|Publication number||US7239998 B2|
|Application number||US 11/247,074|
|Publication date||Jul 3, 2007|
|Filing date||Oct 11, 2005|
|Priority date||Jan 10, 2001|
|Also published as||US6990439, US20020123877, US20060031061|
|Publication number||11247074, 247074, US 7239998 B2, US 7239998B2, US-B2-7239998, US7239998 B2, US7239998B2|
|Original Assignee||Microsoft Corporation|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (9), Non-Patent Citations (7), Referenced by (31), Classifications (6), Legal Events (3)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
The present application is a continuing of and claims priority of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/757,836, filed Jan. 10, 2001, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,990,439 the content of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
The present invention relates to machine translation of languages. More specifically, the present invention relates to phrase translation of languages using a unified language and translation model.
Machine translation involves a computer receiving input text either in written form, or in the form of speech, or in another suitable machine-readable form. The machine may typically use a statistical translation model in order to translate the words in the input text from a first language (in which they are input) to a second, desired language. The translation is then output by the machine translator.
Previous methods of machine translation can roughly be classified into two categories. The first category includes rule-based translators. These translators receive input text and apply rules to the input text in order to arrive at a translation from a first language to a second language. However, such rule-based systems suffer from a number of disadvantages. For example, such systems are relatively slow, and exhibit low robustness.
The second category of prior machine translation systems includes statistically based systems. Such systems use statistical models in an attempt to translate the words in the input from a first language to a second language. However, statistical models also suffer from certain disadvantages. For example, such models often suffer because they largely ignore structural information in performing the translation. This has resulted in poor translation quality.
The present invention is a method and apparatus for processing a phrase in a first language for translation to a second language. A plurality of possible linguistic patterns are identified in the second language, that correspond to the phrase in the first language. For each of the patterns identified, a probability for the pattern is calculated, based on a combination of the language model probability for the pattern and a translation model probability for the pattern. In one embodiment, an output is also provided which is indicative of a translation of the phrase in the first language to the second language based upon the translation probabilities calculated for the patterns.
In one embodiment, a highest translation probability is identified and a linguistic pattern, for which the highest translation probability was calculated, is identified as being indicative of a likely phrase translation of the phrase in the first language.
The present invention can also be implemented as an apparatus which includes a pattern engine that receives a phrase in the first language and identifies a plurality of linguistic patterns in the second language which possibly correspond to a translation of the phrase from the first language to the second language. The apparatus also includes a probability generator configured to generate, for each linguistic pattern identified, a translation probability for translating the phrase in the first language to the second language in the linguistic pattern.
The apparatus may further include a bi-lingual data store storing phrases in the first language and corresponding linguistic patterns in the second language. In addition, the probability generator illustratively includes a translation model, such that the probability generator is configured to generate the translation probability by accessing the translation model. The probability generator illustratively further includes a language model in the second language, such that the probability generator is configured to generate the translation probability by accessing the language model as well.
The invention is operational with numerous other general purpose or special purpose computing system environments or configurations. Examples of well known computing systems, environments, and/or configurations that may be suitable for use with the invention include, but are not limited to, personal computers, server computers, hand-held or laptop devices, multiprocessor systems, microprocessor-based systems, set top boxes, programmable consumer electronics, network PCs, minicomputers, mainframe computers, distributed computing environments that include any of the above systems or devices, and the like.
The invention may be described in the general context of computer-executable instructions, such as program modules, being executed by a computer. Generally, program modules include routines, programs, objects, components, data structures, etc. that perform particular tasks or implement particular abstract data types. The invention may also be practiced in distributed computing environments where tasks are performed by remote processing devices that are linked through a communications network. In a distributed computing environment, program modules may be located in both local and remote computer storage media including memory storage devices.
With reference to
Computer 110 typically includes a variety of computer readable media. Computer readable media can be any available media that can be accessed by computer 110 and includes both volatile and nonvolatile media, removable and non-removable media. By way of example, and not limitation, computer readable media may comprise computer storage media and communication media. Computer storage media includes both volatile and nonvolatile, removable and non-removable media implemented in any method or technology for storage of information such as computer readable instructions, data structures, program modules or other data. Computer storage media includes, but is not limited to, RAM, ROM, EEPROM, flash memory or other memory technology, CD-ROM, digital versatile disks (DVD) or other optical disk storage, magnetic cassettes, magnetic tape, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other medium which can be used to store the desired information and which can be accessed by computer 100. Communication media typically embodies computer readable instructions, data structures, program modules or other data in a modulated data signal such as a carrier WAV or other transport mechanism and includes any information delivery media. The term “modulated data signal” means a signal that has one or more of its characteristics set or changed in such a manner as to encode information in the signal. By way of example, and not limitation, communication media includes wired media such as a wired network or direct-wired connection, and wireless media such as acoustic, FR, infrared and other wireless media. Combinations of any of the above should also be included within the scope of computer readable media.
The system memory 130 includes computer storage media in the form of volatile and/or nonvolatile memory such as read only memory (ROM) 131 and random access memory (RAM) 132. A basic input/output system 133 (BIOS), containing the basic routines that help to transfer information between elements within computer 110, such as during start-up, is typically stored in ROM 131. RAM 132 typically contains data and/or program modules that are immediately accessible to and/or presently being operated on by processing unit 120. By way o example, and not limitation,
The computer 110 may also include other removable/non-removable volatile/nonvolatile computer storage media. By way of example only,
The drives and their associated computer storage media discussed above and illustrated in
A user may enter commands and information into the computer 110 through input devices such as a keyboard 162, a microphone 163, and a pointing device 161, such as a mouse, trackball or touch pad. Other input devices (not shown) may include a joystick, game pad, satellite dish, scanner, or the like. These and other input devices are often connected to the processing unit 120 through a user input interface 160 that is coupled to the system bus, but may be connected by other interface and bus structures, such as a parallel port, game port or a universal serial bus (USB). A monitor 191 or other type of display device is also connected to the system bus 121 via an interface, such as a video interface 190. In addition to the monitor, computers may also include other peripheral output devices such as speakers 197 and printer 196, which may be connected through an output peripheral interface 190.
The computer 110 may operate in a networked environment using logical connections to one or more remote computers, such as a remote computer 180. The remote computer 180 may be a personal computer, a hand-held device, a server, a router, a network PC, a peer device or other common network node, and typically includes many or all of the elements described above relative to the computer 110. The logical connections depicted in
When used in a LAN networking environment, the computer 110 is connected to the LAN 171 through a network interface or adapter 170. When used in a WAN networking environment, the computer 110 typically includes a modem 172 or other means for establishing communications over the WAN 173, such as the Internet. The modem 172, which may be internal or external, may be connected to the system bus 121 via the user input interface 160, or other appropriate mechanism. In a networked environment, program modules depicted relative to the computer 110, or portions thereof, may be stored in the remote memory storage device. By way of example, and not limitation,
While the translation system of the present invention can be described with respect to translating between substantially any two languages, the present invention will be described herein, for exemplary purposes only, as translating from an English input phrase to a Chinese output phrase. Therefore, phrase 202 is illustratively a phrase in the English language and output 204 is illustratively some indication as to the translation of phrase 202 into Chinese.
In one illustrative embodiment, bi-lingual pattern data store 210 is illustratively trained by accessing bi-lingual corpus 206. In other words, different linguistic patterns in Chinese can be identified for any given phrase in English.
More specifically, bi-lingual corpus 206 illustratively includes both a large Chinese language corpus and a large English language corpus. Bi-lingual pattern data store 210 is trained based on bi-lingual corpus 206 and includes a plurality of Chinese linguistic patterns which can correspond to a given English phrase.
Second language corpus 208 is illustratively a large Chinese text corpus. Of course, second language corpus 208 can be the Chinese portion of bi-lingual corpus 206, or a separate corpus. Language model 220 is illustratively trained based upon the second language corpus 208. Language model 220 is illustratively a conventional language model (such as a tri-gram language model) which provides the probability of any given Chinese word, given its history. Specifically, in the tri-gram embodiment, language model 220 provides the probability of a Chinese word given the two previous words in the phrase under analysis.
Pattern probability model 218 is a model which generates the probability of any given linguistic pattern in the second language (for the sake of this example, in the Chinese language). Translation model 216 can be any suitable translation model which provides a probability of translation of a word in the first language (e.g. English) to a word in the second language (e.g. Chinese). In the illustrative embodiment, translation model 216 is the well-known translation model developed by International Business Machines, of Armonk, N.Y., and is discussed in greater detail below.
Translator component 214 receives the probabilities generated by probability generator 212 and provides an indication as to a translation of the English phrase 202 into a Chinese phrase 204. Of course, translator component 214 can be part of probability generator 212, or can be a separately operable component.
Pattern probability model 218 then obtains a plurality of possible linguistic patterns 232 associated with the input phrase from bi-lingual pattern data store 210. This is indicated by block 234 in
Therefore, bi-lingual pattern data store 210 illustratively includes a plurality of English phrases (such as phrase E) followed by a corresponding plurality of linguistic patterns in the second language (such as the linguistic pattern set out in
Probability generator 212 then selects one of the linguistic patterns 232 as indicated by block 236 in
Probability generator 212 then determines whether there are any additional patterns for the English phrase E for which a translation probability must be generated. This is indicated by block 240. If additional linguistic patterns exist, processing continues at block 236. However, if no additional linguistic patterns exist, for which a translation probability has not been calculated, probability generator 212 provides the combined probabilities for each of the plurality of patterns at its output to translator component 214. This is indicated by block 242 in
It will be noted, of course, that the output from probability generator 212 can be done as each probability is generated. In addition, probability generator 212 can optionally only provide at its output the linguistic pattern associated with the highest translation probability. However, probability generator 212 can also provide the top N-best linguistic patterns, based on the translation probability, or it can provide all linguistic patterns identified, and their associated translation probabilities, ranked in the order of the highest translation probability first, or in any other desired order.
Once translator component 214 receives the linguistic patterns and the associated translation probabilities, it provides, at its output, an indication of the translation of the English phrase E into the second language (in this case, the Chinese language). This is indicated by block 244 in
For the following discussion, let “e” represent an English phrase containing “n” words, and let “wi” represent the “ith” word in the phrase. Let “c” represent the Chinese translation of the English phrase “e”, and let “patterns” represent the related linguistic phrase translation patterns which correspond to the English phrase “e”. The present statistical model is based on the overall probability of the Chinese phrase “c”, given the English phrase “e” as follows:
Also, assume that:
P(patern|c,e)=1 Eq. 2
then, from Bayes law:
and further assume that
P(e|pattern)=1. Eq. 4
P(pattern|e) be referred to as the pattern probability, or the probability of generating a given Chinese linguistic pattern, given the English input text, and let
P(c|pattern) be called the Chinese Statistical Language Model, in other words, the probability of the Chinese translation “c” given the linguistic “pattern”; and let
P(e|c, pattern) be called the Translation Model, which represents the probability of generating the phrase “e” given the Chinese translation “c” and the pattern “pattern”.
Further, we make the following two assumptions. First, a two-order hidden Markov Model is used and second, an assumption of independence is made between the hidden Markov Models and the probability set out in P(pattern|e).
Then, simplifying the above equations, the following probability of generating the Chinese translation “c” given the English language phrase “e” is given by:
Therefore, the problem of performing the machine translation is transferred into a search problem, as follows:
where “m” is the number of linguistic patterns used in the phrase translation, “h” is the context, there are “n” characters in the proposed Chinese translation, and “ew” represents a given word in the English phrase.
It can thus be seen that Equation 9 indicates that, for each linguistic pattern identified as being a possible linguistic pattern corresponding to a translation of the input English text, both the language model probability and the translation model probability are applied. This provides a unified probability that not only includes statistical information, but structural and linguistic information as well. This leads to structural information being reflected in the statistic translation model and leads to an improvement in the quality of the machine translation system.
Although the present invention has been described with reference to particular embodiments, workers skilled in the art will recognize that changes may be made in form and detail without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US5477451||Jul 25, 1991||Dec 19, 1995||International Business Machines Corp.||Method and system for natural language translation|
|US5510981||Oct 28, 1993||Apr 23, 1996||International Business Machines Corporation||Language translation apparatus and method using context-based translation models|
|US5963892||Jun 26, 1996||Oct 5, 1999||Sony Corporation||Translation apparatus and method for facilitating speech input operation and obtaining correct translation thereof|
|US6161082||Nov 18, 1997||Dec 12, 2000||At&T Corp||Network based language translation system|
|US6161083||Apr 24, 1997||Dec 12, 2000||Sony Corporation||Example-based translation method and system which calculates word similarity degrees, a priori probability, and transformation probability to determine the best example for translation|
|US6304841 *||Jul 29, 1997||Oct 16, 2001||International Business Machines Corporation||Automatic construction of conditional exponential models from elementary features|
|US20020040292 *||May 11, 2001||Apr 4, 2002||Daniel Marcu||Machine translation techniques|
|US20020065647||Jul 19, 2001||May 30, 2002||International Business Machines Corporation||Method and apparatus for machine translation and recording medium|
|US20020111789||Dec 18, 2000||Aug 15, 2002||Xerox Corporation||Method and apparatus for terminology translation|
|1||An Intelligent Full-Text Chinese-English Translation System, Tou, J.T. Information Sciences vol. 125, no. 1-4, pp. 1-18.|
|2||Bitext Maps and Alignment via Pattern Recognition, Computational Linguistics, Mar. 1999, vol. 25, No. 1. pp. 107-130.|
|3||Building a Thai Part-of-Speech Tagged Corpus (ORCHID), Sornlerlamvanich, V. et al., Journal of the Acoustical Society of Japan (E) vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 189-198.|
|4||EUROTRA Project Voor Automatische Vertaling van de EG. Informatie vol. 31, No. 11, pp. 821-826.|
|5||Sentence-Based Machine Translation for English-Thai, Chancharoen, K. et al. 1998 IEEE Asia-Pacific Conference on Circuits and Systems. p. 141-144.|
|6||Some Specific Features of Software and Technology in the AMPAR and NERPA Systems of Machine Translation. International Forum on Information and Documentation, 1984, vol. 9, No. 2. pp. 9-11.|
|7||The Machine Translation Project Rosetta. De Jong, F. Informatie vol. 32, No. 2 pp. 170-180. 1990 Netherlands.|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US8056136||Mar 29, 2011||Nov 8, 2011||Kaspersky Lab Zao||System and method for detection of malware and management of malware-related information|
|US8060360||Oct 30, 2007||Nov 15, 2011||Microsoft Corporation||Word-dependent transition models in HMM based word alignment for statistical machine translation|
|US8214196||Jul 3, 2002||Jul 3, 2012||University Of Southern California||Syntax-based statistical translation model|
|US8234106||Oct 8, 2009||Jul 31, 2012||University Of Southern California||Building a translation lexicon from comparable, non-parallel corpora|
|US8296127||Mar 22, 2005||Oct 23, 2012||University Of Southern California||Discovery of parallel text portions in comparable collections of corpora and training using comparable texts|
|US8380486||Oct 1, 2009||Feb 19, 2013||Language Weaver, Inc.||Providing machine-generated translations and corresponding trust levels|
|US8433556||Nov 2, 2006||Apr 30, 2013||University Of Southern California||Semi-supervised training for statistical word alignment|
|US8468149||Jan 26, 2007||Jun 18, 2013||Language Weaver, Inc.||Multi-lingual online community|
|US8548794||Jul 2, 2004||Oct 1, 2013||University Of Southern California||Statistical noun phrase translation|
|US8600728||Oct 12, 2005||Dec 3, 2013||University Of Southern California||Training for a text-to-text application which uses string to tree conversion for training and decoding|
|US8615389||Mar 14, 2008||Dec 24, 2013||Language Weaver, Inc.||Generation and exploitation of an approximate language model|
|US8655644||Sep 30, 2009||Feb 18, 2014||International Business Machines Corporation||Language translation in an environment associated with a virtual application|
|US8666725 *||Apr 15, 2005||Mar 4, 2014||University Of Southern California||Selection and use of nonstatistical translation components in a statistical machine translation framework|
|US8676563||Jun 21, 2010||Mar 18, 2014||Language Weaver, Inc.||Providing human-generated and machine-generated trusted translations|
|US8694303||Jun 15, 2011||Apr 8, 2014||Language Weaver, Inc.||Systems and methods for tuning parameters in statistical machine translation|
|US8825466||Jun 8, 2007||Sep 2, 2014||Language Weaver, Inc.||Modification of annotated bilingual segment pairs in syntax-based machine translation|
|US8831928||Apr 4, 2007||Sep 9, 2014||Language Weaver, Inc.||Customizable machine translation service|
|US8886515||Oct 19, 2011||Nov 11, 2014||Language Weaver, Inc.||Systems and methods for enhancing machine translation post edit review processes|
|US8886517||Jun 29, 2012||Nov 11, 2014||Language Weaver, Inc.||Trust scoring for language translation systems|
|US8886518||Aug 7, 2006||Nov 11, 2014||Language Weaver, Inc.||System and method for capitalizing machine translated text|
|US8942973||Mar 9, 2012||Jan 27, 2015||Language Weaver, Inc.||Content page URL translation|
|US8943080||Dec 5, 2006||Jan 27, 2015||University Of Southern California||Systems and methods for identifying parallel documents and sentence fragments in multilingual document collections|
|US8977536||Jun 3, 2008||Mar 10, 2015||University Of Southern California||Method and system for translating information with a higher probability of a correct translation|
|US8990064||Jul 28, 2009||Mar 24, 2015||Language Weaver, Inc.||Translating documents based on content|
|US9122674||Dec 15, 2006||Sep 1, 2015||Language Weaver, Inc.||Use of annotations in statistical machine translation|
|US9152622||Nov 26, 2012||Oct 6, 2015||Language Weaver, Inc.||Personalized machine translation via online adaptation|
|US9213694||Oct 10, 2013||Dec 15, 2015||Language Weaver, Inc.||Efficient online domain adaptation|
|US9542389||Oct 25, 2013||Jan 10, 2017||International Business Machines Corporation||Language translation in an environment associated with a virtual application|
|US20060015320 *||Apr 15, 2005||Jan 19, 2006||Och Franz J||Selection and use of nonstatistical translation components in a statistical machine translation framework|
|US20090112573 *||Oct 30, 2007||Apr 30, 2009||Microsoft Corporation||Word-dependent transition models in HMM based word alignment for statistical machine translation|
|US20100228538 *||Mar 3, 2009||Sep 9, 2010||Yamada John A||Computational linguistic systems and methods|
|U.S. Classification||704/9, 704/2|
|International Classification||G10L15/00, G06F17/28|
|Dec 3, 2010||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|Dec 9, 2014||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING, LLC, WASHINGTON
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:MICROSOFT CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:034543/0001
Effective date: 20141014
|Dec 29, 2014||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 8