Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS7242921 B2
Publication typeGrant
Application numberUS 09/751,322
Publication dateJul 10, 2007
Filing dateDec 29, 2000
Priority dateDec 29, 2000
Fee statusPaid
Also published asCN1636213A, CN100437602C, CN101369334A, EP1352352A2, EP2325770A1, US8417216, US20020086660, US20070184830, US20140136374, WO2002054321A2, WO2002054321A8
Publication number09751322, 751322, US 7242921 B2, US 7242921B2, US-B2-7242921, US7242921 B2, US7242921B2
InventorsRob Sullivan, David W. Aucsmith
Original AssigneeIntel Corporation
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Anonymous electronic transactions
US 7242921 B2
Abstract
Techniques are disclosed for protecting privacy of parties to electronic transactions, such as transactions conducted through a GSM network. An anonymity service provider receives orders directed from its subscriber to a recipient for goods or services, along with information about its subscriber. The anonymity service provider relays the order to the recipient but withholds information about the subscriber, as the subscriber directs. The recipient receives payment for the good or service by way of a voucher from the anonymity service provider.
Images(7)
Previous page
Next page
Claims(5)
1. A system comprising:
a communication network;
a first party interface coupled to the network;
a second party interface coupled to the network; and
an anonymizer, comprising a processor, a database and a communication interface, the anonymizer coupled to the network by the communication interface,
wherein the anonymizer receives information about a first party, the anonymizer receives an electronic order placed on the network through the first party interface, the anonymizer is configured to transmit the order to the second party interface, and the anonymizer is configured to transmit less information about the first party to the second party interface than was received.
2. The system of claim 1 wherein the communication network includes a GSM network.
3. The system of claim 2 wherein the first party interface includes a subscriber identity module, and wherein information about the first party received by the anonymizer is supplied by the subscriber identity module.
4. The system of claim 1 wherein the communication network includes an integrated services digital network.
5. The system of claim 1 wherein the communication network includes a public switched telephone network.
Description
BACKGROUND

GSM originally stood for Groupe Special Mobile, a European study group formed in 1982 to study and develop criteria for a pan-European mobile telephone system. GSM is currently recognized as an acronym for Global System for Mobile communications, and represents the criteria developed as a result of the work of the Groupe Special Mobile. In general, GSM represents a set of mobile telephone standards and specifications. Equipment that meets GSM standards in one GSM network is compatible with any GSM network. GSM networks now exist worldwide.

DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a diagram of a communications network.

FIG. 2 is a diagram of a communications network including an anonymizer.

FIG. 3 is a conceptual diagram depicting the flow of data, and goods or services in an electronic transaction involving an anonymizer.

FIG. 4 is a diagram of an anonymizer.

FIG. 5 is a flowchart illustrating techniques for providing anonymizer service.

FIG. 6 is a flowchart illustrating variable anonymity.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The techniques described below allow network subscribers to conduct electronic transactions with providers of goods and services, while maintaining a degree of personal privacy. The techniques are especially advantageous in the context of a GSM network, but are not limited to GSM.

GSM systems are digital systems that employ time division multiple access technology, allowing several subscribers to share a frequency channel at the same time. GSM systems are intended to interface with digital communication networks such as the Integrated Services Digital Network (ISDN). GSM systems are also intended to work with analog communication systems, such as the Public Switched Telephone Network (PSTN).

FIG. 1 shows a typical communications network 10 that includes GSM systems. A subscriber obtains wireless access to network 10 via mobile device 12. Mobile device 12 may be any kind of terminal that accesses network 10, such as a mobile telephone handset. Mobile device 12 typically is assigned a unique International Mobile device Identity, which identifies each piece of mobile device 12 to network 10. In addition, mobile device 12 interfaces with Subscriber Identity Module (SIM) 14, which uniquely identifies the subscriber to network 10. A typical SIM 14 is a smart card that is inserted into a GSM terminal. The subscriber can make and receive calls with mobile device 12.

Mobile device 12 accesses network 10 by establishing a wireless communication link with a base transceiver station 16. Base transceiver station 16 includes a transceiver that defines a cellular calling area. Base transceiver station 16 typically handles the wireless protocols with mobile device 12. A plurality of base station transceivers are generally managed by a base station controller 18. A plurality of base station controllers is usually coupled to a mobile services switching center 20, which typically acts as a central component in the cellular network. Base transceiver station 16, base station controller 18 and mobile services switching center 20 are typically operated under the auspices of a GSM provider 22.

Mobile services switching center 20 interfaces with other communication services, such as ISDN 24 and PSTN 30, each of which may be operated under the auspices of different communications suppliers 26, 28. ISDN 24 and PSTN 30 provide service to subscribers such as telephone customers 32. In addition, ISDN 24 and PSTN 30 may each connect to automated subscribers 34, such as computers, copying machines, toll booths or vending machines. Toll booths and vending machines, for example, may dispense services or goods when provided with a signal authorizing them to do so.

In typical network 10, a subscriber can use mobile device 12 to place an electronic order for goods or services. This transaction may be processed in several ways, such as by accessing an account or authorizing payment by credit card. One method for processing the transaction is to use subscriber data stored in SIM 14. Invoices can then be billed to the subscriber's account with GSM provider 22. Typically the entity receiving the order learns personal information from the subscriber's SIM 14 and mobile device 12, such as the subscriber's identity, location or calling pattern. In exchange for the simplicity of making an electronic transactional order for goods or services, subscribers may be giving up some of their privacy. The techniques described below allow GSM subscribers to preserve their privacy while making electronic transactional orders for goods and services.

FIG. 2 shows a communications network 50 that includes a GSM system 52. Unlike network 10 of FIG. 1, network 50 of FIG. 2 includes an element 54 to be called herein an “anonymizer,” because it provides anonymity service. In FIG. 2, anonymizer 54 provides anonymity service to GSM subscribers using network 50. Network 50 of FIG. 2 also includes a payee 56, which may be an automated subscriber like automated subscriber 34 in FIG. 1. A GSM user 58 who subscribes to the anonymity service provided by anonymizer 54 interfaces with network 50 via an interface such as mobile device 12. Payee 56 interfaces with network by way of an interface such as a connection to PSTN 30.

Anonymizer 54 is shown in FIG. 2 as interposed between PSTN 30 and payee 56, but anonymizer 54 may communicate with payee 56 by way of PSTN 30, or by way of another communication channel. Furthermore, anonymizer 54 could be placed at other locations in network 50. Anonymizer 54 could be, for example, part of GSM system 52 and operated under the auspices of GSM provider 22. Anonymizer 54 may alternatively be operated under the auspices of PSTN 30 or any other communication provider. The service of anonymizer 54 may also be offered by an anonymity service provider independent of the communication network. Furthermore, anonymizer 54 is not limited to application with an analog system such as PSTN 30, but may provide anonymity in a digital system such as ISDN 24 (not shown in FIG. 2).

Subscriber 58 to the anonymity service provided by anonymizer 54 may conduct transactions by providing no personal data or by providing a selected amount of personal data. Anonymizer 54 protects the privacy of subscriber 58 by providing no personal information, or limited personal information, to payee 56.

FIG. 3 illustrates an exemplary transaction using anonymizer 54. Subscriber 58 places an electronic transactional order for a good or service from payee 56, using mobile device 12. Subscriber 58 sends information that will be needed to process the order, such as the kind of service desired or the quantity of product needed. In addition, other information about subscriber 58 may be transmitted automatically, such as the name of the subscriber, the location of the call and the equipment used to make the order. This information is passed to GSM system 52, and may be relayed via PSTN 30 to anonymizer 54.

Anonymizer 54 relays the order information to payee 56 (via PSTN 30 or other communication channel), but does not relay the other information about subscriber 58. Instead, anonymizer 54 may pass along limited information about subscriber 58. The information passed along is authorized by subscriber 58. For example, anonymizer 54 may pass along an address to which delivery is requested. In addition, payee 56 may pass information to anonymizer 54 to be relayed to subscriber 58, such as a confirmation number, or a demand for additional information. Anonymizer 54 may also pass along to payee 56 personal information about subscriber 58, as will be described in more detail below. After receiving a satisfactory order, payee 56 provides the products or services to subscriber 58 or to a recipient designated by subscriber 58.

Payment for the products or services may be handled in several ways. As shown in FIG. 3, a voucher may be passed to anonymizer 54, which relays an anonymizer voucher to payee 56. In general, a voucher represents an electronic payment authorization, such as a credit or other record exchangeable for payment. The voucher transmitted by anonymizer 54 to payee 56 may also represent a guarantee of payment, such that payee 56 does not bear a risk of nonpayment for products or services delivered.

Subscriber 58 ultimately pays for the goods or services provided by payee 56, but subscriber 58 typically pays an entity other than payee 56. For example, as illustrated in FIG. 3, an arrangement between the GSM provider 22 and the anonymity service provider results in a voucher being transmitted from GSM system 52 to anonymizer 54. The bill for the goods or services may be added to the bill for GSM service sent to subscriber 58 by GSM provider 22. Alternatively, the bill for the goods or services is then to the bill sent to subscriber 58 by the anonymity service provider.

A system diagram of anonymizer 54 is shown in FIG. 4. Anonymizer 54 includes communication interfaces 80 and 82, by which anonymizer 54 connects to PSTN 30 or ISDN 24, and by which anonymizer 54 communicates with subscriber 58 and payee 56. In some circumstances anonymizer 54 may function with a single communication interface. Anonymizer 54 also may include database 86, which stores information about subscribers, including directives as to the degree of anonymity desired by each subscriber.

Anonymizer 54 further includes processor 84, which performs several functions associated with anonymity service. For example, processor 84 retrieves information from database 86 about subscribers' desired anonymity. Processor 84 also receives subscribers' orders from one communication interface 80 and relays the orders via a second communication interface 82. In addition, processor 84 stores subscriber information in database 86. Anonymizer 54 may be implemented, for example, as a computer system. Techniques employed by anonymizer 54 may be implemented as software, which may be stored in a machine or computer system on any machine-readable medium such as a magnetic disk or optical drive, or may be stored within non-volatile memory such as read-only memory (ROM).

FIG. 5 is a flowchart illustrating techniques for providing anonymizer service. In an exemplary configuration, anonymizer 54 receives data related to a subscriber's order, such as the identity of the payee, the product or service desired, and the quality or quantity desired (90). Anonymizer 54 also receives data identifying the subscriber (90). Anonymizer 54 retrieves from its database information about the subscriber, including, for example, the degree of privacy to be afforded the subscriber.

Several degrees of privacy may be offered, providing a range of anonymity. One degree of anonymity is total anonymity. A payee receives no personal information about a subscriber having total anonymity. The subscriber may specify a lesser degree of anonymity by allowing anonymizer 54 to relay to payee 56, for example, information about the subscriber's name but not information about the subscriber's address, telephone number or calling patterns. The subscriber may also specify that information about him be kept from payee 56, but that demographic information about him be disclosed. A subscriber may permit payee 56 to know the town where subscriber lives, for example, without disclosing the subscriber's name or address. A subscriber may also provide payee 56 with a pseudonym or a frequent-purchaser identification code. Another form of anonymity may vary on the basis of the identity of the payee. The subscriber may authorize disclosure of more personal data when ordering airplane tickets, for example, than when ordering flowers. A further form of anonymity involves “negotiated anonymity,” which will be explained in more detail below.

After retrieving the information from the database (92), anonymizer 54 relays data to payee 56, such as the order and voucher information (94). Anonymizer 54 may also pass along to payee 56 anonymous identification data, i.e., data about the identity of the subscriber that the subscriber has authorized to be passed along. In addition, anonymizer 54 ordinarily processes the transaction (96), which may include debiting the subscriber's account for the voucher issued to payee 56, or acknowledging a voucher received from GSM provider 22. Anonymizer 54 may also relay information from payee 56 to the subscriber, such as a confirmation number (98).

As described above, anonymizer 54 may provide a range of anonymity. FIG. 6 is a flowchart illustrating a variable anonymity technique. In this technique, the degree of anonymity may become part of the transaction, and is automatically “negotiated” by anonymizer 54 on behalf of subscriber 58 and payee 56. Anonymizer 54 relays an anonymous order for a product or service to payee 56 (100), and includes an offer to provide additional information about subscriber 58 in exchange for consideration from payee 56, such as a discount. The offer is pre-authorized by subscriber 58. If payee 56 accepts (104), anonymizer 54 provides the additional information to payee 56 (110) and the transaction proceeds (112). Payee 56 may reject the offer and put forth a counteroffer (106). Payee's counteroffer may, for example, propose a smaller discount or request more information. Anonymizer 54 evaluates the counteroffer according to parameters previously authorized by subscriber 58, which are stored in database 86. If the counteroffer is not within the parameters, the counteroffer is rejected (114) and the transaction proceeds (112). If the counteroffer is accepted, anonymizer 54 provides the additional information to payee 56 (110) and the transaction proceeds (112).

The techniques shown in FIG. 6 are for purposes of illustration. Variations of the techniques are possible. For example, payee 56 may initiate the offer to provide the product or service at a discount if additional information is provided, and anonymizer 54 may counteroffer. Subscriber 58 may also specify a range of permissible prices, quantities or degrees of personal information, allowing further offers and counteroffers. In addition, payee 56 may refuse to accept anonymous orders, in which case its counteroffer represents a stipulation that unless certain information is provided, there will be no transaction.

A number of embodiments of the invention have been described. Although the techniques for maintaining various degrees of anonymity have been described in the context of a GSM network, they may be adapted to any network in which a subscriber wishes to avoid having personal information passed to a payee. These and other embodiments are within the scope of the following claims.

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US5583918 *Jul 20, 1994Dec 10, 1996Fujitsu LimitedCredit card-based accounting service system for a network
US5896499Feb 21, 1997Apr 20, 1999International Business Machines CorporationEmbedded security processor
US6151588 *Feb 9, 1998Nov 21, 2000Tradecard, Inc.Full service trade system
US6370514 *Aug 2, 1999Apr 9, 2002Marc A. MessnerMethod for marketing and redeeming vouchers for use in online purchases
US6516996 *Mar 17, 2000Feb 11, 2003Nokia Networks OyElectronic payment system
US6646659 *Dec 17, 1999Nov 11, 2003International Business Machines CorporationMethod, system and program for specifying an electronic food menu with food preferences from a universally accessible database
US20020023006 *Dec 27, 2000Feb 21, 2002Net Protections, Inc.System and method of electronic commerce
US20020035538 *Jan 16, 2001Mar 21, 2002Moreau Lawrence R.Method and system for facilitating buying and selling transactions
US20020069114 *Dec 1, 2000Jun 6, 2002Charette Phillip CarlMethod and system for placing a purchase order over a communications network
US20020069166 *Jan 29, 2001Jun 6, 2002Moreau Lawrence R.Method and system for facilitating buying and selling transactions
US20040198373 *Dec 3, 2002Oct 7, 2004Ford Daniel AlexanderSystem and method to anonymously test for proximity of mobile users without revealing individual phase space coordinates
EP0965902A2May 5, 1995Dec 22, 1999National Semiconductor CorporationSecure data processor with cryptography and tamper detection
KR20000068469A Title not available
WO1996013814A1Oct 25, 1995May 9, 1996Behruz VazvanReal time tele-payment system
WO1998010361A1Sep 4, 1997Mar 12, 1998Walker Asset Management LtdConditional purchase offer management systems
WO2002054321A2Dec 20, 2001Jul 11, 2002Intel CorpAnonymous electronic transactions
Non-Patent Citations
Reference
1Communication issued in related European Patent Application (8 pp.).
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US7567936Oct 15, 2004Jul 28, 2009Paradox Technical Solutions LlcMethod and apparatus for handling pseudo identities
US7890920 *Apr 30, 2009Feb 15, 2011International Business Machines CorporationStorage medium for storing a program for executing the product purchasing method, and a server used therefor
US8001047Jun 15, 2005Aug 16, 2011Paradox Technical Solutions LlcMethod and apparatus for effecting payment
US8250225Oct 15, 2004Aug 21, 2012Paradox Technical Solutions LlcGeneration of suffixes for pseudo e-mail addresses
US8374577 *Jun 18, 2002Feb 12, 2013Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ)Parallel coordinated operations in private domains
Classifications
U.S. Classification455/406, 455/410, 455/409
International ClassificationG06Q20/00, H04M11/00, G06Q30/00
Cooperative ClassificationG06Q20/04, G06Q30/0635, G06Q30/06, G06Q20/32, G06Q20/425, G06Q20/045, G06Q20/16, G06Q20/24, G06Q20/02, G06Q20/3229
European ClassificationG06Q20/24, G06Q20/32, G06Q20/16, G06Q30/06, G06Q20/04, G06Q20/02, G06Q20/425, G06Q20/045, G06Q20/3229
Legal Events
DateCodeEventDescription
Jan 5, 2011FPAYFee payment
Year of fee payment: 4
Jun 19, 2001ASAssignment
Owner name: INTEL CORPORATION, CALIFORNIA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:SULLIVAN, ROB;AUCSMITH, DAVID W.;REEL/FRAME:011906/0114;SIGNING DATES FROM 20010326 TO 20010515