|Publication number||US7438319 B2|
|Application number||US 11/672,595|
|Publication date||Oct 21, 2008|
|Filing date||Feb 8, 2007|
|Priority date||Feb 9, 2006|
|Also published as||US20070182147|
|Publication number||11672595, 672595, US 7438319 B2, US 7438319B2, US-B2-7438319, US7438319 B2, US7438319B2|
|Inventors||Bruce Russell Lee Cooper, Frank Allen|
|Original Assignee||Bruce Russell Lee Cooper, Ford Frank Allen|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (13), Referenced by (9), Classifications (5), Legal Events (5)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
This invention concerns roll over protection devices (ROPS) for tractors of smaller scale.
ROPS have been used to protect tractor drivers from crushing injuries caused during tractor roll over accidents. A common type of ROPS used consists of an inverted U-shaped bar having two uprights joined at their upper ends by a crossmember and fixed to a pair of brackets at their lower ends. The brackets are either attached to existing holes in the rear axle or with the use of clamp plates and bolts, are clamped around the rear axle housing. Bolts are then passed through the apertures and into the existing holes or passed through the lower clamp plate so as to fasten the brackets to the rear axle housing of the tractor and thereby mount the ROPS onto the tractor for use.
This type of ROPS arrangement suffers in that it may only fit tractors of a specific model, whereas tractors come in a large range of models. Thus it may be difficult and expensive for tractor owners to find and ascertain ROPS which correctly fit their tractors, and for ROPS manufacturers to produce a large variety of sizes and models of ROPS required to accommodate the differing nature of the tractors.
The large range of ROPS required, along with the size and shape of this type of ROPS, can also be problematic during transportation thereby leading to increased freighting costs. Furthermore, the process of drilling holes in the rear axle can be inefficient and improperly performed.
Thus there is a need for a ROPS which can be mounted on to a variety of tractors of differing models and sizes. There is also a need for a ROPS which can be efficiently freighted.
Drivers of standard size tractors are able to fit a ROPS for a large range of tractors. This market is well developed and many models can be purchased with original equipment or retrofitted equipment. Australian and international standards exist for such bars.
Operators of hobby farms and market gardens prefer small scale tractors with a mass 400-2000 kg. These have a differential housing at the rear wheels and the housing incorporates the three point lift linkage for supporting implements.
Additionally the housing has threaded bores for the reception of attachment bolts to permit the use of specialised equipment. Several brands of compact tractors are popular and each brand includes a variety of models. The existence of prevailing standards means that if an owner wishes to comply ROPS with the law, each model must have an individually designed ROPS.
The ROPS comprises a hoop and a fabricated bracket which connects the hoop to the tractor such that upon roll over the hoop ensures that there is clearance between the tractor and the ground thereby reducing the risk of crushing injury. The ROPS must be carefully designed and tested to ensure adequate energy absorption is achieved, without excessive deflection, in compliance with the relevant standards. The bores in the bracket must register with the threaded bores in the housing and the parts of the bracket must not impede the movement of the links of the three point linkage.
The cost of safety equipment is unwelcome to operators. The costs incurred by manufacturers in the design of the variety of individual components and the costs to dealers who would have to stock the variety of components would generate prices which would be a barrier to the adoption of the roll protection bars on small tractors.
Operators do not want components which are heavy to lift and difficult to fit. The drivers require a component which will withstand the force of roll over but which will not impose loads which would damage the housing to which the component is bolted.
Currently it is known to attach a ROPS of inverted U-shape to the axles on both sides of the differential housing by means of pairs of brackets using clamping bolts and nuts. The clamping operation provides its own clamping sites. U.S. Pat. No. 4,158,460 shows this type of attachment.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,503,430 describes a ROPS wherein the two ends are narrower than the portion of the bar arranged above the drivers seat and the ends are bolted directly to the transmission case between the rear wheels. This type of fitting relies upon the manufacturers provision (Kubota) of twin connection sites for the bar ends.
The apparatus aspect of the invention provides a ROPS assembly for a tractor comprising a driver protecting part, a coupling for the part, a separable mounting bracket capable of rigid connection to the coupling, the bracket defining multiple fastener apertures for registering with pre-existing attachment sites of a specific model of tractor.
When a person protecting part is a hoop, the hoop may have a lug extending there from which is attachable by screw fasteners to the bracket. The lug may be a flat plate or channel.
The bracket may have a lower portion for attachment to the transmission housing of the tractor and an upper portion for connection to the lug of the hoop. This construction allows a hoop of substantially standard configuration to be sold with a specialised bracket.
The upper portion of the bracket may be a plate or channel with bolt/screw bores to mate with corresponding bores in the lug.
The lower portion may have bores or slots specifically located to utilise existing threaded bores in the differential housing. It is preferable in terms of load resistance if the upper and lower portions are of channel section.
Parts of the upper and lower portions may lie in mutually parallel planes being connected by a bridge member so as to give the bracket a modified Z-shape. The bridge may be a box section component welded to the plates, channels or other configuration.
Preferably the hoop lug is of channel section and the upper portion of the bracket is of channel section, one section lying within the other.
The lower portion may be a modified channel for some models. The portion may comprise a flat plate with a pair of mutually spaced upstanding flanges welded to the plate face. The plate will have bores or slotted holes for the reception of fixing bolts.
The whole component may be made of mild steel.
One embodiment is now described with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
A compact KUBOTA™ tractor 2 has a rearward extending transmission section 4 which terminates in a transmission housing 6. Drivers seat 8 is located between the rear wheels 10.
The ROPS consists of a bracket 12 bolted to the end of the differential housing and a separate tubular hoop 14 fixed to the bracket. The hoop is of standard size and shape for all tractors of this mass range, being 895H×760Wmm. The hoop is made of steel tube.
Referring now to
The coupling 20 is central and is made from 6 mm mild steel. The spacing of the four bolt holes is the same for all small tractor ROPS according to this invention.
Referring now to
The width of the upper channel 26 is slightly larger than the coupling channel 20 allowing the two to nest. The upper channel has four bores 30 which register with the bolt holes 20.
The mouth of the bridge is modified to receive the upper channel in that the wall 32 projects into the bridge. The lower channel 32 is the part which is bolted to the transmission housing and it is this part which is designed for specific tractor models. A variety of holes 34 and slots 36 are positioned to register with the threaded bores 38 in the housing 40 of a range of tractor models (see
The bracket allows full use of the hydraulic lift arms 48 and sets the hoop 14 to the rear of the seat while still giving full roll over protection.
We have found the advantages of the above embodiment to be:
1. The hoops which are made of uniform size are convenient to pack in a stack for freighting.
2. The brackets are made by bending or fabrication sharing some common pieces but the lower channel or plate can be easily modified to any array of bores and slots.
3. The dealer need only stock the selection of brackets for the models popular in his area.
4. The cost is affordable, whereas the cost of a large variety of one piece components would not be.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3791668 *||Jun 14, 1972||Feb 12, 1974||Caterpillar Tractor Co||Roll-over protection structure with deformable legs|
|US4032187 *||Dec 22, 1975||Jun 28, 1977||Allis-Chalmers Corporation||Energy absorbing joint for protective frame|
|US4049294 *||Dec 22, 1975||Sep 20, 1977||Allis-Chalmers Corporation||Narrow base protective frame|
|US4158460||Sep 7, 1977||Jun 19, 1979||Susan Beck White||Roll bar safety frame for a tractor|
|US4159835 *||Dec 12, 1977||Jul 3, 1979||Allis-Chalmers Corporation||Vehicle protective frame with internal reinforcing members|
|US5042835 *||Jul 9, 1990||Aug 27, 1991||J. I. Case Company||Roll over protection apparatus|
|US5086858 *||Dec 3, 1990||Feb 11, 1992||Kawasaki Jukogyo Kabushiki Kaisha||Air intake system for utility vehicle|
|US5129676 *||Feb 19, 1991||Jul 14, 1992||Ford New Holland, Inc.||Counterbalanced telescopic rollbar for tractors|
|US5503430 *||Apr 22, 1994||Apr 2, 1996||Kubota Corporation||Rollover protection system for a working vehicle|
|US5779272 *||Nov 7, 1996||Jul 14, 1998||Case Corporation||Roll-over protection system|
|US5839758 *||Mar 3, 1997||Nov 24, 1998||New Holland North America, Inc.||Roll-over protective system for tractors|
|US5971434 *||Mar 5, 1997||Oct 26, 1999||Case Corporation||Latch mechanism for a protective structure of a skid steer loader|
|US6237952 *||Sep 23, 1998||May 29, 2001||Caterpillar Inc.||Rollover protective structure for a mobile machine|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US7677599 *||Aug 8, 2008||Mar 16, 2010||Bomag Gmbh||Swiveling roll bar|
|US7922201||Feb 19, 2010||Apr 12, 2011||Bomag Gmbh||Swiveling roll bar|
|US8029019||Jan 29, 2009||Oct 4, 2011||Deere & Company||ROPS mounting assembly|
|US8905434||Oct 18, 2012||Dec 9, 2014||Excel Industries, Inc.||Rollover protection apparatus|
|US9327670||Nov 13, 2014||May 3, 2016||Excel Industries, Inc.||Rollover protection apparatus|
|US9616837||Jun 3, 2015||Apr 11, 2017||Excel Industries, Inc.||Forward folding roll bar assembly|
|US20080309058 *||Aug 8, 2008||Dec 18, 2008||Bomag Gmbh||Swiveling Roll Bar|
|US20100140911 *||Feb 19, 2010||Jun 10, 2010||Bomag Gmbh||Swiveling Roll Bar|
|US20100187799 *||Jan 29, 2009||Jul 29, 2010||Keith Schmidt||Rops mounting assembly|
|U.S. Classification||280/756, 296/102|
|Dec 30, 2008||CC||Certificate of correction|
|Apr 23, 2012||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|Jun 3, 2016||REMI||Maintenance fee reminder mailed|
|Oct 21, 2016||LAPS||Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees|
|Dec 13, 2016||FP||Expired due to failure to pay maintenance fee|
Effective date: 20161021