|Publication number||US7641549 B2|
|Application number||US 10/822,484|
|Publication date||Jan 5, 2010|
|Filing date||Apr 12, 2004|
|Priority date||Apr 11, 2003|
|Also published as||US7896740, US8684827, US20040243504, US20100113135, US20110258068, US20130157749, WO2004090678A2, WO2004090678A3|
|Publication number||10822484, 822484, US 7641549 B2, US 7641549B2, US-B2-7641549, US7641549 B2, US7641549B2|
|Inventors||Joseph M. Asher, Dominic Crosthwaite, Howard W. Lutnick|
|Original Assignee||Cantor Index Llc|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (109), Non-Patent Citations (101), Referenced by (12), Classifications (24), Legal Events (2)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
This application is related to and claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/462,176 filed Apr. 11, 2003.
This invention relates in general to exchange platforms and, more particularly, to a system and method for an exchange platform for trading entries in a tournament.
Exchange systems exist for trading assets. A known system provides a platform for trading shares of stock in various companies. The platform enables purchasers and sellers of the assets to make and accept offers to sell and/or offers to buy the assets from one another. The system then facilitates the transaction between the buyer and the seller. The NASDAQ is an example of such a system.
In a typical auction, such as an automobile auction, for example, an item is made available for bidding. Various participants place bids for the item. Typically, there will be a starting bid proposed by an auctioneer. The starting bid may be a minimum acceptable bid. One participant may place the starting bid. Other participants may place subsequent bids, each subsequent bid being higher than the previous bid. At the end of the bidding period, or if there is a point at which no participants wish to make a higher bid than the present bid, the highest bidder purchases the item for the bid price.
Many states have lottery systems, by which participants purchase entries in the lottery. The money paid for the entries is pooled and a portion of the pooled money is paid to winners based on fixed odds or based on the number of winners in a pooled game. The winner may be determined by matching randomly drawn numbers to a series of numbers on lottery tickets given to the participants in exchange for the entry purchase price.
Tournaments are among the various sports competitions. The NCAA basketball tournament, for example, is held from mid-March to early-April each year. It involves sixty-four teams in an elimination style format and is among the most widely bet sporting events in the United States. Many thousands of people bet on the tournament in some form or another. One of the most popular forms of betting is in a “bracketed pool” where, prior to the beginning of the tournament, individuals attempt to select the winners of each game played throughout the tournament and points are awarded depending on the stage of the tournament (i.e. more points are awarded for later games in the tournament than earlier games). All of the participants pay a single entry fee (i.e. $5, $10 or even $100) and fill out a tournament grid. The NCAA tournament bracket is published in newspapers nationwide and on the Internet and numerous pools are created in offices and among friends.
Among other things, the present invention provides an exchange system and method according to which interests in entries in an activity may b transferred between users. The entries, or interests therein, may be first distributed, for example, according to a lottery or an auction.
In one embodiment, a method includes distributing a first set of entries in at least one activity and conducting after market trading of at least one of the entries between at least one buyer and at least one seller. The after market trading may include receiving, from a first user, at least one buy request associated with at least one entry of the first set of entries. At least one sell request associated with the at least one entry of the first set of entries may be received from a second user. The at least one buy request may be matched with the at least one sell request. The at least one entry of the first set of entries may be transferred from the second user to the first user. In another embodiment, the after market trading may include conducting a short sale of the at least one entry.
In another embodiment, an exchange system is provided for conducting the exchange of an interest in at least one entry in an activity. The system includes a processor operable to transfer the interest from a first user to a second user.
Various embodiments of the present invention may benefit from numerous advantages. It should be noted that one or more embodiments may benefit from some, none, or all of the advantages discussed below. One advantage is the ability to transfer interests in entries in an activity between users in a market exchange environment. Another advantage is to enable an electronic trading platform for the exchange of entries (or interests therein) in activities. Another advantage is that entries may be distributed by way of a lottery or an auction and then traded in a after market, where the market value of each entry may vary from the initial price paid for the entry. Other advantages will be readily apparent to one having ordinary skill in the art from the following figures, descriptions, and claims.
For a more complete understanding of the present invention and for further features and advantages, reference is now made to the following description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
In accordance with example embodiments of the invention, methods and systems are provided for distributing and exchanging entries in one or more activities. By way of example only, the following description will refer to entries as being the teams in a sixty-four-team NCAA basketball tournament, and the activity as being the tournament itself. The systems and methods described herein also determine winning entries. By way of example only, the description will discuss a winning entry as being the team that wins the NCAA basketball tournament.
These are examples only. The scope of the invention is intended to cover any, suitable, activities, entries, winning entries, events, parameters, etc. Activities may include, without limitation, any activity for which one or more winning entry may be determined. For example, activities may include sporting competitions, entertainment competitions, political elections, financial market performance, and the like. Entries may include teams, individuals, events, or any other designation for which one or more winning entries may be determined based on the outcome of the activity or the occurrence of an event associated with an activity. Parameters may include any parameter, event, condition, or the like that may impact the activity, the entry, or the distribution or exchange of entries. Parameters may be associated with users, entries, activities, or the exchange system, for example. Events may include any event for which a determination is made to take an action. The event may be the occurrence of an event within an activity, the end of an activity, a time, or the occurrence of a value associated with a parameter, for example. Actions include any actions required for the operation of the various described systems and methods. Actions may include, for example, distribution of entries, receipt or communication of buy and sell requests by users, matching of buy and sell requests, exchange of entries, payment and receipt of funds for the exchange of entries or any other service provided by the exchange systems and methods, determination and communication of exchange data and information, and payouts for winning entries.
For entries to be exchanged, at least one entry must be distributed. In accordance with various embodiments, entries may be distributed by an suitable method. For example, entries may be distributed according to a lottery, an auction, a sale, or any other similar process. Preferably, entries are distributed to users who may later participate in exchanging entries with one another, or with other users who did not receive entries during the distribution. A user may be an individual, a consortium, a company, a trust, a computer, or any other entity that may be associated with an entry.
By way of example only,
Obviously, some teams will have a better chance to win the tournament and, therefore, will have a higher value than others. All teams are immediately able to be bought and sold, either to other users already participating in the pool or to others not participating, for whatever price the market will bear (considering that the owner(s) of the winning team(s) will win all or a portion of $6,400). A strong team such as Duke or Kansas might command a price of $2,000 or more, while a weak team might command a price of only $5 or $10. In one embodiment, entries may be bought and sold at any time throughout the tournament, right up to the final minute of the final game. Alternatively, exchange of entries might be limited to a certain time period, the beginning and end of which may be determined according to any criteria. The current buy and sell prices are preferably listed or displayed in connection with an exchange, described in greater detail below.
In step 110, at least a first user establishes an account. Preferably, multiple users establish accounts. The accounts are established for a number of purposes, including associating a user identity with each entry to designate which owners own which entries. The accounts may also be used to conduct payment transactions. Accounts may be established according to any suitable process. In one embodiment, a user requests that an account be established for a certain amount of money. The user may immediately fund the account by way of, for example, an electronic debit of the user's checking account, or by use of a credit card. Optionally, accounts may be established base on credit extended to the user. In the case of an extension of credit, the applicant user's creditworthiness is preferably checked to meet certain criteria prior to the establishment of the account.
In step 112, a first user places a buy request. The buy request may include, for example, the identification of an entry and the requested purchase price. In step 114, a second user places a sell request. The sell request may include, for example, the identification of an entry and the requested sell price. Users may submit single or multiple buy and sell requests at a given time. Alternatively, the system may be configured to require that each buy or sell request be made separately.
In addition to buying or selling an entry, users may make a request to sell short (and/or buy long). For instance, a user may request to sell short an entry they do not own any time they think it is overpriced. If a user completes a short sale, then the user is appropriately associated with the entry being sold short and at the determining event (e.g., at the end of the tournament) a determination is made whether the user owes money or is due money in addition to a payout from the pool. For example, assuming a user sees that Oklahoma is trading at $2,000, the user might consider that entry to be overpriced. In other words, given the user's assessment of the chances that Oklahoma will win the tournament, the user believes that $2,000 is too much to pay for an Oklahoma entry. The user may attempt to sell short sell Oklahoma short at $2,000 (even though the user does not own the Oklahoma entry). Another user may purchase Oklahoma at $2,000 (the actual market price). Then the short seller must cover his short position at a future time, when he hopes the price for Oklahoma will have fallen. For example, if at the time he covers his short position, the price of Oklahoma is $1,800, then he will have profited $200.
In the event of a short-sale, the short-seller preferably posts a margin commensurate with the imputed risk. Margin requirements are based, at least in part, on the total possible loss (i.e. 60% of the total pool where second and third place finishers are paid; 100% of the total pool where only the winner is paid), and can be weighted to reflect event-specific details (such as the perceived odds of winning and, therefore, risk of loss to the house or other entity providing the team for short-sale). Since the short seller is responsible for paying any resulting winnings attributable to that team (akin to a stock short-seller being responsible for dividends), margin requirements can also reflect the fact that in multiple-team payoff pools (i.e. second-fourth place teams are paid), there is an added risk of loss than in a single-team (all to winner) payoff pool.
The pool can be structured such that a participant buys all sixty-four teams in the tournament (or some lesser amount) and then sells the teams he does not wish to keep, thereby reducing the cost of his purchase. A participant then has the option of buying from the house at the start of the tournament or buying preferred teams on the trading exchange (or directly from an owner where permitted), a choice that can be made after consideration of, among other things, the perceived value of the preferred teams and non-preferred teams and their current trading prices.
In step 116, buy requests are matched with sell requests. Matching can be accomplished by any suitable method. In one embodiment the match only occurs if the buy request entry matches a sell request entry and the associated buy price equals the associated sell price. The buy and sell prices do not, however, have to be equal in all embodiments, and matches may be made according to certain predetermined considerations even if the buy and sell prices are not equal. This is described in greater detail below. However, one example would be where a match occurs if the buy and sell prices differ by less than a certain amount. In such a case a transaction (or exchange) may be made at the buy price, the sell price, or at another price (such as half way between the buy and sell prices, for example). This may be useful, for instance, if a seller would prefer to get a certain price for his entry but would accept a lesser amount, and a corresponding buyer would prefer to buy an entry for a certain amount (which is less than the sell price), but would agree to buy the entry for an amount greater than the buy request price.
Further, in accordance with another embodiment, a buyer need not specify an entry, but rather may specify only a buy request price. In such a case, a match may occur so long as there is any entry available at the buy price (or some other acceptable price. These are examples only, and it can be appreciated that numerous scenarios may exist where buyers and sellers are matched to result in an exchange of one or more entries at specific or determined prices. The present invention encompasses all exchange scenarios that may occur in connection with the exchange of other assets, such as the trading of stocks on the NASDAQ.
As discussed, the value of entries being managed by the exchange systems and methods described herein may change according to the dictates of the market. The market may dictate, according to any number of factors, what is an acceptable buy or sell request price. It is envisioned that as an activity (such as a basketball tournament) progresses, the market price for entries will change. Preferably, entries that have been eliminated from the tournament receive a designation of a zero value immediately upon elimination. The market value of the other entries will increase or decrease based upon their performance at various stages of the activity (e.g., in each game of the tournament) and other factors such as injuries, weather, changes in venue, and other factors which may effect the performance of an entry in the activity. Market value may also be affected by indirect factors that are unrelated to entry performance, such as trends in popularity.
At step 118, the tournament concludes, and the holder of the winning entry receives a payout. The payout can be determined according to any suitable method. For example, the payout can be all or a portion of the pool of entry fees. The payout can be some other fixed amount. The payout can be an amount from which is deducted a commission or takeout. A takeout might be deducted, for example, by a host which operates the exchange. The takeout or commission can be determined according to any suitable method. For instance, the takeout might be determined as a percentage of the initial pool of entry fees (say 10%) or on the basis of a fee per exchange, or per dollar amount of exchanges (e.g., 2% of each trade).
In order to facilitate bids, lottery purchases, and exchanges, a host of the exchange could establish a minimum guaranteed prize amount. For example, the host of the pool could guarantee that the minimum prize to the winner would be $1,000, and then bidding on the various teams would reflect that the successful bidder for one of those teams stood to win that amount of prize money (e.g., a strong tournament favorite might command a bid in excess of $500 if the winning bidder was guaranteed $1,000 if the team won the tournament, which, in turn, could be expected to generate additional bidding on other teams by those who did not expect the favorite to win).
It should be recognized that there may be more than one “winning” entry. For example, payouts may be made to the first, second, and third-place entry teams in a tournament. Similarly, there may be more than one time or event at which a payout is determined for a given entry. For example, a single entry may “win” at the end of each stage in a tournament or at the end of each quarter in a football game.
There may also be numerous pools for each activity. With respect to an NCAA tournament, for example, there may be many distributions of the same entries. This is preferable such that entries (e.g., basketball teams) will be traded regularly and no one team is unavailable. One person may own the same team in multiple pools, or may own different teams in the same pool. There may be multiple instances of the same activity for which the entry opportunity price varies. For example, there may be a $5 pool, $10 pool, $20 pool, $50, $100 pool, and $500 pool for one tournament. Various prizes and/or money may be awarded in varying prize formats. For instance, some pools may only pay money to the winner, while other pools may pay the owners of the top two, three or four teams (the final four), with the winning team receiving more than the second, which receives more than the third, etc. (e.g., of a $6,400 pool, 60% goes to the winner, 20% to second, 12% to third and 8% to fourth). Prizes do not have to be cash, but can be anything that has a value, such as memorabilia, merchandise, points, airline miles, services, etc. Players may choose to participate in pools according to their risk tolerance and desire to be paid in the event their team finishes among the final four, rather than only if it wins. They will decide to participate in the after-market in the various pools based on the above, along with the going price for the team(s) they desire.
Moreover, distribution and exchange of entries in multiple, differing types of activities may occur. For example, a single exchange system or method may incorporate a basketball tournament, a reality television contest, a political race, and two football games.
In at least one embodiment, the exchange method incorporates odds. For example, an entry may have associated odds at the time of the initial distribution. In such a case, for instance, one entry may pay a certain amount if it wins and the entry with odds might pay 2-1, or double the amount of the other entry. Odds may also be attached to entries being exchanged. The odds may be provided by the exchange or the user. Likewise, the risk associated with providing odds may be the responsibility of the exchange or the user.
According to another embodiment, another type of initial distribution is the auction approach. This may be used as a substitute for the lottery approach, as an addition to the lottery approach, or as a substitute for/addition to any other distribution approach. According to the lottery approach, entries are auctioned off to the highest bidder prior (or according to any other criteria), preferably prior to the start of the activity. The amount someone is willing to pay for an entry is reflective of his view of that entry's chances of winning, in addition to the total value of the potential payout. After the closing of the auction, users may buy and sell entries as already described above.
According to one embodiment, the distribution techniques may be incorporated into the after-market exchange trading. For example, once entries have been initially distributed, a user may make his entry available to the highest bidder from the market. The selling user might require a minimum bid, and any other auction techniques may be used.
The exchange activities may be hosted in any number of formats. For example, the exchange may be embodied in an electronic exchange system via the Internet or on a closed-loop system. An electronic exchange may list all of the pools, showing each of the entries and their current prices, as well as other pertinent information. Links to websites with tournament statistics, injury reports and other relevant matters can be provided. Users can input their initial entry or trades through a standard personal computer or other similar device. Alternatively, and where it is illegal to offer sports betting over Internet, the exchange can be hosted in a casino sportsbook or other legalized gambling establishment, either in a “trading pit” or by registering bids and offers with a teller or through a self-service betting terminal. Such a self-service betting terminal can be provided throughout a facility, including in casino hotel rooms through the television (in a manner similar to check out services currently provided, where the remote control device or a computer keyboard is utilized). The current prices and other information could be displayed on closed-circuit television monitors, information boards, or other appropriate displays. Hosting can also enable remote, wireless participation through the use of a cellular network or a virtual private network.
According to another example embodiment, as shown in
System 10 can manage transactions concerning entries in any suitable activity. Activities may include, for example, competitions. Competitions may include, for example, tournaments, such as basketball, bowling, soccer, cricket, tennis and golf tournaments. Competitions may also include races such as horse races, dog races, auto races, etc. Competitions may also include single game competitions such as baseball, basketball, football, hockey, soccer, etc. Competitions may also include non-sports competitions. Examples of non-sports competitions may include, for instance, entertainment competitions, such as the Oscars, Grammys, Emmys, box office rankings, or reality television competitions (e.g., Survivor or American Idol). Non-sports competitions may also include other competitions such as political elections. The activities handled by system 10 can also include other suitable activities that are not competitions per se. Any activity that has multiple entrants may be managed by system 10.
System 10 may function as an exchange for entries, such as entries in a tournament. In such a case, the winning entry would be determined at the end of the activity (in this case, the tournament). Alternatively, system 10 may serve as an exchange for events, which may be based upon a given time or some other criterion. For example, in a single game competition, such as a football game, the entries might include a single digit. The exchange would manage transactions of the single digit. The “winning” single digit might be determined based on the last number in the total score of the two football teams at the end of each quarter. Thus, the term “entries” as used herein, does not necessarily imply “participants” or teams in a competition. Rather, an entry is any designation that may be determined at any point in, or based on any criterion in, an activity. Likewise, a winning entry does not necessarily mean the winner of a particular competition. Rather, a winning entry may be determined based on any criterion, such as a predetermined number, predetermined time, or the occurrence of an event.
In an example embodiment, system 10 may be configured to handle the initial distribution of the entries. This may be accomplished according to the lottery and/or auction methods already discussed, or according to any other suitable method. Once entries for the activity have been initially distributed, the system 10 manages the exchange of the entries. For example, in a basketball tournament, the entries may be the respective participating teams. The winning entry may be the team that wins the entire tournament. System 10 allows users, through clients 20, to conduct transactions involving the exchange of entries before or during the tournament. Each entry will have an associated price. Preferably, the price is determined by the market. However, the price may be determined based on any factor or set of factors. The price may also be artificially set. System 10 may be configured to receive, from a first user, an offer to sell an entry at a first price. System 10 may be similarly operable to receive, from a second user, an offer to buy an entry at a second price. The first and second prices may have any relationship including one being less than, equal to, or greater than the other. For example, the first price (sell price) might be $100. The second price (buy price) might be $90. System 10 may match a buy price and a sell price with each other to initiate an exchange based on any suitable criterion. For instance if the buy price and sell price are within a certain range of one another, system 10 may initiate an exchange at the buy price, at the sell price, or at some other price determined according to any suitable method. For example, if system 10 might be configured to initiate an exchange of the entry at a price half way between the buy and sell price (i.e., $95). The range between the buy and sell prices at which system 10 will initiate a transaction may be a fixed or variable amount, and may be predetermined based on any number of considerations (such as the average price of the entries), or may be determined by some other method (such as whether the range is less than a predetermined percentage of the sell price). Of course, these are examples only and the buy and sell prices might be equal, or the buy price might be higher than the sell price. System 10 might also require that the buy and sell prices be equal prior to initiating an exchange. Further, even if the buy and sell prices are equal (or otherwise meet a certain range criterion), system 10 may be configured to not initiate an exchange of the entry unless one or more additional criteria are met.
System 10 is preferably operable to manage multiple transactions for multiple entries in multiple activities. For example, there may be a plurality of buyers and sellers, each attempting to buy or sell multiple entries in a basketball tournament and multiple entries in a horse race. Moreover, for any single activity, such as a basketball tournament for example, system 10 manages transactions involving multiple instances of the same entry. For instance, in an NCAA basketball tournament, if the “entries” are the individual teams, then there are sixty-four entries. System 10 preferably manages multiple instances of each of the sixty-four teams. This might be the case if there is an initial distribution of the sixty-four teams, followed by a second distribution of the sixty-four teams. Each team would have two entries in the system (one for each of the distributions). If the teams were designated as numbers 1-64, and if the distributions were designated as a, b, c and so on, then there would be an entry 1 a, 1 b, 1 c . . . 1 n, 2 a, 2 b, 2 c . . . 2 n, 3 a, 3 b, 3 c . . . 3 n, and so on up to entry 64 n (n being determined by the number of distributions). In the case of multiple distributions, the assets accumulated from the initial distribution may be either pooled or segregated, as desired.
In the example of a single distribution of entries in an NCAA tournament, the entries would be initially distributed as described elsewhere herein. At a later time, if a first user wanted to purchase an entry, he would use client 20 to communicate his purchase request to exchange platform 16 via exchange system interface 14. Exchange platform would then determine whether there is any action necessary with respect to the purchase request. For example, exchange platform 16 might first determine whether the purchase request is valid or meets certain parameters. For instance, if the purchase request is for a team that is not in the tournament, then the request would not be valid. If the purchase request only provided the desired entry, but without a purchase price, the request would similarly be invalid. Exchange platform 16 might be configured to require certain credit, password, identity, and/or location information. If any of this information is either not provided, or determined to be insufficient, then exchange platform 16 makes a determination that the purchase request does not meet the required parameters. Assuming the purchase request is valid, then the exchange platform 16 communicates a display instruction to exchange interface 14, according to which exchange interface 14 displays the purchase request so that potential sellers may see the request and respond with a different purchase request or a sell request. These follow up requests need not wait until the first user's purchase request, however.
Similarly, a second user may communicate a sell request to exchange platform 16 via exchange interface 14. Again, exchange platform 16 may make a determination as to what, if any, action to take in response to the second user's sell request. As described above, one possible result is that the sell request is validated and a display instruction is sent to the exchange interface 14.
In response to any sell or purchase request, exchange platform 16 may determine that the appropriate action is to initiate an exchange of an entry between a particular seller and a particular buyer. This may be determined according to any of the possible scenarios already described elsewhere herein. Once an exchange is initiated, exchange platform 16 conducts the exchange and notifies the buyer and the seller. In one embodiment, the exchange platform 16 conducts the exchange by removing a seller's identifier from, and attaching a buyer's identifier to, a digital representation of the entry. Other methods of actually conducting the transfer of an entry may be incorporated. The transfer may be conducted in response to any number of events including confirmation from the buyer and seller and/or the buyer transmitting appropriate payment instructions.
Payment may be conducted by any suitable method, such as by the use of a debit or credit account, electronic check, or requests to transfer funds from or to a pre-established user account. Thus, the payments may be made manually, or electronically from an account resident within system 10 or external to system 10. For example, if payment is by a debit card, the buyer would enter the appropriate bank information (such as debit card number, expiration date, bank routing number and bank account number). An electronic connection would be established between system 10 and the buyer's bank to conduct the transfer of funds from the buyer's account to an account managed by, or in connection with, system 10. Receipt of funds by a seller are effected in a similar manner.
Exchange system interfaces 14 may include any suitable interface between a client 20 and exchange system platform 16. For example, exchange system interface 14 may comprise a kiosk 26, and automatic teller machine (ATM) 28, a handheld communication device 29 (such as a mobile telephone or a personal data assistant (PDA), one or more telephone operators 34, an Internet exchange provider 46 (via one or more servers, for example), or one or more website(s) 36.
For example, in the case of kiosk 26, a user might purchase entry opportunities, make bids, or otherwise participate in the distribution of entries. The user might also place buy and/or sell requests, retrieve market information, view ancillary information (such as advertising and retail information), and make or receive payments (or confirmation of payments) for transactions. The user might also be able to receive a printout of a particular transaction or of the user's account activity (e.g., showing all of the entries purchased and sold, along with time and price information, for a particular activity, such as a tournament).
Clients 20 may access or communicate with such non-physical interfaces via one or more communication networks 44. Communication networks 44 may include one or more servers, routers, switches, repeaters, backbones, links and/or any other appropriate type of communication devices coupled by links such as wire line, optical, wireless, or other appropriate links. In general, communication network 44 may include any interconnection found on any communication network, such as a telephone network, a local area network (LAN), metropolitan area network (MAN), wide area network (WAN), the Internet, portions of the Internet, or any other data exchange system. To access exchange system interface 14 using communication networks 44, clients 20 may use a computer, a personal digital assistant (PDA), a cell-phone, a remote paging device, an electronic mail communication device, a handheld betting device, or any other suitable mobile device. In certain embodiments, clients 20 may receive any suitable information from exchange platform 16 via mobile devices using, for example, communication networks 44 and exchange system interfaces 14.
System 10 may incorporate one or more servers (not explicitly shown), which may host one or more of the exchange system interfaces 14 (such as a website) and which may also host exchange system platform 16 in some embodiments. In some embodiments, information available to clients 20 via an exchange system interface 14 may be updated substantially in real time or at preset intervals (such as every 30 seconds, for example) as new communications are made between users and exchange system platform 16 and/or as information regarding the events, exchange parameters, or activities changes, for example.
In some embodiments, one or more websites 36 may be provided by, or associated with, an Internet exchange provider 46, for example. Internet exchange provider 46 may provide Internet account management by providing online exchange accounts to one or more users. Using an online exchange account, a user may interface with one or more websites 36 associated with the Internet exchange provider 46 in order to fund the account, view exchange information regarding exchange activities, entries and events, and place buy and sell requests. Such online exchange accounts may include one or more various types of accounts, such as deposit accounts, credit accounts, stop-loss accounts, and hybrid accounts, for example.
As shown in
Processor 38 may comprise any suitable processor that executes one or more exchange system software applications 42 or other computer instructions, such as a central processing unit (CPU) or other microprocessor, and may include any suitable number of processors working together. Memory 40 may comprise one or more memory devices suitable to facilitate execution of the computer instructions, such as one or more random access memories (RAMs), read-only memories (ROMs), dynamic random access memories (DRAMs), fast cycle RAMs (FCRAMs), static RAM (SRAMs), field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), erasable programmable read-only memories (EPROMs), electrically erasable programmable read-only memories (EEPROMs), microcontrollers, or microprocessors.
Memory 40 is generally operable to store various information that may be used by processor 38 in determining actions to take in response to communications from clients 20, and to manage any information necessary for the function of system 10. For example, memory 40 may comprise any suitable number of databases, which may be co-located or physically and/or geographically distributed. In the example shown in
The various event or activity parameters may include, without limitation, any parameters which impact the operation of the exchange, such as, for example, the type of activity and/or event, the time, date and location of the activity and/or event, the number (or in some cases, the name) of each of the entries, the identity of the users, the manner in which the exchange is accessed (such as via telephone, the Internet, or kiosk, for example), the type of request, commission rates or takeouts, entry and pricing information associated with the request.
Activity results 64 may comprise various data regarding the results of one or more activities, such as the final position of each entry in a competition, whether there was a tie for any position and/or whether entry did not finish the activity, for example. User results 66 may comprise various data regarding the results of various buy and sell requests and payout information, such as the identity of the user who has a winning entry, the determined payout for the entry and/or whether the payout was distributed to the user, for example.
As discussed above, one or more communication networks 18 couple and facilitate wireless or wireline communication between one or more exchange system interfaces 14 and exchange system platform 16. Each communication network 18 may include one or more servers, routers, switches, repeaters, backbones, links and/or any other appropriate type of communication devices coupled by links such as wire line, optical, wireless, or other appropriate links. In general, each communication network 18 may include any interconnection found on any communication network, such as a local area network (LAN), metropolitan area network (MAN), wide area network (WAN), the Internet, portions of the Internet, or any other data exchange system.
As discussed above, processor 38 is operable to execute exchange system software applications 42. Processor 38 may execute applications 42 based on data received from memory 40 and/or one or more exchange system interfaces 14. In addition, processor 38 may update exchange system data based on new information being received by exchange system platform 16. In some embodiments, processor 38 may update data in real time, substantially in real time, or at preset intervals (such as every thirty seconds, for example).
As shown in
Although embodiments of the invention and their advantages are described in detail, a person skilled in the art could make various alterations, additions, and omissions without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention as defined by the appended claims.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3499646||Dec 20, 1967||Mar 10, 1970||Clifford E Segal||Apparatus for playing a game of stock speculation|
|US3573747||Feb 24, 1969||Apr 6, 1971||Institutional Networks Corp||Instinet communication system for effectuating the sale or exchange of fungible properties between subscribers|
|US3581072||Mar 28, 1968||May 25, 1971||Frederick Nymeyer||Auction market computation system|
|US4363489||Oct 17, 1980||Dec 14, 1982||Mattel, Inc.||Electronic stock market terminal game|
|US4378942||Dec 19, 1980||Apr 5, 1983||Isaac Paul J||Trading game|
|US4412287||Sep 15, 1982||Oct 25, 1983||Braddock Iii Walter D||Automated stock exchange|
|US4597046||Sep 30, 1982||Jun 24, 1986||Merrill Lynch, Pierce Fenner & Smith||Securities brokerage-cash management system obviating float costs by anticipatory liquidation of short term assets|
|US4674044||Jan 30, 1985||Jun 16, 1987||Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.||Automated securities trading system|
|US4823265||May 11, 1987||Apr 18, 1989||Nelson George E||Renewable option accounting and marketing system|
|US4874177||May 30, 1984||Oct 17, 1989||Girardin Ronald E||Horse racing game|
|US4903201||Nov 3, 1983||Feb 20, 1990||World Energy Exchange Corporation||Automated futures trading exchange|
|US4918603||Aug 1, 1988||Apr 17, 1990||Michael B. Hughes||Computerized statistical football game|
|US4962950||Oct 13, 1989||Oct 16, 1990||Champion Joseph S||Apparatus for increasing attendance at parimutuel events|
|US4980826||Mar 19, 1984||Dec 25, 1990||World Energy Exchange Corporation||Voice actuated automated futures trading exchange|
|US5077665||May 25, 1989||Dec 31, 1991||Reuters Limited||Distributed matching system|
|US5101353||May 31, 1989||Mar 31, 1992||Lattice Investments, Inc.||Automated system for providing liquidity to securities markets|
|US5108115||Oct 15, 1990||Apr 28, 1992||Robert Berman||Interactive game show and method for achieving interactive communication therewith|
|US5136501||May 26, 1989||Aug 4, 1992||Reuters Limited||Anonymous matching system|
|US5237500||Feb 27, 1990||Aug 17, 1993||Realvalue Corporation||System and process for converting constant dollar financial instruments|
|US5270922||Jun 27, 1991||Dec 14, 1993||Merrill Lynch & Company, Inc.||System for distributing, processing and displaying financial information|
|US5297032||Feb 1, 1991||Mar 22, 1994||Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated||Securities trading workstation|
|US5375055||Feb 3, 1992||Dec 20, 1994||Foreign Exchange Transaction Services, Inc.||Credit management for electronic brokerage system|
|US5497317||Dec 28, 1993||Mar 5, 1996||Thomson Trading Services, Inc.||Device and method for improving the speed and reliability of security trade settlements|
|US5508731||Feb 25, 1993||Apr 16, 1996||Response Reward Systems L.C.||Generation of enlarged participatory broadcast audience|
|US5508913||Mar 18, 1994||Apr 16, 1996||Fujitsu Limited||Electronic automatic offer matching system for freezer exchange transactions among banks|
|US5537314||Feb 23, 1995||Jul 16, 1996||First Marketrust Intl.||Referral recognition system for an incentive award program|
|US5557517||Jul 29, 1994||Sep 17, 1996||Daughterty, Iii; Vergil L.||System and method for determining the price of an expirationless American option and issuing a buy or sell ticket on the current price and portfolio|
|US5573244||Feb 28, 1994||Nov 12, 1996||International Sports Wagering, Inc.||System and method for wagering at fixed handicaps and/or odds on a sports event|
|US5586937||May 19, 1994||Dec 24, 1996||Menashe; Julian||Interactive, computerised gaming system with remote terminals|
|US5689652||Apr 27, 1995||Nov 18, 1997||Optimark Technologies, Inc.||Crossing network utilizing optimal mutual satisfaction density profile|
|US5692233||Feb 3, 1995||Nov 25, 1997||Financial Engineering Associates, Inc.||Integrated system and method for analyzing derivative securities|
|US5713793||Apr 5, 1996||Feb 3, 1998||Oris, L.L.C.||Sporting event options market trading game|
|US5724524||Dec 15, 1995||Mar 3, 1998||Pitney Bowes, Inc.||Method and system for listing, brokering, and exchanging carrier capacity|
|US5727165||Dec 27, 1994||Mar 10, 1998||Reuters Limited||Offer matching system having timed match acknowledgment|
|US5743525||Jul 1, 1996||Apr 28, 1998||Haddad; George N.||Sporting event wagering system|
|US5794219 *||Feb 20, 1996||Aug 11, 1998||Health Hero Network, Inc.||Method of conducting an on-line auction with bid pooling|
|US5806048||Oct 12, 1995||Sep 8, 1998||Mopex, Inc.||Open end mutual fund securitization process|
|US5819237||Feb 13, 1996||Oct 6, 1998||Financial Engineering Associates, Inc.||System and method for determination of incremental value at risk for securities trading|
|US5819238||Dec 13, 1996||Oct 6, 1998||Enhanced Investment Technologies, Inc.||Apparatus and accompanying methods for automatically modifying a financial portfolio through dynamic re-weighting based on a non-constant function of current capitalization weights|
|US5826241||Sep 16, 1994||Oct 20, 1998||First Virtual Holdings Incorporated||Computerized system for making payments and authenticating transactions over the internet|
|US5845266||Dec 12, 1995||Dec 1, 1998||Optimark Technologies, Inc.||Crossing network utilizing satisfaction density profile with price discovery features|
|US5846132||Apr 10, 1996||Dec 8, 1998||William W. Junkin Trust||Interactive system allowing simulated or real time participation in a league|
|US5888136||Mar 13, 1997||Mar 30, 1999||Herbert; Richard A.||Wagering system and method of wagering|
|US5905974||Dec 13, 1996||May 18, 1999||Cantor Fitzgerald Securities||Automated auction protocol processor|
|US5913203||Oct 3, 1996||Jun 15, 1999||Jaesent Inc.||System and method for pseudo cash transactions|
|US5924082||Jun 7, 1995||Jul 13, 1999||Geneva Branch Of Reuters Transaction Services Limited||Negotiated matching system|
|US5950176||Mar 25, 1996||Sep 7, 1999||Hsx, Inc.||Computer-implemented securities trading system with a virtual specialist function|
|US5950177||Jul 15, 1997||Sep 7, 1999||Optimark Technologies, Inc.||Crossing network utilizing optimal mutual satisfaction density profile|
|US6012046||Oct 16, 1997||Jan 4, 2000||Optimark Technologies, Inc.||Crossing network utilizing satisfaction density profile with price discovery features|
|US6014643||Aug 26, 1996||Jan 11, 2000||Minton; Vernon F.||Interactive securities trading system|
|US6016483||Sep 20, 1996||Jan 18, 2000||Optimark Technologies, Inc.||Method and apparatus for automated opening of options exchange|
|US6021397||Dec 2, 1997||Feb 1, 2000||Financial Engines, Inc.||Financial advisory system|
|US6023685 *||May 23, 1997||Feb 8, 2000||Brett; Kenton F.||Computer controlled event ticket auctioning system|
|US6026388||Aug 14, 1996||Feb 15, 2000||Textwise, Llc||User interface and other enhancements for natural language information retrieval system and method|
|US6029146||Aug 21, 1996||Feb 22, 2000||Crossmar, Inc.||Method and apparatus for trading securities electronically|
|US6058379||Jul 11, 1997||May 2, 2000||Auction Source, L.L.C.||Real-time network exchange with seller specified exchange parameters and interactive seller participation|
|US6067532||Jul 14, 1998||May 23, 2000||American Express Travel Related Services Company Inc.||Ticket redistribution system|
|US6088685||Aug 27, 1998||Jul 11, 2000||Mopex, Inc.||Open end mutual fund securitization process|
|US6113492||Jun 30, 1997||Sep 5, 2000||Walker Digital, Llc||Gaming device for operating in a reverse payout mode and a method of operating same|
|US6120376||Mar 10, 1998||Sep 19, 2000||Horse Sense Corporation||Wagering game based on ranking order of game participants|
|US6126543||Jan 8, 1998||Oct 3, 2000||Innovative Gaming Systems Ltd||Method for wagering on combined point spreads from multiple contests|
|US6152822||Jan 15, 1998||Nov 28, 2000||Herbert; Richard A.||Wagering system and method of wagering|
|US6236900||May 3, 1999||May 22, 2001||Michael P. Geiger||Method and system for internet-based, competitive event prediction|
|US6240396 *||Sep 4, 1997||May 29, 2001||Priceline.Com Incorporated||Conditional purchase offer management system for event tickets|
|US6260024 *||Dec 2, 1998||Jul 10, 2001||Gary Shkedy||Method and apparatus for facilitating buyer-driven purchase orders on a commercial network system|
|US6263321||Mar 4, 1999||Jul 17, 2001||Economic Inventions, Llc||Apparatus and process for calculating an option|
|US6296569||Oct 17, 2000||Oct 2, 2001||Philip Congello, Jr.||Fractional denomination gaming system and method of playing|
|US6309307||Aug 20, 1999||Oct 30, 2001||Lawrence A. Krause||Casino/lottery/sports styled wagers and games for parimutuel racing operations|
|US6325721||Jun 13, 2000||Dec 4, 2001||Teletech Company, Ltd.||Method for forecasting ranking of racing contests|
|US6331148||Mar 12, 1999||Dec 18, 2001||Lawrence Alan Krause||Casino/lottery/sports styled wagers and games for parimutuel operation|
|US6347086||Sep 4, 1998||Feb 12, 2002||Richard B. Strachan||Pick pools system and method using packet-switched network|
|US6358150||May 30, 2000||Mar 19, 2002||Racetech Llc||Methods and apparatus for parimutuel historical gaming|
|US6371855||Sep 8, 2000||Apr 16, 2002||Winamax.Com Limited||Fantasy internet sports game|
|US6443841||May 11, 1998||Sep 3, 2002||Michael T. Rossides||Communications system using bets|
|US6450887||Oct 1, 1999||Sep 17, 2002||Racetech L.L.C.||Methods and apparatus for parimutuel historical gaming|
|US6470324||Feb 19, 1999||Oct 22, 2002||Daimlerchrysler Corporation||Dealer inventory management system|
|US6505174||Nov 2, 1998||Jan 7, 2003||Hsx, Inc.||Computer-implemented securities trading system with a virtual specialist function|
|US6527270||Feb 13, 2001||Mar 4, 2003||Casino Advisory Services, Inc.||Method of effecting multiple wagers on a sports or other event|
|US6578010||Jun 5, 1995||Jun 10, 2003||George A. Teacherson||Multi-node network marketing computer system|
|US6598028||Nov 1, 1999||Jul 22, 2003||Lynn Sullivan||Computer-implemented universal financial management/translation system and method|
|US6669565||Feb 5, 2001||Dec 30, 2003||Fantasy Sports, Inc.||Method of conducting a fantasy sports game|
|US6688978||Mar 12, 2001||Feb 10, 2004||Bob Herman||Event contest method|
|US6711550||Mar 31, 2000||Mar 23, 2004||Ford Motor Company||Method and system for capacity planning|
|US6837791||Oct 13, 2000||Jan 4, 2005||Ods Properties, Inc.||Interactive wagering system with totalisator selection|
|US6910965||Apr 19, 2002||Jun 28, 2005||David W. Downes||Pari-mutuel sports wagering system|
|US6925446||Feb 22, 2001||Aug 2, 2005||International Business Machines Corporation||Purchase price, auction server, product retailing method, product purchasing method, program storage device, and program transmission apparatus therefor|
|US6939137||Dec 12, 2001||Sep 6, 2005||Cantor Fitzgerald, Lp||Method and system for training traders|
|US7001279||Aug 30, 2002||Feb 21, 2006||Interactive Sports Holdings, Inc.||Systems and methods for providing multiple user support for shared user equipment in a fantasy sports contest application|
|US7003485 *||May 5, 2000||Feb 21, 2006||Dale Young||Ticket auction|
|US7006991||Nov 21, 2002||Feb 28, 2006||Cfph, Llc||Computer-implemented securities trading system with a virtual specialist function|
|US7031938||Nov 26, 2003||Apr 18, 2006||James Fraivillig||Funds having investment results related to occurrence of external events to investor-selected investment options|
|US7076459||Mar 21, 2001||Jul 11, 2006||Hewlett-Packard Development Company, Lp.||Demand estimation using auction price analysis|
|US7099839||Sep 8, 1999||Aug 29, 2006||Primex Holdings, Llc||Opening price process for trading system|
|US7110961||Nov 27, 2000||Sep 19, 2006||Tadashi Goino||Method of selling right associated with games|
|US7146334||Dec 8, 2000||Dec 5, 2006||Xerox Corporation||System and method of determining latent demand for at least one of a plurality of commodities|
|US7152041||Mar 10, 2003||Dec 19, 2006||Chicago Mercantile Exchange, Inc.||Derivatives trading methods that use a variable order price|
|US7162447||Feb 2, 2000||Jan 9, 2007||Itg Software Solutions, Inc.||Method and system for obtaining a discovered price|
|US7171386||Oct 8, 1999||Jan 30, 2007||Rfv Holdings||Real-time commodity trading method and apparatus|
|US7172508||Jan 23, 2001||Feb 6, 2007||Burton Simon||Multi-person parimutuel betting games based on sporting events|
|US7487123||Aug 25, 1999||Feb 3, 2009||Cfph, Llc||Computer-implemented securities trading system with virtual currency and virtual specialist|
|US7567935 *||Sep 13, 2002||Jul 28, 2009||Morgan Stanley||Short trade information system|
|US20010003099||Jun 1, 1998||Jun 7, 2001||Henry Von Kohorn||Evaluation of responses of participatory broadcast audience with prediction of winning contestants; monitoring, checking and controlling of wagering, and automatic crediting and couponing|
|US20010039209||Apr 4, 2001||Nov 8, 2001||Ods Properties, Inc.||Interactive wagering systems and methods with multiple television feeds|
|US20010042785||May 8, 2001||Nov 22, 2001||Walker Jay S.||Method and apparatus for funds and credit line transfers|
|US20010047291 *||Apr 2, 2001||Nov 29, 2001||Masood Garahi||Systems and methods for placing parimutuel wagers on future events|
|US20020019792||Mar 22, 2001||Feb 14, 2002||Robert Maerz||Method and system for offering television pilots as a security|
|US20020023037 *||Nov 5, 2001||Feb 21, 2002||White Newton B.||Exchange method and apparatus|
|US20020156715 *||Apr 19, 2001||Oct 24, 2002||Cameron Wall||Apparatus and method for auctioning and reissuing a ticket online|
|US20070010314 *||Sep 14, 2006||Jan 11, 2007||Tulley Stephen C||Systems and methods wherein a lottery number combination is associated with a limited number of occurrences|
|1||*||"Atlantic International Entertainment, Ltd. (AIEE) Announces Third License Agreement for Internet Casino Extension (ICE) Product With Imperiamedia, Ltd."; PR Newswire; Friday, Jun. 18, 1999; pp. 1 and 2.|
|2||Alix Nyberg Stuart; CFO.com; Market Magic, Internal markets can solve thorny allocation problems and predict the future; 3 pages, Nov. 1, 2005.|
|3||American Film Market; Hollwoodnet.com; 1997, http://www.hollywoodnet.com/conferences/aft97.htm.|
|4||Astral Media, "The Harold Greenberg Fund's Equity Investment Program", 11 pages, dated 1992.|
|5||Avary's Domain-Interviews-Miltimeter Magazine Interview, pp. 9-10, dated Mar. 3, 1994.|
|6||Barbara Howard; The Trade; Institutional Investor; Technology Aims to Take the Final Step; pp. 15-16, Jan. 1991.|
|7||Barbara Kiviat; Time; The End of Management?; 5 pages, Jul. 6, 2004.|
|8||Bill Saporito; Time; Place Your Bets! On terrorism, on politics, on your future. Why markets will have a say in almost everything; 1 page, Oct. 24, 2005.|
|9||Business Week; The Power of Us, Mass Collaboration on the Internet is shaking up business; 6 pages, Jun. 20, 2005.|
|10||Business Week; The Power of Us, Mass Collaboration on the Internet is shaking up business; 6 pp., dated Jun. 20, 2005.|
|11||Cabral de Souza, Geraldo Marcelo, et al., Proceedings of the IASTED International Conference, Communications, Internet, & Information Technology, "A Gateway to Interconnect Corporate and Mobile Telephony Operator Networks for Two-way SMS Messages Interchange," pp. 449-453, dated Nov. 18, 2002.|
|12||CBS News; The Crowd Knows Best; 2 pages, Jan. 8, 2006.|
|13||Chang, Yahlin, "The Internet: Bull Market in Movies," Newsweek, 1 page, dated Feb. 3, 1997.|
|14||Charles Polk, et al.; The Policy Analysis Market: An Electronic Commerce Application of a Combinatorial Information Market; ACM 1-58113-679-X/03/0006, Jun. 9-12, 2003.|
|15||Charles R. Plott, et al.; Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences California Institute of Technology; Information Aggregation Mechanisms: Concept, Design and Implementation for a Sales Forecasting Problem; 34 pages, Mar. 2002.|
|16||Chris Hibbert; CommerceNet Labs Technical Report 05-02; Zocalo: An Open-Source Platform for Deploying Prediction Markets; 21 pages, Feb. 2005.|
|17||Christine DeMartini, et al.; A New and Improved Design for Multi-Object Iterative Auctions; 45 pages, Mar. 15, 1999.|
|18||Common Knowledge Markets; 7 pages, unknown.|
|19||Common Knowledge Markets; Swing State Presidential Prediction Markets; 2 pages, Oct. 6, 2004.|
|20||Cones, John W. and Wilke, Pete, "Investor Financing of Independent Film" pp. 1-257.|
|21||Cones, John W., "43 Ways to Finance Your Feature Film", A Comprehensive Analysis of Film Finance, 14 pages, dated 1995.|
|22||Corey Hajim; Fortune; Making a Market in (almost) anything; pp. 103-106, Aug. 8, 2005.|
|23||Digital Commerce on Increase, Publishing Technology Review, vol. 2, No. 2, ISSN: 1351-0177, 1 page, dated Jan. 1, 1995.|
|24||Domowitz, I. et al., "Auctions as algorithms: computerized trade execution and price discovery", Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, (J-Econ-Dyn-Control-Netherlands), Jan. 1994, vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 29-60.|
|25||Dubin, Alex, "Sunspot: Maryland's Online Community, Taking Stock at the Box Office," 5 pages, dated Aug. 19, 1997.|
|26||Emile Servan-Schreiber, et al.; Electronic Markets; Prediction Markets: Does Money Matter?; 11 pages, Sep. 2004.|
|27||Emile Servan-Schreiber; NewsFutures Prediction Markets; Presidential Reality Check; 6 pages, unknown.|
|28||Engineers, Hollywood Stock Exchange, 2 pages, dated Nov. 13, 1997.|
|29||Eric Benderoff; Chicago Tribune; Different Kind of Futures Market; 3 pages, Feb. 24, 2007.|
|30||Examination Report for European Patent Application No. 99965746.3, mailed Nov. 27, 2007, 7 pp.|
|31||Examiner Interview Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 11/279,997, mailed Jun. 22, 2009, 2 pp.|
|32||Feuer, Jack, "Disc Driven," Findarticles.com, 8 pages, dated Jul. 12, 1999.|
|33||Film Finances, Inc. The World Leader in Completion Guarantees, Internet print-out, 1 page, dated Nov. 23, 2005.|
|34||Film Finances, Inc., Sample Completion Guaranty; internet print-out, 14 pages.|
|35||Findarticles.com, "MediaX and CMC International Records Team Up for Exclusive Download Campaigns with Major Artists." PR Newswire, 2 pages, dated Dec. 8, 1999.|
|36||Friel, Dermot, et al., "An Automated Stock Price Delivery System Based on the GSM Short Message Service," IEEE, pp. 1591-1595 including Figure 3, dated 1998.|
|37||Hal R. Varian; The New York Times; Can markets be used to help people make nonmarket decisions?; 3 pages, May 8, 2003.|
|38||Hansell, Saul, "Today, Shoppers on Internet Get Access to Electronic Cash," The New York Times, Section D, p. 4, col. 5, 2 pages, dated Oct. 23, 1995.|
|39||Harvard Business School Working Knowledge; You Can Bet on Idea Markets; 4 pages, Dec. 1, 2003.|
|40||Howard Wolinsky; Sun-Times News Group; Prediction market rolls with hunches; 1 page, May 15, 2007.|
|41||In Science; The Real Power of Artificial Markets; pp. 987-988, Feb. 9, 2001.|
|42||Incentive Markets, Inc.; Incentive Market Prediction Games; 1 page, unknown.|
|43||Inside-Out Markets; Putting market forces to work inside your business; 4 pages, unknown.|
|44||Internet Printout: "What is UMOO", UMOO Financial Entertainment, http://www.umoo.com/about-umoo.aspx, downloaded Jul. 9, 2009, 3 pp.|
|45||Internet Printout: "Who We Are", Wall Street Survivor, http://www.wallstreetsurvivor.com/Public/Content/About.aspx, downloaded Jul. 9, 2009, 2 pp.|
|46||Jack D. Glen, "Trading and information systems in two emerging stock market", East Asian Executive Reports, Dec. 15, 1994, vol. 16., Iss 12, pp. 1-4, dated Dec. 15, 1994.|
|47||James M. Pethokoukis; Money & Business; All seeing all knowing; 5 pages, Aug. 22, 2004.|
|48||James Surowiecki Wired; Smarter Than the CEO; Issue 12.06; 3 pages, Jun. 2004.|
|49||Jia Ye; An Investigation of Market Fragmentation and the Specialist's Quotation Strategy; 97 pages, Aug. 1995.|
|50||John O. Ledyard, et al.; Interfaces; The First Use of a Combined-Value Auction for Transportation Services; vol. 32, No. 5; pp. 4-12, Sep./Oct. 2002.|
|51||*||Jon Kiele; "Caveat emptor: Understanding the dynamics of the futures market"; Electrical World, vol. 210, No. 9; Sep. 1996; pp. 1-5.|
|52||Joyce E. Berg, et al.; Information Systems Frontiers; Prediction Markets as Decision Support Systems; pp. 79-93, 2003.|
|53||Justin Wolfers, et al.; Journal of Economic Perspectives; Prediction Markets; vol. 18, No. 2; pp. 107-126, 2004.|
|54||K. C. Chan, et al.; The Journal of Business; Market Structure and the Intraday Pattern of Bid-Ask Spreads for NASDAQ Securities; vol. 68, No. 1; pp. 35-60, Jan. 1995.|
|55||Kaufman, Debra, "Lights, Camera, Capital, Online Investing," Wired Magazine, 2 pages, dated 2001.|
|56||Kelly, Brendan, Variety: Canadians turn to co-finance, pre-sales for TV prod'n coin. Findarticles.com , 4 pages, dated Jan. 19, 1998.|
|57||Ken Miguel; ABC7/KGO-TV/DT; Wisdom of Crowds: ABC7 Futures Market; 2 pages, unknown.|
|58||Kilmartin, Liam, et al., Development of an Interactive Voice Response System for a GSM SMS based Share Price Server, DSP UK-Sandown Exhibition Centre, pp. 89-93, dated Dec. 31, 1997.|
|59||Klapwald, Thea, "Prod'n co. born from Net game", Special Issue: The Independents; Daily Variety, Jul. 24, 1997, 2pp.|
|60||Lewis, Peter H., "Attention Internet Shoppers: E-Cash is Here," The New York Times, Section D, p. 4, col. 4,2 pages, dated Oct. 19, 1994.|
|61||Motoko Rich; The New York Times; Publisher to Let the Public Have a Vote on Book Projects; 3 pages, May 21, 2007.|
|62||Nash, Kim S., "Cybercash at Risk: Money Laws Lacking," Computerworld, 3 pages, dated Dec. 23, 1996.|
|63||Nelson, Darin, et al., (Design Issues in Multimedia Messaging for Next Generation Wireless Systems, pp. 98-103, dated 2001.|
|64||Net Exchange Addresses Dash Optimization User Group; Net Exchange disuses the application of optimization software to the commerce function of deal-making; 2 pages, Nov. 7, 2001.|
|65||Net Exchange Architects of Markets; Market Architecture: Improving Markets by Enhancing Choice; 9 pages, May 2001.|
|66||Net Exchange Deploys in the Transportation Procurement Market; Net Exchange's advanced combined value trading framework selected for Schneider Logistics' SUMIT CVA procurement system; 2 pages, Jul. 8, 2002.|
|67||Net Exchange Expanding the Value of Commerce; The Policy Analysis Market: "Market in Death" Or Your Next Decision Support Tool?; 15 pages, Sep. 9, 2003.|
|68||Net Exchange Expanding The Value Of Commerce; White Papers; 4 pages, unknown.|
|69||Net Exchange Presents at Energy Venture Fair; Net Exchange presents innovative solutions that address challenges faced by the energy industry; 1 page, Jun. 26, 2001.|
|70||Net Exchange Speaks at Eye for Energy Conference in Amsterdam; Net Exchange provides insight into evolution of energy trading; 2 pages, Mar. 28, 2001.|
|71||Newman, Jeffrey L., Amex.com, The Street.com, Across the Street: Buying Stock in Hollywood, 2 pages, dated Nov. 17, 1997.|
|72||News Futures Prediction Markets; Trading uncertainty for collective wisdom, 2 pp., dated Dec. 6, 2001.|
|73||News Futures Prediction Markets; Trading uncertainty for collective wisdom; 2 pages, Dec. 6, 2001.|
|74||NewsFutures Prediction Markets; Trading uncertainty for collective wisdom; 3 pages, Mar. 15, 2005.|
|75||NewsFutures Prediction Markets; Trading uncertainty for collective wisdom; 4 pages, unknown.|
|76||NewsFutures; About the Company, NewsFutures in the News; 2 pages, unknown.|
|77||Nils H. Hakansson, et al.; The Journal of Finance; On the Feasibility of Automated Market Making by a Programmed Specialist; vol. XL, No. 1; pp. 1-20, Mar. 1985.|
|78||Notification of the International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US99/25793, mailed Aug. 25, 2000, 2 pp.|
|79||Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US07/09389; 8 pages, Nov. 13, 2007.|
|80||Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration for International Application No. PCT/US04/11206; 9 pages, Jun. 5, 2007.|
|81||Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration for International Application No. PCT/US06/28805, mailed Dec. 27, 2006, 6 pp.|
|82||Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/279,997, mailed Jan. 14, 2009, 15 pp.|
|83||Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/379,171, mailed Jan. 29, 2009, 14 pp.|
|84||Pedersen-Pietersen, Laura, "The Hollywood Stock Market: You Can't Lose," The New York Times, Section 3, p. 4, col. 1, 3 pages, dated Jan. 11, 1998.|
|85||Prediction Markets Blog by Consensus Point; Foresight Technologies Changes Name to 'Consensus Point'; 3 pages, Jan. 30, 2006.|
|86||Prediction Markets Blog by Consensus Point; Popular Prediction Market Software Becomes Open Source; 3 pages, Aug. 29, 2005.|
|87||Prediction Mrkt Conference Presentation; 4 pages, Feb. 6, 2006.|
|88||Preliminary Examination Report for International Application No. PCT/US99/25793, dated May 17, 2001, 4 pp.|
|89||Ragas, Matthew, OnlinePress.com, Insider Trading-Hollywood Style, 3 pages, dated Feb. 4, 1998.|
|90||Richard R. Lindsey, et al.; Financial Analysts Journal; Specialist vs. Saitori: Market-Making in New York and Tokyo; 48, 4; ABI/INFORM Global; pp. 48-57, Jul./Aug. 1992.|
|91||Robert Bloomfield; The Accounting Review; The Interdependence of Reporting Discretion and Informational Efficiency in Laboratory Markets; vol. 71, No. 4; pp. 493-511, Oct. 1996.|
|92||Robin D. Hanson; IEEE Intelligent Systems; Trends & Controversies; Decision Markets; pp. 16-20, May/Jun. 1999.|
|93||Robin Hanson, et al.; Manipulators Increase Information Market Accuracy; pp. 1-11, Feb. 2007.|
|94||Schrage, Michael, (Firms Quietly Forming Own Economies, San Jose Mercury News, 2 Pages, dated Jul. 13, 2002.|
|95||Smith, Leo, Ventura County Business; Venture County Review; Ventura Studio Company Expands on Its Multimedia Savvy; The Los Angeles Times, 2 pages, dated Dec. 15, 1998.|
|96||The Cambridge-MIT Institute; Projects, Innovation Futures UK; 3 pages, unknown.|
|97||The Rogue Market Journal, "The Power Play on Popular Culture, A Letter from the Editor", 18 pages, dated Dec. 30, 1996.|
|98||Trendio; The founder of Trendio blogs to keep you informed of the latest developments on Trendio, to discuss the future of the site with you and to share some personal reflections; 2 pages, Oct. 17, 2006.|
|99||Tuchlin, Harris E., "Smooth Negotiating: Making the Director Deal," International Entertainment, Multimedia & Intellectual Property Law & Business Network, 13 pages.|
|100||UsableMarkets-markets, design, usability, research; Public Prediction Markets Heuristic Review: CrowdIQ; 9 pages, May 9, 2006.|
|101||William C. Freund; California Management Review; Trading Stock Around the Clock: The Future Growth of Global Electronic Markets; 34, 1; ABI/INFORM Global; pp. 87-102, 1991.|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US7896740||Nov 9, 2009||Mar 1, 2011||Cantor Index, Llc||Exchange of entries corresponding to participants in a sports competition|
|US8292725||Jul 22, 2010||Oct 23, 2012||Football Nation Holdings, Llc||Fantasy sports game and method of conducting same|
|US8342942||Sep 28, 2006||Jan 1, 2013||Cantor Index, Llc||System and method for creating betting instruments|
|US8473393||Nov 16, 2010||Jun 25, 2013||Cantor Index, Llc||Financial market wagering|
|US8535138||Mar 30, 2012||Sep 17, 2013||Cantor Index, Llc||Computer graphics processing and system for displaying wagering information for dynamic financial market indicators|
|US8543487||Feb 7, 2011||Sep 24, 2013||Cantor Index, Llc||System and method for wagering-based transferable financial instruments|
|US8585490||Sep 14, 2012||Nov 19, 2013||Cantor Index, Llc||Computer graphics processing methods and systems for presentation of graphic objects|
|US8805732||May 3, 2011||Aug 12, 2014||Cantor Index, Llc||System and method for offering intraday wagering in a financial market environment|
|US20040193469 *||Sep 22, 2003||Sep 30, 2004||Cantor Index Llc||System and method for spread betting on a participant in a group of events|
|US20040193531 *||Sep 22, 2003||Sep 30, 2004||Cantor Index Llc||System and method for betting on a participant in a group of events|
|US20110065494 *||Mar 17, 2011||Nicholas Kennedy||Sports wagering exchange and method therefor|
|US20110173133 *||Jan 11, 2010||Jul 14, 2011||Augustine Adebayo Ojo||Securities data analysis and prediction tool|
|U.S. Classification||463/26, 463/29, 463/20, 463/25, 463/23|
|International Classification||G06F, G06Q30/00, G06F17/00, G06F19/00, A63F9/24, A63F13/00|
|Cooperative Classification||G06Q30/0611, G06Q20/1085, G06Q40/04, G06Q30/0601, G06Q30/08, G06F17/608, A63F2300/8052, G07F17/3288|
|European Classification||G06Q40/04, G06Q30/08, G06Q20/1085, G06Q30/0601, G06Q30/0611|
|Jul 26, 2004||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: CANTOR INDEX LLC, NEW YORK
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:ASHER, JOSEPH M.;CROSTHWAITE, DOMINIC;LUTNICK, HOWARD W.;REEL/FRAME:015638/0256;SIGNING DATES FROM 20040707 TO 20040723
|Jul 5, 2013||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4