lots involve establishing price points, although these price points typically have minimum quantities associated with them. The auctioneer first establishes a minimum quantity for a quantity lot, and then initiates bidding to establish a per-item price point. The high bidder may select the minimum quantity or may select more items at that price point. The auctioneer offers the remaining inventory to the floor at that minimum quantity and price point. If any inventory remains, the auctioneer establishes a new minimum quantity for the quantity lot, and then again initiates bidding to establish a per-item price point. The price points in quantity lots typically decrease as the minimum quantity constraint increases, allowing the auctioneer to sell small numbers of units at retail-lie values and large numbers of units at wholesale-like values within the same lot. A particular advantage to distributing a live auction over a communications medium, such as the Internet, is that, by bringing many thousands of Internet bidders to the auction, virtual bidders can have a huge impact on quantity lot pricing, with a far greater percentage of the inventory bid for and sold at retail-like values than at a conventional live event.
Real-time, live auctions have far greater entertainment value, and may be more efficient in time, than the silent auctions currently conducted over the Internet. However, for real-time, live auctions to be distributed over the Internet, Internet-based solutions and methodologies must be devised to overcome the many complex problems associated with real-time, live auctions. In particular, an Internet-based facility for distribution of real-time, live auctions to remote bidders over the Internet, or a similar communications medium, must address the following problems: (1) a need for real-time monitoring and interaction with the auctioneer and auction audience; (2) a need for rapidly disseminating status information from the live auction, in real-time, to remote bidders; (3) a need for rapidly and efficiently collecting bids from remote bidders and presenting those bids to the auctioneer; (4) a need for authorizing and verifying remote bidders' identities; and (5) a need for quickly determining any changes in the sequence of lots and lot assignments that occur during the course of a live auction and distributing information about the changes to remote bidders.
The present invention relates to the distribution of real-time, live auctions, conducted by a live auctioneer in the presence of an audience of bidders, to remote bidders via the Internet. The invention consists of four primary modules: a client program running on a remote computer, a network of collector/redistributor nodes running on the broadcaster's enterprise backbone, an auction server process associated with a database where auction state and persistent data are stored, and an auction console that resides at the site of the live event, allowing a proxy to introduce remote bids on the floor and report status back to the remote audience.
Each remote bidder interacts with a client program running on a remote computer. The client program allows the remote bidder to log into a distributed live auction (“DLA”) system in order to register as a remote bidder for a particular live auction. At the time that the live auction is conducted, the remote bidder interacts with the client program on the remote computer in order to follow the course of the real-time, live auction, and to submit bids. The remote bidder receives status updates concerning the bidding, lot state, and lot sequencing from the live auction via a graphical user interface provided on the remote computer by the client program, and may interact with the graphical user interface in order to submit bids for a particular lot.
The collector/redistributor nodes are heirarchically interconnected and serve to efficently collect and filter bids from a large number of remote bidders and pass potentially winning bids onto the auction server, and also serve to effeciently broadcast status messages concerning the live auction received from the auction server to a large number of remote client programs running on remote computers.
The auction server is a centralized connection point that interconnects collector/redistributor nodes, on-site auction consoles, and a database that computationally mirrors the states of one or more live auctions and that stores detailed information about both on-going and upcoming auctions. The auction server is the focal point for collecting bids from remote bidders and for distributing status information about one or more concurrent live auctions to remote bidders. Moreover, the auction server manages extensive information about current and future auctions, including detailed inventory lists and lot assignments. The auction server is directly connected to root-level collector/redistributor nodes and is also connected, via the Internet, to one or more auction consoles.
The auction console is a program running on a computer, often a laptop computer, that interacts with a human proxy in the audience of the live auction. The human proxy is notified of bids from remote bidders via the auction console program and may submit bids to the auctioneer during the auction process. The human proxy monitors the auction, reports changes in the state, such as successful bids or sales, as well as changes in the lot sequence or assignments via the auction console program to the auction server.
The DLA solves the problems associated with distributing a real-time, live auction using a combination of technologies, communications protocols, software programs, human proxies, centralized databases, and auction management methodologies. In particular, the human proxy is able to monitor and interact with the auction process in real-time, as well as monitor and report changes in lot sequences and assignments. The DLA architecture provides an efficient extremely fast medium for distributing status information about an auction to a large number of remote bidders and for collecting bids from remote bidders and presenting them to the auctioneer. The present invention thus provides a method for bringing the excitement and time efficiency of a live auction to remote bidders over the Internet.
The present invention will be described in three subsections that follow. In the first subsection, state transition diagrams are used to illustrate and contrast the silent auction model and the real-time, live auction model. The overall architecture of the Internet-enabled Distributed Live Auction (“DLA”) system is also presented in the first subsection. In the second subsection, the user interface provided to a remote bidder by the DLA is described, along with descriptions of messages passed between the client program and the DLA. In the third subsection, four basic types of components of the DLA are described using both block diagrams and flow control diagrams.
If no bids that meet some minimum price are received while the lot is in the active state 105, then, following transition to the inactive state 110, the lot may transition to the finish state via transition 113 when no provision has been made to automatically re-register the lot. Alternatively, the lot may transition to the lot registered state 102 via transition 114 when a provision has been made to automatically re-register the lot. Similarly, there may be an automatic provision to resubmit a lot that has not yet received a sufficient bid back to the active state 105 via transition 115 for an additional period of time.
If one or more sufficient bids are received for the lot while the lot is in the active state 105, then, following transition to the inactive state 110, the lot transitions via transition 116 to the sold state 111. If the lot contains only a single item or service, or the winning bidder chooses all the items in the lot, then the lot transitions from the sold state 111 to the finish state 112 via transition 117. If, on the other hand, there are more items in the lot not chosen by the winning bidder, then the lot may transition either back to the active state 105 via transition 118 or back to the lot registered state 102 via transition 104. A given silent auction implementation may include more or fewer states than the number of states shown in
Certain features of the state transition diagram shown in
In the silent auction, a large number of different lots may concurrently inhabit each of the different states. For example, many hundreds of different lots may be concurrently active for bidding. Because of this, the remote bidder does not need to constantly and rapidly monitor changes in the sequence of the auction or in lot assignments. All the items offered for auction can be viewed by a remote bidder during the course of the auction, and bids can be rationally submitted for those lots of interest to the remote bidder without concern for items being reassigned to different lots or the sequence of lots offered for auction being changed.
These pre-bids trigger the activation of a bidding agent that automatically produces bids after the lot transitions to the state “open for bidding” 210, discussed below, until either the pre-bidder wins, or the high bid exceeds the pre-bidder's bid value. After another interval of time, the lot transitions from the pre-bid state either to the open-for-bidding state 210 via transition 216 or to the state “pass” 218 via transition 220. The pass state represents the state of a lot that has likely been withdrawn from bidding by the seller, in the case of transition 220. A reason for transition 220 is that the submitted pre-bids are insufficient to warrant placing the lot up for auction. From the pass state 218 the lot may either transition back to the lot registered state 202 via transition 222, in the case that withdrawn lots are automatically rescheduled, or may transition to the state “finish” 224 via transition 226 in the case that withdrawn lots are removed from further consideration. Other transitions from the pass state 218 may be possible in particular implementations, including automatic transitions (not shown) back to the pre-bid 214 and open-for-bidding 210 states.
Once a lot transitions to the open-for-bidding state 210, real-time bids are solicited for the lot by a live auctioneer. Only a single lot can inhabit the open-for-bidding state at given time in a live auction. That is also true for the remaining states in the state transition diagram, including the state “presold” 226, the state “fair warning” 228, the state “last chance” 230, the state “sold” 232, and the state “inventory reduction” 233.
From the open-for-bidding state 210, the lot may transition via transitions 234 and 236 to the pass state 218, in the case that no bid, or no sufficient bid, is received after some period of time. During the period of time, insufficient bids can be received via transition 238. When a sufficient bid, i.e. a bid equal to or exceeding some minimum desired value, is obtained, the lot transitions via transition 240 to the presold state 226. A lot in the presold state will be sold to the current highest bidder unless a higher bid is received within some time interval. Additional higher bids may be accepted for the lot while the lot inhabits the presold state 226 via transition 242.
If no further bids are received during some time interval, then the lot transitions from the presold state 226 to the fair warning state 228 via transition 244. If a higher bid is received for the lot while it is in the fair warning state 228, then the lot transitions from the fair warning state 228 via transition 246 back to the presold state 226. On the other hand, if no higher bid is received for the lot while it resides in the fair warning state 228, then the lot transitions via transition 248 to the last chance state 230. If a higher bid is received for the lot while the lot inhabits the last chance state 230, the lot transitions back to the presold state 226 via transition 250. However, if no higher bid is received for the lot while the lot inhabits the last chance state 230, then the lot transitions from the last chance state 230 via transition 252 to the sold state 232. If there are no more items in the lot, then the lot transitions from the sold state 232 via transition 254 to the finish state 254. If, on the other hand there are items remaining in the lot that were not sold to the first winning bidder, then the lot transtions via transition 256 to the inventory-reduction state 233, in which other bidders may purchase items from the lot at the current bid price. If unsold items remain after a period of time, the lot containing those unsold items may transition, via transition 257, back to the open-for-bidding state 210.
The additional complexities involved in implementing an Internet-based live auction, in contrast to implementing the silent auction illustrated in
As mentioned above, only a single lot can be in any of the active states at any instant of time during the action process period. Thus, the remote bidders must be rapidly notified of changes in lot sequences and lot assignments in order to intelligently participate in the bidding. For example, if a complex lot has been divided by the auctioneer during the auction, and a remote bidder is interested in purchasing a single item from the original complex lot, the remote bidder needs to aware that the remote bidder may have a second chance to bid on the desired item later in auction, following auction of the first of the divided lots, in order to avoid bidding too aggressively for the first of the divided lots. Thus, not only must a large amount of status information concerning the state of a given lot be distributed to remote bidders, but a large amount of additional information concerning lot resequencing and reassignment must also be imparted to remote bidders in real time. A reader skilled in the art of implementing Internet-based commerce media will appreciate that implementation of Internet-based live auctions involves a far more complex and technologically demanding solution than implementation of the silent auction model diagrammed in
The DLA auction server 312 may be implemented on one or more high-end server PCs, workstations, mini-computers, or mainframes. The DLA auction server 312 incorporates the incoming status information from the DLA human proxy 306 into a database representation of the instantaneous state of the auction, and, at the same time, broadcasts status updates via the Internet 314 to a number of remote bidders 316–319. The remote bidders 316–319 monitor the live auction via the status information broadcast from the DLA auction server 312, and may also listen to the auction via real-time audio broadcast of the live auction or watch the auction via real-time video broadcast of the live auction captured by one or more recording devices (not shown) and transmitted to the remote bidders via the Internet or possibly through other communications media, including cable TV and radio. The remote bidders may submit bids for particular items in real-time, just as if they were present, in-person, in the audience 302.
Remote bidders submit a bid via the DLA client program running on the remote bidders' computer system, for example computer system 320, which are then transmitted via the Internet 314 to the auction server 312. Remote bids are filtered and verified by the DLA system so that only valid bids from authorized remote bidders are transmitted by the DLA auction server 312 to the DLA human proxy 306 via the Internet 310 and the DLA auction console running the DLA human proxy's computer DLA 308.
Upon receiving a remote bid from a remote bidder, the DLA human proxy 306 may then interact with the auctioneer 304 to submit the bid. If the bid is accepted, that fact, like any other status information concerning the live auction, is submitted by the DLA human proxy 306 via the DLA auction console running on the DLA human proxy's computer 308 and the Internet 310 to the DLA auction server 312 for subsequent broadcast to the remote bidders 316–319. In order for the remote bidders to effectively participate in the live auction, the remote bidders need to receive status updates from the live auction in time periods on the order of a second or less, and, in the same time interval, need to be able to submit bids that appear on the DLA auction console running on the DLA human proxy's computer 308.
Many thousands or hundreds of thousands of remote bidders may participate in a given auction. The DLA must therefore incorporate technology to enable status information concerning an ongoing auction to be broadcast, in real-time, to the remote bidders and to enable bids to be transmitted from the remote bidders, in real-time, to the auction console program running as the on-site computer 402. The preferred embodiment for this technology is illustrated in
Each root-level redistributor node, for example collector/redistributor node 412, is connected via a communications network, for example communications network 414, to a next-lower-level set of collector/redistributor nodes, for example collector/redistributor nodes 418 and 420. In
The collector/redistributor nodes and the server computer 404 are interconnected by high-speed network communications 410 and 416. Thus, status information may travel from the on-site computer 402 to a remote bidders' computer, for example remote bidders' computer 428, via an initial Internet connection 406, a series of high-speed communications network transfers 410 and 416, and a second connection 440. The TCP/IP connections of the collector/redistributor nodes are multiplexed through a single port, using a multiplexer, because serially sending status information to remote bidders' computers via one or a small number of processes from the server computer 404 would be far too slow for the purposes of informed remote bidder participation in the live auction. Similarly, the hierarchical interconnection of collector/redistributor nodes allows for filtering bids, using a variety of criteria, including lot and auction ID verification, bid value, and various bid inventory checks.
The bid inventory checks include checks to make sure that there is sufficient inventory available for a particular bid and to make sure the bid meets minimum inventory requirements established on the floor by the auctioneer, e.g. minimum quantities in quantity lots. Only valid bids with the highest detected bid prices submitted by the remote bidders' computers connected to a particular collector/redistributor node are propagated back towards the server computer 404. This greatly reduces network traffic and message handling in upstream collector/redistributor nodes, the server computer 404, and the on-site computer 402.
The first registration screen 510 includes text entry boxes for the user to select a user ID and password with which to subsequently login to the DLA system. Alternatively, the user ID and password may be generated by the DLA based on information provided in subsequent screens shown in
In step 518, the prospective client fills out the second registration form 516 and returns it to the DLA. In optional step 520, the DLA may elect to request additional information from the prospective client via a third registration screen 522. Step 520 is optional in that all pertinent information may be acquired by the DLA via a single screen. On the other hand, additional optional steps, such as step 520, may be necessary to collect further information in other cases. Additional information may include credit card numbers, bank account numbers, employer names and addresses, phone numbers and other such information. All the information provided by the client to the DLA will be maintained by the DLA in one or more databases. The DLA can then use the stored information to facilitate the client's subsequent registration for particular auctions, to be discussed below.
In general, the DLA strives to collect a reasonable superset of information during the registration process commonly required by various auction houses and auction management organizations. By collecting the information initially, and saving the information, the DLA can then automatically retrieve the stored information and supply retrieved information to auction houses and auction management organizations when the client subsequently registers for a particular auction. Subsequent auction registrations may require certain specialized information particular to a particular auction house or auction management organization, or may require updates or modifications of information originally supplied by the client during the registration process.
In step 524, the client finishes entering the requested information into the text entry fields of the data collection screen 522 and indicates, via a push button click or some other indication technique, that the information should be returned to the DLA. In step 526, the DLA sends terms and conditions information that is displayed to the client in a terms and conditions screen 528. The terms and conditions screen represents an agreement, or contract, between the prospective client and the DLA, to which the prospective client can either agree or disagree by clicking on an appropriate user interface object. The prospective client then, in step 528, returns the prospective client's agreement or disagreement to the terms and conditions to the DLA.
There are many alternative steps that may occur in the registration transaction depending on the prospective client's responses. For example, if the client disagrees with the terms and conditions, the DLA may return a screen indicating that the prospective client has not been accepted for registration with the DLA. In the case the client agrees with the terms and conditions, the DLA may return information displayed to the client in additional screens that indicate that the DLA has registered the prospective client as an DLA client and additional informational screens showing the DLA client how to best use the DLA system. Further back in the transaction, the DLA may short circuit a number of steps and reject a prospective client if the credit information, for example, is not verifiable or is inadequate. Finally, at the completion of the registration process, the DLA may download the DLA client program to the new DLA client's computer to allow the client to subsequently interact with the DLA.
Each auction listed in the list of auctions displayed to the client 606 is associated with a status. Different types of statuses include: (1) “sign-up,” a status indicating that the client has not yet attempted to register for the particular auction; (2) “approved,” a status indicating that the client has successfully registered for the auction; (3) “denied,” a status indicating that the client has attempted to register for the auction, but was denied registration for one of various reasons, including inadequate credit or failure to agree to terms and conditions; and (4) “waiting,” a status indicating that the client attempted to register for the auction and that DLA has yet to respond with an approval or denial.
In step 608, the client selects an auction and indicates that the client wishes to attempt to register or re-register for a particular auction by clicking on the status associated with the auction. In step 610, the DLA may then return a data collection screen 612 requesting any additional or particularized information needed from the client in order to register the client for the selected auction. In step 614, the client fills in the requested information into text entry fields, or alternatively, selects various alternatives via user interface selection objects, and returns the information to the DLA. In step 616, the DLA may return a special terms and conditions form to a client for the selected auction, to which the client may agree or disagree in step 618. The exchanges represented by steps 1610 and 1614 and by steps 1616 and 1618 may not be necessary in many cases.
It may often be the case that the client provides sufficient information in the registration process so that the DLA may automatically retrieve the previously submitted information from the DLA database and furnish that information to the auction house or auction management organization. Similarly, the initial terms and conditions agreement made by the client during the registration process may be sufficient for a large number of auction houses or auction management organizations, thus obviating the need for a specialized or particularized terms and conditions step related to a particular auction. In step 620, the DLA client program redisplays the list of auctions 622 previously displayed in screen 606, updated with new or additional status information provided to the DLA client program by the DLA. For example, the client request for registration for an auction may be quickly approved, resulting in the status for that auction being displayed as “approved,” rather than as “sign-up” or “denied.” There may be additional steps in alternative embodiments and implementations of the client auction registration transaction, and additional outcomes for each step depending on information supplied by the client to the DLA.
In step 712, the client selects particular categories of lots and returns the selection to the DLA. In step 714, the DLA returns a list of lots pertaining to the selected category displayed to the user via screen 716 by the DLA client program. From this list of lots, the client selects a particular lot and returns the selection to the DLA in step 718. In step 720, the DLA returns a description the lot to the DLA client program, which then displays textual, graphical, or a combination of textual and graphical information concerning the selected lot to the client in an informational screen 722. The informational screen 722 may include a user interface object allowing the client to indicate a desire to submit a pre-bid for the selected lot.
If the client selects to pre-bid on the lot, the client returns the indication for a desire to pre-bid on the lot to the DLA in step 722. In response, the DLA returns information concerning the pre-bid state of the lot to the DLA client program, which displays the information in a pre-bid screen 726 to the client. The pre-bid screen 726 allows the client to enter information, including a bid price, to return to the DLA in step 728. Additional navigational user interface objects allow the client to navigate back to the auction list and select a different category, or to navigate back to the list of lots or to the informational screen 722. Thus, the client is able to browse through the inventory of lots to be offered for sale at a particular auction, and to pre-bid on those lots offering a pre-bid option.
Once the DLA has verified the client's prior registration for the auction, or alternatively, conducts an auction registration dialogue with the client, the DLA client program displays an auction status screen 808 and the client is continuously updated by status information received from the DLA auction console via the DLA auction server program in steps 810, 812, and 814. The status information messages are received by the DLA client program from the DLA as frequently as the status of the live auction is updated by the DLA human proxy's manipulation of the DLA auction console user interface, or as fast as automatic status updates are generated by incoming Internet bids. The client's auction status screen is continuously being updated to reflect the new asking price. If the remote bidder using the DLA client program wishes to submit a bid, he or she clicks a bid button 818, resulting in submission of a bid whose value is equivalent to the current asking price displayed on the client's auction status screen.
Once the bid button 818 is clicked, the DLA client program sends a bid message via the Internet to a front-line collector/redistributor node in step 820. The bid is filtered through the DLA and may end up displayed to the DLA human proxy on the DLA auction console. If the client's bid is presented by the DLA human proxy and accepted by the auctioneer, that acceptance will be reflected to the client by subsequent update of the auction status screen 808 via reception by the DLA client program of a subsequent status message from the DLA. If the client's bid is a winning bid, then the client's auction registration information is submitted to the auction house or auction management organization, and the client is notified via the action status screen 808, and additionally notified by other communications methods including e-mail, a telephone call, or some other method. Note that the client who submits a winning bid is contractually bound to submit payment for the good or service, just as a member of the audience present at the site of the live auction is bound to honor a winning bid.
In a preferred embodiment, the DLA auction console consists of a Java 1.02 applet running in a web browser, either Internet Explorer or Netscape Navigator/Communicator. It maintains a continuous connection with the central auction server to transmit and receive information in real time. The DLA auction console displays the user interface shown in
The center of the user interface consists of an array of buttons 906 used to establish a current bid, a bid increment, and an asking bid. These values can also be typed in directly. Along the top of the user interface is a group of six buttons, including: “Fair Warning” 908, “Last Chance” 910, “Sold” 912, and “Pass” 914. These buttons are used by the human proxy to set specific status flags that are sent to the DLA auction server, and subsequently by the DLA auction server to remote bidders, and are also displayed on the right-hand status readout. The button “Sold Local” 916 sets the sold status flag with the last recorded value from a local bidder, and the button “Next Item” 918 indicates to the server that the next lot number in sequence should be loaded. If an out-of-sequence lot is detected by the human proxy, the human proxy can utilize the text entry field “jump to” 920 to enter a lot number to tell the DLA auction server to load the description and details for a different lot. Using the flash text list of buttons arranged in a column 922 on the left of the user interface, the DLA human proxy can choose to send to the DLA auction server informational or flavor text selected from a series of canned phrases designated ahead of time by the auction house. If none of the canned phrases are appropriate, a text message can be entered and sent by the DLA human proxy using the text entry field 924. Future enhancements will include the capability to group and re-lot lots, as well as a predictive capability to automatically determine the next asking price from current asking price intervals.
The status message contains the following fields: (1) a message identity field 1006 that indicates the type of message, in this case, a status message; (2) an auction ID field 1008 contains a unique identifier for the auction to which the status message pertains; (3) a lot ID field 1010 that contains a unique identifier for the lot currently being auctioned at the auction identified by the auction ID identifier in the auction ID field 1008; (4) an ask field 1012 that contains the asking price for the lot identified by the lot ID in the lot ID field 1010; (5) a high bid field 1014 containing the highest bid received for the lot identified by contents of the lot ID field 1010; (6) a high bidder field 1016 that indicates the identity of the bidder who submitted the high bid contained the high bid field 1014, where the high bidder may be either a member of the audience present at the live auction or a remote bidder; (7) a status field 1018 that contains the current status for the lot identified in the lot ID field 1010, where the different possible statuses are the active statuses illustrated above in
The bid message 1102 contains the following fields: (1) a message identifier field 1106 text contains an indication of the type of the message, in this case, a bid message; (2) an auction ID field 1108 similar to the auction ID field 1008 of the status message 1002; (3) a lot ID field 1110 similar to the lot ID field 1010 of the status message 1002; a bidder field 1112 that contains a unique identifier for the remote identifier that submitted the bid that generated the bid message; (5) a bid field 1114 that contains the bid price submitted by the bidder and the bid that generated the bid message; and (6) a desired inventory field 1116 that contains the bidder's desired inventory for a composite lot. Bid messages are generated by the DLA client program running on remote bidders' computers and sent via the DLA system to the DLA human proxy.
In this subsection, four basic components of the DLA system, including the DLA client program, the collector/redistributor node, the DLA auction server program, and the DLA auction console program, will be described in block diagrams and in flow control diagram. These descriptions represent a preferred embodiment, but by no means the single possible embodiment of the DLA system. The component software program may be implemented in many different ways in many different languages and run on many different types of computers featuring different operating systems. Functionalities encapsulated in one particular component in the preferred embodiment may be, in alternate embodiments, implemented in different components. In alternate embodiments, a different number of basic DLA components may be employed to implement the DLA auction methodology described above
Also in step 1504, the collector/redistributor checks the bid amount contained in the bid field of the bid message against the current high bid received for the identified lot of the identified auction. Only if the bid is higher than the current highest bid for the identified auction, as detected by the collector/redistributor from bid messages received from other remote bidders or from status messages received from the DLA auction server, will the collector/redistributor forward the bid on to the DLA auction server. If the bid is valid and represents a higher bid, as detected in step 1506, the collector/redistributor submits the bid to either a next-highest-level collector/redistributor or to the DLA auction server in step 1508, after which the collector/redistributor continues to wait for another event. On the other hand, if the bid does not pass the filter, as detected in step 1506, the collector/redistributor simply resumes waiting for another event. The collector/redistributor node may employ a hash table containing auction ID, lot ID, and high bid triples in order to facilitate rapid filtering of a bid. If the collector/redistributor receives a status message from the DLA auction server program, as detected in step 1510, the collector/redistributor calls the routine “process status” in step 1512 to process the status message, and then resumes waiting for another event. If the collector/redistributor is a first-line collector/redistributor, and the collector/redistributor receives a request from a DLA client program to connect to an ongoing auction, as detected in step 1514, the collector/redistributor validates the DLA client program against the validation database in step 1516. If the DLA client program, and remote bidder that has invoked it, is properly authorized, as detected in step 1518, the collector/redistributor accepts the connection and places a unique client identifier associated with an auction ID into an active client list in step 1520, and then resumes waiting for another event. If, on the other hand, the collector/redistributor determines that the client is not authorized to participate in the desired auction, as detected in step 1518, then the collector/redistributor refuses the connection request in step 1522 and resumes waiting for another event. If the collector/redistributor receives a client request to terminate connection to an auction, as detected in step 1524, the collector/redistributor removes the client from the active client list in step 1526 and resumes waiting for another event.
If the collector/redistributor receives a message from the DLA auction server indicating that an auction has finished, as detected in step 1528, the collector/redistributor removes the auction ID from the list of active auction ID's in step 1530 and then resumes waiting for another event. If the collector/redistributor receives an auction starting message from the DLA auction server, as detected in step 1532, the collector/redistributor adds the ID of the starting auction to a list of active auction ID's in step 1534, and then resumes waiting for another event. On the other hand, if none of the above-mentioned events are identified, as indicated by the negative output in step 1532, the collector/redistributor simply continues to wait for another event.
In step 1608, the collector/redistributor checks the lot number in the status message against the current lot number for the auction identified by the auction ID included in the status message. If the lot number is a new lot number, or, in other words, if the lot number in the status message does not correspond to the current lot number associated with the auction in the active auction list maintained by the collector/redistributor, as detected in step 1610, the collector/redistributor updates the current lot number for the auction identified by the auction ID in the active auction list maintained by the collector/redistributor in step 1612. For choice and quantity lots, the process “status,” in step 1608, also reads the available inventory from the incoming status message in order to subsequently compare the desired inventory of the incoming bids to the currently available inventory to make sure that the incoming bids have enough inventory to meet the conditions set by the auctioneer on the floor, e.g. a declaration of “one money!” indicating that all the items in the lot must be sold at once, and to make sure that lots have enough inventory for the bidders, e.g. a bidder that will take no less than 100 units in a quantity lot may not submit a bid for which there are only 90 units left. These additional filter conditions for choice and quantity lots are carried out in step 1505 of
If the DLA auction server program receives one of a number of different types of sync messages from a DLA auction console program, as detected in step 1814, the DLA auction server program calls the routine “sync,” in step 1816, to handle the sync messages and then resumes waiting for another event. In some cases, the DLA auction server generates status messages upon receiving certain sync messages, and forwards the status messages on to remote bidders via the collector/redistributor nodes. If, for example, the DLA auction server receives a “Next Lot” or “Pass” sync message from the console, it forwards the lot cursor to the next lot and generates a new status message. As another example, if the DLA auction server receives a “Console State” sync message from the console, it sets the state of the lot to that state and generates a new status message to the clients, where the states may include certain of the active states discussed above with reference to
If the DLA auction server receives a “Flash Text” sync message from the console, it sets a flash text field for the lot to that flash text message and generates a new status message to the clients. If the DLA auction server receives a “Jump Lot” sync message from the console, it sets a lot cursor to the new lot and generates a new status message to the clients. These various types of sync messages are handled by the routine “sync,” called in step 1816. That routine essentially maintains the correspondence between the computational image of live auctions stored in the DLA database and the live auctions via the incoming sync messages from the DLA auction console, and generates status messages, when necessary, to update the auction status screen displayed to remote bidders.
If the DLA auction server program receives an end of auction message from an DLA auction console program, as detected in step 1818, the DLA auction server program removes the indicated auction ID from the list of active auction IDs sends an end of auction message to all root-level collector/redistributor nodes in step 1820, and then resumes waiting for another event. If the DLA auction server program receives a termination indication as detected in step 1820, then the DLA auction server program terminates, in step 1822. Otherwise, the DLA auction server resumes waiting for another event.
If the DLA auction console program receives an indication from the console screen of the start of an auction, as detected in step 2216, the DLA auction console program sends a start of auction message to the auction server, in step 2218 and then resumes waiting for another event. If the DLA auction console program receives an indication of the end of an auction, as detected in step 2220, the DLA auction console program sends an end of auction message to the DLA auction server program in step 2222 and resumes waiting for another event. If the DLA auction console program receives a resync request from the DLA auction server, as detected in step 2224, then the DLA auction console program calls a “resync” routine to undertake and complete a resync dialog with the DLA auction server program in step 2226. The resync routine facilitates an exchange of sync messages, and will not be discussed further. If the DLA auction console program receives a termination indication, as detected in step 2228, the DLA auction console program terminates in step 2230. Otherwise, the DLA auction console program resumes waiting for another event.
Although the present invention has been described in terms of preferred embodiments, it is not intended that the invention be limited to these embodiments. Modifications within the spirit of the invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art. For example, different numbers and types of basic components may be employed to implement the DLA system. Software components may be implemented in many different languages to run on different types of computers that provide different operating system interfaces. Many different types of databases and data schemas can be employed to implement the DLA database to which the DLA auction server interfaces, as well as the client validation databases used by the first-line collector/redistributor nodes. Different types of graphical user displays may be employed to interface with remote bidders and DLA human proxies, and different orderings of transaction steps may be supported. In the future, data transmission media other then the Internet may be used to interconnect the remote bidders to the DLA system and interconnect the DLA auction consoles with the DLA auction server. Already, much higher-bandwidth communications media have been designed and planned for. In addition, the remote bidders may interact with a communications device other than a remote computer, including Internet-enhanced, interactive cable television or even more capable and technologically advanced devices. Ultimately, the auction console may be integrated more closely with the auction process, perhaps displayed to the auctioneer and directly controlled by the auctioneer. Alternatively, the auction console may eventually have the capability of monitoring the auction process itself, without the need for a human proxy.
The foregoing description, for purposes of explanation, used specific nomenclature to provide a thorough understanding of the invention. However, it will be apparent to one skilled in the art that the specific details are not required in order to practice the invention. The foregoing descriptions of specific embodiments of the present invention are presented for purpose of illustration and description. They are not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise forms disclosed. Obviously many modifications and variations are possible in view of the above teachings. The embodiments are shown and described in order to best explain the principles of the invention and its practical applications, to thereby enable others skilled in the art to best utilize the invention and various embodiments with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated. It is intended that the scope of the invention be defined by the following claims and their equivalents:
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US4789928 *||Jan 30, 1987||Dec 6, 1988||Flex Japan Inc.||Auction information transmission processing|
|US5077665||May 25, 1989||Dec 31, 1991||Reuters Limited||Distributed matching system|
|US5640569||Apr 28, 1995||Jun 17, 1997||Sun Microsystems, Inc.||Diverse goods arbitration system and method for allocating resources in a distributed computer system|
|US5684863||Jun 7, 1995||Nov 4, 1997||Ronald A. Katz, Technology Lic. L.P.||Telephonic-interface statistical analysis system|
|US5696901||May 24, 1996||Dec 9, 1997||Konrad; Allan M.||Remote information service access system based on a client-server-service model|
|US5794207||Sep 4, 1996||Aug 11, 1998||Walker Asset Management Limited Partnership||Method and apparatus for a cryptographically assisted commercial network system designed to facilitate buyer-driven conditional purchase offers|
|US5794219||Feb 20, 1996||Aug 11, 1998||Health Hero Network, Inc.||Method of conducting an on-line auction with bid pooling|
|US5818914||Mar 27, 1995||Oct 6, 1998||Aucnet Inc.||Auction information transmission processing system|
|US5835896||Mar 29, 1996||Nov 10, 1998||Onsale, Inc.||Method and system for processing and transmitting electronic auction information|
|US5845265||Nov 7, 1995||Dec 1, 1998||Mercexchange, L.L.C.||Consignment nodes|
|US5873071||May 15, 1997||Feb 16, 1999||Itg Inc.||Computer method and system for intermediated exchange of commodities|
|US5890138||Aug 26, 1996||Mar 30, 1999||Bid.Com International Inc.||Computer auction system|
|US5905975||Jan 2, 1997||May 18, 1999||Ausubel; Lawrence M.||Computer implemented methods and apparatus for auctions|
|US6012045||Jul 1, 1997||Jan 4, 2000||Barzilai; Nizan||Computer-based electronic bid, auction and sale system, and a system to teach new/non-registered customers how bidding, auction purchasing works|
|US6018721||May 19, 1997||Jan 25, 2000||Citibank, N.A.||Method and system for improved collateral monitoring and control|
|US6023686||Jun 5, 1998||Feb 8, 2000||Health Hero Network||Method for conducting an on-line bidding session with bid pooling|
|US6058379||Jul 11, 1997||May 2, 2000||Auction Source, L.L.C.||Real-time network exchange with seller specified exchange parameters and interactive seller participation|
|US6243691 *||Mar 29, 1996||Jun 5, 2001||Onsale, Inc.||Method and system for processing and transmitting electronic auction information|
|US6449601 *||Dec 30, 1998||Sep 10, 2002||Amazon.Com, Inc.||Distributed live auction|
|US7162446||Dec 8, 1999||Jan 9, 2007||Ebay Inc.||Integrated auction|
|EP0628920A1||Jun 8, 1994||Dec 14, 1994||Nieaf-Smitt B.V.||Auctioning system|
|EP0716386A2||Dec 5, 1995||Jun 12, 1996||Aucnet Inc.||Auction information transmission processing system|
|EP0828223A2||Sep 1, 1997||Mar 11, 1998||Hitachi, Ltd.||Automatic auction method|
|JP2000113070A||Title not available|
|WO1998034187A1||Jan 30, 1998||Aug 6, 1998||Autocom Aps||A method of holding an auction and uses of the method|
|WO1999063461A1||May 20, 1999||Dec 9, 1999||David Lionel Dinwoodie||Interactive remote auction bidding system|
|WO2000039735A2||Dec 28, 1999||Jul 6, 2000||Livebid.Com||Bid message processing for real-time auctions|
|1||"Auction house moves for Internet business," Internet Business News, p. 1, Dialog File 636, Access No. 02809791, dated Aug. 1995.|
|2||"Auction Universe Expands to Bring Thousands More Auctioneers online," PR Newswire, pp. 1-2, Dialog 16, Access No. 05889248, dated Oct. 1998.|
|3||"Bid.com Announces www.dutchauction.com," Business Wire, pp. 1-2, Dialog File 16, Access No. 05914806, dated Oct. 1998.|
|4||"Cyberauctions: Going Once, going twice . . . ," Interactive Marketing News, v2, n13, pp. 1-2, Dialog File 636, Access No. 02771147, dated Jun. 1995.|
|5||"Insurance Auto Auctions, Inc. Unveils Internet auction for salvage vehicles," PR Newswire, pp. 1-2, Dialog 621, Access No. 02087129, dated Jan. 2000.|
|6||"LiveBid.com sells entire historic town over the internet," Busniess Wire, p. 1, Dialog File 16, Access No. 0587175, dated Sep. 1998.|
|7||"Moai Technologies Announces LiveExchange 2.1," PR Newswire, pp. 1-2, Dialog File 20, Access No. 02803594, dated Sep. 1998.|
|8||"UK's auction channel uses interactive voice technology," Newsbytes, pp. 1-2, Dialog, File 636, Access No. 03768081, dated Dec. 1997.|
|9||Cooper, J., Going going gone! Tradition gives way to technology. (Sotheby's and interactive television), dated Mar. 1990.|
|10||Derwent-Acc-No: 2000-43 1419; Handler B.A.; Jun. 2000.|
|11||Dunlap, C., "Going once, going twice . . . sold!," Computer Reseller News, pp. 1-2, Dialog File 15, Access No. 01544740, dated Dec. 1997.|
|12||Innerlinx Technologies selected to present LiveBid.com at Red Herring Forum, PR Newswire, p. 1, Dialog File 148, Access No. 10178492, dated May 1998.|
|13||Preist, C., and Van Tol, M., "Adaptive Agents in a Persistent Shout Double Auction," ACM Digital Library, pp. 11-18, dated Oct. 1998.|
|14||*||Spang, Kelly. "Virtual-Market Matchmaker". Computer Reseller News. Manhasset:: Jun. 1, 1998, Iss. 791, p. 220 (4 pages).|
|15||*||Swardson, Anne. "The Web, Doing One's Bidding; At a Paris Auction, a Flick of the Wrist or a Click of the Mouse". The Washington Post. Washington, D.C. Feb. 21, 1997. p. B2. (4 pages).|
|16||USENET posting dated Jun. 22, 1998, titled "Greetings and salutations. Are you familiar with auctions?" regarding Auctionwatch.|
|17||Wurman, P., Wellman, M., and Walsh, W., "The Michigan Internet AuctionBot: A Configurable Auction Server for Human and Software Agents," In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Autonomous Agents, pp. 301-308, dated May 1998.|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US7627500 *||Dec 1, 2009||Sap Ag||Method and system for verifying quantities for enhanced network-based auctions|
|US7783520||Aug 24, 2010||Sap Ag||Methods of accessing information for listing a product on a network based auction service|
|US7788160 *||Aug 31, 2010||Sap Ag||Method and system for configurable options in enhanced network-based auctions|
|US7835977||Oct 31, 2006||Nov 16, 2010||Sap Ag||Method and system for generating an auction using a template in an integrated internal auction system|
|US7860749||Jan 3, 2005||Dec 28, 2010||Sap Ag||Method, medium and system for customizable homepages for network-based auctions|
|US7877313||Jan 25, 2011||Sap Ag||Method and system for a failure recovery framework for interfacing with network-based auctions|
|US7895115||Oct 31, 2006||Feb 22, 2011||Sap Ag||Method and system for implementing multiple auctions for a product on a seller's E-commerce site|
|US8024251 *||Sep 10, 2008||Sep 20, 2011||Goldman Sachs & Co.||Bond issue risk management|
|US8095428||Jan 10, 2012||Sap Ag||Method, system, and medium for winning bid evaluation in an auction|
|US8095449||Jan 10, 2012||Sap Ag||Method and system for generating an auction using a product catalog in an integrated internal auction system|
|US8386331||Mar 4, 2011||Feb 26, 2013||Lanechamp, Inc.||Method for providing vehicle information at a live auction|
|US8433609||Dec 5, 2011||Apr 30, 2013||Raj Vasant Abhyanker||Geospatially constrained gastronomic bidding|
|US8571951 *||Apr 25, 2006||Oct 29, 2013||Leadpoint, Inc.||Automated attachment of segmentation data to hot contact leads for facilitating matching of leads to interested lead buyers|
|US8805734||Oct 28, 2013||Aug 12, 2014||Leadpoint, Inc.||Automated attachment of segmentation data to hot contact leads for facilitating matching of leads to interested lead buyers|
|US8812389 *||Jun 8, 2011||Aug 19, 2014||David MacMahan||System and method of listing and dividing assets between two or more parties|
|US20040006530 *||Jul 3, 2003||Jan 8, 2004||Freemarkets, Inc.||Automated lotting|
|US20050234803 *||Jan 3, 2005||Oct 20, 2005||Zhong Zhang||Method and system for verifying quantities for enhanced network-based auctions|
|US20050246266 *||Jul 7, 2005||Nov 3, 2005||Zeljko Stefanovic||System and apparatus for hosting combined online and live auctions|
|US20050273420 *||Jan 3, 2005||Dec 8, 2005||Lenin Subramanian||Method and system for customizable homepages for network-based auctions|
|US20060004647 *||Jan 3, 2005||Jan 5, 2006||Guruprasad Srinivasamurthy||Method and system for configurable options in enhanced network-based auctions|
|US20060004648 *||Jan 3, 2005||Jan 5, 2006||Narinder Singh||Method and system for using templates for enhanced network-based auctions|
|US20060265259 *||Apr 25, 2006||Nov 23, 2006||Marc Diana||Automated attachment of segmentation data to hot contact leads for facilitating matching of leads to interested lead buyers|
|US20070106595 *||Oct 31, 2006||May 10, 2007||Sap Ag||Monitoring tool for integrated product ordering/fulfillment center and auction system|
|US20070106596 *||Oct 31, 2006||May 10, 2007||Sap Ag||Method and system for implementing multiple auctions for a product on a seller's e-commerce site|
|US20070106597 *||Oct 31, 2006||May 10, 2007||Narinder Singh||Method and system for generating an auction using a template in an integrated internal auction system|
|US20070143205 *||Oct 31, 2006||Jun 21, 2007||Sap Ag||Method and system for implementing configurable order options for integrated auction services on a seller's e-commerce site|
|US20070143206 *||Oct 31, 2006||Jun 21, 2007||Sap Ag||Method and system for generating an auction using a product catalog in an integrated internal auction system|
|US20070150406 *||Oct 31, 2006||Jun 28, 2007||Sap Ag||Bidder monitoring tool for integrated auction and product ordering system|
|US20080235115 *||May 28, 2008||Sep 25, 2008||Worldwide Farm Equipment Auctions.Com Ltd.||System and method for hosting combined online and live auctions|
|US20090012907 *||Sep 10, 2008||Jan 8, 2009||Goldman Sachs & Co.||Bond issue risk management|
|US20100088213 *||Oct 7, 2008||Apr 8, 2010||Czupek Andrew P||System and method for matching one or more incoming order to a standing order based on multiple order priority|
|US20110161193 *||Jun 30, 2011||Heppe George E||Method for providing vehicle information at a live auction|
|US20110302071 *||Dec 8, 2011||Divvymaster, Inc||System and Method Of Listing And Dividing Assets Between Two Or More Parties|
|USRE42300||Apr 19, 2011||George E. Heppe||Method for providing vehicle information at a live auction|
|U.S. Classification||705/37, 705/80|
|International Classification||G06Q50/18, G06Q30/08, G06F17/00|
|Cooperative Classification||G06Q50/188, G06Q40/04, G06Q30/08|
|European Classification||G06Q30/08, G06Q50/188, G06Q40/04|
|Oct 19, 2010||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|Nov 10, 2014||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 8
|Jan 8, 2015||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: AMAZON TECHNOLOGIES, INC., WASHINGTON
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:AMAZON.COM, INC.;REEL/FRAME:034742/0773
Effective date: 20150107