|Publication number||US7397232 B2|
|Application number||US 11/584,945|
|Publication date||Jul 8, 2008|
|Filing date||Oct 23, 2006|
|Priority date||Oct 21, 2005|
|Also published as||US7777476, US20070159156, US20090066315|
|Publication number||11584945, 584945, US 7397232 B2, US 7397232B2, US-B2-7397232, US7397232 B2, US7397232B2|
|Inventors||Jun Hu, Jiang Zhe|
|Original Assignee||The University Of Akron|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (12), Referenced by (10), Classifications (10), Legal Events (2)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/729,262 filed Oct. 21, 2005 now pending, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Development of this invention is funded United States Government grant Nos. NSF DMR 0210508 and NIH R15 DK61316-01. The U.S. Government may have certain rights in this invention.
The present invention is generally related to a multichannel particle counting method and a device for practicing the method. Such counters can be used to count micro-scale and/or nano-scale particles and the like. Counters within the scope of the present invention generally operate by sensing changes in resistance, conductivity, conductance or the like. More particularly, as a particle passes through a channel, it disrupts the ion current therein, thus increasing the channel's resistance.
Quantitative measurements of the size and concentration of micro and nano scale particles has been accomplished using Coulter counters. A typical Coulter counter device comprising a single micropore that separates two chambers containing electrolyte solutions. When a particle flows through the microchannel, it results in the electrical resistance change of the liquid filled microchannel. The resistance change can be recorded in terms of current or voltage pulses, which can be correlated to size, mobility, surface charge and concentration of the particles. Due to the simple construction of these devices and the reliable sensing method, Coulter devices have found application in a broad range of particle analyses from blood cells to polymeric beads, DNA, virus particles and even metal ions.
One substantial disadvantage of existing Coulter counters is their low throughput efficiency, which substantially extends measurement times. Coulter counting measurement relies on particles passing through a tiny orifice (microchannel) one by one from one chamber to the other. Thus, in order to complete sampling of a small number of particle solutions, thousands of micro or nanoparticles have to pass through the orifice one by one, which could be prohibitively time consuming. For instance, one estimate shows that a sample having a particle concentration of 108 particles/mL (v/v ratio 0.026%) requires 27.7 hours to complete a measurement, assuming each particle takes about 0.05 seconds to pass through the orifice, only one particle is resident in the orifice at any given time, and assuming a 0.01 mL sample volume. The measurement time is further extended as the orifice size decreases.
A variety of approaches to alleviating the time-measurement issue have been tried in the art. For instance, electroosmosis and electrophoresis have been applied to drive particles and electrolyte fluids. However, both methods have fallen short. Particularly, in order to obtain a sufficient fluid velocity, a strong external electric field must be applied leading to high power consumption, which is not practical for most biological applications. Furthermore, electroosmosis and electrophoresis only drive charged particles. Thus, if the particles are only slightly charged or neutral, electric forces are too weak to substantially shorten measurement time. Accordingly, there is a deficiency in the art in that it lacks a high throughput particle counting method and device, which is compatible with biological particles.
The present invention overcomes the challenges and deficiencies of the prior art by providing a particle counting method and device having a plurality of orifices, which are capable of counting particles in parallel with one another. Furthermore, such systems are compatible with biological particles inasmuch as it circumvents the need for electrophoretic or electroosmotic fields. Thus, the present invention fills a substantial gap in the art.
The present invention is generally directed to a multichannel particle counting device comprising a membrane dividing a first reservoir and a second reservoir; the membrane including a plurality of orifices disposed therethrough, through which the first and second reservoirs maintain fluid communication; the orifices further including a control electrode, wherein each control electrode is substantially electrically isolated from every other control electrode; the first reservoir including a first electrode, which electrode is in electrical communication with a power supply; the second reservoir including a second electrode, which electrode is in electrical communication with a measuring circuit; and the reservoirs containing an electrolyte solution.
A method for rapidly counting particles comprising the steps of charging one reservoir of the foregoing device with at least one particle to be measured; applying a voltage across the first and second electrodes; allowing the particles to migrate from one reservoir to the other through the plurality of orifices; detecting the signals generated by particles passing through the plurality of orifices; deconvoluting the signals detected; counting the deconvoluted signals; and correlating the signals to a number of particles.
The present invention generally relates to a method for rapidly counting particles using a plurality of orifices for simultaneously sensing particles. The present invention also generally relates to a device for practicing the method of the present invention.
The method of the present invention includes providing a plurality of orifices that are capable of passing particles to be counted, wherein the diameter of the orifices is such that they can pass the particles one at a time, i.e., in single file. In general the orifices separate two electrolyte solutions, wherein one solution is in electrical communication with a cathode and the other is in electrical communication with an anode. When a voltage is applied across the cathode/anode pair, an ion current flows through the orifices. Thus, a signal is generated when at least one particle enters at least one orifice, thereby obstructing the flow of ion current and raising resistance. The signal can be read conveniently in terms of current or voltage. Furthermore, the present invention simultaneously detects particles in a plurality of orifices. Since these orifices are in a parallel electrical relationship, the signals generated thereby are multiplexed, and thus must be deconvoluted. The Hardmard transformation makes it possible to deconvolute the signal of the multiplexed particle counting device of the present invention.
Membranes within the scope of the present invention can be fabricated from a wide variety of materials including without limitation organic polymers such as polymethyl methacrylates, polycarbonates, polyimides, polyphenols, chlorinated polyolefins, and the like. Additionally, membranes within the scope of the present invention can be fabricated from silicon, n-type silicon, p-type silicon, and the like. Membrane materials within the scope of the present invention should be stable under ordinary usage conditions, and should be capable of forming the pores and other micro and/or nano structures comprising the present invention.
Electrodes within the scope of the present invention can be fabricated from any of a variety of materials including without limitation, Ag|AgCl, platinum, and graphite electrodes.
Any of a variety of electrolytes can be used as the electrolyte of the present invention. In general, acceptable electrolytes are compatible with the selected electrode(s), and comprise cations and anions having similar mobilities. For instance, when the selected electrode is Ag|AgCl acceptable electrolytes include, without limitation, KCl and NaCl.
An example of the present invention is shown in
In order to detect a particle passing through a particular channel the response of each individual channel needs to be obtained in the form of a current or voltage pulse. However, since all of the channels are in electrical communication with the electrolyte solutions the signal sensed by the measurement circuit is the sum of the signals from all channels at any given time. The present invention is able to deconvolute the raw superposition of signals, and records the signals of each individual channel.
The raw signal obtained from the measurement circuit is deconvoluted according to the following process. The on/off states of the four control electrodes (S1, S2, S3) are controlled with a pseudorandom sequence. The current i4, measured from transistor 4, is the sum of the current through selected channels. A channel is selected when its transistor is off. Thus, if a control electrode is off the current through the channel will be input Transistor 4.
i1 + i2 + i3
i1 + i2
i2 + i3
Desired current combinations can be measured (Matrix Y) by setting the desired switching sequence (matrix S) of control electrodes. For the sequence code in Table 1, the sequence matrix S can be written as:
The Hardmard transformation can be used to find the current response of individual channels since the switching sequence is known. Therefore the current response of individual channel X, can be calculated as the dot product of matrix Y and the inverse of matrix S:
X=S −1 ·Y
Furthermore, four combinations are needed in order to solve this equation because it entails four unknown currents.
In a Hardmard Transformation, the mean square error is reduced by a factor of (n+1)2/4n indicating that the signal-to-noise ratio is increased by a factor of (n+1)/4n1/2. Thus, as the number of channels increases, the signal-to-noise channel improves.
One embodiment of the present invention comprises a device 400 for quantitatively detecting the concentration and particle size of pollen in air. For instance, the multiplexed particle counting device 400 of the present invention can be outfitted with an air sampling device 410 according to
This system 400 operates as follows. The vacuum pump 432 draws air into the sample bottle 412 through air intake port 414. Any particles that may be present impact the liquid electrolyte surface 416 and are deposited therein while the gas is drawn out of the sample bottle 412 through the vacuum pump 442. The particle-laden electrolyte solution then travels through the electrolyte output port 430 and down the liquid line leading to the particle counting portion 432 of the device 400, where the particles are then counted. Furthermore, the liquid can be induced to flow through the counting portion 432 by maintaining a positive pressure on the sampling side of the counting portion 432. For instance, as shown in
Another embodiment of the present invention comprises a device for detecting the concentration and particle size of chemical and/or biological warfare agents such as weaponized (i.e., aerosolized) anthrax. In still another embodiment, the present invention comprises a device for detecting toxins, impurities, or microbial or viral contaminants in waters, such as drinking water. Still another embodiment of the present invention comprises a device for rapidly counting blood cells, and/or comparing the number of red blood cells to white blood cells.
I. Pollen Detection Embodiments:
One non-limiting embodiment of the present invention comprises a multi-aperture Coulter counter, as shown in
In this embodiment, the central reservoir and one half of each of the four mini-channels can be formed by drilling holes in a polymethyl methacrylate (PM) block. Furthermore, each of four additional PM blocks can be drilled to form the other half of a mini-channel and a peripheral reservoir. After the holes are drilled, the PM blocks can be cleaned, for example, with ethyl alcohol and/or sonicated in an ultrasound bath. The microapertures are fabricated by piercing four polymer membranes with a heated micro needle. The membranes can be examined under a high-precision microscope, and the microapertures are found to have diameters between 90 μm and 110 μm, as shown in Table 2.
The nominal thickness of the membrane is about 100 μm. However, due to the hot-piercing microaperture fabrication process, the length of each microaperture might change considerably from the nominal thickness of the membrane, which is determined later.
According to this non-limiting embodiment, the first channel can be formed by applying epoxy to one mini-channel side of the PM block with the central reservoir, and to the mini-channel side of one of the PM blocks with a peripheral reservoir. A membrane can be placed between the two blocks, carefully aligned so that its microaperture is centered between the two halves of the mini-channel. The blocks are then clamped together for two to five hours, or until the two blocks and the membrane are firmly attached. A pair of 1 mm holes, located 5 mm away from the membrane on both sides, can be drilled in the PM blocks. The Ag/AgCl electrodes are placed on both sides of the membrane through the 1 mm holes. Then epoxy can be applied to fix the electrodes and seal the mini-channel. The same procedure is repeated for the other three peripheral blocks to form a four-aperture sensor. One of ordinary skill in the art will readily appreciate that a variety of alternative materials, fabrication techniques, and electrodes can be used to form a device within the scope of the present invention.
As a particle passes through the microaperture there is a change in the electrical resistance of the aperture. This leads to a change in the voltage Vs across the measurement resistance Rs. From the circuit model in
where δRc is the change in aperture resistance, Rc is the resistance of the aperture when no particles are present, Vcc is the applied DC voltage, Vs is the voltage measured across the sampling resistor when the aperture is filled only with electrolyte solution and Vs′ is the peak voltage measured across the sampling resistor as a particle passes through the microaperture.
For a microaperture with length L and diameter D (see
where d is the diameter of the particle, L′ is the corrected aperture length to account for fabrication artifacts, which equals L+0.8D. Equation 2 holds when (d/D)3<0.1, as is the case in this and other embodiments. Thus, the particle diameter can be calculated from the relative change in resistance according to:
In one embodiment, a four-aperture sensor has four sampling resistors Rs1, Rs2, Rs3 and Rs4, across which four voltage measurements Vs1, Vs2, Vs3 and Vs4 are made. The overall measurement setup for the four-aperture sensor is electrically equivalent to the circuit shown in
Example of Pollen Detection Embodiment:
One working example of the present invention is set forth as follows. Four types of micro-scale particles are chosen for a test of a multi-aperture sensor embodiment. They are polymethacrylate (PM) particles with diameters of 40 μm and 20 μm, Rocky Mountain Juniper (Juniper Scopulorum) pollen, and Cottonwood pollen. All particles are obtained from Sigma Aldrich, Inc. PM particles are chosen because they are commercially available and have well-characterized properties. The diameters of the pollen particles are determined using high-resolution optical microscopy, and range from 17.5 μm to 22.5 μm for the Juniper pollen and 20 μm for Cottonwood pollen.
For experiments involving the polymethacrylate (PM) particles, 40 μm and 20 μm particle solutions can be prepared by diluting 0.1 mL of the original solution, which has 10% solid content, in 2 mL and 10 mL of deionized water, respectively. The estimated particle concentrations of the 40 μm and 20 μm particle solutions are approximately 1.2×105 mL−1 and 2×105 mL−1, respectively. For experiments involving Rocky Mountain Juniper pollen particles, a solution can be prepared by diluting 0.1 mL of the original pollen particles in 7 mL of deionized water.
In each example, 1 mL of the prepared particle solution is added to the central reservoir using a microsyringe. The liquid in the central reservoir is agitated to make sure that the particles are well dispersed. A gravity-induced pressure difference is created by placing the central reservoir at a higher level than the peripheral reservoirs. Pressure-driven flow forces the particle solution to move towards the peripheral reservoirs through the four sensing apertures.
The sampling resistor for each channel is Rs=100 kΩ, and the applied voltage across the electrodes of each channel is Vcc=3V. The entire measurement architecture is placed in a Faraday cage to reduce and/or control noise. As the particles pass through the microapertures, voltage pulses across all sampling resistors can be recorded simultaneously using, for example, a National Instruments NI-6220 data acquisition board. The voltages can be monitored in real time using, for example, LabView software with a sampling frequency of 20 kHz. The data obtained are converted to relative resistance change (δRc/Rc) using Equation (1). This relative change is used to estimate the particle diameter (i.e., using Equation (3)). Particle concentration can be estimated by counting the number of resistive pulses during a selected time period.
Typical voltage traces resulting from the foregoing example are shown in
The ratio of the resistance change (δRc/Rc) for each microaperture, calculated using Equation (1), is plotted as a function of time in
The calibrated aperture length can be used to calculate particle diameter using Equation (3).
The concentration of the particles in the four channels can be calculated from the number of peaks during a one second period as shown in
Typical voltage traces with pulses are shown in
This phenomenon indicates that a particle affects the microaperture resistance in two competing ways. First, it displaces electrolyte solution in the microaperture, thereby reducing the number of free ions inside the microaperture, which leads to an increase in resistance. Second, if it has a surface charge, it brings additional charges into the microaperture, which leads to a decrease in resistance. According to the results from this example, the pollen particles have high surface charge, while the PM particles are only slightly charged. When the surface charge is high and the concentration of ions in the electrolyte solution is low, as is the case for pollen particles in this example, the second factor is dominant, and the overall effect of a pollen particle passing through a microaperture is a downward resistive pulse. This phenomenon can be used to differentiate pollen particles from other only slightly charged particles. It is also possible to measure pollen particle size using electrolyte solution of high concentration, so that the particle size plays the dominant role in the size of the resistive pulse.
In order to further demonstrate that this embodiment can be used to differentiate various particles, two additional particles, 20 μm polymethacrylate particles and Cottonwood pollen, are tested using a single Coulter cell (channel 1 with the 110 μm aperture). These two particles are chosen because they are similar in size to Juniper pollen but may differ in surface properties.
Typical traces of resistive pulses are shown in
Like Juniper pollen, Cottonwood pollen particles generate downward resistive pulses (a decrease in resistance) when they pass through the microaperture (
A scatter plot of normalized δRc/Rc for the four particles is shown in
The results for both the PM particle and pollen experiments indicate that this instrument is capable of counting particles through the four microapertures simultaneously. In contrast to a single channel Coulter counter, the counting efficiency is improved by a factor of approximately three. This counting efficiency can be further improved by integrating more sensing apertures in a micromachined device. The noise in the sensed voltages averages to about 0.1 mV. Thus, this embodiment should be able to detect particles that produce pulses larger than this noise level. Accordingly, this embodiment is capable of detecting particles with diameters larger than approximately 8.2 μm, or 6.9% of the microaperture diameter. We expect that the sensitivity can be improved by using better shielding and electronics to reduce the noise level.
The foregoing example demonstrates that some embodiments of the present invention can be used to distinguish between kinds of particles and to count pollen and other particles with significantly improved efficiency.
According to this example, uncertainty analysis is carried out using the methods of Moffat, Kline and Coleman and Steele. There are three sources of uncertainty in the estimation of the particle size. The first source is due to uncertainty in measurement of the microaperture diameter and in the calibration procedure used to determine microaperture length. Due to the fabrication process used to make the microapertures, the microapertures vary in size. The uncertainty in measuring the diameter is ±10%. The calibration process for determining the length presumes that the measured diameter is correct. The uncertainty in diameter causes a maximum uncertainty of ±42.5% for microaperture length. Together, the uncertainties in aperture diameter and length contribute a maximum of ±12.1% uncertainty in particle size evaluation. Note that this source of uncertainty systematically alters the estimates of the particle diameters and can be reduced by calibrating the sensor using quasi-monodisperse particles in a number of standard sizes. Taking data using two different particle sizes, for example, allows the practitioner to solve for both the effective diameter and the effective length of a microaperture, thereby reducing uncertainty for both parameters.
The second source of uncertainty is due to fluctuations in the output voltage, which are about ±0.05 mV at base voltage levels of 0.22 V. These fluctuations could be due to either flow unsteadiness or the measurement electronics, and appear to have no systematic trend. According to Equation (3), this uncertainty contributes to an uncertainty of ±0.58% and ±4.5% in particle diameter estimation for 40 μm and 20 μm polymethacrylate particles, respectively.
The third source of uncertainty is due to particles passing off-axis through the aperture. Given the shape of the pulses observed, we expect a maximum increase of about 10% in the measured response. This corresponds to an uncertainty of ±3.3% in particle size. Combining the three uncertainty sources, the uncertainties of particle size estimation are ±12.5% and ±13.2% for 40 μm and 20 μm polymethacrylate particles, respectively. The foregoing results show that the measurement error of the counter is well within this uncertainty error range.
II. Label-Free Resistive Pulse Sensor Embodiments:
The measurement circuit for one sensing channel is equivalent to the circuit in
For a microchannel with length L and diameter D (see
According to one very specific example, the central reservoir and half of each of the four mini channels can be fabricated by drilling holes in a polymethyl methacrylate (PM) block. In each of four additional PM blocks, holes are drilled to form the other half of a mini channel and a peripheral reservoir. According to this example, the central reservoir is 12 mm in diameter and 10 mm deep. Each peripheral reservoir is 10 mm in diameter and 10 mm deep. The mini channel is 4 mm in diameter. After the holes are drilled, the PM blocks are cleaned with isopropanol and sonicated in an ultrasound bath. The microchannels are fabricated by carefully piercing four polymer membranes with a heated micro needle. The membranes are inspected under a high precision microscope and the diameters of the microchannels are measured to be between 120 μm and 130 μm, as shown in Table 4. The thickness of the membrane (and therefore the length of each microchannel) is measured to be approximately 100 μm.
To assemble the device, the PM block with the central reservoir and one of the PM blocks with a peripheral reservoir are picked, and epoxy is applied on the mini channel side of the two blocks. A membrane is placed between the two blocks and is carefully aligned so that its microchannel is centered between the two halves of the mini channel. The blocks are then clamped together and kept about two to five hours, or until the two blocks and the membrane are firmly attached together. A pair of 1 mm holes, located 5 mm away from each membrane on both sides, is drilled on the PM blocks. The 1 mm diameter Ag/AgCl electrodes are placed on both sides of the membrane through the 1 mm holes. Then epoxy is applied to fix the electrodes and seal the mini channel. The same procedure is repeated for the other three peripheral blocks to form a four-channel sensor.
Four microparticles, polymethacrylate particles with well-characterized diameters of 20 μm (20 μm±0.5 μm) and 40 μm (40 μm±0.8 μm) (Sigma Aldrich Inc.), Rocky Mountain Juniper (Juniper Scopulorum) tree pollens (Sigma Aldrich Inc.) and Populus deltidoes/Eastern Cottonwood pollens (Sigma Aldrich Inc.) are chosen for testing. These particles are chosen because they are commercially available and have well-characterized properties. The diameters of pollen particles are determined using high resolution optical microscopy. The cotton pollen had a diameter of about 20 μm. The Juniper tree pollen is egg-shaped and its diameter ranged from 17 μm to 23 μm.
Four particle solutions are prepared before the experiments. 40 μm polymethacrylate particle solutions are prepared by diluting 0.1 mL original particle solution, which has 10% solid content, in 2 mL of deionized water. The yield particle concentration of 40 μm solution is approximately 1.2×105 mL−1. 20 μm polymethacrylate particle solutions are prepared by diluting 0.1 mL original particle solution (10% solid content) in 7 mL of deionized water and the yield particle concentration of 20 μm solution is approximately 2.8×105 mL−1. For Cottonwood and Juniper tree pollen particles, the particle solutions are formed by diluting 0.1 mL of the original pollen particle solutions (10% solid content) in 7 mL of deionized water.
The prepared particle solution is injected into the peripheral reservoirs separately using a micro syringe. Juniper tree pollen particles, Cottonwood particles, 40 μm and 20 μm polymethacrylate particles are loaded into channels 1, 2, 3 and 4 respectively. The liquid in each peripheral reservoir is agitated to make sure that the particles are well dispersed. A pressure difference is formed by setting a level difference between the peripheral reservoirs and central reservoir. The particle solutions are driven to move from the peripheral reservoirs towards the central reservoir, which now act as a collecting/sink reservoir.
The entire measurement setup is placed in a Faraday cage to reduce noise. The applied electric potential across the pair of electrodes of each channel is Vcc=3 V. The sampling resistor for each channel is 100 kΩ. As the particles passes through the microchannels, voltage pulses across all sampling resistors are recorded simultaneously using a National Instruments NI-6220 data acquisition board. The voltages are monitored in real-time using LabView software with a sampling frequency of 20 KHz. The data obtained are converted to relative resistance change (δRc/Rc) using Equation (1). The relative change is used to estimate the particle diameter (using Equation (3)) and particle concentration.
Example of Label-Free High-Throughput Resistive-Pulse Sensing:
The typical measurement results of voltage traces across the four sampling resistors during a selected period of time are shown in
The voltage pulses of each microchannel are converted to the ratio of the resistance change using equation. The results are plotted in
The relative changes of resistance in channels 3 and 4 are used to calculate the polymethacrylate particle diameters using Equation (3).
As shown in
where μ is the mobility of the free ions, E is the applied electric field and A is the cross section area. Therefore the particle induces a decrease in ionic current (ΔIvolume) as usually expected. Second, if the particle has high surface charge (see
As demonstrated by this example, pollen generates downward resistive pulses. Thus, it can be used to differentiate between pollen particles from other slightly charged or non-charged particles.
20 μm polymethacrylate
40 μm polymethacrylate
According to this example, polymethacrylate particles generate upward resistive pulses while pollen particles generate downward pulses. From
Twenty micrometer polymethacrylate particles, Cottonwood pollen and Juniper pollen solutions are prepared separately as set forth previously. Mixture 1 is prepared by combining 7 mL 20 μm polymethacrylate particle solution, and 3 mL Juniper pollen solution. Mixture 2 is prepared by combining 7 mL 20 μm polymethacrylate particle solution, and 3 mL Cottonwood pollen solution. The estimated polymethacrylate particle concentration is calculated to be 1.99×105 mL−1 for both mixtures. The two particle mixtures are loaded to peripheral reservoirs 1 and 2, respectively. The microchannel diameters for channels 1 and 2 are 100 μm and 110 μm. Channels 3 and 4 are closed using polymer membranes without microchannels.
Typical traces of resistive pulses converted form the recorded voltage signal are shown in
The diameters and concentrations of polymethacrylate particles, calculated from experimental data in channels 1 and 2, are shown in Table 6.
Similar to the foregoing results of 20 μm polymethacrylate particles, the calculated particle diameters have larger variations than that which is specified by the manufacturer. The calculated concentrations of 20 μm polymethacrylate particles are 1.72×105 mL−1 and 1.94×105 mL−1, compared to the estimated actual concentration of 1.99×105 mL−1.
20.38 ± 2.51
20.00 ± 0.5
1.72 × 105
1.99 × 105
20.44 ± 2.27
20.00 ± 0.5
1 × 105
1.99 × 105
These results indicate that this multi-channel resistive-pulse sensor is capable of differentiating and counting multiple particle solutions through the four microchannels simultaneously. In contrast to a typical Coulter counter that can only analyze one particle solution, the sensor throughput is improved approximately 300%. The throughput can be further improved by fabricating more sensing channels in the device. The noise seen in the measured voltages averaged ±0.05 mV, so the device is capable of detecting particles that produce pulses larger than this noise level.
This suggests that the device is capable of detecting particles with diameters larger than approximately 8.9 μm, or 7.4% of the microchannel diameter. Sensitivity can be improved by improving shielding, and by the introduction of more sophisticated electronics to reduce the noise level. The multi-channel sensor reported herein combines size/surface charge exclusion separation and high throughput electronic detection in a simple device. The electrical properties or surface characteristics of biological particles are of great interest in recent years for novel rapid assays of these particles. These pollen results indicate that the multi-channel resistive-pulse device can be used to differentiate various pollen particles in terms of their surface characteristics and/or electrical properties. Although only four types of particles are tested, the resistive pulses due to the passage of various other biological particles are expected to exhibit distinct signals because of difference in electrical properties and/or surface characteristics of biological particles. Thus, some embodiments of the present invention provide a label-free means for detecting and counting biological particles. For instance, in addition to the size/surface charge exclusion, the measurement of the shape of the resistive pulses provides more detailed information of particles, including mobility, surface characteristics, electrical properties, and the like. In one embodiment, this could be done by reducing the particle travel velocity in the microchannel. Travel velocity can be controlled by forcing the particles to pass through microchannels using electrophoresis or a small pressure gradient, and by using a high sampling frequency.
Because of the simple structure of the multi-channel resistive-pulse device, throughput can be improved further by integrating more micro sensing channels. Further, some embodiments can comprise lab-on-a-chip devices having, for instance micromachined fluid channels, micro/nano-scale sensing channels and detection electronics. Additionally, use of multiple sensing channels enables multiplexing applications. This allows high throughput signal measurements with a high signal-to-noise ratio without compromising sensitivity. Therefore, the multi-channel resistive-pulse sensor embodiment can include a portable, high throughput micromachined device for micro and nano-scale bioparticle analysis.
Uncertainty analysis using the methods of Kline, Moffat and Coleman and Steele is carried out. There are three sources of uncertainty in the estimation of the particle size. The first source is due to uncertainty in the measurement of microchannel diameter and length. Due to the fabrication variation of the microchannel, these uncertainties are ±10% for diameter, and ±20% for channel length. These uncertainties contribute a ±10.5% uncertainty in particle size evaluation. Note that this source of uncertainty would systematically alter the estimated particle diameters.
The second source of uncertainty is due to the fluctuations in the output voltage, which are about ±0.05 mV at base voltage levels of 0.2 V. These fluctuations are due to measurement electronics and appear to have no systematic trend. According to Equation 5, this uncertainty contributes to an uncertainty of ±4.0% and ±0.7% in particle diameter estimation respectively for 20 μm particles and 40 μm particles.
The third source of uncertainty is due to the off-axis position when one particle passes through the microchannel. This results in a maximum uncertainty of about ±10% in the resistive pulse, which corresponds to an uncertainty of ±3.2% in particle size. Combining the three uncertainty sources, the uncertainties of particle size estimation are ±11.7% and 11% for 20 μm particles and 40 μm particles, respectively. The foregoing results show that the measurement error of the sensor is approximately within this uncertainty error range.
III. Microfluidic High-Throughput Resistive Pulse Sensor Embodiments:
The design concept of one embodiment is illustrated in
A simplified electrical circuit equivalent of the measurement setup is shown in
One challenge for using multiple sensing channels is the electronic coupling or crosstalk among channels because the electrolyte electrically connects all channels. When one particle passes through a microchannel, it generates a resistance change in this channel. Because all channels are electrically connected, a resistance change in one channel can cause a current change in other channels, and in turn induce a voltage change across the sampling resistors of other microchannels. This voltage change can be translated into a change in resistance signals of other channels that do not correspond to passing particles, thereby resulting in false detections. The placement of measurement electrodes in the center of microchannels creates an isolation resistor Rci′ between each pair of microchannels (see
The resistance of a microchannel can be estimated by R=ρL/A, where ρ is the resistivity of the electrolyte, L is the length of the microchannel, and A is the cross section of the microchannel. In this work, we use deionized (DI) water, with a resistivity of about 8.33×103 Ω-m, to carry the microparticles. For the microchannel we used, the estimated resistance of the DI water filled-microchannel (Rci′) is in the order of 100 MΩ. Thus, the crosstalk is negligible. When the channel size is scaled down to the submicron and nanometer level, according to the scaling law, Rci′ will be increased significantly, and thus much less crosstalk is expected. Therefore, some embodiments having nanoscale channels can operate without crosstalk even when using a more concentrated electrolyte having a lower resistivity. This is particularly useful because, concentrated electrolytes are often necessary for carrying certain bio-particles.
The microchannels and reservoirs are fabricated on polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) using soft lithography, and are bonded to a glass substrate with sputter gold electrodes. Device layout (microfluidic channels and electrodes) can be printed onto transparency films using a high-resolution laser printer. The transparency films can then be used as masks in contact photolithography to generate masters with a negative UV photoresist (MicroChem Corporation XP SU-8 2010, Newton, Mass.) on a glass slide for the channels.
According to one example, a curing agent and PDMS prepolymer (SYLGARD 184 Silicone Elastomer Kit, Dow Corning, Midland, Mich.) are mixed in a 1:10 weight ratio. The prepolymer mixture is degassed in a desiccator with a vacuum pump for one hour to remove any air bubbles in the mixture. Then, the prepolymer mixture is poured onto the master. The master/PDMS stack is cured for three hours at 80° C. on a hot plate. After curing, the thin PDMS replicas are cut and peeled off of the masters. Next, contact photolithography with a positive AZ 4620 photoresist (AZ Electronic Materials, Somerville, N.J.) is presented on another glass slide to create the electrode patterns. Cr/Au (50 Å/3000 Å) sheet films are evaporated on the glass slide. A subsequent liftoff process completes fabrication of the electrodes. The PDMS layer with developed channels and electrodes-embedded glass slide are then treated with RF oxygen plasma (Plasma Etcher PE 2000, South Bay Technology Inc., San Clemente, Calif.) for 25 seconds (50 W, 200 mTorr). This temporarily activates the exposed part of the PDMS and provides very good adhesion. The PDMS replica and glass side are then immediately brought into contact, aligned, and bonded together.
A single measurement channel comprises the half channel resistance Rci in series with the sampling resistor Rs and the supply voltage (see
For a micro-channel with length L and diameter D (see
An illustration of this embodiment follows. Polymethacrylate particles with diameters of 40 μm (40 μm±0.8 μm) (Sigma Aldrich Inc.), and Rocky mountain Juniper (Juniper Scopulorum) tree pollens (Sigma Aldrich Inc.) are chosen for the following example. These particles are chosen because they are commercially available and because polymethacrylate particles have well characterized properties. The diameters of pollen particles are determined using high resolution optical microscopy. The Juniper tree pollen is egg-shaped and the diameter ranges from 17 μm to 23 μm.
The particle solution is forced to flow through microchannels of the present invention by application of a pressure difference with a syringe. An applied voltage of Vcc=6V is applied across the microchannels. Due to the polarization effect of gold electrodes, such a high source voltage is necessary to ensure that there is sufficient current/electric field within the electrolyte to record a noticeable voltage change across the sampling resistors. Voltage measurements are made across a sampling resistor Rs=100 kΩ. The voltage trace is recorded for four channels using a National Instruments NI-6220 data acquisition board, with a sampling frequency of 50 kHz.
The application of a 6V DC voltage on the electrodes in electrolyte can, in some cases, cause electrolysis of water and generate gas bubbles. The gas bubbles can result in false peaks when they pass through the microchannel. No such bubbles are observed in this example.
The Juniper pollen particle solution is prepared by diluting 10 mg of Juniper tree pollen in 10 mL of water.
It is obvious from
Polymethacrylate particle solution (10% solid) 0.1 mL of 40 μm, and 10 mg Juniper pollen are mixed in 10 mL DI water and are tested in a multichannel embodiment. The resulting concentration of 40 μm polymethacrylate particles is 2.49×104 mL−1. Voltage traces across the sampling resistors are recorded. A typical resistive pulse trace in one channel (channel 3) is shown in
The particle diameters are calculated from resistive pulse data shown in
The foregoing examples are considered only illustrative of the principles of the invention rather than an exclusive list of embodiments. Further, since numerous modifications and changes will readily occur to those of ordinary skill in the art, the invention is not intended to be limited to the exact construction and operation shown and described, and accordingly, all suitable modifications and equivalents are within the scope of the present invention.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US2656508||Aug 27, 1949||Oct 20, 1953||Coulter Wallace H||Means for counting particles suspended in a fluid|
|US3793587 *||Mar 8, 1972||Feb 19, 1974||Licentia Gmbh||Particle volume and cross-section measurement|
|US4157498 *||Aug 1, 1977||Jun 5, 1979||Miles Laboratories, Inc.||Flow-through type particle analyzing apparatus|
|US4237416 *||Mar 22, 1978||Dec 2, 1980||Becton Dickinson And Company||Apparatus for counting and sizing particles suspended in a liquid electrolyte|
|US4760328 *||May 5, 1986||Jul 26, 1988||Integrated Ionics, Inc.||Particle counter having electrodes and circuitry mounted on the pane of the orifice|
|US5376878 *||Sep 27, 1993||Dec 27, 1994||Fisher; Timothy C.||Multiple-aperture particle counting sizing and deformability-measuring apparatus|
|US6175227 *||Jul 1, 1998||Jan 16, 2001||Coulter International Corp.||Potential-sensing method and apparatus for sensing and characterizing particles by the Coulter principle|
|US6300626 *||Aug 16, 1999||Oct 9, 2001||Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University||Time-of-flight mass spectrometer and ion analysis|
|US6426615 *||Apr 10, 2000||Jul 30, 2002||Shailesh Mehta||Apparatus and method for analyzing particles|
|US6703819 *||Dec 3, 2001||Mar 9, 2004||Board Of Regents, The University Of Texas System||Particle impedance sensor|
|US6959618 *||Aug 3, 2000||Nov 1, 2005||Chempaq A/S||Particle characterization apparatus|
|US7060992 *||Mar 10, 2004||Jun 13, 2006||Tiax Llc||System and method for bioaerosol discrimination by time-resolved fluorescence|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US8212575 *||Dec 29, 2008||Jul 3, 2012||Lexmark International, Inc.||Device for analyzing size and location of conductive item|
|US8522604 *||Oct 30, 2009||Sep 3, 2013||The University Of Akron||Metal wear detection apparatus and method employing microfluidic electronic device|
|US8771491||Mar 21, 2012||Jul 8, 2014||Quantapore, Inc.||Ultrafast sequencing of biological polymers using a labeled nanopore|
|US8906308||Jan 15, 2010||Dec 9, 2014||Abbott Laboratories||Method for determining volume and hemoglobin content of individual red blood cells|
|US8906309||Apr 26, 2010||Dec 9, 2014||Abbott Laboratories||Method for discriminating red blood cells from white blood cells by using forward scattering from a laser in an automated hematology analyzer|
|US8973531 *||Dec 9, 2011||Mar 10, 2015||Board Of Supervisors Of Louisiana State University And Agricultural And Mechanical College||Automated continuous zooplankton culture system|
|US20100109686 *||Oct 30, 2009||May 6, 2010||The University Of Akron||Metal wear detection apparatus and method employing microfluidic electronic device|
|US20100162796 *||Dec 29, 2008||Jul 1, 2010||David Thomas Shadwick||Device for Analyzing Size and Location of Conductive Item|
|US20120312243 *||Dec 13, 2012||Board Of Supervisors Of Louisiana State University And Agricultural And Mechanical College||Automated continuous zooplankton culture system|
|US20140123737 *||Nov 7, 2012||May 8, 2014||Agency For Science, Technology And Research||Apparatus for Detecting Particles in a Fluid and a Method of Fabricating the Same|
|U.S. Classification||324/71.4, 73/865.5, 324/71.1|
|International Classification||G01N15/00, G01N27/00|
|Cooperative Classification||G01N15/1245, G01N15/12, G01N15/1056|
|European Classification||G01N15/10M, G01N15/12|
|Mar 8, 2007||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: UNIVERSITY OF AKRON, OHIO
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:HU, JUN;ZHE, JIANG;REEL/FRAME:018991/0767
Effective date: 20061201
|Sep 23, 2011||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4