|Publication number||US7411565 B2|
|Application number||US 10/868,382|
|Publication date||Aug 12, 2008|
|Filing date||Jun 15, 2004|
|Priority date||Jun 20, 2003|
|Also published as||US20050030137|
|Publication number||10868382, 868382, US 7411565 B2, US 7411565B2, US-B2-7411565, US7411565 B2, US7411565B2|
|Inventors||William E. McKinzie, III, Rodolfo E. Diaz, Victor C. Sanchez, Eric Caswell|
|Original Assignee||Titan Systems Corporation/Aerospace Electronic Division|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (11), Non-Patent Citations (18), Referenced by (11), Classifications (8), Legal Events (4)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
The present patent document claims the benefit of the filing date under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) of Provisional U.S. Patent Application Ser. No. 60/480,098, filed Jun. 20, 2003, which is hereby incorporated by reference.
A portion of the disclosure herein was developed under DARPA contract number F19628-99-C-0080.
The present invention relates generally to high impedance surfaces. More particularly, the present invention relates to artificial magnetic conductor surfaces loaded with ferrite-based artificial magnetic materials.
A high impedance surface is a lossless, reactive surface whose equivalent surface impedance,
approximates an open circuit and which inhibits the flow of equivalent tangential electric surface current, thereby approximating a zero tangential magnetic field, Htan≈0. Etan and Htan are the electric and magnetic fields, respectively, tangential to the surface. High impedance surfaces have been used in various antenna applications. These applications range from corrugated horns which are specially designed to offer equal electric (E) and magnetic (H) plane half power beamwidths to traveling wave antennas in planar or cylindrical form. However, in these applications, the corrugations or troughs are made of metal where the depth of the corrugations is one quarter of a free space wavelength, λ/4, where λ is the wavelength at the frequency of interest. At high microwave frequencies, λ/4 is a small dimension, but at ultra-high frequencies (UHF, 300 MHz to 1 GHz), or even at low microwave frequencies (1-3 GHz), λ/4 can be quite large. For antenna applications in these frequency ranges, an electrically-thin (λ/100 to λ/50 thick) and physically thin high impedance surface is desired.
One example of a thin high-impedance surface is disclosed in D. Sievenpiper, “High-impedance electromagnetic surfaces,” Ph.D. dissertation, UCLA electrical engineering department, filed January 1999, and in PCT Patent Application number PCT/US99/06884.
The FSS 102 of the prior art high impedance surface 100 is a periodic array of metal patches 110 which are edge coupled to form an effective sheet capacitance. This is referred to as a capacitive frequency selective surface (FSS). Each metal patch 110 defines a unit cell which extends through the thickness of the high impedance surface 100. Each patch 110 is connected to the metal backplane 106, which forms a ground plane, by means of a metal via 108, which can be plated-through holes. The periodic array of metal vias 108 has been known in the prior art as a rodded media, so these vias are sometimes referred to as rods or posts. The spacer layer 104 through which the vias 108 pass is a relatively low permittivity dielectric typical of many printed circuit board substrates. The spacer layer 104 is the region occupied by the vias 108 and the low permittivity dielectric. The spacer layer is typically 10 to 100 times thicker than the FSS layer 102. Also, the dimensions of a unit cell in the prior art high-impedance surface are much smaller than λ at the fundamental resonance. The period is typically between λ/40 and λ/12. This configuration of metal patches 110 and metal vias 108 may be referred to as a thumbtack structure.
A frequency selective surface (FSS) is a two-dimensional array of periodically arranged elements which may be etched on, or embedded within, one or multiple layers of dielectric laminates. Such elements may be either conductive dipoles, patches, loops, or even slots. As a thin periodic structure, an FSS is often referred to as a periodic surface.
Frequency selective surfaces have historically found applications in out-of-band radar cross section reduction for antennas on military airborne and naval platforms. Frequency selective surfaces are also used as dichroic subreflectors in dual-band Cassegrain reflector antenna systems. In this application, the subreflector is transparent at frequency band f1 and opaque or reflective at frequency band f2. This allows placement of a feed horn for band f1 at the focal point for the main reflector, and another feed horn operating at f2 at the Cassegrain focal point. In this manner, a significant weight and volume savings can be achieved over using two conventional reflector antennas. Such savings is critical for space-based platforms.
The prior art high-impedance surface 100 provides many advantages over corrugated metal structures. The surface is constructed with relatively inexpensive printed circuit technology and can be made much lighter than a corrugated metal waveguide, which is typically machined from a block of aluminum. In printed circuit form, the prior art high-impedance surface can be 10 to 100 times less expensive for the same frequency of operation. Furthermore, the prior art surface offers a high surface impedance for both x and y components of tangential electric field, which is not possible with a corrugated waveguide. Corrugated waveguides offer high surface impedance for one polarization of electric field only. According to the coordinate convention used herein, a surface lies in the x-y plane and the z-axis is normal or perpendicular to the surface. Further, the prior art high-impedance surface provides a substantial advantage in its height reduction over a corrugated metal waveguide, and may be less than one-tenth the thickness of an air-filled corrugated metal waveguide.
A high-impedance surface is important because it offers a boundary condition which permits wire antennas conducting electric currents to be well-matched and to radiate efficiently when the wires are placed in very close proximity to this surface (e.g., less than λ/100 away). The opposite is true if the same wire antenna is placed very close to a metal or perfect electric conductor (PEC) surface. The wire antenna/PEC surface combination will not radiate efficiently due to a very severe impedance mismatch. The radiation pattern from the antenna on a high-impedance surface is confined to the upper half space, and the performance is unaffected even if the high-impedance surface is placed on top of another metal surface. Accordingly, an electrically-thin, efficient antenna is very appealing for countless wireless devices and skin-embedded antenna applications.
Another example of a high impedance surface is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,512,494 B1, issued to Diaz, et al. on Jan. 28, 2003. This reference discloses an artificial magnetic conductor which is resonant at multiple resonance frequencies. The artificial magnetic conductor is characterized by an effective media model which includes a first layer and a second layer. Each layer has a layer tensor permittivity and a layer tensor permeability having non-zero elements on the main tensor diagonal only. U.S. Pat. No. 6,512,494 B1 is incorporated herein in its entirety by this reference. The disclosed AMC is a two-layer, periodic, magnetodielectric structure where each layer is engineered to have a specific tensor permittivity and permeability behavior with frequency. This structure has the properties of an artificial magnetic conductor over a limited frequency band or bands, whereby, near its resonant frequency, the reflection amplitude is near unity and the reflection phase at the surface lies between +/−90 degrees. This engineered material also offers suppression of transverse electric (TE) and transverse magnetic (TM) mode surface waves over a band of frequencies near where it operates as a high impedance surface.
Test set-ups are used to experimentally verify the existence of a surface wave bandgap in an AMC. In each case, the transmission response (S21) is measured between two Vivaldi-notch radiators that are mounted so as to excite the dominant electric field polarization for TE and TM modes on the AMC surface. For the TE set-up, the antennas are oriented horizontally. For the TM set-up, the antennas are oriented vertically. Absorber is placed around the surface-under-test to minimize the space wave coupling between the antennas. The optimal configuration—defined empirically as “that which gives us the smoothest, least-noisy response and cleanest surface wave cutoff”—is obtained by trial and error. The optimal configuration is obtained by varying the location of the antennas, the placement of the absorber, the height of absorber above the surface-under-test, the thickness of absorber, and by placing a conducting foil wall between layers of absorber.
Broadband antennas such as spirals can be mounted over the thick foam core AMC 200 of
In most wireless communications applications, it is desirable to make the antenna ground plane as small and light weight as possible so that it may be readily integrated into physically small, light weight platforms. The relationship between the instantaneous bandwidth of an AMC such as the AMC 200 of
Here, h is the thickness of the spacer layer, λ0 is the free space wavelength at resonance where a zero degree reflection is observed and μr is the magnetic permeability of the spacer layer. As can be seen from this equation, to support a wide instantaneous bandwidth BW. the AMC thickness λ0 must be relatively large or the permeability must be high μr. For example, to accommodate an octave frequency range (BW/f0=0.667), the AMC thickness must be at least 0.106 λ0, corresponding to a physical thickness of 1.4 inches (3.56 cm) at a center frequency of 900 MHz. This thickness is too large for many practical applications. As noted, the antenna ground plane should be as small and light weight as possible.
Accordingly, there is a need for an improved artificial magnetic conductor with enhanced bandwidth offering reduced size and weight.
By way of introduction only, a new realization of an artificial magnetic conductor surface with enhanced bandwidth is disclosed. In one embodiment, the artificial magnetic conductor has the typical thumbtack structure with a spacer layer that is loaded with a magnetic material (one with permeability >1), such as barium-cobalt hexaferrite based artificial magnetic material. In one specific embodiment, the geometry consists of a ground plane covered with thinly sliced ferrite tiles that are metallized and stacked. Each tile has a metal via such as a plated through hole extending through its center that is electrically connected to the plated metallized surface. A foam spacer layer resides above the ferrite tiles. Atop the foam spacer layer rests a capacitive surface, which can be realized as a single layer array of metal patches, a multiple layer array of overlapping patches or other planar capacitive geometry. The periodicity of the metal patches in the capacitive FSS may be different from the periodicity of the ferrite tiles. Typically, an integral multiple of ferrite tiles will reside within the same footprint as a single capacitive patch. Metal vias connect the center of the capacitive patches to ground. Here again, the periodicity of the capacitive patch array vias will generally be different than that of the ferrite tile array vias, but typically an integral number of ferrite vias will correspond to each via in the patch array. When carefully designed, the above structure will result in a surface wave bandgap that corresponds with the high impedance frequency band. Also, this frequency band will be greater than that of a conventional AMC having a thumbtack structure of the same physical thickness.
The foregoing summary has been provided only by way of introduction. Nothing in this section should be taken as a limitation on the following claims, which define the scope of the invention.
The magnetically loaded artificial magnetic conductor (AMC) 600 includes a relatively low permittivity spacer layer 604 and a capacitive frequency selective surface (FSS) 602 formed on a metal backplane 606. The spacer layer 604 is loaded with a ferrite material 620, illustrated in greater detail in
The FSS 602 includes an array of conductive patches 610 on a first or upper side of the magnetically loaded AMC 600. Metal vias 608 extend through the spacer layer and connect the metal backplane 606 to the metal patches 610 of the FSS layer. In the illustrated example, there is not a one-to-one correspondence between vias 608 and patches 610. Every third patch 610 has a via to the backplane 606. Other ratios may be used as well.
Any magnetic material can be used for the spacer-layer, including elastomers loaded with iron nanoparticles and several different family types of ferrites. However, the most-appropriate family of ferrites for this problem is the Cobalt Z-types because they have the highest ferrimagnetic resonance frequency—which will result in the lowest magnetic loss at the microwave frequencies of interest. According to Smit and Wijn, Ferrites, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1959, Chapter XIV, section 51, a polycrystalline sample of the barium-cobalt hexaferrite (Ba3Co2Fe24O41 or CO2Z) has initial relative permeabilities of the order of 11 and a resonant frequency of the order of 1.5 GHz, while plane crystal-aligned samples (using a rotating magnetic field during pressing) have initial relative permeabilities of the order of 27 with a resonant frequency of the order of 1.2 GHz.
Realization of this ferrite involves complicated material processing techniques. To begin with, ceramic processing and compositional factors should be focused on crystallite size/perfection, and on grain boundary chemistry. Rate calcinations steps reducing time at peak temperature helps reduce crystallite agglomeration factors critical to magnetic alignment and dispersion characteristics. Grain boundary chemistry can be influenced by dopants after the calcinations process to promote densification, retard grain growth, and form a lower loss grain boundary area.
The basic composition for the Smit & Wijn BA3Co2Fe24O41 consists of:
Formulas should be “normalized” for raw material purity/assay values for each raw material used, targeting the molecular values.
Specific Process Description
“Red” mix the raw materials as uniformly as possible. (Darvan “C” can help particle dispersion) a de-ionized (D.I.) water liquid volume of 1.2 cc per gram of formula, worked well to minimize particle settling factors in the drying process. One exemplary embodiment used stainless steel attritor mixing.
Dry and granulate the mix through an 18 mesh or finer stainless steel screen. Rate calcine at 2° C. per minute, room temperature to 1230° C. (10 hours), Soak time ½ hours at 1230° C. A very short time at highest temperature reduces discontinuous particle/crystallite agglomeration factors. Less iron pick up in milling is important to control dielectric losses in the ferrite. A higher calcine temperature may be required for the Co2Z system.
“Black” mill the calcined (now magnetic) particles to fine, 1 micron or less in size. After calcinations, cycle add SiO2, Mn Co3, and CaCo3 dopants to promote densification and contribute to low dielectric loss characteristics.
High density and controlled crystallite growth are desirable for high permeability. The following dopants are suggested, added as a weight % to the calcined product in the “black” milling process:
Mn Co3→0.5 wt %
Si O2→0.2 wt %
Ca Co3→0.9 wt %
A de-ionized water liquid volume of 1.2 cc per gram of calcined formula with a Darvan “C” additive to help particle dispersion works well. Aggressive attritor milling at 350 RPM for 4 hours using stainless steel media produces a sintered ceramic high density and low loss. Actual iron pick-up needs to be established for the raw materials, process cycles, and grinding equipment used.
Wet pressing the milled product in the presence of an aligning magnetic field can greatly improve magnetic characteristics such as magnetic permeability as shown in the Smit and Wijn book.
Firing the pressed ceramic magnet to high density using again a rate controlled sintering cycle is recommended. Several variations can be tried using 1 block per firing cycle.
Sintering Cycles Suggested
RT→1260° C. 2° C./min (10½ hrs) ½ hr soak at 1260°
RT→1230° C. 2° C./min (10¼ hrs) ½ hr soak at 1230°
RT→1200° C. 2° C./min (10 hrs) ½ hr soak at 1200°
The process for creating aligned Co2Z is summarized in
Various permutations on the basic Co2Z composition were investigated with varying specific alignment processes as described below.
Three slurry samples of Co2Z type ferrite were prepared and pressed in the rotational die with three different pressings and magnetic field conditions. All samples were pressed at 800 psi. on the vertical ram. Condition one was to bring the magnetic field slowly to 1000 gauss with the die rotating at 6 rpm with a pressing time of 4 minutes (constant field the full press time). Condition two was bringing the field to 6000 gauss slowly and rotating the die at 6 rpm. The field was then turned off and on every 60 degrees during the complete pressing cycle. Condition three was to bring the field slowly to 6000 gauss rotating the die at 72 rpm. The field was left on during the complete pressing cycle.
Eight round Co2Z phase permutation disk samples were sintered and pressed under the following conditions:
Evaluations included 4 toroids for material parameter tests for each ceramic block as shown in
The easy axis toroids (AC and AE) and the hard axis toroids (AX and AY) from all 8 block permutations were placed in a coaxial test fixture and full 2-port S-parameter measurements were performed. This data produced four equations (real and imaginary part of S11 and S21) which were then used to solve for the four unknowns of interest (real and imaginary part of both permeability and permittivity). Permittivity generally had a real part of approximately 10 with very little loss in almost all cases. Permeability however varied greatly from sample to sample with the best results coming in for Block 4.
The test results for all 8 blocks are summarized in Table 1 and showed good uniformity in each block tested. The most aggressive calcine cycle of 2260 F, for 3 hour soak with the highest aligning field (6000 Gauss) in combination with a 72 RPM die rotation produced the best results. Also, as anticipated, the magnetic permeability values showed direct correlation with ceramic density. Co2Z permutation #4 was therefore chosen as the baseline material for use in our magnetically loaded AMC-antenna demonstration, which, again, is described later in this report.
Results for Co2Z Permutations
2260° F.-, 1 HR
2260° F.-, 1 HR
900° C. Anneal
2260° F.-3 HR
2260° F.-3 HR
900° C. Anneal
2260° F.-, 1 HR
2260° F.-3 HR
*Based On X-Ray Limiting Density Of 5.3 g/cm3
The magnetically loaded AMC geometry differs significantly from that of the standard thumbtack structure AMC, as illustrated in
The complexity of the design was necessary to achieve a surface wave bandgap over the entire high-impedance frequency band of the AMC—defined as the +/−90° reflection phase band. Certain specific aspects of the design are chosen to minimize loss and obtain the proper high impedance band, while others are primarily associated with TM surface wave cutoff, and still others principally affect the TE surface wave cutoff.
The TM surface wave cutoff is determined by the via spacing in the upper and lower spacer layer regions. For the upper spacer layer region 622 containing the Rohacell foam or other dielectric material, the vias 608 are placed at the center of every third FSS unit cell in the design example. However, in the lower region 620 containing the ferrite tiles 628, a much closer via spacing is required because of the high transverse permittivity and permeability, resulting in vias 634 placed at the center of each ferrite tile 628. In the final design, the vias are spaced 9 times closer together in the ferrite tile region 620 than in the Rohacell region 622.
The high permeability of the CO2Z perturbs the magnetic field components of the TE surface wave near the capacitive FSS layer and encourages energy to become bound to the surface. To counteract this effect, the magnetic material 620 should be as far as possible from the FSS layer 602, and its normal permeability should be minimized.
The magnetically loaded AMC design was validated with Microstripes, a commercially available full-wave simulation code. A simple effective medium model was first used in Microstripes to quickly assess the performance of the magnetically loaded AMC. The material properties of the ferrite layer used in the simulation were ∈r=25 and μ=13.7, and a relative dielectric constant of ∈r=1.07 was used for the foam spacer layer. The effective medium simulation predicted similar performance to the design goal so a full simulation of the complex AMC structure was performed.
The results of both simulations are shown in
These results are achieved in an AMC structure having approximately a one-inch thickness, which is approximately one fortieth of a free space wavelength (λ0/40) at the center of the band. This represents almost a 5-fold decrease in thickness required to achieve this bandwidth versus the non-magnetically loaded case. This is shown in
The geometry described above in conjunction with
The tiles were then placed within a guiding dielectric lattice above a metal ground plane. This is shown
The reflection phase of the magnetically loaded AMC was tested at commercial test facilities.
From the foregoing, it can be seen that the present invention provides an enhanced bandwidth AMC structure. The geometry is based upon a modification of the conventional AMC wherein the substrate is loaded with aligned, magnetic tiles. Theory predicts an aligned high-impedance and surface wave bandgap frequency band. In a demonstration article, reflection phase bandwidth was measured and agrees well with theory. It was not possible to measure the surface wave bandgap for magnetically-loaded AMC, simply because the electrical area of the unit fabricated (16.2″×16.2″) was too small (was insufficient to support a true surface wave).
A magnetically loaded AMC of the type described herein features broadband performance with a substantially reduced thickness relative to the conventional AMC. A thin, broadband AMC has application as a component in an electrically-thin conformal antenna system. Such a component has many applications in fixed, mobile, and portable communications systems as well as in military applications.
While a particular embodiment of the present invention has been shown and described, modifications may be made. Accordingly, it is therefore intended in the appended claims to cover such changes and modifications which follow in the true spirit and scope of the invention.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US4367474||Aug 5, 1980||Jan 4, 1983||The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army||Frequency-agile, polarization diverse microstrip antennas and frequency scanned arrays|
|US5872534||Oct 1, 1997||Feb 16, 1999||Fair-Rite Products Corporation||High frequency broadband absorption structures|
|US6147572||Jul 15, 1998||Nov 14, 2000||Lucent Technologies, Inc.||Filter including a microstrip antenna and a frequency selective surface|
|US6175337||Sep 17, 1999||Jan 16, 2001||The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army||High-gain, dielectric loaded, slotted waveguide antenna|
|US6483481||Nov 14, 2000||Nov 19, 2002||Hrl Laboratories, Llc||Textured surface having high electromagnetic impedance in multiple frequency bands|
|US6512494 *||Oct 4, 2000||Jan 28, 2003||E-Tenna Corporation||Multi-resonant, high-impedance electromagnetic surfaces|
|US6670932||Nov 1, 2000||Dec 30, 2003||E-Tenna Corporation||Multi-resonant, high-impedance surfaces containing loaded-loop frequency selective surfaces|
|US20030112186||Sep 17, 2002||Jun 19, 2003||Sanchez Victor C.||Broadband antennas over electronically reconfigurable artificial magnetic conductor surfaces|
|WO1999050929A1||Mar 29, 1999||Oct 7, 1999||The Regents Of The University Of California||Circuit and method for eliminating surface currents on metals|
|WO2001024313A1||Sep 29, 2000||Apr 5, 2001||Rockwell Science Center, Llc||Rectangular waveguide with high impedance wall structure|
|WO2001073892A2||Mar 28, 2001||Oct 4, 2001||Hrl Laboratories, Llc||An end-fire antenna or array on surface with tunable impedance|
|1||Ben A. Munk, "Frequency Selective Surfaces, Theory and Design," John Wiley and Sons, New York, Copyright 2000, pp. 26-62 and 279-314.|
|2||D. Sievenpiper, L. Zhang, and E. Yablonovitch, "High-impedance electromagnetic ground planes," IEEE Intl. MTT-S Symp., Jun. 13-19, 1999, 4 pages.|
|3||D. Sievenpiper, R. Broas, and E. Yablonovitch, "Antennas on high-impedance ground planes," IEEE Intl. MT-S Symp., Jun. 13-19, 1999, 4 pages.|
|4||Dan Sievenpiper, Lijun Zhang, Romulo F. Jimenez Broas, Nicolas G. Alexopoulos, and Eli Yablonovitch, "High-impedance electromagnetic surfaces with a forbidden frequency band," IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 47, No. 11, Nov. 1999, pp. 2059-2074.|
|5||Daniel F. Sievenpiper, "High-impedance electromagnetic surfaces," Ph.D. dissertation, UCLA electrical engineering department, submitted Jan. 1999, 161 pages.|
|6||G. Poilasne and E. Yablonovitch, "Matching antennas over high-impedance ground planes," URSI National Radio Science Meeting, Jul. 16-21, 2000, Salt Lake City, Utah, p. 312.|
|7||H. Y. D. Yang, R. Kim and D. R. Jackson, "Surface-Wave Band Gaps and Leaky Modes On Integrated Circuit Structures With Planer Periodic Metallic Elements", IEEE MTT-S Digest, Copyright 2000, pp. 1521-1524.|
|8||John C. Vardaxoglou, "Frequency Selective Surfaces: Analysis and Design," Research Studies Press Ltd, Copyright 1997, pp. 1-9, 18-73, 116-152 and 221-273.|
|9||Keisuke Kageyama et al., "Tunable Active Filters Having Multilayer Structure Using LTCC", IEEE, Copyright 2001, 4 pages.|
|10||L. Zhang, N. G. Alexopoulos, D. Sievenpiper, and E. Yablonovitch, "An efficient finite-element method for the analysis of photonic bandgap materials," IEEE Intl. MTT-S Symp., Jun. 13-19, 1999, 4 pages.|
|11||M. Rahman and M. A. Stuchly, "Equivalent circuit model of 2D microwave photonic bandgap structures," URSI National Radio Science Meeting, Jul. 16-21, 2000, Salt Lake City, Utah, p. 322.|
|12||R. B. Hwang, S. T. Peng and C. C. Chen, "Surface-Wave Suppression of Resonance-Type Periodic Structures", IEEE MTT-S Digest, Copyright 2000, pp. 1525-1528.|
|13||R. J. King and K.S. Park, "Synthesis of surface reactances using grounded pin bed structure," Electronics Letters, vol. 17, 1981, pp. 52-53.|
|14||R. J. King and S. W. Cho, "Surface Impedance Planes", Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Wisconsin, Copyright 2000, 16 pages.|
|15||R. M. Walser et al., "New smart materials for adaptive microwave signature control," Proceedings of the Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE), vol. 1916, 1993, pp. 128-134.|
|16||Ray. J. King, David. V. Theil, and Kwang S. Park, "The synthesis of surface reactance using an artificial dielectric," IEEE Trans. Antennas and Propagation, vol. AP-31, No. 3, May 1983, pp. 471-476.|
|17||Rodolfo E. Diaz, James T. Aberle, and William E. McKinzie III, "TM mode analysis of a Sievenpiper high-impedance reactive surface," IEEE Intl. Antennas and Propagation Symp., Jul. 16-21, 2000, Salt Lake City, Utah, pp. 1-21.|
|18||Ruey Bing Hwang and Song Tsuen Peng, "Guidance Characteristics of Two-Dimensionally Periodic Impedance Surface", IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 47, No. 12, Dec. 1999, pp. 2503-2511.|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US7595757 *||Apr 24, 2007||Sep 29, 2009||Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications Ab||Electrical connection elements provided in the AMC structure of an antenna arrangement|
|US7911407 *||Jun 12, 2008||Mar 22, 2011||Hrl Laboratories, Llc||Method for designing artificial surface impedance structures characterized by an impedance tensor with complex components|
|US7936310 *||Jul 18, 2008||May 3, 2011||Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba||High-impedance substrate|
|US8514147 *||Nov 22, 2007||Aug 20, 2013||Nec Tokin Corporation||EBG structure, antenna device, RFID tag, noise filter, noise absorptive sheet and wiring board with noise absorption function|
|US9281570 *||Aug 30, 2012||Mar 8, 2016||Broadcom Corporation||Programmable antenna having a programmable substrate|
|US9583253||Mar 10, 2014||Feb 28, 2017||Qualcomm Incorporated||Electric vehicle induction coil housing with interengagement structure for ferrite tile assemblies|
|US20080266179 *||Apr 24, 2007||Oct 30, 2008||Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications Ab||Electrical connection elements provided in the amc structure of an antenna arrangement|
|US20090021444 *||Jul 18, 2008||Jan 22, 2009||Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba||High-impedance substrate|
|US20100053013 *||Nov 22, 2007||Mar 4, 2010||Takayoshi Konishi||Ebg structure, antenna device, rfid tag, noise filter, noise absorptive sheet and wiring board with noise absorption function|
|US20130201068 *||Aug 30, 2012||Aug 8, 2013||Broadcom Corporation||Programmable antenna having a programmable substrate|
|CN104638375A *||Nov 13, 2013||May 20, 2015||深圳光启创新技术有限公司||Metamaterial panel, method for manufacturing same, antenna housing and method for manufacturing same|
|International Classification||H01Q1/38, H01Q15/00, H01F10/06|
|Cooperative Classification||H01F10/06, H01F10/205, H01Q15/008|
|Oct 7, 2004||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: TITAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION/AEROSPACE ELECTRONIC DIV
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:DIAZ, RODOLFO E.;SANCHEZ, VICTOR C.;MCKINZIE, WILLIAM E., III;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:015871/0645;SIGNING DATES FROM 20040816 TO 20040930
|Mar 26, 2012||REMI||Maintenance fee reminder mailed|
|Aug 12, 2012||LAPS||Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees|
|Oct 2, 2012||FP||Expired due to failure to pay maintenance fee|
Effective date: 20120812