|Publication number||US7374302 B2|
|Application number||US 10/537,898|
|Publication date||May 20, 2008|
|Filing date||Dec 18, 2003|
|Priority date||Dec 23, 2002|
|Also published as||EP1576408A1, US20060103956, WO2004057407A1|
|Publication number||10537898, 537898, PCT/2003/5555, PCT/GB/2003/005555, PCT/GB/2003/05555, PCT/GB/3/005555, PCT/GB/3/05555, PCT/GB2003/005555, PCT/GB2003/05555, PCT/GB2003005555, PCT/GB200305555, PCT/GB3/005555, PCT/GB3/05555, PCT/GB3005555, PCT/GB305555, US 7374302 B2, US 7374302B2, US-B2-7374302, US7374302 B2, US7374302B2|
|Inventors||Michael S Griffith, Nicholas J Archer, Leslie C Laycock|
|Original Assignee||Bae Systems Plc|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (18), Non-Patent Citations (5), Referenced by (13), Classifications (10), Legal Events (2)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
This application is the U.S. national phase of international application PCT/GB2003/005555, filed 18 Dec. 2003, which designated the U.S. and claims priority of GB 0230038.2, filed 23 Dec. 2002, and GB 0309976.9, filed 30 Apr. 2003, the entire contents of each of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
This invention relates to a deformable mirror. In particular, this invention relates to a hybrid deformable mirror and is particularly well-suited to large deformable mirrors that may be used in applications such as astronomical telescopes and high resolution imaging.
Deformable mirrors are often used in the field of adaptive optics. For example, phase distortions in a signal may be sensed by a wavefront sensor and these distortions may be corrected for by deforming an adaptive mirror. Such adaptive mirrors may be employed in numerous fields, including:
Phase distortions can be corrected conveniently by reducing the distortions into characteristic Zernike modes. Zernike created a polynomial power series that provides a mathematically convenient way to describe the phase of an optical beam. Each term of the expansion includes a coefficient multiplied by a mathematical expression which represents a potential form of aberration, e.g. focus, coma or astigmatism. Increasing terms or modes are increasingly complex. For example, the first two Zernike modes are associated with tip-tilt. These modes can be filtered off and processed to provide the control signals for a separate tip-tilt mirror. The third Zernike mode often relates to focus. The focus and other higher order modes can then be processed to provide control signals for the deformable mirror.
To date, deformable mirrors use one or other of two alternative deformation mechanisms. The first is a class of mirrors called zonal mirrors. This class of mirrors is based on a number of discrete piezoelectric actuators attached directly to a deformable mirror. Each actuator in a zonal mirror can be used to deform an area of the mirror directly above it.
The second is a class of mirrors that generally comprise a substrate bonded to an active element. The active element is controlled such that the mirror is made to deform to adopt a desired shape, for example a convex shape, and this in turn causes the substrate to bend to the same shape. The active element is usually a piezoelectric material bonded to a substrate using an epoxy resin. The mirror can either have a single layer of piezoelectric material bonded to the substrate (strictly speaking a unimorph), or can be a dual piezoelectric layer with the two pieces poled in opposite directions (this is a true bimorph).
For smaller mirrors, bonded piezoelectric elements (e.g bimorph deformable mirrors) are preferred due to their relatively low cost. Such mirrors provide an adequate balance between bandwidth and stroke. However, the balance between bandwidth and stroke is especially important when looking to make larger mirrors e.g. mirrors with active apertures greater than 10 to 15 cms. In order to keep the resonant frequency and thus the bandwidth of the mirror constant, the thickness of the substrate must also increase. For the larger mirrors this will adversely affect the minimum curvature available from the mirror. For this reason, larger mirrors have historically been zonal mirrors. The fact that the substrate is supported by a large number of actuators means that the resonant frequency, and therefore bandwidth, is no longer directly linked to the mirror diameter. However, the overriding issue with this type of deformable mirror is the cost. Although there are a number of different actuator technologies available, none of them are cheap. This makes large mirrors expensive because as many as 300 actuators may be required. For a bonded piezoelectric element mirror, although a large peizoelectric element will be more expensive than a smaller one, the cost differential will not be as great. A second issue is that it is not always possible to place discrete actuators as close to each other as required because of their fairly large size.
Against this background, and from a first aspect, the present invention resides in a deformable mirror comprising: a passive substrate layer having a reflective surface provided thereon; a first layer of actively deformable material, attached to the passive substrate layer, that is operable to deform the mirror as a result of transverse expansion or contraction of the material under the influence of a field applied across its thickness; and an actuator coupled to one of said layers that is operable to further deform the mirror. The actuator can be used to provide the basic deformation required of the mirror (e.g. focus), while the deformable material can be used to provide fine tuning of the mirror shape. In this arrangement, the substrate no longer needs to be supported from the edge and so the resonance frequency and bandwidth is increased over and above what it would be for a purely edge-supported device. This means it is possible to concentrate on optimising the design of the deformable material to give the maximum curvature with less constraint from the resonance effects.
Preferably, the deformable mirror comprises a plurality of actuators that support the substrate. Optionally, the actuators are arranged to be operable to correct lower order Zernike modes. Preferably, the layer of deformable material is segmented, the segments being arranged to be operable to correct higher order Zernike modes. Optionally, the deformable material comprises peizoelectric material. Preferably, the actuator comprises magnetostrictive or electrostrictive material.
From a second aspect, the invention resides in a method of correcting phase variations in a beam of electromagnetic radiation incident upon a deformable mirror described above, wherein the actuator or actuators are moved to correct Zernike modes at or below a threshold order and the first and/or second layer or layers of actively deformable material is/are moved to correct Zernike modes above the threshold order. Other preferred, but optional, features of the invention are set out in the appended claims.
In order that the invention can be more readily understood, reference will now be made, by way of example only, to the accompanying drawings in which:
In all embodiments described herein, the mirror 10 comprises a copper substrate 14 whose outer face 16 provides a reflecting surface by virtue of a series of thin dielectric coatings provided on the outer surface 16 (not shown). At least one active piezoelectric element 18 is bonded to the substrate 14 using epoxy resin 20. An array of electrodes 22 are used to activate the piezoelectric element(s) 18. Applying a potential to the electrodes 22 causes the piezoelectric element(s) 18 to deform so that, in turn, the substrate 14 deforms to create a mirror 10 with a desired shape, convex for example. In order to enable the stress induced by the piezoelectric element 18 to be coupled effectively to the substrate 14, the epoxy resin 20 should be as thin as possible. However, if the resin 20 is to be very thin, it must also be uniform. If the epoxy resin 20 is too thick there will be unnecessary loss of coupling efficiency; if the epoxy resin 20 is too thin, the sheer strength of the glue will be compromised. This is of course true for all embodiments of the present invention illustrated herein. In a further embodiment of the invention, glass spacers (normally used in the manufacture of liquid crystal devices) are interposed between the substrate 14 and the piezoelectric element 18 thereby enabling a uniformly thin layer of epoxy resin 20 to be achieved between the substrate 14 and the piezoelectric element 18.
In addition, each embodiment includes at least one actuator fabricated 24 from magnetostrictive or electrostrictive material. The actuators 24 are attached at one end to a base 25 of a mount 26 and, at its other end, either to the piezo-electric element 18 or directly to the substrate 14. Applying a potential to the actuator 24 causes it to expand or contract thereby deforming the substrate 14 and hence the mirror 10.
Turning first to the embodiment of
In this first embodiment, a single actuator 24 is rigidly bonded to both the base 25 and the centre of the piezoelectrical element 18. The actuator 24 is in the shape of an elongate cylinder and is stepped to form a narrowed head 32 at its top. In this particular embodiment, only the Zernike mode for focus needs to be filtered out and so a single actuator 24 placed at the centre of the mirror 10 is sufficient to meet this requirement.
Further embodiments of the present invention will now be described. The embodiments are very similar and so corresponding parts have been assigned corresponding reference numerals and will not be described again in order to avoid unnecessary repetition.
A second embodiment of the present invention is shown in
In the example shown there are a total of thirteen actuators 24 arranged as follows: there is a single central actuator 24 surrounded by two concentric rings of six actuators 24. The rings are placed one third and two thirds of the way along the radius of the mirror 10 and the actuators 24 within the rings are arranged such that they are paired to sit on a common radius.
Actuators 24 can be screwed directly into the substrate 14 even where a monolithic piezoelectric element 18 is used, as follows. Holes are punched through the monolithic piezoelectric element 18 using an ultrasonic drill where the actuator 24 needs to pass through.
In a fifth embodiment shown in
A deformable bimorph mirror 50 and a mount 52 according to a sixth embodiment of the present invention are shown in
Whilst the outer edges of the mount's body 54 are regular, the internal edges 58 are stepped to form a series of three interconnected and concentric circular apertures 56 a-c that increase in size from top to bottom. The stepped inner profile 58 of the mount 52 produces a series of three shoulders 60 a-c. Twenty generally L-shaped flexible beams 62 extend downwardly in cantilever fashion from the topmost 60 a of these shoulders 60 a-c. The twenty beams 62 are of identical size and shape and are equispaced around the circular topmost shoulder 60 a. The beams 62 are L-shaped such that they extend downwardly from the topmost shoulder 60 a before turning through 90° to extend inwardly towards the centre of the middle aperture 56 b. Rather than having a pure L-shape, a square-shaped support shoulder 64 extends from the internal corner of each beam 62 as best seen in
The inwardly-extending portion 70 of the beam 62 extends beyond the support shoulder 64 to provide an upwardly-facing support surface 72 for receiving the mirror 50. The mount 52 and the beams 62 are sized such that the mirror 10 may be received within the beams 62 to be supported from below by the support surfaces 72 and so that the mirror's edge 74 fits snugly against the upright face 76 of the support shoulders 64. Hence, the mirror 50 is held firmly in place.
The mirror 50 is best seen in
As the mirror 50 deforms, it remains firmly held in place against the support surface 72 and support shoulder 64 because the beam 62 deflects with the mirror 10 by flexing about its neck 68, as shown in
The person skilled in the art will appreciate that modifications can be made to the embodiments described hereinabove without departing from the scope of the invention.
Use of unimorph, bimorph or multilayer piezoelectric elements 18 can be freely varied according to need in any of the embodiments. In addition, the type of actuators 24 used may be varied in each embodiment. Suitable types of actuators 24 include magnetostrictive, electrostrictive, piezoelectric, electromagnetic, hydraulic, mechanical or electromechanical. An example of an electrostrictive material is PMN (lead magnesium nitrate).
The arrangement of actuators 24 given herein are merely examples of preferred configurations and may be varied without departing from the scope of the invention. Moreover, many types of standard configurations of piezoelectric elements 18; 80 can be used in order to obtain the desired deformation of the mirror 10; 50. In particular, the choice of using a monolithic piezoelectric element 18; 80 or an array of discrete piezoelectric elements 18; 80 can be made for each of the embodiments shown.
Details of the mirror 10; 50 and how it is arranged to deform are given as useful background in which to set the context of the present invention, but are not essential to the invention. Other mirror configurations can be equally well accommodated by the present invention.
Whilst one of the above embodiments uses L-shaped beams 62, strict compliance with this shape is not necessary. For example, the support shoulders 64 may be omitted and the peripheral edge of the mirror 74 may abut against the upright face of the beam 62. This arrangement would lead to a longer neck 68 that could flex along its entire height. In addition, the beam 62 could be J-shaped rather than being L-shaped. This may be advantageous where the mirror 50 has rounded edges rather than square edges. In fact, the beam 62 may be shaped to conform to any profile the mirror 50 may have, e.g. to conform to chamfered edges.
Furthermore, the beams 62 need not necessarily extend downwardly from the mount body 54 to house the mirror 50 within the mount body 54. An alternative arrangement is shown in
A further alternative arrangement of the beams 62 is shown in
A yet further embodiment is shown in
The advantage of this arrangement is that the shape of the flexible beams 62′″ allows vertical movement of the mirror's edge. This provides additional enhancement by further minimising the ratio of the total diameter of the mirror 50′″ to the active diameter. This reduces the overall mirror diameter required to achieve a given stroke for a set applied voltage and bandwidth by virtually eliminating any dead space from the outside of the mirror 50′″.
As will be appreciated by the skilled person, other arrangements of the beams 62 are possible. For example, the flexible beams 62 could extend inwardly to meet a supporting end of the beam 62. Essentially, any arrangement could be used where the supporting end of the beam 62 is connected to the mount body 54 by a flexible neck 68 that allows the supporting end to bend as the mirror 50 deforms.
Whilst the mount 52 of the above embodiments is made from stainless steel, many other materials such as other metals, plastics, glasses or ceramics could be used instead.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3904274 *||Aug 27, 1973||Sep 9, 1975||Itek Corp||Monolithic piezoelectric wavefront phase modulator|
|US3972600||Nov 12, 1973||Aug 3, 1976||Braun Aktiengesellschaft||Mirror with adjustable focal distance|
|US4239343||Sep 4, 1979||Dec 16, 1980||General Dynamics Corporation||Actuator configuration for a deformable mirror|
|US4655563 *||Nov 25, 1985||Apr 7, 1987||Itek Corporation||Variable thickness deformable mirror|
|US4733945 *||Jan 15, 1986||Mar 29, 1988||The Perkin-Elmer Corporation||Precision lens mounting|
|US5801891||Apr 14, 1997||Sep 1, 1998||Eastman Kodak Company||Flat mirror mounting flexure|
|US6048070 *||Feb 28, 1996||Apr 11, 2000||Raytheon Company||Durable large stroke deformable mirror|
|US6236490 *||Jan 5, 2000||May 22, 2001||The B. F. Goodrich Company||Dual stage deformable mirror|
|US6307688 *||Nov 22, 1999||Oct 23, 2001||Carl-Zeiss-Stiftung||Optical system, in particular projection-illumination unit used in microlithography|
|US6388823 *||Jun 18, 1999||May 14, 2002||Carl-Zeiss-Stiftung Trading As Carl Zeiss||Optical system, especially a projection light facility for microlithography|
|US6398373||Aug 9, 2000||Jun 4, 2002||Asml Us, Inc.||Pneumatic control system and method for shaping deformable mirrors in lithographic projection systems|
|US6425671||Apr 13, 2000||Jul 30, 2002||Alan Adler||Optical mirror flexing structure and assembly|
|EP0743541A1||Mar 6, 1996||Nov 20, 1996||Yalestown Corporation N.V.||Multiple layer piezoelectric deformable bimorphic mirror|
|EP0793120A1||May 6, 1996||Sep 3, 1997||Yalestown Corporation N.V.||Mosaic adaptive bimorph mirror|
|JPS61285424A||Title not available|
|WO1995021394A1||Feb 2, 1995||Aug 10, 1995||Paul Alfred Ellsmore||Improved adjustable mirror|
|WO2002012948A2||Aug 8, 2001||Feb 14, 2002||Silicon Valley Group||Pneumatic control system and method for shaping deformable mirrors in lithographic projection systems|
|WO2003016976A2||Aug 6, 2002||Feb 27, 2003||Klaus Beck||Device for adjusting an optical element|
|1||A. V. Ikramov et al., "Bimorph Adaptive Mirror", Soviet Journal of Quantum Electronics, American Institute of Physics, vol. 22, No. 2, Feb. 1, 1992, pp. 163-166, XP000273608.|
|2||EP Search Report of EP 02 25 8826 dated May 22, 2003.|
|3||GB Search Report of GB 0230038.2 dated Mar. 4, 2003.|
|4||GB Search Report of GB 0309976.9 dated Sep. 16, 2003.|
|5||International Search Report of PCT/GB03/05555 mailed Apr. 27, 2004.|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US7473878 *||Jun 8, 2007||Jan 6, 2009||The Boeing Company||High power bimorph wave-front correction mirror|
|US7649691||Jun 20, 2008||Jan 19, 2010||The Boeing Company||Dynamic variable shape optical element|
|US7740363 *||Dec 18, 2003||Jun 22, 2010||Bae Systems Plc||Deformable-mirror holder|
|US8876306 *||Sep 14, 2012||Nov 4, 2014||Thales||Mirror comprising mechanical means for generating primary geometrical aberrations|
|US9016877||Jul 20, 2010||Apr 28, 2015||Massachusetts Institute Of Technology||System for discretely actuated solar mirrors|
|US9104028 *||Jan 25, 2012||Aug 11, 2015||Alpao||Deformable mirror with capacitive sensors|
|US20060082909 *||Dec 18, 2003||Apr 20, 2006||Griffith Michael S||Deformable-mirror holder|
|US20120204859 *||Aug 16, 2012||Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc.||Method and apparatus to control a focal length of a curved reflector in real time|
|US20130070355 *||Mar 21, 2013||Thales||Mirror Comprising Mechanical Means for Generating Primary Geometrical Aberrations|
|US20140085740 *||Jan 25, 2012||Mar 27, 2014||Alpao||Deformable mirror with capacitive sensors|
|US20140285880 *||Mar 19, 2013||Sep 25, 2014||Goodrich Corporation||High correctability deformable mirror|
|DE102014209153A1 *||May 14, 2014||Jul 2, 2015||Carl Zeiss Smt Gmbh||Optisches Modul|
|WO2012012065A1||Jun 20, 2011||Jan 26, 2012||Massachusetts Institute Of Technology||System for discretely actuated solar mirrors|
|U.S. Classification||359/849, 359/846|
|International Classification||G02B26/06, G02B26/08, G02B7/18, G02B5/08|
|Cooperative Classification||G02B26/06, G02B26/0825|
|European Classification||G02B26/08M2, G02B26/06|
|Jun 7, 2005||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: BAE SYSTEMS PLC, UNITED KINGDOM
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:GRIFFITH, MICHAEL STEWART;ARCHER, NICHOLAS JOHN;LAYCOCK,LESLIE CHARLES;REEL/FRAME:017484/0763
Effective date: 20040123
|Nov 10, 2011||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4