Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS7313366 B1
Publication typeGrant
Application numberUS 09/743,668
PCT numberPCT/EP1999/004665
Publication dateDec 25, 2007
Filing dateJul 5, 1999
Priority dateJul 15, 1998
Fee statusPaid
Also published asCN1146124C, CN1310885A, DE69903856D1, DE69903856T2, EP1145448A2, EP1145448A3, EP1145448B1, WO2000004659A2, WO2000004659A3
Publication number09743668, 743668, PCT/1999/4665, PCT/EP/1999/004665, PCT/EP/1999/04665, PCT/EP/99/004665, PCT/EP/99/04665, PCT/EP1999/004665, PCT/EP1999/04665, PCT/EP1999004665, PCT/EP199904665, PCT/EP99/004665, PCT/EP99/04665, PCT/EP99004665, PCT/EP9904665, US 7313366 B1, US 7313366B1, US-B1-7313366, US7313366 B1, US7313366B1
InventorsRobert Owen Bristow
Original AssigneeTelefonktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ)
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Radio communications unit
US 7313366 B1
Abstract
There is described a radio communications system, including a unit which is able to communicate over a radio communications network such as a satellite or cellular system, and is also able to communicate with a device such as a portable handset over a short range radio link. In order to avoid potentially troublesome interference on the communications path with the communications network, the unit is able to detect the strength of signals received on the short range radio link, and alert the user if those signals are such as to be a potential source of interference.
Images(2)
Previous page
Next page
Claims(1)
1. A communications system comprising:
a communications device,
a remote unit;
the communications device comprising:
a first transceiver for communicating over a first communication network;
a second transceiver for communicating with the remote unit;
means for detecting signal strengths of potentially interfering signals; means for providing an alert signal if the detected signal strengths exceed a predetermined threshold; and
means for transmitting the alert signal to the remote unit;
the remote unit comprising:
means for receiving an alert signal; and
means for ceasing further radio transmissions to the communications device in response thereto; and
wherein the communications device and the remote unit each comprise an infrared transceiver, and further comprising means for switching further transmissions to the infrared transceivers in response to the alert signal.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

This invention relates to a radio communications unit, and more particularly to a unit which is able to communicate over a radio communications network such as a satellite or cellular system, and is also able to communicate with a device such as a portable handset over a short range radio link.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

A potential disadvantage with the use of units of the general type mentioned above is that there may be interference signals appearing on the frequency at which the unit communicates with the communication network such as the satellite or cellular network. In particular, signals received on the short range radio link may be a source of such interference.

A problem therefore arises with such units as to how to avoid interference of this type.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In accordance with the invention, interference on the communications path with the communications network is avoided by detecting the strength of signals received on the short range radio link, and alerting the user if those signals are such as to be a potential source of interference.

In particular, a unit in accordance with the invention comprises a first transceiver for communicating over a communications network such as a cellular or satellite system, and a second transceiver for communicating with a device such as a portable handset over a short range radio link. The unit further comprises means for detecting the signal strength of signals received over the short range radio link, and means for comparing that signal strength with a predetermined threshold. The unit further comprises means for alerting the user in the event that the threshold is exceeded.

This has the advantage that communications over the short range radio link can then be suspended to avoid the possibility of such interference.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWING

FIG. 1 is a block schematic diagram of a system in accordance with the invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

For a better understanding of the present invention, and to show how it may be put into effect, reference will now be made, by way of example, to the accompanying drawing.

FIG. 1 shows a system in accordance with the invention.

The system 2 includes a first antenna 4, connected to transceiver circuitry 6, for communication over a radio communications network. In one preferred embodiment of the invention, the transceiver circuitry 6 is adapted for communication over a conventional cellular network, although it may equally be adapted for communication over a satellite network, or indeed any other radio communications network.

The unit 2 further comprises a second antenna 8, and transceiver circuitry 10, for communication over a short range radio link. FIG. 1 further shows a portable handset 12, having its own antenna 14, for communication over the same link with the unit 2. Although the invention is described herein with reference to communication over the short range radio link with a portable handset 12, it will be appreciated that this device may be any device which is located remotely from the system 2, or at least is moveable relative thereto.

For example, the unit 2 may be adapted for communication over a Globalstar satellite network, transmitting on channels in the band from 1610-1627 MHz, and receiving signals from the satellite on channels in the band from 2480-2500 MHz. The short range link can advantageously operate in the internationally recognised ISM band from 2400-2480 MHz, both to transmit and to receive.

The system 2 includes a satellite baseband and control module 7, and a short range link baseband and control module 11. These modules 7, 11 receive data from the respective transceiver circuits 6, 10 and transmit them to the other transceiver circuit via the other module. Moreover, the modules 7, 11 send tuning and power control signals to their respective transceiver circuit 6, 10.

The system 2 further comprises a controlling and interfacing unit 16, which controls the overall operation of the device, and, in particular, sends and receives signals to and from the transceiver units 6, 10.

The control unit 16 includes means for determining the signal strengths of signals received from the remote unit 12 at the transceiver circuitry 10. The object is to determine when the signal from the remote unit 12, received at the system main unit 2, is sufficiently strong to provide a possible source of interference for the reception of signals at the transceiver 6. This may be achieved in different ways.

As a first example, a measurement may be made of the strength of the signal received from the remote unit 12 at the short range receiver circuit 10.

As a second alternative, a measurement may be made of the signal strength of the signal from the remote unit 12 in the main receiver unit 6.

As a third alternative, a measurement may be made in the main receiver unit 6 of the strength of a noise signal at the frequency which that receiver unit is using for reception of signals from the communications network.

In FIG. 1, the control unit 16 is shown as having inputs from both transceiver circuits 6, 10. However, depending on which of these alternatives is used, only one of the inputs may be required.

In the case of this third alternative, it can be determined that any received noise signal is a result of transmissions from the remote unit 12 in different ways.

As a first example, a correlation between the occurrence of a noise signal and a known time at which the remote unit 12 is transmitting may be used as an indication that it is the remote unit 12 which is the source of the noise signal.

As a second example, a correlation between transmissions from the remote unit 12 on particular frequencies, and the occurrence of noise in the receiver unit 6, may be used as an indication that transmissions from the remote unit 12 are the source of the noise signal in the receiver unit 6.

As a third example, signals transmitted from the remote unit 12 may include a code modulated thereon in any convenient way (for example, AM, PM or FM), and the receiver unit 6 may include means for demodulation of such a code for use as an indication that it is transmissions from the remote unit 12 which are the source of noise signals received in the receiver unit 6.

In any case, the detected signal strength is compared with a predetermined threshold, set in each case at a level which is determined on the basis of a signal strength which may be a troublesome source of interference in the receiver unit 6.

If it is determined by the control unit 16, on the basis of signal strength measurements taken on signals received at the receiver unit 6 or the receiver unit 10, as described above, an alerting signal is then generated. In a preferred embodiment of the invention, this alerting signal is generated in the controlling unit 16, sent via the short range link baseband and control module 11 and the transceiver circuit 10, and transmitted across the short range radio link to the remote unit 12. In the remote unit 12, such a signal is converted into an appropriate form of warning to the user of the device. For example, the warning may take the form of an audible message, stored in the remote unit and played back in response to the receipt of an alerting signal, or a visual message, displayed on the display device of the remote unit in response to the receipt of the alerting signal, for example.

Alternatively, since any warning is likely to be issued when the remote unit 12 is close to the main unit 2, it may be acceptable, and technically simpler, for the warning to be generated in the main unit.

Alternatively or, preferably, in addition, the controlling unit can issue a command to prevent further interfering transmissions from the remote unit 12 to the receiver unit 10. For example, if the signal strength of transmissions from the remote unit 12, received at the receiver unit 10, is sufficiently high to be a potential source of interference, this is likely to be because the remote unit 12 is very close to the system main unit 2. In such an event, it is highly probable that it will be acceptable to switch to an infrared communications link between the remote unit 12 and system main unit 2. To that end, in the preferred embodiment of the invention, the system main unit 2 includes an infrared transceiver 18, and the remote unit 12 includes an infrared transceiver 20.

As an alternative, the alerting message to the user may for example request that the user discontinue the use of the radio link and instead switch to a wired communication from the remote unit to the system main unit. Again, this may be acceptable if the reason for the interference is that the remote unit has moved close to the system main unit.

As a further alternative, the main unit 2 and remote unit 12 may include alternative transceivers, allowing communications to be switched to an alternative radio frequency band, which reduces the possibility of interference.

In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the circuitry described above may also be used to detect possible sources of interference originating other than in the radio frequency transmissions with the system main unit over the short range link. For example, transmissions over the radio communications network might suffer interference from other communications users, or even from non-communications sources of radio frequency signals such as microwave ovens.

The short range receiver unit 10 in the system main unit 2 is arranged to receive signals on channels which could potentially contain unwanted interference signals. Where the short range radio link between the system main unit 2 and the remote unit 12 is a frequency hopped system, the receiver unit 10 may hop to channels which are blocked by strong interference. In this event, the signal level is still measured, and used as a criterion to warn the user. If a strong signal occurs at a time when the error rate on the short range radio link is high, it can be inferred that the source of the signal is an unwanted third party interferer.

Alternatively, the receiver unit 6 in the system main unit 2 could be arranged to select channels which are more likely to be interfered with, and could then correlate the received noise signal with that on other channels. This would allow an inference to be made about the source of interference.

There is thus described a system which allows the possibility of interference on the main communications link to be reduced.

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US5001776 *Oct 27, 1988Mar 19, 1991Motorola Inc.In a two-way radio frequency
US5257397 *Aug 13, 1990Oct 26, 1993At&T Bell LaboratoriesMobile data telephone
US5375123Feb 5, 1993Dec 20, 1994Telefonakitebolaget L. M. EricssonAllocation of channels using interference estimation
US5418843Jun 24, 1993May 23, 1995TeleverketMethod for estimating traffic density in mobile telephone networks
US5574979 *Jun 3, 1994Nov 12, 1996Norand CorporationPeriodic interference avoidance in a wireless radio frequency communication system
US5603092Jul 31, 1995Feb 11, 1997TeleverketMethod for estimating C/I density and interference probability in the uplink
US5649290Dec 14, 1994Jul 15, 1997Lucent Technologies Inc.Handover method based upon channel quality
US5953661 *May 16, 1997Sep 14, 1999Nextel CommunicationsMethod of maximizing spectral efficiency in a cellular communications system
US6088589 *Dec 11, 1997Jul 11, 2000Ericsson Inc.System, method and apparatus for handling high-power notification messages
US6181946 *Aug 28, 1997Jan 30, 2001Motorola, Inc.Method for subscriber based management of neighbor list information during a communication session
US6233430 *Sep 19, 1997May 15, 2001Richard J. HelferichPaging transceivers and methods for selectively retrieving messages
US6272359 *Oct 30, 1997Aug 7, 2001Nokia Mobile Phones Ltd.Personal mobile communications device having multiple units
US6421328 *May 28, 1998Jul 16, 2002Northern Telecom LimitedNeighborhood list assimilation for cell-based microsystem
US6542758 *Jul 22, 1999Apr 1, 2003Ericsson Inc.Distributed radio telephone for use in a vehicle
DE3528886A1Aug 12, 1985Feb 19, 1987Siemens AgRadiotelephony system
GB2288101A Title not available
JPH0730983A Title not available
WO1992010046A1Sep 11, 1991Jun 11, 1992Light Ideas IncLight-linked cellular telephone
WO1993008655A1Aug 24, 1992Apr 18, 1993Motorola IncImproved gsm interference band selection and reduced power handover
WO1993014572A1Dec 14, 1992Jul 22, 1993Motorola IncMethod and apparatus for broken link detect using audio energy level
WO1995019084A1Jan 3, 1995Jul 13, 1995Thomson Consumer ElectronicsClear channel selection system for a cordless telephone
WO1996019873A1Nov 13, 1995Jun 27, 1996Motorola IncMethod and apparatus for mitigating interference in a communication system
Non-Patent Citations
Reference
1Novelty Search Report, Jan. 27, 2000.
2Tzimeas, K., International Search Report, International App. No. PCT/EP99/04665, Oct. 15, 1999, pp. 1-6.
3United Kingdom Search Report as Completed on Dec. 9, 1998, by Nigel Hall in connection with GB 9815392.7.
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US7738411 *Dec 21, 2001Jun 15, 2010Nokia CorporationArrangement for communicating information
US7860521 *Dec 26, 2007Dec 28, 2010Motorola, Inc.System and method for minimizing inter-communications system mobile station-to-mobile station interference
US8204445 *Jan 30, 2006Jun 19, 2012Cambridge Silicon Radio LimitedDetecting signals
Classifications
U.S. Classification455/63.1, 455/226.3, 455/226.2, 455/226.1
International ClassificationH04B1/40, H04B17/00, C12N15/54, H04B1/00, H04B7/185, H04W88/02
Cooperative ClassificationH04W88/02, H04B7/18513, H04B7/18532
European ClassificationH04W88/02, H04B7/185D2
Legal Events
DateCodeEventDescription
May 7, 2013ASAssignment
Owner name: CLUSTER LLC, SWEDEN
Free format text: NOTICE OF GRANT OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS;ASSIGNOR:UNWIRED PLANET, LLC;REEL/FRAME:030369/0601
Effective date: 20130213
Apr 15, 2013ASAssignment
Owner name: UNWIRED PLANET, LLC, NEVADA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:CLUSTER LLC;REEL/FRAME:030219/0001
Effective date: 20130213
Apr 11, 2013ASAssignment
Owner name: CLUSTER LLC, DELAWARE
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET L M ERICSSON (PUBL);REEL/FRAME:030201/0186
Effective date: 20130211
Jun 27, 2011FPAYFee payment
Year of fee payment: 4
Oct 7, 2008CCCertificate of correction
May 1, 2001ASAssignment
Owner name: TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL), SWEDEN
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:BRISTOW, ROBERT OWEN;REEL/FRAME:011760/0592
Effective date: 20010221