|Publication number||US7361439 B2|
|Application number||US 11/026,036|
|Publication date||Apr 22, 2008|
|Filing date||Jan 3, 2005|
|Priority date||Jan 3, 2005|
|Also published as||US20060147824|
|Publication number||026036, 11026036, US 7361439 B2, US 7361439B2, US-B2-7361439, US7361439 B2, US7361439B2|
|Inventors||Thomas M. Wilbert, Gary J. Maier, William G. Herbert|
|Original Assignee||Xerox Corporation|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (16), Referenced by (6), Classifications (12), Legal Events (4)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
Photoreceptors are used in printing/copying devices. In particular, the manufacture of a photoreceptor substrate with a more evenly distributed surface energy is described.
In xerography, or electrophotographic printing/copying, a charge-retentive device called a photoreceptor is electrostatically charged. For optimal image production, the photoreceptor should be uniformly charged across its entire surface. The photoreceptor may then be exposed to a light pattern of an input image to selectively discharge the surface of the photoreceptor in accordance with the image. The resulting pattern of charged and discharged areas on the photoreceptor forms an electrostatic charge pattern (i.e., a latent image) conforming to the input image. The latent image may be developed by contacting it with finely divided electrostatically attractable powder called toner. Toner may be held on the image areas by electrostatic force. The toner image may then be transferred to a substrate or support member (e.g., paper) and the image may then be affixed to the substrate or support member by a fusing process to form a permanent image thereon. After transfer, excess toner left on the photoreceptor may be cleaned from the photoreceptor surface and residual charge may be erased from the photoreceptor.
Electrophotographic photoreceptors may be provided in a number of forms. For example, a photoreceptor may be a homogeneous layer of a single material, such as vitreous selenium, or a photoreceptor may be a composite layer containing a photoconductive layer and another material. In addition, the photoreceptor may be multi-layered. Current layered photoreceptors generally have at least a flexible substrate support layer, or undercoat layer (UCL), and two active layers. These two active layers generally include a charge generating layer (CGL) containing a light absorbing material, and a charge transport layer (CTL) containing electron donor molecules. These layers may be in any order, and sometimes may be combined in a single or a mixed layer. The flexible substrate support layer may be formed of a conductive material. Alternatively, a conductive layer may be formed on top of a nonconductive flexible substrate support layer.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,958,638 to Katayama, et al. discloses exemplary known materials used for undercoat layers. For example, such materials may include a resin material alone, such as polyethylene, polypropylene, polystyrene, acrylic resin, vinyl chloride resin, vinyl acetate resin, polyurethane, epoxy resin, polyester, melamine resin, silicone resin, polyvinyl butyryl, polyamide and copolymers containing two or more of repeated units of these resins. The resin materials may further include casein, gelatin, polyvinyl alcohol, ethyl cellulose, etc. The undercoat layers are typically formed by a dip coating method. See, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,958,638 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,891,594 to Yuh, et al. In an exemplary dip coating process, a cylindrical drum may be dipped into a tank of coating material and then withdrawn, with a portion of the coating material adhering to the drum. The adhered coating material is then allowed to cure.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,331,371 to Matsui describes an electrophotographic photoreceptor that has a conductive support and a photoconductive layer laminated on the conductive support. A described exemplary conductive support is made of aluminum or aluminum based alloy, and the maximum height of the surface roughness of the conductive support is 0.8 μm or more and 2.0 μm or less. Further, the reflectivity of light incident upon the surface of the conductive support is equal to or less than 35% of a quantity of exposure light from a coherent light. The described photoreceptor produces a quantity of reflected lights in response to a coherent light and thereby suppresses a quantity of interference lights produced by the reflected lights and reflected lights from or incident lights on the photoconductive layer. In this manner the photoreceptor prevents generation of interference fringe patterns upon printed output.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,051,148 to Perry et al. describes a method of fabricating a multi-layered photoreceptor in which a photoreceptor substrate having a metal surface is etched with an etching solution and a metal oxide layer is formed on the metal surface with the etching solution. The etching and oxidation layer creates a roughened substrate surface that scatters rather than reflects light. This light scatter effect reduces interference patterns caused by reflected beams of coherent light reflected from each of the respective interfaces between layers in the multi-layered photoreceptor.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,997,722 to Vidal et al. describes an aqueous cleaning method for a photoreceptor that includes analyzing the finished substrate surface by performing a first surface energy reading, a first ellipsometry reading, a first x-ray diffraction reading, and a first profilometry reading, removing electrochemically via an alternating voltage or alternating current a portion of the finished substrate surface, thereby resulting in a cleaned substrate surface, analyzing the cleaned substrate surface by performing a second surface energy reading, a second ellipsometry reading, a second x-ray diffraction reading, and a second profilometry reading, in which the removing step is accomplished to the extent that the second surface energy reading and the second ellipsometry reading are measurably changed from the first surface energy reading and the first ellipsometry reading, but the second x-ray diffraction reading and the second profilometry reading are measurably unchanged from the first x-ray diffraction reading and the first profilometry reading; and depositing a layer of the photoreceptor on the cleaned substrate surface.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,635,324 to Rasmussen et al. describes a method for eliminating interference between the photoreceptor substrate and the undercoat layer interface, the substrate is formed to include a surface texture that is optimal for enabling continuous coating of thin-film forming undercoat layer materials such as organometallic or organometallic chelate compounds with a silane having a dried coated thickness between approximately 0.05-0.5 μm and preferably between 0.08-0.12 μm. In order for the substrate to accommodate a thin layer of such undercoat materials, the substrate of the photoreceptor is designed to have a specific surface roughness.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,381,213 to Michlin describes an adapter that allows a lathe to turn photoreceptor substrate drums, charge rollers and developer brushes of printers, copiers, and facsimile machines. A unitary component adapts the drum so it may be held on the lathe and drives the object. The adapting portion includes a flexible material such as a hose or o-ring to snugly receive the end extension of the drum, roller or brush. The drive portion connects with the drive bolt of the lathe and spins the object.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,346,556 to Perry et al. describes a method of cleaning a substrate that includes: lathing a substrate surface with a cutting fluid composition containing an antioxidant, a surfactant, a lubricant, and water; rinsing the lathed substrate surface with high quality deionized water having a resistivity of at least 2 M ohm-cm; immersing the rinsed lathed substrate surface in a bath of high quality deionized water having a resistivity of at least 2 M ohm-cm; and removing the substrate from the bath of deionized water at a rate low enough to prevent water droplets from forming on the substrate.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,309,200 to Michlin describes a set of adapter units which allow a powerful, variable speed lathe to turn photoreceptor drums, charge rollers and developer brushes of printers, copiers, and facsimile machines. In one embodiment, adapter units fit over the cylindrical extensions on the ends of the drum. Two pieces of opposing tail stock support and hold the drum on the lathe by applying pressure against the adapter units. A drive bushing is attached to and rotates with the drive bolt of the lathe.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,228,369 to Itoh et al. describes a method for machining a substrate surface of a photoreceptor by the use of a cutting machine which supplies cutting lubricant from a reservoir to a cutting tool of the cutting machine, the method comprises a measurement of the cutting tool temperature by a sensor and a control of both the temperature of cutting lubricant and a flow rate thereof. The control is responsive to the cutting tool temperature and suppresses a temperature fluctuation of the cutting tool.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,170,683 to Kawada et al. describes a method of surface-processing a photoreceptor base including aluminum material for electrophotography on a lathe. A surface of the a photoreceptor base is cut by a cutting tool having a polycrystalline diamond body while cutting fluid, composed of water, an aqueous solution of a surface-active agent or an aqueous solution of a water-soluble organic solvent, is supplied to the surface of the photoreceptor base.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,003,851 to Kawada et al. describes a method of manufacturing a photoreceptor base drum by a lathe-turning machine in which a cutting tool is brought in contact with a surface of the base drum and travels in the axial direction to finish the surface of the base drum into a mirror-like surface. A main cutting edge formed by a rake surface and a front flank surface on the cutting tool is shaped as a curved surface with a radius of curvature of 0.15 to 3.5 μm, and the rake surface and the front flank surface are shaped to smoothly continue to the curved surface of the main cutting edge.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,919,594 to Perry et al. and U.S. Pat. No. 5,573,445 to Rasmussen et al. describe methods of roughening a photoreceptor substrate by spraying a honing composition including a particulate matter against a photoreceptor substrate to create a predetermined surface roughness.
All of the references indicated above are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety for their teachings.
In the fabrication of a multi-layered electrophotographic photoreceptor, a photoreceptor aluminum alloy substrate is prepared with specific roughness characteristics and an oxidation layer resulting in a photoreceptor substrate with a more evenly distributed surface energy. By creating a photoreceptor substrate with a more evenly distributed surface energy, axial streaks (referred to as Tiger Stripe and/or Tiger Tail defects ) that typically occur in an undercoat layer (UCL) subsequently applied to the photoreceptor substrate may be eliminated, or greatly reduced.
In accordance with one exemplary process, a photoreceptor aluminum alloy substrate, or drum, is placed in a lathe and turned using a polycrystalline diamond cutting tool. The resulting turned photoreceptor substrate has a surface that may be characterized by a roughness profile in which Ra is between 0.060 μm and 0.400 μm (preferably between 0.080 μm and 0.200 μm), Rt (0.100) is a minimum of 100 counts, but preferably 200-500 counts or greater, Rt (0.400) is less than 150 counts, but preferably zero counts, and Rmax is not greater than 4.0 μm but preferably less than 1.0 μm.
Such roughness profile characteristics may be determined for an evaluation length (e.g., 0.8 mm) measured across the photoreceptor substrate surface in an axial direction. Ra is the arithmetic average of all departures of the roughness profile from a center line within the evaluation length. Rmax represents the largest single roughness gap within the evaluation length. Rt (0.100) is a count of peak to valley distances that are at least 0.100 μm. Rt (0.400) is a count of peak to valley distances that are at least 0.400 μm.
In such an exemplary photoreceptor substrate, if the Rmax is greater than 2.0 μm, circumferential lines may show during print tests using the finished photoreceptor. Also, if the Rt (0.100) count is less than 100, there may be little reduction in the number and severity of observed axial streaks.
Using the described approach, a specific surface roughness may be achieved upon a photoreceptor substrate surface without the need to wet hone the surface of the photoreceptor drum as described above with respect to U.S. Pat. No. 5,919,594 to Perry et al. and U.S. Pat. No. 5,573,445 to Rasmussen et al. Thus, one of the many advantages is the elimination of the need for wet honing, which may significantly reduce the complexity and cost of fabricating multi-layered electrophotographic photoreceptors.
Fabrication of an exemplary multi-layered electrophotographic photoreceptor may begin with an aluminum alloy drum that is approximately 340 mm in length with a diameter of 30 mm. The first layer, an undercoat layer (UCL) used as an electrical and blocking layer, may be applied using dip coating technology. A “three-component” UCL containing polyvinyl butyral (6 weight percent), zirconium acety acetonate (83 weight percent) and gamma-aminopropyl triethoxy silane (11 weight percent) may be mixed, in the order listed, with n-butyl alcohol in 60:40 (by volume) solvent to solute weight ratio for the UCL. The UCL may be applied in a thickness of approximately 0.05 to 2.0 μm (preferably 0.05 to 1.0) to the aluminum alloy drum substrate by dip coating. The substrate may next coated with about 0.2 μm thick charge generating layer (CGL) of hydroxygallium phthalocyanine (OHGaPC) and a terpolymer VMCH available from Union Carbide of: vinyl chloride (83 weight percent), vinyl acetate (16 weight percent) and maleic anhydride (1 weight percent), dissolved in n-butyl acetate (4.5 weight percent solids) in a 60:40 weight ratio (60 OHGaPC: 40 VMCH). The CGL may be subsequently coated with a 24 μm thick (after drying) charge transport layer (CTL) of polycarbonate derived from bis phenyl Z (PCZ, available from Mitsubishi Chemicals) and N,N′-diphenyl-N,N′-bis(3-methylphenyl)-(1,1′-biphenyl)-4,4′ diamine dissolved in tetrahydrofuran.
After producing an electrophotographic photoreceptor as described above, defects have been identified in the dried surface of the three-component UCL applied to the photoreceptor substrate. This defect may include a characteristic light diffraction pattern around the top of the UCL coating, similar in appearance to the stripes on the back of a tiger (Tiger Stripes) that would often droop down the surface of the photoreceptor substrate (Tiger Tails) as a streak in the UCL coating. A typical photoreceptor device produced as described above may include several of these streaks (often more than eight). These defects were most likely to occur in the coating positions where the solvent vapor above the dip tank was the highest. The presence of such solvent vapors may retard solvent flash off and drying, thus, promoting and prolonging the mobility of the UCL coating.
Print tests using the resulting photoreceptor devices produce printed output that includes objectionable streaks that match the, so called, Tiger Tails in the photoreceptor undercoat layer. Optimization of the coating process (e.g., improved ventilation of solvent vapors above the dip tanks, etc.) succeeded in reducing the severity of the Tiger Stripe and Tiger Tail defects, however, rejection rates due to the presence of Tiger Tails in finished photoreceptor device remained unacceptably high.
Analysis of the Tiger Stripe and Tiger Tail problem determined that the defects are caused by uneven surface energy present upon the surface of the photoreceptor substrate. The processes used to prepare the raw aluminum alloy tube to become a photoreceptor UCL substrate produces streaks of aluminum alloy with differing average grain size and orientation. These streaks run in the axial direction and may be easily seen after etching the raw tube or etching the lathed tube. For example, these streaks may occur in numbers exceeding thirty on a 30 mm diameter photoreceptor substrate. While the, so called, weld lines (four on a typical aluminum alloy photoreceptor substrate) are counted as part of this number of streaks, the total number of streaks exceed the number of weld lines by a factor of about ten.
Each of the surface energy streaks upon the surface of a photoreceptor substrate may have a unique surface energy. Measurements using a standard water droplet technique reveal that the energy difference may be considerable (tens of dynes per centimeter) between the streaks. Further, the boundaries between these streaks are well defined when the tube is mirror lathed.
A solution wets a surface when the surface has a higher surface energy than the solution because the higher energy surface literally pulls the lower surface energy solution over the surface. When the situation is reversed, the higher surface energy liquid will tend to form droplets on a lower surface energy surface. Three component UCL, as described above, has a relatively low surface energy, thus, the three component UCL has a strong propensity to wet the photoreceptor substrate.
However, if the photoreceptor substrate has bands of surface energies with well-defined borders, the three component UCL may be disproportionately pulled toward the substrate areas with higher surface energy. This disproportionate pull may cause some areas of the substrate to have a thinner layer of UCL next to areas with thicker UCL. This is especially the case when areas of higher surface energy flank an area of relatively low surface energy. When the flash-off time and the drying time are extended, there will be more time for this movement, thus, thinning to occur. When this thinning is sufficient, print defects will result.
Investigation of the problem further revealed that changing the roughness of the aluminum alloy substrate surface and forming an oxide layer on the roughened substrate surface mitigated the propensity of Tiger Stripe and Tiger Tail defects. A roughened surface and an oxide layer blur the borders between the higher and lower surface energy areas, thus, mitigating the severity of the differences in surface energy. Additionally, extra oxide thickness may be obtained on some substrate surfaces without extraordinary means because of an increased surface energy of the substrate surface resulting from the mechanical working associated with the roughening of the substrate surface. For example, a honed substrate demonstrates very little propensity to form Tiger Stripes and no propensity to form Tiger Tails. However, the honing process introduces a considerable amount of energy to the surface of the substrate and this energy promotes the formation of the oxide layer.
Substrate surfaces that are lathed with progressively rougher surfaces experience a similar drop in the propensity to form these defects. This reduction is directly proportional to how closely the lathed surface characteristics emulated a honed surface. Further, it was noted that a rough lathed surface produced using a composite diamond having surface roughness characteristicsin the range of a typical honed surface behaved very much like a honed surface regarding these “Tiger” defects. A honed-like rough lathed surface used in a manner that does not allow the growth of an oxide layer may display a propensity to form Tiger Tails. However, removing the cutting fluid/coolant from this rough lathed surface and subsequently letting it rest at normal ambient conditions, thus allowing an oxide layer to form on the surface of the rough lathed surface, resulted in a rough lathed tube that performs in a manner that is substantially identical to a honed surface. That is, the surface roughness characteristics described above may not be sufficient to eliminate these “Tiger” defects. However, the specified roughness characteristics plus an oxidation layer is sufficient to eliminate the “Tiger” defects.
When substrates having varying levels of surface roughness were exposed to conditions that would increase the thickness of the oxide, a further reduction in “Tiger” type defects is observed. The conditions used to increase the oxide thickness may include, one hour at 140° C. in an oven, anodizing (0° C. in 30% H2SO4 for 15 min. @ 24V, 16V, & 12V and 15° C. in 1% Citric Acid for 15 min. @ 12V & 16V) and one hour in an oven at 140° C. with an increased O2 (50% versus 20% normally present in air). Some level of oxide thickness may be sufficient to eliminate these “Tiger” defects but process that use conditions where the oxide forms naturally (e.g., allowing the roughened substrate to rest at ambient temperature) are preferred due to the greater simplicity associated with the process.
Based upon this analysis it has been determined that by preparing a photoreceptor substrate with specific roughness characteristics and an oxide layer, as described above, Tiger Stripe and Tiger Tail defects may be greatly reduced or eliminated. However, no single roughness parameter is sufficient to fully specify the surface roughness required. In addition, although the oxide layer covers substantially 100% of the roughened substrate surface, geometric leveling of the oxide layer upon the roughened substrate surface may lead to slight variances in the thickness of the oxide layer at specific points on the substrate surface. Further, all traces of Tiger Stripe and/or Tiger Tail defects do not need to be eliminated because less prominent “Tiger” defects do not affect the operational printing characteristics of the resulting photoreceptor device. For example, Tiger Tails, as described above, typically affect the operational printing characteristics of the photoreceptor, but Tiger Stripes may not.
The process described below teaches how to obtain a surface that will not form offending Tiger Tail defects despite use of a photoreceptor aluminum alloy substrate that has areas with surface energy differences. For example, in accordance with one exemplary process, a photoreceptor aluminum alloy substrate surface may be placed in a lathe and turned using a polycrystalline cutting tool. Typically, the substrate is cylindrical or drum-shaped, and may be cleaned by any suitable technique prior to and after lathing to remove any foreign substances introduced to the surface during any of the aforementioned rough manufacturing processes. The resulting turned photoreceptor substrate preferably has a surface that may be characterized by a rougluless profile in which Ra is between 0.060 μm and 0.400 μm (preferably between 0.080 μm and 0.200 μm), Rt (0.100) is a minimum of 100 counts, but preferably 200-500 counts or greater, Rt (0.400) is less than 150 counts, but preferably zero counts, and Rmax is not greater than 4.0 μm but preferably less than 1.0 μm. If the Rmax is too high circumferential lines may show during print testing. Also, if the Rt (0.100) counts are too low there is no effect on the axial streaks.
Such roughness profile characteristics may be determined for an evaluation length (e.g., 0.8 mm) measured across the photoreceptor substrate surface in an axial direction.
Ra is the arithmetic average of all departures of the roughness profile from the center line within a sample length (e.g., 0.8 mm). Ra is defined by a formula:
in which lm represents the evaluation length, and |y| represents the absolute value of departures of the roughness profile from the center line. That is, Ra is the arithmetic average of all departures of the roughness profile from a center line within the evaluation length. The expression Rmax represents the largest single roughness gap within the evaluation length. Rt (0.100) is a count of peak to valley distances that are at least 0.100 μm. Rt (0.400) is a count of peak to valley distances that are at least 0.400 μm.
Significant suppression of operational effect of Tiger Stripes and Tiger Tail defects may be observed in embodiments of the present invention in which the finished photoreceptor is used within a copying/printing device that uses conventionally used light source wavelengths, including a light source having a wavelength at 780 nm. For example, the photoreceptor device produced according to the invention may be tested for print quality assessment in a Xerox Document Centre 230 (a multifunction laser printing machine) at an initial charging voltage of about 480 volts. The Document Center 230 has a 780 nm wavelength laser diode as the exposure source and a single component discharged area development (DAD) system with 7 μm toner. Interference fringe effect is tested in a gray scale print mode using specified halftone patterns. Distortions in printed output are not observed with photoreceptors that include a UCL substrate with the identified roughness characteristics and oxidation layer. Similar results may be achieved with other laser-based machines, e.g., those with an exposure light source that operates in the range of 600-800 nm.
All measurements of the various surface roughness parameters described herein may be made with a profilameter such as Perthen Model S3P or Model S8P manufactured by Mahr Feinpruef Corporation. Generally, a stylus with a diamond tip is traversed over the surface of the roughened substrate at a constant speed to obtain all data points within an evaluation length of 0.8 mm. The radius of the stylus used to obtain all data referred to herein is 2.5 μm.
An exemplary photoreceptor aluminum alloy substrate, or drum, may be an aluminum tube, approximately 1 mm thick, produced by a drawing method or extrusion method, and cut to a prescribed length (for example 340 mm). The photoreceptor drum may be turned in a lathe in any manner, (e.g., as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,003,851, described above). Further, the photoreceptor drum may be securely within the lathe may include use of lathe adapters, as described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,381,213 or U.S. Pat. No. and 5,346,556, described above. Still further, any of the techniques taught in any of the U.S. patent applications incorporated by reference, above, may be used to facilitate the process described here to obtain a photoreceptor substrate with the roughness characteristics and oxidation layer, as described above.
A lathe cutting tool with a polycrystalline diamond cutting tip may be used to apply the desired roughness characteristics to a photoreceptor substrate surface. One commercially available polycrystalline diamond material suitable for use in such a lathe tool cutting tip is manufactured by K&Y Diamond Ltd., with offices located in St-Laurent, Qc, Canada and Mooers, N.Y., U.S.A. Several polycrystalline diamond materials are available from K&Y Diamond Ltd., each identified as coarse, medium and fine, respectively. The K&Y polycrystalline diamond material found most suitable for use in applying the desired roughness characteristics is marketed as K&Y's “fine” grade polycrystalline diamond material. The polycrystalline diamond material includes a fine grade polycrystalline diamond powder held together by a strong bonding agent.
As shown in
As shown in
The overall width 212 (See
A photoreceptor substrate may be produced using a lathing process based on the following conditions. For example, the surface of a substrate may be turned by a polycrystalline diamond cutting tool, as described above. The substrate surface may be supplied with a suitable cutting liquid during the lathing process to facilitate cutting and to control surface temperatures of the cutting tool and the substrate surface. Then, the substrate may be cleaned, dried, and allowed to sit at ambient temperature to form an oxidation layer over the roughened surface. Thus, a roughened, oxidized substrate may be obtained for use within a electrophotographic photoreceptor.
(1) Substrate—As a substrate made of an aluminum alloy material, the rotary-drum-shaped substrate made of standard, commercially available 6063 Aluminum allow. For example, the 6063 aluminum alloy substrate may contain, in addition to aluminum, 0.45-0.9% by weight of magnesium, 0.2-0.6% by weight of silicon, 0.35% by weight of iron, 0.1% by weight of titanium, 0.1% by weight of zinc and 0.1% by weight or less of manganese. The rotary-drum-shaped substrate may have any outside diameter and any length. For example, one exemplary photoreceptor aluminum drum substrate may have a diameter of approximately 30 mm and a length of 240 mm. The described surface roughening technique, however, may be applied to a substrate of any diameter and any length.
(2) Cutting Liquid—Any kerosene based or aqueous based cutting solution may be used that is compatible with aluminum.
(3) Rotational Speed—The process described here is compatible with any commercially available lathe. Any lathe rotational speed may be used so long as the linear feed rate of the substrate in relation to the rotational speed of lathe results in a linear feed rate of between 0.002 inches and 0.010 inches per complete revolution of the substrate. Preferably the feed rate relative to the rotational speed of the substrate is .0045 inches per complete revolution of the substrate.
(4) Cutting Tool—A cutting tool that is made of polycrystalline diamond as desribed above with respect to
(5) Depth of Cut—The depth of cut may vary from a slight skim cut to a more substantial cut. For example, the depth of cut may vary from .005 mm to 0.3048 mm. However, a depth of cut of 0.0254 mm is preferred.
(6) Orientation of Cutting Tool—In preparation for the lathing process, the polycrystalline diamond tip lathe tool is positioned in the lathe such that the cutting edge 110 is facing the rotating surface of the aluminum drum substrate. With reference to
The lathe tool is positioned, as described above, such that cutting edge 110 is opposite, and aligned in parallel with, the outermost point (or centerline) of the aluminum substrate drum. Once positioned in such a manner, the lathe tool is rotated about axis 104 (See
Please note that by orienting the lathe tool with negative shear, as described above, lath tool cutting edge tip 112 and non-cutting edge 114 do not come into contact with the aluminum substrate. All cutting is performed by cutting edge 110.
Using a polycrystalline diamond-tipped lathe tool, as described above, in the manner described above, multiple electrophotographic photoreceptor substrates were lathed on each of eleven different lathes and subjected to surface and operational printing tests, as described above.
Please note that the counts in
Once a photoreceptor substrate is processed to include the surface roughness and oxidation characteristics described above, a photosensitive imaging member may be fabricated upon the prepared substrate. Any suitable technique may be utilized to apply the charge generating material (CGL) and a charge transport material (CTL) onto the substrate surface either in a laminate type configuration or in a single layer configuration. Typical application techniques include spraying, dip coating, roll coating, wire wound rod coating, and the like. Dip coating is a preferred coating technique where the dipping and raising motions of the substrate relative to the coating solution may be accomplished at any suitable speed. Drying of the deposited coating may be effected by any suitable conventional technique such as oven drying, infra-red radiation drying, air drying and the like. Generally, the thickness of the charge generating layer may range from about 0.1 μm to about 3 μm and the thickness of the transport layer may range between about 5 μm to about 100 μm, but thicknesses outside these ranges may also be used. In general, the ratio of the thickness of the charge transport layer to the charge generating layer is preferably maintained from about 2:1 to 200:1 and in some instances as great as 400:1.
A charge generating layer (CGL) and a charge transport layer (CTL) may be deposited onto the substrate surface either in a laminate type configuration where the CGL and CTL are in different layers or in a single layer configuration where the CGL and CTL are in the same layer along with a binder resin. When applied as different layers, the CTL in a charge transport layer may be applied to the substrate surface prior to or subsequent to application of the CGL in a charge generating layer. Typical organic photoconductive charge generating materials include, for example, azo pigments such as Sudan Red, Dian Blue, Janus Green B, and the like; quinone pigments such as Algol Yellow, Pyrene Quinone, Indanthrene Brilliant Violet RRP, and the like; quinocyanine pigments; perylene pigments; indigo pigments such as indigo, thioindigo, and the like; bisbenzoimidazole pigments such as Indofast Orange toner, and the like; phthalocyanine pigments such as copper phthalocyanine, aluminochloro-phthalocyanine, titanyl phthalocyanine, hydroxy gallium phthalocyanine and the like; quinacridone pigments; or azulene compounds. Typical inorganic photoconductive charge generating materials include, for example, cadmium sulfide, cadmium sulfoselenide, cadmium selenide, crystalline and selenium, lead oxide and other chalcogenides.
Any suitable inactive resin binder material may be employed in the charge generating layer. Typical organic resinous binders include polycarbonates, acrylate polymers, methacrylate polymers, vinyl polymers, cellulose polymers, polyesters, polysiloxanes, polyamides, polyurethanes, epoxies, polyvinylacetals, and the like.
Any suitable charge transport material may be used. Typical charge transport materials include, for example, organic polymer or non-polymeric material capable of supporting the injection of photoexcited holes or transporting electrons from the photoconductive material and allowing the transport of these holes or electrons through the organic layer to selectively dissipate a surface charge. Typical charge transport materials include, for example, a positive hole transporting material selected from compounds having in the main chain or the side chain a polycyclic aromatic ring such as anthracene, pyrene, phenanthrene, coronene, and the like, or a nitrogen-containing hetero ring such as indole, carbazole, oxazole, isoxazole, thiazole, imidazole, pyrazole, oxadiazole, pyrazoline, thiadiazole, triazole, hydrazone compounds, and the like. Other typical transport materials include electron donor materials, such as carbazole; N-ethyl carbazole; N-isopropyl carbazole; N-phenyl carbazole; tetraphenylpyrene; 1-methyl pyrene; perylene; chrysene; anthracene; tetraphene; 2-phenyl naphthalene; azopyrene; 1-ethyl pyrene; acetyl pyrene; 2,3-benzochrysene; 2,4-benzopyrene; 1,4-bromopyrene; poly(N-vinylcarbazole); poly(vinylpyrene); poly(vinyltetraphene); poly(vinyltetracene), poly(vinylperylene), and the like. Typical electron transport materials include, for example, electron acceptors such as 2,4,7-trinitro-9-fluorenone; 2,4,5,7-tetranitro-fluorenone; dinitroanthracene; dinitroacridene; tetracyanopyrene, dinitroanthraquinone, and the like.
Any suitable inactive resin binder may be employed in the charge transport layer. Typical inactive resin binders soluble in methylene chloride include polycarbonate resin, polyvinylcarbazole, polyester, polyarylate, polystyrene, polyacrylate, polyether, polysulfone, and the like. Weight average molecular weights may vary, for example, from about 20,000 to about 1,500,000.
Any suitable substrate may be treated including metal substrates typically employed as photoreceptor substrates such as those fabricated from for example stainless steel, nickel, aluminum, and alloys thereof. However, aluminum or aluminum alloy substrates are preferred. Typical aluminum alloys include, for example, 1050, 1100, 3003, 6061, 6063, and the like. Alloy 3003 contains Al, 0.12 percent by weight Si, 0.43 percent by weight Fe, 0.14 percent by weight Cu, 1.04 percent by weight Mn, 0.01 percent by weight Mg, 0.01 percent by weight Zn, 0.01 percent by weight Ti, and a trace amount of Cr. The size and distribution of inclusions and intermetallic compounds in the alloy should be below the level at which the inclusions and intermetallic particles would pose a problem for the lathing process. Patches of non-uniform surface texture may result if many large inclusions or intermetallics are present. Similarly, the ductility properties of the aluminum substrate should be substantially uniform to ensure a uniform texture upon completion of the lathing process. Generally, the surface of the substrate may be relatively smooth prior to lathing. Sufficiently smooth surfaces may be formed by, e.g., rough lathing, specialized extrusion and drawing processes, grinding, buffing and the like.
The detailed description has been provided with reference to preferred embodiments thereof, which are intended to be illustrative, not limiting. Various changes may be made and may be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the following claims.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US4800144 *||Nov 3, 1987||Jan 24, 1989||Minolta Camera Kabushiki Kaisha||Laminated type photosensitive member for electrophotography comprising a substrate of aluminate|
|US5003851||Oct 18, 1989||Apr 2, 1991||Konica Corporation||Method of manufacturing a photoreceptor|
|US5170683||Dec 16, 1991||Dec 15, 1992||Konica Corporation||Method for surface-processing of a photoreceptor base for electrophotography|
|US5228369||Dec 9, 1991||Jul 20, 1993||Konica Corporation||Method of surface machining for substrate of electrophotographic photoreceptor|
|US5309200||Sep 11, 1992||May 3, 1994||Michlin Steven B||Photoreceptor drum, charge roller and developer brush spinner device|
|US5346556||Nov 1, 1993||Sep 13, 1994||Xerox Corporation||Lathing and cleaning process for photoreceptor substrates|
|US5381213||Aug 3, 1993||Jan 10, 1995||Michlin; Steven B.||Photoreceptor drum, charge roller and developer brush spinner device|
|US5573445||Aug 31, 1994||Nov 12, 1996||Xerox Corporation||Liquid honing process and composition for interference fringe suppression in photosensitive imaging members|
|US5635324||Mar 20, 1995||Jun 3, 1997||Xerox Corporation||Multilayered photoreceptor using a roughened substrate and method for fabricating same|
|US5891594||Jan 13, 1997||Apr 6, 1999||Xerox Corporation||Process for preparing electrophotographic imaging member with perylene-containing charge-generating material and n-butylacetate|
|US5919594||May 26, 1998||Jul 6, 1999||Xerox Corporation||Substrate honing method|
|US5958638||Jun 18, 1998||Sep 28, 1999||Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha||Electrophotographic photoconductor and method of producing same|
|US5997722||Jun 24, 1998||Dec 7, 1999||Xerox Corporation||Electrochemical surface treatment|
|US6051148||Mar 5, 1998||Apr 18, 2000||Xerox Corporation||Photoreceptor fabrication method|
|US6331371||Aug 19, 1999||Dec 18, 2001||Nec Corporation||Electrophotographic photoreceptor and its manufacturing method|
|US20040053151 *||Jul 28, 2003||Mar 18, 2004||Masaki Hashimoto||Electrophotographic photoreceptor and method for producing the same|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US7648314 *||May 25, 2006||Jan 19, 2010||Sandvik Intellectual Property Ab||Method for manufacturing a cutting pick and the resulting pick|
|US7673785 *||Nov 21, 2007||Mar 9, 2010||Sandvik Intellectual Property Ab||Method for manufacturing a cutting pick and the resulting pick|
|US8669031 *||Jun 2, 2011||Mar 11, 2014||Konica Minolta Business Technologies, Inc.||Electrophotographic photoreceptor and image forming method|
|US20060272790 *||May 25, 2006||Dec 7, 2006||Sandvik Intellectual Property Ab||Method for manufacturing a cutting pick and the resulting pick|
|US20080073412 *||Nov 21, 2007||Mar 27, 2008||Sandvik Intellectual Property Ab||Method for manufacturing a cutting pick and the resulting pick|
|US20110311907 *||Jun 2, 2011||Dec 22, 2011||Konica Minolta Business Technologies, Inc.||Electrophotographic photoreceptor and image forming method|
|U.S. Classification||430/65, 430/69, 430/131|
|Cooperative Classification||G03G5/144, G03G5/102, G03G5/142, G03G5/104|
|European Classification||G03G5/14B, G03G5/10C, G03G5/14B2, G03G5/10B|
|Jan 3, 2005||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: XEROX CORPORATION, CONNECTICUT
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:WILBERT, THOMAS M.;MAIER, GARY J.;HERBERT, WILLIAM G.;REEL/FRAME:016146/0307;SIGNING DATES FROM 20041216 TO 20041217
|Jun 30, 2005||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, TEXAS
Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:XEROX CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:016761/0158
Effective date: 20030625
Owner name: JP MORGAN CHASE BANK,TEXAS
Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:XEROX CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:016761/0158
Effective date: 20030625
|Aug 12, 2011||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|Sep 16, 2015||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 8