|Publication number||US7531514 B2|
|Application number||US 11/431,412|
|Publication date||May 12, 2009|
|Filing date||May 9, 2006|
|Priority date||Aug 24, 2000|
|Also published as||CA2501943A1, EP1562624A2, EP1562624A4, US7199102, US7807640, US7820784, US7994132, US8404635, US20040266671, US20070254839, US20080045459, US20080096814, US20080096815, US20080096816, US20120035095, WO2004034977A2, WO2004034977A3|
|Publication number||11431412, 431412, US 7531514 B2, US 7531514B2, US-B2-7531514, US7531514 B2, US7531514B2|
|Inventors||Alan M. Fogelman, Gattadahalli M. Anantharamaiah, Mohamad Navab|
|Original Assignee||The Regents Of The University Of California, The Uab Research Foundation|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (99), Non-Patent Citations (99), Referenced by (23), Classifications (42), Legal Events (4)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
This application is a continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 10/423,830, filed on Apr. 25, 2003, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. Ser. No. 10/273,386, filed on Oct. 16, 2002, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. Ser. No. 10/187,215, filed on Jun. 28, 2002, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. Ser. No. 09/896,841, filed on Jun. 29, 2001, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. Ser. No. 09/645,454, filed on Aug. 24, 2000, all of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety for all purposes.
This invention was made with Government support under Grant No. HL30568 and HL34343 awarded by the National Institutes of Health. The Government has certain rights in this invention.
This invention relates to the field of atherosclerosis. In particular, this invention pertains to the identification of a class of peptides that are orally administrable and that ameliorate one or more symptoms of atherosclerosis.
Cardiovascular disease is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality, particularly in the United States and in Western European countries. Several causative factors are implicated in the development of cardiovascular disease including hereditary predisposition to the disease, gender, lifestyle factors such as smoking and diet, age, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia, including hypercholesterolemia. Several of these factors, particularly hyperlipidemia and hypercholesteremia (high blood cholesterol concentrations) provide a significant risk factor associated with atherosclerosis.
Cholesterol is present in the blood as free and esterified cholesterol within lipoprotein particles, commonly known as chylomicrons, very low density lipoproteins (VLDLs), low density lipoproteins (LDLs), and high density lipoproteins (HDLs). Concentration of total cholesterol in the blood is influenced by (1) absorption of cholesterol from the digestive tract, (2) synthesis of cholesterol from dietary constituents such as carbohydrates, proteins, fats and ethanol, and (3) removal of cholesterol from blood by tissues, especially the liver, and subsequent conversion of the cholesterol to bile acids, steroid hormones, and biliary cholesterol.
Maintenance of blood cholesterol concentrations is influenced by both genetic and environmental factors. Genetic factors include concentration of rate-limiting enzymes in cholesterol biosynthesis, concentration of receptors for low density lipoproteins in the liver, concentration of rate-limiting enzymes for conversion of cholesterols bile acids, rates of synthesis and secretion of lipoproteins and gender of person. Environmental factors influencing the hemostasis of blood cholesterol concentration in humans include dietary composition, incidence of smoking, physical activity, and use of a variety of pharmaceutical agents. Dietary variables include amount and type of fat (saturated and polyunsaturated fatty acids), amount of cholesterol, amount and type of fiber, and perhaps amounts of vitamins such as vitamin C and D and minerals such as calcium.
Epidemiological studies show an inverse correlation of high density lipoprotein (HDL) and apolipoprotein (apo) A-I levels with the occurrence of atherosclerotic events (Wilson et al. (1988) Arteriosclerosis 8: 737-741). Injection of HDL into rabbits fed an atherogenic diet has been shown to inhibit atherosclerotic lesion formation (Badimon et al. (1990) J. Clin. Invest. 85: 1234-1241).
Human ApoA-I has been a subject of intense study because of its anti-atherogenic properties. Exchangeable apolipoproteins, including ApoA-I, possess lipid-associating domains (Brouillette and Anantharamaiah (1995) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1256:103-129; Segrest et al. (1974) FEBS Lett. 38: :247-253). ApoA-I has been postulated to possess eight tandem repeating 22 mer sequences, most of which have the potential to form class A amphipathic helical structures (Segrest et al. (1974) FEBS Lett. 38: 247-253). Characteristics of the class A amphipathic helix include the presence of positively charged residues at the polar-nonpolar interface and negatively charged residues at the center of the polar face (Segrest et al. (1974) FEBS Lett. 38: 247-253; Segrest et al. (1990) Proteins: Structure, Function, and Genetics 8: 103-117). ApoA-I has been shown to strongly associate with phospholipids to form complexes and to promote cholesterol efflux from cholesterol-enriched cells. The delivery and maintenance of serum levels of ApoA-I to effectively mitigate one or more symptoms of atherosclerosis has heretofore proven elusive.
This invention provides novel peptides administration of which mitigates one or more symptoms of atherosclerosis. In particular, it was a discovery of this invention that peptides comprising a class A amphipathic helix when formulated with “D” amino acid residue(s) and/or having protected amino and carboxyl termini can be orally administered to an organism, are readily taken up and delivered to the serum, and are effective to mitigate one or more symptoms of atherosclerosis. In certain embodiments, the peptides can be formulated with all “L” amino acid residues and are still effective, particular when administered by routes other than oral administration.
The peptides of this invention are typically effective to stimulate the formation and cycling of pre-beta high density lipoprotein-like particles and/or to promote lipid transport and detoxification.
The peptides described herein are also effective for preventing the onset or inhibiting or eliminating one or more symptoms of osteoporosis.
It was also a surprising discovery that the peptides can be used to enhance (e.g. synergistically enhance) the activity of statins thereby permitting the effective use of statins at lower dosages and/or cause the statins to be significantly more anti-inflammatory at any given dose.
Thus, in one embodiment, this invention provides a peptide that amelioriates one or more symptoms of atherosclerosis where the peptide comprises a a peptide or a concatamer of a peptide that ranges in length from about 10 to about 30 amino acids, that comprises at least one class A amphipathic helix; that protects a phospholipid against oxidation by an oxidizing agent; and that is not the D-18A peptide and/or is not a peptide disclosed in WO 97/36927, and/or U.S. Pat. No. 6,037,323, and/or U.S. Pat. No. 4,643,988. In certain embodiments, the peptide is at least 10 amino acids in length. In certain embodiments, the peptide is about 40 or fewer amino acids in length. In certain embodiments, the peptide comprises all “L” amino acids while in certain other embodiments, the peptide comprises at least one “D” amino acid residue. In certain embodiments, all enantiomeric amino acids comprising the peptide are “D” amino acids. The peptide can, optionally, further comprises a protecting group (e.g. a protecting group coupled to the amino and/or to the carboxyl terminus). Suitable protecting groups include, but are not limited to, acetyl (Ac), amide, a 3 to 20 carbon alkyl group, Fmoc, t-butoxycarbonyl (Tboc), 9-fluoreneacetyl group, 1-fluorenecarboxylic group, 9-fluorenecarboxylic group, 9-fluorenone-1-carboxylic group, benzyloxycarbonyl, Xanthyl (Xan), Trityl (Trt), 4-methyltrityl (Mtt), 4-methoxytrityl (Mmt), 4-methoxy-2,3,6-trimethyl-benzenesulphonyl (Mtr), Mesitylene-2-sulphonyl (Mts), 4,4-dimethoxybenzhydryl (Mbh), Tosyl (Tos), 2,2,5,7,8-pentamethyl chroman-6-sulphonyl (Pmc), 4-methylbenzyl (MeBzl), 4-methoxybenzyl (MeOBzl), Benzyloxy (BzlO), Benzyl (Bzl), Benzoyl (Bz), 3-nitro-2-pyridinesulphenyl (Npys), 1-(4,4-dimethyl-2,6-dioxocyclohexylidene)ethyl (Dde), 2,6-dichlorobenzyl (2,6-DiCl-Bzl), 2-chlorobenzyloxycarbonyl (2-Cl-Z), 2-bromobenzyloxycarbonyl (2-Br-Z), benzyloxymethyl (Bom), cyclohexyloxy (cHxO), t-butoxymethyl (Bum), t-butoxy (tBuO), t-Butyl (tBu), and trifluoroacetyl (TFA). In certain embodiments, the the peptide further comprises a first protecting group coupled to the amino terminus and a second protecting group coupled to the carboxyl terminus. The peptide can be mixed with a with a pharmacologically acceptable excipient (e.g., a pharmacologically acceptable excipient suitable for oral administration to a mammal). In certain embodiments, the comprises a sequence selected from the group consisting of D-W-L-K-A-F-Y-D-K-V-A-E-K-L-K-E-A-F- (SEQ ID NO:2), D-W-F-K-A-F-Y-D-K-V-A-E-K-L-K-E-A-F-(SEQ ID NO:3), D-W-L-K-A-F- Y-D-K-V-A-E-K-F-K-E-A-F- (SEQ ID NO:4), D-W-F-K-A-F-Y-D-K-V-A-E-K-F-K-E-A-F- (SEQ ID NO:5), D-W-L-K-A-F-Y-D-K-V-F-E-K-F-K-E-F-F- (SEQ ID NO:6), D-W-L-K-A-F-Y-D-K- F-F-E-K-F-K-E-F-F- (SEQ ID NO:7), D-W-F-K-A-F-Y-D-K-F-F-E-K-F-K-E-F-F- (SEQ ID NO:8), D-W-L-K-A-F-Y-D-K-V-A-E-K-L-K-E-F-F- (SEQ ID NO:9), D-W-L-K-A-F-Y-D-K-V- F-E-K-F-K-E-A-F- (SEQ ID NO:10), D-W-L-K-A-F-Y-D-K-V-F-E-K-L-K-E-F-F- (SEQ ID NO:11), D-W-L-K-A-F-Y-D-K-V-A-E-K-F-K-E-F-F- (SEQ ID NO:12), D-W-L-K-A-F-Y-D-K- V-F-E-K-F-K-E-F-F- (SEQ ID NO:13), E-W-L-K-L-F-Y-E-K-V-L-E-K-F-K-E-A-F- (SEQ ID NO:14), E-W-L-K-A-F-Y-D-K-V-A-E-K-F-K-E-A-F- (SEQ ID NO:15), E-W-L-K-A-F-Y-D-K- V-A-E-K-L-K-E-F-F- (SEQ ID NO:16), E-W-L-K-A-F-Y-D-K-V-F-E-K-F-K-E-A-F- (SEQ ID NO:17), E-W-L-K-A-F-Y-D-K-V-F-E-K-L-K-E-F-F- (SEQ ID NO:18), E-W-L-K-A-F-Y-D-K- V-A-E-K-F-K-E-F-F- (SEQ ID NO:19), E-W-L-K-A-F-Y-D-K-V-F-E-K-F-K-E-F-F- (SEQ ID NO:20), A-F-Y-D-K-V-A-E-K-L-K-E-A-F- (SEQ ID NO:21), A-F-Y-D-K-V-A-E-K-F-K-E-A-F- (SEQ ID NO:22), A-F-Y-D-K-V-A-E-K-F-K-E-A-F- (SEQ ID NO:23), A-F-Y-D-K-F-F-E-K-F- K-E-F-F- (SEQ ID NO:24), A-F-Y-D-K-F-F-E-K-F-K-E-F-F- (SEQ ID NO:25), A-F-Y-D-K-V-A-E-K- F-K-E-A-F- (SEQ ID NO:26), A-F-Y-D-K-V-A-E-K-L-K-E-F-F- (SEQ ID NO:27), A-F- Y-D-K-V-F-E-K-F-K-E-A-F- (SEQ ID NO:28), A-F-Y-D-K-V-F-E-K-L-K-E-F-F- (SEQ ID NO:29), A-F-Y-D-K-V-A-E-K-F-K-E-F-F- (SEQ ID NO:30), K-A-F-Y-D-K-V-F-E-K-F-K-E-F- (SEQ ID NO:31), L-F-Y-E-K-V-L-E-K-F-K-E-A-F- (SEQ ID NO:32), A-F-Y-D-K-V-A-E-K-F- K-E-A-F- (SEQ ID NO:33), A-F-Y-D-K-V-A-E-K-L-K-E-F-F- (SEQ ID NO:34), A-F-Y-D-K-V- F-E-K-F-K-E-A-F- (SEQ ID NO:35), A-F-Y-D-K-V-F-E-K-L-K-E-F-F- (SEQ ID NO:36), A-F- Y-D-K-V-A-E-K-F-K-E-F-F- (SEQ ID NO:37), A-F-Y-D-K-V-F-E-K-F-K-E-F-F- (SEQ ID NO:38), D-W-L-K-A-L-Y-D-K-V-A-E-K-L-K-E-A-L- (SEQ ID NO:39), D-W-F-K-A-F-Y-E-K- V-A-E-K-L-K-E-F-F- (SEQ ID NO:40), D-W-F-K-A-F-Y-E-K-F-F-E-K-F-K-E-F-F- (SEQ ID NO:41), E-W-L-K-A-L-Y-E-K-V-A-E-K-L-K-E-A-L- (SEQ ID NO:42), E-W-L-K-A-F-Y-E-K- V-A-E-K-L-K-E-A-F- (SEQ ID NO:43), E-W-F-K-A-F-Y-E-K-V-A-E-K-L-K-E-F-F- (SEQ ID NO:44), E-W-L-K-A-F-Y-E-K-V-F-E-K-F-K-E-F-F- (SEQ ID NO:45), E-W-L-K-A-F-Y-E-K-F- F-E-K-F-K-E-F-F- (SEQ ID NO:46), E-W-F-K-A-F-Y-E-K-F-F-E-K-F-K-E-F-F- (SEQ ID NO:47), D-F-L-K-A-W-Y-D-K-V-A-E-K-L-K-E-A-W- (SEQ ID NO:48), E-F-L-K-A-W-Y-E-K- V-A-E-K-L-K-E-A-W- (SEQ ID NO:49), D-F-W-K-A-W-Y-D-K-V-A-E-K-L-K-E-W-W- (SEQ ID NO:50), E-F-W-K-A-W-Y-E-K-V-A-E-K-L-K-E-W-W- (SEQ ID NO:51), D-K-L-K-A-F-Y-D-K- V-F-E-W-A-K-E-A-F- (SEQ ID NO:52), D-K-W-K-A-V-Y-D-K-F-A-E-A-F-K-E-F-L- (SEQ ID NO:53), E-K-L-K-A-F-Y-E-K-V-F-E-W-A-K-E-A-F- (SEQ ID NO:54), E-K-W-K-A-V- Y-E-K-F-A-E-A-F-K-E-F-L- (SEQ ID NO:55), D-W-L-K-A-F-V-D-K-F-A-E-K-F-K-E-A-Y- (SEQ ID NO:56), E-K-W-K-A-V-Y-E-K-F-A-E-A-F-K-E-F-L- (SEQ ID NO:57), D-W-L-K-A-F- V-Y-D-K-V-F-K-L-K-E-F-F- (SEQ ID NO:58), E-W-L-K-A-F-V-Y-E-K-V-F-K-L-K-E-F-F- (SEQ ID NO:59), D-W-L-R-A-F-Y-D-K-V-A-E-K-L-K-E-A-F- (SEQ ID NO:60), E-W-L-R-A-F- Y-E-K-V-A-E-K-L-K-E-A-F- (SEQ ID NO:61), D-W-L-K-A-F-Y-D-R-V-A-E-K-L-K-E-A-F- (SEQ ID NO:62), E-W-L-K-A-F-Y-E-R-V-A-E-K-L-K-E-A-F- (SEQ ID NO:63), D-W-L-K-A-F- Y-D-K-V-A-E-R-L-K-E-A-F- (SEQ ID NO:64), E-W-L-K-A-F-Y-E-K-V-A-E-R-L-K-E-A-F- (SEQ ID NO:65), D-W-L-K-A-F-Y-D-K-V-A-E-K-L-R-E-A-F- (SEQ ID NO:66), E-W-L-K-A-F- Y-E-K-V-A-E-K-L-R-E-A-F- (SEQ ID NO:67), D-W-L-K-A-F-Y-D-R-V-A-E-R-L-K-E-A-F- (SEQ ID NO:68), E-W-L-K-A-F-Y-E-R-V-A-E-R-L-K-E-A-F- (SEQ ID NO:69), D-W-L-R-A-F- Y-D-K-V-A-E-K-L-R-E-A-F- (SEQ ID NO:70), E-W-L-R-A-F-Y-E-K-V-A-E-K-L-R-E-A-F- (SEQ ID NO:71), D-W-L-R-A-F-Y-D-R-V-A-E-K-L-K-E-A-F- (SEQ ID NO:72), E-W-L-R-A-F- Y-E-R-V-A-E-K-L-K-E-A-F- (SEQ ID NO:73), D-W-L-K-A-F-Y-D-K-V-A-E-R-L-R-E-A-F- (SEQ ID NO:74), E-W-L-K-A-F-Y-E-K-V-A-E-R-L-R-E-A-F- (SEQ ID NO:75), D-W-L-R-A-F- Y-D-K-V-A-E-R-L-K-E-A-F- (SEQ ID NO:76), E-W-L-R-A-F-Y-E-K-V-A-E-R-L-K-E-A-F- (SEQ ID NO:77), D-W-L-K-A-F-Y-D-K-V-A-E-K-L-K-E-A-F-P-D-W-L-K-A-F-Y-D-K-V-A-E-K-L-K-E-A-F (SEQ ID NO:78), D-W-L-K-A-F-Y-D-K-V-A-E-K-L-K-E-F-F-P-D-W-L-K-A-F- Y-D-K-V-A-E-K-L-K-E-F-F (SEQ ID NO:79), D-W-F-K-A-F-Y-D-K-V-A-E-K-L-K-E-A-F-P-D-W- F-K-A-F-Y-D-K-V-A-E-K-L-K-E-A-F (SEQ ID NO:80), D-K-L-K-A-F-Y-D-K-V-F-E-W-A-K-E-A-F- P-D-K-L-K-A-F-Y-D-K-V-F-E-W-L-K-E-A-F (SEQ ID NO:81), D-K-W-K-A-V-Y-D-K- F-A-E-A-F-K-E-F-L-P-D-K-W-K-A-V-Y-D-K-F-A-E-A-F-K-E-F-L (SEQ ID NO:82), D-W- F-K-A-F-Y-D-K-V-A-E-K-F-K-E-A-F-P-D-W-F-K-A-F-Y-D-K-V-A-E-K-F-K-E-A-F (SEQ ID NO:83), D-W-L-K-A-F-V-Y-D-K-V-F-K-L-K-E-F-F-P-D-W-L-K-A-F-V-Y-D-K-V-F-K-L-K-E-F- F (SEQ ID NO:84), D-W-L-K-A-F-Y-D-K-F-A-E-K-F-K-E-F-F-P-D-W-L-K-A-F-Y-D-K-F-A-E-K- F-K-E-F-F (SEQ ID NO:85), E-W-F-K-A-F-Y-E-K-V-A-E-K-F-K-E-A-F (SEQ ID NO:86), D-W-F-K-A-F-Y-D-K-V-A-E-K-F (SEQ ID NO:87), F-K-A-F-Y-D-K-V-A-E-K- F-K-E (SEQ ID NO:88), F-K-A-F-Y-E-K-V-A-E-K-F-K-E (SEQ ID NO:89), F-K-A-F-Y-D-K- V-A-E-K-F-K-E (SEQ ID NO:90), F-K-A-F-Y-E-K-V-A-E-K-F-K-E (SEQ ID NO:91), D-W-F-K-A-F-Y-D-K-V-A-E-K-F-K-E-A-F (SEQ ID NO:92), E-W-F-K-A-F-Y-E-K- V-A-E-K-F-K-E-A-F (SEQ ID NO:93), A-F-Y-D-K-V-A-E-K-F-K-E-A-F (SEQ ID NO:94), D-W-F-K-A-F-Y-D-K-V-A-E-K-F (SEQ ID NO:95), D-W-L-K-A-F-Y-D-K-V- F-E-K-F-K-E-F-F (SEQ ID NO:96), E-W-L-K-A-F-Y-E-K-V-F-E-K-F-K-E-F-F (SEQ ID NO:97), A-F-Y-D-K-V-F-E-K-F-K-E-F-F (SEQ ID NO:98), A-F-Y-E-K-V-F-E-K-F-K-E-F- F (SEQ ID NO:99), D-W-L-K-A-F-Y-D-K-V-F-E-K-F (SEQ ID NO:100), E-W-L-K-A-F- Y-E-K-V-F-E-K-F (SEQ ID NO:101), L-K-A-F-Y-D-K-V-F-E-K-F-K-E (SEQ ID NO:102), and L-K-A-F-Y-E-K-V-F-E-K-F-K-E (SEQ ID NO:103). In certain embodiments, the foregoing peptides comprise all “L” amino acids. In certain embodiments, the foregoing peptides comprise at least one “D” amino acid, more typically a plurality of “D” amino acids. In certain embodiments, at least half of the enantiomeric amino acids are “D” amino acids, and in certain embodiments, all of the enantiomeric amino acids are “D” amino acids.
In certain embodiments, the peptide further comprises a protecting group coupled to the amino and/or to the carboxyl terminus. Thus, for example, the peptide can comprise a protecting group coupled to the amino terminal where the amino terminal protecting group is a protecting group selected from the group consisting of a benzoyl group, an acetyl, a propionyl, a carbobenzoxy, a propyl, a butyl, a pentyl, a hexyl, an N-methyl anthranilyl, and a 3 to 20 carbon alkyl and/or the peptide comprises a protecting group coupled to the carboxyl terminal where the carboxyl terminal protecting group is an amide.
The oxidizing agent can be an agent such as hydrogen peroxide, 13(S)-HPODE, 15(S)-HPETE, HPODE, HPETE, HODE, HETE, and the like. In certain embodiments, the phospholipid is selected from the group consisting of 1-palmitoyl-2-arachidonoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphorylcholine (PAPC), 1-stearoyl-2-arachidonoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphorylcholine (SAPC)), 1-stearoyl-2-arachidonyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphorylethanolamine (SAPE).
The peptide can be provided as a pharmaceutical formulation, e.g. combined with a pharmaceutically acceptable excipient. The peptide can be provided as a unit dosage formulation, and, in certain embodiments, as a time release formulation (e.g. in a “time-release” matrix, microencapsulated, etc.).
In another embodiment, this invention provides a method of enhancing the activity of a statin in a mammal. The method typically involves coadministering with the statin an effective amount of one or more of the peptides described herein. In certain embodiments the statin include, but is not limited to one or more statins selected from the group consisting of cerivastatin, atorvastatin, simvastatin, pravastatin, fluvastatin, lovastatin. rosuvastatin, and pitavastatin. The peptide can be administered before, simultaneously with, or after administration of the statin(s). In certain embodiments, the peptide and/or the statin are administered as a unit dosage formulation. The administration of the peptide and/or the statin can be by a route including, but not limited to of oral administration, nasal administration, rectal administration, intraperitoneal injection, intravascular injection, subcutaneous injection, transcutaneous administration, intramuscular injection, and the like. In certain embodiments, the is a mammal diagnosed as having one or more symptoms of atherosclerosis. In certain embodiments, the mammal is a mammal diagnosed as at risk for stroke or atherosclerosis. The mammal can be a human or a non-human mammal.
In still another embodiment, this invention provides a method of mitigating one or more symptoms associated with atherosclerosis in a mammal. The method typically involves administering to the mammal an effective amount of one or more statins (e.g., cerivastatin, atorvastatin, simvastatin, pravastatin, fluvastatin, lovastatin. rosuvastatin, pitavastatin, etc.); and an effective amount of one or more peptides described herein, where the effective amount of the statin is lower than the effective amount of a statin administered without the peptide. In certain embodiments, the effective amount of the peptide is lower than the effective amount of the peptide administered without the statin. The peptide(s) can be administered before, simultaneously with, or after the statin(s). The peptide and/or the statin can be administered as a unit dosage formulation. The peptide(s) and/or statin(s) can be administered by a route including, but not limited to oral administration, nasal administration, rectal administration, intraperitoneal injection, intravascular injection, subcutaneous injection, transcutaneous administration, inhalation administration, and intramuscular injection. In certain embodiments, the mammal is a human or non-human mammal diagnosed as having one or more symptoms of atherosclerosis and/or at risk for stroke and/or atherosclerosis.
This invention also provides a pharmaceutical formulation. The formulation typically comprises a pharmaceutically acceptable excipient and one or more of the peptides described herein. Another pharmaceutical formulation typically comprises one or more statins (e.g., cerivastatin, atorvastatin, simvastatin, pravastatin, fluvastatin, lovastatin. rosuvastatin, pitavastatin, etc.) and one or more peptides as described herein. In certain embodiments, the peptide and/or said statin are present in an effective dose. In certain embodiments, the effective amount of the statin is lower than the effective amount of the statin administered without the peptide(s) and/or the effective amount of the peptide(s) is lower than the effective amount of the peptide(s) administered without the statin(s). In various embodiments, the statin(s) and/or the peptide(s) are in a time release formulation (e.g. a time release matrix, a microencapsulated formulation, and the like). The pharmaceutical formulation can be a unit dosage formulation, e.g., for oral administration. In certain embodiments, the formulation is formulated for administration by a route selected from the group consisting of oral administration, nasal administration, rectal administration, intraperitoneal injection, intravascular injection, subcutaneous injection, transcutaneous administration, inhalation administration, and intramuscular injection. The formulation can, optionally, further comprises one or more phospholipids (e.g. a phospholipid as described in U.S. Ser. No. 09/994,227).
In another embodiment, this invention provides a method of reducing or inhibiting one or more symptoms of osteoporosis in a mammal. The method typically involves administering to the mammal one or more peptides as described herein, where the peptide is administered in a concentration sufficient to reduce or eliminate one or more symptoms of osteoporosis. In certain embodiments, the peptide is administered in a concentration sufficient to reduce or eliminate decalcification of a bone. In certain embodiments, the peptide is administered in a concentration sufficient to induce recalcification of a bone. The peptide(s) can be mixed with a pharmacologically acceptable excipient, e.g. as described herein.
In certain embodiments, the methods and/or peptides of this invention exclude any one or more peptides disclosed in WO 97/36927, and/or U.S. Pat. No. 6,037,323, and/or U.S. Pat. No. 4,643,988 and/or in Garber et al. (1992) Arteriosclerosis and Thrombosis, 12: 886-894. In certain embodiments this invention excludes any one or more peptides disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,643,988 and/or in Garber et al (1992) that were synthesized with all enantiomeric amino acids being L amino acids or synthesized with D amino acids where the peptides are blocking groups. In certain embodiments, this invention excludes peptides having the formula A1-B1-B2- C1-D-B3-B4-A2-C2-B5-B6- A3-C3-B7-C4-A4-B8-B9 (SEQ ID NO:104) wherein A1, A2, A3 and A4 are independently aspartic acid or glutamic acid, or homologues or analogues thereof; B1, B2, B3, B4, B5, B6, B7, B8 and B9 are independently tryptophan, phenylalanine, alanine, leucine, tyrosine, isoleucine, valine or α- naphthylalanine, or homologues or analogues thereof; C1, C2, C3 and C4 are independently lysine or arginine, and D is serine, threonine, alanine, glycine, histidine, or homologues or analogues thereof; provided that, when A1 and A2 are aspartic acid, A3 and A4 are glutamic acid, B2 and B9 are leucine, B3 and B7 are phenylalanine, B4 is tyrosine, B5 is valine, B6, B8, and D are alanine, and C1, C2, C3 and C4 are lysine, B1 is not tryptophan.
In certain embodiments, this invention excludes any one or more peptides in WO 97/36927 and/or D variants thereof. Particular embodiments exclude one or more of the following: apoprotein A, apoprotein A-1, apoprotein A-2, apoprotein A4, apoprotein B, apoprotein B-48, apoprotein B-100, apoprotein C, apoprotein C-1, apoprotein C-2, apoprotein C-3, apoprotein D, apoprotein E as described in WO 97/36927.
In certain embodiments, also excluded are any one or more peptides disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,037,323 and/or D variants thereof. Particular embodiments exclude apo A-I agonist compounds comprising (i) an 18 to 22-residue peptide or peptide analogue that forms an amphipathic .alpha.-helix in the presence of lipids and that comprises the formula: Z1-X1-X2-X3-X4-X5-X6-X7-X8- X9-X10-X11-X12-X13-X14-X15-X16-X17-X18-Z2 (SEQ ID NO:105), where X1 is Pro (P), Ala (A), Gly (G), Asn (N), Gln (Q) or D-Pro (p); X2 is an aliphatic amino acid; X3 is Leu (L); X4 is an acidic amino acid; X5 is Leu (L) or Phe (F); X6 is Leu (L) or Phe (F); X7 is a basic amino acid; X8 is an acidic amino acid; X9 is Leu (L) or Trp (W); X10 is Leu (L) or Trp (W); X11 is an acidic amino acid or Asn (N); X12 is an acidic amino acid; X13 is Leu (L), Trp (W) or Phe (F); X14 is a basic amino acid or Leu (L); X15 is Gln (Q) or Asn (N); X16 is a basic amino acid; X17 is Leu (L); X18 is a basic amino acid; Z1 is H2 N— or RC(O)NH—; Z2 is —C(O)NRR, —C(O)OR or —C(O)OH or a salt thereof; each R is independently —H, (C1-C6)alkyl, (C1-C6)alkenyl, (C1-C6)alkynyl, (C5-C20)aryl, (C6-C26)alkaryl, 5-20 membered heteroaryl or 6-26 membered alkheteroaryl or a 1 to 4-residue peptide or peptide analogue in which one or more bonds between residues 1-7 are independently a substituted amide, an isostere of an amide or an amide mimetic; and each “-” between residues X1 through X18 independently designates an amide linkage, a substituted amide linkage, an isostere of an amide or an amide mimetic; or (ii) an altered form of formula (I) in which at least one of residues X1, X2, X3, X4, X5, X6, X7, X8, X9, X10, X11, X12, X13, X14, X15, X16, X17 or X18 is conservatively substituted with another residue, and/or D variants thereof.
The terms “polypeptide”, “peptide” and “protein” are used interchangeably herein to refer to a polymer of amino acid residues. The terms apply to amino acid polymers in which one or more amino acid residues is an artificial chemical analogue of a corresponding naturally occurring amino acid, as well as to naturally occurring amino acid polymers.
The term “class A amphipathic helix” refers to a protein structure that forms an α-helix producing a segregation of a polar and nonpolar faces with the positively charged residues residing at the polar-nonpolar interface and the negatively charged residues residing at the center of the polar face (see, e.g., “Segrest et al. (1990) Proteins: Structure, Function, and Genetics 8: 103-117).
The term “ameliorating” when used with respect to “ameliorating one or more symptoms of atherosclerosis” refers to a reduction, prevention, or elimination of one or more symptoms characteristic of atherosclerosis and/or associated pathologies. Such a reduction includes, but is not limited to a reduction or elimination of oxidized phospholipids, a reduction in atherosclerotic plaque formation and rupture, a reduction in clinical events such as heart attack, angina, or stroke, a decrease in hypertension, a decrease in inflammatory protein biosynthesis, reduction in plasma cholesterol, and the like. “Ameliorating one or more symptoms of atherosclerosis” can also refer to improving blood flow to vascular beds affected by atherosclerosis.
The term “enantiomeric amino acids” refers to amino acids that can exist in at least two forms that are nonsuperimposable mirror images of each other. Most amino acids (except glycine) are enantiomeric and exist in a so-called L-form (L amino acid) or D-form (D amino acid). Most naturally occurring amino acids are “L” amino acids. The terms “D amino acid” and “L amino acid” are used to refer to absolute configuration of the amino acid, rather than a particular direction of rotation of plane-polarized light. The usage herein is consistent with standard usage by those of skill in the art.
The term “protecting group” refers to a chemical group that, when attached to a functional group in an amino acid (e.g. a side chain, an alpha amino group, an alpha carboxyl group, etc.) blocks or masks the properties of that functional group. Preferred amino-terminal protecting groups include, but are not limited to acetyl, or amino groups. Other amino-terminal protecting groups include, but are not limited to alkyl chains as in fatty acids, propionyl, formyl and others. Preferred carboxyl terminal protecting groups include, but are not limited to groups that form amides or esters.
The phrase “protect a phospholipid from oxidation by an oxidizing agent” refers to the ability of a compound to reduce the rate of oxidation of a phospholipid (or the amount of oxidized phospholipid produced) when that phospholipid is contacted with an oxidizing agent (e.g. hydrogen peroxide, 13-(S)-HPODE, 15-(S)-HPETE, HPODE, HPETE, HODE, HETE, etc.).
The terms “low density lipoprotein” or “LDL” is defined in accordance with common usage of those of skill in the art. Generally, LDL refers to the lipid-protein complex which when isolated by ultracentrifugation is found in the density range d=1.019 to d=1.063.
The terms “high density lipoprotein” or “HDL” is defined in accordance with common usage of those of skill in the art. Generally “HDL” refers to a lipid-protein complex which when isolated by ultracentrifugation is found in the density range of d=1.063 to d=1.21.
The term “Group I HDL” refers to a high density lipoprotein or components thereof (e.g. ApoA-I, paraoxonase, platelet activating factor acetylhydrolase, etc.) that reduce oxidized lipids (e.g. in low density lipoproteins) or that protect oxidized lipids from oxidation by oxidizing agents.
The term “Group II HDL” refers to an HDL that offers reduced activity or no activity in protecting lipids from oxidation or in repairing (e.g. reducing) oxidized lipids.
The term “HDL component” refers to a component (e.g. molecules) that comprises a high density lipoprotein (HDL). Assays for HDL that protect lipids from oxidation or that repair (e.g. reduce oxidized lipids) also include assays for components of HDL (e.g. ApoA-I, paraoxonase, platelet activating factor acetylhydrolase, etc.) that display such activity.
The term “human ApoA-I peptide” refers to a full-length human ApoA-I peptide or to a fragment or domain thereof comprising a class A amphipathic helix.
A “monocytic reaction” as used herein refers to monocyte activity characteristic of the “inflammatory response” associated with atherosclerotic plaque formation. The monocytic reaction is characterized by monocyte adhesion to cells of the vascular wall (e.g. cells of the vascular endothelium), and/or chemotaxis into the subendothelial space, and/or differentiation of monocytes into macrophages.
The term “absence of change” when referring to the amount of oxidized phospholipid refers to the lack of a detectable change, more preferably the lack of a statistically significant change (e.g. at least at the 85%, preferably at least at the 90%, more preferably at least at the 95%, and most preferably at least at the 98% or 99% confidence level). The absence of a detectable change can also refer to assays in which oxidized phospholipid level changes, but not as much as in the absence of the protein(s) described herein or with reference to other positive or negative controls.
The following abbreviations are used herein: PAPC: L-α-1-palmitoyl-2-arachidonoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine; POVPC: 1-palmitoyl-2-(5-oxovaleryl)-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine; PGPC: 1-palmitoyl-2-glutaryl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine; PEIPC: 1-palmitoyl-2-(5,6-epoxyisoprostane E2)-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine; ChC18:2: cholesteryl linoleate; ChC18:2-OOH: cholesteryl linoleate hydroperoxide; DMPC: 1,2-ditetradecanoyl-rac-glycerol-3-phosphocholine; PON: paraoxonase; HPF: Standardized high power field; PAPC: L-α-1-palmitoyl-2-arachidonoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine; POVPC: 1-palmitoyl-2-(5-oxovaleryl)-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine; PGPC: 1-palmitoyl-2-glutaryl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine; PEIPC: 1-palmitoyl-2-(5,6-epoxyisoprostane E2)-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine; PON: paraoxonase; BL/6: C57BL/6J; C3H:C3H/HeJ.
The term “conservative substitution” is used in reference to proteins or peptides to reflect amino acid substitutions that do not substantially alter the activity (specificity (e.g. for lipoproteins))or binding affinity (e.g. for lipids or lipoproteins)) of the molecule. Typically conservative amino acid substitutions involve substitution one amino acid for another amino acid with similar chemical properties (e.g. charge or hydrophobicity). The following six groups each contain amino acids that are typical conservative substitutions for one another: 1) Alanine (A), Serine (S), Threonine (T); 2) Aspartic acid (D), Glutamic acid (E); 3) Asparagine (N), Glutamine (Q); 4) Arginine (R), Lysine (K); 5) Isoleucine (I), Leucine (L), Methionine (M), Valine (V); and 6) Phenylalanine (F), Tyrosine (Y), Tryptophan (W).
The terms “identical” or percent “identity,” in the context of two or more nucleic acids or polypeptide sequences, refer to two or more sequences or subsequences that are the same or have a specified percentage of amino acid residues or nucleotides that are the same, when compared and aligned for maximum correspondence, as measured using one of the following sequence comparison algorithms or by visual inspection. With respect to the peptides of this invention sequence identity is determined over the full length of the peptide.
For sequence comparison, typically one sequence acts as a reference sequence, to which test sequences are compared. When using a sequence comparison algorithm, test and reference sequences are input into a computer, subsequence coordinates are designated, if necessary, and sequence algorithm program parameters are designated. The sequence comparison algorithm then calculates the percent sequence identity for the test sequence(s) relative to the reference sequence, based on the designated program parameters.
Optimal alignment of sequences for comparison can be conducted, e.g., by the local homology algorithm of Smith & Waterman, Adv. Appl. Math. 2:482 (1981), by the homology alignment algorithm of Needleman & Wunsch, J. Mol. Biol. 48:443 (1970), by the search for similarity method of Pearson & Lipman (1988) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85:2444, by computerized implementations of these algorithms (GAP, BESTFIT, FASTA, and TFASTA in the Wisconsin Genetics Software Package, Genetics Computer Group, 575 Science Dr., Madison, Wis.), or by visual inspection (see generally Ausubel et al., supra).
One example of a useful algorithm is PILEUP. PILEUP creates a multiple sequence alignment from a group of related sequences using progressive, pairwise alignments to show relationship and percent sequence identity. It also plots a tree or dendogram showing the clustering relationships used to create the alignment. PILEUP uses a simplification of the progressive alignment method of Feng & Doolittle (1987) J. Mol. Evol. 35:351-360. The method used is similar to the method described by Higgins & Sharp (1989) CABIOS 5: 151-153. The program can align up to 300 sequences, each of a maximum length of 5,000 nucleotides or amino acids. The multiple alignment procedure begins with the pairwise alignment of the two most similar sequences, producing a cluster of two aligned sequences. This cluster is then aligned to the next most related sequence or cluster of aligned sequences. Two clusters of sequences are aligned by a simple extension of the pairwise alignment of two individual sequences. The final alignment is achieved by a series of progressive, pairwise alignments. The program is run by designating specific sequences and their amino acid or nucleotide coordinates for regions of sequence comparison and by designating the program parameters. For example, a reference sequence can be compared to other test sequences to determine the percent sequence identity relationship using the following parameters: default gap weight (3.00), default gap length weight (0.10), and weighted end gaps.
Another example of algorithm that is suitable for determining percent sequence identity and sequence similarity is the BLAST algorithm, which is described in Altschul et al. (1990) J. Mol. Biol. 215: 403-410. Software for performing BLAST analyses is publicly available through the National Center for Biotechnology Information (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). This algorithm involves first identifying high scoring sequence pairs (HSPs) by identifying short words of length W in the query sequence, which either match or satisfy some positive-valued threshold score T when aligned with a word of the same length in a database sequence. T is referred to as the neighborhood word score threshold (Altschul et al, supra). These initial neighborhood word hits act as seeds for initiating searches to find longer HSPs containing them. The word hits are then extended in both directions along each sequence for as far as the cumulative alignment score can be increased. Cumulative scores are calculated using, for nucleotide sequences, the parameters M (reward score for a pair of matching residues; always >0) and N (penalty score for mismatching residues; always <0). For amino acid sequences, a scoring matrix is used to calculate the cumulative score. Extension of the word hits in each direction are halted when: the cumulative alignment score falls off by the quantity X from its maximum achieved value; the cumulative score goes to zero or below, due to the accumulation of one or more negative-scoring residue alignments; or the end of either sequence is reached. The BLAST algorithm parameters W, T, and X determine the sensitivity and speed of the alignment. The BLASTN program (for nucleotide sequences) uses as defaults a wordlength (W) of 11, an expectation (E) of 10, M=5, N=−4, and a comparison of both strands. For amino acid sequences, the BLASTP program uses as defaults a wordlength (W) of 3, an expectation (E) of 10, and the BLOSUM62 scoring matrix (see Henikoff & Henikoff (1989) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89:10915).
In addition to calculating percent sequence identity, the BLAST algorithm also performs a statistical analysis of the similarity between two sequences (see, e.g., Karlin & Altschul (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 90: 5873-5787). One measure of similarity provided by the BLAST algorithm is the smallest sum probability (P(N)), which provides an indication of the probability by which a match between two nucleotide or amino acid sequences would occur by chance. For example, a nucleic acid is considered similar to a reference sequence if the smallest sum probability in a comparison of the test nucleic acid to the reference nucleic acid is less than about 0.1, more preferably less than about 0.01, and most preferably less than about 0.001.
The term “D-18A peptide” refers to a peptide having the sequence: D-W-L-K-A-F-Y-D-K-V-A-E-K-L-K-E-A-F (SEQ ID NO: 1) where all of the enantiomeric amino acids are D form amino acids.
The term “coadministering” or “concurrent administration”, when used, for example with respect to a peptide of this invention and another active agent (e.g. a statin), refers to administration of the peptide and the active agent such that both can simultaneously achieve a physiological effect. The two agents, however, need not be administered together. In certain embodiments, administration of one agent can precede administration of the other, however, such coadministering typically results in both agents being simultaneously present in the body (e.g. in the plasma) at a significant fraction (e.g. 20% or greater, preferably 30% or 40% or greater, more preferably 50% or 60% or greater, most preferably 70% or 80% or 90% or greater) of their maximum serum concentration for any given dose.
The term “detoxify” when used with respect to lipids, LDL, or HDL refers the removal of some or all oxidizing lipids and/or oxidized lipids. Thus, for example, the uptake of all or some HPODE and/or HPETE (both hydroperoxides on fatty acids) will prevent or reduce entrance of these peroxides into LDLs and thus prevent or reduce LDL oxidation.
The term “pre-beta high density lipoprotein-like particles” typically refers to cholesterol containing particles that also contain apoA-I and which are smaller and relatively lipid-poor compared to the lipid: protein ratio in the majority of HDL particles. When plasma is separated by FPLC, these “pre-beta high density lipoprotein-like particles” are found in the FPLC fractions containing particles smaller than those in the main HDL peak and are located to the right of HDL in an FPLC chromatogram as shown in the accompanying
The phrase “reverse lipid transport and detoxification” refers to the removal of lipids including cholesterol, other sterols including oxidized sterols, phospholipids, oxidizing agents, and oxidized phospholipids from tissues such as arteries and transport out of these peripheral tissues to organs where they can be detoxified and excreted such as excretion by the liver into bile and excretion by the kidneys into urine. Detoxification also refers to preventing the formation and/or destroying oxidized phospholipids as explained herein.
The term “biological sample” as used herein refers to any sample obtained from a living organism or from an organism that has died. Examples of biological samples include body fluids, tissue specimens, cells and cell lines taken from an organism (e.g. a human or non-human mammal).
This invention pertains to the discovery that synthetic peptides designed to mimic the class A amphipathic helical motif (Segrest et al. (1990) Proteins: Structure, Function, and Genetics 8: 103-117) are able to associate with phospholipids and exhibit many biological properties similar to human apo-A-I. In particular, it was a discovery of this invention that when such peptides are formulated using D amino acids, the peptides show dramatically elevated serum half-lives and, particularly when the amino and/or carboxy termini are blocked, can even be orally administered.
It was also a surprising discovery that these peptides can stimulate the formation and cycling of pre-beta high density lipoprotein-like particles. In addition, the peptides are capable of enhancing/synergizing the effect of statins allowing statins to be administered as significantly lower dosages or to be significantly more anti-inflammatory at any given dose. It was also discovered that the peptides described herein can inhibit and/or prevent and/or treat one or more symptoms of osteoporosis.
Moreover, it was a surprising discovery of this invention that such D-form peptides retain the biological activity of the corresponding L-form peptide. In vivo animal studies using such D-form peptides showed effective oral delivery, elevated serum half-life, and the ability to mitigate or prevent/inhibit one or more symptoms of atherosclerosis.
I. Stimulating the Formation and Cycling of Pre-beta High Density Lipoprotein-like Particles.
Reverse cholesterol transport is considered to be important in preventing the build up of lipids that predisposes to atherosclerosis (Shah et al. (2001) Circulation, 103: 3047-3050.) Many have believed the lipid of consequence is cholesterol. Our laboratory has shown that the key lipids are oxidized phospholipids that initiate the inflammatory response in atherosclerosis (Navab et al. (2001) Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol., 21(4): 481-488; Van Lenten et al. (001) Trends Cardiovasc Med, 11: 155-161; Navab M et al. (2001) Circulation, 104: 2386-2387).
This inflammatory response is also likely responsible for plaque erosion or rupture that leads to heart attack and stroke. HDL-cholesterol levels are inversely correlated with risk for heart attack and stroke (Downs et al. (1998) JAMA 279: 1615-1622; Gordon et al. (1977) Am J Med., 62: 707-714; Castelli et al. (1986) JAMA, 256: 2835-2838).
Pre-beta HDL is generally considered to be the most active HDL fraction in promoting reverse cholesterol transport (e.g., picking up cholesterol from peripheral tissues such as arteries and carrying it to the liver for excretion into the bile; see, Fielding and Fielding (2001) Biochim Biophys Acta, 1533(3): 175-189). However, levels of pre-beta HDL can be increased because of a failure of the pre-beta HDL to be cycled into mature alpha-migrating HDL e.g. LCAT deficiency or inhibition (O'Connor et al. (1998) J Lipid Res, 39: 670-678). High levels of pre-beta HDL have been reported in coronary artery disease patients (Miida et al. (1996) Clin Chem., 42: 1992-1995).
Moreover, men have been found to have higher levels of pre-beta HDL than women but the risk of men for coronary heart disease is greater than for women (O'Connor et al. (1998) J Lipid Res., 39: 670-678). Thus, static measurements of pre-beta HDL levels themselves are not necessarily predictive of risk for coronary artery disease. The cycling, however, of cholesterol through pre-beta HDL into mature HDL is universally considered to be protective against atherosclerosis (Fielding and Fielding (2001) Biochim Biophys Acta, 1533(3): 175-189). Moreover, we have demonstrated that the removal of oxidized lipids from artery wall cells through this pathway protects against LDL oxidation.
As described herein in Example 1, despite relatively low absorption rates when orally administered, the peptides of this invention (e.g. D-4F) were highly active.
In studies of Apo-E null mice orally administered D-4F, we determined that 20 min after absorption from the intestine, D-4F forms small pre-beta HDL-like particles that contain relatively high amounts of apoA-I and paraoxonase. Indeed, estimating the amount of apoA-I in these pre-beta HDL-like particles from Western blots and comparing the amount of apoA-I to the amount of D-4F in these particles (determined by radioactivity or LC-MRM) suggests that as D-4F is absorbed from the intestine, it acts as a catalyst causing the formation of these pre-beta HDL-like particles. This small amount of intestinally derived D-4F appears to recruit amounts of apoA-I, paraoxonase, and cholesterol into these particles that are orders of magnitude more than the amount of D-4F.
Thus, following absorption, D-4F rapidly recruits relatively large amounts of apoA-I and paraoxonase to form pre-beta HDL-like particles which are very likely the most potent particles for both promoting reverse cholesterol transport and for destroying biologically active oxidized lipids. We believe that the formation of these particles and their subsequent rapid incorporation into mature HDL likely explains the dramatic reduction in atherosclerosis that we observed in LDL receptor null mice on a Western diet and in apoE-null mice on a chow diet independent of changes in plasma cholesterol or HDL-cholesterol.
Thus, in one embodiment, this invention provides methods of stimulating the formation and cycling of pre-beta high density lipoprotein-like particles by administration of one or more peptides as described herein. The peptides can thereby promote lipid transport and detoxification.
II. Synergizing the Activity of Statins.
As demonstrated in Example 2, adding a low dosage of D-4F (1 μg/ml) to the drinking water of apoE null mice for 24 hours did not significantly improve HDL function (see, e.g.,
Thus, doses of D-4F alone, or statins alone, which by themselves had no effect on HDL function when given together acted synergistically. When D-4F and a statin were given together to apo E null mice, their pro-inflammatory HDL at 50 μg/ml of HDL-cholesterol became as effective as normal human HDL at 350 μg/ml of HDL-cholesterol in preventing the inflammatory response induced by the action of HPODE oxidizing PAPC in cocultures of human artery wall cells.
Thus, in certain embodiments this invention provides methods for enhancing the activity of statins. The methods generally involve administering one or more peptides as described herein concurrently with one or more statins. The D-4F or other similar peptides as described herein achieve synergistic action between the statin and the orally peptide(s) to ameliorate atherosclerosis. In this context statins can be administered at significantly lower dosages thereby avoiding various harmful side effects (e.g. muscle wasting) associated with high dosage statin use and/or the anti-inflammatory properties of statins at any given dose are significantly enhanced.
III. Inhibiting/Treating Osteoporosis.
Vascular calcification and osteoporosis often co-exist in the same subjects (Ouchi et al. (1993) Ann NY Acad Sci., 676: 297-307; Boukhris and Becker ('1972) JAMA, 219: 1307-1311; Banks et al. (1994) Eur J Clin Invest., 24: 813-817; Laroche et al. (1994) Clin Rheumatol., 13: 611-614; Broulik and Kapitola (1993) Endocr Regul., 27: 57-60; Frye et al. (1992) Bone Mine., 19: 185-194; Barengolts et al. (1998) Calcif Tissue Int., 62: 209-213; Burnett and Vasikaran (2002) Ann Clin Biochem., 39: 203-210. Parhami et al. (Parhami et al. (1997) Arterioscl Thromb Vasc Biol., 17: 680-687) demonstrated that mildly oxidized LDL (MM-LDL) and the biologically active lipids in MM-LDL [i.e. oxidized 1-palmitoyl-2-arachidonoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphorylcholine) (Ox-PAPC)], as well as the isoprostane, 8-iso prostaglandin E2, but not the unoxidized phospholipid (PAPC) or isoprostane 8-iso progstaglandin F2α induced alkaline phosphatase activity and osteoblastic differentiation of calcifying vascular cells (CVCs) in vitro, but inhibited the differentiation of MC3T3-E1 bone cells.
The osteon resembles the artery wall in that the osteon is centered on an endothelial cell-lined lumen surrounded by a subendothelial space containing matrix and fibroblast-like cells, which is in turn surrounded by preosteoblasts and osteoblasts occupying a position analogous to smooth muscle cells in the artery wall (Id.). Trabecular bone osteoblasts also interface with bone marrow subendothelial spaces (Id.). Parhami et al. postulated that lipoproteins could cross the endothelium of bone arteries and be deposited in the subendothelial space where they could undergo oxidation as in coronary arteries (Id.). Based on their in vitro data they predicted that LDL oxidation in the subendothelial space of bone arteries and in bone marrow would lead to reduced osteoblastic differentiation and mineralization which would contribute to osteoporosis (Id.). Their hypothesis further predicted that LDL levels would be positively correlated with osteoporosis as they are with coronary calcification (Pohle et al. (2001) Circulation, 104: 1927-1932) but HDL levels would be negatively correlated with osteoporosis (Parhami et al. (1997) Arterioscl Thromb Vasc Biol., 17: 680-687).
In vitro, the osteoblastic differentiation of the marrow stromal cell line M2-10B4 was inhibited by MM-LDL but not native LDL (Parhami et al. (1999) J Bone Miner Res., 14: 2067-2078). When marrow stromal cells from atherosclerosis susceptible C57BL/6 (BL6) mice fed a low fat chow diet were cultured there was robust osteogenic differentiation (Id.). In contrast, when the marrow stromal cells taken from the mice after a high fat, atherogenic diet were cultured they did not undergo osteogenic differentiation (Id.). This observation is particularly important since it provides a possible explanation for the decreased osteogenic potential of marrow stromal cells in the development of osteoporosis (Nuttall and Gimble (2000) Bone, 27: 177-184). In vivo the decrease in osteogenic potential is accompanied by an increase in adipogenesis in osteoporotic bone (Id.).
It was found that adding D-4F to the drinking water of apoE null mice for 6 weeks dramatically increased trabecular bone mineral density (Example 3).
The data indicate that osteoporosis can be regarded as an “atherosclerosis of bone”. It appears to be a result of the action of oxidized lipids. HDL destroys these oxidized lipids and promotes osteoblastic differentiation. The data illustrated in Example 3 indicate that administering peptide(s) of this invention to a mammal (e.g. in the drinking water of apoE null mice) dramatically increases trabecular bone in just a matter of weeks.
This indicates that the peptides described herein are useful for mitigation one or more symptoms of atherosclerosis (e.g. for inhibiting decalcification) or for inducing recalcification of osteoporotic bone. The peptides are also useful as prophylactics to prevent the onset of symptom(s) of osteoporosis in a mammal (e.g. a patient at risk for osteoporosis).
IV. Mitigation of a Symptom of Atherosclerosis.
We discovered that normal HDL inhibits three steps in the formation of mildly oxidized LDL. In those studies (see, copending application U.S. Ser. No. 09/541,468, filed on Mar. 31, 2000) we demonstrated that treating human LDL in vitro with ApoA-I or an ApoA-I mimetic peptide (37pA) removed seeding molecules from the LDL that included HPODE and HPETE. These seeding molecules were required for cocultures of human artery wall cells to be able to oxidize LDL and for the LDL to induce the artery wall cells to produce monocyte chemotactic activity. We also demonstrated that after injection of ApoA-I into mice or infusion into humans, the LDL isolated from the mice or human volunteers after injection/infusion of ApoA-I was resistant to oxidation by human artery wall cells and did not induce monocyte chemotactic activity in the artery wall cell cocultures.
The protective function of the D peptides of this invention is illustrated in the parent applications (Ser. No. 09/645,454, filed Aug. 24, 2000, Ser. No. 09/896,841, filed Jun. 29, 2001, and WO 02/15923 (PCT/US01/26497), filed Jun. 29, 2001, see, e.g., FIGS. 1-5 in WO 02/15923. FIG. 1, panels A, B, C, and D in WO 02/15923 show the association of 14C-D-5F with blood components in an ApoE null mouse. It is also demonstrated that HDL from mice that were fed an atherogenic diet and injected with PBS failed to inhibit the oxidation of human LDL and failed to inhibit LDL-induced monocyte chemotactic activity in human artery wall coculures. In contrast, HDL from mice fed an atherogenic diet and injected daily with peptides described herein was as effective in inhibiting human LDL oxidation and preventing LDL-induced monocyte chemotactic activity in the cocultures as was normal human HDL (FIGS. 2A and 2B in WO 02/15923). In addition, LDL taken from mice fed the atherogenic diet and injected daily with PBS was more readily oxidized and more readily induced monocyte chemotactic activity than LDL taken from mice fed the same diet but injected with 20 μg daily of peptide 5F. The D peptide did not appear to be immunogenic (FIG. 4 in WO 02/15923).
The in vitro responses of human artery wall cells to HDL and LDL from mice fed the atherogenic diet and injected with a peptide according to this invention are consistent with the protective action shown by such peptides in vivo. Despite, similar levels of total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, IDL+VLDL-cholesterol, and lower HDL-cholesterol as a percent of total cholesterol, the animals fed the atherogenic diet and injected with the peptide had significantly lower lesion scores (FIG. 5 in WO 02/15923). The peptides of this invention thus prevented progression of atherosclerotic lesions in mice fed an atherogenic diet.
Thus, in one embodiment, this invention provides methods for ameliorating and/or preventing one or more symptoms of atherosclerosis.
VI. Mitigation of a Symptom of Atheroscloerosis Associated with an Acute Inflammatory Response.
The peptides of this invention are also useful in a number of contexts. For example, we have observed that cardiovascular complications (e.g. atherosclerosis, stroke, etc.) frequently accompany or follow the onset of an acute phase inflammatory response. Such an acute state inflammatory response is often associated with a recurrent inflammatory disease (e.g., leprosy, tuberculosis, systemic lupus erythematosus, and rheumatoid arthritis), a viral infection (e.g. influenza), a bacterial infection, a fungal infection, an organ transplant, a wound or other trauma, an implanted prosthesis, a biofilm, and the like.
It was a surprising discovery of this invention that administration of one or more of the peptides described herein, can reduce or prevent the formation of oxidized phospholipids during or following an acute phase response and thereby mitigate or eliminate cardiovascular complications associated with such a condition.
Thus, for example, we have demonstrated that a consequence of influenza infection is the diminution in paraoxonase and platelet activating acetylhydrolase activity in the HDL. Without being bound by a particular theory, we believe that, as a result of the loss of these HDL enzymatic activities and also as a result of the association of pro-oxidant proteins with HDL during the acute phase response, HDL is no longer able to prevent LDL oxidation and was no longer able to prevent the LDL-induced production of monocyte chemotactic activity by endothelial cells.
We observed that in a subject injected with very low dosages of the polypeptides of this invention (e.g. 20 micrograms for mice) daily after infection with the influenza A virus paraoxonase levels did not fall and the biologically active oxidized phospholipids were not generated beyond background. This indicates that D-4F (and/or other peptides of this invention) can be administered (e.g. orally or by injection) to patients with known coronary artery disease during influenza infection or other events that can generate an acute phase inflammatory response (e.g. due to viral infection, bacterial infection, trauma, transplant, various autoimmune conditions, etc.) and thus we can prevent by this short term treatment the increased incidence of heart attack and stroke associated with pathologies that generate such inflammatory states.
Thus, in certain embodiments, this invention contemplates administering one or more of the peptides of this invention to a subject at risk for, or incurring, an acute inflammatory response and/or at risk for or incurring a symptom of atherosclerosis.
Thus, for example, a person having or at risk for coronary disease may prophylactically be administered a polypeptide of this invention during flu season. A person (or animal) subject to a recurrent inflammatory condition, e.g. rheumatoid arthritis, various autoimmune diseases, etc., can be treated with a polypeptide of this invention to mitigate or prevent the development of atherosclerosis or stroke. A person (or animal) subject to trauma, e.g. acute injury, tissue transplant, etc. can be treated with a polypeptide of this invention to mitigate the development of atherosclerosis or stroke.
In certain instances such methods will entail a diagnosis of the occurrence or risk of an acute inflammatory response. The acute inflammatory response typically involves alterations in metabolism and gene regulation in the liver. It is a dynamic homeostatic process that involves all of the major systems of the body, in addition to the immune, cardiovascular and central nervous system. Normally, the acute phase response lasts only a few days; however, in cases of chronic or recurring inflammation, an aberrant continuation of some aspects of the acute phase response may contribute to the underlying tissue damage that accompanies the disease, and may also lead to further complications, for example cardiovascular diseases or protein deposition diseases such as amyloidosis.
An important aspect of the acute phase response is the radically altered biosynthetic profile of the liver. Under normal circumstances, the liver synthesizes a characteristic range of plasma proteins at steady state concentrations. Many of these proteins have important functions and higher plasma levels of these acute phase reactants (APRs) or acute phase proteins (APPs) are required during the acute phase response following an inflammatory stimulus. Although most APRs are synthesized by hepatocytes, some are produced by other cell types, including monocytes, endothelial cells, fibroblasts and adipocytes. Most APRs are induced between 50% and several-fold over normal levels. In contrast, the major APRs can increase to 1000-fold over normal levels. This group includes serum amyloid A (SAA) and either C-reactive protein (CRP) in humans or its homologue in mice, serum amyloid P component (SAP). So-called negative APRs are decreased in plasma concentration during the acute phase response to allow an increase in the capacity of the liver to synthesize the induced APRs.
In certain embodiments, the acute phase response, or risk therefore is evaluated by measuring one or more APPS. Measuring such markers is well known to those of skill in the art, and commercial companies exist that provide such measurement (e.g. AGP measured by Cardiotech Services, Louisville, Ky.).
VII. Mitigation of a Symptom or Condition Associated with Coronary Calcification and Osteoporosis.
We have also identified oxidized lipids as a cause of coronary calcification and osteoporosis. Moreover, without being bound to a particularly theory, we believe the same mechanisms are involved in the pathogenesis of calcific aortic stenosis.
Thus, in certain embodiments, this invention contemplates the use of the peptides described herein to inhibit or prevent a symptom of a disease such as polymyalgia rheumatica, polyarteritis nodosa, scleroderma, lupus erythematosus, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Alzheimers Disease, AIDS, coronary calcification, calcific aortic stenosis, osteoporosis, and the like.
V. Peptide Administration.
The methods of this invention typically involve administering to an organism, preferably a mammal, more preferably a human one or more of the peptides of this invention (or mimetics of such peptides). The peptide(s) can be administered, as described herein, according to any of a number of standard methods including, but not limited to injection, suppository, nasal spray, time-release implant, transdermal patch, and the like. In one particularly preferred embodiment, the peptide(s) are administered orally (e.g. as a syrup, capsule, or tablet).
The methods can involve the administration of a single peptide of this invention or the administration of two or more different peptides. The peptides can be provided as monomers or in dimeric, oligomeric or polymeric forms. In certain embodiments, the multimeric forms may comprise associated monomers (e.g. ionically or hydrophobically linked) while certain other multimeric forms comprise covalently linked monomers (directly linked or through a linker).
While the invention is described with respect to use in humans, it is also suitable for animal, e.g. veterinary use. Thus preferred organisms include, but are not limited to humans, non-human primates, canines, equines, felines, porcines, ungulates, largomorphs, and the like.
The methods of this invention are not limited to humans or non-human animals showing one or more symptom(s) of atherosclerosis (e.g. hypertension, plaque formation and rupture, reduction in clinical events such as heart attack, angina, or stroke, high levels of plasma cholesterol, high levels of low density lipoprotein, high levels of very low density lipoprotein, or inflammatory proteins such as CRP, etc.), but are useful in a prophylactic context. Thus, the peptides of this invention (or mimetics thereof) may be administered to organisms to prevent the onset/development of one or more symptoms of atherosclerosis. Particularly preferred subjects in this context are subjects showing one or more risk factors for atherosclerosis (e.g. family history, hypertension, obesity, high alcohol consumption, smoking, high blood cholesterol, high blood triglycerides, elevated blood LDL, VLDL, IDL, or low HDL, diabetes, or a family history of diabetes, high blood lipids, heart attack, angina or stroke, etc.).
The peptides of this invention can also be administered to stimulate the formation and cycling of pre-beta high density lipoprotein-like particles and/or to promote reverse lipid transport and detoxification.
The peptides are also useful for administration with statins where they enhance (e.g., synergize) the activity of the statin and permit the statin(s) to be administered at lower dosages and/or the anti-inflammatory properties of statins at any given dose are significantly enhanced.
In addition, the peptides can be administered to reduce or eliminate one or more symptoms of osteoporosis and/or to prevent/inhibit the onset of one or more symptoms of osteoporosis.
VIII. Preferred Peptides and Their Preparation.
It was a discovery of this invention that peptides comprising a class A amphipathic helix (“class A peptides”), are capable of mitigating one or more symptoms of atherosclerosis. Class A peptides are characterized by formation of an α-helix that produces a segregation of polar and non-polar residues thereby forming a polar and a nonpolar face with the positively charged residues residing at the polar-nonpolar interface and the negatively charged residues residing at the center of the polar face (see, e.g., Anantharamaiah (1986) Meth. Enzymol, 128: 626-668). It is noted that the fourth exon of ApoA-I, when folded into 3.667 residues/turn produces a class A amphipathic helical structure.
One particularly preferred class A peptide, designated 18A (see, 1, and also Anantharamaiah (1986) Meth. Enzymol, 128: 626-668) was modified as described herein to produce peptides orally administratable and highly effective at inhibiting or preventing one or more symptoms of atherosclerosis. Without being bound by a particular theory, it is believed that the peptides of this invention act in vivo may by picking up seeding molecule(s) that mitigate oxidation of LDL.
We determined that increasing the number of Phe residues on the hydrophobic face of 18A would theoretically increase lipid affinity as determined by the computation described by Palgunachari et al. (1996) Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, & Vascular Biology 16: 328-338. Theoretically, a systematic substitution of residues in the nonpolar face of 18A with Phe could yield six peptides. Peptides with an additional 2, 3 and 4 Phe would have theoretical lipid affinity (λ) values of 13, 14 and 15 units, respectively. However, the λ values jumped four units if the additional Phe were increased from 4 to 5 (to 19 λ units). Increasing to 6 or 7 Phe would produce a less dramatic increase (to 20 and 21 λ units, respectively). Therefore, we chose 5 additional Phe (and hence the peptides designation as SF). In one particularly preferred embodiment, the SF peptide was blocked in that the amino terminal residue was acetylated and the carboxyl terminal residue was amidated.
The new class A peptide analog, 5F, inhibited lesion development in atherosclerosis-susceptible mice. The new peptide analog, 5F, was compared with mouse ApoA-I (MoA-I) for efficacy in inhibiting diet-induced atherosclerosis in these mice using peptide dosages based on the study by Levine et al. (Levine et al. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90:12040-12044).
A number of other class A peptides were also produced and showed varying, but significant degrees of efficacy in mitigating one or more symptoms of atherosclerosis. A number of such peptides are illustrated in Table 1.
Preferred peptides for use in this invention.
Amino Acid Sequence
D-W-L-K-A-F-Y-D-K-V-A-E-K-L-K-E-A-F -P- D-W-
D-W-L-K-A-F-Y-D-K-V-A-E-K-L-K-E-F-F -P- D-W-
D-W-F-K-A-F-Y-D-K-V-A-E-K-L-K-E-A-F -P- D-W-
D-K-L-K-A-F-Y-D-K-V-F-E-W-A-K-E-A-F -P- D-K-
D-K-W-K-A-V-Y-D-K-F-A-E-A-F-K-E-F-L -P- D-K-
D-W-F-K-A-F-Y-D-K-V-A-E-K-F-K-E-A-F -P- D-W-
D-W-L-K-A-F-V-Y-D-K-V-F-K-L-K-E-F-F -P- D-W-
D-W-L-K-A-F-Y-D-K-F-A-E-K-F-K-E-F-F -P- D-W-
1Linkers are underlined.
NMA is N-Methyl Anthranilyl.
In certain preferred embodiments, the peptides include variations of 4F or D-4F where one or both aspartic acids (D) are replaced by glutamic acid (E). Also contemplated are peptides (e.g. 4F or D-4F) where 1, 2, 3, or 4 amino acids are deleted from the carboxyl terminus and/or 1, 2, 3, or 4 amino acids are deleted from the carboxyl terminus and/or one or both aspartic acids (D) are replaced by glutamic acid (E). In any of the peptides described herein, the N-terminus can be blocked and labeled using a mantyl moiety (e.g. N-methylanthranilyl).
While various peptides of 1, are illustrated with an acetyl group or an N-methylanthranilyl group protecting the amino terminus and an amide group protecting the carboxyl terminus, any of these protecting groups may be eliminated and/or substituted with another protecting group as described herein. In particularly preferred embodiments, the peptides comprise one or more D-form amino acids as described herein. In certain embodiments, every amino acid (e.g. every enantiomeric amino acid) of the peptides of Table 1 is a D-form amino acid.
It is also noted that 1 is not fully inclusive. Using the teaching provided herein, other suitable peptides can routinely be produced (e.g. by conservative or semi-conservative substitutions (e.g. D replaced by E), extensions, deletions, and the like). Thus, for example, one embodiment utilizes truncations of any one or more of peptides identified by SEQ ID Nos:2-20 and 39-85. Thus, for example, SEQ ID NO: 21 illustrates a peptide comprising 14 amino acids from the C-terminus of 18A comprising one or more D amino acids, while SEQ ID NOS:22-38 illustrate other truncations. Longer peptides are also suitable. Such longer peptides may entirely form a class A amphipathic helix, or the class A amphipathic helix (helices) may form one or more domains of the peptide. In addition, this invention contemplates multimeric versions of the peptides. Thus, for example, the peptides illustrated in 1 can be coupled together (directly or through a linker (e.g. a carbon linker, or one or more amino acids) with one or more intervening amino acids). Illustrative polymeric peptides include 18A-Pro-18A and the peptides of SEQ ID NOs:79-85 preferably comprising one or more D amino acids, more preferably with every amino acid a D amino acid as described herein and/or having one or both termini protected.
It was a surprising discovery of this invention that, when the class A peptides (e.g. as illustrated in 1) incorporated D amino acids they retained their activity and, but could be administered orally. Moreover this oral administration resulted in relatively efficient uptake and significant serum half-life thereby providing an efficacious method of mitigating one or more symptoms of atherosclerosis.
Using the teaching provided herein, one of skill can routinely modify the illustrated class A peptides to produce other suitable class A peptides of this invention. For example, routine conservative or semi-conservative substitutions (e.g. E for D) can be made of the existing amino acids. The effect of various substitutions on lipid affinity of the resulting peptide can be predicted using the computational method described by Palgunachari et al. (1996) Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, & Vascular Biology 16: 328-338. The peptides can be lengthened or shortened as long as the class A α-helix structure is preserved. In addition, substitutions can be made to render the resulting peptide more similar to peptide(s) endogenously produced by the subject species.
In certain embodiments, the peptides of this invention comprise “D” forms of the peptides described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,643,988, more preferably “D” forms having one or both termini coupled to protecting groups. Such peptides include peptides having the formula A1-B1-B2-C1-D-B3- B4-A2-C2-B5-B6-A3-C3-B7-C4-A4-B8-B9 (SEQ ID NO:104) wherein A1, A2, A3 and A4 are independently aspartic acid or glutamic acid, or homologues or analogues thereof; B1, B2, B3, B4, B5, B6, B7, B8 and B9 are independently tryptophan, phenylalanine, alanine, leucine, tyrosine, isoleucine, valine or α-naphthylalanine, or homologues or analogues thereof; C1, C2, C3 and C4 are independently lysine or arginine, and D is serine, threonine, alanine, glycine, histidine, or homologues or analogues thereof; provided that, when A1 and A2 are aspartic acid, A3 and A4 are glutamic acid, B2 and B9 are leucine, B3 and B7 are phenylalanine, B4 is tyrosine, B5 is valine, B6, B8, and D are alanine, and C1, C2, C3 and C4 are lysine, B1 is not Tryptophan, where at one enantiomeric amino acid is a “D” form amino acids. Preferably at least 50% of the enantiomeric amino acids are “D” form, more preferably at least 80% of the enantiomeric amino acids are “D” form, and most preferably at least 90% or even all of the enantiomeric amino acids are “D” form amino acids.
While, in preferred embodiments, the peptides of this invention utilize naturally-occurring amino acids or D forms of naturally occurring amino acids, substitutions with non-naturally occurring amino acids (e.g., methionine sulfoxide, methionine methylsulfonium, norleucine, episilon-aminocaproic acid, 4-aminobutanoic acid, tetrahydroisoquinoline-3-carboxylic acid, 8-aminocaprylic acid, 4-aminobutyric acid, Lys(N(epsilon)-trifluoroacetyl), α-aminoisobutyric acid, and the like) are also contemplated.
In addition to the class A peptides described herein, peptidomimetics are also contemplated herein. Peptide analogs are commonly used in the pharmaceutical industry as non-peptide drugs with properties analogous to those of the template peptide. These types of non-peptide compound are termed “peptide mimetics” or “peptidomimetics” (Fauchere (1986) Adv. Drug Res. 15: 29; Veber and Freidinger (1985) TINS p. 392; and Evans et al. (1987) J. Med. Chem. 30: 1229) and are usually developed with the aid of computerized molecular modeling. Peptide mimetics that are structurally similar to therapeutically useful peptides may be used to produce an equivalent therapeutic or prophylactic effect.
Generally, peptidomimetics are structurally similar to a paradigm polypeptide (i.e., 5F described herein), but have one or more peptide linkages optionally replaced by a linkage selected from the group consisting of: —CH2NH—, —CH2S—, —CH2—CH2—, —CH═CH— (cis and trans), —COCH2—, —CH(OH)CH2—, —CH2SO—, etc. by methods known in the art and further described in the following references: Spatola (1983) p. 267 in Chemistry and Biochemistry of Amino Acids, Peptides, and Proteins, B. Weinstein, eds., Marcel Dekker, New York,; Spatola (1983) Vega Data 1(3) Peptide Backbone Modifications. (general review); Morley (1980) Trends Pharm Sci pp. 463-468 (general review); Hudson et al. (1979) Int J Pept Prot Res 14:177-185 (—CH2NH—, CH2CH2—); Spatola et al. (1986) Life Sci 38:1243-1249 (—CH2—S); Hann, (1982) J Chem Soc Perkin Trans I 307-314 (—CH—CH—, cis and trans); Almquist et al. (1980) J Med Chem. 23:1392-1398 (—COCH2—); Jennings-White et al.(1982) Tetrahedron Lett. 23:2533 (—COCH2—); Szelke, M. et al., European Appln. EP 45665 (1982) CA: 97:39405 (1982) (—CH(OH)CH2-); Holladay et al. (1983) Tetrahedron Lett 24:4401-4404 (—C(OH)CH2—); and Hruby (1982) Life Sci., 31:189-199 (—CH2—S—)).
A particularly preferred non-peptide linkage is —CH2NH—. Such peptide mimetics may have significant advantages over polypeptide embodiments, including, for example: more economical production, greater chemical stability, enhanced pharmacological properties (half-life, absorption, potency, efficacy, etc.), reduced antigenicity, and others.
In addition, circularly permutations of the peptides described herein or constrained peptides (including cyclized peptides) comprising a consensus sequence or a substantially identical consensus sequence variation may be generated by methods known in the art (Rizo and Gierasch (1992) Ann. Rev. Biochem. 61: 387); for example, by adding internal cysteine residues capable of forming intramolecular disulfide bridges which cyclize the peptide.
The peptides used in this invention can be chemically synthesized using standard chemical peptide synthesis techniques or, particularly where the peptide does not comprise “D” amino acid residues, the peptide can readily be recombinantly expressed. Where the “D” polypeptides are recombinantly expressed, a host organism (e.g. bacteria, plant, fungal cells, etc.) can be cultured in an environment where one or more of the amino acids is provided to the organism exclusively in a D form. Recombinantly expressed peptides in such a system then incorporate those D amino acids.
In certain embodiments, D amino acids can be incorporated in recombinantly expressed peptides using modified amino acyl-tRNA synthetases that recognize D-amino acids.
In certain preferred embodiments the peptides are chemically synthesized by any of a number of fluid or solid phase peptide synthesis techniques known to those of skill in the art. Solid phase synthesis in which the C-terminal amino acid of the sequence is attached to an insoluble support followed by sequential addition of the remaining amino acids in the sequence is a preferred method for the chemical synthesis of the polypeptides of this invention. Techniques for solid phase synthesis are well known to those of skill in the art and are described, for example, by Barany and Merrifield (1963) Solid-Phase Peptide Synthesis; pp. 3-284 in The Peptides: Analysis, Synthesis, Biology. Vol. 2: Special Methods in Peptide Synthesis, Part A.; Merrifield et al. (1963) J. Am. Chem. Soc., 85: 2149-2156, and Stewart et al. (1984) Solid Phase Peptide Synthesis, 2nd ed. Pierce Chem. Co., Rockford, Ill.
In one embodiment, the peptides are synthesized by the solid phase peptide synthesis procedure using a benzhyderylamine resin (Beckman Bioproducts, 0.59 mmol of NH2/g of resin) as the solid support. The COOH terminal amino acid (e.g., t-butylcarbonyl-Phe) is attached to the solid support through a 4-(oxymethyl)phenacetyl group. This is a more stable linkage than the conventional benzyl ester linkage, yet the finished peptide can still be cleaved by hydrogenation. Transfer hydrogenation using formic acid as the hydrogen donor is used for this purpose. Detailed protocols used for peptide synthesis and analysis of synthesized peptides are describe in a miniprint supplement accompanying Anantharamaiah et al. (1985) J. Biol. Chem., 260(16): 10248-10255.
It is noted that in the chemical synthesis of peptides, particularly peptides comprising D amino acids, the synthesis usually produces a number of truncated peptides in addition to the desired full-length product. The purification process (e.g. HPLC) typically results in the loss of a significant amount of the full-length product.
It was a discovery of this invention that, particularly in the synthesis of a D peptide (e.g. D-4), in order to prevent loss in purifying the longest form one can dialyze and use the mixture and thereby eliminate the last HPLC purification. Such a mixture loses about 50% of the potency of the highly purified product (e.g. per wt of protein product), but the mixture contains about 6 times more peptide and thus greater total activity.
D-Form Amino Acids.
D-amino acids can be incorporated at one or more positions in the peptide simply by using a D-form derivatized amino acid residue in the chemical synthesis. D-form residues for solid phase peptide synthesis are commercially available from a number of suppliers (see, e.g., Advanced Chem Tech, Louisville; Nova Biochem, San Diego; Sigma, St Louis; Bachem California Inc., Torrance, etc.). The D-form amino acids can be completely omitted or incorporated at any position in the peptide as desired. Thus, for example, in certain embodiments, the peptide can comprise a single D-amino acid, while in other embodiments, the peptide comprises at least two, generally at least three, more generally at least four, most generally at least five, preferably at least six, more preferably at least seven and most preferably at least eight D amino acids. In particularly preferred embodiments, essentially every other (enantiomeric) amino acid is a D-form amino acid. In certain embodiments at least 90%, preferably at least 90%, more preferably at least 95% of the enantiomeric amino acids are D-form amino acids. In one particularly preferred embodiment, essentially every enantiomeric amino acid is a D-form amino acid.
In certain embodiments, the one or more R-groups on the constituent amino acids and/or the terminal amino acids are blocked with a protecting group. Without being bound by a particular theory, it was a discovery of this invention that blockage, particularly of the amino and/or carboxyl termini of the subject peptides of this invention greatly improves oral delivery and significantly increases serum half-life.
A wide number of protecting groups are suitable for this purpose. Such groups include, but are not limited to acetyl, amide, and alkyl groups with acetyl and alkyl groups being particularly preferred for N-terminal protection and amide groups being preferred for carboxyl terminal protection. In certain embodiments, the blocking groups can additionally act as a detectable label (e.g. N-methyl anthranilyl).
In certain particularly preferred embodiments, the protecting groups include, but are not limited to alkyl chains as in fatty acids, propionyl, formyl, and others. Particularly preferred carboxyl protecting groups include amides, esters, and ether-forming protecting groups. In one preferred embodiment, an acetyl group is used to protect the amino terminus and an amide group is used to protect the carboxyl terminus. These blocking groups enhance the helix-forming tendencies of the peptides. Certain particularly preferred blocking groups include alkyl groups of various lengths, e.g. groups having the formula: CH3—(CH2)n—CO— where n ranges from about 1 to about 20, preferably from about 1 to about 16 or 18, more preferably from about 3 to about 13, and most preferably from about 3 to about 10.
In certain particularly preferred embodiments, the protecting groups include, but are not limited to alkyl chains as in fatty acids, propionyl, formyl, and others. Particularly preferred carboxyl protecting groups include amides, esters, and ether-forming protecting groups. In one preferred embodiment, an acetyl group is used to protect the amino terminus and an amide group is used to protect the carboxyl terminus. These blocking groups enhance the helix-forming tendencies of the peptides. Certain particularly preferred blocking groups include alkyl groups of various lengths, e.g. groups having the formula: CH3—(CH2)n—CO— where n ranges from about 3 to about 20, preferably from about 3 to about 16, more preferably from about 3 to about 13, and most preferably from about 3 to about 10.
Other protecting groups include, but are not limited to N-methyl anthranilyl, Fmoc, t-butoxycarbonyl (t-BOC), 9-fluoreneacetyl group, 1-fluorenecarboxylic group, 9-florenecarboxylic group, 9-fluorenone-1-carboxylic group, benzyloxycarbonyl, Xanthyl (Xan), Trityl (Trt), 4-methyltrityl (Mtt), 4-methoxytrityl (Mmt), 4-methoxy-2,3,6-trimethyl-benzenesulphonyl (Mtr), Mesitylene-2-sulphonyl (Mts), 4,4-dimethoxybenzhydryl (Mbh), Tosyl (Tos), 2,2,5,7,8-pentamethyl chroman-6-sulphonyl (Pmc), 4-methylbenzyl (MeBzl), 4-methoxybenzyl (MeOBzl), Benzyloxy (BzlO), Benzyl (Bzl), Benzoyl (Bz), 3-nitro-2-pyridinesulphenyl (Npys), 1-(4,4-dimentyl-2,6-diaxocyclohexylidene)ethyl (Dde), 2,6-dichlorobenzyl (2,6-DiCl-Bzl), 2-chlorobenzyloxycarbonyl (2-Cl-Z), 2-bromobenzyloxycarbonyl (2-Br-Z), Benzyloxymethyl (Bom), cyclohexyloxy (cHxO), t-butoxymethyl (Bum), t-butoxy (tBuO), t-Butyl (tBu), Acetyl (Ac), and Trifluoroacetyl (TFA).
Protecting/blocking groups are well known to those of skill as are methods of coupling such groups to the appropriate residue(s) comprising the peptides of this invention (see, e.g., Greene et al., (1991) Protective Groups in Organic Synthesis, 2nd ed., John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Somerset, N.J.). In one preferred embodiment, for example, acetylation is accomplished during the synthesis when the peptide is on the resin using acetic anhydride. Amide protection can be achieved by the selection of a proper resin for the synthesis. During the synthesis of the peptides described herein in the examples, rink amide resin was used. After the completion of the synthesis, the semipermanent protecting groups on acidic bifunctional amino acids such as Asp and Glu and basic amino acid Lys, hydroxyl of Tyr are all simultaneously removed. The peptides released from such a resin using acidic treatment comes out with the n-terminal protected as acetyl and the carboxyl protected as NH2 and with the simultaneous removal of all of the other protecting groups.
IX. Enhancing Peptide Uptake.
It was also a surprising discovery of this invention that when an all L amino acid peptide (e.g. otherwise having the sequence of the peptides of this invention) is administered in conjunction with the D-form (i.e. a peptide of this invention) the uptake of the D-form peptide is increased. Thus, in certain embodiments, this invention contemplates the use of combinations of D-form and L-form peptides in the methods of this invention. The D-form peptide and the L-form peptide can have different amino acid sequences, however, in preferred embodiments, they both have amino acid sequences of peptides described herein, and in still more preferred embodiments, they have the same amino acid sequence.
It was also a discovery of this invention that concatamers of the class A Amphipathic helix peptides of this invention are also effective in mitigating one or more symptoms of atherosclerosis. The monomers comprising the concatamers can be coupled directly together or joined by a linker. In certain embodiments, the linker is an amino acid linker (e.g. a proline), or a peptide linker (e.g. Gly4Ser3)(SEQ ID NO:106). In certain embodiments, the concatamer is a 2 mer, more preferably a 3 mer, still more preferably a 4 mer, and most preferably 5 mer, 8 mer or 10 mer.
X. Pharmaceutical Formulations.
In order to carry out the methods of the invention, one or more peptides or peptide mimetics of this invention are administered, e.g. to an individual diagnosed as having one or more symptoms of atherosclerosis, or as being at risk for atherosclerosis. The peptides or peptide mimetics can be administered in the “native” form or, if desired, in the form of salts, esters, amides, prodrugs, derivatives, and the like, provided the salt, ester, amide, prodrug or derivative is suitable pharmacologically, i.e., effective in the present method. Salts, esters, amides, prodrugs and other derivatives of the active agents may be prepared using standard procedures known to those skilled in the art of synthetic organic chemistry and described, for example, by March (1992) Advanced Organic Chemistry; Reactions, Mechanisms and Structure, 4th Ed. N.Y. Wiley-Interscience.
For example, acid addition salts are prepared from the free base using conventional methodology, that typically involves reaction with a suitable acid. Generally, the base form of the drug is dissolved in a polar organic solvent such as methanol or ethanol and the acid is added thereto. The resulting salt either precipitates or may be brought out of solution by addition of a less polar solvent. Suitable acids for preparing acid addition salts include both organic acids, e.g., acetic acid, propionic acid, glycolic acid, pyruvic acid, oxalic acid, malic acid, malonic acid, succinic acid, maleic acid, fumaric acid, tartaric acid, citric acid, benzoic acid, cinnamic acid, mandelic acid, methanesulfonic acid, ethanesulfonic acid, p-toluenesulfonic acid, salicylic acid, and the like, as well as inorganic acids, e.g., hydrochloric acid, hydrobromic acid, sulfuric acid, nitric acid, phosphoric acid, and the like. An acid addition salt may be reconverted to the free base by treatment with a suitable base. Particularly preferred acid addition salts of the active agents herein are halide salts, such as may be prepared using hydrochloric or hydrobromic acids. Conversely, preparation of basic salts of the peptides or mimetics are prepared in a similar manner using a pharmaceutically acceptable base such as sodium hydroxide, potassium hydroxide, ammonium hydroxide, calcium hydroxide, trimethylamine, or the like. Particularly preferred basic salts include alkali metal salts, e.g., the sodium salt, and copper salts.
Preparation of esters typically involves functionalization of hydroxyl and/or carboxyl groups which may be present within the molecular structure of the drug. The esters are typically acyl-substituted derivatives of free alcohol groups, i.e., moieties that are derived from carboxylic acids of the formula RCOOH where R is alky, and preferably is lower alkyl. Esters can be reconverted to the free acids, if desired, by using conventional hydrogenolysis or hydrolysis procedures.
Amides and prodrugs may also be prepared using techniques known to those skilled in the art or described in the pertinent literature. For example, amides may be prepared from esters, using suitable amine reactants, or they may be prepared from an anhydride or an acid chloride by reaction with ammonia or a lower alkyl amine. Prodrugs are typically prepared by covalent attachment of a moiety that results in a compound that is therapeutically inactive until modified by an individual's metabolic system.
The peptides or mimetics identified herein are useful for parenteral, topical, oral, nasal (or otherwise inhaled), rectal, or local administration, such as by aerosol or transdermally, for prophylactic and/or therapeutic treatment of atherosclerosis and/or symptoms thereof. The pharmaceutical compositions can be administered in a variety of unit dosage forms depending upon the method of administration. Suitable unit dosage forms, include, but are not limited to powders, tablets, pills, capsules, lozenges, suppositories, patches, nasal sprays, injectibles, implantable sustained-release formulations, lipid complexes, etc.
The peptides and/or peptide mimetics of this invention are typically combined with a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier (excipient) to form a pharmacological composition. Pharmaceutically acceptable carriers can contain one or more physiologically acceptable compound(s) that act, for example, to stabilize the composition or to increase or decrease the absorption of the active agent(s). Physiologically acceptable compounds can include, for example, carbohydrates, such as glucose, sucrose, or dextrans, antioxidants, such as ascorbic acid or glutathione, chelating agents, low molecular weight proteins, protection and uptake enhancers such as lipids, compositions that reduce the clearance or hydrolysis of the active agents, or excipients or other stabilizers and/or buffers.
Other physiologically acceptable compounds include wetting agents, emulsifying agents, dispersing agents or preservatives that are particularly useful for preventing the growth or action of microorganisms. Various preservatives are well known and include, for example, phenol and ascorbic acid. One skilled in the art would appreciate that the choice of pharmaceutically acceptable carrier(s), including a physiologically acceptable compound depends, for example, on the route of administration of the active agent(s) and on the particular physio-chemical characteristics of the active agent(s).
The excipients are preferably sterile and generally free of undesirable matter. These compositions may be sterilized by conventional, well-known sterilization techniques.
In therapeutic applications, the compositions of this invention are administered to a patient suffering from one or more symptoms of atherosclerosis or at risk for atherosclerosis in an amount sufficient to cure or at least partially prevent or arrest the disease and/or its complications. An amount adequate to accomplish this is defined as a “therapeutically effective dose.” Amounts effective for this use will depend upon the severity of the disease and the general state of the patient's health. Single or multiple administrations of the compositions may be administered depending on the dosage and frequency as required and tolerated by the patient. In any event, the composition should provide a sufficient quantity of the active agents of the formulations of this invention to effectively treat (ameliorate one or more symptoms) the patient.
The concentration of peptide or mimetic can vary widely, and will be selected primarily based on fluid volumes, viscosities, body weight and the like in accordance with the particular mode of administration selected and the patient's needs. Concentrations, however, will typically be selected to provide dosages ranging from about 0.1 or 1 mg/kg/day to about 50 mg/kg/day and sometimes higher. Typical dosages range from about 3 mg/kg/day to about 3.5 mg/kg/day, preferably from about 3.5 mg/kg/day to about 7.2 mg/kg/day, more preferably from about 7.2 mg/kg/day to about 11.0 mg/kg/day, and most preferably from about 11.0 mg/kg/day to about 15.0 mg/kg/day. In certain preferred embodiments, dosages range from about 10 mg/kg/day to about 50 mg/kg/day. It will be appreciated that such dosages may be varied to optimize a therapeutic regimen in a particular subject or group of subjects.
In certain preferred embodiments, the peptides or peptide mimetics of this invention are administered orally (e.g. via a tablet) or as an injectable in accordance with standard methods well known to those of skill in the art. In other preferred embodiments, the peptides, may also be delivered through the skin using conventional transdermal drug delivery systems, i.e., transdermal “patches” wherein the active agent(s) are typically contained within a laminated structure that serves as a drug delivery device to be affixed to the skin. In such a structure, the drug composition is typically contained in a layer, or “reservoir,” underlying an upper backing layer. It will be appreciated that the term “reservoir” in this context refers to a quantity of “active ingredient(s)” that is ultimately available for delivery to the surface of the skin. Thus, for example, the “reservoir” may include the active ingredient(s) in an adhesive on a backing layer of the patch, or in any of a variety of different matrix formulations known to those of skill in the art. The patch may contain a single reservoir, or it may contain multiple reservoirs.
In one embodiment, the reservoir comprises a polymeric matrix of a pharmaceutically acceptable contact adhesive material that serves to affix the system to the skin during drug delivery. Examples of suitable skin contact adhesive materials include, but are not limited to, polyethylenes, polysiloxanes, polyisobutylenes, polyacrylates, polyurethanes, and the like. Alternatively, the drug-containing reservoir and skin contact adhesive are present as separate and distinct layers, with the adhesive underlying the reservoir which, in this case, may be either a polymeric matrix as described above, or it may be a liquid or hydrogel reservoir, or may take some other form. The backing layer in these laminates, which serves as the upper surface of the device, preferably functions as a primary structural element of the “patch” and provides the device with much of its flexibility. The material selected for the backing layer is preferably substantially impermeable to the active agent(s) and any other materials that are present.
Other preferred formulations for topical drug delivery include, but are not limited to, ointments and creams. Ointments are semisolid preparations which are typically based on petrolatum or other petroleum derivatives. Creams containing the selected active agent, are typically viscous liquid or semisolid emulsions, often either oil-in-water or water-in-oil. Cream bases are typically water-washable, and contain an oil phase, an emulsifier and an aqueous phase. The oil phase, also sometimes called the “internal” phase, is generally comprised of petrolatum and a fatty alcohol such as cetyl or stearyl alcohol; the aqueous phase usually, although not necessarily, exceeds the oil phase in volume, and generally contains a humectant. The emulsifier in a cream formulation is generally a nonionic, anionic, cationic or amphoteric surfactant. The specific ointment or cream base to be used, as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, is one that will provide for optimum drug delivery. As with other carriers or vehicles, an ointment base should be inert, stable, nonirritating and nonsensitizing.
Unlike typical peptide formulations, the peptides of this invention comprising D-form amino acids can be administered, even orally, without protection against proteolysis by stomach acid, etc. Nevertheless, in certain embodiments, peptide delivery can be enhanced by the use of protective excipients. This is typically accomplished either by complexing the polypeptide with a composition to render it resistant to acidic and enzymatic hydrolysis or by packaging the polypeptide in an appropriately resistant carrier such as a liposome. Means of protecting polypeptides for oral delivery are well known in the art (see, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 5,391,377 describing lipid compositions for oral delivery of therapeutic agents).
Sustained Release Formulations.
Elevated serum half-life can be maintained by the use of sustained-release protein “packaging” systems. Such sustained release systems are well known to those of skill in the art. In one preferred embodiment, the ProLease biodegradable microsphere delivery system for proteins and peptides (Tracy (1998) Biotechnol. Prog. 14: 108; Johnson et al. (1996), Nature Med. 2: 795; Herbert et al. (1998), Pharmaceut. Res. 15, 357) a dry powder composed of biodegradable polymeric microspheres containing the protein in a polymer matrix that can be compounded as a dry formulation with or without other agents.
The ProLease microsphere fabrication process was specifically designed to achieve a high protein encapsulation efficiency while maintaining protein integrity. The process consists of (i) preparation of freeze-dried protein particles from bulk protein by spray freeze-drying the drug solution with stabilizing excipients, (ii) preparation of a drug-polymer suspension followed by sonication or homogenization to reduce the drug particle size, (iii) production of frozen drug-polymer microspheres by atomization into liquid nitrogen, (iv) extraction of the polymer solvent with ethanol, and (v) filtration and vacuum drying to produce the final dry-powder product. The resulting powder contains the solid form of the protein, which is homogeneously and rigidly dispersed within porous polymer particles. The polymer most commonly used in the process, poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLG), is both biocompatible and biodegradable.
Encapsulation can be achieved at low temperatures (e.g., −40° C.). During encapsulation, the protein is maintained in the solid state in the absence of water, thus minimizing water-induced conformational mobility of the protein, preventing protein degradation reactions that include water as a reactant, and avoiding organic-aqueous interfaces where proteins may undergo denaturation. A preferred process uses solvents in which most proteins are insoluble, thus yielding high encapsulation efficiencies (e.g., greater than 95%).
In another embodiment, one or more components of the solution can be provided as a “concentrate”, e.g., in a storage container (e.g., in a premeasured volume) ready for dilution, or in a soluble capsule ready for addition to a volume of water.
In certain instances, one or more peptides of this invention are administered in conjunction with one or more active agents (e.g. statins, beta blockers, ACE inhibitors, lipids, etc.). The two agents (e.g. peptide and statin) can be administered simultaneously or sequentially. When administered sequentially the two agents are administered so that both achieve a physiologically relevant concentration over a similar time period (e.g. so that both agents are active at some common time).
In certain embodiments, both agents are administered simultaneously. In such instances it can be convenient to provide both agents in a single combined formulation. This can be achieved by a variety of methods well known to those of skill in the art. For example, in a table formulation the table can comprise two layers one layer comprising, e.g. the statin(s), and the other layer comprising e.g. the peptide(s). In a time release capsule, the capsule can comprise two time release bead sets, one for the peptide(s) and one containing the statin(s).
The foregoing formulations and administration methods are intended to be illustrative and not limiting. It will be appreciated that, using the teaching provided herein, other suitable formulations and modes of administration can be readily devised.
XI. Additional Pharmacologically Active Agents.
Additional pharmacologically active agents may be delivered along with the primary active agents, e.g., the peptides of this invention. In one embodiment, such agents include, but are not limited to agents that reduce the risk of atherosclerotic events and/or complications thereof. Such agents include, but are not limited to beta blockers, beta blockers and thiazide diuretic combinations, statins, aspirin, ace inhibitors, ace receptor inhibitors (ARBs), and the like.
It was a surprising discovery that administration of one or more peptides of this invention “concurrently” with one or more statins synergistically enhances the effect of the statin(s). That is, the statins can achieve a similar efficacy at lower dosage thereby obviating potential adverse side effects (e.g. muscle wasting) associated with these drugs and/or cause the statins to be significantly more anti-inflammatory at any given dose.
The major effect of the statins is to lower ILDL-cholesterol levels, and they lower LDL-cholesterol more than many other types of drugs. Statins generally inhibit an enzyme, HMG-CoA reductase, that controls the rate of cholesterol production in the body. These drugs typically lower cholesterol by slowing down the production of cholesterol and by increasing the liver's ability to remove the LDL-cholesterol already in the blood.
The large reductions in total and LDL-cholesterol produced by these drugs appears to result in large reductions in heart attacks and heart disease deaths. Thanks to their track record in these studies and their ability to lower LDL-cholesterol, statins have become the drugs most often prescribed when a person needs a cholesterol-lowering medicine. Studies using statins have reported 20 to 60 percent lower LDL-cholesterol levels in patients on these drugs. Statins also reduce elevated triglyceride levels and produce a modest increase in HDL-cholesterol. Recently it has been appreciated that statins have anti-inflammatory properties that may not be directly related to the degree of lipid lowering achieved. For example it has been found that statins decrease the plasma levels of the inflammatory marker CRP relatively independent of changes in plasma lipid levels. This anti-inflammatory activity of statins has been found to be as or more important in predicting the reduction in clinical events induced by statins than is the degree of LDL lowering.
The statins are usually given in a single dose at the evening meal or at bedtime. These medications are often given in the evening to take advantage of the fact that the body makes more cholesterol at night than during the day. When combined with the peptides described herein, the combined peptide/statin treatment regimen will also typically be given in the evening.
Suitable statins are well known to those of skill in the art. Such statins include, but are not limited to atorvastatin (Lipitor®, Pfizer), simvastatin (Zocor®, Merck0, pravastatin (Pravachol®, Bristol-Myers Squibb0, fluvastatin (Lescol®, Novartis), lovastatin (Mevacor®, Merck), rosuvastatin (Crestor®, Astra Zeneca), and Pitavastatin (Sankyo), and the like.
The combined statin/peptide dosage can be routinely optimized for each patient. Typically statins show results after several weeks, with a maximum effect in 4 to 6 weeks. Prior to combined treatment with a statin and one of the peptides described herein, the physician would obtain routine tests for starting a statin including LDL-cholesterol and HDL-cholesterol levels. Additionally, the physician would also measure the anti-inflammatory properties of the patient's HDL and determine CRP levels with a high sensitivity assay. After about 4 to 6 weeks of combined treatment, the physician would typically repeat these tests and adjust the dosage of the medications to achieve maximum lipid lowering and maximum anti-inflammatory activity.
Suitable beta blockers include, but are not limited to cardioselective (selective beta 1 blockers), e.g., acebutolol (Sectral™), atenolol (Tenormin™), betaxolol (Kerlone™), bisoprolol (Zebeta™), metoprolol (Lopressor™), and the like. Suitable non-selective blockers (block beta 1 and beta 2 equally) include, but are not limited to carteolol (Cartrol™), nadolol (Corgard™), penbutolol (Levatol™), pindolol (Visken™), propranolol (Inderal™), timolol (Blockadren™), labetalol (Normodyne™, Trandate™), and the like.
Suitable beta blocker thiazide diuretic combinations include, but are not limited to Lopressor HCT, ZIAC, Tenoretic, Corzide, Timolide, Inderal LA 40/25, Inderide, Normozide, and the like.
Suitable ace inhibitors include, but are not limited to captopril (e.g. Capoten™ by Squibb), benazepril (e.g., Lotensin™ by Novartis), enalapril (e.g., Vasotec™ by Merck), fosinopril (e.g., Monopril™ by Bristol-Myers), lisinopril (e.g. Prinivil™ by Merck or Zestril™ by Astra-Zeneca), quinapril (e.g. Accupril™ by Parke-Davis), ramipril (e.g., Altace™ by Hoechst Marion Roussel, King Pharmaceuticals), imidapril, perindopril erbumine (e.g., Aceonr™ by Rhone-Polenc Rorer), trandolapril (e.g., Mavik™ by Knoll Pharmaceutical), and the like. Suitable ARBS (Ace Receptor Blockers) include but are not limited to losartan (e.g. Cozaar™ by Merck), irbesartan (e.g., Avapro™ by Sanofi), candesartan (e.g., Atacand™ by Astra Merck), valsartan (e.g., Diovan™ by Novartis), and the like.
In certain embodiments, the peptides of this invention are administered in conjunction with one or more lipids. The lipids can be formulated as an active agent, and/or as an excipient to protect and/or enhance transport/uptake of the peptides or they can be administered separately.
Without being bound by a particular theory, it was discovered of this invention that administration (e.g. oral administration) of certain phospholipids can significantly increase HDL/LDL ratios. In addition, it is believed that certain medium-length phospholipids are transported by a process different than that involved in general lipid transport. Thus, co-administration of certain medium-length phospholipids with the peptides of this invention confer a number of advantages: They protect the phospholipids from digestion or hydrolysis, they improve peptide uptake, and they improve HDL/LDL ratios.
The lipids can be formed into liposomes that encapsulate the polypeptides of this invention and/or they can be simply complexed/admixed with the polypeptides. Methods of making liposomes and encapsulating reagents are well known to those of skill in the art (see, e.g., Martin and Papahadjopoulos (1982) J. Biol. Chem., 257: 286-288; Papahadjopoulos et al. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 88: 11460-11464; Huang et al. (1992) Cancer Res., 52:6774-6781; Lasic et al. (1992) FEBS Lett., 312: 255-258., and the like).
Preferred phospholipids for use in these methods have fatty acids ranging from about 4 carbons to about 24 carbons in the sn-1 and sn-2 positions. In certain preferred embodiments, the fatty acids are saturated. In other preferred embodiments, the fatty acids can be unsaturated. Various preferred fatty acids are illustrated in Table 2.
TABLE 2 Preferred fatty acids in the sn-1 and/or sn-2 position of the preferred phospholipids for administration of D polypeptides. Carbon No. Common Name IUPAC Name 3:0 Propionoyl Trianoic 4:0 Butanoyl Tetranoic 5:0 Pentanoyl Pentanoic 6:0 Caproyl Hexanoic 7:0 Heptanoyl Heptanoic 8:0 Capryloyl Octanoic 9:0 Nonanoyl Nonanoic 10:0 Capryl Decanoic 11:0 Undcanoyl Undecanoic 12:0 Lauroyl Dodecanoic 13:0 Tridecanoyl Tridecanoic 14:0 Myristoyl Tetradecanoic 15:0 Pentadecanoyl Pentadecanoic 16:0 Palmitoyl Hexadecanoic 17:0 Heptadecanoyl Heptadecanoic 18:0 Stearoyl Octadecanoic 19:0 Nonadecanoyl Nonadecanoic 20:0 Arachidoyl Eicosanoic 21:0 Heniecosanoyl Heniecosanoic 22:0 Behenoyl Docosanoic 23:0 Trucisanoyl Trocosanoic 24:0 Lignoceroyl Tetracosanoic 14:1 Myristoleoyl (9-cis) 14:1 Myristelaidoyl (9-trans) 16:1 Palmitoleoyl (9-cis) 16:1 Palmitelaidoyl (9-trans)
The fatty acids in these positions can be the same or different. Particularly preferred phospholipids have phosphorylcholine at the sn-3 position.
In another embodiment this invention provides kits for amelioration of one or more symptoms of atherosclerosis and/or for the prophylactic treatment of a subject (human or animal) at risk for atherosclerosis and/or for stimulating the formation and cycling of pre-beta high density lipoprotein-like particles and/or for inhibiting one or more symptoms of osteoporosis. The kits preferably comprise a container containing one or more of the peptides or peptide mimetics of this invention. The peptide or peptide mimetic can be provided in a unit dosage formulation (e.g. suppository, tablet, caplet, patch, etc.) and/or may be optionally combined with one or more pharmaceutically acceptable excipients.
The kit can, optionally, further comprise one or more other agents used in the treatment of heart disease and/or atherosclerosis. Such agents include, but are not limited to, beta blockers, vasodilators, aspirin, statins, ace inhibitors or ace receptor inhibitors (ARBs) and the like, e.g. as described above.
In certain preferred embodiments, the kits additionally include a statin (e.g. cerivastatin, atorvastatin, simvastatin, pravastatin, fluvastatin, lovastatin. rosuvastatin, pitavastatin, etc.) either formulated separately or in a combined formulation with the peptide(s). Typically the dosage of a statin in such a formulation can be lower than the dosage of a statin typically presecribed without the synergistic peptide.
In addition, the kits optionally include labeling and/or instructional materials providing directions (i.e., protocols) for the practice of the methods or use of the “therapeutics” or “prophylactics” of this invention. Preferred instructional materials describe the use of one or more polypeptides of this invention to mitigate one or more symptoms of atherosclerosis and/or to prevent the onset or increase of one or more of such symptoms in an individual at risk for atherosclerosis and/or to stimulate the formation and cycling of pre-beta high density lipoprotein-like particles and/or to inhibit one or more symptoms of osteoporosis. The instructional materials may also, optionally, teach preferred dosages/therapeutic regiment, counter indications and the like.
While the instructional materials typically comprise written or printed materials they are not limited to such. Any medium capable of storing such instructions and communicating them to an end user is contemplated by this invention. Such media include, but are not limited to electronic storage media (e.g., magnetic discs, tapes, cartridges, chips), optical media (e.g., CD ROM), and the like. Such media may include addresses to internet sites that provide such instructional materials.
The following examples are offered to illustrate, but not to limit the claimed invention.
The serum concentration of D-4F after oral administration was compared to that obtained by injection.
Based on the low absorption, one might think that D-4F would not be biologically active. Normal mouse plasma contains on the order of 100 mg/dl or 1 mg/ml of apoAI. Since apoE null mice have low HDL-cholesterol levels, if we assume that their apoA-I levels are only one-fifth normal, they would have about. 0.20 mg/ml of apoA-I. If we instilled 500 μg of D-4F into the stomach of a mouse and only 1% was absorbed, we would have added 5 μg of D-4F to approximately 1.5 ml of mouse plasma so we would have approximately 3.3 μg of D-4F per ml of mouse plasma. So how could 3.3 μg of D-4F per ml of mouse plasma influence lipid transport when apoE null mouse plasma already contains approximately 200 μg of apoA-I.
In other studies, 10 minutes after instilling either saline or 500 μg [14C]-D-4F into the stomachs of apoE null mice there was no detectable D-4F in plasma. However, 20 minutes after D-4F was given, it was detected in plasma. When the plasma was fractionated by FPLC the HDL peak eluted in fraction 30 and the D-4F eluted in FPLC fractions 35 to 37 (labeled CCP in
By LC-MRM, 20 min after giving D-4F orally, fractions 35-37 were also seen to contain D-4F (
The bottom panel of
As indicated in
We conclude from these data that 20 min after absorption from the intestine D-4F forms small pre-beta HDL-like particles that contain relatively high amounts of apoA-I and paraoxonase. Indeed, estimating the amount of apoA-I in these pre-beta HDL-like particles from Western blots and comparing the amount of apoA-I to the amount of D-4F in these particles (determined by radioactivity or LC-MRM) suggests that as D-4F is absorbed from the intestine, it acts as a catalyst causing the formation of these pre-beta HDL-like particles. This small amount of intestinally derived D-4F somehow recruits amounts of apoA-I, paraoxonase, and cholesterol into these particles that are orders of magnitude more than the amount of D-4F.
Based on the content of apoA-I, D-4F and paraoxonase in the pre-beta HDL-like particles (CCP) generated 20 min after D-4F (
To follow the course of these particles over time we labeled D-4F with a novel fluorescent probe as shown in
Following absorption, D-4F rapidly recruits relatively large amounts of apoA-I and paraoxonase to form pre-beta HDL-like particles which are very likely the most potent particles for both promoting reverse cholesterol transport and for destroying biologically active oxidized lipids. We believe that the formation of these particles and their subsequent rapid incorporation into mature HDL likely explains the dramatic reduction in atherosclerosis that we observed in LDL receptor null mice on a Western diet and in apoE null mice on a chow diet independent of changes in plasma cholesterol or HDL-cholesterol. Based on these data, we believe the administration of peptides of this invention can promote lipid transport and “detoxification” by stimulating the formation and cycling of pre-beta high density lipoprotein-like particles.
ApoE null female mice three months old on a chow diet were given drinking water alone (Water), or drinking water containing 1 μg/ml of D-4F, or 0.05 mg/ml of Atorvastatin, or 0.05 mg/ml of Pravastatin, or 1 μg/ml of D-4F together with 0.05 mg/ml of Atorvastatin, or 1 μg/ml of D-4F together with 0.05 mg/ml of Pravastatin. After 24 hours the mice were bled and their HDL was tested in a human artery wall coculture model. Twenty μg of 1-palmitoyl-2-arachidonyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphorylcholine (PAPC) was added together with 1 μg/ml of hydroperoxyeicosatetraenoic acid (HPODE) to cocultures of human artery wall cells as described previously (Navab et al. (2001) J Lipid Res. 42: 1308-1317). Human HDL (h, HDL) was added at 350 μg/ml cholesterol or no addition was made to the cocultures (No Addition), or mouse HDL isolated by FPLC from the mice given drinking water alone (Water) or the additions shown on the X-axis were added to the cocultures at 50 μg/ml HDL-cholesterol. After 8 hours of incubation, supernatants were collected and assayed for monocyte chemotactic activity using standard neuroprobe chambers.
The results are shown in
Thus, doses of D-4F alone, or statins alone, which by themselves had no effect on HDL function when given together acted synergistically. When D-4F and a statin were given together to apo E null mice, their pro-inflammatory HDL at 50 μg/ml of HDL-cholesterol became as effective as normal human HDL at 350 μg/ml of HDL-cholesterol in preventing the inflammatory response induced by the action of HPODE oxidizing PAPC in cocultures of human artery wall cells.
D-4F (Ac-D-W-F-K-A-F-Y-D-K-V-A-E-K-F-K-E-A-F-NH2, SEQ ID NO: 5) at 1 mg/ml was or was not added to the drinking water of apoE null mice (8 mice per group). After 6 weeks mice were euthanized and the left femur from each mouse removed and analyzed by quantitative CT scanning to determine BMD. Scans were performed at 4 longitudinal axis positions (slices) for each femur, with 1 being most distal and 4 most proximal. Values of BMD are expressed as mean±SEM.
It was found that adding D-4F to the drinking water of apoE null mice for 6 weeks dramatically increased trabecular bone mineral density (Table 3).
Effect of D-4F on bone mineral density (BMD) in mice.
Trabecular Bone Mineral Density
3.1 ± 3
18 ± 4
1.9 ± 2
12 ± 6
1.7 ± 1
11 ± 6
7.3 ± 4
16 ± 6
It is interesting that bisphosphonates are particularly active on trabecular bone (Bohic et al. (2000) Bone, 26: 341-348; Ramamurthy et al. (2001) Curr Med Chem., 8: 295-303; Rohanizadeh et al. (2000) Calcif Tissue Int., 67: 330-336; Rodan (1997) Bone 20: 1-4). Since it was determined that D-4F did not alter the lipid profile in these mice, it is likely that the beneficial effects of the peptide are due to interference with the inhibitory actions of oxidized lipids on bone. Our data cannot differentiate between an action on osteoblasts or osteoclasts but these preliminary data strongly suggest that D-4F may be an excellent agent to inhibit/prevent/treat osteoporosis.
While the peptides of this invention, when synthesized from D-amino acids, were more effective when given orally than peptides comprising all L-amino acids (“L-form peptides”), the L-form peptides were also effective. This is amply illustrated in the examples provided in the priority documents of the present application (e.g. U.S. Ser. Nos. 09/645,454, 09/896,841, 10/187,215, and 10/273,386) all of which are incorporated herein by reference. For example in Example 1 on pages 46 to 57 of U.S. Ser. No. 10/187,215 (the '215 application), the specification of which is published in PCT/US01/26497 (WO 02/15923), evidence was presented that the peptide known as 5F synthesized from L-amino acids (Sequence ID No 6 in Table 1 page 27) when given by injection was cleared from the circulation of the mouse with a T1/2 of 6.22 hours (see Table 3 on page 51), was not toxic (see page 52 and Table 4 on page 52 of the '215 application), was not antigenic (see top of page 53), and dramatically improved the ability of the mouse HDL to inhibit the oxidation of LDL and prevent LDL-induced monocyte chemotactic activity in human artery wall cell cocultures (see page 54 and FIG. 7). Additionally as shown at the bottom of page 54 and in FIG. 8 of of the '215 application, the injection of the 5F peptide dramatically reduced atherosclerotic lesions in the mice.
In Example 3 of the '215 application at the bottom of page 73 and in FIG. 18 we demonstrated that incubation of 4F, 5F and 6F, all synthesized from L-amino acids dramatically reduced LDL-induced monocyte chemotactic activity in a human artery wall coculture.
In Example 5 of the '215 application, as indicated at the bottom of page 78 and in FIG. 22A, the peptide, 4F, when given by mouth to mice was more degraded when it was synthesized from L-amino acids than was the case when the peptide was synthesized from D-amino acids. However as shown in FIG. 22A some intact peptide was found in the circulation after oral administration of L-4F. Furthermore, as shown in FIG. 22B the mouse HDL was improved after oral administration of L-4F in terms of its ability to inhibit monocyte chemotactic activity when human artery wall cells were exposed to human LDL, although the improvement in HDL's anti-inflammatory properties were not as dramatic as when the peptide was synthesized from all D-amino acids.
In summary, the examples detailed in the priority documents of this application and incorporated herein by reference demonstrate that administration of the peptides of this invention were effective whether synthesized from L or D-amino acids, although the D-form peptides were more effective when given orally.
It is understood that the examples and embodiments described herein are for illustrative purposes only and that various modifications or changes in light thereof will be suggested to persons skilled in the art and are to be included within the spirit and purview of this application and scope of the appended claims. All publications, patents, and patent applications cited herein are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety for all purposes.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3767040||Nov 20, 1972||Oct 23, 1973||Minnesota Mining & Mfg||Pressure-sensitive polyurethane adhesives|
|US4155913||Oct 14, 1977||May 22, 1979||Hoffmann-La Roche Inc.||Thienotriazolodiazepine derivatives|
|US4643988||May 15, 1984||Feb 17, 1987||Research Corporation||Amphipathic peptides|
|US4684520||Apr 2, 1985||Aug 4, 1987||Seuref A.G.||Pharmaceutical compositions having cerebral antianoxic and metabolic activities|
|US5298490||Jan 9, 1990||Mar 29, 1994||Immunobiology Research Institute, Inc.||Tetra and penta-peptides useful in regulating the immune system|
|US5304470||Jan 23, 1992||Apr 19, 1994||Forschungszentrum Juelich Gmbh||Process for the enzymatic preparation of protected and unprotected di- and oligopeptides in aqueous solutions|
|US5344822||Aug 12, 1992||Sep 6, 1994||The Rogosin Institute||Methods useful in endotoxin prophylaxis and therapy|
|US5358934||Dec 11, 1992||Oct 25, 1994||The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of Agriculture||Materials and methods for control of pests|
|US5480869||Jul 23, 1993||Jan 2, 1996||The Regents Of The University Of California||Anti-inflammatory peptide analogs and treatment to inhibit vascular leakage in injured tissues|
|US5595973||Sep 12, 1994||Jan 21, 1997||Biomeasure Incorporated||Protection of hemopoietic cells during chemotherapy or radiotherapy|
|US5721138||May 15, 1995||Feb 24, 1998||Sandford University||Apolipoprotein(A) promoter and regulatory sequence constructs and methods of use|
|US5733549||Aug 12, 1993||Mar 31, 1998||Shino-Test Corporation||Peptides including amino acid sequences selected from lipoprotein (a) and apolipoprotein (a), antibodies recognizing these amino acid sequences, and methods of determination using these antibodies|
|US5733879||Jun 8, 1993||Mar 31, 1998||N.V. Innogenetics, S.A.||Peptides and proteins, process for their preparation and their use as cholesterol acceptors|
|US5814467||Aug 19, 1994||Sep 29, 1998||The Scripps Research Institute||APO AI polypeptides, diagnostic methods and systems for quantifying APO AI, and therapeutic methods|
|US5854238||Aug 30, 1996||Dec 29, 1998||Hoffmann-La Roche Inc.||Use of a thienotriazolodiazephine to increase apolipoprotein A-I levels|
|US6004925||Sep 29, 1997||Dec 21, 1999||J. L. Dasseux||Apolipoprotein A-I agonists and their use to treat dyslipidemic disorders|
|US6037323||Sep 29, 1997||Mar 14, 2000||Jean-Louis Dasseux||Apolipoprotein A-I agonists and their use to treat dyslipidemic disorders|
|US6046166||Sep 29, 1997||Apr 4, 2000||Jean-Louis Dasseux||Apolipoprotein A-I agonists and their use to treat dyslipidemic disorders|
|US6086918||Mar 14, 1997||Jul 11, 2000||Unigene Laboratories, Inc.||Oral peptide pharmaceutical products|
|US6172071||Jul 30, 1998||Jan 9, 2001||Hughes Institute||Lipid-lowering quinazoline derivative|
|US6228989||Nov 13, 1998||May 8, 2001||The Regents Of The University Of California||Peptide substrates phosphorylated by P21-activated protein kinase|
|US6265377||Dec 17, 1999||Jul 24, 2001||Jean-Louis Dasseux||Apolipoprotein A-I agonists and their use to treat dyslipidemic disorders|
|US6265382||Apr 2, 1998||Jul 24, 2001||Warner-Lambert Company||Dipeptide inhibitors of protein farnesyltransferase|
|US6287590||Oct 2, 1997||Sep 11, 2001||Esperion Therapeutics, Inc.||Peptide/lipid complex formation by co-lyophilization|
|US6297216||May 12, 1995||Oct 2, 2001||Solvo Biotechnology||Compounds for reversing drug resistance|
|US6303619||Mar 12, 1998||Oct 16, 2001||University Of Virginia||Meta-substituted acidic 8-phenylxanthine antagonists of A3 human adenosine receptors|
|US6329341||Dec 1, 1999||Dec 11, 2001||Esperion Therapeutics, Inc.||Method of treating septic shock|
|US6376464||Dec 1, 1999||Apr 23, 2002||Esperion Therapeutics, Inc.||Lipid complexes of APO A-1 agonist compounds|
|US6383808||Sep 11, 2000||May 7, 2002||Isis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.||Antisense inhibition of clusterin expression|
|US6444230||Nov 20, 2000||Sep 3, 2002||Chemoxal Sa||Synergistic composition of peracetic acid and amine oxide|
|US6444681||Jun 9, 2000||Sep 3, 2002||The Ohio State University Research Foundation||Methods and compositions for treating Raynaud's Phenomenon and scleroderma|
|US6455088||Aug 21, 2000||Sep 24, 2002||Jean-Louis Dasseux||Peptide/lipid complex formation by co-lyophilization|
|US6464975||Dec 10, 1999||Oct 15, 2002||The Research Foundation Of State University Of New York||Compositions and methods for altering cell migration|
|US6498038||Jan 13, 2000||Dec 24, 2002||Bioprobes, Inc.||Loss of sialic acid from apolipoprotein j as an indicator of alcohol intake and/or alcohol related liver damage|
|US6518412||Sep 29, 1997||Feb 11, 2003||Jean-Louis Dasseux||Gene therapy approaches to supply apolipoprotein A-I agonists and their use to treat dyslipidemic disorders|
|US6525083||Jul 25, 2001||Feb 25, 2003||Merck & Co., Inc.||N-substituted indoles useful in the treatment of diabetes|
|US6555651||Oct 9, 1997||Apr 29, 2003||The Trustees Of Columbia University In The City Of New York||Ligand binding site of rage and uses thereof|
|US6573239||Dec 1, 1999||Jun 3, 2003||Jean-Louis Dasseux||Apolipoprotein A-I agonist compounds|
|US6602854||Dec 1, 1999||Aug 5, 2003||Jean-Louis Dasseux||Branched multimeric Apo A-I agonist compounds|
|US6630450||Dec 1, 1999||Oct 7, 2003||Jean-Louis Dasseux||Method of treating dyslipidemia|
|US6635623||May 14, 1998||Oct 21, 2003||Baylor College Of Medicine||Lipoproteins as nucleic acid vectors|
|US6642239||Feb 7, 2001||Nov 4, 2003||Novartis Ag||Dipeptide nitrile cathepsin K inhibitors|
|US6664230||Aug 24, 2000||Dec 16, 2003||The Regents Of The University Of California||Orally administered peptides to ameliorate atherosclerosis|
|US6696545||Feb 23, 1998||Feb 24, 2004||Sangstat Medical Corporation||Cytomodulating lipophilic peptides for modulating immune system activity and inhibiting inflammation|
|US6716816||Dec 1, 1999||Apr 6, 2004||Jean-Louis Dasseux||Multimeric Apo A-I agonist compounds|
|US6717031||Sep 8, 1998||Apr 6, 2004||Kate Dora Games||Method for selecting a transgenic mouse model of alzheimer's disease|
|US6727063||Sep 7, 2000||Apr 27, 2004||Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.||Single nucleotide polymorphisms in genes|
|US6734169||May 25, 2001||May 11, 2004||Jean Louis Dasseux||Apolipoprotein A-I agonists and their use to treat dyslipidemic disorders|
|US6753313||Dec 1, 1999||Jun 22, 2004||Jean-Louis Dasseux||Multimeric Apoa-I agonist compounds|
|US6815426||Feb 12, 2002||Nov 9, 2004||E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company||Angiogenesis-inhibitory tripeptides, compositions and their methods of use|
|US6846636||May 13, 1999||Jan 25, 2005||American National Red Cross||Methods and compositions for HDL holoparticle uptake receptor|
|US6849636||Dec 18, 2003||Feb 1, 2005||Merck & Co., Inc.||Triazole derivatives as inhibitors of 11-beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase-1|
|US6849714||May 17, 2000||Feb 1, 2005||Conjuchem, Inc.||Protection of endogenous therapeutic peptides from peptidase activity through conjugation to blood components|
|US6869568||Jun 5, 2003||Mar 22, 2005||The Regents Of The University Of California||Functional assay of high-density lipoprotein|
|US6887470||Sep 7, 2000||May 3, 2005||Conjuchem, Inc.||Protection of endogenous therapeutic peptides from peptidase activity through conjugation to blood components|
|US6933279||Jun 29, 2001||Aug 23, 2005||The Regents Of The University Of California||Orally administered peptides to ameliorate atherosclerosis|
|US6936691||Apr 11, 2001||Aug 30, 2005||Human Genome Sciences, Inc.||Secreted protein HCE3C63|
|US6936961||May 13, 2003||Aug 30, 2005||Eastman Kodak Company||Cascaded organic electroluminescent device having connecting units with N-type and P-type organic layers|
|US6982348||Jan 25, 2002||Jan 3, 2006||Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited||Aminoethanol derivatives|
|US7144862||Jun 28, 2002||Dec 5, 2006||The Regents Of The University Of California||Orally administered peptides to ameliorate atherosclerosis|
|US7148197||Aug 26, 2003||Dec 12, 2006||The Regents Of The University Of California||Orally administered small peptides synergize statin activity|
|US7166578||Oct 16, 2002||Jan 23, 2007||The Regents Of The University Of California||Orally administered peptides synergize statin activity|
|US7166625||Dec 31, 2001||Jan 23, 2007||Alteon, Inc.||Method for treating fibrotic diseases and other indications|
|US7199102||Apr 25, 2003||Apr 3, 2007||The Regents Of The University Of California||Orally administered peptides synergize statin activity|
|US7291590||Jun 10, 2004||Nov 6, 2007||Queen's University At Kingston||Compositions and methods for treating atherosclerosis|
|US20010005714||Sep 28, 1998||Jun 28, 2001||Dario Boffelli||Amphipathic molecules as cholesterol and other lipid uptake inhibitors|
|US20020042441||Jul 25, 2001||Apr 11, 2002||Acton John J.||N-substituted indoles useful in the treatment of diabetes|
|US20030027769||Feb 12, 2002||Feb 6, 2003||Scialdone Mark A.||Angiogenesis-inhibitory tripeptides, compositions and their methods of use|
|US20030040505||Nov 26, 2001||Feb 27, 2003||The Regents Of The University Of California||Synthetic phospholipids to ameliorate atherosclerosis and other inflammatory conditions|
|US20030045460||Jun 29, 2001||Mar 6, 2003||Fogelman Alan M.||Orally administered peptides to ameliorate atherosclerosis|
|US20030077641||Sep 23, 2002||Apr 24, 2003||Laskowitz Daniel T.||Methods of suppressing microglial activation and systemic inflammatory responses|
|US20030096737||Apr 19, 2002||May 22, 2003||Anita Diu-Hercend||Caspase inhibitors and uses thereof|
|US20030125260||Oct 31, 2001||Jul 3, 2003||Fortuna Haviv||Tetra-and pentapeptides having antiangiogenic activity|
|US20040059110||Aug 4, 2003||Mar 25, 2004||Ajinomoto Co., Inc.||Novel cystine derivative and agent for suppressing activation of inflammatory factors|
|US20040136989||Jul 18, 2003||Jul 15, 2004||Abbott Laboratories S.A.||Treatment of vasculitides using TNFalpha inhibitors|
|US20040152623||Dec 4, 2003||Aug 5, 2004||Atul Varadhachary||Lactoferrin in the reduction of circulating cholesterol, vascular inflammation, atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease|
|US20040266663||Mar 5, 2004||Dec 30, 2004||Schwartz Daniel M.||Methods to increase reverse cholesterol transport in the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) and bruch's membrane (BM)|
|US20040266671||Apr 25, 2003||Dec 30, 2004||The Regents Of The University Of California||Orally administered peptides synergize statin activity|
|US20050070996||Oct 1, 2003||Mar 31, 2005||Dinh Thomas Q.||Drug-eluting stent for controlled drug delivery|
|US20050154046||Jan 12, 2004||Jul 14, 2005||Longgui Wang||Methods of treating an inflammatory-related disease|
|US20050164950||Aug 6, 2004||Jul 28, 2005||The Regents Of The University Of California||Orally administered small peptides synergize statin activity|
|US20050197381||Apr 13, 2005||Sep 8, 2005||Longgui Wang||Methods of treating an inflammatory-related disease|
|US20050239136||Dec 6, 2004||Oct 27, 2005||Hazen Stanley L||Risk markers for cardiovacular disease|
|US20060069030||Jul 15, 2005||Mar 30, 2006||Trustees Of Tufts College||Apolipoprotein A1 mimetics and uses thereof|
|US20060205634||Apr 10, 2006||Sep 14, 2006||Atul Varadhachary||Lactoferrin in the reduction of circulating cholesterol, vascular inflammation, atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease|
|US20060217298||Feb 4, 2004||Sep 28, 2006||Srivastava Pramod K||Immunogenic cd91 ligand-antigenic molecule complexes and fusion proteins|
|US20060217307||Mar 6, 2006||Sep 28, 2006||Biomarck Pharmaceuticals, Ltd.||Methods for regulating inflammatory mediators and peptides useful therein|
|US20060234908||Dec 6, 2005||Oct 19, 2006||The Regents Of The University Of California||Methods for improving the structure and function of arterioles|
|US20070032430||Apr 18, 2006||Feb 8, 2007||The Regents Of The University Of California||Peptides and peptide mimetics to treat pathologies characterized by an inflammatory response|
|US20070060527||Jul 11, 2006||Mar 15, 2007||The Regents of the University of California and||Orally administered small peptides synergize statin activity|
|US20070254839||Mar 21, 2007||Nov 1, 2007||The Regents Of The University Of California||Orally administered peptides synergize statin activity|
|US20080045459||May 9, 2006||Feb 21, 2008||The Regents Of The University Of California||Orally administered peptides synergize statin activity|
|US20080095821||Jul 30, 2007||Apr 24, 2008||The Regents Of The University Of California||Peptides and peptide mimetics to treat pathologies characterized by an inflammatory response|
|US20080096814||Jul 30, 2007||Apr 24, 2008||The Regents Of The University Of California||Orally administered peptides synergize statin activity|
|US20080096815||Jul 30, 2007||Apr 24, 2008||The Regents Of The University Of California||Orally administered peptides synergize statin activity|
|US20080096816||Jul 30, 2007||Apr 24, 2008||The Regents Of The University Of California||Orally administered peptides synergize statin activity|
|AU2001286732B2||Title not available|
|AU2005287004A1||Title not available|
|CA2420222A1||Aug 23, 2001||Feb 28, 2002||The Regents Of The University Of California||Orally administered peptides to ameliorate atherosclerosis|
|1||Anantharamaiah (1986) "Synthetic Peptide Analogs of Appolipoproteins." Methods in Enrymology 128:627-647.|
|2||Anantharamaiah and Barber (1996) "Chromatographic Methods for Ouantitation of Apolipoprotein A-I." Meth. Enzymol 263: 267-282.|
|3||Anantharamaiah et al. (1985) "Studies of Synthetic Peptide of the Amphipathic Helix." The Journal of Biological Chemistry 260:10248-10255.|
|4||Anantharamaiah et al. (1990) "Use of Synthetic Peptide Analogues to Localize Lecithin: Cholseterol Acyltransf erase Activating Domain in Apolipoprotein A-I." Arteriosclerosis 10: 95-105.|
|5||Anantharamaiah et al. (1993) "An Atlas of the Amphipathic Helical Domains of Human Exchangeable Plasma Apolipoproteins." Chapter 6: pp. 109-142 In: The Amphipathic Helix (Epand, R. M., ed), CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.|
|6||Anderson BF, Baker HM, Norris GE, Rice DW, Baker EN. Structure of human lactoferrin: crystallographic structure analysis and refinement at .8 A resolution. J Mol Biol 1989; 209;711-734.|
|7||Aoyagi H, Ando S, Lee S, Izumiya N, Synthesis of antibacterial peptides-gramicidin S analogs and designed amphiphilic oligopeptides. Tetrahedron 1988; 44:877-886.|
|8||Aravinda, S., Shamala, N., Das, C. , Sriranjini, A. , Karle, I. And Balaram, P. Aromatic-Aromatic Interactions in Crystal Structures of Helical Peptide Scaffolds Containing Projecting Phenylalinine Residues, J.Am Chem Soc. 2003; 125:5308 5315.|
|9||Armstrong et al., (1993) D amino acid levels in human physiological fluids, Chirality, 5: 375-378.|
|10||Ashby D, Gamble J, Vadas M, Fidge N, Siggins S, Rye K, Barter PJ. Lack of effect of serum amyloid A (SAA) on the ability of high-density lipoproteins to inhibit endothelial cell adhesion molecule expression. Atherosclerosis. 2001;154:113-121.|
|11||Ashby et al., Factors infludencing the ability of HDL to inhibit expression of vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 in endothelial cells. Arteriosclerosis. Thrombosis and Vascular Biology, 1998; 18: 1450-1455.|
|12||Asokan R, Chandrakasan G, Puvanakrishnan R, Dhar SC. Separation and evaluation of changing pattern of glycosaminoglycans in 3-methyl cholanthrene induced fibrosarcoma. Neoplasma. 1989;36(3):273-9.|
|13||Asokan R, Puvanakrishnan R, Ravichandran LV, Kokila V, Reddy GK, Dhar SC. Purification and characterization of collagens from rat fibrosarcoma induced by 3-methylcholanthrene. Mol Cell Biochem. Apr. 21, 1993;121(2):99-107.|
|14||Australian Office Action dated Jan. 17, 2007 issued in AU 2006 2000035.|
|15||Australian Office Action dated Sep. 21, 2005 issued in AU 2001286732.|
|16||Badimon et al., (1990) "Regression of Atherosclerotic Lesions by High Density Lipoprotein lasma Fraction in the Cholesterol-fed Rabbit." J. Clinical Investigation 85:1234-1241.|
|17||Baker PW, Rye K-A, Gamble JR, Vadas MA, Barter PJ. Ability of reconstituted high density lipoproteins to inhibit cytokine-induced expression of vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 in human umbilical cell endothelial cells. Journal of Lipid Research, 1999, 40:345-353.|
|18||Baker PW, Rye KA, Gamble JR, Vadas MA, Barter PJ. Phospholid composition of reconstituted high density lipoproteins influences their ability to inhibit endothelial cell adhesion molecule expression. JLipid Res 2000;41:1261-1267.|
|19||Barter PJ, Baker PW, Rye K-A.. Effect of high-density lipoproteins on the expression of adhesion molecules in endothelial cells, Current Opinion in Lipidology, 2002, 13:285-288.|
|20||Barter PJ, Rye K-A. High density lipoproteins and coronary heart disease. Atherosclerosis, 1996, 121:1-12.|
|21||Bauer et al. (1982) "SMS 201-995: A Very Potent and Selective Octapeptide Analogue of Somatostatin with Prolonged Action" Life Sciences 31:1133-1140.|
|22||Baumbach et al. (2002) Circulation Res., 91: 931-937.|
|23||Baumbach et al. (2003) Hypertension, 41: 50-55.|
|24||Bisoendial et al. (2003) Circulation 107: 2944-2948.|
|25||Blankenberg S, Rupprecht Hi, Bickel C, Peetz D, Hafner G, Tiret L, Meyer J. Circulating cell adhesion molecules and death in patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation 2001;104:1336-1342.|
|26||Boffelli et al. (1997) "Reconstitution and Further Characterization of the Cholesterol Transport Activity of the Small-Intestinal Brush Border Membrane" Biochemistry 36:10784-10792.|
|27||Boffelli et al. (1999) "Crystal structure of truncated human apolipoprotein A-I suggests a lipid-bound conformation." Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 94:12291-12296.|
|28||Boffelli et al., (1997) The uptake of cholesterol at the small-intestinal brush border membrane is inhibited by apolipoproteins. FEBS Letters, 411: 7-11.|
|29||Borhani et al. (1999) Crystal structure of truncated human apolipoprotein A-1 suggests a lipid bound conformation. Proc. Natl.|
|30||Bourdillon MC, Poston RN, Covacho C, Chignier E, Bricca G, McGregor JL. ICAM 1 deficiency reduces atherosclerotic lesions in double-knockout mice (ApoE-/ ) IICAM-1(-/-)) fed a fat or a chow diet. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2000;20:2630-2635.|
|31||Bowry VW, Stanley KK, Stocker R. High density lipoprotein is the major carrier of lipid hydroperoxide in human blood plasma from fasting donors. Proc Nall Acad Sci U S A. 1992;89:10316-10320.|
|32||Brouillette and Anantharamaiah (1995) "Structural models of human apolipoprotein A-I." Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1256: 103-129.|
|33||Brouillette et al. (2001) "Structural Models of Human Apolipoprotein A-I: A Critical Analysis and Review" Biochemica et Biophysica Acta 55753:1-44.|
|34||Burger D, Dayer J-M. High-density lipoprotein-associated apolipoprotein A-I: the missing link between infection and chronic inflammation? Autoimmunity Reviews 2002;1:111-117.|
|35||Calabresi L, Franceschini G, Sirtoh CR, De Palma A, Saresella M, Ferrante P, Taramelli D. Inhibition of VCAM-1 expression in endothelial cells by reconstituted high density lipoproteins. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1997;238:61-65.|
|36||Calabresi L, Gomaraschi M, Villa B, Omoboni L, Dmitrieff C, Franceschini G. Elevated cellular adhesion molecules in subjects with low ML-cholesterol. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2002;22:656-661.|
|37||Campbell EJ. Human leukocyte elastase, cathepesin G and lactoferrin: family of neutrophil granule glycoproteins that bind to an alveolar macrophage receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1982; 79:6941-6945.|
|38||Canadian Pharmacists Association, Starlix General Monograph. http://cpha.infinetcomm.com/content/hcp/tools/cps-cnp-updates/starlix.cfm, (2002).|
|39||Carlos TM, Schwartz BR, Kovach NL, Yee E, Rosa M, Osborn L, Chi-Rosso G, Newman B, Lobb R, Rosso M, et al, Vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 mediates lymphocyte adherence to cytokine-activated cultured human endothelial cells. Blood 1990;76:965-970.|
|40||Carr AC, McCall MR, Frei B. Oxidation of LDL by myeloperoxidase and reactive nitrogen species oxidation of LDL by myeloperoxidase and reactive nitrogen species. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2000;20:1716-1723.|
|41||Casserly and Topol (2004) Lancet 363: 1139-1146.|
|42||Castelli WP, Garrison RJ, Wilson PW, Abbott RD, Kalousdian S, Kannel WB. Incidence of coronary heart disease and lipoprotein cholesterol levels. The Framingham study. JAMA 1986;256:2835-2838.|
|43||Chiesa G, Monteggia E, Marchesi M, Lorenzon P, Laucello M, Lorusso V, Di Mario C, Karvouni E, Newton RS, Bisgaier CL, Franceschini G, Sirtori CR. Recombinant apoliprotein A-I(Milano) infusion into rabbit carotid artery rapidly removes lipid from fatty streaks. Circ Res. 2002;90:974-980.|
|44||Chillon and Baumbach (2004) Hypertension, 33: 856-861.|
|45||Chinese Office Action dated Aug. 3, 2007 issued in CN03812668.0.|
|46||Chinese Office Action dated Feb. 5, 2007 issued in CN03812668.0.|
|47||Chinese Office Action dated Jan. 6, 2006 issued in CN03812668.0.|
|48||Christison J, Karjalainen A, Brauman J, Bygrave F, Stocker R. Rapid reduction and removal of HDL- but not LDL-associated cholesteryl ester hydroperoxides by rat liver in situ. Biochem J. 1996;314:739-742.|
|49||Chung et al., (1985) "Studies of Synthetic Peptide Analogs of the Amphipathic Helix." J. 8iol. Chem. 60(18): 10256-10262.|
|50||Cockeerill GW, Huehns TY, Weerasinghe A, Stocker C, Lerch PG, Miller NE, Haskard DO. Elevation of plasma high-density lipoprotein concentration reduces interleukin-1 induced expression of E-selectin in an in vivo model of acute inflammation. Rculation 2001;103:108-112.|
|51||Cockerill GW, Rye KA, Gamble JR, Vadas MA, Barter PJ. High-density lipoproteins inhibit crone-induced expression of endothelial cell adhesion molecules. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1995;15:1987-1994.|
|52||EP Office Action dated Jan. 9, 2007, issued in EP 1318828.|
|53||International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jun. 21, 2006 from WO/2006/063132.|
|54||International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Sep. 8, 2004 from WO 2004/034977.|
|55||International Search Report dated Apr. 19, 2006 from WO/2006/034056.|
|56||International Search Report dated Jan. 3, 2002 from WO2002/015923.|
|57||International Search Report dated Oct. 25, 2002 from WO2002/015923.|
|58||Israeli Office Action dated Nov. 6, 2006 issued in IL-154545.|
|59||Japanese Office Action dated May 19, 2005 issued in JP2002-520844.|
|60||Japanese Office Action dated May 29, 2007 issued in JP2006-220831.|
|61||Japanese Office Action dated Oct. 31, 2006 issued in JP2006-220831.|
|62||Notice of Allowance and Allowed Claims dated Dec. 20, 2004 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/896,841.|
|63||Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 2, 2006 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/273,386.|
|64||Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 25, 2003 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/645,454.|
|65||Notice of Allowance dated May 1, 2006 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/187,215.|
|66||Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 21, 2006 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/423,830.|
|67||U.S. Appl. No. 10/269,755, filed Oct. 11, 2002, Fogelman et al.|
|68||U.S. Appl. No. 11/229,042, filed Sep. 16, 2005, Fogelman et al.|
|69||U.S. Appl. No. 11/431,412, filed May 9, 2006, Fogelman et al.|
|70||U.S. Appl. No. 11/541,481, filed Sep. 29, 2006, Fogelman et al.|
|71||U.S. Appl. No. 11/541,482, filed Sep. 29, 2006, Fogelman et al.|
|72||U.S. Appl. No. 11/541,494, filed Sep. 29, 2006, Fogelman et al.|
|73||U.S. Appl. No. 11/689,037, filed Mar. 21, 2007, Fogelman et al.|
|74||U.S. Appl. No. 11/830,497, filed Jul. 30, 2007, Fogelman et al.|
|75||U.S. Appl. No. 11/830,664, filed Jul. 30, 2007, Fogelman et al.|
|76||U.S. Appl. No. 11/830,675, filed Jul. 30, 2007, Fogelman et al.|
|77||U.S. Appl. No. 11/830,687, filed Jul. 30, 2007, Fogelman et al.|
|78||U.S. Appl. No. 11/835,338, filed Aug. 7, 2007, Fogelman et al.|
|79||U.S. Appl. No. 11/950,315, filed Dec. 4, 2007, Fogelman et al.|
|80||U.S. Appl. No. 60/968,815, filed Aug. 29, 2007, Fogelman et al.|
|81||US Final Office Action dated Apr. 11, 2005 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/187,215.|
|82||US Final Office Action dated Feb. 2, 2005 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/273,386.|
|83||US Final Office Action dated Mar. 31, 2006 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/273,386.|
|84||US Final Office Action dated May 7, 2004 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/896,841.|
|85||US Final Office Action dated Nov. 15, 2005 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/423,830.|
|86||US Office Action dated Apr. 18, 2005 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/423,830.|
|87||US Office Action dated Aug. 17, 2007 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/229,042.|
|88||US Office Action dated Aug. 26, 2004 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/187,215.|
|89||US Office Action dated Jan. 23, 2003 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/645,454.|
|90||US Office Action dated Jan. 8, 2004 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/187,215.|
|91||US Office Action dated Jun. 21, 2004 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/273,386.|
|92||US Office Action dated Oct. 21, 2003 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/896,841.|
|93||US Office Action dated Oct. 28, 2005 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/187,215.|
|94||US Office Action dated Sep. 12, 2002 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/645,454.|
|95||US Office Action dated Sep. 7, 2005 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/273,386.|
|96||Vietnamese Office Action date Oct. 2, 2007 from VN 1-2007-01344.|
|97||Written Opinion dated Apr. 19, 2006 from WO/2006/034056.|
|98||Written Opinion dated May 20, 2002 from WO2002/015923.|
|99||Written Opinion issued Apr. 18, 2007 in WO/2006/118805.|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US7723303||Apr 18, 2006||May 25, 2010||The Regents Of The University Of California||Peptides and peptide mimetics to treat pathologies characterized by an inflammatory response|
|US7807640||Mar 21, 2007||Oct 5, 2010||The Regents Of The University Of California||Orally administered peptides synergize statin activity|
|US7820784||Jul 30, 2007||Oct 26, 2010||The Regents Of The University Of California||Orally administered peptides synergize statin activity|
|US7994132||Jul 30, 2007||Aug 9, 2011||The Regents Of The University Of California||Peptides for treatment of scleroderma|
|US8048851 *||Jul 30, 2007||Nov 1, 2011||The Regents Of The University Of California||Peptides and peptide mimetics to treat pathologies characterized by an inflammatory response|
|US8148328||Aug 7, 2007||Apr 3, 2012||The Regents Of The University Of California||Salicylanilides enhance oral delivery of therapeutic peptides|
|US8236754||Jun 4, 2009||Aug 7, 2012||The Regents Of The University Of California||Methods for improving the structure and function of arterioles|
|US8404635||Jul 11, 2011||Mar 26, 2013||The Regents Of The University Of California||Orally administered peptides synergize statin activity|
|US8557767||Aug 27, 2008||Oct 15, 2013||Uab Research Foundation||Synthetic apolipoprotein E mimicking polypeptides and methods of use|
|US8568766||Feb 7, 2008||Oct 29, 2013||Gattadahalli M. Anantharamaiah||Peptides and peptide mimetics to treat pathologies associated with eye disease|
|US9422363||Aug 27, 2008||Aug 23, 2016||Uab Research Foundation||Synthetic apolipoprotein E mimicking polypeptides and methods of use|
|US9539300||Mar 7, 2013||Jan 10, 2017||The Regents Of The University Of California||Modulating disease through genetic engineering of plants|
|US20060205669 *||Sep 16, 2005||Sep 14, 2006||The Regents Of The University Of California||G-type peptides and other agents to ameliorate atherosclerosis and other pathologies|
|US20070032430 *||Apr 18, 2006||Feb 8, 2007||The Regents Of The University Of California||Peptides and peptide mimetics to treat pathologies characterized by an inflammatory response|
|US20070254839 *||Mar 21, 2007||Nov 1, 2007||The Regents Of The University Of California||Orally administered peptides synergize statin activity|
|US20080095821 *||Jul 30, 2007||Apr 24, 2008||The Regents Of The University Of California||Peptides and peptide mimetics to treat pathologies characterized by an inflammatory response|
|US20080096814 *||Jul 30, 2007||Apr 24, 2008||The Regents Of The University Of California||Orally administered peptides synergize statin activity|
|US20080096816 *||Jul 30, 2007||Apr 24, 2008||The Regents Of The University Of California||Orally administered peptides synergize statin activity|
|US20080293639 *||Dec 4, 2007||Nov 27, 2008||The Regents Of The University Of California||Peptides and peptide mimetics to treat pathologies characterized by an inflammatory response|
|US20090163408 *||Aug 7, 2007||Jun 25, 2009||The Regents Of The University Of California||Salicylanilides enhance oral delivery of therapeutic peptides|
|US20100227825 *||Mar 10, 2010||Sep 9, 2010||The Regents Of The University Of California||Peptides and peptide mimetics to treat cancer|
|US20120245101 *||Mar 23, 2012||Sep 27, 2012||Anantharamaiah Gattadahalli M||Synthetic apolipoprotein e mimicking polypeptides and methods of use|
|WO2015173633A2||Apr 30, 2015||Nov 19, 2015||Cerenis Therapeutics Holding Sa||Hdl therapy markers|
|U.S. Classification||514/1.1, 530/326, 514/1.9|
|International Classification||A61K31/40, A61K38/16, A61K31/405, A61K31/505, A61K31/47, A61K31/44, A61K31/22, C07K14/00, A61K31/366, A61K38/02, C07K14/775, A61K38/00, A61K38/10, C07K7/08|
|Cooperative Classification||Y02P20/55, A61K38/10, A61K31/22, A61K31/40, C07K14/001, A61K31/47, A61K31/405, A61K31/505, C07K7/08, A61K31/366, C07K14/775, A61K38/16, A61K31/44|
|European Classification||A61K31/40, A61K31/47, A61K31/44, A61K31/505, A61K31/366, C07K7/08, C07K14/00B, A61K31/405, C07K14/775, A61K38/16, A61K31/22, A61K38/10|
|Dec 1, 2006||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: THE UAB RESEARCH FOUNDATION, ALABAMA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:ANANTHARAMAIAH, GATTADAHALLI M.;REEL/FRAME:018575/0414
Effective date: 20061128
Owner name: THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, CALIF
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:FOGELMAN, ALAN M.;NAVAB, MOHAMAD;REEL/FRAME:018575/0412;SIGNING DATES FROM 20061111 TO 20061120
|Nov 12, 2012||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|Mar 1, 2013||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH (NIH), U.S. DEPT. OF
Free format text: CONFIRMATORY LICENSE;ASSIGNOR:UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES;REEL/FRAME:029903/0050
Effective date: 20130206
|Nov 14, 2016||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 8