|Publication number||US7274736 B2|
|Application number||US 10/274,322|
|Publication date||Sep 25, 2007|
|Filing date||Oct 18, 2002|
|Priority date||Oct 24, 2001|
|Also published as||US20030091133|
|Publication number||10274322, 274322, US 7274736 B2, US 7274736B2, US-B2-7274736, US7274736 B2, US7274736B2|
|Inventors||Arthur John Redfern, Nirmal C. Warke, Ming Ding|
|Original Assignee||Texas Instruments Incorporated|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (13), Non-Patent Citations (2), Referenced by (1), Classifications (19), Legal Events (3)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
This application claims right of priority under 35 U.S.C. 119 for provisional applications Ser. No. 60/334,999 filed Oct. 24, 2001, Ser. No. 60/342,618 filed Dec. 27, 2001, and Ser. No. 60/351,430 filed Jan. 28, 2002 entitled “Dual Path Equalization For Multicarrier Systems” by same inventors Arthur John Redfern; Nirmal C. Warke and Ming Ding. This application is incorporated herein by reference.
This invention relates to communication systems using multicarrier modulation and more particularly to multiple path equalization of multicarrier communication systems.
Most modem communications systems that operate near theoretical capacity limits employ equalization in the receiver to maximize the data rate. Multicarrier modulation systems such as discrete multitone (DMT) often use both time-domain equalization and frequency-domain equalization.
In typical DMT systems, data is segmented into blocks of N samples. At the transmitter, an inverse fast Fourier transform (IFFT) of the data is taken, and a cyclic prefix is appended to the beginning. For a length L cyclic prefix, this is done by appending the last L samples of the IFFT of the data to the beginning. At the receiver, the first L samples are skipped, and the remaining N samples are processed. If the channel length is shortened by the time-domain equalizer (TEQ) to L+1 samples or less, then the original data can be recovered by taking the fast Fourier transform (FFT) of the remaining N samples, and multiplying each resulting sample by the corresponding complex frequency-domain equalizer (FEQ) coefficient (effectively undoing the effects of the combined channel response at that frequency).
In order to achieve near capacity data rates the TEQ needs to compensate for intersymbol interference (ISI) due to the channel while at the same time appropriately filtering impairments such as echo, crosstalk, and radio frequency interference (RFI). These impairments tend to affect different parts of the channel. For typical frequency division duplex (FDD) deployments of asymmetrical digital subscriber lines (ADSL), a common DMT system, there is strong ISI (from bandsplit filters) and a large echo near the transition band. Higher up in frequency and farther away from the transition band the ISI and echo are less severe, but RFI is more likely to be present.
Using a single TEQ/FEQ to compensate for the impairments that affect different parts of the channel results in a performance tradeoff. The best TEQ in terms of data rate is not necessarily optimal for any particular part of the channel; however, it is also not bad for any particular part of the channel.
In accordance with one embodiment of the present invention a dual path equalization structure is used to equalize DMT systems operating over channels in which different impairments dominate the performance of different parts of the channel. Two TEQ/DFT structures are used to process the received signal, each optimized for a different part of the channel. The outputs of the two paths are combined with appropriate frequency-domain equalization to achieve an overall equalization architecture which is better optimized for the whole channel.
The basic teaching behind the design of the dual path equalizer is to divide the channel into two parts, each part dominated by a different type of impairment. The first equalization path is optimized for one part of the channel, and the second equalization path for the other part of the channel. TEQ design techniques such as minimum ISI, minimum mean squared error (MSE), eigenvector based, least squares (and adapted variants), and maximum bit rate methods can be used to design the TEQs used in the different parts of the channel.
For a FDD ADSL system operating on a typical wireline channel, this can be done for the downstream by dividing the downstream portion of the channel into the downstream region near the transition band, and the downstream region higher up in frequency. The transition band or region is the region of the channel that separates the upstream subchannels and the downstream subchannels. For example, if subchannels 6-31 are used for the upstream and subchannels 39-255 for the downstream, then the transition band would comprise subchannels 32-38. Note that there is a direct mapping between subchannels and frequencies.
As previously indicated, the area around the transition region is dominated by the echo from the upstream and strong ISI from the bandsplit filters. The subchannels higher up in frequency tends to have milder ISI and impairments such as RFI.
Path 1: Optimized for the Region Near the Transition Band
TEQ 1 could be trained without the transmit signal such that the echo does not limit its performance. An echo canceller (EC) is present to remove the echo energy (which tends to be strong in this part of the channel) while leaving behind the received signal. Because the echo canceller is located after the TEQ 1, both standard time-domain and frequency-domain updates can be used. Note that the presence of the echo canceller allows less severe transmit and receive filters, which simplifies the task of TEQ 1.
Buffer 1 is used to convert from sample by sample processing (done by the TEQ and possibly the EC) to block by block processing (done by the window, FFT, and FEQ).
Because RFI is less of a problem in this part of the channel, the time-domain window length at window 1 would tend to be zero, making the windowing operation equivalent to prefix removal. The output of window 1 is applied to the first FFT (FFT 1), used to demodulate the received signal, followed by FEQ 1, used to compensate for the individual subchannel responses.The windowing operation performs windowing on the noise on paths where narrow band interferes effect performance. Receiver windowing is well known to those of ordinary skill in the art. For example, see article entitled “Receiver Window Design for Multicarrier Communications System” by Arthur Redfern in Selected Areas in Communications, Volume 20, Issue 5, June 2002, page(s); 1029-1036. Also see many receiver windowing articles cited in the paper.
Path 2: Optimized for the Remainder of the Channel
The lower path in
A high pass filter (HPF) is included to remove the echo energy (which can spread to higher subchannels but is difficult to cancel because of the large received signal). TEQ 2 is designed to provide a high signal to noise ratio (SNR) across the band.
Buffer 2 is used to convert from sample by sample processing (done by the TEQ) to block by block processing (done by the window, FFT, and FEQ).
Window 2, which also includes prefix removal, can be made nonzero in length to improve RFI performance. Making the window nonzero in length does not significantly degrade the performance of TEQ 2, since the task of the equalizer is easier on this part of the channel. The output of window 2 is applied to the second FFT (FFT 2), used to demodulate the received signal, followed by FEQ 2, used to compensate for the individual subchannel responses.
Combining the Outputs of the Paths
Combining the results of the two paths can be done in a variety of ways to yield different results.
The simplest method of combining the two paths is to measure the signal to noise ratio (SNR) for each path on a subchannel by subchannel basis, and for each subchannel select the output of the path with the best SNR. If the first path is optimized for the transition band and the second path is optimized for the remainder of the channel, then it would be expected that the best SNR subchannels around the transition band would come from path 1, and the best SNR subchannels for the remainder of the band would come from path 2. In this case the combining (selection) could be done after the FFT and only a single FEQ is required as illustrated in
An alternative is to exploit the differences in the noise on the two paths, and appropriately sum the scaled subchannels to further improve the SNR. The scaling is done to give more weight to the subchannel on the path with the better SNR. In order for this to be effective, some noise sources (e.g., residential ISI, residual echo) need to be uncorrelated across the two paths.
A third possibility that the dual path structure allows is to implement a complex coefficient TEQ. Since the received signal is real, there is no coupling between the first and second paths (which can be viewed as the real and imaginary paths). After the FFT, the outputs of the two paths can be summed after multiplying the second path by imaginary 1. In this case only a single FEQ is required.
The above embodiment is by way of example. The dual path equalization architecture may only include the time-domain equalizers and need not include the echo canceller or the high pass filter. These may be added or removed depending on the system requirements. While dual paths are illustrated any number of multiple paths may be used. It will be understood by those skilled in the art that other embodiments of the invention, variations, and modifications will be apparent from a consideration of the specification as disclosed herein and fall within the scope of the invention as defined by the following claims.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US6240129 *||Jul 10, 1998||May 29, 2001||Alcatel||Method and windowing unit to reduce leakage, fourier transformer and DMT modem wherein the unit is used|
|US6353629 *||Apr 24, 1998||Mar 5, 2002||Texas Instruments Incorporated||Poly-path time domain equalization|
|US6408022 *||May 11, 1999||Jun 18, 2002||Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson||Equalizer for use in multi-carrier modulation systems|
|US6456673 *||Nov 30, 1999||Sep 24, 2002||Amati Communications Corporation||Digital radio frequency interference canceller|
|US6687291 *||Feb 4, 2000||Feb 3, 2004||Electroincs And Telecommunications Research Institute||Time-domain equalizer of cascaded filters for VDSL|
|US6690717 *||Feb 4, 2000||Feb 10, 2004||Electronics And Telecommunications Research Institute||Multi-tone transceiver system using two steps of DMT-CMFB|
|US6754262 *||Apr 7, 2000||Jun 22, 2004||Zenith Electronics Corporation||Multipath ghost eliminating equalizer with optimum noise enhancement|
|US6781965 *||Apr 5, 2000||Aug 24, 2004||Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.||Method and apparatus for echo cancellation updates in a multicarrier transceiver system|
|US6782005 *||Jun 4, 1999||Aug 24, 2004||Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha||Communication system and communication method|
|US7023938 *||Apr 8, 1999||Apr 4, 2006||Nec Usa, Inc.||Receiver for discrete multitone modulated signals having window function|
|US7031379 *||Aug 24, 2001||Apr 18, 2006||Texas Instruments Incorporated||Time domain equalizer for DMT modulation|
|US20020048334 *||Mar 12, 2001||Apr 25, 2002||Kazutomo Hasegawa||Bit allocation method and apparatus therefor|
|US20030118094 *||Dec 21, 2001||Jun 26, 2003||Chih-Chi Wang||Mixed time and frequency domains equalization algorithm for ADSL systems|
|1||*||Qian et al, "Space Dirversity Reception and Parallel Blind Equalization in Short-Burst TDMA Systems", IEEE Transactaions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 51, No. 1, Jan. 2002, pp. 122-129.|
|2||*||Shimamura, Tetsuya, "A Parallel Equaliser with LMS Adaptation for Time Variant Multipath Channels", The 1998 IEEE Asia-Pacific Conference on Circuits and Systems, Nov. 24-27, 1998, pp. 439-442.|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US20110249709 *||Apr 8, 2010||Oct 13, 2011||Muh-Tian Shiue||DHT-Based OFDM Transmitter and Receiver|
|U.S. Classification||375/229, 708/323, 375/285, 375/346, 333/166, 375/240.27, 708/300, 333/28.00R|
|International Classification||H04B3/14, H04B1/10, H04N7/12, H04B15/00, H04B1/66, H04L25/03|
|Cooperative Classification||H04L25/03159, H04L2025/03414, H04L25/03019|
|European Classification||H04L25/03B3, H04L25/03B1A|
|Oct 18, 2002||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INCORPORATED, TEXAS
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:REDFERN, ARTHUR J.;WARKE, NIRMAL C.;DING, MING;REEL/FRAME:013410/0933;SIGNING DATES FROM 20020118 TO 20020201
|Feb 18, 2011||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|Feb 25, 2015||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 8