|Publication number||US7454786 B2|
|Application number||US 10/401,334|
|Publication date||Nov 18, 2008|
|Filing date||Mar 27, 2003|
|Priority date||Mar 27, 2003|
|Also published as||CN1777852A, CN100530027C, EP1614013A1, US8572694, US20040193909, US20080295147, WO2004086201A1|
|Publication number||10401334, 401334, US 7454786 B2, US 7454786B2, US-B2-7454786, US7454786 B2, US7454786B2|
|Inventors||David Yu Chang, Ching-Yun Chao|
|Original Assignee||International Business Machines Corporation|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (31), Non-Patent Citations (4), Referenced by (7), Classifications (10), Legal Events (7)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
1. Technical Field
The present invention relates in general to a system and method for integrating security roles across application boundaries. More particularly, the present invention relates to a system and method for expanding a security role by mapping an upstream security role to a downstream security role.
2. Description of the Related Art
Computer systems use various techniques for user authorization. A computer system typically authenticates and authorizes a user when the computer system receives a request from the user. For example, a user may access his bank account information and a banking application proceeds through a series of steps to authenticate and authorize the user, such as requesting a user identifier and a password from the user. The computer system may also require authorization to access downstream applications. Using the example described above, the banking application (i.e. upstream application) may call a downstream application to retrieve account information corresponding to the user's request whereby the downstream application requires user identification information in order to grant access.
Java 2 Enterprise Edition (J2EE) includes a security role-based access control mechanism for user request authorizations. A security role may be viewed as a collection of Enterprise Java Bean (EJB) method permissions along with read/write access permissions to URL pages. EJB beans and URL pages are packaged together into a J2EE application in order to build a functionality set that solves a business problem. System administrators map individual user identifiers as well as group identifiers to each security role in order to provide each user and group with required permissions to access business functions.
A challenge found with mapping users to applications, however, is that different developers or vendors create separate J2EE applications that are integrated into a larger business application. Security roles are typically defined within an application's boundary that, in turn, allows business applications to be developed in a modular fashion. For example, a business operation may be partitioned into a set of components and different groups may develop the components separately. A group that develops a particular module may not be aware of users that require access from other modules.
Furthermore, a challenge found with manually managing user-to-role mapping in a modular system for downstream applications is that it becomes non-trivial and complex. For example, a workflow user request may be handled by a number of J2EE applications. When this occurs, the user's identity is mapped to security roles corresponding to each application in order to provide the user with access.
What is needed, therefore, is a system and method that automatically maps an upstream application's security roles to a downstream application's required security role and, conversely, maps downstream application security roles to upstream security roles. Moreover, what is needed is a system and method to more effectively provide users with access across application boundaries.
It has been discovered that the aforementioned challenges are resolved by expanding an upstream security role to include a collection of permissions of a downstream application. The upstream security role is expanded by adding an upstream security role identifier to a downstream application's role-mapping table or by adding upstream user-to-role mappings to a downstream application's role-mapping table. When an upstream security role is expanded, a user assigned to the upstream security role automatically has access to role-mapped downstream applications.
Processing identifies role-mapping requirements between an upstream security role and one or more downstream security roles. The upstream security role corresponds to an upstream application and the downstream security role corresponds to a downstream application. The upstream application and downstream application may be located on a single server or each application may be located on separate servers and communicate over a computer network, such as a LAN or the Internet.
The upstream security role is mapped to the downstream security role using an upstream security role identifier. The upstream security role identifier is included in one of the downstream security role's authorization table entries. Once the upstream security role identifier is included in one of the downstream security role's authorization table entries, the upstream application may send a request to the downstream application that includes a user identifier and a user's assigned upstream security roles. The downstream application grants access to the user by matching the user's assigned upstream security roles included in the request with one of the downstream security role's authorization table entries.
An upstream security role may also be mapped to a downstream security role by adding the upstream security role user-to-role mappings (i.e. user identifiers and group identifiers) to a downstream application's role-mapping table (e.g. authorization table entries). Once processing adds the upstream security role user-to-role mappings to the downstream application's role-mapping table, the upstream application may send a request to the downstream application that includes a user identifier without sending assigned upstream security role identifiers. The downstream application grants access by matching the user identifier included in the request with one of the downstream security role authorization table entries.
The foregoing is a summary and thus contains, by necessity, simplifications, generalizations, and omissions of detail; consequently, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the summary is illustrative only and is not intended to be in any way limiting. Other aspects, inventive features, and advantages of the present invention, as defined solely by the claims, will become apparent in the non-limiting detailed description set forth below.
The present invention may be better understood, and its numerous objects, features, and advantages made apparent to those skilled in the art by referencing the accompanying drawings. The use of the same reference symbols in different drawings indicates similar or identical items.
The following is intended to provide a detailed description of an example of the invention and should not be taken to be limiting of the invention itself. Rather, any number of variations may fall within the scope of the invention which is defined in the claims following the description.
Client 100 sends request 105 to server 115 through computer network 110, such as the Internet. For example, client 100 may wish to check a bank account balance which is accessed using server 115. Request 105 includes user data 107 that server 115 uses to authenticate and authorize client 100. For example, user data 107 may include a user identifier, a password, a digital certificate, or other information used to authenticate and authorize the client.
Server 115 includes upstream application 120 which interfaces with client requests. Using the example described above, upstream application 120 may be an online banking application which allows users to check bank account balances, deposit funds, and withdraw funds. Upstream application 120 includes web module 122 and EJB (Enterprise Java Bean) module 125. Web module 122 provides a user interface to client 100 (e.g. web page) and also authenticates client 100 using client 100's authentication data included in request 105 (e.g. a digital certificate). Once web module 122 authenticates client 100, web module 122 calls EJB module 125 to further process request 105.
Enterprise Java Bean (EJB) modules authorize a user's request based upon the user's assigned security roles. Using the example described above, EJB module 125 authorizes client 100 to check bank account balances if client 100 is assigned a “CheckBalance” role. In the example shown in
EJB module 125 determines whether to grant access to client 100 by comparing client 100's user identifier included in user data 107 with upstream authorization table entries 162, 165, and 167.
Once EJB module 125 grants access to client 100, EJB module 125 determines that it should call downstream application 140 to handle the request. Using the example described above, the online banking application determines that it should call a naming space management application in order to look-up user account information from a naming space. EJB module 125 sends request 130 to downstream application 140. Request 130 includes user identifier 135 and roles 137. User identifier 135 identifies client 100 and roles 137 includes identifiers corresponding to client 100's upstream security roles, such as upstream security role 160.
In one embodiment, downstream application 140 may be located on a separate server and roles 137 is included in a security context that is sent to the server hosting the downstream application over a computer network, such as a LAN or the Internet.
Downstream application 140 includes EJB module 145 which receives and analyzes request 130. EJB module 145 determines that client 100 requires a particular security role assignment in order for EJB module 145 to grant access. Using the example described above, EJB module 145 grants access to look-up the user's bank account information from the naming space if the requester is assigned downstream security role 175. EJB module 145 accesses downstream authorization table 170 that includes downstream security role 175. EJB module 145 compares user identifier 135 and roles 137 with downstream authorization table entries 180, 185, and 190. Downstream authorization table entries 180 and 185 include downstream subjects that are user identifiers whereas downstream authorization table entry 190 includes an upstream security role identifier corresponding to upstream security role 160. EJB module 145 determines that the upstream security role included in roles 137 matches the upstream security role identifier included in downstream authorization table entry 190 and grants access to client 100.
In one embodiment, a computer system may map upstream subjects associated with a particular upstream security role to a downstream authorization table in lieu of adding an upstream security role identifier to the downstream authorization table (see
Since downstream authorization table 270 was user-to-role mapped to upstream security role 260, request 230 does not included client 200's assigned upstream security roles whereas FIG. 1's request 130 included client 100's assigned upstream security roles (e.g. roles 137).
A server accesses upstream authorization table 300 which includes security role 305 and security role 315 during a role-to-role mapping process. Authorization table entries 310 include entries corresponding to security role 305 and authorization table entries 320 include entries corresponding to security role 315.
The server accesses downstream authorization table 325 during role-to-role mapping and selects upstream security role 305 to map to downstream security role 330. Downstream security role 330 includes authorization table entries 335 and 340. The server adds authorization table entry 345 to downstream security role 330 in order to “role-map” upstream security role 305 to downstream security role 330. Downstream authorization entry 345 includes an upstream security role identifier corresponding to upstream security role 305. Downstream security role 330 is now configured so a downstream application grants access to users that are assigned upstream security role 305 (see
A server accesses upstream authorization table 350 which includes security role 355 and security role 365 during a role-to-role mapping process. Authorization table entries 360 include a collection of user-to-role mappings corresponding to security role 355. Each entry in a user-to-role mapping table includes a user, a group, or a security role identifier that has been assigned to upstream security role 355. The server accesses downstream authorization table 370 and selects downstream security role 375 to role-map upstream security role 355.
Downstream security role 375 includes authorization table entries 385 and 390. Authorization table entries 395 include new entries resulting from upstream security role 355's user-to-role mappings to downstream security role 375. Downstream security role 375 is now configured so the corresponding downstream application grants authorization to users that are assigned upstream security role 355 (see
An application developer is aware that his application (i.e. upstream application) requires access service from other applications (i.e. downstream applications). Therefore, the application developer defines security role references to the downstream applications that his upstream application requires access (step 400). The application developer adds a security-role-reference extension to his code which defines a symbolic role name that may be used to reference security roles in downstream applications.
Since actual downstream security role names may not be known during an upstream application's assembly time, a security-role-reference element provides an indication that an upstream security role should be mapped to a downstream security role. Actual downstream security role names may be resolved during the upstream application's deployment phase (see below for further details). A “security-role-reference” may be defined as an extension in a J2EE deployment descriptor. The “security-role-reference” may be added to EJB modules and Web modules, and defined as follows:
The element may include an optional “description” to describe the downstream application to provide role-to-role mapping guidance to an application deployer during a binding process (see below for further details regarding binding process).
The application developer may add another extension to the J2EE deployment descriptor to allow a bind between a downstream security role and the security-role-reference. For example, an application is uniquely identified by a cell name and its application name. A cell includes a number of application servers and is a basic unit for setting up a security policy. A security role is uniquely identified by a three-tuple, such as:
A deployer, when installing a new application, resolves security-role-references by adding an element in into a binding extension to the J2EE deployment descriptor as follows:
The above statement binds a unique role name (a three-tuple) with the security-role-reference name defined by the assembler (step 450). An access control security policy that assigns users and user groups to security roles can be defined by the following element:
The security-role-name represents a security role defined for the downstream application. A subject may be a unique user identifier, a group identifier, a special subject, or a security-role-reference name. The security-role-reference name, when specified, means that the security role of a downstream application is assigned to the application.
An authorization table adheres to an application boundary and includes one or more authorization elements, one per security role. Depending on an administrator's preference, the server performs one of two approaches at runtime (step 490, see
In the first approach, a server looks-up security roles that are granted to a specified user by the intended application when authenticating that user. Security role attributes are added into the user's security credentials and are propagated to downstream applications or servers when sending downstream calls to downstream applications. New security roles that are granted to the user by the downstream application are also added to the user's security credentials.
In the second approach, the upstream application's role name that is in a downstream application's authorization table is replaced at runtime by the upstream application's authorization policy (i.e., user, group, special subject assignment). The security-role-binding element in the upstream application indicates that a security runtime should update the downstream application's authorization table whenever the upstream application's user-to-role binding is modified.
To avoid circular dependency, security role equivalency is implemented. If a security role is assigned to another security role and vice versa, then the two security roles are identified as equivalent. Once two security roles are identified as equivalent roles, processing ensures that the two corresponding authorization tables are identical. Role equivalence may also be applied to three or more security roles that are assigned to one another in a circular fashion. For example, role 1 is assigned to role 2, role 2 is assigned to role 3, and role 3 is assigned to role 1. In this example, all three roles are identified as equivalent roles.
A determination is made as to whether the upstream application includes role-mapping requirements (decision 520). Processing identifies role-mapping requirements by analyzing extensions included in the upstream application (see
If the upstream application does not include role-mapping requirements, decision 520 branches to “No” branch 522 whereupon the server loads the upstream application at step 530, and processing ends at 535. On the other hand, if the upstream application includes role-mapping requirements, decision 520 branches to “Yes” branch 528 whereupon processing selects a first role-mapping requirement included in the upstream application (step 540). The role-mapping requirement identifies an upstream security role to be mapped to a downstream security role.
The upstream security role includes upstream subjects (i.e. user identifiers, group identifiers, etc.) which are stored in an upstream authorization table, such as upstream authorization table store 555. The downstream security role includes downstream subjects which are stored in a downstream authorization table, such as downstream authorization table store 560. Upstream authorization table store 555 and downstream authorization table store 560 may be stored on a non-volatile storage area, such as a computer hard drive.
Processing role-maps the upstream security role to the downstream security role in one of two ways. The first approach is to keep security-role-reference name assignments and require a user security context (i.e. requests) to include upstream security role identifiers (see
A determination is made as to whether the upstream application includes more role-mapping requirements (decision 570). The upstream application may include multiple role-mapping requirements corresponding to a single downstream application or the upstream application may include multiple role-mapping requirements corresponding to multiple downstream applications. If the upstream application includes more role-mapping requirements, decision 570 branches to “Yes” branch 572 which loops back to select (step 580) and process the next role-mapping requirement. This looping continues until the upstream application has no more role-mapping requirements to process, at which point decision 570 branches to “No” branch 578 whereupon processing ends at 590.
A determination is made as to whether processing is configured to role-map the upstream security role to the downstream security role by either including an upstream security role identifier in the downstream authorization table or by including upstream security role user-to-role mappings in the downstream authorization table (decision 630) (see
On the other hand, if processing is configured to include upstream security role assignments (i.e. user identifiers, group identifiers, etc.) in the downstream authorization table, decision 630 branches to “No” branch 632 whereupon processing identifies role assignments corresponding to the upstream security role (step 635). Processing adds the identified upstream role assignments to the downstream security role at step 640, and processing returns at 680.
A determination is made as to whether upstream security roles (e.g. roles 725) are included in request 715 (decision 740). If upstream security roles are not included in request 715, decision 740 branches to “No” branch 742 bypassing upstream role extraction steps. On the other hand, if request 715 includes upstream security roles, decision 740 branches to “Yes” branch 748 whereupon the downstream application extracts the upstream security roles from request 715 (step 750) and uses the upstream security roles in conjunction with user identifier 720 to determine authorization access (see below for further details).
Processing analyzes request 715 and identifies required downstream security roles for access authorization located in data store 765 (step 760). Data store 765 may be stored on a non-volatile storage area, such as a computer hard drive. Processing looks-up role assignments corresponding to the required downstream security roles and compares them with user identifier, 720 and roles 725 (step 770). A determination is made as to whether processing matched user identifier 720 or roles 725 (if applicable) with one of the required downstream security role assignments (decision 780). If processing did not identify a match, decision 780 branches to “No” branch 782 whereupon an error is returned at 785. On the other hand, if processing identified a match, decision 780 branches to “Yes” branch 788 whereupon processing authorizes the user at step 790, and processing ends at 795.
In one embodiment, processing may require information from a second downstream application in order to process the upstream application's request. In this embodiment, processing includes the matched downstream security role in a second request and send the second request to a second downstream application.
BIOS 880 is coupled to ISA bus 840, and incorporates the necessary processor executable code for a variety of low-level system functions and system boot functions. BIOS 880 can be stored in any computer readable medium, including magnetic storage media, optical storage media, flash memory, random access memory, read only memory, and communications media conveying signals encoding the instructions (e.g., signals from a network). In order to attach computer system 801 to another computer system to copy files over a network, LAN card 830 is coupled to PCI bus 825 and to PCI-to-ISA bridge 835. Similarly, to connect computer system 801 to an ISP to connect to the Internet using a telephone line connection, modem 875 is connected to serial port 864 and PCI-to-ISA Bridge 835.
While the computer system described in
One of the preferred implementations of the invention is an application, namely, a set of instructions (program code) in a code module which may, for example, be resident in the random access memory of the computer. Until required by the computer, the set of instructions may be stored in another computer memory, for example, on a hard disk drive, or in removable storage such as an optical disk (for eventual use in a CD ROM) or floppy disk (for eventual use in a floppy disk drive), or downloaded via the Internet or other computer network. Thus, the present invention may be implemented as a computer program product for use in a computer. In addition, although the various methods described are conveniently implemented in a general purpose computer selectively activated or reconfigured by software, one of ordinary skill in the art would also recognize that such methods may be carried out in hardware, in firmware, or in more specialized apparatus constructed to perform the required method steps.
While particular embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described, it will be obvious to those skilled in the art that, based upon the teachings herein, changes and modifications may be made without departing from this invention and its broader aspects and, therefore, the appended claims are to encompass within their scope all such changes and modifications as are within the true spirit and scope of this invention. Furthermore, it is to be understood that the invention is solely defined by the appended claims. It will be understood by those with skill in the art that if a specific number of an introduced claim element is intended, such intent will be explicitly recited in the claim, and in the absence of such recitation no such limitation is present. For a non-limiting example, as an aid to understanding, the following appended claims contain usage of the introductory phrases “at least one” and “one or more” to introduce claim elements. However, the use of such phrases should not be construed to imply that the introduction of a claim element by the indefinite articles “a” or “an” limits any particular claim containing such introduced claim element to inventions containing only one such element, even when the same claim includes the introductory phrases “one or more” or “at least one” and indefinite articles such as “a” or “an”; the same holds true for the use in the claims of definite articles.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US5708812 *||Jan 18, 1996||Jan 13, 1998||Microsoft Corporation||Method and apparatus for Migrating from a source domain network controller to a target domain network controller|
|US5768519 *||Jan 18, 1996||Jun 16, 1998||Microsoft Corporation||Method and apparatus for merging user accounts from a source security domain into a target security domain|
|US5930801||Oct 30, 1997||Jul 27, 1999||Xerox Corporation||Shared-data environment in which each file has independent security properties|
|US6023765||Nov 20, 1997||Feb 8, 2000||The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of Commerce||Implementation of role-based access control in multi-level secure systems|
|US6044466||Nov 25, 1997||Mar 28, 2000||International Business Machines Corp.||Flexible and dynamic derivation of permissions|
|US6067623||Nov 21, 1997||May 23, 2000||International Business Machines Corp.||System and method for secure web server gateway access using credential transform|
|US6073242 *||Mar 19, 1998||Jun 6, 2000||Agorics, Inc.||Electronic authority server|
|US6202066||Nov 18, 1998||Mar 13, 2001||The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of Commerce||Implementation of role/group permission association using object access type|
|US6263442 *||May 30, 1996||Jul 17, 2001||Sun Microsystems, Inc.||System and method for securing a program's execution in a network environment|
|US6289462||Sep 28, 1999||Sep 11, 2001||Argus Systems Group, Inc.||Trusted compartmentalized computer operating system|
|US6308273 *||Jun 12, 1998||Oct 23, 2001||Microsoft Corporation||Method and system of security location discrimination|
|US6339423 *||Mar 23, 2000||Jan 15, 2002||Entrust, Inc.||Multi-domain access control|
|US6385724||Nov 30, 1998||May 7, 2002||Microsoft Corporation||Automatic object caller chain with declarative impersonation and transitive trust|
|US6412070||Sep 21, 1998||Jun 25, 2002||Microsoft Corporation||Extensible security system and method for controlling access to objects in a computing environment|
|US6453353||Feb 12, 1999||Sep 17, 2002||Entrust, Inc.||Role-based navigation of information resources|
|US6466932||Mar 16, 1999||Oct 15, 2002||Microsoft Corporation||System and method for implementing group policy|
|US6526513||Aug 3, 1999||Feb 25, 2003||International Business Machines Corporation||Architecture for dynamic permissions in java|
|US6708276||Aug 3, 1999||Mar 16, 2004||International Business Machines Corporation||Architecture for denied permissions in Java|
|US6950825||May 30, 2002||Sep 27, 2005||International Business Machines Corporation||Fine grained role-based access to system resources|
|US7010600 *||Jun 29, 2001||Mar 7, 2006||Cisco Technology, Inc.||Method and apparatus for managing network resources for externally authenticated users|
|US20010014943 *||Dec 7, 2000||Aug 16, 2001||Hewlett-Packard Company||Method and apparatus for discovering a trust chain imparting a required attribute to a subject|
|US20020010679||Jul 5, 2001||Jan 24, 2002||Felsher David Paul||Information record infrastructure, system and method|
|US20020019936||Aug 10, 2001||Feb 14, 2002||David Hitz||File access control in a multi-protocol file server|
|US20020026592||Jun 14, 2001||Feb 28, 2002||Vdg, Inc.||Method for automatic permission management in role-based access control systems|
|US20020112155 *||Feb 26, 2001||Aug 15, 2002||Martherus Robin E.||User Authentication|
|US20020152212||Oct 16, 2001||Oct 17, 2002||Feldman Daniel J.||Entitlement management and access control system|
|US20030023880 *||Jul 25, 2002||Jan 30, 2003||Edwards Nigel John||Multi-domain authorization and authentication|
|US20030084324||Nov 1, 2001||May 1, 2003||International Business Machines Corporation||Method and apparatus for type independent permission based access control|
|US20030084325||Nov 1, 2001||May 1, 2003||International Business Machines Corporation||Method and apparatus for implementing permission based access control through permission type inheritance|
|US20040128559 *||Dec 31, 2002||Jul 1, 2004||Zurko Mary Ellen||Trusting security attribute authorities that are both cooperative and competitive|
|US20040186836 *||Mar 17, 2003||Sep 23, 2004||David Schlesinger||Entitlement security and control for information system entitlement|
|1||"Mapping Roles to Groups and Users," www.orionserver.com, downloaded Nov. 20, 2002 (2 pages).|
|2||A.C. Kapadia, "A Dynamic Role Translation Model for Secure Interoperability," Internet: URL: http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/kapadia01irbac.html, 2001 (41 pages).|
|3||Epstein et al., "Engineering of Role/Permission Assignments," Computer Security Applications Conference 17<SUP>th</SUP>, Dec. 10-14, 2001, p. 127-36.|
|4||Lowy, J., "Unify the Role-based Security Models for Enterprise and Application Domains with .Net", msdn magazine, May 2002, p. 58-64 (missing page contains advertisements).|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US7636851 *||Jun 30, 2005||Dec 22, 2009||Microsoft Corporation||Providing user on computer operating system with full privileges token and limited privileges token|
|US7874008 *||Aug 29, 2006||Jan 18, 2011||International Business Machines Corporation||Dynamically configuring extensible role based manageable resources|
|US8769653 *||Apr 29, 2009||Jul 1, 2014||International Business Machines Corporation||Unified access control system and method for composed services in a distributed environment|
|US20070005961 *||Jun 30, 2005||Jan 4, 2007||Microsoft Corporation||Providing user on computer operating system with full privileges token and limited privileges token|
|US20070079357 *||Oct 4, 2005||Apr 5, 2007||Disney Enterprises, Inc.||System and/or method for role-based authorization|
|US20080072316 *||Aug 29, 2006||Mar 20, 2008||David Yu Chang||Dynamically configuring extensible role based manageable resources|
|US20090276840 *||Apr 29, 2009||Nov 5, 2009||Bao Hua Cao||Unified access control system and method for composed services in a distributed environment|
|U.S. Classification||726/14, 709/238|
|International Classification||G06F15/173, H04L29/06, H04L9/00, G06F21/00|
|Cooperative Classification||H04L63/102, G06F21/6236|
|European Classification||G06F21/62B3, H04L63/10B|
|Mar 27, 2003||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION, NEW Y
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:CHANG, DAVID Y.;CHAO, CHING-YUN;REEL/FRAME:013931/0507
Effective date: 20030318
|Jul 2, 2012||REMI||Maintenance fee reminder mailed|
|Sep 28, 2012||SULP||Surcharge for late payment|
|Sep 28, 2012||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|Jul 1, 2016||REMI||Maintenance fee reminder mailed|
|Nov 18, 2016||LAPS||Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees|
|Jan 10, 2017||FP||Expired due to failure to pay maintenance fee|
Effective date: 20161118