|Publication number||US7606741 B2|
|Application number||US 11/097,981|
|Publication date||Oct 20, 2009|
|Filing date||Apr 1, 2005|
|Priority date||Feb 15, 2004|
|Also published as||EP1747508A2, EP1747508A4, EP1749260A2, EP1749260A4, EP1756704A2, EP1756704A4, EP1756729A2, EP1756729A4, EP1759272A2, EP1759272A4, EP1759273A2, EP1759273A4, EP1759274A2, EP1759274A4, EP1759275A2, EP1759275A4, EP1759276A2, EP1759276A4, EP1759277A2, EP1759277A4, EP1759281A2, EP1759281A4, EP1761841A2, EP1761841A4, EP1763842A2, EP1763842A4, EP1880301A2, EP1880301A4, EP2490152A1, US7421155, US7437023, US7593605, US7596269, US7599580, US7599844, US7702624, US7706611, US7707039, US7742953, US7818215, US7831912, US8005720, US8019648, US8064700, US8214387, US8447144, US8515816, US20050234851, US20060023945, US20060026078, US20060026140, US20060029296, US20060036462, US20060036585, US20060041538, US20060041590, US20060041828, US20060047639, US20060050996, US20060061806, US20060078207, US20060087683, US20060119900, US20060294094, US20070011140, US20100183246, US20110019919, US20110044547, WO2005096750A2, WO2005096750A3, WO2005096755A2, WO2005096755A3, WO2005098596A2, WO2005098596A3, WO2005098597A2, WO2005098597A3, WO2005098598A2, WO2005098598A3, WO2005098599A2, WO2005098599A3, WO2005098600A2, WO2005098600A3, WO2005098601A2, WO2005098601A3, WO2005098602A2, WO2005098602A3, WO2005098603A2, WO2005098603A3, WO2005098604A2, WO2005098604A3, WO2005098605A2, WO2005098605A3, WO2005098606A2, WO2005098606A3, WO2005098607A2, WO2005098607A3, WO2005098610A2, WO2005098610A3, WO2005114380A2, WO2005114380A3|
|Publication number||097981, 11097981, US 7606741 B2, US 7606741B2, US-B2-7606741, US7606741 B2, US7606741B2|
|Inventors||Martin T. King, James Q. Stafford-Fraser, Clifford A. Kushler, Dale L. Grover|
|Original Assignee||Exbibuo B.V.|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (112), Non-Patent Citations (99), Referenced by (159), Classifications (106), Legal Events (3)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
This application is a Continuation-In-Part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/004,637 filed on Dec. 3, 2004, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
This application is related to, and incorporates by reference in their entirety, the following U.S. Patent Applications, filed concurrently herewith: U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/097,961, entitled METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR INITIATING APPLICATION PROCESSES BY DATA CAPTURE FROM RENDERED DOCUMENTS, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/097,093, entitled DETERMINING ACTIONS INVOLVING CAPTURED INFORMATION AND ELECTRONIC CONTENT ASSOCIATED WITH RENDERED DOCUMENTS, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/098,038, entitled CONTENT ACCESS WITH HANDHELD DOCUMENT DATA CAPTURE DEVICES, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/098,014, entitled SEARCH ENGINES AND SYSTEMS WITH HANDHELD DOCUMENT DATA CAPTURE DEVICES, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/097,103, entitled TRIGGERING ACTIONS IN RESPONSE TO OPTICALLY OR ACOUSTICALLY CAPTURING KEYWORDS FROM A RENDERED DOCUMENT, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/098,043, entitled SEARCHING AND ACCESSING DOCUMENTS ON PRIVATE NETWORKS FOR USE WITH CAPTURES FROM RENDERED DOCUMENTS, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/097,089, entitled DOCUMENT ENHANCEMENT SYSTEM AND METHOD, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/097,835, entitled PUBLISHING TECHNIQUES FOR ADDING VALUE TO A RENDERED DOCUMENT, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/098,016, entitled ARCHIVE OF TEXT CAPTURES FROM RENDERED DOCUMENTS, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/097,828, entitled ADDING INFORMATION OR FUNCTIONALITY TO A RENDERED DOCUMENT VIA ASSOCIATION WITH AN ELECTRONIC COUNTERPART, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/097,833, entitled AGGREGATE ANALYSIS OF TEXT CAPTURES PERFORMED BY MULTIPLE USERS FROM RENDERED DOCUMENTS, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/097,836, entitled ESTABLISHING AN INTERACTIVE ENVIRONMENT FOR RENDERED DOCUMENTS, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/098,042, entitled DATA CAPTURE FROM RENDERED DOCUMENTS USING HANDHELD DEVICE, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/096,704, entitled CAPTURING TEXT FROM RENDERED DOCUMENTS USING SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION.
This application claims priority to, and incorporates by reference in their entirety, the following U.S. Provisional Patent Applications: Application No. 60/559,226 filed on Apr. 1, 2004, Application No. 60/558,893 filed on Apr. 1, 2004, Application No. 60/558,968 filed on Apr. 1, 2004, Application No. 60/558,867 filed on Apr. 1, 2004, Application No. 60/559,278 filed on Apr. 1, 2004, Application No. 60/559,279 filed on Apr. 1, 2004, Application No. 60/559,265 filed on Apr. 1, 2004, Application No. 60/559,277 filed on Apr. 1, 2004, Application No. 60/558,969 filed on Apr. 1, 2004, Application No. 60/558,892 filed on Apr. 1, 2004, Application No. 60/558,760 filed on Apr. 1, 2004, Application No. 60/558,717 filed on Apr. 1, 2004, Application No. 60/558,499 filed on Apr. 1, 2004, Application No. 60/558,370 filed on Apr. 1, 2004, Application No. 60/558,789 filed on Apr. 1, 2004, Application No. 60/558,791 filed on Apr. 1, 2004, Application No. 60/558,527 filed on Apr. 1, 2004, Application No. 60/559,125 filed on Apr. 2, 2004, Application No. 60/558,909 filed on Apr. 2, 2004, Application No. 60/559,033 filed on Apr. 2, 2004, Application No. 60/559,127 filed on Apr. 2, 2004, Application No. 60/559,087 filed on Apr. 2, 2004, Application No. 60/559,131 filed on Apr. 2, 2004, Application No. 60/559,766 filed on Apr. 6, 2004, Application No. 60/561,768 filed on Apr. 12, 2004, Application No. 60/563,520 filed on Apr. 19, 2004, Application No. 60/563,485 filed on Apr. 19, 2004, Application No. 60/564,688 filed on Apr. 23, 2004, Application No. 60/564,846 filed on Apr. 23, 2004, Application No. 60/566,667, on Apr. 30, 2004, Application No. 60/571,381 filed on May 14, 2004, Application No. 60/571,560 filed on May 14, 2004, Application No. 60/571,715 filed on May 17, 2004, Application No. 60/589,203 filed on Jul. 19, 2004, Application No. 60/589,201 filed on Jul. 19, 2004, Application No. 60/589,202 filed on Jul. 19, 2004, Application No. 60/598,821 filed on Aug. 2, 2004, Application No. 60/602,956 filed on Aug. 18, 2004, Application No. 60/602,925 filed on Aug. 18, 2004, Application No. 60/602,947 filed on Aug. 18, 2004, Application No. 60/602,897 filed on Aug. 18, 2004, Application No. 60/602,896 filed on Aug. 18, 2004, Application No. 60/602,930 filed on Aug. 18, 2004, Application No. 60/602,898 filed on Aug. 18, 2004, Application No. 60/603,466 filed on Aug. 19, 2004, Application No. 60/603,082 filed on Aug. 19, 2004, Application No. 60/603,081 filed on Aug. 19, 2004, Application No. 60/603,498 filed on Aug. 20, 2004, Application No. 60/603,358 filed on Aug. 20, 2004, Application No. 60/604,103 filed on Aug. 23, 2004, Application No. 60/604,098 filed on Aug. 23, 2004, Application No. 60/604,100 filed on Aug. 23, 2004, Application No. 60/604,102 filed on Aug. 23, 2004, Application No. 60/605,229 filed on Aug. 27, 2004, Application No. 60/605,105 filed on Aug. 27, 2004, Application No. 60/613,243 filed on Sep. 27, 2004, Application No. 60/613,628 filed on Sep. 27, 2004, Application No. 60/613,632 filed on Sep. 27, 2004, Application No. 60/613,589 filed on Sep. 27, 2004, Application No. 60/613,242 filed on Sep. 27, 2004, Application No. 60/613,602 filed on Sep. 27, 2004, Application No. 60/613,340 filed on Sep. 27, 2004, Application No. 60/613,634 filed on Sep. 27, 2004, Application No. 60/613,461 filed on Sep. 27, 2004, Application No. 60/613,455 filed on Sep. 27, 2004, Application No. 60/613,460 filed on Sep. 27, 2004, Application No. 60/613,400 filed on Sep. 27, 2004, Application No. 60/613,456 filed on Sep. 27, 2004, Application No. 60/613,341 filed on Sep. 27, 2004, Application No. 60/613,361 filed on Sep. 27, 2004, Application No. 60/613,454 filed on Sep. 27, 2004, Application No. 60/613,339 filed on Sep. 27, 2004, Application No. 60/613,633 filed on Sep. 27, 2004, Application No. 60/615,378 filed on Oct. 1, 2004, Application No. 60/615,112 filed on Oct. 1, 2004, Application No. 60/615,538 filed on Oct. 1, 2004, Application No. 60/617,122 filed on Oct. 7, 2004, Application No. 60/622,906 filed on Oct. 28, 2004, Application No. 60/633,452 filed on Dec. 6, 2004, Application No. 60/633,678 filed on Dec. 6, 2004, Application No. 60/633,486 filed on Dec. 6, 2004, Application No. 60/633,453 filed on Dec. 6, 2004, Application No. 60/634,627 filed on Dec. 9, 2004, Application No. 60/634,739 filed on Dec. 9, 2004, Application No. 60/647,684 filed on Jan. 26, 2005, Application No. 60/648,746 filed on Jan. 31, 2005, Application No. 60/653,372 filed on Feb. 15, 2005, Application No. 60/653,663 filed on Feb. 16, 2005, Application No. 60/653,669 filed on Feb. 16, 2005, Application No. 60/653,899 filed on Feb. 16, 2005, Application No. 60/653,679 filed on Feb. 16, 2005, Application No. 60/653,847 filed on Feb. 16, 2005, Application No. 60/654,379 filed on Feb. 17, 2005, Application No. 60/654,368 filed on Feb. 18, 2005, Application No. 60/654,326 filed on Feb. 18, 2005, Application No. 60/654,196 filed on Feb. 18, 2005, Application No. 60/655,279 filed on Feb. 22, 2005, Application No. 60/655,280 filed on Feb. 22, 2005, Application No. 60/655,987 filed on Feb. 22, 2005, Application No. 60/655,697 filed on Feb. 22, 2005, Application No. 60/655,281 filed on Feb. 22, 2005, and Application No. 60/657,309 filed on Feb. 28, 2005.
The described technology is directed to the field of document processing. The present invention relates to the field of electronic data/information processing. More specifically, the present invention relates to methods and apparatuses for initiating ordering items using a graphical capture device.
Paper documents have an enduring appeal, as can be seen by the proliferation of paper documents in the computer age. It has never been easier to print and publish paper documents than it is today. Paper documents prevail even though electronic documents are easier to duplicate, transmit, search and edit.
Given the popularity of paper documents and the advantages of electronic documents, it would be useful to combine the benefits of both.
In this description, reference is made to the accompanying drawings that form a part hereof wherein like numerals designate like parts throughout, and in which are shown, by way of illustration, specific embodiments in which the invention may be practiced. It is to be understood that other embodiments may be utilized and structural or logical changes may be made without departing from the scope of the present invention. Therefore, the following detailed description is not to be taken in a limiting sense, and the scope of the present invention is defined by the appended claims and their equivalents.
Various embodiments include a user-friendly technique for filling forms (such as forms on paper, in catalogs, displayed on web pages, other dynamic displays, in advertisements, in books, in magazines, on signs and the like) using a graphical capture device (such as a scanner, digital camera, or other device capable of capturing at least a portion of the rendered form) or other devices. Embodiments may be practiced to engage in many forms of information gathering utilizing a device to interface with human and machine-readable materials.
In this description, various aspects of selected embodiments are described. However, it will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art and others that alternate embodiments may be practiced with only some or all of the aspects. For purposes of explanation, specific numbers, materials and configurations are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the embodiments. However, it will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art and others that alternate embodiments may be practiced without the specific details. In other instances, well-known features are omitted or simplified in order not to obscure the illustrated embodiments.
Various operations may be described herein as multiple discreet steps in turn, in a manner that is helpful to understanding of the embodiments. However, the order of description should not be construed to imply that these operations are necessarily order dependent. In particular, these operations may not be performed in the order of presentation.
The phrase “in one embodiment” is used repeatedly. The phrase generally does not refer to the same embodiment, however, it may. The terms “comprising,” “having” and “including” are synonymous, unless the context dictates otherwise.
1. Nature of the System
For every paper document that has an electronic counterpart, there exists a discrete amount of information in the paper document that can identify the electronic counterpart. In some embodiments, the system uses a sample of text captured from a paper document, for example using a handheld scanner, to identify and locate an electronic counterpart of the document. In most cases, the amount of text needed by the facility is very small in that a few words of text from a document can often function as an identifier for the paper document and as a link to its electronic counterpart. In addition, the system may use those few words to identify not only the document, but also a location within the document.
Thus, paper documents and their digital counterparts can be associated in many useful ways using the system discussed herein.
1.1. A Quick Overview of the Future
Once the system has associated a piece of text in a paper document with a particular digital entity has been established, the system is able to build a huge amount of functionality on that association.
It is increasingly the case that most paper documents have an electronic counterpart that is accessible on the World Wide Web or from some other online database or document corpus, or can be made accessible, such as in response to the payment of a fee or subscription. At the simplest level, then, when a user scans a few words in a paper document, the system can retrieve that electronic document or some part of it, or display it, email it to somebody, purchase it, print it or post it to a web page. As additional examples, scanning a few words of a book that a person is reading over breakfast could cause the audio-book version in the person's car to begin reading from that point when s/he starts driving to work, or scanning the serial number on a printer cartridge could begin the process of ordering a replacement.
The system implements these and many other examples of “paper/digital integration” without requiring changes to the current processes of writing, printing and publishing documents, giving such conventional rendered documents a whole new layer of digital functionality.
A typical use of the system begins with using an optical scanner to scan text from a paper document, but it is important to note that other methods of capture from other types of document are equally applicable. The system is therefore sometimes described as scanning or capturing text from a rendered document, where those terms are defined as follows:
A rendered document is a printed document or a document shown on a display or monitor. It is a document that is perceptible to a human, whether in permanent form or on a transitory display.
Scanning or capturing is the process of systematic examination to obtain information from a rendered document. The process may involve optical capture using a scanner or camera (for example a camera in a cellphone), or it may involve reading aloud from the document into an audio capture device or typing it on a keypad or keyboard. For more examples, see Section 15.
2. Introduction to the System
This section describes some of the devices, processes and systems that constitute a system for paper/digital integration. In various embodiments, the system builds a wide variety of services and applications on this underlying core that provides the basic functionality.
2.1. The Processes
Text from a rendered document is captured 100, typically in optical form by an optical scanner or audio form by a voice recorder, and this image or sound data is then processed 102, for example to remove artifacts of the capture process or to improve the signal-to-noise ratio. A recognition process 104 such as OCR, speech recognition, or autocorrelation then converts the data into a signature, comprised in some embodiments of text, text offsets, or other symbols. Alternatively, the system performs an alternate form of extracting document signature from the rendered document. The signature represents a set of possible text transcriptions in some embodiments. This process may be influenced by feedback from other stages, for example, if the search process and context analysis 110 have identified some candidate documents from which the capture may originate, thus narrowing the possible interpretations of the original capture.
A post-processing 106 stage may take the output of the recognition process and filter it or perform such other operations upon it as may be useful. Depending upon the embodiment implemented, it may be possible at this stage to deduce some direct actions 107 to be taken immediately without reference to the later stages, such as where a phrase or symbol has been captured which contains sufficient information in itself to convey the user's intent. In these cases no digital counterpart document need be referenced, or even known to the system.
Typically, however, the next stage will be to construct a query 108 or a set of queries for use in searching. Some aspects of the query construction may depend on the search process used and so cannot be performed until the next stage, but there will typically be some operations, such as the removal of obviously misrecognized or irrelevant characters, which can be performed in advance.
The query or queries are then passed to the search and context analysis stage 110. Here, the system optionally attempts to identify the document from which the original data was captured. To do so, the system typically uses search indices and search engines 112, knowledge about the user 114 and knowledge about the user's context or the context in which the capture occurred 116. Search engine 112 may employ and/or index information specifically about rendered documents, about their digital counterpart documents, and about documents that have a web (internet) presence). It may write to, as well as read from, many of these sources and, as has been mentioned, it may feed information into other stages of the process, for example by giving the recognition system 104 information about the language, font, rendering and likely next words based on its knowledge of the candidate documents.
In some circumstances the next stage will be to retrieve 120 a copy of the document or documents that have been identified. The sources of the documents 124 may be directly accessible, for example from a local filing system or database or a web server, or they may need to be contacted via some access service 122 which might enforce authentication, security or payment or may provide other services such as conversion of the document into a desired format.
Applications of the system may take advantage of the association of extra functionality or data with part or all of a document. For example, advertising applications discussed in Section 10.4 may use an association of particular advertising messages or subjects with portions of a document. This extra associated functionality or data can be thought of as one or more overlays on the document, and is referred to herein as “markup.” The next stage of the process 130, then, is to identify any markup relevant to the captured data. Such markup may be provided by the user, the originator, or publisher of the document, or some other party, and may be directly accessible from some source 132 or may be generated by some service 134. In various embodiments, markup can be associated with, and apply to, a rendered document and/or the digital counterpart to a rendered document, or to groups of either or both of these documents.
Lastly, as a result of the earlier stages, some actions may be taken 140. These may be default actions such as simply recording the information found, they may be dependent on the data or document, or they may be derived from the markup analysis. Sometimes the action will simply be to pass the data to another system. In some cases the various possible actions appropriate to a capture at a specific point in a rendered document will be presented to the user as a menu on an associated display, for example on a local display 332, on a computer display 212 or a mobile phone or PDA display 216. If the user doesn't respond to the menu, the default actions can be taken.
2.2. The Components
Computer 212 may include a memory containing computer executable instructions for processing an order from scanning devices 202 and 204. As an example, an order can include an identifier (such as a serial number of the scanning device 202/204 or an identifier that partially or uniquely identifies the user of the scanner), scanning context information (e.g., time of scan, location of scan, etc.) and/or scanned information (such as a text string) that is used to uniquely identify the document being scanned. In alternative embodiments, the operating environment may include more or less components.
Also available on the network 220 are search engines 232, document sources 234, user account services 236, markup services 238 and other network services 239. The network 220 may be a corporate intranet, the public Internet, a mobile phone network or some other network, or any interconnection of the above.
Regardless of the manner by which the devices are coupled to each other, they may all may be operable in accordance with well-known commercial transaction and communication protocols (e.g., Internet Protocol (IP)). In various embodiments, the functions and capabilities of scanning device 202, computer 212, and mobile station 216 may be wholly or partially integrated into one device. Thus, the terms scanning device, computer, and mobile station can refer to the same device depending upon whether the device incorporates functions or capabilities of the scanning device 202, computer 212 and mobile station 216. In addition, some or all of the functions of the search engines 232, document sources 234, user account services 236, markup services 238 and other network services 239 may be implemented on any of the devices and/or other devices not shown.
2.3. The Capture Device
As described above, the capture device may capture text using an optical scanner that captures image data from the rendered document, or using an audio recording device that captures a user's spoken reading of the text, or other methods. Some embodiments of the capture device may also capture images, graphical symbols and icons, etc., including machine readable codes such as barcodes. The device may be exceedingly simple, consisting of little more than the transducer, some storage, and a data interface, relying on other functionality residing elsewhere in the system, or it may be a more full-featured device. For illustration, this section describes a device based around an optical scanner and with a reasonable number of features.
Scanners are well known devices that capture and digitize images. An offshoot of the photocopier industry, the first scanners were relatively large devices that captured an entire document page at once. Recently, portable optical scanners have been introduced in convenient form factors, such as a pen-shaped handheld device.
In some embodiments, the portable scanner is used to scan text, graphics, or symbols from rendered documents. The portable scanner has a scanning element that captures text, symbols, graphics, etc, from rendered documents. In addition to documents that have been printed on paper, in some embodiments, rendered documents include documents that have been displayed on a screen such as a CRT monitor or LCD display.
A microphone 310 and associated circuitry convert the sound of the environment (including spoken words) into machine-compatible signals, and other input facilities exist in the form of buttons, scroll-wheels or other tactile sensors such as touch-pads 314.
Feedback to the user is possible through a visual display or indicator lights 332, through a loudspeaker or other audio transducer 334 and through a vibrate module 336.
The scanner 302 comprises logic 326 to interact with the various other components, possibly processing the received signals into different formats and/or interpretations. Logic 326 may be operable to read and write data and program instructions stored in associated storage 330 such as RAM, ROM, flash, or other suitable memory. It may read a time signal from the clock unit 328. The scanner 302 also includes an interface 316 to communicate scanned information and other signals to a network and/or an associated computing device. In some embodiments, the scanner 302 may have an on-board power supply 332. In other embodiments, the scanner 302 may be powered from a tethered connection to another device, such as a Universal Serial Bus (USB) connection.
As an example of one use of scanner 302, a reader may scan some text from a newspaper article with scanner 302. The text is scanned as a bit-mapped image via the scanning head 308. Logic 326 causes the bit-mapped image to be stored in memory 330 with an associated time-stamp read from the clock unit 328. Logic 326 may also perform optical character recognition (OCR) or other post-scan processing on the bit-mapped image to convert it to text. Logic 326 may optionally extract a signature from the image, for example by performing a convolution-like process to locate repeating occurrences of characters, symbols or objects, and determine the distance or number of other characters, symbols, or objects between these repeated elements. The reader may then upload the bit-mapped image (or text or other signature, if post-scan processing has been performed by logic 326) to an associated computer via interface 316.
As an example of another use of scanner 302, a reader may capture some text from an article as an audio file by using microphone 310 as an acoustic capture port. Logic 326 causes audio file to be stored in memory 328. Logic 326 may also perform voice recognition or other post-scan processing on the audio file to convert it to text. As above, the reader may then upload the audio file (or text produced by post-scan processing performed by logic 326) to an associated computer via interface 316.
As paper-digital integration becomes more common, there are many aspects of existing technologies that can be changed to take better advantage of this integration, or to enable it to be implemented more effectively. This section highlights some of those issues.
Searching a corpus of documents, even so large a corpus as the World Wide Web, has become commonplace for ordinary users, who use a keyboard to construct a search query which is sent to a search engine. This section and the next discuss the aspects of both the construction of a query originated by a capture from a rendered document, and the search engine that handles such a query.
3.1. Scan/Speak/Type as Search Query
Use of the described system typically starts with a few words being captured from a rendered document using any of several methods, including those mentioned in Section 1.2 above. Where the input needs some interpretation to convert it to text, for example in the case of OCR or speech input, there may be end-to-end feedback in the system so that the document corpus can be used to enhance the recognition process. End-to-end feedback can be applied by performing an approximation of the recognition or interpretation, identifying a set of one or more candidate matching documents, and then using information from the possible matches in the candidate documents to further refine or restrict the recognition or interpretation. Candidate documents can be weighted according to their probable relevance (for example, based on then number of other users who have scanned in these documents, or their popularity on the Internet), and these weights can be applied in this iterative recognition process.
3.2. Short Phrase Searching
Because the selective power of a search query based on a few words is greatly enhanced when the relative positions of these words are known, only a small amount of text need be captured for the system to identify the text's location in a corpus. Most commonly, the input text will be a contiguous sequence of words, such as a short phrase.
3.2.1. Finding Document and Location in Document from Short Capture
In addition to locating the document from which a phrase originates, the system can identify the location in that document and can take action based on this knowledge.
3.2.2. Other Methods of Finding Location
The system may also employ other methods of discovering the document and location, such as by using watermarks or other special markings on the rendered document.
3.3. Incorporation of Other Factors in Search Query
In addition to the captured text, other factors (i.e., information about user identity, profile, and context) may form part of the search query, such as the time of the capture, the identity and geographical location of the user, knowledge of the user's habits and recent activities, etc.
The document identity and other information related to previous captures, especially if they were quite recent, may form part of a search query.
The identity of the user may be determined from a unique identifier associated with a capturing device, and/or biometric or other supplemental information (speech patterns, fingerprints, etc.).
3.4. Knowledge of Nature of Unreliability in Search Query (OCR Errors etc)
The search query can be constructed taking into account the types of errors likely to occur in the particular capture method used. One example of this is an indication of suspected errors in the recognition of specific characters; in this instance a search engine may treat these characters as wildcards, or assign them a lower priority.
3.5. Local Caching of Index for Performance/offline Use
Sometimes the capturing device may not be in communication with the search engine or corpus at the time of the data capture. For this reason, information helpful to the offline use of the device may be downloaded to the device in advance, or to some entity with which the device can communicate. In some cases, all or a substantial part of an index associated with a corpus may be downloaded. This topic is discussed further in Section 15.3.
3.6. Queries, in Whatever Form, may be Recorded and Acted on Later
If there are likely to be delays or cost associated with communicating a query or receiving the results, this pre-loaded information can improve the performance of the local device, reduce communication costs, and provide helpful and timely user feedback.
In the situation where no communication is available (the local device is “offline”), the queries may be saved and transmitted to the rest of the system at such a time as communication is restored.
In these cases it may be important to transmit a timestamp with each query. The time of the capture can be a significant factor in the interpretation of the query. For example, Section 13.1 discusses the importance of the time of capture in relation to earlier captures. It is important to note that the time of capture will not always be the same as the time that the query is executed.
3.7. Parallel Searching
For performance reasons, multiple queries may be launched in response to a single capture, either in sequence or in parallel. Several queries may be sent in response to a single capture, for example as new words are added to the capture, or to query multiple search engines in parallel.
For example, in some embodiments, the system sends queries to a special index for the current document, to a search engine on a local machine, to a search engine on the corporate network, and to remote search engines on the Internet.
The results of particular searches may be given higher priority than those from others.
The response to a given query may indicate that other pending queries are superfluous; these may be cancelled before completion.
4. Paper and Search Engines
Often it is desirable for a search engine that handles traditional online queries also to handle those originating from rendered documents. Conventional search engines may be enhanced or modified in a number of ways to make them more suitable for use with the described system.
The search engine and/or other components of the system may create and maintain indices that have different or extra features. The system may modify an incoming paper-originated query or change the way the query is handled in the resulting search, thus distinguishing these paper-originated queries from those coming from queries typed into web browsers and other sources. And the system may take different actions or offer different options when the results are returned by the searches originated from paper as compared to those from other sources. Each of these approaches is discussed below.
Often, the same index can be searched using either paper-originated or traditional queries, but the index may be enhanced for use in the current system in a variety of ways.
4.1.1. Knowledge About the Paper Form
Extra fields can be added to such an index that will help in the case of a paper-based search.
Index Entry Indicating Document Availability in Paper Form
The first example is a field indicating that the document is known to exist or be distributed in paper form. The system may give such documents higher priority if the query comes from paper.
Knowledge of Popularity Paper Form
In this example statistical data concerning the popularity of paper documents (and, optionally, concerning sub-regions within these documents)—for example the amount of scanning activity, circulation numbers provided by the publisher or other sources, etc—is used to give such documents higher priority, to boost the priority of digital counterpart documents (for example, for browser-based queries or web searches), etc.
Knowledge of Rendered Format
Another important example may be recording information about the layout of a specific rendering of a document.
For a particular edition of a book, for example, the index may include information about where the line breaks and page breaks occur, which fonts were used, any unusual capitalization.
The index may also include information about the proximity of other items on the page, such as images, text boxes, tables and advertisements.
Use of Semantic Information in Original
Lastly, semantic information that can be deduced from the source markup but is not apparent in the paper document, such as the fact that a particular piece of text refers to an item offered for sale, or that a certain paragraph contains program code, may also be recorded in the index.
4.1.2. Indexing in the Knowledge of the Capture Method
A second factor that may modify the nature of the index is the knowledge of the type of capture likely to be used. A search initiated by an optical scan may benefit if the index takes into account characters that are easily confused in the OCR process, or includes some knowledge of the fonts used in the document. Similarly, if the query is from speech recognition, an index based on similar-sounding phonemes may be much more efficiently searched. An additional factor that may affect the use of the index in the described model is the importance of iterative feedback during the recognition process. If the search engine is able to provide feedback from the index as the text is being captured, it can greatly increase the accuracy of the capture.
Indexing Using Offsets
If the index is likely to be searched using the offset-based/autocorrelation OCR methods described in Section 9, in some embodiments, the system stores the appropriate offset or signature information in an index.
4.1.3. Multiple Indices
Lastly, in the described system, it may be common to conduct searches on many indices. Indices may be maintained on several machines on a corporate network. Partial indices may be downloaded to the capture device, or to a machine close to the capture device. Separate indices may be created for users or groups of users with particular interests, habits or permissions. An index may exist for each filesystem, each directory, even each file on a user's hard disk. Indexes are published and subscribed to by users and by systems. It will be important, then, to construct indices that can be distributed, updated, merged and separated efficiently.
4.2. Handling the Queries
4.2.1. Knowing the Capture is from Paper
A search engine may take different actions when it recognizes that a search query originated from a paper document. The engine might handle the query in a way that is more tolerant to the types of errors likely to appear in certain capture methods, for example.
It may be able to deduce this from some indicator included in the query (for example a flag indicating the nature of the capture), or it may deduce this from the query itself (for example, it may recognize errors or uncertainties typical of the OCR process).
Alternatively, queries from a capture device can reach the engine by a different channel or port or type of connection than those from other sources, and can be distinguished in that way. For example, some embodiments of the system will route queries to the search engine by way of a dedicated gateway. Thus, the search engine knows that all queries passing through the dedicated gateway were originated from a paper document.
4.2.2. Use of Context
Section 13 below describes a variety of different factors which are external to the captured text itself, yet which can be a significant aid in identifying a document. These include such things as the history of recent scans, the longer-term reading habits of a particular user, the geographic location of a user and the user's recent use of particular electronic documents. Such factors are referred to herein as “context.”
Some of the context may be handled by the search engine itself, and be reflected in the search results. For example, the search engine may keep track of a user's scanning history, and may also cross-reference this scanning history to conventional keyboard-based queries. In such cases, the search engine maintains and uses more state information about each individual user than do most conventional search engines, and each interaction with a search engine may be considered to extend over several searches and a longer period of time than is typical today.
Some of the context may be transmitted to the search engine in the search query (Section 3.3), and may possibly be stored at the engine so as to play a part in future queries. Lastly, some of the context will best be handled elsewhere, and so becomes a filter or secondary search applied to the results from the search engine.
Data-stream Input to Search
An important input into the search process is the broader context of how the community of users is interacting with the rendered version of the document—for example, which documents are most widely read and by whom. There are analogies with a web search returning the pages that are most frequently linked to, or those that are most frequently selected from past search results. For further discussion of this topic, see Sections 13.4 and 14.2.
4.2.3. Document Sub-regions
The described system can emit and use not only information about documents as a whole, but also information about sub-regions of documents, even down to individual words. Many existing search engines concentrate simply on locating a document or file that is relevant to a particular query. Those that can work on a finer grain and identify a location within a document will provide a significant benefit for the described system.
4.3. Returning the Results
The search engine may use some of the further information it now maintains to affect the results returned.
The system may also return certain documents to which the user has access only as a result of being in possession of the paper copy (Section 7.4).
The search engine may also offer new actions or options appropriate to the described system, beyond simple retrieval of the text.
5. Markup, Annotations and Metadata
In addition to performing the capture-search-retrieve process, the described system also associates extra functionality with a document, and in particular with specific locations or segments of text within a document. This extra functionality is often, though not exclusively, associated with the rendered document by being associated with its electronic counterpart. As an example, hyperlinks in a web page could have the same functionality when a printout of that web page is scanned. In some cases, the functionality is not defined in the electronic document, but is stored or generated elsewhere.
This layer of added functionality is referred to herein as “markup.”
5.1. Overlays, Static and Dynamic
One way to think of the markup is as an “overlay” on the document, which provides further information about—and may specify actions associated with—the document or some portion of it. The markup may include human-readable content, but is often invisible to a user and/or intended for machine use. Examples include options to be displayed in a popup-menu on a nearby display when a user captures text from a particular area in a rendered document, or audio samples that illustrate the pronunciation of a particular phrase.
5.1.1. Several Layers, Possibly from Several Sources
Any document may have multiple overlays simultaneously, and these may be sourced from a variety of locations. Markup data may be created or supplied by the author of the document, or by the user, or by some other party.
Markup data may be attached to the electronic document or embedded in it. It may be found in a conventional location (for example, in the same place as the document but with a different filename suffix). Markup data may be included in the search results of the query that located the original document, or may be found by a separate query to the same or another search engine. Markup data may be found using the original captured text and other capture information or contextual information, or it may be found using already-deduced information about the document and location of the capture. Markup data may be found in a location specified in the document, even if the markup itself is not included in the document.
The markup may be largely static and specific to the document, similar to the way links on a traditional html web page are often embedded as static data within the html document, but markup may also be dynamically generated and/or applied to a large number of documents. An example of dynamic markup is information attached to a document that includes the up-to-date share price of companies mentioned in that document. An example of broadly applied markup is translation information that is automatically available on multiple documents or sections of documents in a particular language.
5.1.2. Personal “Plug-in” Layers
Users may also install, or subscribe to particular sources of, markup data, thus personalizing the system's response to particular captures.
5.2. Keywords and Phrases, Trademarks and Logos
Some elements in documents may have particular “markup” or functionality associated with them based on their own characteristics rather than their location in a particular document. Examples include special marks that are printed in the document purely for the purpose of being scanned, as well as logos and trademarks that can link the user to further information about the organization concerned. The same applies to “keywords” or “key phrases” in the text. Organizations might register particular phrases with which they are associated, or with which they would like to be associated, and attach certain markup to them that would be available wherever that phrase was scanned.
Any word, phrase, etc. may have associated markup. For example, the system may add certain items to a pop-up menu (e.g., a link to an online bookstore) whenever the user captures the word “book,” or the title of a book, or a topic related to books. In some embodiments, of the system, digital counterpart documents or indices are consulted to determine whether a capture occurred near the word “book,” or the title of a book, or a topic related to books—and the system behavior is modified in accordance with this proximity to keyword elements. In the preceding example, note that markup enables data captured from non-commercial text or documents to trigger a commercial transaction.
5.3. User-supplied Content
5.3.1. User Comments and Annotations, Including Multimedia
Annotations are another type of electronic information that may be associated with a document. For example, a user can attach an audio file of his/her thoughts about a particular document for later retrieval as voice annotations. As another example of a multimedia annotation, a user may attach photographs of places referred to in the document. The user generally supplies annotations for the document but the system can associate annotations from other sources (for example, other users in a work group may share annotations).
5.3.2. Notes from Proof-reading
An important example of user-sourced markup is the annotation of paper documents as part of a proofreading, editing or reviewing process.
5.4. Third-party Content
As mentioned earlier, markup data may often be supplied by third parties, such as by other readers of the document. Online discussions and reviews are a good example, as are community-managed information relating to particular works, volunteer-contributed translations and explanations.
Another example of third-party markup is that provided by advertisers.
5.5. Dynamic Markup Based on Other Users' Data Streams
By analyzing the data captured from documents by several or all users of the system, markup can be generated based on the activities and interests of a community. An example might be an online bookstore that creates markup or annotations that tell the user, in effect, “People who enjoyed this book also enjoyed . . . ” The markup may be less anonymous, and may tell the user which of the people in his/her contact list have also read this document recently. Other examples of datastream analysis are included in Section 14.
5.6. Markup Based on External Events and Data Sources
Markup will often be based on external events and data sources, such as input from a corporate database, information from the public Internet, or statistics gathered by the local operating system.
Data sources may also be more local, and in particular may provide information about the user's context—his/her identity, location and activities. For example, the system might communicate with the user's mobile phone and offer a markup layer that gives the user the option to send a document to somebody that the user has recently spoken to on the phone.
6. Authentication, Personalization and Security
In many situations, the identity of the user will be known. Sometimes this will be an “anonymous identity,” where the user is identified only by the serial number of the capture device, for example. Typically, however, it is expected that the system will have a much more detailed knowledge of the user, which can be used for personalizing the system and to allow activities and transactions to be performed in the user's name.
6.1. User History and “Life Library”
One of the simplest and yet most useful functions that the system can perform is to keep a record for a user of the text that s/he has captured and any further information related to that capture, including the details of any documents found, the location within that document and any actions taken as a result.
This stored history is beneficial for both the user and the system.
6.1.1. For the User
The user can be presented with a “Life Library,” a record of everything s/he has read and captured. This may be simply for personal interest, but may be used, for example, in a library by an academic who is gathering material for the bibliography of his next paper.
In some circumstances, the user may wish to make the library public, such as by publishing it on the web in a similar manner to a weblog, so that others may see what s/he is reading and finds of interest.
Lastly, in situations where the user captures some text and the system cannot immediately act upon the capture (for example, because an electronic version of the document is not yet available) the capture can be stored in the library and can be processed later, either automatically or in response to a user request. A user can also subscribe to new markup services and apply them to previously captured scans.
6.1.2. For the System
A record of a user's past captures is also useful for the system. Many aspects of the system operation can be enhanced by knowing the user's reading habits and history. The simplest example is that any scan made by a user is more likely to come from a document that the user has scanned in the recent past, and in particular if the previous scan was within the last few minutes it is very likely to be from the same document. Similarly, it is more likely that a document is being read in start-to-finish order. Thus, for English documents, it is also more likely that later scans will occur farther down in the document. Such factors can help the system establish the location of the capture in cases of ambiguity, and can also reduce the amount of text that needs to be captured.
6.2. Scanner as Payment, Identity and Authentication Device
Because the capture process generally begins with a device of some sort, typically an optical scanner or voice recorder, this device may be used as a key that identifies the user and authorizes certain actions.
6.2.1. Associate Scanner with Phone or Other Account
The device may be embedded in a mobile phone or in some other way associated with a mobile phone account. For example, a scanner may be associated with a mobile phone account by inserting a SIM card associated with the account into the scanner. Similarly, the device may be embedded in a credit card or other payment card, or have the facility for such a card to be connected to it. The device may therefore be used as a payment token, and financial transactions may be initiated by the capture from the rendered document.
6.2.2. Using Scanner Input for Authentication
The scanner may also be associated with a particular user or account through the process of scanning some token, symbol or text associated with that user or account. In addition, scanner may be used for biometric identification, for example by scanning the fingerprint of the user. In the case of an audio-based capture device, the system may identify the user by matching the voice pattern of the user or by requiring the user to speak a certain password or phrase.
For example, where a user scans a quote from a book and is offered the option to buy the book from an online retailer, the user can select this option, and is then prompted to scan his/her fingerprint to confirm the transaction.
See also Sections 15.5 and 15.6.
6.2.3. Secure Scanning Device
When the capture device is used to identify and authenticate the user, and to initiate transactions on behalf of the user, it is important that communications between the device and other parts of the system are secure. It is also important to guard against such situations as another device impersonating a scanner, and so-called “man in the middle” attacks where communications between the device and other components are intercepted.
Techniques for providing such security are well understood in the art; in various embodiments, the hardware and software in the device and elsewhere in the system are configured to implement such techniques.
7. Publishing Models and Elements
An advantage of the described system is that there is no need to alter the traditional processes of creating, printing or publishing documents in order to gain many of the system's benefits. There are reasons, though, that the creators or publishers of a document—hereafter simply referred to as the “publishers”—may wish to create functionality to support the described system.
This section is primarily concerned with the published documents themselves. For information about other related commercial transactions, such as advertising, see Section 10 entitled “P-Commerce.”
7.1. Electronic Companions to Printed Documents
The system allows for printed documents to have an associated electronic presence. Conventionally publishers often ship a CD-ROM with a book that contains further digital information, tutorial movies and other multimedia data, sample code or documents, or further reference materials. In addition, some publishers maintain web sites associated with particular publications which provide such materials, as well as information which may be updated after the time of publishing, such as errata, further comments, updated reference materials, bibliographies and further sources of relevant data, and translations into other languages. Online forums allow readers to contribute their comments about the publication.
The described system allows such materials to be much more closely tied to the rendered document than ever before, and allows the discovery of and interaction with them to be much easier for the user. By capturing a portion of text from the document, the system can automatically connect the user to digital materials associated with the document, and more particularly associated with that specific part of the document. Similarly, the user can be connected to online communities that discuss that section of the text, or to annotations and commentaries by other readers. In the past, such information would typically need to be found by searching for a particular page number or chapter.
An example application of this is in the area of academic textbooks (Section 17.5).
7.2. “Subscriptions” to Printed Documents
Some publishers may have mailing lists to which readers can subscribe if they wish to be notified of new relevant matter or when a new edition of the book is published. With the described system, the user can register an interest in particular documents or parts of documents more easily, in some cases even before the publisher has considered providing any such functionality. The reader's interest can be fed to the publisher, possibly affecting their decision about when and where to provide updates, further information, new editions or even completely new publications on topics that have proved to be of interest in existing books.
7.3. Printed Marks with Special Meaning or Containing Special Data
Many aspects of the system are enabled simply through the use of the text already existing in a document. If the document is produced in the knowledge that it may be used in conjunction with the system, however, extra functionality can be added by printing extra information in the form of special marks, which may be used to identify the text or a required action more closely, or otherwise enhance the document's interaction with the system. The simplest and most important example is an indication to the reader that the document is definitely accessible through the system. A special icon might be used, for example, to indicate that this document has an online discussion forum associated with it.
Such symbols may be intended purely for the reader, or they may be recognized by the system when scanned and used to initiate some action. Sufficient data may be encoded in the symbol to identify more than just the symbol: it may also store information, for example about the document, edition, and location of the symbol, which could be recognized and read by the system.
7.4. Authorization through Possession of the Paper Document
There are some situations where possession of or access to the printed document would entitle the user to certain privileges, for example, the access to an electronic copy of the document or to additional materials. With the described system, such privileges could be granted simply as a result of the user capturing portions of text from the document, or scanning specially printed symbols. In cases where the system needed to ensure that the user was in possession of the entire document, it might prompt the user to scan particular items or phrases from particular pages, e.g. “the second line of page 46.”
7.5. Documents which Expire
If the printed document is a gateway to extra materials and functionality, access to such features can also be time-limited. After the expiry date, a user may be required to pay a fee or obtain a newer version of the document to access the features again. The paper document will, of course, still be usable, but will lose some of its enhanced electronic functionality. This may be desirable, for example, because there is profit for the publisher in receiving fees for access to electronic materials, or in requiring the user to purchase new editions from time to time, or because there are disadvantages associated with outdated versions of the printed document remaining in circulation. Coupons are an example of a type of commercial document that can have an expiration date.
7.6. Popularity Analysis and Publishing Decisions
Section 10.5 discusses the use of the system's statistics to influence compensation of authors and pricing of advertisements.
In some embodiments, the system deduces the popularity of a publication from the activity in the electronic community associated with it as well as from the use of the paper document. These factors may help publishers to make decisions about what they will publish in future. If a chapter in an existing book, for example, turns out to be exceedingly popular, it may be worth expanding into a separate publication.
8. Document Access Services
An important aspect of the described system is the ability to provide to a user who has access to a rendered copy of a document access to an electronic version of that document. In some cases, a document is freely available on a public network or a private network to which the user has access. The system uses the captured text to identify, locate and retrieve the document, in some cases displaying it on the user's screen or depositing it in their email inbox.
In some cases, a document will be available in electronic form, but for a variety of reasons may not be accessible to the user. There may not be sufficient connectivity to retrieve the document, the user may not be entitled to retrieve it, there may be a cost associated with gaining access to it, or the document may have been withdrawn and possibly replaced by a new version, to name just a few possibilities. The system typically provides feedback to the user about these situations.
As mentioned in Section 7.4, the degree or nature of the access granted to a particular user may be different if it is known that the user already has access to a printed copy of the document.
8.1. Authenticated Document Access
Access to the document may be restricted to specific users, or to those meeting particular criteria, or may only be available in certain circumstances, for example when the user is connected to a secure network. Section 6 describes some of the ways in which the credentials of a user and scanner may be established.
8.2. Document Purchase—Copyright-owner Compensation
Documents that are not freely available to the general public may still be accessible on payment of a fee, often as compensation to the publisher or copyright-holder. The system may implement payment facilities directly or may make use of other payment methods associated with the user, including those described in Section 6.2.
8.3. Document Escrow and Proactive Retrieval
Electronic documents are often transient; the digital source version of a rendered document may be available now but inaccessible in future. The system may retrieve and store the existing version on behalf of the user, even if the user has not requested it, thus guaranteeing its availability should the user request it in future. This also makes it available for the system's use, for example for searching as part of the process of identifying future captures.
In the event that payment is required for access to the document, a trusted “document escrow” service can retrieve the document on behalf of the user, such as upon payment of a modest fee, with the assurance that the copyright holder will be fully compensated in future if the user should ever request the document from the service.
Variations on this theme can be implemented if the document is not available in electronic form at the time of capture. The user can authorize the service to submit a request for or make a payment for the document on his/her behalf if the electronic document should become available at a later date.
8.4. Association with other Subscriptions and Accounts
Sometimes payment may be waived, reduced or satisfied based on the user's existing association with another account or subscription. Subscribers to the printed version of a newspaper might automatically be entitled to retrieve the electronic version, for example.
In other cases, the association may not be quite so direct: a user may be granted access based on an account established by their employer, or based on their scanning of a printed copy owned by a friend who is a subscriber.
8.5. Replacing Photocopying with Scan-and-print
The process of capturing text from a paper document, identifying an electronic original, and printing that original, or some portion of that original associated with the capture, forms an alternative to traditional photocopying with many advantages:
8.6. Locating Valuable Originals from Photocopies
When documents are particularly valuable, as in the case of legal instruments or documents that have historical or other particular significance, people may typically work from copies of those documents, often for many years, while the originals are kept in a safe location.
The described system could be coupled to a database which records the location of an original document, for example in an archiving warehouse, making it easy for somebody with access to a copy to locate the archived original paper document.
9. Text Recognition Technologies
Optical Character Recognition (OCR) technologies have traditionally focused on images that include a large amount of text, for example from a flat-bed scanner capturing a whole page. OCR technologies often need substantial training and correcting by the user to produce useful text. OCR technologies often require substantial processing power on the machine doing the OCR, and, while many systems use a dictionary, they are generally expected to operate on an effectively infinite vocabulary.
All of the above traditional characteristics may be improved upon in the described system.
While this section focuses on OCR, many of the issues discussed map directly onto other recognition technologies, in particular speech recognition. As mentioned in Section 3.1, the process of capturing from paper may be achieved by a user reading the text aloud into a device which captures audio. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that principles discussed here with respect to images, fonts, and text fragments often also apply to audio samples, user speech models and phonemes.
9.1. Optimization for Appropriate Devices
A scanning device for use with the described system will often be small, portable, and low power. The scanning device may capture only a few words at a time, and in some implementations does not even capture a whole character at once, but rather a horizontal slice through the text, many such slices being stitched together to form a recognizable signal from which the text may be deduced. The scanning device may also have very limited processing power or storage so, while in some embodiments it may perform all of the OCR process itself, many embodiments will depend on a connection to a more powerful device, possibly at a later time, to convert the captured signals into text. Lastly, it may have very limited facilities for user interaction, so may need to defer any requests for user input until later, or operate in a “best-guess” mode to a greater degree than is common now.
9.2. “Uncertain” OCR
The primary new characteristic of OCR within the described system is the fact that it will, in general, examine images of text which exists elsewhere and which may be retrieved in digital form. An exact transcription of the text is therefore not always required from the OCR engine. The OCR system may output a set or a matrix of possible matches, in some cases including probability weightings, which can still be used to search for the digital original.
9.3. Iterative OCR—Guess, Disambiguate, Guess . . .
If the device performing the recognition is able to contact the document index at the time of processing, then the OCR process can be informed by the contents of the document corpus as it progresses, potentially offering substantially greater recognition accuracy.
Such a connection will also allow the device to inform the user when sufficient text has been captured to identify the digital source.
9.4. Using Knowledge of Likely Rendering
When the system has knowledge of aspects of the likely printed rendering of a document—such as the font typeface used in printing, or the layout of the page, or which sections are in italics—this too can help in the recognition process. (Section 4.1.1)
9.5. Font Caching—Determine Font on Host, Download to Client
As candidate source texts in the document corpus are identified, the font, or a rendering of it, may be downloaded to the device to help with the recognition.
9.6. Autocorrelation and Character Offsets
While component characters of a text fragment may be the most recognized way to represent a fragment of text that may be used as a document signature, other representations of the text may work sufficiently well that the actual text of a text fragment need not be used when attempting to locate the text fragment in a digital document and/or database, or when disambiguating the representation of a text fragment into a readable form. Other representations of text fragments may provide benefits that actual text representations lack. For example, optical character recognition of text fragments is often prone to errors, unlike other representations of captured text fragments that may be used to search for and/or recreate a text fragment without resorting to optical character recognition for the entire fragment. Such methods may be more appropriate for some devices used with the current system.
Those of ordinary skill in the art and others will appreciate that there are many ways of describing the appearance of text fragments. Such characterizations of text fragments may include, but are not limited to, word lengths, relative word lengths, character heights, character widths, character shapes, character frequencies, token frequencies, and the like. In some embodiments, the offsets between matching text tokens (i.e., the number of intervening tokens plus one) are used to characterize fragments of text.
Conventional OCR uses knowledge about fonts, letter structure and shape to attempt to determine characters in scanned text. Embodiments of the present invention are different; they employ a variety of methods that use the rendered text itself to assist in the recognition process. These embodiments use characters (or tokens) to “recognize each other.” One way to refer to such self-recognition is “template matching,” and is similar to “convolution.” To perform such self-recognition, the system slides a copy of the text horizontally over itself and notes matching regions of the text images. Prior template matching and convolution techniques encompass a variety of related techniques. These techniques to tokenize and/or recognize characters/tokens will be collectively referred to herein as “autocorrelation,” as the text is used to correlate with its own component parts when matching characters/tokens.
When autocorrelating, complete connected regions that match are of interest. This occurs when characters (or groups of characters) overlay other instances of the same character (or group). Complete connected regions that match automatically provide tokenizing of the text into component tokens. As the two copies of the text are slid past each other, the regions where perfect matching occurs (i.e., all pixels in a vertical slice are matched) are noted. When a character/token matches itself, the horizontal extent of this matching (e.g., the connected matching portion of the text) also matches.
Note that at this stage there is no need to determine the actual identity of each token (i.e., the particular letter, digit or symbol, or group of these, that corresponds to the token image), only the offset to the next occurrence of the same token in the scanned text. The offset number is the distance (number of tokens) to the next occurrence of the same token. If the token is unique within the text string, the offset is zero (0). The sequence of token offsets thus generated is a signature that can be used to identify the scanned text.
In some embodiments, the token offsets determined for a string of scanned tokens are compared to an index that indexes a corpus of electronic documents based upon the token offsets of their contents (Section 4.1.2). In other embodiments, the token offsets determined for a string of scanned tokens are converted to text, and compared to a more conventional index that indexes a corpus of electronic documents based upon their contents
As has been noted earlier, a similar token-correlation process may be applied to speech fragments when the capture process consists of audio samples of spoken words.
9.7. Font/character “Self-recognition”
Conventional template-matching OCR compares scanned images to a library of character images. In essence, the alphabet is stored for each font and newly scanned images are compared to the stored images to find matching characters. The process generally has an initial delay until the correct font has been identified. After that, the OCR process is relatively quick because most documents use the same font throughout. Subsequent images can therefore be converted to text by comparison with the most recently identified font library.
The shapes of characters in most commonly used fonts are related. For example, in most fonts, the letter “c” and the letter “e” are visually related—as are “t” and “f,” etc. The OCR process is enhanced by use of this relationship to construct templates for letters that have not been scanned yet. For example, where a reader scans a short string of text from a paper document in a previously unencountered font such that the system does not have a set of image templates with which to compare the scanned images the system can leverage the probable relationship between certain characters to construct the font template library even though it has not yet encountered all of the letters in the alphabet. The system can then use the constructed font template library to recognize subsequent scanned text and to further refine the constructed font library.
9.8. Send Anything Unrecognized (Including Graphics) to Server
When images cannot be machine-transcribed into a form suitable for use in a search process, the images themselves can be saved for later use by the user, for possible manual transcription, or for processing at a later date when different resources may be available to the system.
Many of the actions made possible by the system result in some commercial transaction taking place. The phrase p-commerce is used herein to describe commercial activities initiated from paper via the system.
10.1. Sales of Documents from their Physical Printed Copies.
When a user captures text from a document, the user may be offered that document for purchase either in paper or electronic form. The user may also be offered related documents, such as those quoted or otherwise referred to in the paper document, or those on a similar subject, or those by the same author.
10.2. Sales of Anything Else Initiated or Aided by Paper
The capture of text may be linked to other commercial activities in a variety of ways. The captured text may be in a catalog that is explicitly designed to sell items, in which case the text will be associated fairly directly with the purchase of an item (Section 18.2). The text may also be part of an advertisement, in which case a sale of the item being advertised may ensue.
In other cases, the user captures other text from which their potential interest in a commercial transaction may be deduced. A reader of a novel set in a particular country, for example, might be interested in a holiday there. Someone reading a review of a new car might be considering purchasing it. The user may capture a particular fragment of text knowing that some commercial opportunity will be presented to them as a result, or it may be a side-effect of their capture activities.
10.3. Capture of Labels, Icons, Serial Numbers, Barcodes on an Item Resulting in a Sale
Sometimes text or symbols are actually printed on an item or its packaging. An example is the serial number or product id often found on a label on the back or underside of a piece of electronic equipment. The system can offer the user a convenient way to purchase one or more of the same items by capturing that text. They may also be offered manuals, support or repair services.
10.4. Contextual Advertisements
In addition to the direct capture of text from an advertisement, the system allows for a new kind of advertising which is not necessarily explicitly in the rendered document, but is nonetheless based on what people are reading.
10.4.1. Advertising Based on Scan Context and History
In a traditional paper publication, advertisements generally consume a large amount of space relative to the text of a newspaper article, and a limited number of them can be placed around a particular article. In the described system, advertising can be associated with individual words or phrases, and can selected according to the particular interest the user has shown by capturing that text and possibly taking into account their history of past scans.
With the described system, it is possible for a purchase to be tied to a particular printed document and for an advertiser to get significantly more feedback about the effectiveness of their advertising in particular print publications.
10.4.2. Advertising Based on User Context and History
The system may gather a large amount of information about other aspects of a user's context for its own use (Section 13); estimates of the geographical location of the user are a good example. Such data can also be used to tailor the advertising presented to a user of the system.
10.5. Models of Compensation
The system enables some new models of compensation for advertisers and marketers. The publisher of a printed document containing advertisements may receive some income from a purchase that originated from their document. This may be true whether or not the advertisement existed in the original printed form; it may have been added electronically either by the publisher, the advertiser or some third party, and the sources of such advertising may have been subscribed to by the user.
10.5.1. Popularity-based Compensation
Analysis of the statistics generated by the system can reveal the popularity of certain parts of a publication (Section 14.2). In a newspaper, for example, it might reveal the amount of time readers spend looking at a particular page or article, or the popularity of a particular columnist. In some circumstances, it may be appropriate for an author or publisher to receive compensation based on the activities of the readers rather than on more traditional metrics such as words written or number of copies distributed. An author whose work becomes a frequently read authority on a subject might be considered differently in future contracts from one whose books have sold the same number of copies but are rarely opened. (See also Section 7.6)
10.5.2. Popularity-based Advertising
Decisions about advertising in a document may also be based on statistics about the readership. The advertising space around the most popular columnists may be sold at a premium rate. Advertisers might even be charged or compensated some time after the document is published based on knowledge about how it was received.
10.6. Marketing Based on Life Library
The “Life Library” or scan history described in Sections 6.1 and 16.1 can be an extremely valuable source of information about the interests and habits of a user. Subject to the appropriate consent and privacy issues, such data can inform offers of goods or services to the user. Even in an anonymous form, the statistics gathered can be exceedingly useful.
10.7. Sale/information at Later Date (when Available)
Advertising and other opportunities for commercial transactions may not be presented to the user immediately at the time of text capture. For example, the opportunity to purchase a sequel to a novel may not be available at the time the user is reading the novel, but the system may present them with that opportunity when the sequel is published.
A user may capture data that relates to a purchase or other commercial transaction, but may choose not to initiate and/or complete the transaction at the time the capture is made. In some embodiments, data related to captures is stored in a user's Life Library, and these Life Library entries can remain “active” (i.e., capable of subsequent interactions similar to those available at the time the capture was made). Thus a user may review a capture at some later time, and optionally complete a transaction based on that capture. Because the system can keep track of when and where the original capture occurred, all parties involved in the transaction can be properly compensated. For example, the author who wrote the story—and the publisher who published the story—that appeared next to the advertisement from which the user captured data can be compensated when, six months later, the user visits their Life Library, selects that particular capture from the history, and chooses “Purchase this item at Amazon” from the pop-up menu (which can be similar or identical to the menu optionally presented at the time of the capture).
11. Operating System and Application Integration
Modern Operating Systems (OSs) and other software packages have many characteristics that can be advantageously exploited for use with the described system, and may also be modified in various ways to provide an even better platform for its use.
11.1. Incorporation of Scan and Print-related Information in Metadata and Indexing
New and upcoming file systems and their associated databases often have the ability to store a variety of metadata associated with each file. Traditionally, this metadata has included such things as the ID of the user who created the file, the dates of creation, last modification, and last use. Newer file systems allow such extra information as keywords, image characteristics, document sources and user comments to be stored, and in some systems this metadata can be arbitrarily extended. File systems can therefore be used to store information that would be useful in implementing the current system. For example, the date when a given document was last printed can be stored by the file system, as can details about which text from it has been captured from paper using the described system, and when and by whom.
Operating systems are also starting to incorporate search engine facilities that allow users to find local files more easily. These facilities can be advantageously used by the system. It means that many of the search-related concepts discussed in Sections 3 and 4 apply not just to today's Internet-based and similar search engines, but also to every personal computer.
In some cases specific software applications will also include support for the system above and beyond the facilities provided by the OS.
11.2. OS Support for Capture Devices
As the use of capture devices such as pen scanners becomes increasingly common, it will become desirable to build support for them into the operating system, in much the same way as support is provided for mice and printers, since the applicability of capture devices extends beyond a single software application. The same will be true for other aspects of the system's operation. Some examples are discussed below. In some embodiments, the entire described system, or the core of it, is provided by the OS. In some embodiments, support for the system is provided by Application Programming Interfaces (APIS) that can be used by other software packages, including those directly implementing aspects of the system.
11.2.1. Support for OCR and other Recognition Technologies
Most of the methods of capturing text from a rendered document require some recognition software to interpret the source data, typically a scanned image or some spoken words, as text suitable for use in the system. Some OSs include support for speech or handwriting recognition, though it is less common for OSs to include support for OCR, since in the past the use of OCR has typically been limited to a small range of applications.
As recognition components become part of the OS, they can take better advantage of other facilities provided by the OS. Many systems include spelling dictionaries, grammar analysis tools, internationalization and localization facilities, for example, all of which can be advantageously employed by the described system for its recognition process, especially since they may have been customized for the particular user to include words and phrases that he/she would commonly encounter.
If the operating system includes full-text indexing facilities, then these can also be used to inform the recognition process, as described in Section 9.3.
11.2.2. Action to be Taken on Scans
If an optical scan or other capture occurs and is presented to the OS, it may have a default action to be taken under those circumstances in the event that no other subsystem claims ownership of the capture. An example of a default action is presenting the user with a choice of alternatives, or submitting the captured text to the OS's built-in search facilities.
11.2.3. OS has Default Action for Particular Documents or Document Types
If the digital source of the rendered document is found, the OS may have a standard action that it will take when that particular document, or a document of that class, is scanned. Applications and other subsystems may register with the OS as potential handlers of particular types of capture, in a similar manner to the announcement by applications of their ability to handle certain file types.
Markup data associated with a rendered document, or with a capture from a document, can include instructions to the operating system to launch specific applications, pass applications arguments, parameters, or data, etc.
11.2.4. Interpretation of Gestures and Mapping into Standard Actions
In Section 12.1.3 the use of “gestures” is discussed, particularly in the case of optical scanning, where particular movements made with a handheld scanner might represent standard actions such as marking the start and end of a region of text.
This is analogous to actions such as pressing the shift key on a keyboard while using the cursor keys to select a region of text, or using the wheel on a mouse to scroll a document. Such actions by the user are sufficiently standard that they are interpreted in a system-wide way by the OS, thus ensuring consistent behavior. The same is desirable for scanner gestures and other scanner-related actions.
11.2.5. Set Response to Standard (and Non-standard) Iconic/text Printed Menu Items
In a similar way, certain items of text or other symbols may, when scanned, cause standard actions to occur, and the OS may provide a selection of these. An example might be that scanning the text “[print]” in any document would cause the OS to retrieve and print a copy of that document. The OS may also provide a way to register such actions and associate them with particular scans.
11.3. Support in System GUI Components for Typical Scan-initiated Activities
Most software applications are based substantially on standard Graphical User Interface components provided by the OS.
Use of these components by developers helps to ensure consistent behavior across multiple packages, for example that pressing the left-cursor key in any text-editing context should move the cursor to the left, without every programmer having to implement the same functionality independently.
A similar consistency in these components is desirable when the activities are initiated by text-capture or other aspects of the described system. Some examples are given below.
11.3.1. Interface to Find Particular Text Content
A typical use of the system may be for the user to scan an area of a paper document, and for the system to open the electronic counterpart in a software package that is able to display or edit it, and cause that package to scroll to and highlight the scanned text (Section 12.2.1). The first part of this process, finding and opening the electronic document, is typically provided by the OS and is standard across software packages. The second part, however—locating a particular piece of text within a document and causing the package to scroll to it and highlight it—is not yet standardized and is often implemented differently by each package. The availability of a standard API for this functionality could greatly enhance the operation of this aspect of the system.
11.3.2. Text Interactions
Once a piece of text has been located within a document, the system may wish to perform a variety of operations upon that text. As an example, the system may request the surrounding text, so that the user's capture of a few words could result in the system accessing the entire sentence or paragraph containing them. Again, this functionality can be usefully provided by the OS rather than being implemented in every piece of software that handles text.
11.3.3. Contextual (Popup) Menus
Some of the operations that are enabled by the system will require user feedback, and this may be optimally requested within the context of the application handling the data. In some embodiments, the system uses the application pop-up menus traditionally associated with clicking the right mouse button on some text. The system inserts extra options into such menus, and causes them to be displayed as a result of activities such as scanning a paper document.
11.4. Web/network Interfaces
In today's increasingly networked world, much of the functionality available on individual machines can also be accessed over a network, and the functionality associated with the described system is no exception. As an example, in an office environment, many paper documents received by a user may have been printed by other users' machines on the same corporate network. The system on one computer, in response to a capture, may be able to query those other machines for documents which may correspond to that capture, subject to the appropriate permission controls.
11.5. Printing of Document Causes Saving
An important factor in the integration of paper and digital documents is maintaining as much information as possible about the transitions between the two. In some embodiments, the OS keeps a simple record of when any document was printed and by whom. In some embodiments, the OS takes one or more further actions that would make it better suited for use with the system. Examples include:
11.6. My (Printed/Scanned) Documents
An OS often maintains certain categories of folders or files that have particular significance. A user's documents may, by convention or design, be found in a “My Documents” folder, for example. Standard file-opening dialogs may automatically include a list of recently opened documents.
On an OS optimized for use with the described system, such categories may be enhanced or augmented in ways that take into account a user's interaction with paper versions of the stored files. Categories such as “My Printed Documents” or “My Recently-Read Documents” might usefully be identified and incorporated in its operations.
11.7. OS-level Markup Hierarchies
Since important aspects of the system are typically provided using the “markup” concepts discussed in Section 5, it would clearly be advantageous to have support for such markup provided by the OS in a way that was accessible to multiple applications as well as to the OS itself. In addition, layers of markup may be provided by the OS, based on its own knowledge of documents under its control and the facilities it is able to provide.
11.8. Use of OS DRM Facilities
An increasing number of operating systems support some form of “Digital Rights Management”: the ability to control the use of particular data according to the rights granted to a particular user, software entity or machine. It may inhibit unauthorized copying or distribution of a particular document, for example.
12. User Interface
The user interface of the system may be entirely on a PC, if the capture device is relatively dumb and is connected to it by a cable, or entirely on the device, if it is sophisticated and with significant processing power of its own. In some cases, some functionality resides in each component. Part, or indeed all, of the system's functionality may also be implemented on other devices such as mobile phones or PDAs.
The descriptions in the following sections are therefore indications of what may be desirable in certain implementations, but they are not necessarily appropriate for all and may be modified in several ways.
12.1. On the Capture Device
With all capture devices, but particularly in the case of an optical scanner, the user's attention will generally be on the device and the paper at the time of scanning. It is very desirable, then, that any input and feedback needed as part of the process of scanning do not require the user's attention to be elsewhere, for example on the screen of a computer, more than is necessary.
12.1.1. Feedback on Scanner
A handheld scanner may have a variety of ways of providing feedback to the user about particular conditions. The most obvious types are direct visual, where the scanner incorporates indicator lights or even a full display, and auditory, where the scanner can make beeps, clicks or other sounds. Important alternatives include tactile feedback, where the scanner can vibrate, buzz, or otherwise stimulate the user's sense of touch, and projected feedback, where it indicates a status by projecting onto the paper anything from a colored spot of light to a sophisticated display.
Important immediate feedback that may be provided on the device includes:
Many of the user interactions normally associated with the later stages of the system may also take place on the capture device if it has sufficient abilities, for example, to display part or all of a document.
12.1.2. Controls on Scanner
The device may provide a variety of ways for the user to provide input in addition to basic text capture. Even when the device is in close association with a host machine that has input options such as keyboards and mice, it can be disruptive for the user to switch back and forth between manipulating the scanner and using a mouse, for example.
The handheld scanner may have buttons, scroll/jog-wheels, touch-sensitive surfaces, and/or accelerometers for detecting the movement of the device. Some of these allow a richer set of interactions while still holding the scanner.
For example, in response to scanning some text, the system presents the user with a set of several possible matching documents. The user uses a scroll-wheel on the side of the scanner is to select one from the list, and clicks a button to confirm the selection.
The primary reason for moving a scanner across the paper is to capture text, but some movements may be detected by the device and used to indicate other user intentions. Such movements are referred to herein as “gestures.”
As an example, the user can indicate a large region of text by scanning the first few words in conventional left-to-right order, and the last few in reverse order, i.e. right to left. The user can also indicate the vertical extent of the text of interest by moving the scanner down the page over several lines. A backwards scan might indicate cancellation of the previous scan operation.
12.1.4. Online/Offline Behavior
Many aspects of the system may depend on network connectivity, either between components of the system such as a scanner and a host laptop, or with the outside world in the form of a connection to corporate databases and Internet search. This connectivity may not be present all the time, however, and so there will be occasions when part or all of the system may be considered to be “offline.” It is desirable to allow the system to continue to function usefully in those circumstances.
The device may be used to capture text when it is out of contact with other parts of the system. A very simple device may simply be able to store the image or audio data associated with the capture, ideally with a timestamp indicating when it was captured. The various captures may be uploaded to the rest of the system when the device is next in contact with it, and handled then. The device may also upload other data associated with the captures, for example voice annotations associated with optical scans, or location information.
More sophisticated devices may be able to perform some or all of the system operations themselves despite being disconnected. Various techniques for improving their ability to do so are discussed in Section 15.3. Often it will be the case that some, but not all, of the desired actions can be performed while offline. For example, the text may be recognized, but identification of the source may depend on a connection to an Internet-based search engine. In some embodiments, the device therefore stores sufficient information about how far each operation has progressed for the rest of the system to proceed efficiently when connectivity is restored.
The operation of the system will, in general, benefit from immediately available connectivity, but there are some situations in which performing several captures and then processing them as a batch can have advantages. For example, as discussed in Section 13 below, the identification of the source of a particular capture may be greatly enhanced by examining other captures made by the user at approximately the same time. In a fully connected system where live feedback is being provided to the user, the system is only able to use past captures when processing the current one. If the capture is one of a batch stored by the device when offline, however, the system will be able to take into account any data available from later captures as well as earlier ones when doing its analysis.
12.2. On a Host Device
A scanner will often communicate with some other device, such as a PC, PDA, phone or digital camera to perform many of the functions of the system, including more detailed interactions with the user.
12.2.1. Activities Performed in Response to a Capture
When the host device receives a capture, it may initiate a variety of activities. An incomplete list of possible activities performed by the system after locating and electronic counterpart document associated with the capture and a location within that document follows.
12.2.2. Contextual Popup Menus
Sometimes the appropriate action to be taken by the system will be obvious, but sometimes it will require a choice to be made by the user. One good way to do this is through the use of “popup menus” or, in cases where the content is also being displayed on a screen, with so-called “contextual menus” that appear close to the content. (See Section 11.3.3). In some embodiments, the scanner device projects a popup menu onto the paper document. A user may select from such menus using traditional methods such as a keyboard and mouse, or by using controls on the capture device (Section 12.1.2), gestures (Section 12.1.3), or by interacting with the computer display using the scanner (Section 12.2.4). In some embodiments, the popup menus which can appear as a result of a capture include default items representing actions which occur if the user does not respond—for example, if the user ignores the menu and makes another capture.
12.2.3. Feedback on Disambiguation
When a user starts capturing text, there will initially be several documents or other text locations that it could match. As more text is captured, and other factors are taken into account (Section 13), the number of candidate locations will decrease until the actual location is identified, or further disambiguation is not possible without user input. In some embodiments, the system provides a real-time display of the documents or the locations found, for example in list, thumbnail-image or text-segment form, and for the number of elements in that display to reduce in number as capture continues. In some embodiments, the system displays thumbnails of all candidate documents, where the size or position of the thumbnail is dependent on the probability of it being the correct match.
When a capture is unambiguously identified, this fact may be emphasized to the user, for example using audio feedback.
Sometimes the text captured will occur in many documents and will be recognized to be a quotation. The system may indicate this on the screen, for example by grouping documents containing a quoted reference around the original source document.
12.2.4. Scanning from Screen
Some optical scanners may be able to capture text displayed on a screen as well as on paper. Accordingly, the term rendered document is used herein to indicate that printing onto paper is not the only form of rendering, and that the capture of text or symbols for use by the system may be equally valuable when that text is displayed on an electronic display.
The user of the described system may be required to interact with a computer screen for a variety of other reasons, such as to select from a list of options. It can be inconvenient for the user to put down the scanner and start using the mouse or keyboard. Other sections have described physical controls on the scanner (Section 12.1.2) or gestures (Section 12.1.3) as methods of input which do not require this change of tool, but using the scanner on the screen itself to scan some text or symbol is an important alternative provided by the system.
In some embodiments, the optics of the scanner allow it to be used in a similar manner to a light-pen, directly sensing its position on the screen without the need for actual scanning of text, possibly with the aid of special hardware or software on the computer.
13. Context Interpretation
An important aspect of the described system is the use of other factors, beyond the simple capture of a string of text, to help identify the document in use. A capture of a modest amount of text may often identify the document uniquely, but in many situations it will identify a few candidate documents. One solution is to prompt the user to confirm the document being scanned, but a preferable alternative is to make use of other factors to narrow down the possibilities automatically. Such supplemental information can dramatically reduce the amount of text that needs to be captured and/or increase the reliability and speed with which the location in the electronic counterpart can be identified. This extra material is referred to as “context,” and it was discussed briefly in Section 4.2.2. We now consider it in more depth.
13.1. System and Capture Context
Perhaps the most important example of such information is the user's capture history.
It is highly probable that any given capture comes from the same document as the previous one, or from an associated document, especially if the previous capture took place in the last few minutes (Section 6.1.2). Conversely, if the system detects that the font has changed between two scans, it is more likely that they are from different documents.
Also useful are the user's longer-term capture history and reading habits. These can also be used to develop a model of the user's interests and associations.
13.2. User's Real-world Context
Another example of useful context is the user's geographical location. A user in Paris is much more likely to be reading Le Monde than the Seattle Times, for example. The timing, size and geographical distribution of printed versions of the documents can therefore be important, and can to some degree be deduced from the operation of the system.
The time of day may also be relevant, for example in the case of a user who always reads one type of publication on the way to work, and a different one at lunchtime or on the train going home.
13.3. Related Digital Context
The user's recent use of electronic documents, including those searched for or retrieved by more conventional means, can also be a helpful indicator.
In some cases, such as on a corporate network, other factors may be usefully considered:
All of these examples might suggest that a user was more likely to be reading a paper version of those documents. In contrast, if the repository in which a document resides can affirm that the document has never been printed or sent anywhere where it might have been printed, then it can be safely eliminated in any searches originating from paper.
13.4. Other Statistics—the Global Context
Section 14 covers the analysis of the data stream resulting from paper-based searches, but it should be noted here that statistics about the popularity of documents with other readers, about the timing of that popularity, and about the parts of documents most frequently scanned are all examples of further factors which can be beneficial in the search process. The system brings the possibility of Google-type page-ranking to the world of paper.
See also Section 4.2.2 for some other implications of the use of context for search engines.
14. Data-stream Analysis
The use of the system generates an exceedingly valuable data-stream as a side effect. This stream is a record of what users are reading and when, and is in many cases a record of what they find particularly valuable in the things they read. Such data has never really been available before for paper documents.
Some ways in which this data can be useful for the system, and for the user of the system, are described in Section 6.1. This section concentrates on its use for others. There are, of course, substantial privacy issues to be considered with any distribution of data about what people are reading, but such issues as preserving the anonymity of data are well known to those of skill in the art.
14.1. Document Tracking
When the system knows which documents any given user is reading, it can also deduce who is reading any given document. This allows the tracking of a document through an organization, to allow analysis, for example, of who is reading it and when, how widely it was distributed, how long that distribution took, and who has seen current versions while others are still working from out-of-date copies.
For published documents that have a wider distribution, the tracking of individual copies is more difficult, but the analysis of the distribution of readership is still possible.
14.2. Read Ranking—Popularity of Documents and Sub-regions
In situations where users are capturing text or other data that is of particular interest to them, the system can deduce the popularity of certain documents and of particular sub-regions of those documents. This forms a valuable input to the system itself (Section 4.2.2) and an important source of information for authors, publishers and advertisers (Section 7.6, Section 10.5). This data is also useful when integrated in search engines and search indices—for example, to assist in ranking search results for queries coming from rendered documents, and/or to assist in ranking conventional queries typed into a web browser.
14.3. Analysis of Users—Building Profiles
Knowledge of what a user is reading enables the system to create a quite detailed model of the user's interests and activities. This can be useful on an abstract statistical basis—“35% of users who buy this newspaper also read the latest book by that author”—but it can also allow other interactions with the individual user, as discussed below.
14.3.1. Social Networking
One example is connecting one user with others who have related interests. These may be people already known to the user. The system may ask a university professor, “Did you know that your colleague at XYZ University has also just read this paper?” The system may ask a user, “Do you want to be linked up with other people in your neighborhood who are also how reading Jane Eyre?” Such links may be the basis for the automatic formation of book clubs and similar social structures, either in the physical world or online.
Section 10.6 has already mentioned the idea of offering products and services to an individual user based on their interactions with the system. Current online booksellers, for example, often make recommendations to a user based on their previous interactions with the bookseller. Such recommendations become much more useful when they are based on interactions with the actual books.
14.4. Marketing Based on other Aspects of the Data-stream
We have discussed some of the ways in which the system may influence those publishing documents, those advertising through them, and other sales initiated from paper (Section 10). Some commercial activities may have no direct interaction with the paper documents at all and yet may be influenced by them. For example, the knowledge that people in one community spend more time reading the sports section of the newspaper than they do the financial section might be of interest to somebody setting up a health club.
14.5. Types of Data that may be Captured
In addition to the statistics discussed, such as who is reading which bits of which documents, and when and where, it can be of interest to examine the actual contents of the text captured, regardless of whether or not the document has been located.
In many situations, the user will also not just be capturing some text, but will be causing some action to occur as a result. It might be emailing a reference to the document to an acquaintance, for example. Even in the absence of information about the identity of the user or the recipient of the email, the knowledge that somebody considered the document worth emailing is very useful.
In addition to the various methods discussed for deducing the value of a particular document or piece of text, in some circumstances the user will explicitly indicate the value by assigning it a rating.
Lastly, when a particular set of users are known to form a group, for example when they are known to be employees of a particular company, the aggregated statistics of that group can be used to deduce the importance of a particular document to that group.
15. Device Features and Functions
A capture device for use with the system needs little more than a way of capturing text from a rendered version of the document. As described earlier (Section 1.2), this capture may be achieved through a variety of methods including taking a photograph of part of the document or typing some words into a mobile phone keypad. This capture may be achieved using a small hand-held optical scanner capable of recording a line or two of text at a time, or an audio capture device such as a voice-recorder into which the user is reading text from the document. The device used may be a combination of these—an optical scanner which could also record voice annotations, for example—and the capturing functionality may be built into some other device such as a mobile phone, PDA, digital camera or portable music player.
15.1. Input and Output
Many of the possibly beneficial additional input and output facilities for such a device have been described in Section 12.1. They include buttons, scroll-wheels and touch-pads for input, and displays, indicator lights, audio and tactile transducers for output. Sometimes the device will incorporate many of these, sometimes very few. Sometimes the capture device will be able to communicate with another device that already has them (Section 15.6), for example using a wireless link, and sometimes the capture functionality will be incorporated into such other device (Section 15.7).
In some embodiments, the device implements the majority of the system itself. In some embodiments, however, it often communicates with a PC or other computing device and with the wider world using communications facilities.
Often these communications facilities are in the form of a general-purpose data network such as Ethernet, 802.11 or UWB or a standard peripheral-connecting network such as USB, IEEE-1394 (Firewire), Bluetooth™ or infra-red. When a wired connection such as Firewire or USB is used, the device may receive electrical power though the same connection. In some circumstances, the capture device may appear to a connected machine to be a conventional peripheral such as a USB storage device.
Lastly, the device may in some circumstances “dock” with another device, either to be used in conjunction with that device or for convenient storage.
15.3. Caching and Other Online/offline Functionality
Sections 3.5 and 12.1.4 have raised the topic of disconnected operation. When a capture device has a limited subset of the total system's functionality, and is not in communication with the other parts of the system, the device can still be useful, though the functionality available will sometimes be reduced. At the simplest level, the device can record the raw image or audio data being captured and this can be processed later. For the user's benefit, however, it can be important to give feedback where possible about whether the data captured is likely to be sufficient for the task in hand, whether it can be recognized or is likely to be recognizable, and whether the source of the data can be identified or is likely to be identifiable later. The user will then know whether their capturing activity is worthwhile. Even when all of the above are unknown, the raw data can still be stored so that, at the very least, the user can refer to them later. The user may be presented with the image of a scan, for example, when the scan cannot be recognized by the OCR process.
To illustrate some of the range of options available, both a rather minimal optical scanning device and then a much more full-featured one are described below. Many devices occupy a middle ground between the two.
15.3.1. The SimpleScanner—a Low-end Offline Example
The SimpleScanner has a scanning head able to read pixels from the page as it is moved along the length of a line of text. It can detect its movement along the page and record the pixels with some information about the movement. It also has a clock, which allows each scan to be time-stamped. The clock is synchronized with a host device when the SimpleScanner has connectivity. The clock may not represent the actual time of day, but relative times may be determined from it so that the host can deduce the actual time of a scan, or at worst the elapsed time between scans.
The SimpleScanner does not have sufficient processing power to perform any OCR itself, but it does have some basic knowledge about typical word-lengths, word-spacings, and their relationship to font size. It has some basic indicator lights which tell the user whether the scan is likely to be readable, whether the head is being moved too fast, too slowly or too inaccurately across the paper, and when it determines that sufficient words of a given size are likely to have been scanned for the document to be identified.
The SimpleScanner has a USB connector and can be plugged into the USB port on a computer, where it will be recharged. To the computer it appears to be a USB storage device on which time-stamped data files have been recorded, and the rest of the system software takes over from this point.
15.3.2. The SuperScanner—a High-end Offline Example
The SuperScanner also depends on connectivity for its full operation, but it has a significant amount of on-board storage and processing which can help it make better judgments about the data captured while offline.
As it moves along the line of text, the captured pixels are stitched together and passed to an OCR engine that attempts to recognize the text. A number of fonts, including those from the user's most-read publications, have been downloaded to it to help perform this task, as has a dictionary that is synchronized with the user's spelling-checker dictionary on their PC and so contains many of the words they frequently encounter. Also stored on the scanner is a list of words and phrases with the typical frequency of their use—this may be combined with the dictionary. The scanner can use the frequency statistics both to help with the recognition process and also to inform its judgment about when a sufficient quantity of text has been captured; more frequently used phrases are less likely to be useful as the basis for a search query.
In addition, the full index for the articles in the recent issues of the newspapers and periodicals most commonly read by the user are stored on the device, as are the indices for the books the user has recently purchased from an online bookseller, or from which the user has scanned anything within the last few months. Lastly, the titles of several thousand of the most popular publications which have data available for the system are stored so that, in the absence of other information the user can scan the title and have a good idea as to whether or not captures from a particular work are likely to be retrievable in electronic form later.
During the scanning process, the system informs user that the captured data has been of sufficient quality and of a sufficient nature to make it probable that the electronic copy can be retrieved when connectivity is restored. Often the system indicates to the user that the scan is known to have been successful and that the context has been recognized in one of the on-board indices, or that the publication concerned is known to be making its data available to the system, so the later retrieval ought to be successful.
The SuperScanner docks in a cradle connected to a PC's Firewire or USB port, at which point, in addition to the upload of captured data, its various onboard indices and other databases are updated based on recent user activity and new publications. It also has the facility to connect to wireless public networks or to communicate via Bluetooth to a mobile phone and thence with the public network when such facilities are available.
15.4. Features for Optical Scanning
We now consider some of the features that may be particularly desirable in an optical scanner device.
15.4.1. Flexible Positioning and Convenient Optics
One of the reasons for the continuing popularity of paper is the ease of its use in a wide variety of situations where a computer, for example, would be impractical or inconvenient. A device intended to capture a substantial part of a user's interaction with paper should therefore be similarly convenient in use. This has not been the case for scanners in the past; even the smallest hand-held devices have been somewhat unwieldy. Those designed to be in contact with the page have to be held at a precise angle to the paper and moved very carefully along the length of the text to be scanned. This is acceptable when scanning a business report on an office desk, but may be impractical when scanning a phrase from a novel while waiting for a train. Scanners based on camera-type optics that operate at a distance from the paper may similarly be useful in some circumstances.
Some embodiments of the system use a scanner that scans in contact with the paper, and which, instead of lenses, uses an image conduit a bundle of optical fibers to transmit the image from the page to the optical sensor device. Such a device can be shaped to allow it to be held in a natural position; for example, in some embodiments, the part in contact with the page is wedge-shaped, allowing the user's hand to move more naturally over the page in a movement similar to the use of a highlighter pen. The conduit is either in direct contact with the paper or in close proximity to it, and may have a replaceable transparent tip that can protect the image conduit from possible damage. As has been mentioned in Section 12.2.4, the scanner may be used to scan from a screen as well as from paper, and the material of the tip can be chosen to reduce the likelihood of damage to such displays.
Lastly, some embodiments of the device will provide feedback to the user during the scanning process which will indicate through the use of light, sound or tactile feedback when the user is scanning too fast, too slow, too unevenly or is drifting too high or low on the scanned line.
15.5. Security, Identity, Authentication, Personalization and Billing
As described in Section 6, the capture device may form an important part of identification and authorization for secure transactions, purchases, and a variety of other operations. It may therefore incorporate, in addition to the circuitry and software required for such a role, various hardware features that can make it more secure, such as a smartcard reader, RFID, or a keypad on which to type a PIN.
It may also include various biometric sensors to help identify the user. In the case of an optical scanner, for example, the scanning head may also be able to read a fingerprint. For a voice recorder, the voice pattern of the user may be used.
15.6. Device Associations
In some embodiments, the device is able to form an association with other nearby devices to increase either its own or their functionality. In some embodiments, for example, it uses the display of a nearby PC or phone to give more detailed feedback about its operation, or uses their network connectivity. The device may, on the other hand, operate in its role as a security and identification device to authenticate operations performed by the other device. Or it may simply form an association in order to function as a peripheral to that device.
An interesting aspect of such associations is that they may be initiated and authenticated using the capture facilities of the device. For example, a user wishing to identify themselves securely to a public computer terminal may use the scanning facilities of the device to scan a code or symbol displayed on a particular area of the terminal's screen and so effect a key transfer. An analogous process may be performed using audio signals picked up by a voice-recording device.
15.7. Integration with Other Devices
In some embodiments, the functionality of the capture device is integrated into some other device that is already in use. The integrated devices may be able to share a power supply, data capture and storage capabilities, and network interfaces. Such integration may be done simply for convenience, to reduce cost, or to enable functionality that would not otherwise be available.
Some examples of devices into which the capture functionality can be integrated include:
15.7.1. Mobile Phone Integration
As an example of the benefits of integration, we consider the use of a modified mobile phone as the capture device.
In some embodiments, the phone hardware is not modified to support the system, such as where the text capture can be adequately done through voice recognition, where they can either be processed by the phone itself, or handled by a system at the other end of a telephone call, or stored in the phone's memory for future processing. Many modern phones have the ability to download software that could implement some parts of the system. Such voice capture is likely to be suboptimal in many situations, however, for example when there is substantial background noise, and accurate voice recognition is a difficult task at the best of times. The audio facilities may best be used to capture voice annotations.
In some embodiments, the camera built into many mobile phones is used to capture an image of the text. The phone display, which would normally act as a viewfinder for the camera, may overlay on the live camera image information about the quality of the image and its suitability for OCR, which segments of text are being captured, and even a transcription of the text if the OCR can be performed on the phone.
In some embodiments, the phone is modified to add dedicated capture facilities, or to provide such functionality in a clip-on adaptor or a separate Bluetooth-connected peripheral in communication with the phone. Whatever the nature of the capture mechanism, the integration with a modern cellphone has many other advantages. The phone has connectivity with the wider world, which means that queries can be submitted to remote search engines or other parts of the system, and copies of documents may be retrieved for immediate storage or viewing. A phone typically has sufficient processing power for many of the functions of the system to be performed locally, and sufficient storage to capture a reasonable amount of data. The amount of storage can also often be expanded by the user. Phones have reasonably good displays and audio facilities to provide user feedback, and often a vibrate function for tactile feedback. They also have good power supplies.
Most significantly of all, they are a device that most users are already carrying.
This section lists example uses of the system and applications that may be built on it. This list is intended to be purely illustrative and in no sense exhaustive.
16. Personal Applications
16.1. Life Library
The Life Library (see also Section 6.1.1) is a digital archive of any important documents that the subscriber wishes to save and is a set of embodiments of services of this system. Important books, magazine articles, newspaper clippings, etc., can all be saved in digital form in the Life Library. Additionally, the subscriber's annotations, comments, and notes can be saved with the documents. The Life Library can be accessed via the Internet and World Wide Web.
The system creates and manages the Life Library document archive for subscribers. The subscriber indicates which documents the subscriber wishes to have saved in his life library by scanning information from the document or by otherwise indicating to the system that the particular document is to be added to the subscriber's Life Library. The scanned information is typically text from the document but can also be a barcode or other code identifying the document. The system accepts the code and uses it to identify the source document. After the document is identified the system can store either a copy of the document in the user's Life Library or a link to a source where the document may be obtained.
One embodiment of the Life Library system can check whether the subscriber is authorized to obtain the electronic copy. For example, if a reader scans text or an identifier from a copy of an article in the New York Times (NYT) so that the article will be added to the reader's Life Library, the Life Library system will verify with the NYT whether the reader is subscribed to the online version of the NYT; if so, the reader gets a copy of the article stored in his Life Library account; if not, information identifying the document and how to order it is stored in his Life Library account.
In some embodiments, the system maintains a subscriber profile for each subscriber that includes access privilege information. Document access information can be compiled in several ways, two of which are: 1) the subscriber supplies the document access information to the Life Library system, along with his account names and passwords, etc., or 2) the Life Library service provider queries the publisher with the subscriber's information and the publisher responds by providing access to an electronic copy if the Life Library subscriber is authorized to access the material. If the Life Library subscriber is not authorized to have an electronic copy of the document, the publisher provides a price to the Life Library service provider, which then provides the customer with the option to purchase the electronic document. If so, the Life Library service provider either pays the publisher directly and bills the Life Library customer later or the Life Library service provider immediately bills the customer's credit card for the purchase. The Life Library service provider would get a percentage of the purchase price or a small fixed fee for facilitating the transaction.
The system can archive the document in the subscriber's personal library and/or any other library to which the subscriber has archival privileges. For example, as a user scans text from a printed document, the Life Library system can identify the rendered document and its electronic counterpart. After the source document is identified, the Life Library system might record information about the source document in the user's personal library and in a group library to which the subscriber has archival privileges. Group libraries are collaborative archives such as a document repository for: a group working together on a project, a group of academic researchers, a group web log, etc.
The life library can be organized in many ways: chronologically, by topic, by level of the subscriber's interest, by type of publication (newspaper, book, magazine, technical paper, etc.), where read, when read, by ISBN or by Dewey decimal, etc. In one alternative, the system can learn classifications based on how other subscribers have classified the same document. The system can suggest classifications to the user or automatically classify the document for the user.
In various embodiments, annotations may be inserted directly into the document or may be maintained in a separate file. For example, when a subscriber scans text from a newspaper article, the article is archived in his Life Library with the scanned text highlighted. Alternatively, the article is archived in his Life Library along with an associated annotation file (thus leaving the archived document unmodified). Embodiments of the system can keep a copy of the source document in each subscriber's library, a copy in a master library that many subscribers can access, or link to a copy held by the publisher.
In some embodiments, the Life Library stores only the user's modifications to the document (e.g., highlights, etc.) and a link to an online version of the document (stored elsewhere). The system or the subscriber merges the changes with the document when the subscriber subsequently retrieves the document.
If the annotations are kept in a separate file, the source document and the annotation file are provided to the subscriber and the subscriber combines them to create a modified document. Alternatively, the system combines the two files prior to presenting them to the subscriber. In another alternative, the annotation file is an overlay to the document file and can be overlaid on the document by software in the subscriber's computer.
Subscribers to the Life Library service pay a monthly fee to have the system maintain the subscriber's archive. Alternatively, the subscriber pays a small amount (e.g., a micro-payment) for each document stored in the archive. Alternatively, the subscriber pays to access the subscriber's archive on a per-access fee. Alternatively, subscribers can compile libraries and allow others to access the materials/annotations on a revenue share model with the Life Library service provider and copyright holders. Alternatively, the Life Library service provider receives a payment from the publisher when the Life Library subscriber orders a document (a revenue share model with the publisher, where the Life Library service provider gets a share of the publisher's revenue).
In some embodiments, the Life Library service provider acts as an intermediary between the subscriber and the copyright holder (or copyright holder's agent, such as the Copyright Clearance Center, a.k.a. CCC) to facilitate billing and payment for copyrighted materials. The Life Library service provider uses the subscriber's billing information and other user account information to provide this intermediation service. Essentially, the Life Library service provider leverages the pre-existing relationship with the subscriber to enable purchase of copyrighted materials on behalf of the subscriber.
In some embodiments, the Life Library system can store excerpts from documents. For example, when a subscriber scans text from a paper document, the regions around the scanned text are excerpted and placed in the Life Library, rather than the entire document being archived in the life library. This is especially advantageous when the document is long because preserving the circumstances of the original scan prevents the subscriber from re-reading the document to find the interesting portions. Of course, a hyperlink to the entire electronic counterpart of the paper document can be included with the excerpt materials.
In some embodiments, the system also stores information about the document in the Life Library, such as author, publication title, publication date, publisher, copyright holder (or copyright holder's licensing agent), ISBN, links to public annotations of the document, readrank, etc. Some of this additional information about the document is a form of paper document metadata. Third parties may create public annotation files for access by persons other than themselves, such the general public. Linking to a third party's commentary on a document is advantageous because reading annotation files of other users enhances the subscriber's understanding of the document.
In some embodiments, the system archives materials by class. This feature allows a Life Library subscriber to quickly store electronic counterparts to an entire class of paper documents without access to each paper document. For example, when the subscriber scans some text from a copy of National Geographic magazine, the system provides the subscriber with the option to archive all back issues of the National Geographic. If the subscriber elects to archive all back issues, the Life Library service provider would then verify with the National Geographic Society whether the subscriber is authorized to do so. If not, the Life Library service provider can mediate the purchase of the right to archive the National Geographic magazine collection.
16.2. Life Saver
A variation on, or enhancement of, the Life Library concept is the “Life Saver,” where the system uses the text captured by a user to deduce more about their other activities. The scanning of a menu from a particular restaurant, a program from a particular theater performance, a timetable at a particular railway station, or an article from a local newspaper allows the system to make deductions about the user's location and social activities, and could construct an automatic diary for them, for example as a website. The user would be able to edit and modify the diary, add additional materials such as photographs and, of course, look again at the items scanned.
17. Academic Applications
Portable scanners supported by the described system have many compelling uses in the academic setting. They can enhance student/teacher interaction and augment the learning experience. Among other uses, students can annotate study materials to suit their unique needs; teachers can monitor classroom performance; and teachers can automatically verify source materials cited in student assignments.
17.1. Children's Books
A child's interaction with a paper document, such as a book, is monitored by a literacy acquisition system that employs a specific set of embodiments of this system. The child uses a portable scanner that communicates with other elements of the literacy acquisition system. In addition to the portable scanner, the literacy acquisition system includes a computer having a display and speakers, and a database accessible by the computer. The scanner is coupled with the computer (hardwired, short range RF, etc.). When the child sees an unknown word in the book, the child scans it with the scanner. In one embodiment, the literacy acquisition system compares the scanned text with the resources in its database to identify the word. The database includes a dictionary, thesaurus, and/or multimedia files (e.g., sound, graphics, etc.). After the word has been identified, the system uses the computer speakers to pronounce the word and its definition to the child. In another embodiment, the word and its definition are displayed by the literacy acquisition system on the computer's monitor. Multimedia files about the scanned word can also be played through the computer's monitor and speakers. For example, if a child reading “Goldilocks and the Three Bears” scanned the word “bear,” the system might pronounce the word “bear” and play a short video about bears on the computer's monitor. In this way, the child learns to pronounce the written word and is visually taught what the word means via the multimedia presentation.
The literacy acquisition system provides immediate auditory and/or visual information to enhance the learning process. The child uses this supplementary information to quickly acquire a deeper understanding of the written material. The system can be used to teach beginning readers to read, to help children acquire a larger vocabulary, etc. This system provides the child with information about words with which the child is unfamiliar or about which the child wants more information.
17.2. Literacy Acquisition
In some embodiments, the system compiles personal dictionaries. If the reader sees a word that is new, interesting, or particularly useful or troublesome, the reader saves it (along with its definition) to a computer file. This computer file becomes the reader's personalized dictionary. This dictionary is generally smaller in size than a general dictionary so can be downloaded to a mobile station or associated device and thus be available even when the system isn't immediately accessible. In some embodiments, the personal dictionary entries include audio files to assist with proper word pronunciation and information identifying the paper document from which the word was scanned.
In some embodiments, the system creates customized spelling and vocabulary tests for students. For example, as a student reads an assignment, the student may scan unfamiliar words with the portable scanner. The system stores a list of all the words that the student has scanned. Later, the system administers a customized spelling/vocabulary test to the student on an associated monitor (or prints such a test on an associated printer).
17.3. Music Teaching
The arrangement of notes on a musical staff is similar to the arrangement of letters in a line of text. The same scanning device discussed for capturing text in this system can be used to capture music notation, and an analogous process of constructing a search against databases of known musical pieces would allow the piece from which the capture occurred to be identified which can then be retrieved, played, or be the basis for some further action.
17.4. Detecting Plagiarism
Teachers can use the system to detect plagiarism or to verify sources by scanning text from student papers and submitting the scanned text to the system. For example, a teacher who wishes to verify that a quote in a student paper came from the source that the student cited can scan a portion of the quote and compare the title of the document identified by the system with the title of the document cited by the student. Likewise, the system can use scans of text from assignments submitted as the student's original work to reveal if the text was instead copied.
17.5. Enhanced Textbook
In some embodiments, capturing text from an academic textbook links students or staff to more detailed explanations, further exercises, student and staff discussions about the material, related example past exam questions, further reading on the subject, recordings of the lectures on the subject, and so forth. (See also Section 7.1.)
17.6. Language Learning
In some embodiments, the system is used to teach foreign languages. Scanning a Spanish word, for example, might cause the word to be read aloud in Spanish along with its definition in English.
The system provides immediate auditory and/or visual information to enhance the new language acquisition process. The reader uses this supplementary information to acquire quickly a deeper understanding of the material. The system can be used to teach beginning students to read foreign languages, to help students acquire a larger vocabulary, etc. The system provides information about foreign words with which the reader is unfamiliar or for which the reader wants more information.
Reader interaction with a paper document, such as a newspaper or book, is monitored by a language skills system. The reader has a portable scanner that communicates with the language skills system. In some embodiments, the language skills system includes a computer having a display and speakers, and a database accessible by the computer. The scanner communicates with the computer (hardwired, short range RF, etc.). When the reader sees an unknown word in an article, the reader scans it with the scanner. The database includes a foreign language dictionary, thesaurus, and/or multimedia files (sound, graphics, etc.). In one embodiment, the system compares the scanned text with the resources in its database to identify the scanned word. After the word has been identified, the system uses the computer speakers to pronounce the word and its definition to the reader. In some embodiments, the word and its definition are both displayed on the computer's monitor. Multimedia files about grammar tips related to the scanned word can also be played through the computer's monitor and speakers. For example, if the words “to speak” are scanned, the system might pronounce the word “hablar,” play a short audio clip that demonstrates the proper Spanish pronunciation, and display a complete list of the various conjugations of “hablar.” In this way, the student learns to pronounce the written word, is visually taught the spelling of the word via the multimedia presentation, and learns how to conjugate the verb. The system can also present grammar tips about the proper usage of “hablar” along with common phrases.
In some embodiments, the user scans a word or short phrase from a rendered document in a language other than the user's native language (or some other language that the user knows reasonably well). In some embodiments, the system maintains a prioritized list of the user's “preferred” languages. The system identifies the electronic counterpart of the rendered document, and determines the location of the scan within the document. The system also identifies a second electronic counterpart of the document that has been translated into one of the user's preferred languages, and determines the location in the translated document corresponding to the location of the scan in the original document. When the corresponding location is not known precisely, the system identifies a small region (e.g., a paragraph) that includes the corresponding location of the scanned location. The corresponding translated location is then presented to the user. This provides the user with a precise translation of the particular usage at the scanned location, including any slang or other idiomatic usage that is often difficult to accurately translate on a word-by-word basis.
17.7. Gathering Research Materials
A user researching a particular topic may encounter all sorts of material, both in print and on screen, which they might wish to record as relevant to the topic in some personal archive. The system would enable this process to be automatic as a result of scanning a short phrase in any piece of material, and could also create a bibliography suitable for insertion into a publication on the subject.
18. Commercial Applications
Obviously, commercial activities could be made out of almost any process discussed in this document, but here we concentrate on a few obvious revenue streams.
18.1. Fee-based Searching and Indexing
Conventional Internet search engines typically provide free search of electronic documents, and also make no charge to the content providers for including their content in the index. In some embodiments, the system provides for charges to users and/or payments to search engines and/or content providers in connection with the operation and use of the system.
In some embodiments, subscribers to the system's services pay a fee for searches originating from scans of paper documents. For example, a stockbroker may be reading a Wall Street Journal article about a new product offered by Company X. By scanning the Company X name from the paper document and agreeing to pay the necessary fees, the stockbroker uses the system to search special or proprietary databases to obtain premium information about the company, such as analyst's reports. The system can also make arrangements to have priority indexing of the documents most likely to be read in paper form, for example by making sure all of the newspapers published on a particular day are indexed and available by the time they hit the streets.
Content providers may pay a fee to be associated with certain terms in search queries submitted from paper documents. For example, in one embodiment, the system chooses a most preferred content provider based on additional context about the provider (the context being, in this case, that the content provider has paid a fee to be moved up the results list). In essence, the search provider is adjusting paper document search results based on pre-existing financial arrangements with a content provider. See also the description of keywords and key phrases in Section 5.2.
Where access to particular content is to be restricted to certain groups of people (such as clients or employees), such content may be protected by a firewall and thus not generally indexable by third parties. The content provider may nonetheless wish to provide an index to the protected content. In such a case, the content provider can pay a service provider to provide the content provider's index to system subscribers. For example, a law firm may index all of a client's documents. The documents are stored behind the law firm's firewall. However, the law firm wants its employees and the client to have access to the documents through the portable scanner so it provides the index (or a pointer to the index) to the service provider, which in turn searches the law firm's index when employees or clients of the law firm submit paper-scanned search terms via their portable scanners. The law firm can provide a list of employees and/or clients to the service provider's system to enable this function or the system can verify access rights by querying the law firm prior to searching the law firm's index. Note that in the preceding example, the index provided by the law firm is only of that client's documents, not an index of all documents at the law firm. Thus, the service provider can only grant the law firm's clients access to the documents that the law firm indexed for the client.
There are at least two separate revenue streams that can result from searches originating from paper documents: one revenue stream from the search function, and another from the content delivery function. The search function revenue can be generated from paid subscriptions from the scanner users, but can also be generated on a per-search charge. The content delivery revenue can be shared with the content provider or copyright holder (the service provider can take a percentage of the sale or a fixed fee, such as a micropayment, for each delivery), but also can be generated by a “referral” model in which the system gets a fee or percentage for every item that the subscriber orders from the online catalog and that the system has delivered or contributed to, regardless of whether the service provider intermediates the transaction. In some embodiments, the system service provider receives revenue for all purchases that the subscriber made from the content provider, either for some predetermined period of time or at any subsequent time when a purchase of an identified product is made.
Consumers may use the portable scanner to make purchases from paper catalogs. The subscriber scans information from the catalog that identifies the catalog. This information is text from the catalog, a bar code, or another identifier of the catalog. The subscriber scans information identifying the products that s/he wishes to purchase. The catalog mailing label may contain a customer identification number that identifies the customer to the catalog vendor. If so, the subscriber can also scan this customer identification number. The system acts as an intermediary between the subscriber and the vendor to facilitate the catalog purchase by providing the customer's selection and customer identification number to the vendor.
A consumer scans paper coupons and saves an electronic copy of the coupon in the scanner, or in a remote device such as a computer, for later retrieval and use. An advantage of electronic storage is that the consumer is freed from the burden of carrying paper coupons. A further advantage is that the electronic coupons may be retrieved from any location. In some embodiments, the system can track coupon expiration dates, alert the consumer about coupons that will expire soon, and/or delete expired coupons from storage. An advantage for the issuer of the coupons is the possibility of receiving more feedback about who is using the coupons and when and where they are captured and used.
19. General Applications
The system may be used to auto-populate an electronic document that corresponds to a paper form. A user scans in some text or a barcode that uniquely identifies the paper form. The scanner communicates the identity of the form and information identifying the user to a nearby computer. The nearby computer has an Internet connection. The nearby computer can access a first database of forms and a second database having information about the user of the scanner (such as a service provider's subscriber information database). The nearby computer accesses an electronic version of the paper form from the first database and auto-populates the fields of the form from the user's information obtained from the second database. The nearby computer then emails the completed form to the intended recipient. Alternatively, the computer could print the completed form on a nearby printer.
Rather than access an external database, in some embodiments, the system has a portable scanner that contains the user's information, such as in an identity module, SIM, or security card. The scanner provides information identifying the form to the nearby PC. The nearby PC accesses the electronic form and queries the scanner for any necessary information to fill out the form.
19.2. Business Cards
The system can be used to automatically populate electronic address books or other contact lists from paper documents. For example, upon receiving a new acquaintance's business card, a user can capture an image of the card with his/her cellular phone. The system will locate an electronic copy of the card, which can be used to update the cellular phone's onboard address book with the new acquaintance's contact information. The electronic copy may contain more information about the new acquaintance than can be squeezed onto a business card. Further, the onboard address book may also store a link to the electronic copy such that any changes to the electronic copy will be automatically updated in the cell phone's address book. In this example, the business card optionally includes a symbol or text that indicates the existence of an electronic copy. If no electronic copy exists, the cellular phone can use OCR and knowledge of standard business card formats to fill out an entry in the address book for the new acquaintance. Symbols may also aid in the process of extracting information directly from the image. For example, a phone icon next to the phone number on the business card can be recognized to determine the location of the phone number.
The system can enhance the proofreading and editing process. One way the system can enhance the editing process is by linking the editor's interactions with a paper document to its electronic counterpart. As an editor reads a paper document and scans various parts of the document, the system will make the appropriate annotations or edits to an electronic counterpart of the paper document. For example, if the editor scans a portion of text and makes the “new paragraph” control gesture with the scanner, a computer in communication with the scanner would insert a “new paragraph” break at the location of the scanned text in the electronic copy of the document.
19.4. Voice Annotation
A user can make voice annotations to a document by scanning a portion of text from the document and then making a voice recording that is associated with the scanned text. In some embodiments, the scanner has a microphone to record the user's verbal annotations. After the verbal annotations are recorded, the system identifies the document from which the text was scanned, locates the scanned text within the document, and attaches the voice annotation at that point. In some embodiments, the system converts the speech to text and attaches the annotation as a textual comment.
In some embodiments, the system keeps annotations separate from the document, with only a reference to the annotation kept with the document. The annotations then become an annotation markup layer to the document for a specific subscriber or group of users.
In some embodiments, for each capture and associated annotation, the system identifies the document, opens it using a software package, scrolls to the location of the scan and plays the voice annotation. The user can then interact with a document while referring to voice annotations, suggested changes or other comments recorded either by themselves or by somebody else.
19.5. Help in Text
The described system can be used to enhance paper documents with electronic help menus. In some embodiments, a markup layer associated with a paper document contains help menu information for the document. For example, when a user scans text from a certain portion of the document, the system checks the markup associated with the document and presents a help menu to the user. The help menu is presented on a display on the scanner or on an associated nearby display.
19.6. Use with Displays
In some situations, it is advantageous to be able to scan information from a television, computer monitor, or other similar display. In some embodiments, the portable scanner is used to scan information from computer monitors and televisions. In some embodiments, the portable optical scanner has an illumination sensor that is optimized to work with traditional cathode ray tube (CRT) display techniques such as rasterizing, screen blanking, etc.
A voice capture device which operates by capturing audio of the user reading text from a document will typically work regardless of whether that document is on paper, on a display, or on some other medium.
19.6.1. Public Kiosks and Dynamic Session IDs
One use of the direct scanning of displays is the association of devices as described in Section 15.6. For example, in some embodiments, a public kiosk displays a dynamic session ID on its monitor. The kiosk is connected to a communication network such as the Internet or a corporate intranet. The session ID changes periodically but at least every time that the kiosk is used so that a new session ID is displayed to every user. To use the kiosk, the subscriber scans in the session ID displayed on the kiosk; by scanning the session ID, the user tells the system that he wishes to temporarily associate the kiosk with his scanner for the delivery of content resulting from scans of printed documents or from the kiosk screen itself. The scanner may communicate the Session ID and other information authenticating the scanner (such as a serial number, account number, or other identifying information) directly to the system. For example, the scanner can communicate directly (where “directly” means without passing the message through the kiosk) with the system by sending the session initiation message through the user's cell phone (which is paired with the user's scanner via Bluetooth™). Alternatively, the scanner can establish a wireless link with the kiosk and use the kiosk's communication link by transferring the session initiation information to the kiosk (perhaps via short range RF such as Bluetooth™, etc.); in response, the kiosk sends the session initiation information to the system via its Internet connection.
The system can prevent others from using a device that is already associated with a scanner during the period (or session) in which the device is associated with the scanner. This feature is useful to prevent others from using a public kiosk before another person's session has ended. As an example of this concept related to use of a computer at an Internet café, the user scans a barcode on a monitor of a PC which s/he desires to use; in response, the system sends a session ID to the monitor that it displays; the user initiates the session by scanning the session ID from the monitor (or entering it via a keypad or touch screen or microphone on the portable scanner); and the system associates in its databases the session ID with the serial number (or other identifier that uniquely identifies the user's scanner) of his/her scanner so another scanner cannot scan the session ID and use the monitor during his/her session. The scanner is in communication (through wireless link such as Bluetooth™, a hardwired link such as a docking station, etc.) with a PC associated with the monitor or is in direct (i.e., w/o going through the PC) communication with the system via another means such as a cellular phone, etc.
In this description, reference is made to the accompanying drawings that form a part hereof wherein like numerals designate like parts throughout, and in which are shown, by way of illustration, specific embodiments in which the invention may be practiced. It is to be understood that other embodiments may be utilized and structural or logical changes may be made without departing from the scope of the present invention. Therefore, the following detailed description is not to be taken in a limiting sense, and the scope of the present invention is defined by the appended claims and their equivalents.
Various embodiments include a user-friendly technique for filling forms (such as forms on paper, in catalogs, displayed on web pages, other dynamic displays, in advertisements, in books, in magazines, on signs and the like) using a graphical capture device (such as a scanner, digital camera, or other device capable of capturing at least a portion of the rendered form) or other devices. Embodiments may be practiced to engage in many forms of information gathering utilizing a device to interface with human and machine-readable materials.
In this description, various aspects of selected embodiments are described. However, it will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art and others that alternate embodiments may be practiced with only some or all of the aspects. For purposes of explanation, specific numbers, materials and configurations are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the embodiments. However, it will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art and others that alternate embodiments may be practiced without the specific details. In other instances, well-known features are omitted or simplified in order not to obscure the illustrated embodiments.
Various operations may be described herein as multiple discreet steps in turn, in a manner that is helpful to understanding of the embodiments. However, the order of description should not be construed to imply that these operations are necessarily order dependent. In particular, these operations may not be performed in the order of presentation.
The phrase “in one embodiment” is used repeatedly. The phrase generally does not refer to the same embodiment, however, it may. The terms “comprising,” “having” and “including” are synonymous, unless the context dictates otherwise.
Referring now to
In various embodiments, the scanning device 302, 500, computer 212, mobile phone or PDA 216, user account services 236, document sources 234, recipient device 450, form registry 600 and IVR server 460 are coupled to each other wirelessly, i.e., they are members of a wireless network 430. In other embodiments, the scanning device 302, 500, computer 212, mobile phone or PDA 216, user account services 236, document sources 234, recipient device 450, form registry 600 and IVR server 460 are coupled to each other as members of a wire-based or mixed wireless and wire-based network (e.g., as in the Internet 410). Regardless of the manner the devices are coupled to each other, for various embodiments, scanning device 302, 500, computer 212, mobile phone or PDA 216, user account services 236, document sources 234, recipient device 450, form registry 600 and IVR server 460 are each equipped to operate in accordance with at least one communication transaction protocol. In various embodiments, scanning device 302, 500, computer 212, mobile phone or PDA 216 and telephone 465 may be wholly or partially integrated. Thus, the terms scanning device and computer, mobile phone, PDA and telephone, as used herein, for the purpose of this specification, including the claims, shall be interpreted with the meaning of an appropriately equipped device, operating in accordance with one or more of the scanning device 302, 500, computer 212, mobile phone or PDA 216 and telephone roles.
Additionally, in various embodiments, computer 212 and user account services 236 may be wholly or partially integrated. Thus, the terms computer and user account services, as used herein, for the purpose of this specification, including the claims, shall be interpreted with the meaning of an appropriately equipped device, operating in accordance with either a user computer or an account server role. It may be useful for a user to have field data on file so that some or all of the fields of a form may be submitted without a user having to input data when a form is encountered. This may be helpful with especially common data elements such as name, address, phone number, e-mail address, social security number, driver's license number, date of birth or other possible identifier. Less common fields, such as parent's name, date of high school graduation, astrological sign, registered political party, financial or medical information or other personal information, may also be stored within one or more devices within the system 400 and optionally made available to complete forms.
The scanning device 302, 500 also includes a processing unit 510, a display 540, a graphical input 525, an optional audio input 545, an optional user input interface 535 and a memory 550, all interconnected along with the communications interface 530 via a bus 520. The memory 550 generally comprises a random access memory (“RAM”), a read only memory (“ROM”) and a permanent mass storage device, such as a disk drive, flash RAM or the like. The memory 550 stores an operating system 555, form processing routine 560, field data 565 and device identifier 570. In alternate embodiments, bus 520 may be a hierarchy of bridged buses. For ease of understanding, operating system 555, form processing routine 560, field data 565 and device identifier(s) 570 are illustrated as separate software components, in alternate embodiments, they may be comprised of multiple software components, implemented in hardware, or may be subparts of one or more integrated software components.
In one embodiment, the form processing routine 560 is adapted to process graphically captured portions of a form 495. In various embodiments, a form 495 may be any rendered version of human readable text and or images that is susceptible to graphical capture by a scanning device 302, 500. Exemplary, non-limiting example of rendered forms 495 include materials from, but not limited to, paper catalogs, magazines, books, printed text, television or computer displays, posters, signs and the like. In various embodiments, form processing routine 560 may simply be an analog to digital converter where graphically captured information from the graphical input 525 is stored as form data.
Various embodiments may employ scanning devices 500 having enhanced capabilities to allow still further transactions. For example, in one such embodiment, scanning device 302, 500 comprises Global Positioning System (“GPS”) circuitry or other positioning circuitry (not shown), thereby enabling transactions based on the geographic location of the graphical capture of a rendered form.
In alternate embodiments, form processing routine 560 may include enhanced image analysis. For example, form processing routine 560 may process graphically captured information from the graphical input 525 to extract image information. One possible form of form processing may include determining the position, orientation and size of elements of a pattern in an image (such as text or other human readable symbols).
Another form of form processing may include identifying differences between an image and a stored pattern. Methods for identifying these differences are generally referred to as pattern inspection methods and may be used for a number of purposes. One early, widely used method for pattern location and inspection is known as blob analysis. In this method, the pixels of a digital image are classified as “object” or “background,” typically by comparing pixel gray-levels to a threshold. Pixels classified as object are grouped into blobs using the rule that two object pixels are part of the same blob if they are neighbors; this is known as connectivity analysis. Each such blob is analyzed to determine properties such as area, perimeter, center of mass, principal moments of inertia, principal axes of inertia and the like. In one specific implementation, the position, orientation and size of a blob are taken to be its center of mass, angle of first principal axis of inertia, and area, respectively. These and the other blob properties can be compared against a known ideal for proposes of inspection. Blob analysis is relatively inexpensive to compute, allowing for fast operation on inexpensive hardware.
Another form processing method that may be employed by form processing routine 260 is template matching. Template matching uses one or more training images that contain examples of the patterns to be located. The subset of the training image containing the example is processed to produce a pattern and then stored in a memory. Images are presented that may contain the object to be found. The stored pattern is compared with like-sized subsets of the presented images at all or selected positions and the position(s) that best match the stored pattern may then be considered the position(s) of the object. Degree of match at a given position of the pattern is simply the proportion of pattern pixels that match their corresponding image pixel, thereby providing pattern inspection information. In some embodiments, template matching may be employed to locate electronic instances of forms as described below.
Template matching may be applied to a variety of form processing analyses. It also is able to tolerate missing or extra pattern features without severe loss of accuracy, and it is able to detect fine differences between the pattern and the object.
A further alternate form of form processing is the use of gray-level normalized correlation for pattern location and inspection. Gray-level normalized correlation and template matching are similar, except that the full range of image gray-levels are considered with gray-level normalized correlation, and the degree of match becomes the correlation coefficient between the stored pattern and the image subset at a given position.
Gray-level correlation may be used in applications where significant variation in orientation and/or size is expected. Accordingly, the stored pattern is rotated and/or scaled by digital image re-sampling methods before being matched against the image. By matching over a range of angles, sizes and x-y positions, one can locate an object in the corresponding multidimensional space.
Still further versions of form processing routine 560 may include conventional Optical Character Recognition (“OCR”) processing to extract textual and/or symbolic information from a graphically captured portion of a rendered form 495.
While the form processing routine 560 is described as residing on the scanning device 302, 500, in alternate embodiments, form processing routine 560 may optionally reside on other devices of the operating environment 400, such as the computer 212, mobile phone or PDA 216 or document sources 234.
It will be appreciated that the software components of scanning device 302, 500 may be loaded from a computer readable medium into memory 550 of the scanning device 302, 500 using a mechanism (not shown) associated with the computer readable medium such as a floppy, tape, DVD (Digital Versatile Disk) drive, CD (Compact Disk) drive, flash RAM or communications interface 530. In various embodiments, the loading may be performed during the manufacturing of scanning device 302, 500, or subsequently. In other embodiments, the software components may be downloaded from one or more networked servers.
In various embodiments, the communications interface 530 may facilitate the connection of remote devices to the scanning device 302, 500; for example, devices for reading and/or writing in machine readable media, digital cameras, printers and the like. Various user-input interfaces 535 may also be coupled to the scanning device 302, 500, such as, for example, keyboards, keypads, touch-pads, mice and the like.
The form registry 600 also includes a processing unit 610, an optional display 640 and a memory 650, all interconnected along with the communications interface 630 via a bus 620. The memory 650 generally comprises RAM, ROM and a permanent mass storage device, such as a disk drive, flash RAM or the like. The memory 650 stores an operating system 655, form matching routine 1200, form entry routine 1400 and forms database 675.
In alternate embodiments, bus 620 may be a hierarchy of bridged buses. For ease of understanding, operating system 655, form matching routine 1200, form entry routine 1400 and forms database 675 are illustrated as separate software components; in alternate embodiments, they may be comprised of multiple software components, implemented in hardware, or may be subparts of one or more integrated software components.
In one embodiment, the forms database 675 contains form information corresponding to form 495. The form registry 600 uses the forms database 675 to correlate operations to a form 495 with an electronic instance of the form.
It will be appreciated that the software components may be loaded from a computer readable medium into memory 650 of the form registry 600 using a mechanism (not shown) associated with the computer readable medium such as a floppy, tape, DVD drive, CD drive, flash RAM or communications interface 630. In various embodiments, the loading may be performed during the manufacturing of device 600, or subsequently. In other embodiments, the software components may be downloaded from one or more networked servers.
In various embodiments, the communications interface 630 may facilitate the connection of remote devices to the form registry 600; for example, devices for reading and/or writing in machine readable media, digital cameras, printers and the like. Various input mechanisms may also be coupled to the form registry 600, such as, for example, keyboards, keypads, touch-pads, mice and the like (not shown).
In various embodiments, an electronic instance of a form may be located for, and associated with form 495. In one such embodiment, the form 495 is associated with a form identifier. A form identifier may be an explicit identifier or may be a derived identifier from the contents of the form itself. In some embodiments, various types of explicit form identifiers may be used to distinguish forms. The type of form may determine the choice of the type of identifier used. The generation and assignment of the identifiers may follow industry standard practices. Accordingly, in some embodiment it may be desirable that form identifiers are unique for a form (or group of forms). One method for generating form identifiers is to take a title and append a random number (e.g., “Tax-Form-1040-5435873934”). Another method is to generate a Globally Unique Identifier (“GUID”) using conventional algorithms. The location of form identifier generation may be at any of a variety of devices in the operating environment 400, such as user account services 236, scanning device 302, 500, computer 212, mobile phone or PDA 216, form registry 600 and the like. The appropriate form identifier may be generated on demand or may be predetermined. Furthermore, form identifiers may comprise supplemental information associated with a specific form or even a specific instance of a form.
Derived identifiers may be determined from the contents of a form 495. One type of derived form identifier is a digest of one or more fragments (e.g., title, form text, form fields, names or the like) of the form 495. In some such embodiments, electronic instances and forms 495 contain substantially the same content. However, an electronic instance may or may not be the actual source form employed to generate form 495. In other words, an electronic instance may be a copy instance or cousin descendant instance from a common ancestor of the source document employed to generate form 495. Further, various embodiments anticipate that the form 495 may be a form of any type, and the term “form,” as used herein, includes but is not limited to, a printed version, a displayed version, a Braille version and other versions of the like of a form. The term “digest” (of a form fragment) as used herein, in the specification and later in the claims, refers to a derived result outputted from a process that includes acquiring information or knowledge of the form fragment, where the derived result comprises information about the form fragment. In other words, a digest may also be considered as a representation or specification of the form fragment.
In various embodiments, each form fragment includes a number of characters, and the corresponding digest is generated based at least in part on the characters of the form fragment. The term “character” as used herein is intended to be broadly interpreted, encompassing alphabets, numerals, punctuation, symbols and glyphs of non-character based languages. As will be described in further detail below, in various embodiments, each digest may be generated without awareness of the language and/or the character/glyph set employed to express the content of the form, including the form fragment itself. Further, an electronic instance may be located employing a digest generated using a relatively short form fragment, as short as a handful of words.
In one embodiment, the scanning device 302, 500 is suitably equipped to generate at least a representation of a form fragment of the form 495. For embodiments where form 495 is a printed instance, scanning device 302, 500 may be an optical scanner unit capable of generating at least an image of the form fragment.
In other embodiments, scanning device 302, 500 may be further endowed with the ability to generate a digest of a form fragment, using the generated image of the form fragment.
In various embodiments, an electronic instance may be located and associated with a form 495, based at least in part on the digest of a fragment of the form 495.
In further embodiments, the content/characters of a form fragment, may be determined from its digest, and may be used to cause an electronic instance to be located.
In various embodiments, an electronic instance may be located, and associated with form 495, by providing an image of a form fragment to search service, or by causing a search query having either a digest or the determined contents/characters as the search criteria, to be submitted to a search service (not shown). Resultantly, an electronic instance may be located, and associated with a form 495.
The process of generating a digest for a form fragment, in accordance with various embodiments may be practiced by scanner device 500 or other devices such as computer 212 or mobile phone or PDA 216. Further, for these embodiments, the content, more specifically, the characters, of a form fragment may be analyzed without awareness of the language and/or the character set employed to express the content of the form 495, including the form fragment.
Locating an electronic instance of a form involves abstractedly identifying the characters of form fragment. The phrase “abstractedly identifying the characters” as used herein, is intended to include in its meaning “the identification of the presence of the various characters in the form fragment, without precisely recognizing the nature of the characters.” For example, when processing a form fragment having the content “this is a string of characters”, the process identifies the presence of 25 characters (not counting spaces), of which, 12 are distinct, i.e., “t”, “h”, “i”, “s”, “a”, “r”, “n”, “g”, “o”, “f”, “c”, “e”, but, the process does not recognize the exact nature of the distinct characters, i.e., they are “s”, “t”, and so forth.
In various embodiments, the presence of the various characters is identified by comparing an image of the form fragment with a replicate of the image (also referred to as the template). In various embodiments, the process may also include pre-processing of the received image of form fragment, removing extraneous information, e.g., all or portions of the characters of the line above and/or the line below. Removal of such extraneous information may be effectuated employing anyone of a number of image/text processing techniques.
In various embodiments, identification of the presence of various characters in form fragment is effectuated by incrementally comparing the ending characters of form fragment with the beginning characters of form fragment. The process may be visualized as sliding a template along from the beginning to the end of the form fragment and comparing the overlapping sections of form fragment and the template. Resultantly, the character “s” is first compared to the letter “t”, then the letters “rs” are compared to the letters “th”, and so forth.
Eventually, when the letters “characters” are compared to the letters “this is a s”, the presence of the letter “s” is identified. Again, the fact that the character is the alphabetic “s” is not appreciated, nor is the appreciation necessary. However, of course, in alternate embodiments, the alphabetic nature of characters appreciated.
For various embodiments, on identification of the presence of a new character (again without appreciating the nature of the new character), a token is assigned to identify the new character. Thus, for the example form fragment “This is a string of characters”, the characters are identified by corresponding token tokens or token identifiers.
For various embodiments, the presence of the characters “e”, “f”, “o”, “g” and “n” are substantially identified at the same time, when the entire form fragment is compared to template. For some embodiments, white space analysis is further performed at the end of the comparison analysis, to ensure the characters within a non-repeating pair or multiple characters, such as “o” and “f” in the case of “of”, are recognized as separate characters, although again they need not be fully recognized as the alphabet “o” or “f”. For some embodiments, tokens for the last characters detected are simply assigned tokens without recognizing the nature of each of the characters.
Thus, for the example form fragment, tokenization results in the generation of the token vector of “5261 61 4 1536CB A9 7243475831” as “this is a string of characters” is compared to it template as described above.
Next, for various embodiments, an analysis is performed using the token vector to generate a digest comprised of presence characters. A value is assigned to each presence character, based at least in part on its occurrence pattern. For the embodiments, the re-occurrence value is equal to the character distance between a token, and its first subsequent re-occurrence in the remainder of the token vector. Further, for the embodiments, a presence character is attributed with a value of zero if it does not re-occur in the remainder of the token vector. Finally, the digest is outputted for the form fragment. Accordingly, for the exemplary form fragment “this is a string of characters”, its digest is given by a vector “0, 20, 3, 3, 3, 8, 4, 7, 14, 7, 19, 15, 11, 0, 0, 0, 3, 0, 0, 0, 5, 0, 2, 5, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0.”
In alternate embodiments, various modifications may be made to generate digests. For examples, the occurrence values may be attributed without first tokenizing the characters. Another value other than “0” may be attributed to a character, if the character does not reoccur in the remainder of the form fragment. Hexadecimal values A, B etc. may be employed. More complex, non-linear value attribution approach may be employed instead. The attributed value may be based on other factors beside the re-occurrence of the character. Space may be included as a character. Further, as described earlier, other techniques to recognize the nature of the characters may be employed. Yet further, the process may be modified to analyze and assign attributes to the characters, abstractedly, by groups of characters having two or more characters.
In some embodiments, the scanning device 302, 500 initiates a form filling transaction involving the form registry 600 by scanning a portion of a rendered form 495.
In some embodiments, rendering the form may comprise displaying the form on a dynamic display, while in other embodiments, rendering the form may comprise printing the form.
In various embodiments, the communications described above and shown in
Similarly, while the form filling is shown as occurring in a series of steps, it may occur in other sequences, and the steps may occur after protracted periods. In one “asynchronous” example, a user may graphically capture a form fragment as a form context and may also capture a form fragment including a desired item, but not transmit the graphically captured form fragments until a later point in time. Such asynchronous communications allow users of various embodiments to practice the embodiments, even when not connected to a network.
For example when a user is not connected to a network, and a scanning device 302, 500 does not have information about this user's context (e.g., location, time of day, recent forms viewed, recently viewed documents, occupation and any of a myriad of other contextual clues that may be used to provide context to a user's action), or when a user does not have access to a display—then resolving questions about which form was actually scanned can be resolved at a later time. Accordingly, a form-submission process might be finished by directing a user to a web site later, or by sending them an e-mail that requests further action—possibly confirming by clicking on or otherwise following a hyperlink. Such an e-mail-based completion process might also include an explanation or list of data items being requested.
Expanding briefly on user context, in some embodiments a user's context is tracked rigorously to aid in resolving ambiguous form selections. For example, if a user (form filler) submits a positively identifier form from a particular magazine, then an ambiguously matched form that also appears in the same magazine may be given a higher priority as a likely correct choice. Similarly, if a user located in London scans a form that ambiguously matches both an American form and a British form, the British form will be given precedence. Likewise, if the user owns a boat, but not an airplane, and one of the ambiguously matched forms relates to boats and another to airplanes, priority may be given to the form relating to boats when disambiguating between the two forms. These are merely illustrative and non-limiting examples of how user context may be used to resolve ambiguous matches between forms.
In some embodiments, form submission communications are performed over connections using a Hypertext Transfer Protocol (“HTTP”) connection in communication with one or more Common Gateway Interface (“CGI”) or other HTTP-accessible applications. In other embodiments, different transmission protocols and/or connections for form submissions may be employed. Various types of form submission protocols are anticipated being employed by various embodiments.
In general, a form submission contains the information necessary to identify the form 495 and field data for filling one or more form fields. This may be accomplished by a variety of different form models in accordance with various embodiments.
In accordance with the above-described communications between scanning device 302, 500, computer 212 and form registry 600,
Assuming the form is complete, and processing has proceeded to decision block 835, a determination is made whether the form should be printed. If so, processing proceeds to block 840 where the form is printed. If however in decision block 835 it was determined that the form should not be printed (or after printing the form), processing proceeds to decision block 845 where a determination is made whether to submit (e.g., via e-mail, HTTP, facsimile or other electronic submission, or via other methods, such a postal mail or courier delivery) the form to a recipient. Such a determination may be selected by a user, or may be predetermined by defaults or a user's previous actions.
If in decision block 845 it is determined to submit the form to a recipient than processing proceeds to block 850 after which form filling routine 800 ends. If however in decision block 845 it was determined not to submit the form to a recipient processing proceeds to block 899 where the form filling routine 800 ends.
Optionally, a user may request that a particular form, or a field data request which a form represents, be presented or delivered in another fashion. For example, a user might request that a separate paper copy of a form be mailed to their home or work address, that information shown on a form be requested via an email, or that a URL identifying a web-based version of this form be sent to this user by email other methods.
In various embodiments, when a user scans a form, e.g., by scanning a form identifier or other identifying text or marking, the user may be presented with options. This presentation may occur later, for example when this user connects to a user account (e.g., on user account services 236), or when they check their email or a website. Options available to a user might include:
Furthermore, in some embodiments, a user may be presented with feedback (audible, visual, tactile or the like) while obtaining form identifiers. For example, in one exemplary embodiment, if a form 495 unambiguously matched from a form identifier, a first light emitting diode (“LED”) may light up. Additional, when a user scans a form field within the form 495, a second LED may light up once the scanning device 302, 500 (either alone or in combination with one or more other devices within the system 100) determines the scanned location within the form 495. Likewise, other indicators may be employed to indicate that a form was not unambiguously identifier.
In assorted embodiments, various type of forms may be encountered by a user, and optionally processed in some way by different embodiments, a non-exclusive listing might include forms for:
Note that a scanning device 302, 500 or account might be associated with a group of people (e.g., a club, a company, or other association).
The description of an item ordering transaction illustrated in
The communications described above and shown in
In some embodiments, there may be a fee or other financial transaction associated with various steps of completing a form. For example, a user might receive a charge for this service. Such a charge might be automatically billed to a credit card or deducted from a debit card or bank account or prepaid account associated with a particular user, with a scanning device 302, 500 or with a location. Alternately, such a charge might be levied on and paid by a recipient of this information or a party in association with them.
In one embodiment, a user may complete a part of a form or an entire form simply by scanning (or otherwise entering) an identifier associated with this form. In some cases a form identifier may also be readable by a human, for example as a serial number or URL, so that users who cannot or do not want to graphically capture a form may still complete it by entering an identifier manually. In these instances, it may be helpful if a form or accompanying material includes information about how to submit data by other methods. Such methods may include going to a specific URL with a web-browser. Another may be via a phone call to a specific number and an interaction with an IVR server 460. These last two examples indicate how it may be useful in some cases for individuals to have a way to identify themselves separately from a scanning device 302, 500. Such a user identifier may associate an individual with a collection of data so that an individual may respond to or complete all or part of a particular field data request by submitting or relating only their identifier. In one example, a user could respond to a printed form by dialing a number associated with this form and then entering their (possibly numeric) identifier via voice or DTMF or other phone commands or actions. In one embodiment, a user might be able to use their email address, social security number, or other pre-existing data item as a key associated with data to be submitted with a form.
In another embodiment, a user may complete a rendered form using auto-complete capabilities of a web browser. In this situation, a user may browse to a website where they can enter a form identifier. Optionally, a form or associated materials may indicate a URL or other web address that a user may use to locate and connect to a correct form-completion service. For example, such a form might indicate, “To complete this form online go to www.formfill.com/ID2372893.” Such a system then might present this user's browser (or any tool capable of completing a web-based—e.g., HTML—form) with an HTML or other web-based version of this form, which can then be completed manually (e.g., with keyboard and mouse), and/or with auto-fill, if desired, and submitted electronically by a user (e.g., by clicking on a submit button with a computer mouse). Here, it may be helpful for forms that are enabled for this auto-completion service to carry a specific mark indicating this fact, and optionally an indication of the form's identity and/or an internet location for a completion service for the form.
In accordance with the above description and the interactions shown between a scanning device 302, 500, form registry 600, user account services 236 and recipient device 450 in
Assuming the form is complete, and processing has proceeded to block 1140, the form is submitted to a form recipient (e.g., recipient device 450). Optionally, processing proceeds to block 1145 where a record of the form submission is submitted to an account (e.g., on user account services 236). Processing of the form filling routine 1100 ends in block 1199.
In alternate embodiments, a user with a scanning device 302, 500 may optionally enter selected fields or groups of fields by individually scanning field labels (or symbols) or title text associated with a fields. This might allow a user to choose which items to submit and which to skip. Required items may carry visible and/or machine-readable indications of their required status (not shown). A suitable system may have an ability to recognize various frequently used field names, titles and/or symbols. Optionally, an association between a title or other mark and a meaning of a particular field or group of fields may be separately established by a party setting up a form.
In some cases, special marks may accompany fields, field names, or other entities that forms system 400 may want or need to recognize. These marks may be recognizable by a scanning device and or other device within the system 400. Optionally the special marks may have characteristics recognizable by a user. In some embodiments, only these special marks will need to be scanned to indicate an item or object to file all or part of a form. In some cases it may be helpful if these marks appear next to or near a given field name.
The descriptions of form filling transactions illustrated in
In some embodiments, the form recipient (e.g., user of recipient device 450) does not register, provide or accept electronic instances of forms. Instead, a third-party (not shown) acts as a form remailer. Accordingly, the form remailer takes the place of the recipient device 450 as a recipient, but forwards the form on to the form recipient in the format desired by the form recipient. For example, this would allow a newspaper to accept electronic form submissions to classified ad forms, but would then provide e-mail responses to the classified advertisers. This way the readers of the classifieds can still submit electronic forms, and the forms recipients can still receive e-mailed versions of the submitted field data (and forms) without having to provide an e-mail account or to provide a server with which to host form filling activities. In further embodiments, remailers may send postal form submissions or other formats of submissions.
If, in decision block 1215, no form matching the explicit form identifier was available or if no unambiguous match was determined in decision block 1230, processing proceeds to block 1240 where additional form context information is obtained. For example, a user may be queried for additional information from the form in real-time, or may have a query for additional information sent to an associated user account (e.g., on user account services 236). Processing then proceeds to block 1225 for re-analysis.
If, however, in decision block 1215 a form matching the explicit form identifier was located, processing proceeds to block 1220, where the matching form is obtained. Processing then ends in block 1299.
In addition to locating and obtaining forms, various embodiments locate specific field data for populating forms. Optionally, a password, PIN or other private code may be associated with a user's identifier. For example, a user might place a telephone call to a phone number associated with a data request or form, enter their social security number to identify themselves, and then be prompted for and enter their PIN or password to confirm their identity.
Additionally, stored field data might be located on a scanning device 302, 500, or other device associated with an individual user (such as computer 212 or user account services 236). Data may be stored encrypted, and/or with other security measures to prevent theft and/or accidental release of data.
In one embodiment, different types of data may be handled differently. A user's data may, for example, be grouped into classes or categories. These groups might optionally have names or titles, such as, for example, “level-1, level-2, level-3,” or possibly “very private, semi-private, public.” Optionally, certain types of data may be flagged for special processing. For example, when a form requests or requires a social security number, a specific authorization might be required by a user. A specific handling of each element of field data in a form-submission process might be specified by a user, by system defaults, or by another method.
Field data release authorization may comprise any form of authentication and or authorization process suitable for a form filler to grant permission for the release of restricted field data. In one exemplary embodiment, the authorization involves a personal identification number (“PIN”) code entry. In an alternate embodiment, a specific symbol or code is graphically captured by a scanning device 302, 500. These examples are merely illustrative, and in other embodiment, still further authorization techniques may be used.
Once field data release authorization has been obtained, field data request processing routine 1300 proceeds to looping block 1325, which begins a loop for each restricted data field in the request. Next, in block 1330 a restricted data field is compared with the field data release authorization. If in decision block 1335 it is determined that the compared data field is authorized for release, then in block 1340 field data for that data field is stored for release. Processing then proceeds to looping block 1345 where processing cycles back to looping block 1325 until all restricted data fields have been processed. If in decision block 1335 it is determined that the compared data field is not authorized for release, processing proceeds directly to looping block 1345.
Next, in decision block 1350 a determination is made whether there is any unrestricted field data. If so, then processing proceeds to block 1355 where the unrestricted data is stored for delivery. If not, or after the unrestricted field data has been stored, processing proceeds to return block 1399 where any stored data (restricted and/or unrestricted) is returned to the requester of the field data.
A user might establish data-handling procedures via a set of rules or options. One such rule might be “only submit level-2 and higher data to organizations having a privacy rating of at least 3.” Another rule might be “always contact me via phone call to confirm a request for my social security number.” Another rule might be “always send me an email record showing all data submitted to a form recipient.” Another rule might be “enter each data submission into my chronological log of data releases.” Rules for directing email in common personal computer email clients are an example of how rules may be employed to customize a system or determine system behavior for an individual user.
Note that in some embodiments scanning a form identifier conveys that a user specifically wants information sent—e.g., this user is giving consent. In such a case one or more devices within a forms system 400 may make a record of this scan, for example by preserving a captured image, time, date, or other meta-data, from this event as proof of consent. In some cases, a form identifier may include supplemental information that in some measure verifies that a user scanned a form. In one embodiment, the supplemental information might be a unique code associated with each individual form 495. This code might be associated with a specific form mailed or otherwise delivered to a specific individual. This code might optionally only be readable by a machine programmed with specific data or a specific algorithm.
For example, a form may carry additional coded, machine-readable or human-readable data. This data might include a specific user for whom this form was intended. Such additional data may be incorporated in a form identifier such that this additional data is included when a user scans the form identifier. Optionally, a form or group of forms may have a unique form identifier. Data may be separately associated with this identifier. Such data might be stored in a form registry 600 or stored elsewhere within the forms system 400. If a form is registered with a form registry 600, such data might be entered and/or associated with a form when the form is registered.
Once the form has been analyzed, a form identifier is assigned to (or derived from) the form in block 1430. The form is registered in the form registry (e.g., form registry 600) with its identifier.
In some embodiments, if a user encounters a form not known to a form registry 600, they might mail, fax, email or otherwise deliver this form so that it may be filled out. The form registry may optionally contain expert knowledge and instructions for automatically analyzing and recognizing various elements commonly used on forms. Thus, a new form may be analyzed and made available to be automatically filled out if subsequent users request it.
In some embodiments, the first user to submit a copy of a form previously unknown to a form registry 600 may be rewarded in some way, for example by receiving a small payment when subsequent users interact with this form, or by not having to pay a fee to have the form filled. In some systems, these incentive payments might instead appear as credits to form authors or publishers who submit and/or register their form directly with a form registry 600 before a user submits it—for example, these credits might be used to reduce a per-user charge that registered form publishers may be assessed for use of this system.
In one embodiment, a registry or database of form images may be created. When a user of this forms system encounters a printed or otherwise rendered form, they may request that this forms system complete this form for them. This user's data necessary to complete this form might be transmitted to this forms system at the time of this request, or, in another of many embodiments, this user's data might already be on file within this forms system, in which case this user may only need to identify themselves to this forms system, for example by submitting a user ID, and password or PIN.
Similarly, such simplified forms may allow users who encounter missing complete forms to still submit this same data. For example, a tear-out form in a magazine might have an accompanying description and/or identifier, either of which might be recognized by a scanning device, even after this accompanying form was removed. Such a description or form identifier might, for instance, be printed on a tab remaining in a magazine insert after a form had been removed. Alternatively, a description or other identifier might be printed nearby, for example on a nearby page.
In one illustrative example of the operation of an embodiment, a user scans catalog form identifier (possibly the customer number or catalog number) using a scanner device. The form identifier data is processed at a form registry 600 to locate an electronic instance of the catalog. Next, the user scans an item number, such an item number “789321” corresponding to item 1810G (a refurbished iBook computer). The item number scan identifies the item to be ordered within the electronic instance of the catalog. A recipient device 450 (probably corresponding to the catalog supplier) is notified of an order for item 1810G (a refurbished iBook computer with item number “789321”). By using the two stage (form identifier and item) scanning, the number of ambiguous scans is greatly reduced. As the catalog provider is in control of the size of catalog form identifier and item numbers, it is possible for the catalog provider to ensure unambiguous designations.
It will be appreciated that, in alternate embodiments, specific catalog numbers and item numbers need not be employed, but are simply used for illustrative purposes. Any human-readable or machine-readable information may be used to disambiguate between forms and form fields and to correlate them with electronic instances of the same.
In addition, in a further exemplary embodiment, a dynamic display allows further functionality for dynamically displayed forms. In the dynamically displayed catalog example, actions associated with ordering items from a catalog form, such as form 1800, could be reflected in a dynamically updated portion of the dynamic display. In one such example, as a user selects items for purchase, a tally (not shown) is displayed listing the item, the quantity ordered, tax on the item, shipping costs and a total cost. Form field data, such as the user's address, tax-exempt status and the like are used to calculate shipping, tax rates and related information for the tally.
In one exemplary embodiment, a special symbol 1820 is presented to a user in a rendered document, representing that an order activity (generally a purchase) may be activated by scanning the symbol 1820. By scanning one or more items individually presented, the user can indicate their decision to make the purchase. Orders can be confirmed via any available display, via telephone, or by sending the user an email requiring further action.
In some embodiments, scanning an item multiple times (or scanning once and then indicating a quantity through another input method) may be used to indicate a purchase of multiple items. Additionally, scanning in an opposite direction (e.g., right to left) can undo or remove an ordered item or otherwise erase a form field. In general, such gestures (and others) with a scanning device 302, 500 may be used to enhance the interaction with a form, without requiring complex controls or user interfaces. The gestures may be detected using motion sensing components (not shown) of a scanning device 302, 500, such as accelerometers and the like.
To avoid additional actions the user may be able to complete the purchase in the moment. One relatively safe way to insure that the user actually intended to make the purchase is to have a separate action that the user is required to perform to complete the purchase. This action might be to push a special button on the scanning device 302, 500 or to scan a special object or phrase printed in the form 1800 (for example, a statement like “I agree to purchase”). The user may also identify themselves (possibly via a username and/or password) and/or confirm a purchase by scanning a special code or mark that can be printed on a card and carried by the user. If the coded information on the card is not easily copied, only a user in physical possession of the card could scan this data. Other forms of authentication and/or verification may be employed in various embodiments, including, but not limited to biometric authentication, PIN entry in a keypad, challenge/response, cryptographic tokens and the like.
In many cases, it may be helpful to know the location of the user. This would be useful, for example, when the user has access to a display device and wants their form displayed there. A label or other scanning-device-readable indicator (not shown) that identifies the specific display and or device may be available to the user. Scanning this label informs a document sources 234 (or account server) of the user's location. In some cases, the identifying label can be generated and displayed on a computer 212. Generally, only the user physically at the display device would then be able to scan this information, thereby providing an additional layer of security.
Form fields 1940 may be any type of predetermined symbol used to represent a form field. In exemplary form 1900, the symbols 1910A-H may correspond to mailing address, e-mail address, phone number, driver's license, name, work address, attorney bar number and annual income respectively. However, in alternate embodiments the symbols may have different meanings. Additionally, other symbols may also be used. For example, in various embodiments, payment method symbols may be used, such as a “bill me later” symbol or credit payment symbols, including recognizable symbols, such as the VISA®, American Express® and MasterCard® logos as symbolic representations of form fields requesting payment field data corresponding to a payment account associated with one or more of the payment method logos.
In addition to inclusive symbols, an iconic form may have exclusive symbols, such as symbols 1920A-B. Such symbols may indicate that no personal lodging information should be included when submitting the form, or that no personal financial information be included.
Form 1900 also includes form identifiers in 2D barcode 1930A, 1D barcode 1930B and numeric 1930C forms.
In a further alternate embodiment, the scanning device 302, 500 may be used in conjunction with an associated display, such as a display of a computer 212. Accordingly,
Likewise, in the electronic instance of a dynamically rendered form 2000, the form 2000 may have exclusive symbols, such as symbols 2020A-B. Such symbols may indicate that information should be included when submitting the form.
The symbolic form fields 2040 in dynamically rendered form 2000 may alter depending on a form fillers selection or de-selection of a particular form field.
Form 2000 also includes form identifiers in 2D barcode 1930A, 1D barcode 1930B and numeric 1930C forms. It will be appreciated that
Although specific embodiments have been illustrated and described herein, it will be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art and others, that a wide variety of alternate and/or equivalent implementations may be substituted for the specific embodiment shown and described without departing from the scope of the present invention. This application is intended to cover any adaptations or variations of the embodiment discussed herein. It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the above-described system may be straightforwardly adapted or extended in various ways. While the foregoing description makes reference to particular embodiments, the scope of the invention is defined solely by the claims that following and the elements recited therein.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US4052058||Apr 8, 1976||Oct 4, 1977||Hintz Ronald E||Pistol draw target|
|US4526078||Sep 23, 1982||Jul 2, 1985||Joel Chadabe||Interactive music composition and performance system|
|US4538072||Apr 19, 1983||Aug 27, 1985||Siemens Aktiengesellschaft||Optical wand for reading OCR characters and bar code marks|
|US4553261||May 31, 1983||Nov 12, 1985||Horst Froessl||Document and data handling and retrieval system|
|US4610025||Jun 22, 1984||Sep 2, 1986||Champollion Incorporated||Cryptographic analysis system|
|US4636848||Feb 23, 1984||Jan 13, 1987||Tokyo Shibaura Denki Kabushiki Kaisha||Document information filing system with a single display device|
|US4713008||Sep 9, 1986||Dec 15, 1987||Stocker Elizabeth M||Method and means for teaching a set of sound symbols through the unique device of phonetic phenomena|
|US4716804||Jul 1, 1985||Jan 5, 1988||Joel Chadabe||Interactive music performance system|
|US4748678||May 14, 1986||May 31, 1988||Hitachi, Ltd.||Method of storing and retrieving image data|
|US4776464||Jun 17, 1985||Oct 11, 1988||Bae Automated Systems, Inc.||Automated article handling system and process|
|US4804949||May 27, 1987||Feb 14, 1989||Everex Ti Corporation||Hand-held optical scanner and computer mouse|
|US4805099||Mar 21, 1988||Feb 14, 1989||Wang Laboratories, Inc.||Retrieval of related records from a relational database|
|US4829453||Mar 5, 1987||May 9, 1989||Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha||Apparatus for cataloging and retrieving image data|
|US4829872||May 10, 1988||May 16, 1989||Fairlight Instruments Pty. Limited||Detection of musical gestures|
|US4890230||Dec 17, 1987||Dec 26, 1989||Electric Industry Co., Ltd.||Electronic dictionary|
|US4901364||Sep 26, 1986||Feb 13, 1990||Everex Ti Corporation||Interactive optical scanner system|
|US4903229 *||Mar 13, 1987||Feb 20, 1990||Pitney Bowes Inc.||Forms generating and information retrieval system|
|US4941125||Aug 1, 1984||Jul 10, 1990||Smithsonian Institution||Information storage and retrieval system|
|US4947261||Jul 7, 1988||Aug 7, 1990||Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha||Portable image input device|
|US4949391||May 8, 1987||Aug 14, 1990||Everex Ti Corporation||Adaptive image acquisition system|
|US4968877||Sep 14, 1988||Nov 6, 1990||Sensor Frame Corporation||VideoHarp|
|US4985863||Jul 30, 1990||Jan 15, 1991||Hitachi, Ltd.||Document storage and retrieval system|
|US4988981||Feb 28, 1989||Jan 29, 1991||Vpl Research, Inc.||Computer data entry and manipulation apparatus and method|
|US5010500||Jan 26, 1989||Apr 23, 1991||Xerox Corporation||Gesture-modified diagram for retrieval of image resembling diagram, with parts selectable for further interactive retrieval|
|US5012349||Jun 26, 1987||Apr 30, 1991||Fay Stefan G De||Method and portable device for detection, storage and for eventual processing and reproduction of graphic symbols appearing on any type of carrier|
|US5062143||Feb 23, 1990||Oct 29, 1991||Harris Corporation||Trigram-based method of language identification|
|US5083218||Feb 8, 1990||Jan 21, 1992||Casio Computer Co., Ltd.||Hand-held image reading apparatus|
|US5093873||Dec 27, 1990||Mar 3, 1992||Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba||Electronic filing apparatus using part of read image information as retrieval information|
|US5109439||Jun 12, 1990||Apr 28, 1992||Horst Froessl||Mass document storage and retrieval system|
|US5119081||Feb 28, 1989||Jun 2, 1992||Ricoh Company, Ltd.||Control apparatus of image filing system|
|US5133024||Aug 13, 1990||Jul 21, 1992||Horst Froessl||Image data bank system with selective conversion|
|US5133052||Aug 4, 1988||Jul 21, 1992||Xerox Corporation||Interactive graphical search and replace utility for computer-resident synthetic graphic image editors|
|US5136687||Oct 10, 1989||Aug 4, 1992||Edelman Gerald M||Categorization automata employing neuronal group selection with reentry|
|US5146404||Sep 19, 1986||Sep 8, 1992||Westinghouse Electric Corporation||Electronic maintenance support work station|
|US5146552||Feb 28, 1990||Sep 8, 1992||International Business Machines Corporation||Method for associating annotation with electronically published material|
|US5157384||Apr 28, 1989||Oct 20, 1992||International Business Machines Corporation||Advanced user interface|
|US5168565||Jan 13, 1989||Dec 1, 1992||Ricoh Company, Ltd.||Document retrieval system|
|US5179652||Dec 13, 1989||Jan 12, 1993||Anthony I. Rozmanith||Method and apparatus for storing, transmitting and retrieving graphical and tabular data|
|US5185857||Jun 27, 1990||Feb 9, 1993||Rozmanith A Martin||Method and apparatus for multi-optional processing, storing, transmitting and retrieving graphical and tabular data in a mobile transportation distributable and/or networkable communications and/or data processing system|
|US5201010||May 19, 1992||Apr 6, 1993||Credit Verification Corporation||Method and system for building a database and performing marketing based upon prior shopping history|
|US5202985||Dec 2, 1991||Apr 13, 1993||Racal-Datacom, Inc.||Apparatus and method for displaying data communication network configuration after searching the network|
|US5203704||Dec 21, 1990||Apr 20, 1993||Mccloud Seth R||Method of communication using pointing vector gestures and mnemonic devices to assist in learning point vector gestures|
|US5229590||Jun 10, 1991||Jul 20, 1993||Spectra-Physics Scanning Systems, Inc.||Dome-shaped handheld laser scanner|
|US5231698||Mar 20, 1991||Jul 27, 1993||Forcier Mitchell D||Script/binary-encoded-character processing method and system|
|US5243149||Apr 10, 1992||Sep 7, 1993||International Business Machines Corp.||Method and apparatus for improving the paper interface to computing systems|
|US5247285||Mar 6, 1992||Sep 21, 1993||Everex Systems, Inc.||Standup portable personal computer with detachable wireless keyboard and adjustable display|
|US5251106||Mar 6, 1992||Oct 5, 1993||Everex Systems, Inc.||Stackable enclosure for electronic devices|
|US5251316||Jun 28, 1991||Oct 5, 1993||Digital Equipment Corporation||Method and apparatus for integrating a dynamic lexicon into a full-text information retrieval system|
|US5252951||Oct 21, 1991||Oct 12, 1993||International Business Machines Corporation||Graphical user interface with gesture recognition in a multiapplication environment|
|US5288938||Dec 5, 1990||Feb 22, 1994||Yamaha Corporation||Method and apparatus for controlling electronic tone generation in accordance with a detected type of performance gesture|
|US5301243||Jun 19, 1992||Apr 5, 1994||Francis Olschafskie||Hand-held character-oriented scanner with external view area|
|US5347295||Oct 31, 1990||Sep 13, 1994||Go Corporation||Control of a computer through a position-sensed stylus|
|US5347306||Dec 17, 1993||Sep 13, 1994||Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories, Inc.||Animated electronic meeting place|
|US5347477||Mar 2, 1993||Sep 13, 1994||Jack Lee||Pen-based form computer|
|US5355146||Jan 30, 1991||Oct 11, 1994||Bmc Micro-Industries Ltd.||Multi-directional hand scanner and mouse|
|US5360971||Jan 19, 1993||Nov 1, 1994||The Research Foundation State University Of New York||Apparatus and method for eye tracking interface|
|US5367453||Aug 2, 1993||Nov 22, 1994||Apple Computer, Inc.||Method and apparatus for correcting words|
|US5377706||May 21, 1993||Jan 3, 1995||Huang; Jih-Tung||Garbage collecting device|
|US5398310||Apr 13, 1992||Mar 14, 1995||Apple Computer, Incorporated||Pointing gesture based computer note pad paging and scrolling interface|
|US5404442||Nov 30, 1992||Apr 4, 1995||Apple Computer, Inc.||Visible clipboard for graphical computer environments|
|US5404458||Feb 24, 1994||Apr 4, 1995||International Business Machines Corporation||Recognizing the cessation of motion of a pointing device on a display by comparing a group of signals to an anchor point|
|US5418684||Feb 4, 1994||May 23, 1995||Norand Corporation||Hand-held data capture system with interchangeable modules|
|US5418717||Dec 12, 1991||May 23, 1995||Su; Keh-Yih||Multiple score language processing system|
|US5418951||Sep 30, 1994||May 23, 1995||The United States Of America As Represented By The Director Of National Security Agency||Method of retrieving documents that concern the same topic|
|US5423554||Sep 24, 1993||Jun 13, 1995||Metamedia Ventures, Inc.||Virtual reality game method and apparatus|
|US5430558||Sep 29, 1992||Jul 4, 1995||Sohaei; Frank||Portable optical scanner with integral audio recorder|
|US5438630||Dec 17, 1992||Aug 1, 1995||Xerox Corporation||Word spotting in bitmap images using word bounding boxes and hidden Markov models|
|US5452442||Apr 14, 1995||Sep 19, 1995||International Business Machines Corporation||Methods and apparatus for evaluating and extracting signatures of computer viruses and other undesirable software entities|
|US5454043||Jul 30, 1993||Sep 26, 1995||Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories, Inc.||Dynamic and static hand gesture recognition through low-level image analysis|
|US5462473||Jul 1, 1994||Oct 31, 1995||Sheller; Ken||Toy with slow movement recovery|
|US5465325||May 27, 1993||Nov 7, 1995||Apple Computer, Inc.||Method and apparatus for manipulating inked objects|
|US5467425||Feb 26, 1993||Nov 14, 1995||International Business Machines Corporation||Building scalable N-gram language models using maximum likelihood maximum entropy N-gram models|
|US5481278||Oct 15, 1993||Jan 2, 1996||Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha||Information processing apparatus|
|US5485565||Aug 4, 1993||Jan 16, 1996||Xerox Corporation||Gestural indicators for selecting graphic objects|
|US5488196||Jan 19, 1994||Jan 30, 1996||Zimmerman; Thomas G.||Electronic musical re-performance and editing system|
|US5499108||Dec 9, 1992||Mar 12, 1996||Visioneer Communications, Inc.||Document-driven scanning input device communicating with a computer|
|US5500937||Sep 8, 1993||Mar 19, 1996||Apple Computer, Inc.||Method and apparatus for editing an inked object while simultaneously displaying its recognized object|
|US5502803||Jan 13, 1994||Mar 26, 1996||Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha||Information processing apparatus having a gesture editing function|
|US5512707||Jan 4, 1994||Apr 30, 1996||Yamaha Corporation||Control panel having a graphical user interface for setting control panel data with stylus|
|US5517578||May 20, 1993||May 14, 1996||Aha! Software Corporation||Method and apparatus for grouping and manipulating electronic representations of handwriting, printing and drawings|
|US5522798||Oct 17, 1994||Jun 4, 1996||Abbott Laboratories||Control of a multi-channel drug infusion pump using a pharmacokinetic model|
|US5533141||Dec 23, 1992||Jul 2, 1996||Hitachi, Ltd.||Portable pen pointing device and a processing system with pen pointing device|
|US5539427||Jan 27, 1994||Jul 23, 1996||Compaq Computer Corporation||Graphic indexing system|
|US5543591||Oct 7, 1994||Aug 6, 1996||Synaptics, Incorporated||Object position detector with edge motion feature and gesture recognition|
|US5550930||Apr 5, 1993||Aug 27, 1996||Microsoft Corporation||Method and system for training a handwriting recognizer at the time of misrecognition|
|US5555363||Sep 30, 1993||Sep 10, 1996||Apple Computer, Inc.||Resetting the case of text on a computer display|
|US5563996||Sep 24, 1993||Oct 8, 1996||Apple Computer, Inc.||Computer note pad including gesture based note division tools and method|
|US5568452||Nov 1, 1991||Oct 22, 1996||Kronenberg; Harry||Alarm clock|
|US5570113||Jun 29, 1994||Oct 29, 1996||International Business Machines Corporation||Computer based pen system and method for automatically cancelling unwanted gestures and preventing anomalous signals as inputs to such system|
|US5574804||Dec 2, 1993||Nov 12, 1996||Olschafskie; Francis||Hand-held scanner|
|US5581276||Sep 8, 1993||Dec 3, 1996||Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba||3D human interface apparatus using motion recognition based on dynamic image processing|
|US5581670||Jul 21, 1993||Dec 3, 1996||Xerox Corporation||User interface having movable sheet with click-through tools|
|US5581681||Jun 7, 1995||Dec 3, 1996||Apple Computer, Inc.||Pointing gesture based computer note pad paging and scrolling interface|
|US5583542||May 27, 1993||Dec 10, 1996||Apple Computer, Incorporated||Method for deleting objects on a computer display|
|US5583543||Nov 1, 1993||Dec 10, 1996||Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha||Pen input processing apparatus|
|US5583980||Dec 22, 1993||Dec 10, 1996||Knowledge Media Inc.||Time-synchronized annotation method|
|US5590219||Mar 16, 1995||Dec 31, 1996||Apple Computer, Inc.||Method and apparatus for recognizing gestures on a computer system|
|US5590256||Dec 14, 1994||Dec 31, 1996||Apple Computer, Inc.||Method for manipulating notes on a computer display|
|US6641037 *||Dec 13, 2001||Nov 4, 2003||Peter Williams||Method and system for interactively providing product related information on demand and providing personalized transactional benefits at a point of purchase|
|US6671684 *||Sep 1, 2000||Dec 30, 2003||Ricoh Co., Ltd.||Method and apparatus for simultaneous highlighting of a physical version of a document and an electronic version of a document|
|US6801658 *||Dec 9, 2002||Oct 5, 2004||Hitachi, Ltd.||Business form handling method and system for carrying out the same|
|US20010003177 *||Jan 24, 2001||Jun 7, 2001||Silicon Stemcell, Llc||Printed medium activated interactive communication|
|US20010053252 *||Jun 13, 2001||Dec 20, 2001||Stuart Creque||Method of knowledge management and information retrieval utilizing natural characteristics of published documents as an index method to a digital content store|
|US20020032698 *||Sep 13, 2001||Mar 14, 2002||Cox Ingemar J.||Identifying works for initiating a work-based action, such as an action on the internet|
|US20030195851 *||Apr 11, 2003||Oct 16, 2003||Ong Lance D.||System for managing distribution of digital audio content|
|US20040015437 *||Jun 9, 2001||Jan 22, 2004||Je-Hyung Choi||System for providing information using medium indicative of effective term and authorization of charged internet site and settling accounts for use of provided information|
|US20040064783 *||Sep 30, 2002||Apr 1, 2004||Braun John F.||Method and system for remote form completion|
|US20040205534 *||May 9, 2002||Oct 14, 2004||Koelle Steven K.||System and method for providing access to forms and maintaining the data used to complete the forms|
|US20050010750 *||May 2, 2002||Jan 13, 2005||Ward Andrew Martin Robert||User interface systems|
|US20050289054 *||Aug 15, 2005||Dec 29, 2005||Silverbrook Research Pty Ltd||System for associating printer account data|
|USD306162||Oct 20, 1987||Feb 20, 1990||Everex Ti Corporation||Hand-held OCR scanner|
|USRE34476||May 28, 1992||Dec 14, 1993||Norwood Donald D||Hybrid information management system for handwriting and text|
|1||Airclic. "Products." http://www.airclic.com/products.asp, accessed Oct. 3, 2005, 3pp.|
|2||Arai, Toshifumi , Dietmar Aust, Scott E. Hudson. "Paperlink: A Technique for Hyperlinking From Real Paper to Electronic Content." Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 97), Addison-Wesley, Apr. 1997, pp. 327-334.|
|3||Aust, Dietmar. "Augmenting Paper Documents with Digital Information in a Mobile Environment" MS Thesis, University of Dortmund, Department of Computer Graphics, 1996. 47pp.|
|4||Bai, Zhen-Long, and Qiang Huo "An Approach to Extracting the Target Text Line from a Document Image Captured by a Pen Scanner." Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR 2003) 2003, 5 pp.|
|5||Bell, Timothy, Ian H. Witten, John G. Cleary. "Modeling for Text Compression." ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 21, No. 4, Dec. 1989, pp. 557-591.|
|6||Bentley, Jon L. and Robert Sedgewick. "Fast Algorithms for Sorting and Searching Strings." Proceedings of the 10th ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms. New York, NY: ACM Press, 1997, pp. 360-369.|
|7||C Technologies AB. "CPEN User's Guide." Jan. 2001, 130pp.|
|8||C Technologies AB. "User's Guide for C-Pen 10." Aug. 2001, 128pp.|
|9||Capobianco, Robert A. "Design Considerations for: Optical Coupling of Flashlamps and Fiber Optics." PerkinElmer, 1998-2003. http://optoelectronics.perkinelmer.com/content/whitepapers/OpticalCoupling.pdf, 12 pp.|
|10||Casio Computer Co. Ltd, ALPS Electric Co., Ltd. "Alliance Agreement on Development and Mass Production of Fingerprint Scanner for Mobile Devices." Press Release, Feb. 25, 2003. http://world.casio.com/pacific/news/2003/fingerprint.html, 2pp.|
|11||Cenker, Christian. "Wavelet Packets and Optimization in Pattern Recognition." Proceedings of the 21st International Workshop of the AAPR, Hallstatt, Austria, May 1997, 11pp.|
|12||Clancy, Heather. "Cell Phones Get New Job: Portable Scanning." C/Net News.com, http://news.com.com/2102-1039-5572897.html?tag=st.util.print, Accessed Feb. 13, 2005, 3pp.|
|13||Cybertracker. Homepage. http://www.cybertracker.co.za/, accessed Oct. 3, 2005, 2pp.|
|14||Digital Convergence. "CueCat." www.cuecat.com, accessed Oct. 3, 2005, 2 pp.|
|15||Doermann, David, Huiping Li, Omid Kia, Kemal Kilic. "The Detection of Duplicates in Document Image Databases." Technical Report. LAMP-TR-005/CAR-TR-850/CS-TR-3739, University of Maryland College Park, Feb. 1997, 39pp.|
|16||Duong, Jean, Myriam Côté, Hubert Emptoz, Ching Y. Suen. "Extraction of Text Areas in Printed Document Images." Proceedings of the 2001 ACM Symposium on Document Engineering. New York, NY: ACM Press, 2001, pp. 157-164.|
|17||Erol, Berna, Jonathan J. Hull, and Dar-Shyang Lee. "Linking Multimedia Presentations with their Symbolic Source Documents: Algorithm and Applications." ACM Multimedia. New York, NY: ACM Press, 2003, 10pp.|
|18||Fall, C.J., A Törcsvári, K. Benzineb, G. Karetka. "Automated Categorization in the International Patent Classification." ACM SIGIR Forum. vol. 37, Issue 1, Spring 2003: 10-25.|
|19||Ficstar. Homepage. www.ficstar.com, accessed Oct. 4, 2005, 1p.|
|20||Fitzgibbon, Andrew, and Ehud Reiter. "Memories for Life: Managing Information Over a Human Lifetime." UK Computing Research Committee's Grand Challenges in Computing Workshop, May 22, 2003. 8pp.|
|21||Ghani, Rayid, Rosie Jones, and Dunja Mladenic. "Mining the Web to Create Minority Language Corpora." Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM). Atlanta, Georgia, Nov. 5-10, 2001, pp. 279-286.|
|22||Google. "Simplicity and Enterprise Search.". 2003 http://www.google.com/enterprise/pdf/google-simplicity-enterprise-wp.pdf, 7pp.|
|23||Graham, Jamey, Berna Erol, Jonathan J. Hull, and Dar-Shyang Lee. "The Video Paper Multimedia Playback System." Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM International Conference on Multimedia. New York, NY: ACM Press, 2003, pp. 94-95.|
|24||Grossman, David A, Ophir Frieder, Nazli Goharian "Token Identification" Slideshow. 2002, 15 pp.|
|25||Hansen, Jesse. "A Matlab Project in Optical Character Recognition (OCR)." DSP Lab, University of Rhode Island. May 15, 2002, 6pp.|
|26||Heiner,Jeremy M. , Scott E. Hudson, Kenichiro Tanaka. "Linking and Messaging from Real Paper in the Paper PDA." ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. New York, NY: ACM Press, 1999, pp. 179-186.|
|27||Hewlett-Packard Company. "HP Capshare 920 Portable E-Copier and Information Appliance User Guide, First Edition," 1999, 42 pp.|
|28||Hjaltason, Gisli R. and Hanan Samet. "Distance Browsing in Spatial Databases." ACM Transactions on Database Systems. vol. 24, No. 2, Jun. 1999: 265-318.|
|29||Hong, Tao and Jonathan H. Hull. "Degraded Text Recognition Using Word Collocation and Visual Inter-Word Constraints." Fourth ACL Conference on Applied Natural Language Processing, Stuttgart, Germany, 1994, 2pp.|
|30||Hopkins, George W., and Tad D. Simons. "A Semi-Imaging Light Pipe for Collecting Weakly Scattered Light." Hewlett Packard Company, Jun. 1998, 6 pp.|
|31||Hull, Jonathan J, and Dar-Shyang Lee. "Simultaneous Highlighting of Paper and Electronic Documents." Proceedings of the International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR '00), vol. 4, Barcelona, 2000, 4401-4404.|
|32||Hull, Jonathan J, Dar-Shyang Lee, John Cullen, Peter E. Hart. "Document Analysis Techniques for the Infinite Memory Multifunction Machine." DEXA Workshop, 1999. http://www.informatik.uni-trier.de/~ley/db/conf/dexaw/dexaw99.html, 5pp.|
|33||Inglis, Stuart and Ian H. Witten. "Compression-Based Template Matching." University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand, 1994, 10 pp.|
|34||IPValue Management, Xerox Research Centre Europe. "Technology Licensing Opportunity: Xerox Mobile Camera Document Imaging." Slideshow, Mar. 1, 2004, 11pp.|
|35||IRIS. "IRIS Pen Executive." Brochure, 2 pp.|
|36||ISRI Staff. "OCR Accuracy Produced By the Current DOE Document Conversion System." Technical Report Jun. 2006, Information Science Research Institute at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas. May 2002, 9pp.|
|37||Jainschigg, John and Richard "Zippy" Grigonis, "M-Commerce Alternatives," Communications Convergence.com, http://www.cconvergence.com/shared/article/showArticle.jhtml?articleId=8701069, May 7, 2001, 14pp.|
|38||Janesick, James. "Dueling Detectors." Spie's OE Magazine. Feb. 2002: 30-33.|
|39||Jenny, Reinhard. "Fundamentals of Fiber Optics: An Introduction for Beginners." Technical Report for Volpi AG, Apr. 26, 2000. http://www.volpiusa.com/whitepapers/FundamentalsofFiberOptics.pdf, 23pp.|
|40||Kahan, José and Marja-Riitta Koivunen. "Annotea: An Open RDF Infrastructure for Shared Web Annotations." Proceedings of the 10th International World Wide Web Conference, Hong Kong, 2001. http://www10.org/cdrom/papers/frame.html, pp. 623-632.|
|41||Kasabach, Chris, Chris Pacione, John Stivoric, Francine Gemperle, Dan Siewiorek. "Digital Ink: A Familiar Idea with Technological Might!" CHI 1998 Conference. New York, NY: ACM Press, 1998, pp. 175-176.|
|42||Keytronic. "F-SCAN-S001US Stand Alone Fingerprint Scanner." http://www.keytronic.com/home/shop/Productlist.asp?CATID=62&SubCATID=1, accessed Oct. 4, 2005, 2pp.|
|43||Khoubyari, Siamak. "The Application of Word Image Matching in Text Recognition." MS Thesis, State University of New York at Buffalo, Jun. 1992, 107pp.|
|44||Kia, Omid and David Doerman. "Integrated Segmentation and Clustering for Enhanced Compression of Document Images." International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition, Ulm Germany Aug. 18-20, 1997 vol. 1. 6 pp.|
|45||Kia, Omid E. "Document Image Compression and Analysis." PhD Thesis, University of Maryland at College Park, 1997, 141pp.|
|46||Kia, Omid, David Doerman, Azriel Rosenfeld, Rama Chellappa. "Symbolic Compression and Processing of Document Images." Technical Report: LAMP-TR-004/CFAR-TR-849/CS-TR-3734, University of Maryland, College Park, Jan. 1997, 36pp.|
|47||Kia, Omid. "Integrated Segmentation and Clustering for Enhanced Compression of Document Images." International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition, Ulm, Germany, Aug. 18-20, 1997, 7pp.|
|48||Kopec, Gary E. "Multilevel Character Templates for Document Image Decoding." IS&T/SPIE 1997 International Symposium on Electronic Imaging: Science & Technology, San Jose, CA, Feb. 8-14, 1997, 10pp.|
|49||Kopec, Gary E., Maya R. Said, Kris Popat. "N-Gram Language Models for Document Image Decoding." Proceedings of IS&T/SPIE Electronics Imaging 2002: Document Recognition and Retrieval IX, vol. 4670-20, Jan. 2002. 12 pp.|
|50||Kukich, Karen. "Techniques for Automatically Correcting Words in Text." ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 24, No. 4, Dec. 1992: pp. 377-439.|
|51||Lee, Bongsoo, Won Y. Choi, James K. Walker. "Ultrahigh-Resolution Plastic Graded-index fused Image Plates." Optics Letters, vol. 24, No. 10, May 15, 2000: 719-721.|
|52||Lee, D.L, and F.H. Lochovsky. "Voice Response Systems." ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 15, Issue 4, Dec. 1983: pp. 351-374.|
|53||Lee, Dar-Shyang and Jonathan J. Hull. "Detecting Duplicates Among Symbolically Compressed Images in a Large Document Database." Pattern Recognition Letters, No. 22, 2001: 545-550.|
|54||Lee, Dar-Shyang and Jonathan J. Hull. "Duplicate Detection for Symbolically Compressed Documents." Fifth International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR), 1999, 4pp.|
|55||Lee, Dar-Shyang. "Substitution Deciphering Based on HMMs with Applications to Compressed Document Processing." IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 24, No. 12.. Washington DC: IEEE Computer Society, Dec. 2002, pp. 1661-1666.|
|56||Lesher, G.W., Moulton, B.J. & Higginbotham, D.J. (1999) "Effects of Ngram Order and Training Text Size on Word Prediction." Proceedings of the RESNA '99 Annual Conference, 1999, 3pp.|
|57||Lieberman, Henry. "Out of Many, One: Reliable Results from Unreliable Recognition." ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2002); Apr. 20-25, 2000; Minneapolis; MN; 2 pp.|
|59||Liu, Lon-Mu, Yair M. Babad, Wei Sun, and Ki-Kan Chan. "Adaptive Post-Processing of OCR Text Via Knowledge Acquisition." Proceedings of the ACM 1991 Computer Science Conference. New York, NY: ACM Press, 1991, pp. 558-569.|
|60||Ljungstrand, Peter, Johan Redström, and Lars Erik Holmquist. "Webstickers: Using Physical Tokens to Access, Manage, and Share Bookmarks to the Web." Proceedings of Designing Augmented Reality Environments 2000, Elsinore, Denmark, Apr. 12-14, 2000, pp. 23-31.|
|61||LTI Computer Vision Library "LTI Image Processing Library Developer's Guide. Version 29.10.2003." Aachen, Germany, 2002, 45 pp.|
|62||Manolescu, Dragos-Anton. "Feature Extraction-A Pattern for Information Retrieval" Proceedings of the 5th Pattern Languages of Programming, Monticello, Illinois, Aug. 1998, 18pp.|
|63||McNamee, Paul, James Mayfield, Christine Piatko. "Haircut: A System for Multilingual Text Retrieval in Java." Journal of Computing Sciences in Small Colleges. vol. 17, Issue 2, Feb. 2002: 8-22.|
|64||Mind Like Water. "Collection Creator." www.collectioncreator.com, accessed Oct. 2, 2005, 3pp.|
|65||Muddu, Prashant. "A Study of Image Transmission Through a Fiber-Optic Conduit and its Enhancement Using Digital Image Processing Techniques." Thesis, Florida State College of Engineering, Nov. 18, 2003, 93 pp.|
|66||Munich, Mario E, and Pietro Perona. "Visual Input for Pen-Based Computers." Proceedings of the International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR '96) vol. III. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE CS Press. Jun. 1996, 5pp.|
|67||Murdoch, Gregary and Nicholas Kushmerick. "Mapping Physical Artifacts to their Web Counterparts: A Case Study with Products Catalogs." MHCI-2004 Workshop on Mobile and Ubiquitous Information Access (Strathclyde, UK). 2004, 7pp.|
|68||Nabeshima, Shinji, Shinichirou Yamamoto, Kiyoshi Agusa, Toshio Taguchi. "Memo-Pen: A New Input Device." CHI '95 Proceedings Short Papers. New York, NY: ACM Press, 1995, pp. 256-257.|
|69||Nautilus Hyosung. "New Software for Automated Teller Machines." http://www.nautilus.hyosung.com/product-service/software-software05.html, accessed Oct. 4, 2005, 3pp.|
|70||NEOMEDIA Technologies "Paperclick for Cellphones." 2004. brochure 2pp.|
|71||NEOMEDIA Technologies "Paperclick Linking Services." Brochure. 2004, 1 page.|
|72||NEOMEDIA Technologies. "For Wireless Communication Providers." Brochure. 2004, 1 page.|
|73||Neville, Sean. "Project Atom, Amazon, Mobile Web Services, and Fireflies at REST" Artima Weblogs, http://www.artima.com/weblogs/viewpost.jsp?thread=18731, Oct. 24, 2003, 4pp.|
|74||Newman, William and Pierre Wellner. "A Desk Supporting Computer-based Interaction with Paper Documents." Proceedings of ACM CHI'92 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York, NY: ACM Press, 1992, pp. 587-592.|
|75||ONClick Corporation. "VIA Mouse VIA-251." Brochure, 2pp.|
|76||Pal, U. S. Sinha, and B.B. Chaudhuri. "Multi-Oriented Text Lines Detection and Their Skew Estimation." Indian Conference on Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing, Ahmedabad, India, Dec. 16-18, 2002, 6pp.|
|77||Peacocks MD&B. "Peacocks MD&B, Releases Latest hands and Eyes Free Voice Recognition Barcode Scanner." http://www.peacocks.com.au/store/page.pl?id=457, Dec. 5, 2004, 2pp.|
|78||Peterson, James L. "Detecting and Correcting Spelling Errors." Communications of the ACM, vol. 23 No. 12, Dec. 1980, pp. 676-687.|
|79||Planon Systems Solutions. "Docupen 700." www.docupen.com, accesssed Oct. 3, 2005.|
|80||Podio, Fernando L "Biometrics-Technologies For Highly Secure Personal Authentication," National Institute of Standards and Technology, http://whitepapers.zdnet.com/search.aspx?compid=3968, May 2001, 8pp.|
|81||Precise Biometrics. "Precise 200 MC." http://www.precisebiometrics.com/data/content/DOCUMENTS/200592691619553200%20MC.pdf. accessed Oct. 4, 2005, 2pp.|
|82||Price, Morgan N, Gene Golovchinsky, Bill N. Schilit. "Linking by Inking: Trailblazing in a Paper-like Hypertext." Proceedings of Hypertext '98. Pittsburgh, PA: ACM Press, 1998, 10 pp.|
|83||Psion Teklogix. "Workabout Pro." http://www.psionteklogix.com/public.aspx?s=uk&p=Products&pCat=128&pID=1058, accessed Oct. 3, 2005, 2pp.|
|84||Rao, Ramana, Stuart K. Card, Walter Johnson, Leigh Klotz, and Randall H. Trigg. "Protofoil: Storing and Finding the Information Worker's Paper Documents in an Electronic File Cabinet." Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York, NY: ACM Press, 1994, pp. 180-185, 477.|
|85||Roberts, David A. and Richard R.A. Syms. "1D and 2D Laser Line Scan Generation Using a Fibre Optic Resonant Scanner." Department of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, Imperial College of Science Technology and Medicine, 2003, 11pp.|
|86||Rus, Daniela, and Devika Subramanian. "Multi-media RISSC Informatics: Retrieving Information with Simple Structural Components." Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. New York, NY: 1993, pp. 283-294.|
|87||Samet, Hanan. "Data Structures for Quadtree Approximation and Compression." Communications of the ACM, vol. 28, No. 9, Sep. 1985: pp. 973-993.|
|88||Schilit, Bill N. Gene Golovchinsky, Morgan N. Price. "Beyond Paper: Supporting Active Reading with Free Form Digital Ink Annotations." Proceedings of CHI 98. new York, NY: ACM Press, 1998, 8pp.|
|89||Schott North America, "Clad Rod/ Image Conduit" Nov. 2004, 1 page.|
|90||Selberg, Erik, and Oren Etzioni. "On the Instability of Web Search Engines." In the Proceedings of RIAO, Paris, Apr. 2000, 14pp.|
|91||Smithwick, Quinn Y. J., Juris Vagners, Per G. Reinhall, Eric J. Seibel. "54.3: Modeling and Control of the Resonant Fiber Scanner for Laser Scanning Display or Acquisition." SID Symposium Digest of Technical Papers, vol. 34, Issue 1, May 2003: 1455-1457.|
|92||Sonka, Milan , Vaclav Hlavac, and Roger Boyle, Image Processing, Analysis, and Machine Vision: (Second Edition). International Thomson Publishing, 1998. Contents, Index, Preface, 37pp.|
|93||Sony. "Sony Puppy Fingerprint Identity Products." http://bssc.sel.sony.com/Professional/puppy/, 2002, 1 p.|
|94||Spitz, A. Lawrence. "Progress in Document Reconstruction." Document Recognition Technologies, Inc. 16th Internaional Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR '02), 2002, 4pp.|
|95||Spitz, A. Lawrence. "Shape-based Word Recognition." International Journal on Document Analysis and Recognition, Oct. 20, 1998, 13 pp.|
|96||Srihari, Sargur N., Jonathan J. Hull, and Ramesh Choudhari. "Integrating Diverse Knowledge Sources in Text Recognition." ACM Transactions in Office Information Systems. vol. 1, No. 1, Jan. 1983, pp. 68-87.|
|97||Stevens, Jacob, Andrew Gee, and Chris Dance. "Automatic Processing of Document Annotations." Xerox Research Centre Europe. http://www.bmva.ac.uk/bmvc/1998/pdf/p062.pdf, 1998, 11 pp.|
|98||U.S. Appl. No. 10/676,881, Lee et al.|
|99||U.S. Appl. No. 60/201,570, Bengston.|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US7756869 *||Apr 30, 2004||Jul 13, 2010||The Boeing Company||Methods and apparatus for extracting referential keys from a document|
|US7778457 *||Aug 17, 2010||Mitek Systems, Inc.||Systems for mobile image capture and processing of checks|
|US7783018 *||Aug 24, 2010||Goldberg Mark S||Directory display and configurable entry system|
|US7873433 *||Jan 18, 2011||Voith Patent Gmbh||Production optimization using data received from a removable component|
|US7929766 *||Jun 8, 2007||Apr 19, 2011||Apple Inc.||Identifiers for digital media|
|US7941744 *||May 10, 2011||Adp, Inc.||System and method for electronic document generation and delivery|
|US7949176 *||May 24, 2011||Mitek Systems, Inc.||Systems for mobile image capture and processing of documents|
|US7949208 *||May 24, 2011||Sony Corporation||Monitor system, monitor device, search method, and search program|
|US7949560||Jun 13, 2007||May 24, 2011||Palo Alto Research Center Incorporated||System and method for providing print advertisements|
|US7953268 *||May 31, 2011||Mitek Systems, Inc.||Methods for mobile image capture and processing of documents|
|US7958081||Sep 28, 2007||Jun 7, 2011||Jagtag, Inc.||Apparatuses, methods and systems for information querying and serving on mobile devices based on ambient conditions|
|US7978900 *||Jul 12, 2011||Mitek Systems, Inc.||Systems for mobile image capture and processing of checks|
|US7990556||Feb 28, 2006||Aug 2, 2011||Google Inc.||Association of a portable scanner with input/output and storage devices|
|US8000514 *||Aug 16, 2011||Mitek Systems, Inc.||Methods for mobile image capture and processing of checks|
|US8005720||Aug 23, 2011||Google Inc.||Applying scanned information to identify content|
|US8019648||Sep 13, 2011||Google Inc.||Search engines and systems with handheld document data capture devices|
|US8060511||Nov 15, 2011||The Boeing Company||Method for extracting referential keys from a document|
|US8064700||Mar 10, 2010||Nov 22, 2011||Google Inc.||Method and system for character recognition|
|US8069168||Sep 28, 2007||Nov 29, 2011||Augme Technologies, Inc.||Apparatuses, methods and systems for information querying and serving in a virtual world based on profiles|
|US8069169 *||Nov 29, 2011||Augme Technologies, Inc.||Apparatuses, methods and systems for information querying and serving on the internet based on profiles|
|US8081849||Feb 6, 2007||Dec 20, 2011||Google Inc.||Portable scanning and memory device|
|US8146156||Mar 27, 2012||Google Inc.||Archive of text captures from rendered documents|
|US8179563||Sep 29, 2010||May 15, 2012||Google Inc.||Portable scanning device|
|US8214387||Jul 3, 2012||Google Inc.||Document enhancement system and method|
|US8233714 *||Jul 31, 2012||Abbyy Software Ltd.||Method and system for creating flexible structure descriptions|
|US8261094||Aug 19, 2010||Sep 4, 2012||Google Inc.||Secure data gathering from rendered documents|
|US8300261 *||Oct 30, 2012||Avery Dennison Corporation||Systems and methods for retrieving printable media templates|
|US8326015 *||Apr 20, 2011||Dec 4, 2012||Mitek Systems, Inc.||Methods for mobile image capture and processing of documents|
|US8345835||Jan 1, 2013||Zvi Or-Bach||Systems and methods for visual presentation and selection of IVR menu|
|US8346620||Jan 1, 2013||Google Inc.||Automatic modification of web pages|
|US8370143 *||Feb 5, 2013||Google Inc.||Selectively processing user input|
|US8370323||Dec 21, 2010||Feb 5, 2013||Intel Corporation||Providing information services related to multimodal inputs|
|US8385964||Feb 26, 2013||Xone, Inc.||Methods and apparatuses for geospatial-based sharing of information by multiple devices|
|US8406388||Mar 26, 2013||Zvi Or-Bach||Systems and methods for visual presentation and selection of IVR menu|
|US8407220||Mar 26, 2013||Augme Technologies, Inc.||Apparatuses, methods and systems for ambiguous code-triggered information querying and serving on mobile devices|
|US8418055||Apr 9, 2013||Google Inc.||Identifying a document by performing spectral analysis on the contents of the document|
|US8438489 *||Jan 26, 2009||May 7, 2013||Paulo Barthelmess||System and method for document markup|
|US8442331||Aug 18, 2009||May 14, 2013||Google Inc.||Capturing text from rendered documents using supplemental information|
|US8447066||Mar 12, 2010||May 21, 2013||Google Inc.||Performing actions based on capturing information from rendered documents, such as documents under copyright|
|US8447111||Feb 21, 2011||May 21, 2013||Google Inc.||Triggering actions in response to optically or acoustically capturing keywords from a rendered document|
|US8447144||May 21, 2013||Google Inc.||Data capture from rendered documents using handheld device|
|US8447510 *||Jun 16, 2011||May 21, 2013||Augme Technologies, Inc.||Apparatuses, methods and systems for determining and announcing proximity between trajectories|
|US8489624||Jan 29, 2010||Jul 16, 2013||Google, Inc.||Processing techniques for text capture from a rendered document|
|US8505090||Feb 20, 2012||Aug 6, 2013||Google Inc.||Archive of text captures from rendered documents|
|US8505813||Sep 4, 2009||Aug 13, 2013||Bank Of America Corporation||Customer benefit offer program enrollment|
|US8515816||Apr 1, 2005||Aug 20, 2013||Google Inc.||Aggregate analysis of text captures performed by multiple users from rendered documents|
|US8537989||Feb 8, 2011||Sep 17, 2013||Tal Lavian||Device and method for providing enhanced telephony|
|US8538458||Mar 11, 2008||Sep 17, 2013||X One, Inc.||Location sharing and tracking using mobile phones or other wireless devices|
|US8548131||Mar 11, 2011||Oct 1, 2013||Tal Lavian||Systems and methods for communicating with an interactive voice response system|
|US8548135||Feb 8, 2011||Oct 1, 2013||Tal Lavian||Systems and methods for visual presentation and selection of IVR menu|
|US8553859||Feb 8, 2011||Oct 8, 2013||Tal Lavian||Device and method for providing enhanced telephony|
|US8572303||May 23, 2011||Oct 29, 2013||Tal Lavian||Portable universal communication device|
|US8577118||Oct 15, 2010||Nov 5, 2013||Mitek Systems||Systems for mobile image capture and remittance processing|
|US8582862||May 12, 2010||Nov 12, 2013||Mitek Systems||Mobile image quality assurance in mobile document image processing applications|
|US8594280||Feb 3, 2010||Nov 26, 2013||Zvi Or-Bach||Systems and methods for visual presentation and selection of IVR menu|
|US8596540 *||Jan 11, 2010||Dec 3, 2013||Eth Zurich||Method and portable apparatus for recognizing barcodes|
|US8600196||Jul 6, 2010||Dec 3, 2013||Google Inc.||Optical scanners, such as hand-held optical scanners|
|US8619147||Oct 6, 2010||Dec 31, 2013||Google Inc.||Handheld device for capturing text from both a document printed on paper and a document displayed on a dynamic display device|
|US8619287||Aug 17, 2009||Dec 31, 2013||Google Inc.||System and method for information gathering utilizing form identifiers|
|US8620058 *||Dec 4, 2012||Dec 31, 2013||Mitek Systems, Inc.||Methods for mobile image capture and processing of documents|
|US8620083||Oct 5, 2011||Dec 31, 2013||Google Inc.||Method and system for character recognition|
|US8620760||Oct 11, 2010||Dec 31, 2013||Google Inc.||Methods and systems for initiating application processes by data capture from rendered documents|
|US8621349||Oct 5, 2010||Dec 31, 2013||Google Inc.||Publishing techniques for adding value to a rendered document|
|US8625756||Feb 8, 2011||Jan 7, 2014||Tal Lavian||Systems and methods for visual presentation and selection of IVR menu|
|US8638363||Feb 18, 2010||Jan 28, 2014||Google Inc.||Automatically capturing information, such as capturing information using a document-aware device|
|US8645222||Jun 17, 2011||Feb 4, 2014||Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A.||System and methods for mobile ordering and payment|
|US8681951||Oct 18, 2011||Mar 25, 2014||Tal Lavian||Systems and methods for visual presentation and selection of IVR menu|
|US8687777||Oct 18, 2011||Apr 1, 2014||Tal Lavian||Systems and methods for visual presentation and selection of IVR menu|
|US8712441||Apr 11, 2013||Apr 29, 2014||Xone, Inc.||Methods and systems for temporarily sharing position data between mobile-device users|
|US8713418||Apr 12, 2005||Apr 29, 2014||Google Inc.||Adding value to a rendered document|
|US8725777||May 19, 2012||May 13, 2014||Trimble Navigation Limited||Object recognition and localization service using RFID|
|US8731148||Mar 2, 2012||May 20, 2014||Tal Lavian||Systems and methods for visual presentation and selection of IVR menu|
|US8750898||Jan 18, 2013||Jun 10, 2014||X One, Inc.||Methods and systems for annotating target locations|
|US8751298||May 9, 2011||Jun 10, 2014||Bank Of America Corporation||Event-driven coupon processor alert|
|US8781228||Sep 13, 2012||Jul 15, 2014||Google Inc.||Triggering actions in response to optically or acoustically capturing keywords from a rendered document|
|US8793162||May 5, 2010||Jul 29, 2014||Google Inc.||Adding information or functionality to a rendered document via association with an electronic counterpart|
|US8798593||May 7, 2013||Aug 5, 2014||X One, Inc.||Location sharing and tracking using mobile phones or other wireless devices|
|US8798645||Jan 30, 2013||Aug 5, 2014||X One, Inc.||Methods and systems for sharing position data and tracing paths between mobile-device users|
|US8798647||Oct 15, 2013||Aug 5, 2014||X One, Inc.||Tracking proximity of services provider to services consumer|
|US8799099||Sep 13, 2012||Aug 5, 2014||Google Inc.||Processing techniques for text capture from a rendered document|
|US8799303||Oct 13, 2010||Aug 5, 2014||Google Inc.||Establishing an interactive environment for rendered documents|
|US8831365||Mar 11, 2013||Sep 9, 2014||Google Inc.||Capturing text from rendered documents using supplement information|
|US8831635||Jul 21, 2011||Sep 9, 2014||X One, Inc.||Methods and apparatuses for transmission of an alert to multiple devices|
|US8856807 *||Jan 4, 2011||Oct 7, 2014||The Pnc Financial Services Group, Inc.||Alert event platform|
|US8867708||Mar 2, 2012||Oct 21, 2014||Tal Lavian||Systems and methods for visual presentation and selection of IVR menu|
|US8867838 *||Sep 13, 2012||Oct 21, 2014||Xerox Corporation||Method and system for a text data entry from an electronic document|
|US8874504||Mar 22, 2010||Oct 28, 2014||Google Inc.||Processing techniques for visual capture data from a rendered document|
|US8879698||Mar 5, 2012||Nov 4, 2014||Tal Lavian||Device and method for providing enhanced telephony|
|US8891909 *||Sep 11, 2009||Nov 18, 2014||Sony Corporation||Information processing apparatus capable of modifying images based on audio data, program and information processing method|
|US8892495||Jan 8, 2013||Nov 18, 2014||Blanding Hovenweep, Llc||Adaptive pattern recognition based controller apparatus and method and human-interface therefore|
|US8903073||Jul 20, 2011||Dec 2, 2014||Zvi Or-Bach||Systems and methods for visual presentation and selection of IVR menu|
|US8903759||Sep 21, 2010||Dec 2, 2014||Google Inc.||Determining actions involving captured information and electronic content associated with rendered documents|
|US8908969 *||Jul 31, 2012||Dec 9, 2014||Abbyy Development Llc||Creating flexible structure descriptions|
|US8953886||Aug 8, 2013||Feb 10, 2015||Google Inc.||Method and system for character recognition|
|US8965805 *||Oct 24, 2008||Feb 24, 2015||1040 Bridge Llc||Method and system for delivering and accessing files|
|US8990235||Mar 12, 2010||Mar 24, 2015||Google Inc.||Automatically providing content associated with captured information, such as information captured in real-time|
|US8995012||Nov 5, 2010||Mar 31, 2015||Rdm Corporation||System for mobile image capture and processing of financial documents|
|US9001819||Feb 18, 2010||Apr 7, 2015||Zvi Or-Bach||Systems and methods for visual presentation and selection of IVR menu|
|US9030699||Aug 13, 2013||May 12, 2015||Google Inc.||Association of a portable scanner with input/output and storage devices|
|US9031581||Nov 7, 2014||May 12, 2015||X One, Inc.||Apparatus and method for obtaining content on a cellular wireless device based on proximity to other wireless devices|
|US9075779||Apr 22, 2013||Jul 7, 2015||Google Inc.||Performing actions based on capturing information from rendered documents, such as documents under copyright|
|US9081799||Dec 6, 2010||Jul 14, 2015||Google Inc.||Using gestalt information to identify locations in printed information|
|US9116890||Jun 11, 2014||Aug 25, 2015||Google Inc.||Triggering actions in response to optically or acoustically capturing keywords from a rendered document|
|US9143638||Apr 29, 2013||Sep 22, 2015||Google Inc.||Data capture from rendered documents using handheld device|
|US9167558||Jun 12, 2014||Oct 20, 2015||X One, Inc.||Methods and systems for sharing position data between subscribers involving multiple wireless providers|
|US9176944 *||Aug 23, 2011||Nov 3, 2015||Google Inc.||Selectively processing user input|
|US9185522||Nov 7, 2014||Nov 10, 2015||X One, Inc.||Apparatus and method to transmit content to a cellular wireless device based on proximity to other wireless devices|
|US9208581||Dec 23, 2014||Dec 8, 2015||WexEbergy Innovations LLC||Method of determining measurements for designing a part utilizing a reference object and end user provided metadata|
|US9213410 *||Mar 26, 2010||Dec 15, 2015||Hewlett-Packard Development Company L.P.||Associated file|
|US9230259||May 10, 2010||Jan 5, 2016||Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A.||Systems and methods for mobile ordering and payment|
|US9230339||Jul 1, 2014||Jan 5, 2016||Wexenergy Innovations Llc||System and method of measuring distances related to an object|
|US9253616||Mar 24, 2015||Feb 2, 2016||X One, Inc.||Apparatus and method for obtaining content on a cellular wireless device based on proximity|
|US9268852||Sep 13, 2012||Feb 23, 2016||Google Inc.||Search engines and systems with handheld document data capture devices|
|US9275051||Nov 7, 2012||Mar 1, 2016||Google Inc.||Automatic modification of web pages|
|US9323784||Dec 9, 2010||Apr 26, 2016||Google Inc.||Image search using text-based elements within the contents of images|
|US9371099||Jul 19, 2011||Jun 21, 2016||The Wilfred J. and Louisette G. Lagassey Irrevocable Trust||Modular intelligent transportation system|
|US20050246351 *||Apr 30, 2004||Nov 3, 2005||Hadley Brent L||Document information mining tool|
|US20060047704 *||Aug 30, 2005||Mar 2, 2006||Kumar Chitra Gopalakrishnan||Method and system for providing information services relevant to visual imagery|
|US20060288269 *||Apr 25, 2006||Dec 21, 2006||Oppenlander Timothy J||System and method for electronic document generation and delivery|
|US20070005490 *||Sep 8, 2006||Jan 4, 2007||Gopalakrishnan Kumar C||Methods and System for Distributed E-commerce|
|US20070169060 *||Nov 16, 2006||Jul 19, 2007||Boek Karl J||Production optimization|
|US20070201093 *||Feb 24, 2006||Aug 30, 2007||Avery Dennison Corporation||Systems and methods for retrieving printable media templates|
|US20080005088 *||Jun 28, 2007||Jan 3, 2008||Sony Corporation||Monitor system, monitor device, search method, and search program|
|US20080195456 *||Sep 28, 2007||Aug 14, 2008||Dudley Fitzpatrick||Apparatuses, Methods and Systems for Coordinating Personnel Based on Profiles|
|US20080200153 *||Sep 28, 2007||Aug 21, 2008||Dudley Fitzpatrick||Apparatuses, methods and systems for code triggered information querying and serving on mobile devices based on profiles|
|US20080200160 *||Sep 28, 2007||Aug 21, 2008||Dudley Fitzpatrick||Apparatuses, Methods and Systems for Ambiguous Code-Triggered Information Querying and Serving on Mobile Devices|
|US20080201283 *||Sep 28, 2007||Aug 21, 2008||Dudley Fitzpatrick||Apparatuses, methods and systems for anticipatory information querying and serving on mobile devices based on profiles|
|US20080201310 *||Sep 28, 2007||Aug 21, 2008||Dudley Fitzpatrick||Apparatuses, Methods and Systems for Information Querying and Serving on the Internet Based on Profiles|
|US20080304747 *||Jun 8, 2007||Dec 11, 2008||Apple Inc.||Identifiers for digital media|
|US20080313035 *||Jun 13, 2007||Dec 18, 2008||Eric Peeters||System and method for providing print advertisements|
|US20080313036 *||Jun 13, 2007||Dec 18, 2008||Marc Mosko||System and method for providing advertisements in online and hardcopy mediums|
|US20090089293 *||Sep 28, 2007||Apr 2, 2009||Bccg Ventures, Llc||Selfish data browsing|
|US20090175532 *||Feb 2, 2009||Jul 9, 2009||Konstantin Zuev||Method and System for Creating Flexible Structure Descriptions|
|US20090185241 *||Dec 30, 2008||Jul 23, 2009||Grigori Nepomniachtchi||Systems for mobile image capture and processing of documents|
|US20090185736 *||Jul 23, 2009||Grigori Nepomniachtchi||Methods for mobile image capture and processing of documents|
|US20090185737 *||Jul 23, 2009||Grigori Nepomniachtchi||Systems for mobile image capture and processing of checks|
|US20090185738 *||Jul 23, 2009||Grigori Nepomniachtchi||Methods for mobile image capture and processing of checks|
|US20090193342 *||Jan 26, 2009||Jul 30, 2009||Paulo Barthelmess||System and method for document markup|
|US20100092107 *||Sep 11, 2009||Apr 15, 2010||Daisuke Mochizuki||Information processing apparatus, program and information processing method|
|US20100106640 *||Oct 24, 2008||Apr 29, 2010||Herman Meury||Method and system for delivering and accessing files|
|US20100150424 *||Mar 3, 2010||Jun 17, 2010||Mitek Systems||Systems for mobile image capture and processing of checks|
|US20100185598 *||Jan 10, 2007||Jul 22, 2010||Hannu Saarelma||Metadata associated with a printed image|
|US20100306318 *||Feb 20, 2008||Dec 2, 2010||Sfgt Inc.||Apparatuses, methods, and systems for a graphical code-serving interface|
|US20100316301 *||Jul 12, 2010||Dec 16, 2010||The Boeing Company||Method for extracting referential keys from a document|
|US20100329537 *||Jun 25, 2009||Dec 30, 2010||Gardi Michael E||Computer-implemented methods of identifying an optical character recognition (ocr) font to assist an operator in setting up a bank remittance coupon application|
|US20110091092 *||Oct 15, 2010||Apr 21, 2011||Mitek Systems||Systems for mobile image capture and remittance processing|
|US20110092251 *||Dec 22, 2010||Apr 21, 2011||Gopalakrishnan Kumar C||Providing Search Results from Visual Imagery|
|US20110093264 *||Apr 21, 2011||Kumar Gopalakrishnan||Providing Information Services Related to Multimodal Inputs|
|US20110161377 *||Jun 30, 2011||Ingram Dv Llc||System and method for correlating a first title with a second title|
|US20110194750 *||Aug 11, 2011||Mitek Systems||Methods for mobile image capture and processing of documents|
|US20110208736 *||Aug 25, 2011||Dudley Fitzpatrick||Apparatuses, methods and systems for information querying and serving on mobile devices based on ambient conditions|
|US20110297748 *||Jan 11, 2010||Dec 8, 2011||Eth Zurich||Method and portable apparatus for recognizing bar codes|
|US20110304890 *||Jun 11, 2010||Dec 15, 2011||Xerox Corporation||Method for automatic conversion of paper records to digital form|
|US20120137259 *||Mar 26, 2010||May 31, 2012||Robert Campbell||Associated file|
|US20130094751 *||Dec 4, 2012||Apr 18, 2013||Mitek Systems||Methods for mobile image capture and processing of documents|
|US20130198615 *||Jul 31, 2012||Aug 1, 2013||Abbyy Software Ltd.||Creating Flexible Structure Descriptions|
|US20140072222 *||Sep 13, 2012||Mar 13, 2014||Xerox Corporation||Method and system for a text data entry from an electronic document|
|US20140258825 *||Mar 8, 2013||Sep 11, 2014||Tuhin Ghosh||Systems and methods for automated form generation|
|US20140362417 *||Dec 19, 2012||Dec 11, 2014||Sagemcom Documents Sas||Method of pairing between a unique identifier of a device for digitizing documents and a user account identifier|
|U.S. Classification||705/27.2, 235/383, 715/222, 715/205, 382/137, 705/40, 715/255, 705/50, 382/181, 707/E17.022, 382/305, 715/209, 705/72, 707/E17.008, 707/E17.113, 235/379, 707/E17.009, 715/210, 707/999.001, 707/667, 707/999.2, 707/999.102, 707/999.104, 707/999.006|
|International Classification||G06F17/24, G06Q30/00, G06Q10/00, G06F7/00, G06F17/30|
|Cooperative Classification||H04N1/00244, G06F17/30864, G06F17/30265, G06F17/30017, G06Q30/0641, G06K9/00, G06Q30/0623, G06Q30/0601, G06F17/30619, Y10S707/99943, Y10S707/99945, G06F17/30637, Y10S707/99931, G06Q20/4012, Y10S707/99936, G06Q20/102, G06Q30/0643, G06Q20/12, G06Q30/0603, G06F17/30879, H04N1/32128, H04N2201/3278, G06K9/72, G06Q40/04, H04N1/2166, H04N2201/3277, G06F17/2235, H04N1/34, G06F17/3002, G06Q30/0207, G06F17/241, G06K2209/01, H04N2201/3249, G06F17/30047, G06Q30/0283, G06F17/30038, G06K9/2054, H04N2201/3215, G06Q10/10, G06F17/243, H04N1/00204, G06F17/30026, G06K9/2063, Y10S707/99934, H04N1/00326, G06Q30/0241, G06F17/30011, G06K9/685, G06Q50/22, H04N1/00374, G06F17/2247, G06Q30/02, H04N1/00381, G07F17/40, G06Q10/00, G06Q30/06, G06F17/30876, H04N1/00363, H04N1/0036, H04N1/2187, H04N2201/3266, G06Q30/00, H04N2201/0081, G06F17/218, H04N2201/3263, H04N1/107, G06K9/00442, G06F17/30029, H04N2201/3253, G06Q30/04, G06K17/0016, G06K9/228|
|European Classification||G06Q20/102, G06Q20/4012, G06Q30/0643, G06K9/20R, G06F17/30T2F|
|Dec 1, 2005||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: EXBIBLIO B.V., NETHERLANDS
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:KING, MARTIN T.;GROVER, DALE L.;KUSHLER, CLIFFORD A.;ANDOTHERS;REEL/FRAME:017315/0714;SIGNING DATES FROM 20050909 TO 20050916
|Feb 9, 2011||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: GOOGLE INC., CALIFORNIA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:EXBIBLIO B.V.;REEL/FRAME:025779/0251
Effective date: 20110105
|Apr 22, 2013||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4