|Publication number||US7676517 B2|
|Application number||US 11/250,744|
|Publication date||Mar 9, 2010|
|Priority date||Oct 14, 2005|
|Also published as||CA2625097A1, CA2625097C, CN101283356A, CN101283356B, EP1938224A1, EP1938224A4, US20070088686, WO2007047171A1|
|Publication number||11250744, 250744, US 7676517 B2, US 7676517B2, US-B2-7676517, US7676517 B2, US7676517B2|
|Inventors||Oliver Hurst-Hiller, Srinivasa V. Thirumalai-Anandanpillai, Neel I. Murarka, Marek L. Gorecki|
|Original Assignee||Microsoft Corporation|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (25), Non-Patent Citations (9), Referenced by (40), Classifications (9), Legal Events (3)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
With the advent of the Internet, enormous amounts of information have been made accessible via the network to users of all skill levels and backgrounds. This also applies to technological advances in hardware storage systems that facilitate storing large amounts of data (e.g., gigabytes and terabytes) on a user's home computer. Users, both home and professional, are now prone to store anything and everything since the cost to do so is becoming cheaper. However, searching through these large amounts of data then becomes problematic.
Many text input and search result interfaces have benefited from so-called “word-wheel” interfaces, also known as look-ahead, auto-complete, etc., whereby query suggestions or search results are displayed and adjust in response to each user keystroke. The user is given immediate feedback on the likely success of the formulation of their input; they can enter input more quickly, and even complete their task without even hitting Enter.
There are many popular commercial word-wheel examples. Always-on Internet connections, broadband connections, and protocols have enabled amazing interaction responsiveness in which keystrokes and results are exchanged over the wire in a seamless user experience.
However, to date, these systems are limited in scope by the data systems they access when attempting to provide their suggestions, completions, etc. For example, client-based systems such a browser address box and webpage desk bars only supply results from local lists and indices, while Internet-based systems only supply results from Internet-based lists and indices.
The following presents a simplified summary in order to provide a basic understanding of some aspects of the disclosed innovation. This summary is not an extensive overview, and it is not intended to identify key/critical elements or to delineate the scope thereof. Its sole purpose is to present some concepts in a simplified form as a prelude to the more detailed description that is presented later.
The subject innovation transcends the division offered by conventional architectures by providing a query input box in a client application which provides richer look-ahead query results by integrating results from a network-based service (e.g., Internet-based services) with results from the client application. In other words, realtime network-based search results are injected into the query as the user types the query into a client input box. When a user enters a query character into a query input box of a client application, a search is conducted via an Internet-based index service using the existing query character. In response, the search returns suggested results that are then processed to complete the query as presented for selection by the user in the query input box.
Accordingly, the invention disclosed and claimed herein, in one aspect thereof, comprises a system that facilitates query processing. The system includes a query component that facilitates input of a portion of query data into a client application, and a search component that accesses a network-based service to suggest additional query data in response to receiving the portion of the query data and communicates the additional query data to the query component for presentation to a user.
In another aspect of the subject invention, personalized customization of the query is provided by accessing user-related data that narrows the injected query data according to user-related information.
In yet another aspect thereof, personalization of the results is provided by narrowing the search results according to user interactions and user information.
In yet another aspect thereof, a machine learning and reasoning component is provided that employs a probabilistic and/or statistical-based analysis to prognose or infer an action that a user desires to be automatically performed.
To the accomplishment of the foregoing and related ends, certain illustrative aspects of the disclosed innovation are described herein in connection with the following description and the annexed drawings. These aspects are indicative, however, of but a few of the various ways in which the principles disclosed herein can be employed and is intended to include all such aspects and their equivalents. Other advantages and novel features will become apparent from the following detailed description when considered in conjunction with the drawings.
The innovation is now described with reference to the drawings, wherein like reference numerals are used to refer to like elements throughout. In the following description, for purposes of explanation, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding thereof. It may be evident, however, that the innovation can be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well-known structures and devices are shown in block diagram form in order to facilitate a description thereof.
As used in this application, the terms “component” and “system” are intended to refer to a computer-related entity, either hardware, a combination of hardware and software, software, or software in execution. For example, a component can be, but is not limited to being, a process running on a processor, a processor, a hard disk drive, multiple storage drives (of optical and/or magnetic storage medium), an object, an executable, a thread of execution, a program, and/or a computer. By way of illustration, both an application running on a server and the server can be a component. One or more components can reside within a process and/or thread of execution, and a component can be localized on one computer and/or distributed between two or more computers.
As used herein, terms “to infer” and “inference” refer generally to the process of reasoning about or inferring states of the system, environment, and/or user from a set of observations as captured via events and/or data. Inference can be employed to identify a specific context or action, or can generate a probability distribution over states, for example. The inference can be probabilistic-that is, the computation of a probability distribution over states of interest based on a consideration of data and events. Inference can also refer to techniques employed for composing higher-level events from a set of events and/or data. Such inference results in the construction of new events or actions from a set of observed events and/or stored event data, whether or not the events are correlated in close temporal proximity, and whether the events and data come from one or several event and data sources.
While certain ways of displaying information to users are shown and described with respect to certain figures as screenshots, those skilled in the relevant art will recognize that various other alternatives can be employed. The terms “screen,” “web page,” and “page” are generally used interchangeably herein. The pages or screens are stored and/or transmitted as display descriptions, as graphical user interfaces, or by other methods of depicting information on a screen (whether personal computer, PDA, mobile telephone, or other suitable device, for example) where the layout and information or content to be displayed on the page is stored in memory, database, or another storage facility.
Referring initially to the drawings,
Accordingly, the system 100 includes a query component 102 that facilitates input of a portion of query data into a client application, and a search component 104 that accesses a network-based service to suggest additional query data in response to receiving the portion of the query data and communicates the additional query data to the query component 102 for presentation to a user.
At 200, a client application is received for execution. At 202, a user enters a query character into a query input box of the client application. At 204, the character is processed in realtime against an indexed network-based (e.g., Internet based service) search service. At 206, search results are returned from the network-based service, based on the character entered. At 208, a suggested list of search results is presented to complete the query in the query input box. At 210, the system determines if the user has selected one of the suggested queries. If so, the search results are presented and the query process stops. Alternatively, if the user has not selected one of the suggested queries, flow is from 210 to 212 to receive the next query character as entered by the user in the query input box. Flow is then back to 204 to process the existing combination of characters against the network-based index service and provide a new suggested list of search results in the query input box.
Referring now to
The trigger component 402 facilitates the inclusion of other data to affect the query process. For example, personalization information such as user profile information can be processed to refine or narrow the search results. The user profile information can include preferences about which sites to not visit, which sites should always be visited first, and so on. Other personalization information can include historical data tracked and stored from previous searches (e.g., in a Favorites file, History files . . . ). Thus, this personalized trigger information can be accessed locally from other applications of the user machine or device to impact how the query will be processed for look-ahead realtime presentation.
The trigger component 402 can also facilitate impacting, refining or filtering the search results as they are being returned to the user. Thus, a personalization of search results can be achieved by considering, again, user preferences information, frequently accessed websites (e.g., a history file), and/or a preferred set of websites (e.g., a favorites file), for example. In one example, if the user begins entering characters “h-o-t”, the most common site might be Hotmail, but based on the user browsing history, the application would actually know that Hot Jobs is the website the user wants to access. Other personalization information can include the time of day that the user typically would access a given website. For example, if the user typically accesses MSN.com in the morning between 8-9 AM, this information can be used to refine the query and the search results.
The ranking component 404 facilitates ranking the results. Ranking criteria can, again, be based on personalized information such as preferred websites, preferred query terms (as learned form past query entries), and so on.
The rules component 406 can store and process any number of rules that can be created by the user and/or can be passed down from the Internet service. The user-defined rules can be created via the client application through which the query is being made or any other associated client application on the client machine, for example. One example of a rule is to “only consider query options X and Y during a given time span of any day”. Another rule can be to “execute rules A and B when detecting input string h-o-t in the query input box”. It is to be understood that these are only but a few examples of the many rules that can be user-defined for query processing in accordance with the subject innovation.
The client application 400 can also include an optional machine learning and reasoning (LR) component 408 which facilitates automating one or more features in accordance with the subject innovation. The subject invention (e.g., in connection with selection) can employ various LR-based schemes for carrying out various aspects thereof. For example, a process for determining what rules to impose can be facilitated via an automatic classifier system and process.
A classifier is a function that maps an input attribute vector, x=(x1, x2, x3, x4, xn), to a class label class(x). The classifier can also output a confidence that the input belongs to a class, that is, f(x)=confidence(class(x)). Such classification can employ a probabilistic and/or statistical-based analysis (e.g., factoring into the analysis utilities and costs) to prognose or infer an action that a user desires to be automatically performed.
A support vector machine (SVM) is an example of a classifier that can be employed. The SVM operates by finding a hypersurface in the space of possible inputs that splits the triggering input events from the non-triggering events in an optimal way. Intuitively, this makes the classification correct for testing data that is near, but not identical to training data. Other directed and undirected model classification approaches include, e.g., na´ve Bayes, Bayesian networks, decision trees, neural networks, fuzzy logic models, and probabilistic classification models providing different patterns of independence can be employed. Classification as used herein also is inclusive of statistical regression that is utilized to develop models of priority.
As will be readily appreciated from the subject specification, the subject invention can employ classifiers that are explicitly trained (e.g., via a generic training data) as well as implicitly trained (e.g., via observing user behavior, receiving extrinsic information). For example, SVM's are configured via a learning or training phase within a classifier constructor and feature selection module. Thus, the classifier(s) can be employed to automatically learn and perform a number of functions, including but not limited to determining according to a predetermined criteria, the following example implementations.
The LR component 408 can learn user interactive aspects and automate later interactions based on the previously learned aspects. For example, if the user is a power user as learned by prior user interactions, the LR component 408 can determine this and further automate the user experience by moving quickly between query presentations and jumping directly to look-ahead operations and results processing. Alternatively, if by way of user interaction the LR component 408 determines that the user is more of a novice user, automations can be limited to allow the user to more slowly perceive aspects of the query completion process and search results. However, as the user becomes more skilled during the query process, the LR component 408 will learn this and automate more features or aspects of the query completion process and search results.
In another implementation, the LR component 408 automatically generates rules that can be executed based on user interaction. For example, as the user regularly interacts with a particular website, the LR component 408 can create a rule that limits other website results as the look-ahead query operation is being processed. Thus, user interactions over time can be automatically memorialized as a rule and stored in the rule component 406 for activation at any time. Another example, is if the user routinely mistypes words, these mistypes words will eventually be resolved by user correction, application spell checking, and so on. The LR component 408 can learn these regularly mistyped words, associate them with the correct spellings, and utilize them in the look-ahead query input and search results processing. This precludes the user from having to manually insert the routinely mistyped word in the application dictionary, which thereafter will automatically correct the mistyped word upon entry.
In yet another implementation, the LR component 408 learns and associates user interactions with specific client applications. For example, if the user typically enters a query while in a spreadsheet application, and which query results in accessing a particular website, this association can be learned and stored in association with the spreadsheet application, but not another client application. However, it can be learned that the interaction information can apply to more than one client application.
In still another example, the LR component 408 can learn to increase or decrease the number of characters automatically input into the query input box in the realtime look-ahead format based on user interaction and learning if the user is more of a power user versus a novice user. The learning can be based on how fast the user types, non-use of the suggested characters and/or search results when ultimately they do use a suggested result, the number of spelling mistakes, and so on.
It is to be understood that these are only but a few examples of the power that the LR component 408 can provide in enhancing the user experience of the subject innovation. For example, the LR component 408 can also be employed in ranking the search results based on learned user interaction and query inputs. In one implementation, the user can manually adjust a slide bar (or some other user control input) to increase automations of processes or decrease them. For example, the user can manually configure the system to perform a search only after three characters have been entered, instead for each character. In a more robust implementation, the number user input characters used for a search can increase or decrease dynamically based on user interaction, and the type of information being searched. For example, where a URL (uniform resource locator) is being entered, there may be no need to search on a character-by-character basis, but to dynamically increase by 2-3 characters at a time and then back down to a single character at a time later in the entry process.
Referring now to
At 806, the query is completed based on the currently received characters. For example, if the user begins to enter the characters b-a-s-e, the system completes the query by automatically entering for the user b-a-l-l as a suggestion. A number of other suggestions can be ranked and provided, such as for example, m-e-n-t for basement, s-t-a-t-i-o-n for base station, and so on.
Referring now to
Generally, program modules include routines, programs, components, data structures, etc., that perform particular tasks or implement particular abstract data types. Moreover, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the inventive methods can be practiced with other computer system configurations, including single-processor or multiprocessor computer systems, minicomputers, mainframe computers, as well as personal computers, hand-held computing devices, microprocessor-based or programmable consumer electronics, and the like, each of which can be operatively coupled to one or more associated devices.
The illustrated aspects of the innovation may also be practiced in distributed computing environments where certain tasks are performed by remote processing devices that are linked through a communications network. In a distributed computing environment, program modules can be located in both local and remote memory storage devices.
A computer typically includes a variety of computer-readable media. Computer-readable media can be any available media that can be accessed by the computer and includes both volatile and non-volatile media, removable and non-removable media. By way of example, and not limitation, computer-readable media can comprise computer storage media and communication media. Computer storage media includes both volatile and non-volatile, removable and non-removable media implemented in any method or technology for storage of information such as computer-readable instructions, data structures, program modules or other data. Computer storage media includes, but is not limited to, RAM, ROM, EEPROM, flash memory or other memory technology, CD-ROM, digital video disk (DVD) or other optical disk storage, magnetic cassettes, magnetic tape, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other medium which can be used to store the desired information and which can be accessed by the computer.
Communication media typically embodies computer-readable instructions, data structures, program modules or other data in a modulated data signal such as a carrier wave or other transport mechanism, and includes any information delivery media. The term “modulated data signal” means a signal that has one or more of its characteristics set or changed in such a manner as to encode information in the signal. By way of example, and not limitation, communication media includes wired media such as a wired network or direct-wired connection, and wireless media such as acoustic, RF, infrared and other wireless media. Combinations of the any of the above should also be included within the scope of computer-readable media.
With reference again to
The system bus 2208 can be any of several types of bus structure that may further interconnect to a memory bus (with or without a memory controller), a peripheral bus, and a local bus using any of a variety of commercially available bus architectures. The system memory 2206 includes read-only memory (ROM) 2210 and random access memory (RAM) 2212. A basic input/output system (BIOS) is stored in a non-volatile memory 2210 such as ROM, EPROM, EEPROM, which BIOS contains the basic routines that help to transfer information between elements within the computer 2202, such as during start-up. The RAM 2212 can also include a high-speed RAM such as static RAM for caching data.
The computer 2202 further includes an internal hard disk drive (HDD) 2214 (e.g., EIDE, SATA), which internal hard disk drive 2214 may also be configured for external use in a suitable chassis (not shown), a magnetic floppy disk drive (FDD) 2216, (e.g., to read from or write to a removable diskette 2218) and an optical disk drive 2220, (e.g., reading a CD-ROM disk 2222 or, to read from or write to other high capacity optical media such as the DVD). The hard disk drive 2214, magnetic disk drive 2216 and optical disk drive 2220 can be connected to the system bus 2208 by a hard disk drive interface 2224, a magnetic disk drive interface 2226 and an optical drive interface 2228, respectively. The interface 2224 for external drive implementations includes at least one or both of Universal Serial Bus (USB) and IEEE 1394 interface technologies. Other external drive connection technologies are within contemplation of the subject innovation.
The drives and their associated computer-readable media provide nonvolatile storage of data, data structures, computer-executable instructions, and so forth. For the computer 2202, the drives and media accommodate the storage of any data in a suitable digital format. Although the description of computer-readable media above refers to a HDD, a removable magnetic diskette, and a removable optical media such as a CD or DVD, it should be appreciated by those skilled in the art that other types of media which are readable by a computer, such as zip drives, magnetic cassettes, flash memory cards, cartridges, and the like, may also be used in the exemplary operating environment, and further, that any such media may contain computer-executable instructions for performing the methods of the disclosed innovation.
A number of program modules can be stored in the drives and RAM 2212, including an operating system 2230, one or more application programs 2232, other program modules 2234 and program data 2236. All or portions of the operating system, applications, modules, and/or data can also be cached in the RAM 2212. It is to be appreciated that the innovation can be implemented with various commercially available operating systems or combinations of operating systems.
A user can enter commands and information into the computer 2202 through one or more wired/wireless input devices, e.g., a keyboard 2238 and a pointing device, such as a mouse 2240. Other input devices (not shown) may include a microphone, an IR remote control, a joystick, a game pad, a stylus pen, touch screen, or the like. These and other input devices are often connected to the processing unit 2204 through an input device interface 2242 that is coupled to the system bus 2208, but can be connected by other interfaces, such as a parallel port, an IEEE 1394 serial port, a game port, a USB port, an IR interface, etc.
A monitor 2244 or other type of display device is also connected to the system bus 2208 via an interface, such as a video adapter 2246. In addition to the monitor 2244, a computer typically includes other peripheral output devices (not shown), such as speakers, printers, etc.
The computer 2202 may operate in a networked environment using logical connections via wired and/or wireless communications to one or more remote computers, such as a remote computer(s) 2248. The remote computer(s) 2248 can be a workstation, a server computer, a router, a personal computer, portable computer, microprocessor-based entertainment appliance, a peer device or other common network node, and typically includes many or all of the elements described relative to the computer 2202, although, for purposes of brevity, only a memory/storage device 2250 is illustrated. The logical connections depicted include wired/wireless connectivity to a local area network (LAN) 2252 and/or larger networks, e.g., a wide area network (WAN) 2254. Such LAN and WAN networking environments are commonplace in offices and companies, and facilitate enterprise-wide computer networks, such as intranets, all of which may connect to a global communications network, e.g., the Internet.
When used in a LAN networking environment, the computer 2202 is connected to the local network 2252 through a wired and/or wireless communication network interface or adapter 2256. The adaptor 2256 may facilitate wired or wireless communication to the LAN 2252, which may also include a wireless access point disposed thereon for communicating with the wireless adaptor 2256.
When used in a WAN networking environment, the computer 2202 can include a modem 2258, or is connected to a communications server on the WAN 2254, or has other means for establishing communications over the WAN 2254, such as by way of the Internet. The modem 2258, which can be internal or external and a wired or wireless device, is connected to the system bus 2208 via the serial port interface 2242. In a networked environment, program modules depicted relative to the computer 2202, or portions thereof, can be stored in the remote memory/storage device 2250. It will be appreciated that the network connections shown are exemplary and other means of establishing a communications link between the computers can be used.
The computer 2202 is operable to communicate with any wireless devices or entities operatively disposed in wireless communication, e.g., a printer, scanner, desktop and/or portable computer, portable data assistant, communications satellite, any piece of equipment or location associated with a wirelessly detectable tag (e.g., a kiosk, news stand, restroom), and telephone. This includes at least Wi-Fi and Bluetooth™ wireless technologies. Thus, the communication can be a predefined structure as with a conventional network or simply an ad hoc communication between at least two devices.
Wi-Fi, or Wireless Fidelity, allows connection to the Internet from a couch at home, a bed in a hotel room, or a conference room at work, without wires. Wi-Fi is a wireless technology similar to that used in a cell phone that enables such devices, e.g., computers, to send and receive data indoors and out; anywhere within the range of a base station. Wi-Fi networks use radio technologies called IEEE 802.11 (a, b, g, etc.) to provide secure, reliable, fast wireless connectivity. A Wi-Fi network can be used to connect computers to each other, to the Internet, and to wired networks (which use IEEE 802.3 or Ethernet). Wi-Fi networks operate in the unlicensed 2.4 and 5 GHz radio bands, at an 11 Mbps (802.11a) or 54 Mbps (802.11b) data rate, for example, or with products that contain both bands (dual band), so the networks can provide real-world performance similar to the basic 10BaseT wired Ethernet networks used in many offices.
Referring now to
The system 2300 also includes one or more server(s) 2304. The server(s) 2304 can also be hardware and/or software (e.g., threads, processes, computing devices). The servers 2304 can house threads to perform transformations by employing the invention, for example. One possible communication between a client 2302 and a server 2304 can be in the form of a data packet adapted to be transmitted between two or more computer processes. The data packet may include a cookie and/or associated contextual information, for example. The system 2300 includes a communication framework 2306 (e.g., a global communication network such as the Internet) that can be employed to facilitate communications between the client(s) 2302 and the server(s) 2304.
Communications can be facilitated via a wired (including optical fiber) and/or wireless technology. The client(s) 2302 are operatively connected to one or more client data store(s) 2308 that can be employed to store information local to the client(s) 2302 (e.g., cookie(s) and/or associated contextual information). Similarly, the server(s) 2304 are operatively connected to one or more server data store(s) 2310 that can be employed to store information local to the servers 2304.
What has been described above includes examples of the disclosed innovation. It is, of course, not possible to describe every conceivable combination of components and/or methodologies, but one of ordinary skill in the art may recognize that many further combinations and permutations are possible. Accordingly, the innovation is intended to embrace all such alterations, modifications and variations that fall within the spirit and scope of the appended claims. Furthermore, to the extent that the term “includes” is used in either the detailed description or the claims, such term is intended to be inclusive in a manner similar to the term “comprising” as “comprising” is interpreted when employed as a transitional word in a claim.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US4931935||Jul 1, 1988||Jun 5, 1990||Hitachi Ltd.||User interface system for permitting natural language interaction with an information retrieval system|
|US5845300||Jun 5, 1996||Dec 1, 1998||Microsoft Corporation||Method and apparatus for suggesting completions for a partially entered data item based on previously-entered, associated data items|
|US6144958||Jul 15, 1998||Nov 7, 2000||Amazon.Com, Inc.||System and method for correcting spelling errors in search queries|
|US6169986||Oct 1, 1999||Jan 2, 2001||Amazon.Com, Inc.||System and method for refining search queries|
|US6182091||Sep 29, 1999||Jan 30, 2001||Xerox Corporation||Method and apparatus for finding related documents in a collection of linked documents using a bibliographic coupling link analysis|
|US6308649 *||Jan 12, 2000||Oct 30, 2001||Steven A. Gedeon||Sailboat and crew performance optimization system|
|US6401084||Mar 2, 2000||Jun 4, 2002||Amazon.Com Holdings, Inc||System and method for correcting spelling errors in search queries using both matching and non-matching search terms|
|US6513036||Aug 13, 1999||Jan 28, 2003||Mindpass A/S||Method and apparatus for searching and presenting search result from one or more information sources based on context representations selected from the group of other users|
|US6522740 *||May 2, 2001||Feb 18, 2003||Ameritech Corporation||Method and system for selectively performing call information query|
|US6564213 *||Apr 18, 2000||May 13, 2003||Amazon.Com, Inc.||Search query autocompletion|
|US6654742||Feb 11, 2000||Nov 25, 2003||International Business Machines Corporation||Method and system for document collection final search result by arithmetical operations between search results sorted by multiple ranking metrics|
|US6678681||Mar 9, 2000||Jan 13, 2004||Google Inc.||Information extraction from a database|
|US6725259||Jan 27, 2003||Apr 20, 2004||Google Inc.||Ranking search results by reranking the results based on local inter-connectivity|
|US6745195 *||Sep 15, 2000||Jun 1, 2004||General Electric Company||System, method and computer program product for generating software cards that summarize and index information|
|US6766069||Dec 21, 1999||Jul 20, 2004||Xerox Corporation||Text selection from images of documents using auto-completion|
|US6772150||Mar 22, 2000||Aug 3, 2004||Amazon.Com, Inc.||Search query refinement using related search phrases|
|US6853993||Apr 1, 2002||Feb 8, 2005||A9.Com, Inc.||System and methods for predicting correct spellings of terms in multiple-term search queries|
|US6862586||Feb 11, 2000||Mar 1, 2005||International Business Machines Corporation||Searching databases that identifying group documents forming high-dimensional torus geometric k-means clustering, ranking, summarizing based on vector triplets|
|US6871202||May 6, 2003||Mar 22, 2005||Overture Services, Inc.||Method and apparatus for ranking web page search results|
|US20040010484 *||Jun 9, 2003||Jan 15, 2004||Foulger Michael G.||Interactive intelligent searching with executable suggestions|
|US20060129531 *||Dec 9, 2004||Jun 15, 2006||International Business Machines Corporation||Method and system for suggesting search engine keywords|
|US20070050339 *||May 8, 2006||Mar 1, 2007||Richard Kasperski||Biasing queries to determine suggested queries|
|US20070055652 *||Aug 24, 2005||Mar 8, 2007||Stephen Hood||Speculative search result for a search query|
|KR20010064751A||Title not available|
|KR20020003915A||Title not available|
|1||Answers.com; 1-Click Answers(TM) for Windows puts answers at your fingertips with three time-saving features. GuruNet, 1999-2005. http://www.answers.com/main/product-info.jsp. Last accessed Oct. 14, 2005. 2 pages.|
|2||Answers.com; 1-Click Answers™ for Windows puts answers at your fingertips with three time-saving features. GuruNet, 1999-2005. http://www.answers.com/main/product—info.jsp. Last accessed Oct. 14, 2005. 2 pages.|
|3||Google Suggest; What is Google Suggest? Google, 2004. http://labs.google.com//suggestfaq.html. Last accessed Oct. 14, 2005. 2 pages.|
|4||International Search Report dated Mar. 16, 2007 mailed Mar. 16, 2007 for PCT Application Serial No. PCT/US2006/039193, 3 Pages.|
|5||Mac OS X Tiger; Find stuff without even looking. Apple Computer, 2005. http://www.apple.com/macosx/overview. Last accessed Oct. 14, 2005. 4 pages.|
|6||MSN Search Toolbar. Microsoft Corporation, 2005. http://toolbar.msn.com//tour-suite/start.aspx. Last accessed Oct. 14, 2005. 1 page.|
|7||MSN Search Toolbar. Microsoft Corporation, 2005. http://toolbar.msn.com//tour—suite/start.aspx. Last accessed Oct. 14, 2005. 1 page.|
|8||Snap is a Better Way to Use the Web. Perfect Market Technologies, Inc., 2005. http://www.snap.com/about/about.php?last-link-type=about. Last accessed Oct. 14, 2005. 1 page.|
|9||Snap is a Better Way to Use the Web. Perfect Market Technologies, Inc., 2005. http://www.snap.com/about/about.php?last—link—type=about. Last accessed Oct. 14, 2005. 1 page.|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US7831595 *||Nov 9, 2010||Yahoo! Inc.||Predicting and ranking search query results|
|US8060639||Jul 2, 2010||Nov 15, 2011||Masterobjects, Inc.||System and method for utilizing asynchronous client server communication objects|
|US8082264 *||Dec 20, 2011||Inquira, Inc.||Automated scheme for identifying user intent in real-time|
|US8095476||Jan 10, 2012||Inquira, Inc.||Automated support scheme for electronic forms|
|US8296284||Oct 23, 2012||Oracle International Corp.||Guided navigation system|
|US8429184||Apr 23, 2013||Collarity Inc.||Generation of refinement terms for search queries|
|US8442972||Oct 11, 2007||May 14, 2013||Collarity, Inc.||Negative associations for search results ranking and refinement|
|US8478780||Apr 23, 2010||Jul 2, 2013||Oracle Otc Subsidiary Llc||Method and apparatus for identifying and classifying query intent|
|US8539024||Feb 6, 2012||Sep 17, 2013||Masterobjects, Inc.||System and method for asynchronous client server session communication|
|US8612208||Apr 7, 2004||Dec 17, 2013||Oracle Otc Subsidiary Llc||Ontology for use with a system, method, and computer readable medium for retrieving information and response to a query|
|US8639684 *||Aug 15, 2011||Jan 28, 2014||Google Inc.||Dynamic search box for web browser|
|US8781813||Aug 14, 2006||Jul 15, 2014||Oracle Otc Subsidiary Llc||Intent management tool for identifying concepts associated with a plurality of users' queries|
|US8812541||Mar 12, 2013||Aug 19, 2014||Collarity, Inc.||Generation of refinement terms for search queries|
|US8843469||Aug 4, 2011||Sep 23, 2014||International Business Machines Corporation||Faceted and selectable tabs within ephemeral search results|
|US8874690 *||May 24, 2013||Oct 28, 2014||Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktiengesellschaft||Motor vehicle having an internet connection and method of operating same|
|US8875038||Jan 19, 2011||Oct 28, 2014||Collarity, Inc.||Anchoring for content synchronization|
|US8898140||Jun 27, 2013||Nov 25, 2014||Oracle Otc Subsidiary Llc||Identifying and classifying query intent|
|US8924410||Nov 18, 2011||Dec 30, 2014||Oracle International Corporation||Automated scheme for identifying user intent in real-time|
|US8959109||Aug 6, 2012||Feb 17, 2015||Microsoft Corporation||Business intelligent in-document suggestions|
|US9262528||Jul 10, 2014||Feb 16, 2016||Oracle International Corporation||Intent management tool for identifying concepts associated with a plurality of users' queries|
|US9275106||Dec 18, 2013||Mar 1, 2016||Google Inc.||Dynamic search box for web browser|
|US9348479||Dec 8, 2011||May 24, 2016||Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc||Sentiment aware user interface customization|
|US9378290||Dec 20, 2011||Jun 28, 2016||Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc||Scenario-adaptive input method editor|
|US9431008 *||May 29, 2013||Aug 30, 2016||Nuance Communications, Inc.||Multiple parallel dialogs in smart phone applications|
|US20080104037 *||Dec 18, 2007||May 1, 2008||Inquira, Inc.||Automated scheme for identifying user intent in real-time|
|US20080140643 *||Oct 11, 2007||Jun 12, 2008||Collarity, Inc.||Negative associations for search results ranking and refinement|
|US20080215976 *||Nov 26, 2007||Sep 4, 2008||Inquira, Inc.||Automated support scheme for electronic forms|
|US20090089044 *||Aug 14, 2006||Apr 2, 2009||Inquira, Inc.||Intent management tool|
|US20090171942 *||Dec 31, 2007||Jul 2, 2009||Bipin Suresh||Predicting and ranking search query results|
|US20090204577 *||Feb 8, 2008||Aug 13, 2009||Sap Ag||Saved Search and Quick Search Control|
|US20100205180 *||Apr 23, 2010||Aug 12, 2010||Inquira, Inc.||Method and apparatus for identifying and classifying query intent|
|US20110106966 *||May 5, 2011||Masterobjects, Inc.||System and method for utilizing asynchronous client server communication objects|
|US20110131210 *||Jun 2, 2011||Inquira, Inc.||Guided navigation system|
|US20110184723 *||Jan 25, 2010||Jul 28, 2011||Microsoft Corporation||Phonetic suggestion engine|
|US20110202533 *||Feb 17, 2010||Aug 18, 2011||Ye-Yi Wang||Dynamic Search Interaction|
|US20110302188 *||Dec 8, 2011||Google Inc.||Dynamic search box for web browser|
|US20120297294 *||Nov 22, 2012||Microsoft Corporation||Network search for writing assistance|
|US20130254338 *||May 24, 2013||Sep 26, 2013||Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktiengesellschaft||Motor Vehicle Having an Internet Connection and Method of Operating Same|
|US20140358545 *||May 29, 2013||Dec 4, 2014||Nuance Communjications, Inc.||Multiple Parallel Dialogs in Smart Phone Applications|
|US20140359598 *||Aug 28, 2013||Dec 4, 2014||Microsoft Corporation||Application installation from search results|
|International Classification||G06F7/00, G06F17/30|
|Cooperative Classification||G06F17/30395, G06F17/30867, G06F17/30864|
|European Classification||G06F17/30W1, G06F17/30S4F3, G06F17/30W1F|
|Nov 4, 2005||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: MICROSOFT CORPORATION, WASHINGTON
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:HURST-HILLER, OLIVER;THIRUMALAI-ANANDANPILLAI, SRINIVASAV.;MURARKA, NEEL I.;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:016732/0774;SIGNING DATES FROM 20051010 TO 20051013
Owner name: MICROSOFT CORPORATION,WASHINGTON
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:HURST-HILLER, OLIVER;THIRUMALAI-ANANDANPILLAI, SRINIVASAV.;MURARKA, NEEL I.;AND OTHERS;SIGNING DATES FROM 20051010 TO 20051013;REEL/FRAME:016732/0774
|Mar 18, 2013||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|Dec 9, 2014||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING, LLC, WASHINGTON
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:MICROSOFT CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:034543/0001
Effective date: 20141014