|Publication number||US7324221 B2|
|Application number||US 10/375,445|
|Publication date||Jan 29, 2008|
|Filing date||Feb 27, 2003|
|Priority date||Nov 6, 2002|
|Also published as||US20040085580|
|Publication number||10375445, 375445, US 7324221 B2, US 7324221B2, US-B2-7324221, US7324221 B2, US7324221B2|
|Inventors||Denis Kieran Kelleher, Bradley D. Kent, Warren G. Cohn|
|Original Assignee||Smartmix Technologies, Llc|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (11), Referenced by (1), Classifications (8), Legal Events (3)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
This application claims priority to a provisional application filed on Nov. 6, 2002 having application No. 60/424,096, the specification of which is incorporated herein by reference.
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a printing method, and more particularly, to a method of arranging multiple print jobs to allow printing of the multiple print jobs in a single run.
2. Related Art
With the advent of advanced computers and printing techniques, the cost of custom printing, particularly for advertising, has become more cost effective for smaller merchants. However, despite technological advances in the physical printing process, each print job, regardless of the size of the job, requires considerable set up time. In the case of large print jobs, the cost associated with set up is small compared to the overall coast of the job, due, in part, to economies of scale. In the case of relatively small print jobs however, the cost associated with set up becomes an increasingly higher percentage of the overall cost. Accordingly, at a certain job size, the cost of the print job set up becomes prohibitive compared to the actual cost of the printing. Thus, despite increasingly efficient printing techniques, the higher marginal costs of small print jobs continue to be a problem in the printing industry, especially in the area of targeted advertising.
While marketing may be accomplished by mass mailing of advertising literature, sophisticated data information collection schemes have made it more cost effective to target mailings to consumers who are most likely to respond to the advertisement. However, smaller merchants may have a limited advertising budget and a relatively small geographic marketing area as compared to larger, nationwide merchants. As a result, many smaller merchants cannot afford to use targeted mailings because of the high set up costs involved in printing a small job.
In addition to printing costs, mailing costs can also be prohibitively expensive for smaller merchants using targeted mailing. Notably, bulk mail quantities less than 200 mailpieces do not currently qualify for mailing discounts. One way to reduce postal costs is to provide the post office with mail pieces presorted by 3 digit sectional center facility (SCF) (the first three digits that indicate a postal facility that serves and the processing and distribution center for post offices in a designated geographic area), zip code, or by carrier route. Postal presorting refers to the process by which a mailer groups mailpieces by ZIP Code so that the mailpieces are sorted to the finest extent possible required by standards for which a specific mailing rate is claimed. Generally, presort is performed sequentially, from the lowest (finest) level to the highest level, to those destinations specified by the applicable standard and is completed at each level before the next level is prepared. Postal presorting with respect to postal recipient addresses involves physically separating mailpieces based on minimum qualifying quantities for a given classification of mail, such as carrier route (the addresses to which a mail carrier delivers mail), 3 digit (SCF) 5 digit ZIP code, a destination designation scheme, an automated area distribution center designation (AADC), or a mixed AADC groups. The more specific presorting of mail a sender can perform, the larger the discount. For example, a bulk mailing sorted by ZIP code receives a larger discount than a mailing presorted by SCF. Most importantly, there are minimum quantities required for a single job to qualify for discounted rates. For discounted standard mail, the mailing must contain a minimum of 200 mailpieces with at least 150 to a single 3 digit SCF postal region. For discounted first class mail, the mailing must contain at least 500 mailpieces with at least one full tray of 3 digit sorted mailpieces. Consequently, smaller merchants rarely can take advantage of the postage discounts afforded larger merchants because the quantity of the smaller merchants' custom mailpieces is often below the minimum thresholds set by the Post Office.
During printing of mailpieces, databases, postal hygiene software, and postal presorting software can be used to automatically presort in a computer and then print the mailpieces in sortation sequence ready to be bundled with the same presort group, such as SCF, Zip code, or carrier route. However, this method works best for volume runs. Small print jobs that would not normally qualify for discounts typically require mailing at a full first class rate and manual application of stamps. Alternatively, a batch of small jobs can be printed separately and combined, then presorted into appropriate ZIP code bins. Mail presorting facilities and mail presorting equipment can be used to presort mail, but these solutions can be prohibitively expensive, requiring costly mechanical automated equipment or extensive manual labor.
To qualify for bulk mailing discounts, mailpieces must be Coding Accuracy Support System (CASS) certified before mailing. CASS is a system designed to check the integrity of addresses within the United States. When an address passes through the CASS, it is verified against a database containing a comprehensive list of mailing address in the United States. This address database is issued by the USPS and is updated bimonthly. If an address passes this verification, four digits are appended to the end of the five digit ZIP code and three extra digits (a delivery point code) are added to a separate field created in the database. Additional information is also added to several other fields within the database for use by other software that sorts the addresses according to United States Postal Service (USPS) regulations for postal discounts. Both CASS certification and presort processing are required to take advantage of discounts offered by the USPS, and these savings can be significant. For instance, a letter that normally would cost $ 0.37 to mail, could cost as little as $0.174 by taking advantage of CASS and presorted bulk mail discounts. Furthermore, by bar-coding mailpieces, manual handling of mail and the associated costs are reduced. Normally, when a piece of mail enters the Post Office, it may be manually processed many times before being processed further by automated machinery for mailing. The same piece of mail, when bar-coded and presorted according to Post Office guidelines, can avoid most of the manual processes and several of the automated processes as well.
Accordingly, there is a need to provide a method for more economical printing of small print jobs by reducing the set up time for the job. In particular, there is a need to be able to process multiple print jobs in a single print run and allow the content of each page printed in the run to differ by as much as 100%. Further, there is a need to provide an efficient method of combined presorting of multiple different mail jobs during the computer preparation of these jobs such that they could be printed sequentially in presort sequence so that the different mail runs become a physical single job with appropriate mailing discounts and volume economies as the job exits the printing machine.
Generally, the present invention fulfills the foregoing needs by providing, in one aspect thereof, a method for merging and printing multiple postal presorted print jobs into a single print run for discounted rate mailing. The method further includes merging mail recipient address lists from a plurality of print job orders into a merged recipient address list. The method also includes associating printing content with each recipient in the merged mail recipient address list. The method further includes printing mailpieces in a presorted sequence by selectively applying associated printing content for each mail recipient in a presorted merged mail recipient address list.
In addition, the present invention provides, in another aspect thereof, a printing method for merging print jobs. The method includes receiving and maintaining a list of mailing recipients comprising addresses. The method also includes receiving a plurality of print job orders from senders, each order comprising unique print content and desired recipients. In addition, the method includes tagging recipients in the list of mailing recipients with a unique code corresponding to the desired recipients indicated in each of the print job orders to uniquely associate each sender with the desired recipients. The method further includes merging each of the print job orders into a merged print job and presorting the merged print job into a postal presorted print run according to the addresses of the combined mailing recipients. In addition, the method includes associating the print content received from each sender with each recipient tagged with the corresponding sender's unique code. The method further includes inserting the appropriate content in the postal presorted print run so that the print jobs orders are printed in a postal presorted sequence corresponding to the addresses of the mailing recipients.
The present invention further provides, in another aspect thereof, a computer system for merging and printing multiple postal presorted print jobs into a single print run for discounted rate mailing. The system further comprises a processor, for executing stored instructions and a storage device, coupled to the processor, for executing stored instructions to merge and print postal presorted print jobs.
The features of the invention believed to be novel are specifically set forth in the appended claims. The features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the following detailed description of the invention when read with the accompanying drawings in which:
In certain situations, for reasons of computational efficiency or ease of maintenance, the ordering of the blocks of the illustrated flow chart could be rearranged or moved inside or outside of the illustrated loops by one skilled in the art. While the present invention will be described with reference to the details of the embodiments of the invention shown in the drawing, these details are not intended to limit the scope of the invention.
Order lists provided by or acquired for mail sender customers, can include, for example, the following fields: name, address, city, state, zip, and a predetermined sender keycode. In an aspect of the invention, each order list is associated with a unique sender. A sender keycode contains a value that is unique to the sender and identifies the intended recipient records (for example, stored in a database and provided by the sender) as being the recipients who will receive a mailpiece from the sender corresponding to the keycode. Advantageously, most of the processes can be automated, primarily using software and computer technology, as indicated with reference to legend 18. At the heart of the invention is the process of setting up the print job 14 to incorporate a variety of individual job requests received from senders, which is more fully described with respect to
Multiple mailings from different senders can then be grouped together according to destination addresses of the mailpieces in a postal presorted print run to allow application of bulk discounts. For example, if there are 150 mailpieces to be mailed to ZIP code 34685, the system will automatically group the 150 mailpieces together in a postal presort group to allow application of presorting to a 5 digit ZIP code. In another example, if there are 45 mailpieces to be mailed to ZIP code 34685, 35 mailpieces to be mailed to ZIP code 34684, and 100 mailpieces to be mailed to ZIP code 34683, then the system would group the total of 180 mailpieces in a postal presort group for SCF 346 because none of the constituent groups has more than 150 mailpieces going to same ZIP code, and only an SCF discount would apply for the 180 piece postal presort group.
The postal presorted mailpieces are then printed with the appropriate printed content applied from each of the senders according to the keycode. Thus, the order of printed content applied to a mailpiece is not determined by the content as in conventional high volume mailpiece printing techniques, where the same basic template or form content is printed for consecutive presorted recipients. Rather, in an aspect of the invention, the printed content is applied according to the sender keycode associated with the consecutive presorted recipients, so that the printed content may change entirely for each mailpiece in a print run, thereby enabling multiple job printing and sorting to be performed simultaneously.
As shown in
The desired recipients of the printed mailpieces are tagged 27 with a keycode as being recipients of the corresponding sender specific mailpieces. After several print jobs have been received (generally, small print jobs that are too small to qualify for discounted mailing rates and would ordinarily need to be mailed at a full, undiscounted rate) and the appropriate recipients tagged with keycodes, the individual print jobs are merged into a print run 28. Merging the print runs allows creation of a large list that advantageously includes sufficient quantities of mailpieces for various postal destinations, such as SCF or ZIP code, to qualify for bulk mailing.
The print run is then presorted according to the tagged recipients' addresses 29, so that the run is in postal presort order. After sorting, the print content provided by the senders is associated to each of the recipients according to the keycodes 30, and the print run can then be printed 31. Accordingly, the recipients within the plurality of combined small print job orders are printed in a postal presort sequence, advantageously qualifying for significant postal discounts and mail shop economies of finishing volume jobs. For example, finishing may include trimming, cutting, folding, gluing, inserting or other paper finishing operations.
Generally, the detailed process includes accessing mailpiece order lists, merging the lists, presorting the merged lists, applying print sequences to the mailpieces based on imposition (arrangement/ordering of pages for printing multiple final pieces on one large sheet of paper to reduce paper/printing costs so that when the printed stack is cut, the stacks of finished mailpieces are in postal presort order) if required, applying a keycode to each recipient, replacing placeholder data, personalization, and creating a mailpiece print file comprising a variety of individually customized print jobs.
More specifically, as shown in
An iterative loop is then performed for each recipient in the master list 42 of the print sequence created in step 40 and the presort order created in step 38. For each recipient, the keycode for the recipient is retrieved 44, a copy of a sender mailpiece template (including, for example, text and graphic placeholders) corresponding to the keycode is opened 46. An iterative loop examining each text object and graphic object placeholder in the mailpiece template is performed 48. If an object is, or contains, a variable data placeholder 50, then the variable data or graphics placeholder is replaced with the corresponding data provided by the sender, for example, in an object incorporated into the sender's order list 52, This process continues until the end of the object list for the current mailpiece is reached 54. If an object is not a variable data placeholder in step 50, the process returns to step 48 and the next object is examined.
After the end of the object list for the current mailpiece is reached in step 54, the customized and personalized mailpiece is added to the end of the mailstream output 56, and the iterative process of step 42 repeated until the end of the recipient list 58 is reached. After the end of the recipient list is reached in step 60, the type of desired output is determined 60. If softcopy file output is desired, offline imposition is performed if applicable. Then, the softcopy file is saved to appropriate storage media (such as a firewire or USB portable computer hard drive) and the softcopy file can be delivered to a printing facility, for example, and printed 66. If direct printing is desired, the file is printed 61 and mail finishing operations are performed 68. In addition, files printed using the softcopy file output cache method are further processed by the mail finishing operations of step 68. After the mail finishing operations are performed, the presorted, finished mailpieces can be arranged into mail trays 72 and delivered to the post office 72 where the process ends 74.
Accordingly, several jobs for a printing run can be set up simultaneously, so that only one set up procedure is required for a run of several jobs. The process automatically merges the jobs, assembles the required ad copy, presorts the mailpieces, and calculates imposition to provide a print run that is presorted and ready to mail. For example, an individual recipient in a mail list merged according to the invention may be receiving mailpieces from three different senders. Using conventional printing techniques, three separate print runs with printing template changes between runs, and manual presorting after the run, would be required to take advantage of presorted mail discounts. Advantageously, by merging and presorting lists from several vendors, and the mailpieces from the three senders to the individual recipient may be printed sequentially by changing printing templates “on the fly” for each of the three mailpieces, thereby preserving the presort order and eliminated the need to have three separate print runs and post printing presorting. Accordingly, the mailpieces are sorted prior to the printing process so that no manual sorting is required before delivering the print job to the post office. As a result, discounted bulk mail rates can be used. By merging print jobs, smaller jobs having less than 200 presorted mailpieces, for example, (under current USPS rules, an amount too small to qualify for bulk mailing rates), can still take advantage of bulk mailing rates by being incorporated into a job having more that 200 total pieces.
In addition, the invention provides imposition so that print sequencing can be maintained. As an example, when a mailpiece is being printed as a single of 1-up positions, the print sequence order is the same as the mailing presort order. However, to maximize printing economies, mailpieces, especially small items such as postcards, are sometimes printed in impositioned format. For example, a postcard may be printed 4-up on letter-sized paper. Using the disclosed process, the print order is configured so that when printing is complete and the stack of printed sheets are cut into the 4 stacks of cards, each stack is already in mailing presort order and the total number of items on the mailing list is included.
The present invention can be embodied in the form of computer-implemented processes and apparatus for practicing those processes. The present invention can also be embodied in the form of computer program code containing computer-readable instructions embodied in tangible media, such as floppy diskettes, CD-ROMs, hard disks, or any other computer-readable storage medium, wherein, when the computer program code is loaded into and executed by a computer, the computer becomes an apparatus for practicing the invention. The present invention can also be embodied in the form of computer program code, for example, whether stored in a storage medium, loaded into and/or executed by a computer, or transmitted over some transmission medium, such as over electrical wiring or cabling, through fiber optics, or via electromagnetic radiation, wherein, when the computer program code is loaded into and executed by a computer, the computer becomes an apparatus for practicing the invention. When implemented on a general-purpose computer, the computer program code segments configure the computer to create specific logic circuits or processing modules.
While the preferred embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described herein, it will be obvious that such embodiments are provided by way of example only. Numerous variations, changes and substitutions will occur to those of skill in the art without departing from the invention herein. Accordingly, it is intended that the invention be limited only by the spirit and scope of the appended claims.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US4831554||Apr 10, 1986||May 16, 1989||Pitney Bowes Inc.||Postage meter message printing system|
|US5039075||Jul 12, 1989||Aug 13, 1991||R. R. Donnelley & Sons Company||Automatic document gathering and personalization system|
|US5819241||May 27, 1997||Oct 6, 1998||Reiter; Joshua J.||Interactive process for applying or printing information on letters or parcels|
|US6141654||Dec 30, 1998||Oct 31, 2000||Pitney Bowes Inc.||Postage printing system having subsidized printing of third party messages|
|US6154733||Dec 30, 1998||Nov 28, 2000||Pitney Bowes Inc.||Postage printing system having variable subsidies for printing of third party messages|
|US6173274||Dec 30, 1998||Jan 9, 2001||Pitney Bowes Inc.||Production mail system having subsidies for printing of third party messages on mailpieces|
|US6178411||Jul 10, 1998||Jan 23, 2001||Joshua J. Reiter||Interactive process for applying or printing information on letters or parcels|
|US6327580||Apr 17, 2000||Dec 4, 2001||Pitney Bowes Inc.||Postage printing system having variable subsidies for printing of third party messages|
|US6408286||Dec 30, 1998||Jun 18, 2002||Pitney Bowes Inc.||Postage printing system having a digital coupon distribution system|
|US6762384 *||Sep 25, 2000||Jul 13, 2004||Siemens Aktiengesellschaft||Method of presorting mail for minimized effort to sequence mail for delivery|
|US7133851 *||Aug 17, 2000||Nov 7, 2006||Donald B. Benson||System and method for combined mailing of a plurality of diverse publications|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US20060080266 *||Jun 30, 2005||Apr 13, 2006||Shahrom Kiani||Mailer detection and manifest system|
|U.S. Classification||358/1.13, 358/1.14|
|International Classification||G06F3/12, G06K15/00, G07B17/00|
|Cooperative Classification||G07B2017/00483, G07B17/00467|
|Feb 27, 2003||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: SMARTMIX TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, FLORIDA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:KELLEHER, DENIS KIERAN;KENT, BRADLEY D.;COHN, WARREN G.;REEL/FRAME:013834/0030;SIGNING DATES FROM 20030205 TO 20030206
|Feb 15, 2011||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|Jun 9, 2015||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 8