|Publication number||US7483683 B1|
|Application number||US 11/890,265|
|Publication date||Jan 27, 2009|
|Filing date||Aug 3, 2007|
|Priority date||Jun 9, 2003|
|Also published as||US7299025|
|Publication number||11890265, 890265, US 7483683 B1, US 7483683B1, US-B1-7483683, US7483683 B1, US7483683B1|
|Inventors||Hee Wong, Michael Schwartz, James Braatz, Shu-ing Ju|
|Original Assignee||National Semiconductor Corporation|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (9), Referenced by (1), Classifications (9), Legal Events (1)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
This application is a continuation of prior U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/457,825 filed on Jun. 9, 2003 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,299,025.
The present invention is directed, in general, to mixing circuits for radios and, more specifically, to harmonic rejection for switching mixers.
An architecture for high-performance direct conversion radios is disclosed in co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/440,026 entitled “CHOPPER-DIRECT-CONVERSION (CDC) RADIO ARCHITECTURE” and filed May 16, 2003, the content of which is incorporated herein by reference. The architecture disclosed employs a phase-alternating mixer (PAM) that outputs a double-sideband (DSB) signal for use throughout the receiver circuitry. Such double-sideband signal paths eliminate the use of baseband frequencies that are generally problematic in large-scale circuit integration. In addition, problems associated with direct-conversion, such as local oscillator (LO) leakages, direct current (DC) offsets, low frequency noise and the like are all eliminated by relocating the local oscillator frequency away from the radio frequency (RF) employed for transmission.
When harmonic or alias signals are presented to the input of the radio, these unwanted signals interfere with the desired signal and degrade the quality of reception. To improve receiver quality, a surface acoustic wave (SAW) band select filter might be employed before the phase-alternating mixer to reject the unwanted signals. However, a better approach would be to design both the harmonic and alias rejection functions into the basic mixer circuitry.
There is, therefore, a need in the art for a harmonic rejection circuit that may be integrated into any type of mixer circuit, such as a phase-alternating mixer of the type described above.
To address the above-discussed deficiencies of the prior art, it is a primary object of the present invention to provide, for use in a mixing circuit, rejection of local oscillator harmonic response with a pair of harmonic gating switches serially connected to the outputs of a balanced differential switching mixer and controlled by a gate clock signal having twice the frequency of a local oscillator signal controlling the switching mixer. An aperture or duty cycle of the gate clock signal determines which harmonic is rejected or suppressed, which is preferably a third and/or fifth harmonic since response of the balanced differential switching mixer to even harmonics is negligible. The resulting simple, efficient circuit is readily integrated directly into a phase-alternating mixer structure for a chopper-direct-conversion radio.
The foregoing has outlined rather broadly the features and technical advantages of the present invention so that those skilled in the art may better understand the detailed description of the invention that follows. Additional features and advantages of the invention will be described hereinafter that form the subject of the claims of the invention. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that they may readily use the conception and the specific embodiment disclosed as a basis for modifying or designing other structures for carrying out the same purposes of the present invention. Those skilled in the art will also realize that such equivalent constructions do not depart from the spirit and scope of the invention in its broadest form.
Before undertaking the DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION below, it may be advantageous to set forth definitions of certain words or phrases used throughout this patent document: the terms “include” and “comprise,” as well as derivatives thereof, mean inclusion without limitation; the term “or” is inclusive, meaning and/or; the phrases “associated with” and “associated therewith,” as well as derivatives thereof, may mean to include, be included within, interconnect with, contain, be contained within, connect to or with, couple to or with, be communicable with, cooperate with, interleave, juxtapose, be proximate to, be bound to or with, have, have a property of, or the like; and the term “controller” means any device, system or part thereof that controls at least one operation, whether such a device is implemented in hardware, firmware, software or some combination of at least two of the same. It should be noted that the functionality associated with any particular controller may be centralized or distributed, whether locally or remotely. Definitions for certain words and phrases are provided throughout this patent document, and those of ordinary skill in the art will understand that such definitions apply in many, if not most, instances to prior as well as future uses of such defined words and phrases.
For a more complete understanding of the present invention, and the advantages thereof, reference is now made to the following descriptions taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein like numbers designate like objects, and in which:
Those skilled in the art will recognize that the complete structure and operation of a wireless communications system or a receiver therein are not depicted or described herein. Instead, for simplicity and clarity, only so much of a wireless communications system and associated receiver as is unique to the present invention or necessary for an understanding of the present invention is depicted and described.
Receiver 102 preferably employs the chopper-direct-conversion architecture described above. Receiver 102 includes a circuit 104, preferably implemented in a single integrated circuit, receiving a wireless radio frequency (RF) signal on an input 105 from an antenna (not shown). The received signal is passed through filter(s) and low noise amplifier 106, then split into a differential signal and passed as dual inputs to a switching mixer 107 controlled by a local oscillator (LO) signal. A series-connected harmonic gating circuit 108 receives the outputs of switching mixer 107 and is controlled by a gate clock signal running at twice the frequency of the local oscillator. The output of the harmonic gating circuit 108 is passed through a channel filter and automatic gain control (AGC) amplifier(s) 109 to produce the baseband output signal at output 110.
Mixers of the type employed in radio receivers may generally be categorized in two classes: multiplying mixers and switching mixers. Multiplying mixers simply perform a multiplying function where the output is the product of two input signals. Such mixers typically produce relatively low harmonic response, and therefore usually require no harmonic rejection circuit. Switching mixers, on the other hand, respond to odd harmonic frequencies because the local oscillator input is driven with a “harmonic-rich” square wave. However multiplying mixers are costly, so switching mixers are gaining popularity in modern radios due to the superior linearity, simplicity and many integration advantages provided. For these and other reasons, the gated-switching mixer of the present invention employs the switching mixer approach.
Harmonic response within a switching mixer is generally determined by three parameters: (1) band select filter response characteristics when a radio frequency surface acoustic wave filter is employed before the mixer as described above; (2) board parasitic and low noise amplifier/mixer high frequency roll-offs; and (3) mixer intrinsic harmonic response. Among those parameters, the radio frequency surface acoustic wave response characteristics are generally the most significant contributor to harmonic response.
By way of example,
The addition of harmonic gating circuit 108 to a conventional direct-conversion radio architecture as shown in
Co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/163,489 entitled “HARMONIC REJECTION MIXER” and filed Jun. 6, 2002, the content of which is incorporated herein by reference, discloses a harmonic rejection circuit utilizing a parallel mixing configuration. Due to the multiple parallel mixers, the harmonic rejection mixer disclosed in that application is capable of providing multiple nulls as several harmonic frequencies (e.g., the 3rd and 5th harmonics). The serial gating configuration of the gated-switching mixer of the present invention, which targets a low-cost solution, does not allow similar provision for multiple frequency nulls, and thus can reject only one harmonic frequency (e.g., either the 3rd or the 5th harmonic). However, rejection one harmonic is satisfactory for the chopper-direct-conversion phase-alternating mixer architecture.
The third trace (3) in each plot illustrates the antenna input, which for
Trace 4 illustrates the switching mixer output taken before the harmonic gating function, and is equivalent to conventional direct-conversion unfiltered baseband output. Trace 5 (the thinner of the two super-imposed traces) illustrates, for the purposes of comparison, a filtered version of trace 4 equivalent to the conventional direct-conversion baseband output—that is, at the output 110 of the circuit depicted in
Trace 6 illustrates a gated version of trace 4, taken at the output of the harmonic gating circuit and incorporating the effect of harmonic filtering. Trace 7 (the thicker of the two superimposed traces) illustrates a filtered version of trace 6, the final baseband output of a gated-switching mixer as depicted in
The harmonic responses of a variable duty cycle square (rectangular) wave gate clock signal for the harmonic gating circuit are plotted in
As shown in
When the gate clock signal has a 33.3% duty cycle (high for 120° and low for 240°), the magnitude of the 3rd harmonic becomes zero. Similarly, the magnitudes of the 6th, 9th, and all 3Śnth (where n is any positive, non-zero integer) harmonics are also zero. Accordingly, the gated-switching mixer of the present invention adapts this property and applies a 33.3% duty cycle to the gate clock for the harmonic gating circuit to reject the 3rd harmonic (as well as the 6th harmonic, the 9th harmonic, etc.). It should be noted that aperture widths corresponding to duty cycles of 33.3% and 66.6% are identical from a spectral perspective.
Since the gated-switching mixer depicted in
In still another modification, a third “dummy” current path may be added to the existing two paths through the fully balanced differential switching mixer, similar to a Gilbert cell. When the harmonic gate is active (the mixer output is gated off), the differential currents through the differential signal pair in the switching mixer are totally branched off onto the additional current path, which gates off the mixer outputs without disrupting the circuit node impedances or other circuit parameters. Such an implementation would work well for high performance designs.
The gated-switching mixer of the present invention is simple and effective, enhancing the harmonic response of virtually any type of mixer. Importantly, when the harmonic rejection feature of the gated-switching mixer is incorporated into a chopper-direct-conversion architecture, the resulting performance level surpasses currently available radio architectures.
Although the present invention has been described in detail, those skilled in the art will understand that various changes, substitutions, variations, enhancements, nuances, gradations, lesser forms, alterations, revisions, improvements and knock-offs of the invention disclosed herein may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention in its broadest form.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3569841||Jul 9, 1968||Mar 9, 1971||Richman Peter L||Harmonic-rejecting ac-to-dc converter|
|US4468784||Sep 15, 1982||Aug 28, 1984||Rockwell International Corporation||Three-state digital mixer-driver circuit|
|US4894621||Jun 13, 1988||Jan 16, 1990||Westinghouse Electric Corp.||Circuit for five level waveform synthesis|
|US5350413||Jul 22, 1991||Sep 27, 1994||The University Of Ottawa||Transcutaneous energy transfer device|
|US5867778||Dec 24, 1997||Feb 2, 1999||Northern Telecom Limited||Switched gain element|
|US6108529||Feb 1, 1998||Aug 22, 2000||Bae Systems Aerospace Electronics Inc.||Radio system including FET mixer device and square-wave drive switching circuit and method therefor|
|US6144236||Feb 1, 1998||Nov 7, 2000||Bae Systems Aerospace Electronics Inc.||Structure and method for super FET mixer having logic-gate generated FET square-wave switching signal|
|US6639447||Mar 8, 2002||Oct 28, 2003||Sirific Wireless Corporation||High linearity Gilbert I Q dual mixer|
|US20040142674||Jan 16, 2003||Jul 22, 2004||Nokia Corporation||Direct conversion receiver having a low pass pole implemented with an active low pass filter|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US7986192||Dec 16, 2009||Jul 26, 2011||Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.||Harmonic rejection mixer and harmonic rejection mixing method|
|U.S. Classification||455/275, 455/284, 455/130, 455/227|
|International Classification||H04B7/00, H04B1/06|
|Cooperative Classification||H03D2200/0086, H03D7/14|