|Publication number||US7222673 B2|
|Application number||US 10/948,431|
|Publication date||May 29, 2007|
|Filing date||Sep 23, 2004|
|Priority date||Sep 23, 2004|
|Also published as||CA2590423A1, CA2590423C, CN101052780A, CN101052780B, EP1807604A2, EP1807604A4, US20060060356, WO2006036575A2, WO2006036575A3|
|Publication number||10948431, 948431, US 7222673 B2, US 7222673B2, US-B2-7222673, US7222673 B2, US7222673B2|
|Inventors||Arne Graue, Bjorn Kvamme, David R. Zornes, James C. Stevens, James J. Howard, Bernard A. Baldwin|
|Original Assignee||Conocophilips Company|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (10), Referenced by (21), Classifications (18), Legal Events (8)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
1. Field of the Invention
One aspect of this invention relates to the production of hydrocarbons from subterranean formations. In another aspect, the invention concerns a method of recovering free gas from naturally-occurring gas hydrate deposits. In a further aspect, the invention involves a process of sequestering greenhouse gases in subterranean formations.
2. Description of the Prior Art
Gas hydrates are crystalline solids composed of gas molecules surrounded by cages of water molecules. These gas molecules are usually light hydrocarbons (C1–C4). Gas hydrates form a solid phase above and below the pressure and temperature conditions required to form ice. Gas hydrates historically have been considered a nuisance in the oil industry because of their spontaneous formation in oil and gas pipelines, which would hamper the flow of oil within the pipeline.
However, naturally-occurring gas hydrate deposits have become the focus of attention in recent years as an alternative fuel source for the energy industry. Large, naturally-occurring gas hydrate deposits are found near many existing oil deposits, along with non-traditional reservoirs found in permafrost and shallow buried sediments in deep-sea environments. Some sources estimate that in the United States alone, the amount of methane contained within natural methane hydrate deposits is 200 times the amount existing as free methane in natural gas deposits. Furthermore, the amount of potential energy in natural gas hydrate deposits is estimated to be twice that of the currently existing oil, coal, and natural gas deposits combined.
Conventional methods of natural gas extraction from gas hydrates involve heating and/or depressurizing the gas hydrates in order to release the natural gas. However, there are two major problems with these conventional methods. First, they require a large amount of energy to be added to the system, resulting in a high cost of extraction. Second, they destabilize hydrate formations because both depressurization and heating cause the hydrate to melt. This can lead to the destabilization and/or collapse of sediments that contain hydrates and other nearby subterranean formations. Because gas hydrates are usually extracted near oil and natural gas deposits, such instability can result in problems with the extraction of oil and natural gas.
An existing problem, unrelated to the extraction of gas hydrates, concerns the release of greenhouse gases into the Earth's atmosphere. A variety of current industrial processes produce excess greenhouse gases, especially carbon dioxide, that may contribute to the catastrophic climate changes if continually released into the atmosphere. However, disposal of the excess greenhouse gases in a manner that permanently prevents release of the gases can be quite expensive. Thus, it would be desirable to provide a new method of sequestering greenhouse gases, such as carbon dioxide, that is more effective and economical than previous disposal methods.
Responsive to these and other problems, an object of the present invention is to provide a more efficient and effective method for recovering gas from natural gas hydrates.
A further object of the present invention is to provide a method of recovering gas from natural gas hydrates that does not require significant heating or depressurization of the natural gas hydrates.
Another object of the present invention is to provide a method of recovering gas from natural gas hydrates that does not destabilize the hydrate formation.
A still further object of the present invention is to provide a method for permanently sequestering large quantities of carbon dioxide.
It should be noted that not all of the above-listed objects need be accomplished by the invention claimed herein and other objects and advantages of this invention will be apparent from the following description of the invention and appended claims.
In accordance with one embodiment of the present invention, there is provided a process that releases hydrocarbons from a natural gas hydrate formation without significant melting of the natural gas hydrate formation.
In accordance with another embodiment of the invention, there is provided a method for releasing hydrocarbons from a gas hydrate comprising a hydrocarbon bound with solid-state water. The inventive method includes substituting a releasing agent for the hydrocarbon to release the hydrocarbon from the solid-state water, thereby providing a substituted hydrate comprising the releasing agent bound with the solid-state water.
In accordance with still another embodiment of the invention, there is provided a method for producing hydrocarbons from subterranean gas hydrates located proximate to a subterranean channel. The method includes (a) introducing a releasing agent into the subterranean channel; (b) causing the releasing agent to contact the gas hydrate, thereby releasing a hydrocarbon into the channel without melting the gas hydrate; and (c) recovering the released hydrocarbon from the channel.
Preferred embodiments of the invention are described in detail below with reference to the attached drawing figures, wherein:
In accordance with the present invention, gas is removed from a gas hydrate by contacting the hydrate with a releasing agent. When the releasing agent contacts the gas hydrate, the releasing agent spontaneously replaces the gas within the hydrate structure. This spontaneous substitution of the releasing agent for the gas in the hydrate structure frees the gas from the hydrate structure without melting the hydrate structure.
The gas hydrate contacted with the releasing agent preferably comprises a hydrocarbon bound within solid-state water. More preferably, the gas hydrate is a light hydrocarbon (C1–C4) hydrate. Most preferably, the gas hydrate is a methane hydrate. In one embodiment, the gas hydrate is a naturally-occurring hydrate contained within a porous subterranean formation. This formation could include porous rock or sediments that are associated with the proper pressure and temperature conditions necessary to form natural gas hydrates.
The releasing agent contacted with the gas hydrate is preferably a compound that forms a more thermodynamically stable hydrate structure than the gas originally contained within the hydrate structure, so the releasing agent spontaneously (i.e., without the need for added energy) replaces the gas within the hydrate without requiring a significant change in the temperature, pressure, or volume of the hydrate. The releasing agent hydrate, consisting of the releasing agent bound with solid-state water, is more thermodynamically stable than the original natural gas hydrate if the reaction which substitutes the releasing agent for the gas favors the formation of the releasing agent hydrate. The thermodynamic stability of the original natural gas hydrate and the releasing agent hydrate can be compared by calculating the Gibbs free energy value of the formation of each hydrate based on the heat of formation of the gas hydrate and the releasing agent hydrate at the natural conditions of the gas hydrate. If the Gibbs free energy value for the formation of the releasing agent hydrate is less than the Gibbs free energy value for the formation of the gas hydrate, then the reaction favors the releasing agent. Preferably, the Gibbs free energy value favors the formation of the releasing agent hydrate by at least about 2% over the formation of the gas hydrate, more preferably by at least about 5%, and most preferably by at least 10%. This replacement of the gas in the hydrate structure with the releasing agent frees the gas from the hydrate.
The relative thermodynamic stability of a releasing agent hydrate can also be determined by comparing its temperature and pressure stability ranges with that of the gas hydrate. If the releasing agent hydrate, at constant pressure, is stable at higher temperatures than the gas hydrate, and if at a constant temperature, the releasing hydrate is stable at lower pressures than the gas hydrate, then the releasing agent forms a thermodynamically more stable hydrate structure than the gas does. Thus, the use of such a releasing agent that forms a thermodynamically more stable hydrate can permit release of the gas without melting the hydrate and without destabilizing the hydrate structure. As a result, any temperature or pressure changes of the hydrate structure will be minimal, most likely less than 10% on a Celsius temperature scale and less than 10% on a Pascal pressure scale. In addition, since little or no melting of the hydrate occurs during replacement of the original gas with the releasing agent, any volume change will be minimal, most likely less than 10%.
The releasing agent contacting the gas hydrate is preferably a small, polar molecule whose size and chemical interaction with water molecules of the hydrate are such that the releasing agent forms the same or a similar hydrate structure as methane hydrate. The releasing agent is also preferably in the liquid phase when contacted with the gas hydrate. Preferably, the releasing agent has a molecular diameter in the range of from about 1 to about 8 angstroms, more preferably from 2 to 5 angstroms. It is further preferred that the molecular diameter of the releasing agent is within about 100% of the molecular diameter of methane, more preferably within 50% of the molecular diameter of methane. The releasing agent is preferably selected from the group consisting of carbon dioxide, nitrous oxide, and mixtures thereof. Most preferably, the releasing agent is carbon dioxide in the liquid phase. Mixtures of carbon dioxide with small amounts of other gases such as nitrogen, helium, and neon may also be used as the releasing agent. However, it is preferred for the releasing agent contacted with the gas hydrate to comprise at least about 50 mole percent carbon dioxide, more preferably at least 90 mole percent carbon dioxide. When the natural gas hydrate is contacted with the releasing agent, it is preferred that the releasing agent is at or near the same temperature as the original, natural gas hydrate, preferably within about 10° C. of the original natural gas hydrate temperature.
Referring now to
The present invention can be applied to the system represented in
The steps of injecting carbon dioxide into hydrate formation 30 and recovering the released methane can be repeated until the quantity of free methane gas recovered falls to a level that makes further recovery economically unfeasible. The above steps are preferably repeated until substantially all of the methane within the hydrate formation has been recovered. Because carbon dioxide is thermodynamically preferred to the methane within the hydrate formation, the formation does not have to be depressurized or heated in order to recover the methane. Consequently, the hydrate within the formation will not melt, and no destabilization of the hydrate formation will occur.
The description provided above with reference to
While this invention has been described in terms of the presently preferred embodiments, reasonable variations and modifications are possible to those skilled in the art and such variations are within the scope of the described invention and the appended claims.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US4920752 *||Dec 27, 1988||May 1, 1990||Sulzer Brothers Limited||Apparatus and process for storing hydrate-forming gaseous hydrocarbons|
|US5261490 *||Mar 3, 1992||Nov 16, 1993||Nkk Corporation||Method for dumping and disposing of carbon dioxide gas and apparatus therefor|
|US5950732||Mar 25, 1998||Sep 14, 1999||Syntroleum Corporation||System and method for hydrate recovery|
|US6028235||Oct 14, 1997||Feb 22, 2000||Mobil Oil Corporation||Gas hydrate regassification method and apparatus using steam or other heated gas or liquid|
|US6214175||Dec 26, 1996||Apr 10, 2001||Mobil Oil Corporation||Method for recovering gas from hydrates|
|US6267849||Jul 14, 2000||Jul 31, 2001||The United States Of America As Represented By The United States Department Of Energy||Method for the photocatalytic conversion of gas hydrates|
|US6978837 *||Jul 13, 2004||Dec 27, 2005||Yemington Charles R||Production of natural gas from hydrates|
|US20030178195||Mar 19, 2003||Sep 25, 2003||Agee Mark A.||Method and system for recovery and conversion of subsurface gas hydrates|
|US20040200618||Dec 4, 2003||Oct 14, 2004||Piekenbrock Eugene J.||Method of sequestering carbon dioxide while producing natural gas|
|JP2000061293A||Title not available|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US8201626||Dec 28, 2009||Jun 19, 2012||Chevron U.S.A. Inc.||Method and system for producing hydrocarbons from a hydrate reservoir using available waste heat|
|US8232438||Aug 25, 2008||Jul 31, 2012||Chevron U.S.A. Inc.||Method and system for jointly producing and processing hydrocarbons from natural gas hydrate and conventional hydrocarbon reservoirs|
|US8297356||Dec 22, 2009||Oct 30, 2012||Chevron U.S.A. Inc.||Method and system for producing hydrocarbons from a hydrate reservoir using a sweep gas|
|US8590619||Jan 22, 2010||Nov 26, 2013||Leibniz-Institut Fuer Meereswissenschaften||Method for producing natural gas from hydrocarbon hydrates while simultaneously storing carbon dioxide in geological formations|
|US8783364 *||Aug 25, 2006||Jul 22, 2014||Central Research Institute Of Electric Power Industry||Method for production, substitution, or mining of gas hydrate|
|US9291051||Oct 20, 2011||Mar 22, 2016||Conocophillips Company||Reservoir pressure testing to determine hydrate composition|
|US9322250||Aug 15, 2013||Apr 26, 2016||Baker Hughes Incorporated||System for gas hydrate production and method thereof|
|US9435239||Aug 1, 2013||Sep 6, 2016||Elwha Llc||Systems, methods, and apparatuses related to vehicles with reduced emissions|
|US9494064||Aug 1, 2013||Nov 15, 2016||Elwha Llc||Systems, methods, and apparatuses related to vehicles with reduced emissions|
|US20090032248 *||Aug 25, 2006||Feb 5, 2009||Michal Svoboda||Method for production, substitution, or mining of gas hydrate|
|US20100048963 *||Aug 25, 2008||Feb 25, 2010||Chevron U.S.A. Inc.||Method and system for jointly producing and processing hydrocarbons from natural gas hydrate and conventional hydrocarbon reservoirs|
|US20100145115 *||Mar 17, 2008||Jun 10, 2010||Sinvent As||Method and Device for Formation and Transportation of Gas Hydrates in Hydrocarbon Gas and/or Condensate Pipelines|
|US20100163231 *||Dec 28, 2009||Jul 1, 2010||Chevron U.S.A. Inc.||Method and system for producing hydrocarbons from a hydrate reservoir using available waste heat|
|US20100163246 *||Dec 22, 2009||Jul 1, 2010||Chevron U.S.A. Inc.||Method and system for producing hydrocarbons from a hydrate reservoir using a sweep gas|
|US20100193180 *||Aug 25, 2006||Aug 5, 2010||Yojiro Ikegawa||Method for production, substitution, or mining of gas hydrate|
|US20110123432 *||Feb 8, 2011||May 26, 2011||Marathon Oil Company||Hydrate formation for gas separation or transport|
|DE102009007453A1||Feb 4, 2009||Aug 12, 2010||Leibniz-Institut für Meereswissenschaften||Verfahren zur Erdgasförderung aus Kohlenwasserstoff-Hydraten bei gleichzeitiger Speicherung von Kohlendioxid in geologischen Formationen|
|DE102009007453B4 *||Feb 4, 2009||Feb 17, 2011||Leibniz-Institut für Meereswissenschaften||Verfahren zur Erdgasförderung aus Kohlenwasserstoff-Hydraten bei gleichzeitiger Speicherung von Kohlendioxid in geologischen Formationen|
|DE102010043720A1||Nov 10, 2010||May 10, 2012||Siemens Aktiengesellschaft||System und Verfahren zum Extrahieren eines Gases aus einem Gas-Hydrat-Vorkommen|
|WO2010088874A2||Jan 22, 2010||Aug 12, 2010||Leibniz-Institut für Meereswissenschaften||Method for producing natural gas from hydrocarbon hydrates while simultaneously storing carbon dioxide in geological formations|
|WO2012062592A1||Oct 27, 2011||May 18, 2012||Siemens Aktiengesellschaft||System and method for extraction of a gas from a gas-hydrate deposit|
|U.S. Classification||166/305.1, 166/371|
|International Classification||E21B43/25, E21B43/295|
|Cooperative Classification||Y02P90/70, E21B41/0064, C09K8/52, E21B43/25, E21B43/164, E21B2043/0115, Y02C10/14, C10L3/107, C10L3/08, C10L2290/14|
|European Classification||E21B43/16E, E21B43/25, E21B41/00M2C, C09K8/52|
|Oct 20, 2005||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY, TEXAS
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:ZORNES, DAVID R.;STEVENS, JAMES D.;HOWARD, JAMES J.;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:017110/0028
Effective date: 20050919
|Aug 7, 2007||CC||Certificate of correction|
|May 9, 2008||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: THE UNIVERSITY OF BERGEN, NORWAY
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:GRAUE, ARNE;KVAMME, BJORN;REEL/FRAME:020919/0556
Effective date: 20080509
|Nov 11, 2010||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|Feb 22, 2013||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: UNIVERSITY OF BERGEN, NORWAY
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY;REEL/FRAME:029856/0599
Effective date: 20130213
|Jan 9, 2015||REMI||Maintenance fee reminder mailed|
|May 29, 2015||LAPS||Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees|
|Jul 21, 2015||FP||Expired due to failure to pay maintenance fee|
Effective date: 20150529