|Publication number||US7495998 B1|
|Application number||US 11/415,347|
|Publication date||Feb 24, 2009|
|Filing date||May 1, 2006|
|Priority date||Apr 29, 2005|
|Publication number||11415347, 415347, US 7495998 B1, US 7495998B1, US-B1-7495998, US7495998 B1, US7495998B1|
|Inventors||Socrates Deligeorges, Allyn Hubbard, David Mountain|
|Original Assignee||Trustees Of Boston University|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (9), Non-Patent Citations (5), Referenced by (29), Classifications (6), Legal Events (4)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
This application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) of U.S. provisional patent application 60/676,189 filed Apr. 29, 2005, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
The invention disclosed in this application was made with Government support under Contract Number N00014-00-C-0314 awarded by the Department of the Navy, and Contract Number DAAD19-00-2-0004 awarded by the U.S. Army Research Office. The Government has certain rights in the invention.
The invention pertains to the field of acoustic signal processing with regard to sound source classification and localization.
In accordance with the present invention, apparatus and methods are disclosed for acoustic signal processing for sound source classification and localization using “biomimetic” techniques, i.e., techniques that are modeled after structures and functions found in biological systems such as mammalian aural physiology. The system uses several acoustic cues including Interaural Time Delay (ITD), Interaural Intensity Difference (IID), spectral cues, as well as periodicity cues to localize and identify sound sources. Three primary stages of processing include an acoustic acquisition stage, a biomimetic processing stage, and a feature processing stage. The invention maybe utilized with multiple sensor configurations, in fixed positions, on mobile platforms, or worn as part of standard equipment e.g. helmet based arrays.
Illustrative embodiments may be inexpensive to operate and maintain in the field and require relatively little power in use as a passive listening device. The system may be modular and easily configurable by changing or swapping modules. System sensor configurations can easily be adapted for a multiplicity of applications with a varying number of sensors and sensor geometries. Sensor configurations can be on very small scales, as small as a one-inch platform, or can be used on larger scale platforms with small changes to software or hardware. The system can be used with a single-user stand alone system or as a part of a distributed network. Performance is improved for specific mission applications with the addition of acoustic environmental and sound source models to the feature processing stage. A key feature of the system is the ability to operate in reverberant and noisy environments through the use of biomimetic processing. Single sensor arrays can be used for multiple tasks with the addition of new feature processing stages simultaneous using the same acoustic acquisition and biomimetic processing stages. Multiple specific application areas are identified.
The system may utilize a mixture of analog and digital devices with readily available off-the-shelf components. The system may be used with readily available power supplies and easily integrated with a variety of existing technologies and platforms. The feature processing for each sensor array unit provides users with low bandwidth information to network with other sensor arrays or to drive devices or can be used as part of heads-up displays as well as providing data logging capabilities for later processing and analysis.
The system provides accurate locations for sound sources and very robust cues for classifying sound sources. The modularity and mission-configurable feature processing in conjunction with the reverberation and noise tolerance of the system make it a low cost, robust, and versatile option for many acoustic processing tasks.
The foregoing and other objects, features and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following description of particular embodiments of the invention, as illustrated in the accompanying drawings in which like reference characters refer to the same parts throughout the different views. The drawings are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead being placed upon illustrating the principles of the invention.
The biomimetic approach uses mammalian physiology as a model for processing and extracting acoustic features. The processing involved in mammalian auditory systems is based on two ears or pairs of sensors. In the disclosed technique, the processing method employs pairs of sensors to acquire acoustic information for localization. The arrangement and geometry of the sensors is an integral aspect of acoustic acquisition and determines what acoustic features are available for extraction. The particulars of the sensor geometry are utilized within the feature processing algorithms 16 to classify and group features as part of “scene analysis”, a task involving both identification and localization of sound sources.
With reference to
Given any two-sensor arrangement in a two dimensional plane, there are two values of 0 which produce the same ITD value, and thus for a given ITD value there is an ambiguity in position. This ambiguity is often referred to as ‘front-back’ ambiguity. One pair of sensors can therefore only provide a localization estimate in one planar dimension, for example azimuth, and that estimate will have a reflected ambiguity about the axis of the sensors. This situation is illustrated in
To correct these dimensionally limited estimates and ambiguities, different numbers of sensors and different sensor geometries can be used. Although a biological system (e.g. an animal) may be limited to a pair of sensors, there is a biological strategy for obtaining an unambiguous estimate of sound source position in three dimensional space. Typically when trying to localize a sound, animals will change their head position several times. The position changes can be thought of as additional sensor pairs used to reduce the ambiguity in sound source location. Thus in the disclosed technique, additional pairs of sensors can be included as additional instantaneous ‘looks’ at the sound source. The initial geometry using a single pair of sensors 18 can extended to multiple sensor pairs. Orientation and arrangement of the additional sensors pairs is important to maximize new acoustic information.
As shown in
When dealing with biomimetic feature processing, acquiring the source signal in a way that optimizes information in the features is very important for the function of the system. In the case of auditory processing, there are four basic features which include, but are not restricted to:
All of these cues are useful for acoustic source identification and or localization, although the exact mechanisms by which these cues are extracted and utilized in biological systems are still a topic of great debate and are by no means obvious or well explained. Sound source localization and identification are not mutually exclusive, and in a biomimetic context, can be synergistic cues. Sound location helps to segregate sound sources which improves identification, and identifying a sound source also helps to distinguish it from others, which in turn can improve localization.
Typically, binaural cues are used primarily for localization, and monaural cues primarily for identification. Binaural cues require two receiving sensors, while monaural require only a single receiver. An important distinction in the biomimetic approach to processing is that it uses pair-wise sensor information when dealing with localization tasks. Arrangements with multiple sensors are taken by pairs and are put in a context of biological behaviors and methods used in biological systems to solve acoustic problems.
Given these features and a pair-wise arrangement of sensors, with a minimum number of sensors generally being both the most cost effective and desirable design, the methodology for designing a sensor geometry for any given application takes into account three major constraints:
1) Properties of the acoustic sound source
2) The acoustic environment in which the sound source is to be identified/localized
3) The form factor of the application, available size shape constraints
When considering an acoustic sound source there a several properties which are considered when designing a sensor geometry:
When considering the acoustic environment for operation there are also several factors which will affect geometry design, these include:
One of the most stringent constraints on design is the size and form factor of the application. When possible, certain aspects of the application physical structure are arranged to enhance acoustic features these include:
Several example applications are described below with corresponding considerations for sensor placement.
It should be noted that in addition to the various sensors 18, the acoustic acquisition system 10 of
The first component of the preprocessor 20 is a filter bank 30 with characteristics designed to roughly match frequency properties of individual auditory nerves seen in mammalian physiology. The filter bank 30 consists of an array of bandpass filters each having a different center frequency (CF). The CFs of the bandpass filters are distributed logarithmically over the application specific frequency range. In illustrative embodiments, there may be between 16 and 64 bandpass filters. Each filter has a fixed bandwidth to center frequency ratio (referred to as Q 3 dB) preferably in the range of 3 to 10. The filter implementation can vary dependent upon space and power constraints. Typical implementations use resonant second order filters in conjunction with a high pass filter set approximately a quarter of an octave below the CF. An alternative design uses a cascade of second order filters which difference adjacent filter outputs to create bandpass filters with auditory like properties.
Each bandpass filter in the filter bank 30 generates an output stream that is referred to as a ‘frequency channel’ representing an instantaneous estimate of spectral content in an acoustic signal over the corresponding bandwidth. The filter implementations are not particularly crucial to the design; the important components of the design are the distribution of CFs and the approximate Q of the filters in order to produce frequency channels with proper characteristics to represent the spectral content of the acoustic signal. For localization, a relatively low Q in the range of 3 to 6 is good. The overall bandwidth of the set of filters depends on the application. For sounds such as mortar fire that are concentrated in lower frequency bands, the filters may span the range of 100 Hz to 1 kHz, whereas for higher-frequency sounds such as gunshots, a band from 100 Hz to 8 kHz may be desirable. The parallel structure of frequency channels is the basis of all of the processing that occurs in the biomimetic processing sub-system 14, and the frequency channel dimension is maintained and represented in all the following stages of processing.
The frequency channel information from the bandpass filter bank 30 is passed into compression and rectification electronics 32 maintaining the parallel frequency channels from the filter bank. In an exemplary embodiment, the compression and rectification electronics 32 are identical for all of the frequency channels. The electronics consist of a log amplifier followed by soft rectifying circuit and low pass filter. The properties of the compression and rectification electronics are preferably designed to mimic hair cell transduction properties seen in the mammalian auditory system. The advantages of this processing stage are essentially two fold. First, the dynamic range over which the system can operate is increased, and second, the overall bandwidth of the signals being represented is decreased while maintaining a representation of the spectral content, even of high frequency signals.
Automatic gain control (AGC) circuitry 34 is an important part of the preprocessor 20. The AGC circuits 34 take the compressed and rectified signals and perform an additional stage of signal conditioning to emphasize specific aspects of the amplitude information in each frequency channel, in particular the onset and offset of sound sources. For low frequency information such as low frequency pure tones and slowly varying envelope information for high frequency signals, the gain control circuits 34 tend to emphasize the rising edge of the acoustic waveform producing markers for the phase of the information, something akin to ‘glints’ in sonar signals. These circuits perform several roles including increasing system dynamic range, maintaining optimal operating points for spike generating circuits in loud ambient noise environments, and also a certain level of reverberation tolerance through short term signal adaptation.
Referring back to
The refractory circuits 46 and 48 are used to regulate the threshold reference values as spikes are produced. Once a threshold circuit 40 has been activated, a narrow pulse of high voltage is generated and sent into a hardwired spike stream which can directly interface with digital hardware without an A/D interface. At the same time, the refractory circuits 46 and 48 are activated and drive up the reference values for the activated circuit. The absolute refractory circuit 46 temporarily sets threshold above maximum possible voltage levels in order to turn off spike generation. The relative refractory circuit 48 raises threshold levels to roughly 75% of the maximum voltage after the absolute refractory circuit 46 turns off, and then permits the threshold level to decay back to the initial reference value with a specific time constant on the order of 1-3 milliseconds. The refractory circuits 46 and 48 add a kind of hysteresis to the spike production process, reducing sensitivity to noise and ensuring good isolated production of spikes. The concept of generating spikes is taken from neurological systems and has a dual role in the system. First the spike generation is used as a method of marking ‘events’ in acoustic signals which can be anything from the onset of a sound to a particular phase of a low frequency signal. The second role is to convert high bandwidth information contained in the acoustic signals into low bandwidth signals that are easily interfaced with both digital processing and event based processing. The combination of the AGC cascade 36, 38 and the spike generation circuits 40 are critical for generating spikes which mark temporal features in the acoustics signals for biomimetic processing strategies.
Specifically, pairs of identical CF and threshold spike streams from two sensors 18 are run into a coincidence circuit 54 which in effect acts as a counter. An incoming spike for one sensor of the pair triggers the counter 54 to begin waiting for a spike from the other sensor of the pair. When a second spike occurs, a timeout circuit 56 checks to see if a sensor-geometry-specific time window has been exceeded. If the spike pair occurs within the timeout window, an ITD event is generated, and if not, no event is generated and the counter 54 is reset. This same circuit is used for every CF/spike threshold sensor pair.
There is one ITD feature from the ITD processor 22 for each combination of frequency channel, sensor pair, and threshold. Thus, in an embodiment having ten channels, three thresholds, and three sensor pairs, for example, there are 90 ITD features. The ITD features are combined to derive an indication of the direction of one or more sound sources, which may be a three-dimensional indication if an appropriate sensor geometry is employed. Within each channel, the signals from each threshold are combined in a weighted fashion to realize the desired wide dynamic range, as described above. The signals from different frequency bands are weighted to improve overall signal-to-noise ratio, with the weighting scheme being tailored to the application. The output(s) for each sensor pair provide an indication of the “cone of confusion” for that pair, and if more than two sensors are utilized, the outputs for the different sensor pairs can be combined to find “intersections” of the cones, removing the spatial ambiguities.
In many cases, downstream processing can choose the spike stream having the highest intensity for processing, improving signal-to-noise ratio. In other cases, one or more spike streams may have a higher signal-to-noise ratio than the highest-intensity stream, for example due to shadowing effects based on sensor placement and noise source location. In these cases, it makes sense to select such higher-signal-to-noise channels.
As noted above, there are a variety of potential applications for a biomimetic processing system of the general type illustrated in
Application 1: A Mobile Study Apparatus for Frog Populations Using Breeding Calls
A specialized acoustic apparatus may be used to examine frog populations, which are environmentally sensitive species and good indicators of environmental health, by using a sensor system to localize and count breeding adults by their calls. The calls are known to be restricted to a small frequency range, the individual animals will all be within the confines of the pond and at its surface, the individuals are territorial and do not move often, the calls will be transient, and the range of signal level will cover roughly 40 dB. The sensor platform must be small, lightweight, and portable to reach remote areas.
Given the sound sources are restricted to the planar surface of the pond which is a subset of the 2D planar space, only a single pair of sensors is sufficient to resolve location of the sound sources. To maximize the ITD and ILD cues created by the sensor housing, cubes were chosen. Cubes are simple to fabricate, it is easy to orient the sensors with respect to a target area, and although impossible to characterize with closed form mathematical solutions, empirically they produce larger and more distinct ITD patterns (generally known but never formalized in the literature, extremely difficult to prove mathematically). If higher resolution and or ranging information is required two small cube arrangements can be networked and individual pair estimates can be used to triangulate sound sources.
Application 2: A Mobile Reconnaissance Robot
Autonomous vehicles and mobile robotics have become useful tools in battlefield situations removing soldiers from dangerous situations and gathering useful intelligence. Many of the tasks these field robots are required to perform either require or are greatly facilitated by acoustic detection and localization of various sound sources such as sniper fire or incoming mortar rounds. One of the more successful pieces of equipment in recent military scenarios has been the Explorer Packbot produce by Irobot fitted with a dense array of zooming optical devices. In order to focus these optical devices such as thermal zoom cameras on proper targets when conditions are at their best for a given problem, for example the moments immediately after a sniper shot to capture the thermal bloom of the muzzle blast, an acoustic localizer is essential. There are several challenges for choosing sensor placement on an Irobot platform.
The physical structure of the vehicle limits the maximum spacing of the sensors, there is also significant noise from motors and interfering magnetic fields from drive motors that limit the location of sensors. Because the applications are also low to the ground, issues such as ground bounce often interfere with the most useful acoustic cues. Sensor placement was chosen as high up on the vehicle as possible, on top of the vehicle sensor head, the physical head itself is used as an acoustic shield from motor noise and ground bounce. Packbot Explorer sensor heads are square by design, so sensors are placed in the corners of the head mounted nearly flush to the surface with a slight tapering collar. The flat surface of the head has ambiguity with regard to position in the upper and lower hemispheres of 3D space, but for almost all situations the vehicle with a low tactical head height only has possible sound source positions in the upper hemisphere of space. The corner mounts optimize the available space and offer several options for detection schemes. Because these robot operate in high noise, high risk environments, sensor redundancy is important not only for increasing signal to noise performance, but also to maintain function in case of sensor damage. A square arrangement of sensors allows for a more task-configurable usage of sensors: diagonal corners can be used when larger spacing is desired, T-structures can be used if a single sensor is damaged with minimal changes to processing, or combinations of all microphone pairs can be used in high noise environment to improve signal when computational resources are available.
Application 3: A Helmet Based System for Sniper Detection
As part of the Force warrior concept, individual soldiers are being fitted with the latest high tech equipment to enhance performance in battlefield conditions. A problem most soldiers face in field conditions is a loss of directional information because of helmets obscuring acoustic cues which normally would be used to localize sound sources. Acoustic sensors mounted in the surface of the helmet can be used to gather these acoustic cues and produce sound source position estimates which can be provided to the soldier through the visual display systems integrated into the next generation of helmets.
Helmet based applications have a constraint of size, but also have the additional complication of geometry. Many studies of geometric models from people such as Kuhn (1979) and others have shown that the geometry of a body between two acoustic sensors can greatly increase the ITD values obtained at the two sensors, and there by increase the angular resolution to which a sound source position can be determined. To a first approximation a helmet can be modeled quite well as a sphere, ideally sensors should be spaced as far apart as possible on the sphere for best performance. However, the helmet is not a sphere in that the bottom half must be open to accommodate the wearer. The best spacing with that constraint is bounded by a tetrahedral arrangement with the flat bottom surface facing the ground. This arrangement optimizes the sensor spacing condition while providing a roughly symmetric arrangement for post processing. Because of the mobility of the soldier and the variety of position a soldier make assume in the field resolution of sound sources in 3D space is required, this condition is also met by the tetrahedral arrangement.
Application 4: A Wall-Mounted Acoustic Tracking System
For additional security and surveillance in commercial applications, it is useful to have acoustic tracking technology work in conjunction with video cameras and other equipment with limited directional capabilities. Acoustic systems can be used to track sound sources and guide other equipment to the sound source to minimize ‘holes’ in sensor networks. Acoustic technologies will also function in conditions where optical equipment would fail such as high or low light conditions. Acoustic sensors can also be much less intrusive than other kinds of sensors and draw far less power, they can be used as a first line of security alerting other sensor systems to activate.
Application 5: A HumVee Mounted Acoustic Monitoring System
The HumVee is a vehicle that is often placed in high risk areas where localizing sniper fire or the direction of incoming mortar rounds would be extremely advantageous. The vehicle itself is a large noise source that can interfere with localizing a sound source. Sensor placement needs to be as far from engine and exhaust noise as possible, the best position being the roof of the vehicle. The height and position on the roof uses the vehicle as a shield for ground bounce as well as vehicle generated noise. The vehicle also is capable of traveling at relatively high speeds and makes wind noise and vehicle vibration an issue. The large area provided by the vehicle roof allows for large sensor spacings and for sensor casings large enough to accommodate vibration damping materials and windscreens. A square arrangement of sensors provides localization accuracy in the upper hemisphere of space around the vehicle which is sufficient for most vehicle conditions. The square arrangement also allows for sensor damage where any single sensor can be removed and the remaining three will provide accurate estimates.
Application 6: An Underwater System for Monitoring Dolphin Pod Behavior
Monitoring dolphins in the wild is a difficult task, but is best accomplished using acoustic methods. Undersea environments do not lend themselves to video surveillance because of the rapid fall off in light intensity, but is ideal for acoustic monitoring because of the excellent conduction of sound. More over, dolphins are extremely vocal animals that not only communicate using acoustic signals, but also navigate with them as well.
The arrangement of acoustic sensors for such applications have several constraints, first the structure must be open in order to minimize drift from ocean currents, second the structure must be as large as possible to compensate for increased speed of sound in water. In addition the sensors must be arranged to have good resolution in all three dimensional space as underwater environments allow for movement freely in all directions. Directional cues are used to identify animal position, vocalization identification is used track individual animals. The configuration which optimizes many of the performance to constraint value is an open strutted tetrahedral array. The tetrahedral structure is structurally strong and lends itself to being built with a minimum number of struts opening up the array housing to allow for easy water flow through the array. The structure also has equidistant terminal points producing identical sensor separation for all sensors pairs minimizing the computational complexity of the acoustic processing.
Beyond the above, there are several other general and specific application areas for acoustic biomimetic processing including the following:
Population monitoring (including background monitoring as well as localizing/identifying specific members)
Acoustic data logging (data compression)
Underwater acoustic monitoring (both passive and “active” in the sense of providing a stimulus such as in sonar)
Additionally, the concepts disclosed herein can be applied to processing of other forms of energy such as vibrational or seismic energy, which can be utilized for tasks such as machine condition monitoring, nuclear test monitoring, and earthquake or other seismic monitoring. It may be possible to utilize the general processing scheme in conjunction with chemical sensors so as to identify and localize pollutants or other substances of interest against a background of substances.
While this invention has been particularly shown and described with references to preferred embodiments thereof, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and details may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US4536844 *||Apr 26, 1983||Aug 20, 1985||Fairchild Camera And Instrument Corporation||Method and apparatus for simulating aural response information|
|US5473759 *||Feb 22, 1993||Dec 5, 1995||Apple Computer, Inc.||Sound analysis and resynthesis using correlograms|
|US5544129||Aug 30, 1994||Aug 6, 1996||Aai Corporation||Method and apparatus for determining the general direction of the origin of a projectile|
|US5930202||Nov 19, 1997||Jul 27, 1999||Gte Internetworking Incorporated||Acoustic counter-sniper system|
|US6178141||May 28, 1999||Jan 23, 2001||Gte Internetworking Incorporated||Acoustic counter-sniper system|
|US6798715 *||Jul 9, 2001||Sep 28, 2004||Neptune Technologies, Inc.||Biomimetic sonar system and method|
|US20030139851 *||Jun 8, 2001||Jul 24, 2003||Kazuhiro Nakadai||Robot acoustic device and robot acoustic system|
|US20040165478 *||Jul 9, 2001||Aug 26, 2004||Harmon John B.||Biomimetic sonar system and method|
|WO2003099179A1 *||May 26, 2003||Dec 4, 2003||Bionic Ear Inst||Generation of electrical stimuli for application to a cochlea|
|1||"Pilar Sniper Countermeasures System," Canberra, 2007 [online]. Retrieved from www.canberra.com.|
|2||"SADS-Small Arms Fire Detection System," Rafael, undated [online]. Retrieved from www.rafael.co.il.|
|3||"Saic Sentinel Acoustin Counter-Sniper System," Proc. SPIE vol. 2938, 276 (1997) [Abstract]. Retrieved from http://spiedl.aip.org.|
|4||"The Sentri Solution," Safety Dynamics Product Information [online], 2007. Retrieved from www.safetydynamics.net.|
|5||Mountain et al., "Event-based Processing: Spikes are no Coincidence," Assoc. for Research in Otolaryngology, 2001 [Abstract]. Retrieved from www.aro.org/archives/2001/21796.|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US7710828||Mar 7, 2008||May 4, 2010||Bbn Technologies Corp||Systems and methods for determining shooter locations with weak muzzle detection|
|US8005631||Mar 7, 2008||Aug 23, 2011||Raytheon Bbn Technologies Corp.||System and method for identifying a muzzle blast using a multi-sensor total energy approach|
|US8149649||Sep 27, 2007||Apr 3, 2012||Raytheon Bbn Technologies Corp.||Self calibrating shooter estimation|
|US8270632 *||Jul 27, 2010||Sep 18, 2012||Korea Institute Of Science And Technology||Sound source localization system and method|
|US8320217||Dec 2, 2009||Nov 27, 2012||Raytheon Bbn Technologies Corp.||Systems and methods for disambiguating shooter locations with shockwave-only location|
|US8369184 *||Jan 26, 2010||Feb 5, 2013||Shotspotter, Inc.||Systems and methods with improved three-dimensional source location processing including constraint of location solutions to a two-dimensional plane|
|US8437223||Jul 28, 2008||May 7, 2013||Raytheon Bbn Technologies Corp.||System and methods for detecting shooter locations from an aircraft|
|US8812139 *||Dec 21, 2010||Aug 19, 2014||Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd.||Electronic device capable of auto-tracking sound source|
|US8937847 *||Mar 31, 2009||Jan 20, 2015||Sercel||System for acquiring seismic data in a marine environment, using seismic streamers coupled to means for detecting and/or locating marine mammals|
|US9025412||Mar 11, 2014||May 5, 2015||Sercel||System for acquiring seismic data in a marine environment, using seismic streamers coupled to means for detecting and/or locating marine mammals|
|US9062539 *||Apr 26, 2011||Jun 23, 2015||Saudi Arabian Oil Company||Hybrid transponder system for long-range sensing and 3D localization|
|US9146295 *||May 24, 2012||Sep 29, 2015||The Boeing Company||Acoustic ranging system using atmospheric dispersion|
|US9187993 *||Apr 26, 2011||Nov 17, 2015||Saudi Arabian Oil Company||Methods of employing and using a hybrid transponder system for long-range sensing and 3D localizaton|
|US20080048907 *||Aug 28, 2007||Feb 28, 2008||Denso Corporation||Object direction detection method and apparatus for determining target object direction based on rectified wave phase information obtained from plurality of pairs of receiver elements|
|US20080159078 *||Mar 7, 2008||Jul 3, 2008||Bbn Technologies Corp||Systems and methods for determining shooter locations with weak muzzle detection|
|US20090251991 *||Mar 31, 2009||Oct 8, 2009||Sercel||System for acquiring seismic data in a marine environment, using seismic streamers coupled to means for detecting and/or locating marine mammals|
|US20100020643 *||Jan 28, 2010||Bbn Technologies Corp.||System and methods for detecting shooter locations from an aircraft|
|US20100195445 *||Aug 5, 2010||Calhoun Robert B||Systems And Methods With Improved Three-Dimensional Source Location Processing Including Constraint Of Location Solutions To A Two-Dimensional Plane|
|US20110222707 *||Sep 15, 2011||Do Hyung Hwang||Sound source localization system and method|
|US20120041580 *||Dec 21, 2010||Feb 16, 2012||Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd.||Electronic device capable of auto-tracking sound source|
|US20120109375 *||Jun 23, 2010||May 3, 2012||Lizard Technology||Sound localizing robot|
|US20120273191 *||Apr 26, 2011||Nov 1, 2012||Saudi Arabian Oil Company||Methods of employing and using a hybrid transponder system for long-Range sensing and 3D localization|
|US20120273192 *||Apr 26, 2011||Nov 1, 2012||Saudi Arabian Oil Company||Hybrid Transponder System For Long-Range Sensing and 3D Localization|
|US20130317669 *||May 24, 2012||Nov 28, 2013||The Boeing Company||Acoustic Ranging System Using Atmospheric Dispersion|
|CN102438189A *||Aug 30, 2011||May 2, 2012||东南大学||Dual-channel acoustic signal-based sound source localization method|
|CN102438189B||Aug 30, 2011||Jul 9, 2014||东南大学||Dual-channel acoustic signal-based sound source localization method|
|CN103002250B *||Sep 21, 2011||Jun 17, 2015||睿致科技股份有限公司||声源监视系统及其方法|
|WO2010149167A1 *||Jun 23, 2010||Dec 29, 2010||Lizard Technology Aps||Sound localizing robot|
|WO2012108918A1 *||Nov 10, 2011||Aug 16, 2012||The Trustees Of Dartmouth College||Acoustic sensor with an acoustic object detector for reducing power consumption in front-end circuit|
|Cooperative Classification||G01S3/8006, G01S3/86|
|European Classification||G01S3/86, G01S3/80W|
|Jul 28, 2006||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY, MASSACHUSETTS
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:DELIGEORGES, SOCRATES;HUBBARD, ALLYN;MOUNTAIN, DAVID;REEL/FRAME:018018/0962
Effective date: 20060724
|Aug 1, 2006||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: NAVY, SECRETARY OF THE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Free format text: CONFIRMATORY LICENSE;ASSIGNOR:BOSTON UNIVERSITY;REEL/FRAME:018138/0939
Effective date: 20060625
|Aug 29, 2012||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|Aug 29, 2012||SULP||Surcharge for late payment|