|Publication number||US7427920 B2|
|Application number||US 10/332,762|
|Publication date||Sep 23, 2008|
|Filing date||Jun 1, 2001|
|Priority date||Jun 6, 2000|
|Also published as||CA2421874A1, DE60118549D1, DE60118549T2, EP1289409A1, EP1289409B1, US20040036599, WO2001093754A1|
|Publication number||10332762, 332762, PCT/2001/2450, PCT/GB/1/002450, PCT/GB/1/02450, PCT/GB/2001/002450, PCT/GB/2001/02450, PCT/GB1/002450, PCT/GB1/02450, PCT/GB1002450, PCT/GB102450, PCT/GB2001/002450, PCT/GB2001/02450, PCT/GB2001002450, PCT/GB200102450, US 7427920 B2, US 7427920B2, US-B2-7427920, US7427920 B2, US7427920B2|
|Inventors||Keith Llewellyn Martin, Christopher S. Cox, Peter Douglas Biggins|
|Original Assignee||The Secretary Of State For Defence In Her Britannic Majesty's Government Of The United Kingdom Of Great Britain And Northern Ireland|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (19), Referenced by (4), Classifications (21), Legal Events (2)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
This application claims priority to Great Britain Application No. 0013610.1 filed on Jun. 6, 2000 and International Application No. PCT/GB01/02450 filed on Jun. 1, 2001 and published in English as International Publication No. WO 01/93754 A1 on Dec. 13, 2001, the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
This invention relates to a system for monitoring a live population, with data from the population being transferred to a remote station for analysis.
There are various situations where there is a need for the monitoring over a period of time of the state of a live population (whether human, animal or plant) and the location of the population members. An example is where emergency service personnel are dealing with hazardous incidents. The monitoring is on the whole done by the personnel using radio or telephone communications to provide the necessary information to another human. The information provided can be analysed manually or from input to a computer, so that appropriate action can be triggered, for example in a medical emergency to provide appropriate help to the correct location. This system relies on a human initiating the communication in the first place, and may not provide accurate medical or location information. It is also difficult to correlate information from different sources to provide an overall picture of the incident, to enable hazards to be predicted.
According to the present invention, a system for monitoring a live population by monitoring at least one member of the population includes local data collection means operative to derive data relating to the physical condition of the population member, a local processor for correlating and storing the physical condition data relative to time, means for transferring the stored data from the local processor to a remote data collection means, the remote data collection means also accessing data relating to the location of the population member relative to time, and including a main processor for facilitating analysis of the physical condition and location data for identification of unusual events.
As the physical condition data and location data are correlated with time, these data can be provided accurately to the remote data collection means. The data can then be analysed for unusual events, if necessary in conjunction with data from other sources, to predict and signal the unusual events, enabling appropriate action to be taken. The monitoring system therefore performs more efficiently.
The live population may be a population of humans, animals or plants. The data relating to physical condition picks up abnormal physical symptoms, due to disease as such, injury or other factors such as environmental conditions. Analysis of this data can then be used to identify unusual events, in terms of disease, or environmental conditions.
The local data collection means and local processor are preferably incorporated in a unit. A single unit may derive data relating to physical condition from more than one population member, but it is preferred that each population member has their own unit. This enables easy monitoring of each population member separately.
The local data collection means then preferably comprises a sensor attached to the population member, and controlled by the local processor. The processor may operate the sensor continuously or intermittently. This is particularly useful where the population consists of animals or plants, but may also be useful for humans. As operation of the unit is automatic, there is no room for human error.
Alternatively, the local data collection means may comprise a manually-operable device, into which data relating to physical condition is input. Clearly, this can only be operated by humans, but is useful for deriving data from more than one population member.
Conveniently the means for transferring the stored data comprises telecommunication means, for sending radio signals or the like. A telecommunication means is preferably associated with each local data collection means. It is preferably incorporated in a unit with the local data collection means and the local processor, and is controlled by the local processor.
The operation of the local processor is preferably programmable. The telecommunication means may be operative to receive data to alter the programming of the local processor.
The unit preferably contains a power source such as batteries, operated under the control of the local processor.
Preferably the unit includes a location means operative to derive data relating to the location of the population member, and the local processor then correlates and stores the physical condition data and the location data relative to time. This provides particularly accurate physical condition and location data.
The local processor then controls operation of the location means as well, so that it is operated continuously or intermittently.
Alternatively the location means may be separate from the unit. The location means may transmit the location data to the remote data collection means. The unit may transmit the physical condition data to the remote data collection means via the location means. The location means may then correlate the physical condition and location data relative to time.
The remote data collection means may simply comprise a central computer station for receiving, storing and analysing the data. Alternatively it may comprise a central station and a number of intermediate stations which receive the data from one or more units, and relay it to the central station for storage and analysis. With this arrangement, the location means may be at the intermediate station, which correlates the location and physical condition data relative to time, and relays it to the central station. The data is preferably stored at the central station in a computer database.
The sensor for a human or animal may derive data relating to several states of the body, including pulse rate, temperature, oxyhaemoglobin, carboxyhaemoglobin and cytochrome oxidase. Monitoring is preferably by a non-invasive sensor. This may be of a near infra-red spectroscopy (NIRS) type or any other suitable type. Sensors for plants may derive data relating to temperature, water content and the like.
The location data is preferably derived from a global positioning satellite system.
Embodiments of the invention are illustrated, by way of example only, in the accompanying drawings, in which:—
The population monitoring system of
The unit 1 is shown in more detail in
The sensor 4 is a non-invasive sensor of the near infra-red spectroscopy (NIRS) type. It has two sensor pads 8 adapted to be attached to the body 2 at spaced locations, such as the head and the arm. The sensor pads measure oxygen levels in the body 2, using near infra-red spectroscopy to monitor the levels of chromophores, whose absorbence is oxygen-dependent. Background interference from other tissues is compensated for by measuring changes in absorbence. The use of multiple wavelengths of light allows monitoring of changes in oxyhaemoglobin, carboxyhaemoglobin and cytochrome oxidase, which are all chemical states of the body relating to oxygenation levels and thus indicate the medical condition of the body 2. The sensor 4 also measures temperature and pulse data. The sensor pads 8 are non-invasively attached to the body 2 by detachable means such as tape or a band and by wires to the main part of the unit. The main part of the unit 1 is attached to the body 2 or the wearer's clothing. It can be made small and lightweight.
The main part of the unit 1 also houses the location means 5, comprising a global positioning monitor 9 which receives spatial co-ordinates from a satellite 10, as well as the time.
The data from the sensor 4 and the location means 5 is transmitted to the local processor 6, which correlates and stores it in relation to time, in a suitable electronic memory. The processor 6 is a programmable microprocessor unit adapted to operate the sensor and the location means as required. Thus, the sensor and location means may be operated continuously or intermittently. The unit 1 also includes a power source in the form of a battery 11, and the local processor 6 is also programmed to act as a power management system. Further the local processor 6 operates the telecommunication means 7 periodically to send the stored data to the remote station 3. The telecommunication means 7 sends the data by a radio signal, either directly or using a satellite 12 as a communications channel. The data could instead be transferred by telephone (terrestrial or satellite) or cable, or even manually.
The remote station 3 comprises a data collection computer 16 including a database in which the data is stored for analysis. The computer includes a main processor for analysing the physical condition and location data for unusual events and providing a signal on the occurrence of an unusual event. The computer 16 may also have access to other, collateral, data, to assist in the identification of unusual events. The other data may be meteorological, geographic, pollution, medical or demographic databases.
The analysis of unusual events is based on the data from the units 1 or 1′ and the collateral databases, chosen as required according to the expected events. The analysis uses a set of rules describing the signature of an event as a departure from a normal background level of one or more parameters. The rules assign relative significance values to the events, to enable their significance to be evaluated singly and in combination, particularly where they arise from different databases. The rules assign an overall significance value, as a probability that an unusual event has occurred. The rules may vary according to the parameters used.
An example which is useful in practice is the analysis of disease events from medical data, time, location and meteorological data. One such analysis of a particular infectious disease has been carried out retrospectively. The rules looked at the occurrence of the disease as a function of time, location (by postal area in UK) and the meteorological record.
A first rule looked at the number of cases of the disease in relation to time and meteorological conditions, to predict the number of cases which would occur in a given future time period. The rule was modified if the predicted number of cases varied significantly from the actual number.
A second rule looked at the location of the cases, that is the spatial distribution in the postal areas. An infectious disease is expected to form clusters of cases, and the degree of clustering can be used to test the randomness of the spatial distribution to determine a departure from the expected distribution.
A third rule looked for a correlation between the spatial distribution of the cases and the prevailing wind, at a given time. The rule was modified according to any correlation.
Several instances of unusual events (for example, the disease becoming epidemic) were detected by the three rules.
The monitoring system has also been used with the unit 1′ of
Thus, the monitoring system can be used for populations, to signal unusual events. While it has been described in terms of monitoring a population of humans it would also be used to monitor populations of animals or even plants. When monitoring plants, data relating to location will be input to, or otherwise available to the central data collection computer 15, as global positioning will not be a requirement.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3972320 *||Aug 12, 1974||Aug 3, 1976||Gabor Ujhelyi Kalman||Patient monitoring system|
|US5652570||Oct 16, 1995||Jul 29, 1997||Lepkofker; Robert||Individual location system|
|US5729205||Mar 7, 1997||Mar 17, 1998||Hyundai Motor Company||Automatic transmission system of an emergency signal and a method thereof using a driver's brain wave|
|US5738102 *||Jul 31, 1996||Apr 14, 1998||Lemelson; Jerome H.||Patient monitoring system|
|US5771001||Nov 18, 1996||Jun 23, 1998||Cobb; Marlon J.||Personal alarm system|
|US5874897||Dec 26, 1996||Feb 23, 1999||Dragerwerk Ag||Emergency-reporting system for rescue operations|
|US5993386 *||Jul 15, 1997||Nov 30, 1999||Ericsson; Arthur Dale||Computer assisted method for the diagnosis and treatment of illness|
|US6057758 *||May 20, 1998||May 2, 2000||Hewlett-Packard Company||Handheld clinical terminal|
|US6102856 *||Feb 12, 1998||Aug 15, 2000||Groff; Clarence P||Wearable vital sign monitoring system|
|US6113539 *||Jan 27, 1999||Sep 5, 2000||K.E.R. Associates, Inc.||Physical monitoring system for feedlot animals|
|US6198394 *||Dec 5, 1996||Mar 6, 2001||Stephen C. Jacobsen||System for remote monitoring of personnel|
|US6218122 *||Jun 16, 1999||Apr 17, 2001||Rosetta Inpharmatics, Inc.||Methods of monitoring disease states and therapies using gene expression profiles|
|US6287254 *||Nov 2, 1999||Sep 11, 2001||W. Jean Dodds||Animal health diagnosis|
|US6402691 *||Sep 20, 2000||Jun 11, 2002||Herschel Q. Peddicord||In-home patient monitoring system|
|DE19848229A1||Oct 20, 1998||Jun 24, 1999||Ditec Gmbh||Medical data recording and transmission device|
|EP0976360A1||Jul 23, 1999||Feb 2, 2000||Hitachi, Ltd.||Resource-saving event-driven monitoring system and method|
|GB2205648A||Title not available|
|GB2285135A||Title not available|
|JPH1117880A||Title not available|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US7993266 *||Feb 26, 2003||Aug 9, 2011||Lawrence Livermore National Security, Llc||Early detection of contagious diseases|
|US8945009 *||Jun 12, 2008||Feb 3, 2015||Robert Bosch Heathcare Systems, Inc.||Remote health monitoring system|
|US20070180140 *||Dec 4, 2006||Aug 2, 2007||Welch James P||Physiological alarm notification system|
|US20080269571 *||Jun 12, 2008||Oct 30, 2008||Brown Stephen J||Remote health monitoring system|
|U.S. Classification||340/573.1, 340/601, 340/602, 340/286.07, 340/539.26, 340/539.1, 600/300, 340/539.12, 600/301, 340/539.28|
|International Classification||G08B23/00, A61B5/00|
|Cooperative Classification||A61B5/0022, A61B5/1112, A61B5/002, A61B2560/0462, A61B2560/0242, A61B5/6814, G06F19/3493|
|European Classification||A61B5/11M, A61B5/00B|
|Sep 12, 2003||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: SECRETARY OF STATE FOR DEFENCE, THE, UNITED KINGDO
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:MARTIN, KEITH LLEWELLYN;COX, CHRISTOPHER STAFFORD;BIGGINS, PETER DOUGLAS;REEL/FRAME:014584/0976;SIGNING DATES FROM 20030122 TO 20030204
|Mar 15, 2012||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4