|Publication number||US7596216 B2|
|Application number||US 12/243,326|
|Publication date||Sep 29, 2009|
|Filing date||Oct 1, 2008|
|Priority date||Sep 5, 2003|
|Also published as||US7239690, US7450710, US20050053219, US20070217592, US20090028319, US20090304171|
|Publication number||12243326, 243326, US 7596216 B2, US 7596216B2, US-B2-7596216, US7596216 B2, US7596216B2|
|Inventors||Larry B. Pearson, Dianna Inara Tiliks, John Wesley Moss, Barbara Allyn Vozar, Robert Carl Hager|
|Original Assignee||At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P.|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (2), Referenced by (1), Classifications (16), Legal Events (3)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
This application is a Continuation patent application of, and claims priority from, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/801,971, filed on May 11, 2007 and entitled “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR IDENTIFYING REDIRECTED CALLS,” which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/656,928, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,239,690, filed on Sep. 5, 2003 and entitled “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR IDENTIFYING REDIRECTED CALLS,” both of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
This disclosure, in general, relates to systems and methods for identifying redirected calls.
As the population becomes more reliant on telecommunications services, more people utilize call-forwarding features to avoid missing calls. Call forwarding can typically be activated to redirect phone calls made to a particular phone to an alternate number. However, when calls are received at the alternate number, there is typically no indication that the call has been redirected.
One might expect that inbound forwarded calls could be identified using caller ID. However, caller ID only provides the original call party number, when available, and not the intermediate phone numbers through which the call has been forwarded. Assuming that the calling party number is available through caller ID, the phone number might be used by the subscriber to determine whether the call was forwarded or dialed directly. However, the determination, in this case, is unreliable. A co-worker may dial the subscriber's office phone after hours just to leave a message. The co-worker would not expect that the call would be answered. In this case, the subscriber might let the call forward to a voice mail service or allow an answering machine to pick up the call. However, what if it were an emergency and the co-worker dialed the subscriber's home number directly? The subscriber might not answer the call, not recognizing the urgency of the inbound call. As such, in these typical systems, the subscriber cannot differentiate direct inbound calls from calls forwarded through another number.
As such, typical call-forwarding systems or features may result in confusion on both the part of the subscriber and originating callers. Therefore, an improved system and method for call redirection would be desirable.
This disclosure, in general, relates to systems and methods for identifying redirected calls. In one embodiment, a service control point identifies forwarded or redirected calls and a distinctive ring is used to notify the user that the call has been redirected from another phone number.
The SSP 206 may make a query to a service control point (SCP) 210 via a signal transfer point (STP) 208. The STP 208 may be used to route messages between the SSP 206 and SCP 210. The STP 208 routes messages between networking elements. The SSP 206 may query the SCP 210 upon receiving a call termination attempt message to check for call features such as voicemail, call-forwarding, and other telephone service related features. The call termination attempt message and the query associated with the call termination attempt may include a caller's network address, the receiving phone network address and if the call has been redirected, the phone network address through which the call was redirected (redirected phone address). The SCP 210 receives the query and determines whether the call has been redirected. If the call has been redirected and a redirected call ring feature is active for the receiving phone network address, the SCP 210 may direct the SSP 206 to utilize a distinctive ring, indicating that the call has been redirected. If the call has not been redirected, and is dialed direct to the receiving phone or if the redirected call ring feature is not active, the call may be initialized utilizing a generic ring.
A distinctive ring may be a ring pattern or musical score played through a telephone or communication device that differs from the ring pattern typically used to indicate an incoming call. The ring pattern typically used to indicate an incoming call is the generic ring. In one embodiment, the distinctive ring may be a ring pattern that is faster or slower than the generic ring pattern. In another embodiment, the distinctive ring may use a mixed tempo pattern or a musical score. In an exemplary embodiment of the SCP 210, a user may create a pattern, select a pattern from a list, or download a desired pattern.
In another embodiment, the SCP 210 may compare the redirected phone network address to a specific network address. If the redirected network address matches the specific address, a specific distinctive ring may be utilized to indicate that the call has been redirected from the specific network address. The SCP 210 may also utilize a second distinctive ring to indicate that a call has been redirected from network addresses other than the specific address.
The SSPs 202, 204 and 206, and the SCP 210 may reside in a network. In one exemplary embodiment, the network may be a public switched telephone network (PSTN) utilizing an SS7 protocol. In an alternate embodiment, the network may also be a voice over internet protocol (IP) based network. The SSP and SS7 exemplary embodiment relates to an Advanced Intelligent Network (AIN). However, the system may also be implemented as a data switch or Private Branch Exchange (PBX) based feature.
The records 304 may each include an address identifier field 305 and a field for indicating the activation status of a redirect call ring feature 306. The address identifier 305 indicates a network address associated with the record. The activation status 306 indicates whether functions associated with the redirect call ring feature are to be applied to calls directed to the network address associated with the address identifier 305.
In one exemplary embodiment, the record 304 may also include one or more specified distinctive rings 308. These specified distinctive rings 308 may be specified by a user and indicate which ring out of the list of distinctive rings 312 is to be used. The distinctive ring field 308 may also associate a distinctive ring with a specific redirected number address. In one exemplary embodiment, a user may specify a specific redirect number network address 310 and associate with that specific redirect number address 310 a specific distinctive ring 308. If a call from the specified redirect number network address 310 is received, the SCP 302 may direct the use of the specific distinctive ring 308 to the receiving subscriber communications devices. In addition, the user may specify another distinctive ring for use with numbers or calls redirected from numbers other than the specified redirect number address 310.
The SCP 302 may also include logic 314. Logic 314 may comprise software, hardware, or a combination of software and hardware. Logic 314 may act to receive call termination attempt queries and may perform various functions associated with features activated for the network address to which the call attempt is being made. Also, if the redirect call ring feature is active, the logic 314 may initiate distinctive rings for redirected calls.
For example, the logic 314 may access a record 304 having address identifier 305 associated with a network address to which a call attempt is being made. The logic 314 may test the record 304 to determine if the redirect call ring feature is active. The logic 314 may determine whether the query associated with the call attempt includes a redirect network address. If the query includes a redirect network address, the logic 314 may initiate a call using the specified distinctive ring 308. In an alternate embodiment, the logic 314 may compare the redirect network address to the specified redirect number network address 310 and selectively direct the utilization of the specified distinctive ring 308 based on the value of the redirect network address.
The logic 314 of the SCP 302 may also enable user interaction to manipulate values associated with the redirect call ring feature. For example, the logic 314 may permit a user to select a specified distinctive ring 308 from the list of distinctive rings 312. In an alternate embodiment, the logic 314 may permit the user to specify the specified redirect number address 310 and associate a specific distinctive ring with that specified redirect number address 310. In various embodiments, the logic 304 may permit interaction with the records through pound sign (#) command functions, network messages, or Internet based interactions such as through email or a web page.
However, if the call is a redirected call the system may test to determine the redirected number address, as shown at step 510. This may, for example, include parsing a call request or call query. The system may test to determine if the redirected number address matches a specified redirect number address, as shown at step 512. If the redirect number address does not match a specified redirect number address, the system may direct the utilization of a distinctive ring number 2, as shown at step 516. However, if the redirect number address matches a specified network address, the system may direct the utilization of a distinctive ring number 1, as indicated by step 514.
However, if a redirect number address is present, the system may send an authorized termination response including direction to use a distinctive ring tone, as shown at step 616. This authorization termination response will result in the use of the distinctive ring when initiating the call, as shown in step 618.
In a particular embodiment, the disclosure is directed to a system for identifying redirected calls that includes a service switch point and a service control point. The service switch point is coupled to a communications network. The service switch point is configured to receive a call termination request that indicates call redirection. The service control point is coupled to the service switch point and is configured to direct the service switch point to utilize a distinctive ring in response to receiving the call termination request.
In another embodiment, the disclosure is directed to a method of call identification. The method includes receiving a call termination request, determining whether the call termination request indicates a redirected call, and selectively directing the utilization of a distinctive ring when initiating a call based on a determination as to whether the call termination request indicates a redirected call. The call termination request includes a destination address and is configured to request initiation of a call to the destination address.
In a further embodiment, the disclosure is directed to a service control point that includes computer-readable storage, a data record stored in the computer readable storage, and logic. The data record is associated with a telephone network address and is configured to indicate activation status of a redirect call ring feature. The logic is configured to access the data record in response to receiving a call termination query. The logic is configured to determine whether the call termination query indicates a redirected call. The logic is also configured to selectively direct utilization of the redirected call ring feature based on the activation status.
The above-disclosed subject matter is to be considered illustrative, and not restrictive, and the appended claims are intended to cover all such modifications, enhancements, and other embodiments which fall within the true spirit and scope of the present invention. Thus, to the maximum extent allowed by law, the scope of the present invention is to be determined by the broadest permissible interpretation of the following
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US7239690 *||Sep 5, 2003||Jul 3, 2007||Sbc Knowledge Ventures, L.P.||System and method for identifying redirected calls|
|US7450710 *||May 11, 2007||Nov 11, 2008||At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P.||System and method for identifying redirected calls|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US20090304171 *||Dec 10, 2009||At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P.||System and Method for Identifying Redirected Calls|
|U.S. Classification||379/207.16, 379/211.02, 379/211.01, 379/373.02, 379/911|
|International Classification||H04M19/04, H04M3/54, H04M3/42|
|Cooperative Classification||H04M3/02, H04M2207/12, Y10S379/911, H04M19/041, H04M3/54|
|European Classification||H04M19/04D, H04M3/02, H04M3/54|
|Oct 1, 2008||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: AT&T INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY I, L.P., NEVADA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:PEARSON, LARRY B.;TILIKS, DIANNA INARA;MOSS, JOHN WESLEY;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:021616/0689;SIGNING DATES FROM 20040126 TO 20040128
|Mar 11, 2009||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: AT&T KNOWLEDGE VENTURES, L.P., NEVADA
Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:SBC KNOWLEDGE VENTURES, L.P.;REEL/FRAME:022379/0536
Effective date: 20060224
|Feb 25, 2013||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4