Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS730366 A
Publication typeGrant
Publication dateJun 9, 1903
Filing dateJun 19, 1902
Priority dateJun 19, 1902
Publication numberUS 730366 A, US 730366A, US-A-730366, US730366 A, US730366A
InventorsPercy John Moore Gunthorp
Original AssigneePercy John Moore Gunthorp
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Support for weak or deformed feet.
US 730366 A
Abstract  available in
Images(2)
Previous page
Next page
Claims  available in
Description  (OCR text may contain errors)

N0.'73Q,366| PATENTED JUNE 9, 1903.

I SUPPORT FOR WBAKORDEFORMED FEET.

1 .nruoux on run was 10. 1902. no 1011221.. I v I 2 sums-sum 1.

.the sole.

N'D- 730,366; a

' UNITED STATES PATENT Patented June 9, 1903.

OFFICE.

SUPPORT FoRwEAK 0F: DEFORMED- FEET.

SPECIFICATION forming part of Letters Patent No. 7 30,366, dated June 9, 1903. Applioationfiledlune19,1902. Serial is. 1125375. iN'o model-l To all whmn it mag concern? 7 Be it known that I, PERCY JOHN MOORE GUNTHORP, asubject of the King of England,

residing at London, England, have invented certain new and useful Improvements in or Relating to Supports for l/Veak or Deformed Feet, of which the following is a specification.

This invention relates to supports for weak or deformed feet, and has specialireference to what may be termed sock'-'supportsthat is, supports which are not permanently attached to the boot or shoe, but are contained within it when in use.

The foot-supports according to this invention are specially intended for the relief or cure of F valgus, or flat foot, and comprise a sole portion formed to suit the shape of the foot and throw it into a desired position and a lateral extension on each side of the sole to keep the support in position relatively to the foot, such lateral extensions being stiffened by a spring which extends transversely across In some cases-of fiat foot there is a tendency for the fore .part of the foot to fall downward, and to remedy this the foot-support may be provided with a back piece, which partially embraces the lower part of the back of the leg in proximity to the ankle.

and is connected 'to the sole or platform or to the lateral extensions by a rubber strap or straps or other elasticor springy members.

It is preferred toprovide the foot-support with a padof rubbelyfelt, or other suitable material to support the arch of the foot, but where desirable the sole may be made rigid.

The lateral extensions may be prolonged in an upward direction and molded to suit the shape of the ankle, and consequentlysup-' port it. I j

In cases where the valgus is complicated by hallux valg'us the sole is provided with a movable toe splint or support, the position of which is capable of adjustment, so that the cverted toe can be gradually restored to its proper position with less inconvenience to the wearer than is the case where a permanentlyfixed splint is used.

In the accompanying drawings, Figure l is a perspective view of one form of foot-support according to this invention, provided with a movable toe-splint. Fig. 2 is a side elevation of a toe-splint. Fig. 3 shows a footstiif longitudinal springs.

support viewed from the inside ofthe foot and with portions removed to show the shape of thelateral extension. Fig. at is a perspective viewof afoot-support provided with a springcontrolledback piece, and Fig. 5 is a similar view showing a foot-support with the lateral extensions prolonged to support the ankle. Fig. dis a transverse section taken through the spring and arch-support, the outer covering being removed.

With reference first to Fig. 1, A is the sole sole, and. kept in place or stiffened by a trans-.

verse spring D, the ends of which are turned up and secured to the extensions G and C, respectively. It will be noticed that although this transverse spring keeps the lateral extensions in place against the foot it cannot interfere with the natural movement of the arch of the foot, a disadvantage which is present in any foot-support provided with The transverse spring D may be divided beneath the center of the foot to give still further flexibility to the support.) As an additional means of securing the flexibility of the foot-support the lateral extension Oon the inside of the foot isspreferably shaped somewhat as shown in Fig. 3, where the thin leather covering E, which envelops. the support, is shown stripped elf-to display the lateral extension. Itwill be seen from this figure that the extension 0 is, owing to thepresence of the end of the springs D andto its shape, made stiffest at its central portion adjacent to the top of the arch of the foot, and by this means the whole support is more flexible than would be the case if the lateral extension were not so shaped.

The front portion of the sole A is preferably very thin, so that it may be cut, say, with a pair of scissors, to suit the particular boot worn. The thickened portion A A would of course be made to suit'the shape of the foot fitted. For instance, should the joint of the great toe be abnormally large a depression would be formed in the sole beneath it to allow that joint to fall below the level of the other toe-joints, and in that case the thickened portion of the sole could be continued across it to the outer edge.

F is a movable toe-splint pivoted to the sole, as at F, and provided at its free end with a pin F The splint can be turned about its pivot -F so that the pin F engages with one of a number of holes F in the sole. Conveniently the pin F is screwed and a nut F' fitted to it, by means of which the splint may be fixed after its position has been adjusted. If desired, grooves may be formed in the sole A into which the lower edge of the splint can fit.

In the form of foot-support shown in Fig. 4 the lateral extensions are carried right around the heel in a slipper-like fashion, and a hinged back piece G is provided, attached to the lateral extensions by rubber straps II. The dotted position of the back support G (shown in Fig. 4) indicates approximately the position which it occupies when the support is in use, and obviously the rubber straps H, being in tension, will, acting in conjunction with the sole A and the back support G, tend to prevent the dropping of the fore part of the foot. A padded strap J is provided to fasten over the instep. This particular form of support is useful in cases of cavus, or exaggerated hollow under the foot, the opposite deformity to fiat foot, or valgus. As these cases are usually complicated with equinus that is, the tendency of the fore part of the foot to drop-the back support G, with its tension straps H, is often a necessity.

Fig. 5 shows a foot-support in which the lateral extensions 0 are prolonged so as to just cover the ankle without impeding its movement. In this case the extensions are molded to suit the shape of the ankle where necessary and the transverse spring D is pref erably curved and brought right over the ankle. To give further pliability to the sole portion, the lower part of the lateral extension 0 may be cut away as indicated by the dotted lines 0 Various materials may be used in constructing the improved foot-supports, a very suitable one being the special preparation of felt known in the trade as Poroplastic.

What I claim as my invention, and desire to secure by Letters Patent, is

1. A foot-support adapted to be contained in a boot or shoe and comprising a sole por' 'tion' formed to suit the shape of the foot, a lateral extension at each side thereof, a transverse supporting-spring extending across the sole and up the lateral extensions and a spring-controlled back piece substantially as set forth.

2. A foot-support'adapted to be contained in a boot or shoe and comprising a sole portion formed to suit the shape of the foot, a lateral extension at each side thereof and a transverse supportingspring extending across the sole and up the lateral extensions substantially as set forth.

In testimony whereof I have signed my name to this specification in the presence of two subscribing witnesses.

PERCY JOHN MOORE GUN'IHORP.

\Vitnesses:

ARCHD J. FRENCH, HARRY N. BIDGE.

Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US2423622 *Oct 2, 1945Jul 8, 1947Herman L SamblanetSesamoid-cuboid foot balancer
US2507120 *Jun 19, 1946May 9, 1950Martin ShapiroShoe with movable thonged upper
US2539557 *Oct 14, 1949Jan 30, 1951William B StroupShoe construction
US3586003 *Apr 28, 1969Jun 22, 1971Bowen Duane CMeans for supporting a flat foot
US4759357 *Jan 28, 1987Jul 26, 1988Gerard AllartPodiatric orthesis for orientation of the calcaneus and subtalar bones
US4846744 *Nov 12, 1987Jul 11, 1989Windsurfing Hawaii, Inc.Adjustable footstrap for sailboard
US5317820 *Aug 21, 1992Jun 7, 1994Oansh Designs, Ltd.Multi-application ankle support footwear
US5379530 *Nov 16, 1993Jan 10, 1995Oansh Designs, Ltd.Multi-application ankle support footwear
US5400529 *Jun 22, 1993Mar 28, 1995Oansh Designs, Ltd.Sports medicine shoe
US5438769 *Mar 17, 1993Aug 8, 1995Alpine Stars S.P.A.Ankle supporting device, particularly for motorcycling boots
US5771609 *Oct 28, 1996Jun 30, 1998Salomon S.A.Snowboard boot with inner stiffening assembly
US5915820 *Aug 20, 1996Jun 29, 1999Adidas A GShoe having an internal chassis
US5937546 *Jun 19, 1998Aug 17, 1999Salomon S.A.Snowboard boot with inner stiffening assembly
US6119373 *Jul 9, 1998Sep 19, 2000Adidas International B.V.Shoe having an external chassis
US6138384 *May 25, 1999Oct 31, 2000Salomon S. A.Snowboard boot with inner stiffening assembly
US6401366 *Apr 16, 1999Jun 11, 2002Nike, Inc.Athletic shoe with stabilizing frame
US6438873Aug 7, 2000Aug 27, 2002Adidas International B.V.Shoe having an external chassis
US6658766May 4, 2000Dec 9, 2003Adidas A.G.Shoe having an internal chassis
US6704941 *Mar 10, 2003Mar 16, 2004Donna M. PalmPedicure protection device
US6857205May 9, 2002Feb 22, 2005Nike, Inc.Article of footwear having a sole structure with a split plate
US6925734Sep 17, 2002Aug 9, 2005Reebok International Ltd.Shoe with an arch support
US6968637Mar 6, 2002Nov 29, 2005Nike, Inc.Sole-mounted footwear stability system
US8739434Jan 11, 2011Jun 3, 2014Felicia Hwang BishopFootwear with toe aligner structure
US20130061496 *Jan 23, 2012Mar 14, 2013Kevin B. LawlorFootwear support structures
WO2006102629A2 *Mar 23, 2006Sep 28, 2006Gallegos Alvaro ZShoe slimming insole
Classifications
International ClassificationA43B7/18
Cooperative ClassificationA43B7/18
European ClassificationA43B7/18