|Publication number||US7412408 B1|
|Application number||US 10/886,410|
|Publication date||Aug 12, 2008|
|Filing date||Jul 7, 2004|
|Priority date||Jul 7, 2004|
|Publication number||10886410, 886410, US 7412408 B1, US 7412408B1, US-B1-7412408, US7412408 B1, US7412408B1|
|Inventors||Craig M. Palazzo|
|Original Assignee||Alticor Investments Inc.|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (28), Non-Patent Citations (4), Referenced by (4), Classifications (13), Legal Events (5)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
Due to the logistical complexities of unpacking and shipping, a main supplier of goods will often provide a discount if a buyer purchases case quantities of goods. For example, if a product comes twelve to a case, a supplier might give a five percent discount for each case purchased as opposed to the same number purchased as single quantities.
At the same time, some customers interested in purchasing goods are not allowed to purchase goods direct from the main supplier. Suppliers often restrict direct purchasers to those having a unique relationship with the supplier, such as those buying a large volume of goods or those with consistently high sales volumes. In those situations, the direct purchasers then may supply several other customers with goods.
The direct purchaser usually desires to purchase products in case quantities whenever possible in order to obtain a case discount offered by the supplier. However, if the direct purchaser supplies to a number of smaller or down-line customers, he may obtain several orders for products that are not in case quantities. Therefore, to obtain the case discount, the direct purchaser must consolidate the orders from the various customers in order to determine if a case discount is available. If the direct purchaser is processing numerous orders from many other customers, the direct purchaser may have great difficulty consolidating the order, and thus would not be able to take full advantage of case discounts, thereby increasing the cost of the goods to all customers.
A system and method for consolidating orders whereby the direct purchaser could automatically consolidate orders from other customers is thus highly desirable.
In order to clarify the terms used herein: “Supplier” refers to an entity, such as a manufacturer of products, that sells goods to direct purchasers, registered clients and members and to independent business owners. A “direct purchaser” is a purchaser authorized to buy all types of goods from the supplier. A direct purchaser may buy goods from the supplier to resell to its own customers who may be members of the general public or to distribute those goods to down-line customers of the supplier. The term “customers” refers to all parties who may purchase items, directly or indirectly, from the supplier including direct purchasers and down-line customers. Customers may have up-line or down-line relationships among one another, but as they relate to the supplier, they are all customers. A “down-line customer” is one who is not authorized to purchase all types of goods from the supplier. “Catalog items” are offered for sale through the supplier from other suppliers or manufacturers by virtue of a business relationship between the supplier and the other suppliers or manufacturers and are items sold by the supplier to all customers. “Non-catalog items” are items sold by the supplier to direct purchasers but not to down-line customers. “Buyer” refers to all customers.
The aforementioned problems are overcome by an order consolidation system. A buyer submits to the supplier's computer an order for goods. A computer program operating on the supplier's computers examines the list of ordered goods. For ordered goods that are catalog items, the supplier's computer approves that portion of the order for fulfillment. For ordered goods that are non-catalog items, the supplier's computer then determines if the buyer is a direct purchaser. If the buyer is a direct purchaser, the order is fulfilled. If the buyer is not a direct purchaser, then that portion of the order for the non-catalog goods is forwarded to a direct purchaser.
The direct purchaser may consolidate the order immediately with other orders, or may store the order for later consolidation. To consolidate the order, the direct purchaser enables a computer program running on its computer. The order is entered into the computer program. The program then determines the quantity of each non-catalog item ordered, and then adds that quantity to the quantity currently compiled by the direct purchaser. The program then examines whether the total quantity exceeds the case quantity for that item. If so, then the program determines the number of cases and the number of single quantities of the item necessary to fulfill the order. After all orders have been consolidated, the direct purchaser then submits the final consolidated order to the supplier.
Due to the automation of this task, the time and difficulty of performing the task is minimized. Further, the fulfillment of orders is streamlined, allowing for the direct purchaser to more timely provides the goods to buyers.
Upon receipt of the order from the server, the server determines if the order is from a direct purchaser. Step 104. If so, the server places the order. Step 106. If not, the server separates the order into catalog items and a non-catalog items. Step 108.
The order for the non-catalog orders is then placed with order fulfillment center 18. For non-catalog items, the server constructs an email regarding the non-catalog component of the order. Step 112. The email is then sent for processing to direct supplier computer 20. Step 114. As mentioned previously, various methods other than email could be used to provide this information to the direct supplier.
The order is received by direct purchaser computer 20. The order is retained at direct purchaser computer 20 until the direct purchaser desires to consolidate orders from various down-line customers and places the order with the supplier. The direct purchaser could consolidate its own orders as well.
In order to consolidate the orders, the direct purchaser first initiates the ordering program. The direct purchaser opens the email from the down-line customer. After reviewing the order, the direct purchaser can then consolidate the order. Step 116.
Order consolidation can be performed by several different methods. For example, the direct purchaser can drag and drop the order from a down-line customer onto the ordering program. Alternatively, the direct purchaser can manually enter the order items into the order.
If the item number is on the existing order, then the number of items within each case of that particular item is found. Step 208. The quantity ordered is compared to the number of items within a case. Step 210. If the quantity ordered is greater than the number of items within a case, then an appropriate number of cases are indicated as well as a corresponding number of “eaches” for the item. Step 212.
An “each” is a single unit of an item. “Eaches” refers to a quantity less than a case of a particular item. For example, if the number of items ordered is fifteen, and a case of those particular items is six, then the order would indicate an order of two cases along with three eaches. The case and the remaining eaches are then added to the order. Step 214. In this manner, the number of cases and eaches is set at the amount that allows for the greatest supplier discount.
In this manner, a direct supplier as well as the down-line customers buying from the direct supplier are provided the most favorable pricing available. (assuming the direct purchaser passes on the pro-rata savings to each customer. Thus, all of the supplier's customers will have access to better pricing. The process is also less time intensive than previous order consolidation methods.
In a Multi-Level Marketing (MLM) sales arrangement, independent business owners (IBOs) are business entities that are independent of the supplier, but may buy and resell products from the supplier. There are two types of fulfillment relationships between the IBOs and the supplier. The first IBO has a standard fulfillment relationship meaning that the first IBO is authorized to purchase catalog items directly from the supplier, but is not authorized to purchase non-catalog items directly from the supplier. The first IBO is a down-line customer of supplier as defined hereinabove. The second IBO has a direct fulfillment relationship with supplier. The direct fulfillment relationship authorizes the second IBO to purchase catalog and non-catalog items directly from the supplier. The first IBO must place order for non-catalog items through an IBO, such as the second IBO, having a direct fulfillment relationship with the supplier. The first IBO is a down-line customer of supplier as defined herein.
The first IBO initiates an order from a computer to the supplier's server. The order comprises three items. Items A and B are non-catalog items manufactured by supplier. Item C is a catalog item. Supplier's server determines that the first IBO is not authorized to order items A and B directly from supplier. The server accepts and supplier fulfills the order for item C. The server sends an e-mail message to the second IBO indicating that the first IBO has initiated an order for items A and B. The second IBO combines the quantity of items A and B ordered from the first IBO with the quantities of items A and B order from other down-line customers of the supplier through the second IBO and with the quantities of items A and B ordered by the second IBO for itself or its own customers.
The second IBO initiates the consolidation steps described herein and then places the order directly with the supplier via the supplier's server. The server verifies that the second IBO is a direct purchaser. The server accepts and supplier fulfills the order.
In an MLM sales arrangement, a first IBO was recruited by a second, IBO. The second IBO is a direct purchaser, the first IBO is a down-line customer of a supplier. The first IBO has an order comprising items A and B that are non-catalog items manufactured by supplier and item C that is a catalog item. The first IBO submits an order for item C via computer to supplier's server. Supplier's server accepts and supplier fulfills the order for item C. The first IBO communicates to the second IBO that the first IBO has an order for items A and B. The communication may be by electronic message, telephone message, in-person or by standing order. The second IBO combines the quantity of items A and B ordered from the first IBO with the quantities of items A and B order from other down-line customers of the supplier through the second IBO and with the quantities of items A and B ordered by the second IBO for itself or for its own customers. The second IBO initiates the consolidation steps described herein and then places the order directly with the supplier via supplier's server. The server verifies that the second IBO is a direct purchaser. The server accepts and supplier fulfills the order.
In a retail sales environment, a first customer submits an order for a quantity of a item A from a wholesale distributor. Wholesale distributor determines that first customer is not authorized to purchase products directly from wholesale distributor. Wholesale distributor notifies customer and a first direct purchaser geographically proximate to first customer of the product order. Direct purchaser consolidates the quantity of the item A ordered by the first customer with quantities of item A ordered from other different customers, and submits the consolidated order to wholesale distributor after the total quantity of item A meets or exceeds a quantity necessary to fill a case.
The above description is of the preferred embodiment. Various alterations and changes can be made without departing from the spirit and broader aspects of the invention as defined in the appended claims, which are to be interpreted in accordance with the principles of patent law including the doctrine of equivalents. Any references to claim elements in the singular, for example, using the articles “a,” “an,” “the,” or “said,” is not to be construed as limiting the element to the singular.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US5672039||Mar 4, 1994||Sep 30, 1997||Computer Aided Systems, Inc.||Order consolidation indexing system|
|US5794219||Feb 20, 1996||Aug 11, 1998||Health Hero Network, Inc.||Method of conducting an on-line auction with bid pooling|
|US5970475 *||Oct 10, 1997||Oct 19, 1999||Intelisys Electronic Commerce, Llc||Electronic procurement system and method for trading partners|
|US6167378||Jan 21, 1997||Dec 26, 2000||Webber, Jr.; Donald Gary||Automated back office transaction method and system|
|US6269343 *||Aug 18, 1999||Jul 31, 2001||Mobshop, Inc.||On-line marketing system and method|
|US6466919||Dec 20, 1999||Oct 15, 2002||Priceline.Com Incorporated||System and method for aggregating multiple buyers utilizing conditional purchase offers (CPOS)|
|US6571213 *||Dec 30, 1999||May 27, 2003||Pitney Bowes Inc.||Router utility for a parcel shipping system|
|US7136830 *||Jan 23, 2002||Nov 14, 2006||World Factory, Inc.||Method of producing, selling, and distributing articles of manufacture through the automated aggregation of orders and the visual representation of standardized shipping volumes|
|US20010032162 *||Dec 1, 2000||Oct 18, 2001||Alsberg Peter A.||Methods and systems for market clearance|
|US20010056379 *||Apr 10, 2001||Dec 27, 2001||Kazuya Fujinaga||Electronic commerce broking system|
|US20020001372||Aug 10, 1999||Jan 3, 2002||Ronald A. Katz||Method for buyer-seller-on-line commerce|
|US20020016744 *||Jan 26, 2001||Feb 7, 2002||Madoka Mitsuoka||Delivery management method and device, and delivery information service method|
|US20020046130 *||Jul 10, 2001||Apr 18, 2002||United Parcel Service, Inc.||Method and apparatus for communicating order entries in a network environment|
|US20020055878||Mar 22, 2001||May 9, 2002||Burton Peter A.||Methods and apparatus for on-line ordering|
|US20020065736 *||May 22, 2001||May 30, 2002||David Willner||Electronic procurement system|
|US20020095357||Oct 12, 2001||Jul 18, 2002||World Theatre, Inc., A North Carolina Corporation||System and method permitting customers to order selected products from a vast array of products offered by multiple participating merchants and related security applications|
|US20020143598||May 29, 2001||Oct 3, 2002||Scheer Robert H.||System for providing integrated supply chain management|
|US20020143692||Aug 21, 2001||Oct 3, 2002||Heimermann Scott Allen||Fully automated, requisition-driven, competing authorized suppliers, web site-based, real-time, reverse-auction, centralized e-procurement system for government, with bifurcated internal and external modules, requisition pooling, order formulation and management, consolidated in-bound shipment and distributed J.I.T. delivery, procurement-needs prediction, centralized catalog management and numerous additional features|
|US20020188499 *||Oct 29, 2001||Dec 12, 2002||Manugistics, Inc.||System and method for ensuring order fulfillment|
|US20020188524 *||Apr 17, 2002||Dec 12, 2002||Hidetaka Shimizu||Method for placing/receiving order using electronic mail|
|US20020188530||Jul 11, 2002||Dec 12, 2002||Lykes Bros., Inc.||System for managing orders and method of implementation|
|US20030023497||Mar 2, 2001||Jan 30, 2003||International Business Machines Corporation||System and method for managing internet trading networks|
|US20030023507||Apr 12, 2002||Jan 30, 2003||Elie Jankelewitz||System and method for reduced cost purchasing|
|US20030069775||Oct 10, 2001||Apr 10, 2003||Edward Jollie||Supplier planning information warehouse|
|US20030110054||May 3, 2002||Jun 12, 2003||Ingersoll-Rand Company||Method of and system for consolidating and managing purchases on behalf of an entity|
|US20030171998||Mar 11, 2002||Sep 11, 2003||Omnicell, Inc.||Methods and systems for consolidating purchase orders|
|US20030178481||Mar 21, 2003||Sep 25, 2003||Honda Of America Mfg., Inc.||Super cross-dock logistics system and method|
|US20030208415 *||Apr 30, 2003||Nov 6, 2003||Kousei Sano||Online shopping system, information processing apparatus and method, and information processing program recording medium|
|1||*||"A Look Through the PORTAL.(Internet/Web/Online Service Information)". Pickering, Chris. Software Magazine , 21 , 1 , 18 Feb. 2001. [recovered from Qialog Database on Apr. 21, 2008].|
|2||*||"Good things, smaller packages". Bowman, Robert J. World Trade v6n9 pp. 106-110. Oct. 1993. ISSN: 1054-8637 Journal Code: WLD Document Type: Journal article Language: English Length: 3 Pages. [recovered from Qialog Database on Apr. 21, 2008].|
|3||*||"Intranet helps Knight-Ridder centralize buys". Sliwa, Carol. Computerworld v32n1 pp. 53-54. Dec. 29, 1997-Jan. 5, 1998 CODEN: CMPWAB. ISSN: 0010-4841. Journal Code: COW. Document Type: Journal article Language: English Length: 2 Pages. [recovered from Qialog Database on Apr. 21, 2008].|
|4||*||"Quixtar Inc. Selects Endeca InFront with Guided Navigation for Interactive Online Search". Business Editors/High-Tech Writers. Business Wire. May 12, 2003 [receovered from Proquest database Jan. 15, 2006].|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US8504435 *||Feb 27, 2012||Aug 6, 2013||Fragmob, Llc||Group offers for direct sales system employing networked mobile computing devices|
|US20060085259 *||Oct 20, 2005||Apr 20, 2006||Nicholas Frank C||Method and system for providing cooperative purchasing over social networks|
|US20110307387 *||Jul 23, 2010||Dec 15, 2011||Opensky Project, Inc.||Method and System for Distributed Point of Sale Transactions|
|US20130054324 *||Feb 27, 2012||Feb 28, 2013||Jade Makani Roberge Charles||Group offers for direct sales system employing networked mobile computing devices|
|U.S. Classification||705/26.2, 705/28, 705/29|
|International Classification||G06F17/30, G06Q30/00|
|Cooperative Classification||G06Q10/0875, G06Q30/0605, G06Q30/06, G06Q10/087|
|European Classification||G06Q30/06, G06Q10/087, G06Q10/0875, G06Q30/0605|
|Oct 25, 2004||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: QUIXTAR, INC., MICHIGAN
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:PALAZZO, MR. CRAIG M.;REEL/FRAME:015283/0648
Effective date: 20041019
|Mar 3, 2008||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: ALTICOR INVESTMENTS INC., MICHIGAN
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:QUIXTAR INC.;REEL/FRAME:020590/0005
Effective date: 20080221
|Mar 31, 2009||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: AMWAY CORP., MICHIGAN
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:ALTICOR INVESTMENTS INC.;REEL/FRAME:022473/0552
Effective date: 20090330
|Jan 27, 2012||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|Jan 25, 2016||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 8