|Publication number||US7557608 B2|
|Application number||US 11/498,214|
|Publication date||Jul 7, 2009|
|Filing date||Aug 1, 2006|
|Priority date||Aug 16, 2000|
|Also published as||US6661253, US7119574, US7800405, US20070008000, US20090267645|
|Publication number||11498214, 498214, US 7557608 B2, US 7557608B2, US-B2-7557608, US7557608 B2, US7557608B2|
|Inventors||Andy L Lee, Wanli Chang, Cameron McClintock, John E Turner, Brian D Johnson, Chiao Kai Hwang, Richard Yen-Hsiang Chang, Richard G Cliff|
|Original Assignee||Altera Corporation|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (29), Non-Patent Citations (6), Referenced by (1), Classifications (14), Legal Events (1) |
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
Passgate structures for use in low-voltage applications
US 7557608 B2
Enhanced passgate structures for use in low-voltage systems are presented in which the influence of Vt on the range of signals passed by single-transistor passgates is reduced. In one arrangement, the VGATE-Vt limit for signals propagated through NMOS passgates is raised by applying a higher VGATE; in another arrangement, the Vt is lowered. The use of CMOS passgates in applications where single-transistor passgates have traditionally been used is also presented.
1. A programmable logic device, comprising:
an array of logic blocks;
a plurality of interconnect lines; and
a plurality of switches for programmably routing logic signals between the logic blocks over the interconnect lines, wherein each switch includes a transistor having a thick gate oxide for receiving a gate-activating voltage that exceeds a logical high voltage associated with the transistor.
2. The programmable logic device of claim 1, wherein the switches comprise passgate transistors.
3. The programmable logic device of claim 1
, further comprising:
input/output circuitry that is powered at the gate-activating voltage; and
core circuitry that is powered at the system voltage.
4. The programmable logic device of claim 1, wherein a plurality of the switches form a multiplexer that provides multiplexed connections between the logic blocks and the interconnect lines.
5. The programmable logic device of claim 1, wherein a plurality of the switches form a multiplexer that provides multiplexed connections between at least two of the interconnect lines.
6. A programmable logic device, comprising:
a first plurality of transistors having a first gate oxide thickness;
a second plurality of transistors having a second gate oxide thickness, wherein the second gate oxide thickness that is thicker than the first gate oxide thickness and wherein a gate-activating voltage of the second plurality of transistors exceeds a logical high voltage associated with the second plurality of transistors.
7. The programmable logic device of claim 6, wherein the second plurality of transistors comprise passgate transistors.
8. The programmable logic device of claim 6, wherein the second plurality of transistors form a plurality of switches for routing signals within the programmable logic device.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/637,258, filed Aug. 8, 2003, which is a division of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/931,475, filed Aug. 16, 2001, which is a nonprovisional of U.S. provisional patent application No. 60/225,585, filed Aug. 16, 2000. All of these prior applications are hereby incorporated by reference herein in their entireties.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to integrated circuit devices, and more particularly to the passgate structures which may be used in such devices.
One of the most ubiquitous structures within an integrated circuit device is the single-transistor passgate, which is commonly used to implement (either singly or in combination with other circuits) switches, multiplexers, logic functions (e.g., pass transistor logic), and gating mechanisms for tristatable circuits (e.g., buffers and drivers). In some integrated circuit devices, single-transistor passgate structures may account for a significant portion of the circuitry; for example, in the case of programmable logic devices, single-transistor passgates are used extensively throughout the device as part of the programmable interconnection circuitry.
The operation of a typical single-transistor passgate may be succinctly illustrated by a description of an NMOS passgate (analogous principles of operation, as understood by one skilled in the art, would apply for a PMOS passgate). Depending on whether the potential difference between its gate terminal, VGATE, and its source terminal, VSOURCE, exceeds the threshold voltage, Vt, an NMOS passgate acts as an “open” or a “closed” switch. (As is well-known in the art, there is no physical difference between the “source” and “drain” terminals of an MOS device; the source terminal of an NMOS transistor is the terminal having the lower voltage.) When VGATE-VSOURCE is less than Vt, the NMOS passgate is in the “cutoff” state, thereby acting as an “open” switch; when VGATE-VSOURCE is greater than Vt, the NMOS passgate is in the conduction state, thereby acting as a “closed” switch.
Accordingly, a ceiling is imposed on the output of an NMOS passgate in that it cannot exceed VGATE-Vt (since the NMOS passgate starts to enter the “cutoff” mode when VGATE-VSOURCE approaches Vt). For example, when VGATE and a logic HIGH signal to be passed by an NMOS passgate both correspond to the positive supply level, VDD, the signal that may be passed to the output of the NMOS passgate is limited to VDD-Vt. Extending the analysis to the case of PMOS passgates, a lower limit equal to |Vt| is imposed on logic LOW signals that may be passed. (As is well-known in the art, Vt is not a discrete value for an MOS transistor; it may be considered a range of values that is influenced by a variety of second-order effects, such as substrate bias and subthreshold conduction. However, in order to simplify the illustration of the principles of the present invention, Vt will be discussed herein as if it is a discrete value rather than a range of values.)
With the current trend in scaling down device geometries and the consequent use of ever-lower operating voltages (e.g., supply voltages, bias voltages, etc.), which are nearing levels comparable to Vt, the ability of single-transistor passgate structures to reliably pass recognizable logic levels will become more difficult in view of the influence Vt exerts on the logic levels that may be propagated (i.e., the VGATE-Vt ceiling imposed on the logic HIGH voltage levels that are passed by NMOS passgates, and the |Vt| lower limit on the logic LOW signals that are passed by PMOS passgates).
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to enhanced passgate structures for use in low-voltage systems. In accordance with the principles of the present invention, various techniques are presented for mitigating the effect of Vt on the range of signals that may be propagated through single-transistor passgates. Although the techniques described herein are illustrated using NMOS passgates, they may be readily adapted to PMOS structures.
In one arrangement, the VGATE-Vt limit imposed on the logic HIGH signals passed by NMOS passgates may be raised by applying higher VGATE levels, which may be provided from a variety of sources. Alternatively, the VGATE-Vt ceiling may be raised by lowering Vt via process adjustments during fabrication and/or by tuning the biasing voltage of the well in which the passgate is fabricated.
Also, the use of CMOS passgates in applications where single-transistor passgates have traditionally been used is presented.
Further features of the invention, its nature and various advantages will be more apparent from the accompanying drawings and the following detailed description of the invention.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a schematic representation of an enhanced passgate structure which may be constructed in accordance with the principles of the present invention.
FIG. 2 is a simplified illustration of an aspect of an integrated circuit device which may be fabricated in accordance with the principles of the present invention.
FIG. 3 is a simplified illustration of an aspect of another integrated circuit device which may be fabricated in accordance with the principles of the present invention.
FIG. 4 is a schematic representation of another enhanced passgate structure which may be constructed in accordance with the principles of the present invention.
FIG. 5 illustrates an aspect of the enhanced passgate structure of FIG. 4 in greater detail.
FIG. 6 is a schematic representation of a passgate structure which may be used in accordance with the principles of the present invention.
FIG. 7 is a simplified block diagram of a programmable logic device.
FIG. 8 illustrates how an aspect of the programmable logic device of FIG. 7 may be improved in accordance with the principles of the present invention.
FIG. 9 is a simplified block diagram of an illustrative system that includes an integrated circuit device which has been improved in accordance with the principles of the present invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
For the purpose of simplifying the discussion of the principles of the present invention, the techniques and embodiments described herein will focus on NMOS passgates. However, the principles illustrated herein are applicable to similar arrangements involving PMOS passgates.
FIG. 1 illustrates one arrangement for reducing the effect of Vt on the range of signals that may be passed by NMOS passgates in accordance with the principles of the present invention. In the arrangement shown in FIG. 1, the effect of the VGATE-Vt limit on the signals passed by NMOS passgate 100 may be offset by applying as VGATE a voltage level that exceeds the logic HIGH signals, VH, to be passed by NMOS passgate 100. For example, if VH corresponds to the positive supply voltage, VDD, then a VGATE that exceeds VDD would be applied to NMOS passgate 100 to turn it “ON”. In some designs, depending on the process being used and the voltage difference between VH and the higher VGATE, NMOS passgate 100 may be a high-voltage tolerant transistor, such as a thick-oxide device, in order to reliably handle the higher VGATE.
For the purposes of the present invention, VGATE may be a static bias voltage or a dynamic signal. In one embodiment, as illustrated in FIG. 1, the higher VGATE may be derived from any of a variety of sources 104, such as the positive I/O supply voltage, VDD-I/O (e.g., when the core circuitry and the I/O circuitry have separate power supplies and VDD-I/O is greater than VH), an I/O pin (e.g., control/data signals provided from an external source that uses signalling levels higher than VH), or a dedicated external pin on which a voltage greater than VH is applied (e.g., bias voltages, auxiliary power supply voltages, etc.).
In other embodiments, depending on the application, the higher VGATE may also be generated by any of a variety of voltage boosting/conversion circuitry such as charge pumps and voltage converters (e.g., DC/DC, AC/DC, etc.).
Rather than increasing VGATE, another way to raise the VGATE-Vt ceiling is to lower the threshold voltage, Vt. Although transistors may be fabricated with threshold voltages close to zero volts (e.g., “native” devices), there is a tradeoff between decreasing Vt and increasing the leakage current during the “OFF” state. In accordance with the principles of the present invention, it is thus preferable to lower the associated threshold voltages of those specific transistors which may be used as passgates.
One arrangement for accomplishing this is shown in FIG. 2, which schematically illustrates a portion of a representative integrated circuit device 20, in which two transistors have been fabricated with different threshold voltages. As shown in FIG. 2, one of the transistors 200, which is to be configured for operation as part of a circuit other than a passgate structure, may be fabricated with an associated Vt equal to Vx, whereas the other transistor 201, which is to be configured for operation as a passgate, may be fabricated with an associated Vt that is less than Vx. Expanding on the arrangement shown in FIG. 2, FIG. 3 shows a portion of an integrated circuit device 30, which is divided into different sections 301/302/303, wherein all the transistors within a given section have been fabricated with a specific threshold voltage that may be different from that of the transistors in the other sections. For example, sections 301 and 302 may each be a routing network with a high concentration of passgates (which may be used to construct, for example, interconnection switches and multiplexers). Accordingly, the transistors in sections 301 and 302 could be fabricated with a Vt that is lower than that of the transistors in other sections 303.
As an alternative, or in addition, to selectively fabricating low Vt transistors, FIGS. 4 and 5 illustrate an arrangement wherein a lower Vt may be achieved by controlling the bias voltage, VBIAS, of the well 405 in which the NMOS passgate 400 is fabricated. For the purposes of the present invention, NMOS passgate 400 is preferably fabricated in a well 405 which is capable of being biased to a voltage that is different from that which is used to bias the substrate 520. In the illustrative embodiment shown in FIG. 5, for example, a triple-well process may be used to allow p-well 405 to be biased separately from the p-substrate 520, thereby allowing the Vt of NMOS passgate 400 to be adjusted as a function of the source-to-bulk potential difference, VSB, which, in the arrangement shown in FIG. 5, is dependent on VBIAS. The relationship between Vt and VSB for an NMOS transistor, which should be familiar to those skilled in the art, may be expressed as follows:
V t=V t0+γ[sqrt (VSB+2ΦF)−sqrt(2ΦF)]
(wherein Vt0 is the threshold voltage when VSB is zero, g is the body-effect constant, and ΦF is a term associated with the doping of the well). Accordingly, the Vt of NMOS passgate 400 may thus be lowered by creating a negative VSB by setting the bias voltage, VBIAS, of well 405 to a level that is higher than the voltage level present on the source terminal of NMOS passgate 400. For the purposes of the present invention, VBIAS should not be high enough to forward bias the junction between the source/drain 401/402 and the p-well 405. Accordingly, in some embodiments, VBIAS may be set to a voltage that is slightly higher than the lowest possible voltage that may be present on the source terminal (e.g., if the lowest possible voltage that could be applied to the source terminal is ground, then VBIAS would be set to a voltage level that is slightly above ground).
In accordance with the principles of the present invention, VBIAS may be derived from any of a variety of sources and bias generation schemes 500, which may be either internal or external to the integrated circuit device which includes NMOS passgate 400. Such sources 500 may include external pins, charge pumps, voltage references, voltage dividers, level-shifters, control/feedback circuitry, and the like. In some designs, VBIAS may be provided as a static voltage, which may or may not correspond to any of the supply voltages used on the integrated circuit device. In other designs, it may be preferable to use a dynamic voltage for VBIAS, which may be provided by a control circuit that generates a variable VBIAS that may be a function of any of a variety of parameters, such as process variations, temperature, voltage, current, or a combination thereof. As a result, the Vt of NMOS passgate 400 may be tuned in a feedback loop to achieve a low Vt that optimizes, for example, the tradeoff between lowering Vt and increasing leakage current. In accordance with the principles of the present invention, the techniques described in the foregoing, and illustrated in FIGS. 1-5, for reducing the effect of Vt on the VGATE-Vt ceiling on signals passed by NMOS passgates may be combined to achieve an even greater reduction.
Instead of increasing VGATE or modifying Vt in order to raise the VGATE-Vt ceiling imposed on signals passed by single-transistor NMOS passgates, the effect of Vt may be eliminated by using a fully complementary passgate structure, such as CMOS passgate 60 shown in FIG. 6. For some applications (e.g., interconnection switches, multiplexers, gating mechanisms for tristatable circuits, etc.), the use of single-transistor passgates has traditionally been preferred because a CMOS passgate includes at least two transistors (NMOS transistor 600 and PMOS transistor 610), and may further include auxiliary circuitry for generating and/or accommodating complementary VGATE signals (e.g., inverter 620 shown in FIG. 6), thereby taking up more area and having more parasitic capacitance than a single-transistor passgate.
Despite the increased area and capacitance, however, the use of CMOS passgates in those applications (e.g., interconnection switches for programmable logic devices) where single-transistor passgates have traditionally been used may be reasonable in view of the trend in scaling down supply voltages since CMOS structures scale easily and are capable of passing full logic levels.
The above-described passgate structures 10/201/40/60 that may be constructed in accordance with the principles of the present invention are especially useful in integrated circuit devices, such as programmable logic devices, in which such passgate structures are used as interconnection switches to allow programmable routing and switching. FIG. 7 is a simplified block diagram of an illustrative programmable logic device 70 in which interconnection switches using passgate structures that have been constructed in accordance with the principles of the present invention may be readily used. Programmable logic device 70 includes a plurality of regions of programmable logic 710 operatively disposed in a two-dimensional array of rows and columns, and a programmable network of horizontal 730 and vertical 735 interconnection conductors for conveying signals amongst the logic regions 710 and various I/O structures 780. In the network of interconnection conductors 730/735, signals may be programmably routed via interconnection switches 700, which, in some designs, may also be grouped to form multiplexers. In some embodiments, programmable logic device 70 may also include any of a variety of functional blocks 750, such as memory structures, multiplier/accumulator blocks, arithmetic logic units, microprocessors, etc. Functional blocks 750 may be dedicated structures that are configured to implement a specific function, or, alternatively, they may be user-programmable/reconfigurable structures.
FIG. 8 illustrates in greater detail how interconnection switches 700 may be used in the network of interconnection conductors 730/735 to route signals within programmable logic device 70. For the purpose of illustrating the principles of the present invention, a signal source/destination within programmable logic device 70 may be any of the logic regions 710, functional blocks 750, I/O structures 780, or other circuitry within programmable logic device 70. As schematically illustrated in FIG. 8, a signal may be routed from any given source to any given destination by using interconnection switches 700 to multiplex or switch signals provided on the output leads 725 of signal source 710/750/780/etc. onto the network of interconnection conductors 730/735 (within which interconnection switches 700 may also be used to programmably connect one interconnection conductor to another), from which the signal may be eventually multiplexed or switched onto the input lead 720 of signal destination 710/750/780/etc. As shown in FIG. 8, the electrical characteristics of the network of interconnection conductors 730/735 may be represented as a chain of resistors 820 and capacitors 821 a/b in a “black-box” abstraction.
Also shown in FIG. 8 is one embodiment of an interconnection switch 700 that may be constructed using the above-described enhanced passgate structures in accordance with the principles of the present invention. As illustrated in FIG. 8, interconnection switch 700 may include any of the passgates 10/201/40/60 as the switching mechanism. In some embodiments, a pair of inverters 801 a and 801 b, along with a “half-latch” PMOS transistor 802, may also be included to provide buffering of the input and output signals.
FIG. 9 shows how an integrated circuit device 90 (e.g., a programmable logic device) employing any of the enhanced passgate structures that have been described in the foregoing may be used in a system 900. System 900 may include one or more of the following components: various peripheral devices 902, I/O circuitry 903, a processor 904, and a memory 905. These components may be coupled together by a system bus 901 and may be populated on a circuit board 906 which is contained in an end-user system 907.
System 900 can be used in a wide variety of applications, such as computer networking, data networking, instrumentation, video processing, digital signal processing, or any other application where the advantage of using programmable or reprogrammable logic is desirable. Integrated circuit device 90, employing passgate structures that have been constructed in accordance with the principles of the present invention, may be used to perform a variety of different logic functions. For example, integrated circuit device 90 can be configured as a processor or controller that works in cooperation with processor 904. Integrated circuit device 90 may also be used as an arbiter for arbitrating access to a shared resource in system 900. In yet another example, integrated circuit device 90 may be configured as an interface between processor 904 and one of the other components in system 900.
Various technologies may be used to implement the integrated circuit device 90 employing passgate structures that have been constructed in accordance with the principles of the present invention. Moreover, this invention is applicable to both one-time-only programmable and reprogrammable devices.
Thus, it is seen that enhanced passgate structures for an integrated circuit device have been presented. One skilled in the art will appreciate that the present invention may be practiced by other than the described embodiments, which are presented for purposes of illustration and not of limitation, and the present invention is limited only by the claims which follow.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US4713557||Feb 11, 1987||Dec 15, 1987||Xilinx, Inc.||Bidirectional buffer amplifier|
|US4821233||Jun 2, 1988||Apr 11, 1989||Xilinx, Incorporated||5-transistor memory cell with known state on power-up|
|US4831596||May 1, 1987||May 16, 1989||Texas Instruments Incorporated||Pass gate with low transistor junction breakdown susceptibility|
|US5119337||Apr 16, 1990||Jun 2, 1992||Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba||Semiconductor memory device having burn-in test function|
|US5291079||Jul 23, 1992||Mar 1, 1994||Xilinx, Inc.||Configuration control unit for programming a field programmable gate array and reading array status|
|US5544097||Mar 31, 1995||Aug 6, 1996||Sgs-Thomson Microelectronics, Inc.||SRAM memory cell with reduced internal cell voltage|
|US5574634||Jan 3, 1994||Nov 12, 1996||Xilinx, Inc.||Regulator for pumped voltage generator|
|US5706226||Dec 31, 1996||Jan 6, 1998||Sgs-Thomson Microelectronics, Inc.||Low voltage CMOS SRAM|
|US5717340||Jan 17, 1996||Feb 10, 1998||Xilink, Inc.||Circuit for testing pumped voltage gates in a programmable gate array|
|US5760605||Sep 30, 1996||Jun 2, 1998||Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.||Programmable high speed routing switch|
|US5783962||Jul 8, 1996||Jul 21, 1998||Siemens Aktiengesellschaft||Bootstrap circuit and integrated memory circuit having the bootstrap circuit|
|US5841694 *||Jul 30, 1997||Nov 24, 1998||Programmable Silicon Solutions||High performance programmable interconnect|
|US5880620||Apr 22, 1997||Mar 9, 1999||Xilinx, Inc.||Pass gate circuit with body bias control|
|US5959933||Apr 18, 1997||Sep 28, 1999||Micron Technology, Inc.||System for improved memory cell access|
|US6177831||Jul 15, 1996||Jan 23, 2001||Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha||Semiconductor integrated circuit with well potential control circuit|
|US6278290 *||Aug 13, 1999||Aug 21, 2001||Xilinx, Inc.||Method and circuit for operating programmable logic devices during power-up and stand-by modes|
|US6307420||Jul 7, 2000||Oct 23, 2001||Xilinx, Inc.||Circuit with ramp-up control for overcoming a threshold voltage loss in an NMOS transistor|
|US6366498||Aug 30, 1999||Apr 2, 2002||Altera Corporation||Nonvolatile configuration cells and cell arrays|
|US6396325||Feb 9, 2001||May 28, 2002||Fairchild Semiconductor Corporation||High frequency MOSFET switch|
|US6504212||Feb 3, 2000||Jan 7, 2003||International Business Machines Corporation||Method and apparatus for enhanced SOI passgate operations|
|US6535034 *||Jul 30, 1997||Mar 18, 2003||Programmable Silicon Solutions||High performance integrated circuit devices adaptable to use lower supply voltages with smaller device geometries|
|US6563357||Dec 20, 2001||May 13, 2003||Intel Corporation||Level converting latch|
|US6577514||Apr 5, 2001||Jun 10, 2003||Saifun Semiconductors Ltd.||Charge pump with constant boosted output voltage|
|US6661253 *||Aug 16, 2001||Dec 9, 2003||Altera Corporation||Passgate structures for use in low-voltage applications|
|US6876572||May 21, 2003||Apr 5, 2005||Altera Corporation||Programmable logic devices with stabilized configuration cells for reduced soft error rates|
|US20030053335||Sep 18, 2001||Mar 20, 2003||Xilinx, Inc.||Structures and methods for selectively applying a well bias to portions of a programmable device|
|US20030071681||Oct 11, 2002||Apr 17, 2003||Rohm Co., Ltd.||IC device having a transistor switch for a power supply|
|US20030097628||Oct 10, 2002||May 22, 2003||Ngo Ninh D.||Error detection on programmable logic resources|
|USRE34363||Jun 24, 1991||Aug 31, 1993||Xilinx, Inc.||Configurable electrical circuit having configurable logic elements and configurable interconnects|
|1||Apex 20K Programmable Logic Device Family, Data Sheet, Altera Corporation, Ver. 2.06, pp. 1-208, Mar. 2000.|
|2||Betz et al., "FPGA Routing Architecture: Segmentation and Buffering to Optimize Speed and Density," Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Texas, pp. 59-68, Feb. 1999.|
|3||Dobbelaere et al., "Regenerative Feedback Repeaters for Programmable Interconnections," IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 30, No. 11, pp. 1247-1253.|
|4||FLEX 10K Embedded Programmable Logic Family, Data Sheet, Altera Corporation, Ver. 4.01, pp. 1-137, Jun. 1999.|
|5||FLEX 8000 Progrmmable Logic Device Family, Data Sheet, Altera Corporation, Ver. 10.01, pp. 349-410, Jun. 1999.|
|6||XC3000 Series Field Programmable Gate Arrays (XC3100A/L), Product Description, Xilinx, Inc., Ver. 3.1, pp. 7-3 through 7-78, Nov. 9, 1998.|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US8707244||Aug 20, 2010||Apr 22, 2014||Altera Corporation||Methods and systems for performing signal activity extraction|
| || |
|U.S. Classification||326/41, 326/47, 326/113|
|International Classification||H03K17/06, H01L25/00, H03K19/177|
|Cooperative Classification||H03K19/17736, H03K17/063, H03K19/1778, H03K19/177|
|European Classification||H03K17/06B, H03K19/177F, H03K19/177J, H03K19/177|
|Jan 2, 2013||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4