|Publication number||US7222757 B2|
|Application number||US 10/924,486|
|Publication date||May 29, 2007|
|Filing date||Aug 24, 2004|
|Priority date||Aug 24, 2004|
|Also published as||US7621166, US20060043122, US20070175259|
|Publication number||10924486, 924486, US 7222757 B2, US 7222757B2, US-B2-7222757, US7222757 B2, US7222757B2|
|Inventors||Mark A. Ferreira, Yurij F. Wowczuk, Richard A. Henry, Richard H. Raborn|
|Original Assignee||Illinois Tool Works Inc.|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (31), Referenced by (13), Classifications (8), Legal Events (4)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
This invention relates to pressure release devices for internally pressurized fluid containers and aerosol cans having such pressure relief devices.
Pressurized fluid containers are in widespread use for packaging and dispensing a variety of fluid products, including liquids, gases, solids and combinations thereof. Under normal operating conditions, such containers perform entirely satisfactorily. However, in the event that the contents of such containers become over-pressurized, either because of improper use, exposure to heat or for any other reason, then a violent rupture may occur. The art has provided a variety of pressure relief devices for aerosol cans to prevent explosion of the pressurized can. Many of these pressure relief devices are in the bottom of the can, while some are in the sidewall or top. The pressure relief devices that have been proposed for the bottom have one or more of three basic structures that function to relieve pressure. The first type has a valve or stopper which opens or pops when a selected pressure level is reached within the can. A second type of pressure relief device has a scored line or lines in the bottom creating one or more regions in which the thickness of the can bottom is reduced. When the pressure in the can reaches a certain level the bottom ruptures along this region. A third category of pressure relief devices provides one or more concave regions on the can bottom. This region everts when the pressure in the can reaches a selected level thereby increasing the volume of the can and reducing the pressure. Examples of some of these previously developed pressure release devices are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 2,795,350 (Lapin); U.S. Pat. No. 3,292,826 (Abplanalp); U.S. Pat. No. 3,512,685 (Ewald); U.S. Pat. No. 3,622,051 (Benson); U.S. Pat. No. 3,724,727 (Zundel); U.S. Pat. No. 3,786,967 (Giocomo); U.S. Pat. No. 3,815,534 (Kneusel); U.S. Pat. No. 3,826,412 (Kneusel); U.S. Pat. No. 3,831,822 (Zundel); U.S. Pat. No. 4,003,505 (Hardt); U.S. Pat. No. 4,347,942 (Jernberg et al.); U.S. Pat. No. 4,416,388 (Mulawski); and U.S. Pat. No. 4,433,791 (Mulawski). In these prior art devices, scored or coined lines of reduced material thickness are caused to fracture in response to an over-pressurization of the container contents, thereby creating vent openings. Some pressurized cans have bottoms which have both scored regions and concave regions. Other types of pressure relief devices are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 2,951,614 (Greene); U.S. Pat. No. 3,356,257 (Eimer); U.S. Pat. No. 3,515,308 (Hayes); U.S. Pat. No. 3,759,414 (Beard) and U.S. Pat. No. 4,158,422 (Witten et al.).
One problem with cans having score lines in the bottom is that such devices have been difficult and expensive to manufacture in the large quantities needed to fill existing commercial demands. The problem stems from the need to consistently maintain a prescribed coin depth along the line or lines surrounding either a pressure release tab or a rim of the container. This is particularly true of the device disclosed in Mulawski U.S. Pat. No. 4,433,791. When manufacturing the device from sheet steel having a thickness of 0.015″, the coined depth must be maintained within an extremely narrow range of between about 0.0015″ and 0.0025″ in order to insure that pressure is released within a range of between about 210 to 250 psi. A shallower coin depth will result in an unacceptably high pressure release, thereby presenting a risk that the container will fail in an unpredictable manner. On the other hand, a deeper coin depth may produce a prematurely low pressure release, and prompt the development of micro cracks in the remaining relatively thin membrane at the base of the coined line. These micro cracks may not always be detectable at the time of manufacture. They may occur later after the container has been filled with a pressurized product, thereby resulting in leakage and potentially costly losses. Thus, the manufacturing process must be carefully monitored with particular attention to timely equipment adjustments to compensate for tool wear, and, when appropriate, to replace worn tools. This requires frequent product sampling and testing, all of which significantly increases manufacturing costs.
Another problem that is encountered in the manufacture of pressure relief devices results from the fact that the sheet metal from which the device is formed frequently varies in thickness by a few thousandths of an inch. If the region being coined is thinner than specified, then the web at the coined region likely will be thinner than expected. A difference of only a few thousandths can result in premature rupture of the coined region.
Because of the many manufacturing problems that are encountered in making pressure relief devices having coined regions, those skilled in the art have attempted to develop pressure relief devices that do not have any coined regions. Indeed, Mulawski in U.S. Pat. No. 4,580,690 teaches away from the use of coined regions in a pressure relief device, advocating a highly effective pressure release device which is entirely free of scored or coined lines. Such a device is said to thereby obviate many of the above-described production problems associated with the prior art devices having coined regions.
Consequently, there is a need for a pressure relief device having a coined section that can be mass produced in a manner that will overcome the problems associated with the manufacture of the coined pressure relief devices of the prior art. This device should hold pressures of at least 200 psi before venting and preferably hold pressures of at least 300 psi before venting.
We provide a pressure relief device for venting an internally pressurized container and an aerosol can having a can bottom containing this pressure relief device. The pressure relief device has three sections, a concave annular outer area, a circular central area and an annular intermediate area connecting the concave annular area to the circular area. The three sections are formed from a continuous sheet. The central area has a center point and an arc shaped score line extending through 132° to 138°, preferably about 135°, about an arc center. The arc center is offset from the center point of the circular area by a distance of from 0.290 plus or minus 0.002 inches. The score line has a depth of from 0.010 to 0.012 inches and is trapezoidal in cross section with a taper of about 30°. The width at the base is about 0.34 inches. The intermediate area meets the circular area at an angle greater than 90° and the intermediate area meets the concave annular outer area at an angle greater than 90°.
We further provide a compound die for making the pressure relief device. While a compound die is the preferred tooling apparatus, other devices, such as progressive dies, would also be suitable. The die has a male portion having a concave annular outer area region, a circular central area having a recess, and an annular intermediate area connecting the concave annular area to the circular area such that the intermediate area meets the circular area at an angle greater than 90° and the intermediate area meets the concave annular outer area at an angle greater than 90°. An insert is removably inserted into the recess in the male portion. That insert has a circular top surface having a center point and an arc shaped projection extending through 132° to 138° about an arc center. The arc center is offset from the center point of the circular area by a distance of from 0.290 plus or minus 0.002 inches. The projection has a height of from 0.022 to 0.024 inches and a width of 0.034 inches at the maximum.
Other objects and advantages of our pressure relief device, aerosol can and die will become apparent from a description of certain present preferred embodiments thereof which are shown in the drawings.
A container 10 of the type conventionally employed to package and dispense pressurized fluid products is shown in
A present preferred embodiment of the pressure relief device 16 shown in
We tested several sample cans having the pressure relief device shown in
From Table 1 we can see that cans having the pressure relief device of the present invention will vent at pressures from 341 psi to 360 psi, a range of only 19. The ranges for all other types of cans at which venting occurs is much wider. Moreover, this narrow range occurred when the coin depth varied from 0.0048″ to 0.0054″, a difference of only 0.0006″. In contrast, cans having the pressure relief bottom disclosed in the '874 patent vented over a wider range of pressures, 409 psi to 471 psi even though coining depths were within a narrower range. This data demonstrates that a can made in accordance with the present invention is much more reliable than aerosol cans having pressure relief devices of the prior art. We attribute the improved performance of the DROC cans made in accordance with the present invention to the combination of the thickness and curvature of the pressure relief device coupled with the position of the score line. While one might expect better performance when the score line is centered about the center of the circular area, our tests showed that just the opposite was true. Better performance is obtained when the score line is offset by about 0.290 inches from the center point of the circular central area.
To further test the integrity of the present design we evaluated a can made in accordance with the present invention but without the coined section. This test simulates a condition in which the coined section fails to operate to vent and the situation in which the coined section is not applied because of a defect in the die or improper operation of the press. Table 2 presents the results of that test. As the data indicates, the can without the coined section first reversed its curvature and then fractured allowing the can to vent. The table records the pressure at which fracture and venting occurred. For purposes of comparison Table 2 also includes the performance of cans having a bottom as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,580,690, which data also appears in Table 1.
TABLE 2 DROC Plain DROC ‘690’ VENT REV/VENT REV/VENT Sample (psi) (psi) (psi) 1 348 482/468 388/426 2 353 503/466 380/435 3 351 507/458 393/436 4 351 468/471 401/412 5 342 495/460 425/449 6 350 493/462 419/434 7 355 481/462 456/458 8 360 488/455 413/425 9 345 458/455 416/425 10 359 462/462 409/436 11 349 456/456 432/453 12 341 493/453 446/454 Average 350 478/461 415/437
The data in Table 2 shows that a can made in accordance with the present invention has a significant margin of integrity should the can not vent. Moreover, the can is able to withstand pressures significantly higher than the pressures that a can of the '690 patent can withstand. We attribute this performance to the thickness and curvature of the pressure release device.
The data in Table 1 shows that the coin depth varied by only 0.0006 inches among the DROC cans tested and that the variation had little effect upon performance. We are able to achieve such a small variance through the use of the die set shown in
Although we have shown and described certain present preferred embodiments of our pressure relief device, aerosol can and die, it should be distinctly understood that our invention is not limited thereto, but may be variously embodied within the scope of the following claims.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US2795350||Dec 2, 1953||Jun 11, 1957||Dev Res Inc||Explosion-proof low-pressure containers|
|US2951614||Mar 30, 1959||Sep 6, 1960||Theodore Greene||Pressure containers and improvements in safety constructions therefor|
|US3219488 *||Dec 15, 1961||Nov 23, 1965||Union Carbide Corp||Reinforced combination safety blow-out and gas permeable membrane for alkaline galvanic cells|
|US3484817||Nov 7, 1967||Dec 16, 1969||Black Swalls & Bryson Inc||Safety pressure relief device|
|US3680743||Apr 10, 1970||Aug 1, 1972||Cornell Aeronautical Labor Inc||Safety venting apparatus combined with an aerosol container|
|US3724727||Jun 12, 1972||Apr 3, 1973||Nat Can Corp||Aerosol safety can|
|US3759414||Mar 1, 1971||Sep 18, 1973||Beard W||Self-venting vessel|
|US3786967||Jun 8, 1972||Jan 22, 1974||American Can Co||Pressure relief system for an aerosol container|
|US3826412||Jul 26, 1972||Jul 30, 1974||Crown Cork & Seal Co||Pressure release valves for aerosol cans|
|US3831822 *||Mar 22, 1973||Aug 27, 1974||Nat Can Corp||Safety aerosol can|
|US3938693||Feb 10, 1975||Feb 17, 1976||Continental Can Company, Inc.||Non-detachable easy open flap and tab assembly|
|US3979009||Oct 17, 1975||Sep 7, 1976||Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation||Container bottom structure|
|US3998174||Aug 7, 1975||Dec 21, 1976||National Steel Corporation||Light-weight, high-strength, drawn and ironed, flat rolled steel container body method of manufacture|
|US4003505||Dec 23, 1975||Jan 18, 1977||Aluminium Suisse S.A.||Relief vent for pressurized cans|
|US4347942||Nov 24, 1980||Sep 7, 1982||Pressure-Pak Container Co., Inc.||Pressure relief device and method of fabrication thereof|
|US4416388||Sep 20, 1982||Nov 22, 1983||Sexton Can Company, Inc.||Pressure relief device|
|US4433791||Dec 3, 1981||Feb 28, 1984||Sexton Can Company, Inc.||Pressure relief device for internally pressurized fluid container|
|US4436218||Jan 26, 1982||Mar 13, 1984||Imi Marston Limited||Reverse buckling bursting disc|
|US4513874||Jan 25, 1984||Apr 30, 1985||Sexton Can Company, Inc.||Pressure relief device for internally pressurized fluid container|
|US4576303 *||Feb 21, 1985||Mar 18, 1986||Bs&B Safety Systems, Inc.||Rupturable pressure relieving fluid containers|
|US4580690||Apr 11, 1985||Apr 8, 1986||Sexton Can Company, Inc.||Coinless pressure relief device|
|US4588101 *||Oct 10, 1984||May 13, 1986||Southern Can Company||Safety vent for containers|
|US4610370 *||Dec 30, 1985||Sep 9, 1986||Amoco Corporation||Pressure release vent|
|US4738372 *||Nov 21, 1985||Apr 19, 1988||Pressure Pak, Inc.||Method and device for corrosion relief of a pressure vessel|
|US4842965 *||Sep 25, 1987||Jun 27, 1989||Hitachi Maxell, Ltd.||Non aqueous electrochemical battery with explosion proof arrangement and a method of the production thereof|
|US4987520 *||Jul 14, 1989||Jan 22, 1991||U.S. Philips Corp.||Electronic component, electrolytic capacitor and metal housing|
|US5397023 *||Dec 6, 1993||Mar 14, 1995||James River Corporation Of Virginia||Disposable cup lid having a tear-resistant straw through-slit|
|US5570803 *||Apr 14, 1994||Nov 5, 1996||Bs&B Safety Systems, Inc.||Rupturable pressure relieving apparatus and methods of manufacturing the same|
|US5845811 *||Jul 25, 1996||Dec 8, 1998||The Boc Group Plc||Gas capsule|
|US6786507 *||Sep 5, 2002||Sep 7, 2004||Trw Airbag Systems Gmbh & Co. Kg||Hybrid gas generator|
|US20050155991 *||Jan 20, 2004||Jul 21, 2005||Jackman Brian F.||Pressure activated self opening container and seal|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US7971759 *||Aug 20, 2008||Jul 5, 2011||Ds Containers, Inc.||Aerosol container with pressure relief mechanism|
|US8967411||Jun 3, 2011||Mar 3, 2015||Illinois Tool Works Inc.||Pressure relief device for pressurized container|
|US20080173644 *||Jan 22, 2007||Jul 24, 2008||Tecumseh Products Company||Pressure limiter|
|US20100044399 *||Aug 20, 2008||Feb 25, 2010||Ds Containers||Aerosol container with pressure releif mechanism|
|US20130112648 *||Nov 6, 2012||May 9, 2013||Sodastream Industries Ltd.||Machine independent metal safety bottle|
|US20150151900 *||Jun 23, 2013||Jun 4, 2015||Illinois Tool Works Inc.||Pressure relief device for pressurized container|
|USD742251||Jul 16, 2014||Nov 3, 2015||Ball Corporation||Two-piece contoured metallic container|
|USD758207||Aug 8, 2014||Jun 7, 2016||Ball Corporation||Two-piece contoured metallic container|
|CN102939251A *||Jun 3, 2011||Feb 20, 2013||伊利诺斯工具制品有限公司||Pressure relief device for pressurized container|
|CN102939251B *||Jun 3, 2011||Dec 10, 2014||伊利诺斯工具制品有限公司||Pressure relief device for pressurized container|
|EP2157027A1||Aug 19, 2009||Feb 24, 2010||DS Containers, Inc.||Aerosol container with pressure relief mechanism|
|WO2011153405A2||Jun 3, 2011||Dec 8, 2011||Illinois Tool Works Inc.||Pressure relief device for pressurized container|
|WO2014008014A1||Jun 23, 2013||Jan 9, 2014||Illinois Tool Works Inc.||Pressure relief device for pressurized container|
|U.S. Classification||222/397, 137/68.27, 220/89.2|
|Cooperative Classification||B65D83/70, Y10T137/1744, Y10S72/715|
|Sep 14, 2004||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: SEXTON CAN COMPANY, MASSACHUSETTS
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:FERREIRA, MARK A.;WOWCZUK, YURIJ F.;HENRY, RICHARD A.;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:015124/0700;SIGNING DATES FROM 20040804 TO 20040820
|Oct 6, 2004||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: ILLINOIS TOOL WORKS INC., ILLINOIS
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:SEXTON CAN COMPANY;REEL/FRAME:015221/0939
Effective date: 20040903
|Nov 29, 2010||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|Dec 1, 2014||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 8