|Publication number||US7680109 B2|
|Application number||US 10/487,128|
|Publication date||Mar 16, 2010|
|Filing date||Aug 14, 2002|
|Priority date||Aug 21, 2001|
|Also published as||DE60236092D1, US20040213179, WO2003017703A1|
|Publication number||10487128, 487128, PCT/2002/1452, PCT/SE/2/001452, PCT/SE/2/01452, PCT/SE/2002/001452, PCT/SE/2002/01452, PCT/SE2/001452, PCT/SE2/01452, PCT/SE2001452, PCT/SE2002/001452, PCT/SE2002/01452, PCT/SE2002001452, PCT/SE200201452, PCT/SE201452, US 7680109 B2, US 7680109B2, US-B2-7680109, US7680109 B2, US7680109B2|
|Inventors||Niklas Lundin, Karl-Henrik Henriksson, Tobjorn Lundin, Lars Ekeroth, Frank Hundscheidt, Lohmar Thorsten, Ralf Keller|
|Original Assignee||Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ)|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (7), Non-Patent Citations (2), Referenced by (9), Classifications (32), Legal Events (3)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
The present invention relates to multicast services for mobile networks. The present invention also relates to system components in mobile networks rendering such multicast services possible. More specifically the invention relates to multicasting in a GPRS network.
Multicasting is a service that permits a source to send a message to a plurality of specific recipients. The notion multicasting typically involves that only one copy of the message will pass over any link in a network and copies of the message will be made only where paths diverge. From a network perspective, multicasting dramatically reduces overall bandwidth consumption, since data is replicated in the network at appropriate points.
With Internet Protocol IP multicast, receivers do not need to know who or where the senders are and senders do not need to know who the receivers are. Neither senders nor receivers need to care about the network topology as the network optimises delivery. The distribution of information via IP multicast is performed on the base of a hierarchical connection of the hosts, like for example a tree. Several algorithms have been proposed for building multicast distribution trees, like for example spanning trees, shared-trees, source-based trees, core-based trees. The descriptions of the corresponding algorithms can be found in “IP telephony: Packet-based multimedia communications systems” O. Hersent, D. Gurle, D. Petit, Addison-Wesley, Harlow, 2000. After the establishment of the distribution tree, the distribution of the information is done by the IP multicast routing protocols. The detailed description of the corresponding IP multicast routing protocols can be also found in the above-mentioned document.
An advantage of the IP multicast is the support of the heterogeneous receivers. Sending the different media to different multicast groups allows receivers to decide which media to receive. Similarly, if a sender layers its video or audio stream, different receivers can choose to receive different amounts of traffic and hence different qualities. To do this the sender must code the video as a base layer it means with the lowest quality that might be acceptable and a number of enhancement layers. Each enhancement layer adds more quality at the expense of more bandwidth. For video transmission, these additional layers might increase the frame rate or increase the spatial resolution of the images or both. Each layer is sent to a different multicast group and receivers can individually decide to how many layers they wish to subscribe.
Local area networks have supported multicasting for many years. For typical CSMA (Carrier Sense Multiplex Access) networks where nodes share a common communication medium, multicasting is easy to support. Ethernet for instance supports unicast addresses, multicasting addresses and the network broadcast address. A specially addressed packet can be read off the communication medium by multiple hosts.
Extending multicasting capabilities to inter-networks however led to the introduction of a router at the edge of a network in order to figure out dynamically how to forward the datagram, whereby a datagram denotes a data packet which is established on the IP layer. The way of forwarding is delivered from the address included in the header of the datagram and from the routing table, which is administrated in the router. There are a few possibilities of doing the multicast addressing. The normal way of doing multicast addressing is by using dedicated multicast addresses. These addresses denote groups rather than individual recipients (as is the case with normal IP addresses). The task of the router in this case is to encode the destination addresses and to route it according to the information from the routing table.
Multicast is a receiver-based concept, it means the receivers join a particular multicast session group by informing a corresponding multicast router and traffic is delivered to all members of that group by the network infrastructure. The transmission can be performed either from one user to many users, the so-called one-to-many multicast or many users send information to many receivers, the so-called many-to-many transmission. Within the IP multicast, the membership of a multicast session group is dynamic it means that the hosts may join and leave groups at any time.
The technical background for multicasting is covered in the following:
IP Telephony: Packet-based multimedia communications systems. Hersent, O., Gurle, D., Petit, D., Addison-Wesley, Harlow, 2000.
According to known GPRS and UMTS networks, the mobile terminated down-link traffic is routed using identities which are designed to only handle point to point traffic. In order to reach multiple end users, multiple unicast messages have to be sent.
The technical background about GPRS in GSM and UMTS is covered in the following:
3GPP TS 03.60 V7.5.0 (2001-01) 3rd Generation Partnership Project;
Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects,
Digital cellular Telecommunications System (Phase 2+),
General Packet Radio Service (GPRS),
Service Description, Stage 2 (Release 1998).
3GPP TS 23.060 V3.6.0 (2001-01)
3rd Generation Partnership Project;
Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects,
General Packet Radio Service (GPRS),
Service Description, Stage 2 (Release 1999).
There is currently no mechanism available for point to multipoint traffic for wireless terminals when IP addressing is not used, c.f. IP multicast.
The present invention achieves a more efficient multicast transmission in General Packet Radio Networks, more specifically those portions of the GPRS network according to 3GPP specifications that are denoted the Gn, Gp and the Iu-PS interface.
It is a first object of the invention to make it possible to introduce multicast services in mobile networks, such that resources are used efficiently. That is, transmitting information to a large group of receivers simultaneously while utilising a minimum of bandwidth.
It is another object to introduce multicast tunnels, which are easily managed especially by the serving node.
It is a further object to reduce the number of multiple multipoint GTP tunnels between the GGSN and each corresponding SGSN and the SGSN and each corresponding RAN in situations where many users are requesting multicast data simultaneously.
It is a further object to set forth a method for establishing multicast tunnels enabling combined IP stream content of multiple multicast groups.
It is a further object to set forth a method for establishing multicast tunnels enabling IP stream content related to a single multicast group.
Further advantages will appear from the following detailed description and the drawings of the invention.
The present invention introduces a concept that allows several users to listen to multicast transmissions in a wireless network and more specifically a GPRS network. This concept comprises an application level multicast session with the following properties:
The transmission is simplex, unidirectional, sent from one source to many end users, located at one or many geographical sites. There is one source and many end users. The user must register to the service to get the information needed (e.g. decoding, ciphering key etc.) for the terminal to listen to the transmission via a new type of PDP context, which several users can share.
The user may be notified of the presence of a certain multicast transmission, either by active search for available services in a certain area, e.g. via a web page, or by getting information about the service via e.g. SMS or a push service.
Packet streams are routed in the GGSN, SGSN1 and SGSN2 and RAN1-RAN5, by means of routing tables. An excerpt of routing tables has been shown in the present example, namely routing table RTR10 relating to RAN1, RTR20 relating to RAN2, RTR30 and RTS10 relating to SGSN1.
In the present example the mobile stations wishes to receive multicasting services of the following types: A first multicast group MG7 of a first high quality of service (QoS), a first multicast group of a lower quality of service (QoS) MG7L, a second multicast group MG8 of a first high quality of service and a second multicast group of a lower quality. All these services are rendered available by the ISP either directly to a number of GGSNs, or via IP Multicast.
It should be noted that in a real system, a higher number of mobile stations would typically be present. Moreover, many more services would be demanded and at least four QoS classes would be available. However, for illustrative purposes the above simple example has been chosen.
According to the first embodiment of the invention, the GPRS tunnel protocol (GTP) renders the multicast connectivity possible. A GTP tunnel is two-way, point to point path. By encapsulating a packet or a stream of IP packets with a tunnel specific header, data is tunnelled to a tunnel endpoint. In the following, the term multicast tunnel will be used for referring to a GTP tunnel that is adapted to carry an IP stream of multicast content, that is, content which potentially can or will be received by a plurality of end points.
According to the first embodiment of the invention, a first multicast GTP tunnel, GTPT1, shown in
In analogy with the above, tunnel GTPT2 carrying stream, IPSTR8 is transmitted to mobile station M8 being the sole member of multicast group MG8. Tunnel GTPT3 carrying IP Stream IPSTR7L is distributed to mobile station M6 and tunnel GTPT4 carrying IPSTR8L is routed to RAN1, RAN2 and RAN3 in accordance with routing table RTS10 for reaching mobile stations M2, M5 and M8.
Routing tables RTR10, RTR20 and RTR30, shown in
It is noted that the SGSN does not examine the content of the tunnels (packets), but that the SGSN just redirects the tunnels according to the routing table RTR10.
Hence, a PDP type multipoint service, which enables the above multicasting traffic, has been set forth.
In order to initiate the above multicast service session, the end-users initiate a PDP Context Activation with the PDP type Multipoint, the latter being the designation for the service.
Preferably, the PDP type Multipoint identity should be unique in the whole PLMN. The reason for this is that it will be possible to avoid duplicate transmissions of the same content when a terminal moves from one SGSN to another. The multipoint PDP context is activated in the respective node when the first user appears. For each consecutive new user, the context is modified, whereby the new user is added.
The functionality in the Core Network (CN) can be generalised as follows:
The PDP type multipoint service may be extended to the radio access network general functionality in the Radio Access Network (RAN). The RAN nodes should be aware of the PDP Context Multipoint to such a level that transmissions may be sent, per cell, or broadcasted, when an active user is present. It shall be possible to have one transmission per RAN cell that is received by many terminals.
Multicast Tunnel Establishment
The procedure for setting up a multicasting session, according to the first embodiment of the invention—denoted the PDP Context Multipoint Activation Procedure—shall now be dealt with in more detail by initially referring to the following example. A PDP context refers to the procedure by which a mobile station will be able to perform packet switched communication with an external packet data network, including making it possible to route data streams to appropriate nodes in the network:
User M1 in
With reference to
1) The MS sends an Activate PDP Context Request (e.g. PDP Type=Multipoint, Access Point Name, QoS Requested) message to the SGSN. Access Point Name is a logical name referring to the external packet data network and/or to a service that the subscriber wishes to connect. QoS Requested indicates the desired QoS profile.
2) The SGSN validates the Activate PDP Context Request using PDP Type and Access Point Name provided by the MS and the PDP context subscription records. Next the SGSN checks if the requested PDP Context already is activated by another MS, if so, the SGSN adds the MS to the PDP context list and continues with step 4. Otherwise, the SGSN sends a Create PDP Context Request (e.g. PDP Type=Multipoint, Access Point Name, QoS Negotiated, unique id) message to the affected GGSN.
3) The GGSN creates a new entry in its PDP context table, if the PDP context is not already active in the GGSN (by another SGSN). The new entry allows the GGSN to route PDUs from the external PDP network to the SGSN(s), which will send the packets on to the affected RAN's. The GGSN also may register to an IP Multicast group for this context if so configured.
The GGSN then returns a Create PDP Context Response (e.g. TEID, PDP Address, QoS Negotiated, Charging Id, Cause, unique id) message to the SGSN. PDP Address is included if the GGSN allocated a PDP address.
4) The SGSN sends a Create PDP Context Multipoint (e.g. unique id, QoS negotiated) to the RAN. The RAN registers the new Multipoint user and makes sure that the cell where the user is located gets the multipoint transmission.
5) The RAN answers the SGSN with a Create PDP Context Multipoint Response.
6) The SGSN sends an Activate PDP Context Accept (e.g. PDP Type=Multipoint, PDP Address, QoS Negotiated, unique id, decryption keys) message to the MS. At this point the MS can receive and possibly decode the Multipoint transmission.
Note: It should be possible to extend the now standardised Protocol Configuration Options (PCO) used for PDP Context Activation to transport e.g. unique id, ciphering and decryption keys.
According to the above embodiment, it is possible for several terminals to receive the same simultaneous transmission, whereby the IP address is not used to identify the receiving terminal. Hence, many simultaneous transmissions in both the CN and RAN will be avoided. The above solution is easy to integrate with the RAN, since it is handled on the application level.
According to the second embodiment of the invention, a solution is described wherein multiple multipoint services are multiplexed or combined on the same given multipoint GTP tunnel between the GGSN and the SGSN and/or between the SGSN and the RAN. Thus, instead of using a dedicated GTP tunnel per multicast stream between the GGSN and the SGSN, this embodiment multiplexes multiple multicast streams on a common, possibly pre-configured, GTP tunnel.
According to the second embodiment, the GTP tunnels are used to transport the multicast data—i.e. a single copy for one or more clients on each interface—from the GGSN to the SGSN and from the SGSN to the RAN. In the following, these are called multipoint GTP tunnels.
The multiplexing involves that more IP streams are combined within the same GTP tunnel.
The GGSN multiplexes the multicast data onto the common GTP tunnel. The SGSN's de-multiplex the multicast data and perform the replication of the data for all group members for the corresponding multicast group. Similarly the RAN's de-multiplex and replicate the data in case the concept is extended to the Iu-interface. In that case the SGSN's will not do a replication to the group members but only to the RAN's with group members, unless pre-configured multipoint tunnels are used (see below).
According to the second embodiment, there are at least two alternatives—I and II—to multiplex different multicast data on a respective multipoint GTP tunnel from the GGSN to the SGSN:
A respective MC tunnel from the GGSN to the respective SGSN is established having multicast content that matches the needs of the specific SGSN. The multicast tunnel is established whenever the particular SGSN has at least one MC group member. Multicast data relating to the specific plurality of multicast groups associated with a particular SGSN, is multiplexed (as long as the link bandwidth allows) on the same common GTP tunnel to the given SGSN. Specific tunnels, formed according to the same principles as above, are established for the remaining SGSN's having at least one MC group member. At reception in the GGSN of multicast data (recognised from the corresponding MC-group address in the IP destination header field) from an ISP, the GGSN checks in its multicast tables which SGSN and tunnel combinations should receive the multicast data and replicates and forwards the stream accordingly.
Pre-configured MC tunnels from the GGSN to the respective SGSN's (i.e. either all or a subset of the SGSN's) are established on a default base. Multicast data relating to a plurality of multicast groups is multiplexed (as long as the link bandwidth allows) on the same common GTP tunnel to a given SGSN. Tunnels with identical contents are established to the other respective SGSN's. Note that it is not necessary to have exactly the same multicast streams multiplexed in each tunnel. E.g. tunnel 1 may multiplex stream 1 and 3, whereas tunnel 2 may multiplex stream 2, 3, and 4. The respective SGSN's discard multicast data for which they do not have any group members in their respective area. The GGSN will replicate the stream towards all SGSN's or to just a subset of all SGSN's in the network. A dedicated table (pre-configured) may be used for this purpose. The GGSN then replicates the data and sends it on the corresponding tunnels to the SGSN's. For this reason, the GGSN builds up tables that map the incoming multicast data stream to GTP tunnels. The GGSN may collect charging or statistical data from the multicast data received and replicated.
Multiple dedicated QoS tunnels can be created between a GGSN and a SGSN (and between an SGSN and RAN). The QoS of a mobile subscriber, as indicated during a PDP context activation procedure, is taken into account for the selection of the appropriate tunnel, as shall be shown in the following. Note that also other tunnel selection criteria, such as security, tariffs etc. may be taken into account.
For the two above alternatives, at reception of the multicast data in the SGSN, the SGSN has two options, III and IV, of processing the stream:
In case multicast tunnels are applied on the Iu-PS interface, the SGSN performs a mapping of the tunnels from the Gn-interface to the Iu-PS interface. Note that this mechanism also applies when one of the interfaces (Gn or Iu-PS) supports multiplexing whereas the other interface ( ) does not support the multiplexing option. The mapping is also independent of whether the multiplex multicast tunnels are pre-configured or not.
As appears from
At reception in SGSN1, SGSN1 reads the content of the tunnelled packets and creates, by means of routing table RTR15 in
In case no multicast tunnels are applied on the Iu-PS interface, the SGSN checks in its multicast tables which group members should receive the multicast data, possibly with the corresponding QoS. The SGSN then replicates the data and forwards it to the corresponding group members (possibly in different RAN's). In case multiplexed multicasting is used on the Iu-PS interface, no or less replication may be required (depending on the number of RAN's that should receive the multicast stream). In addition, the SGSN may collect charging or statistical data from the multicast data received and replicated or propagated.
Note that although the mechanism here is described for the Gn and Gp (For the Gb interface no multicasting can be done, implying that the SGSN must always replicate the stream to the individual users) interfaces, it may apply to any part of the network where tunnelling is applied (e.g. Iu-PS between the RAN and SGSN). The solution can even be used for other tunnelling solutions such as the Layer 2 Tunnelling Protocol (L2TP). The latter also applies to the first embodiment.
Multiplexed Multicast Tunnel Establishment
As illustrated in
If no multicast tunnel exists between the SGSN and the GGSN, the SGSN initiates the process for creating a multipoint tunnel.
Both the MC-group address and the host-id (MSISDN) are sent to the GGSN.
The tunnels may already exist in case pre-configured multiplexed tunnels are used.
If a tunnel exists, but not yet for this multicast group, a new message is sent to the GGSN in order to make the GGSN aware of the existence of the multicast group.
Both the MC-group address and the host-id (MSISDN), but also the TID are sent to the GGSN. An additional indicator to denote that the MC-group is not yet part of the tunnel can be used. However, this may also be determined by the GGSN from the corresponding data storage.
If a tunnel exists and the GGSN is already informed about this specific multicast group, the SGSN optionally informs the GGSN with a new message that there is an additional multicast group member. The GGSN may use this information for statistical or charging purposes.
Both the MC-group address and the host-id (MSISDN), but also the TID are sent to the GGSN. An additional indicator to denote that the MC-group is already part of the tunnel can be used. However, this may also be determined by the GGSN from the corresponding data storage.
Instead of the SGSN sending the host-id in all three cases above, the host-id may be omitted and the GGSN just stores counters with the number of members per MC-group per SGSN.
The SGSN stores the MC-groups per TID (note that this is not absolutely necessary since the MC-group data will anyway arrive at the SGSN) and the MSISDNs per MC-group. The GGSN stores the MC-groups per TID and optionally the number of members per MC-group per SGSN or the actual host-ids of the members per MC-group per SGSN. Both the SGSN and GGSN store additional characteristics, such as the QoS, per MC-group and tunnel, if that is applicable. In the GGSN multiple tunnels to the same SGSN for the same MC-group, but with different QoS characteristics, may exist.
Multiplexed Multicast Tunnel Release
When the multipoint PDP-context is deactivated (see e.g. 3GPP TS 23.060), or the host leaves the multicast group (e.g. IGMP leave message), the SGSN checks whether this was the last member of a MC-group or even the last member of the last MC-group in a multiplexed tunnel.
If other members exist for this MC-group, the SGSN informs the GGSN that one member has de-registered from the MC-group. Depending on the data stored in the GGSN, the SGSN sends either the host-id or just a message that the counter for the MC-group is to be decreased.
If no more members exist for this MC-group but other MC-groups use the tunnel, the SGSN informs the GGSN that the last member of the MC-group has de-registered and that no more members for the MC-group exist in that SGSN. Note that the GGSN may also determine this itself, since the corresponding counter in the GGSN will be set to zero.
If no more members for any MC-group exist for the tunnel, the SGSN releases the tunnel towards the GGSN. Note that the tunnel may remain for future use if pre-configured multiplexed tunnels are used. Optionally, timers may be used to release tunnels after a certain period of inactivity.
In case tunnels are based on QoS or other characteristics, these considerations are taken into account in the selection procedures are shown and described above. E.g. instead of selecting one of the tunnels for a new MC-group, a tunnel with the appropriate QoS characteristics is selected or created if it does not exist yet.
This invention provides an efficient utilisation of scarce and expensive network resources in wireless networks.
Efficient transmission on the Gn and Gp and Iu-PS interface is achieved by transmitting only a single copy of a packet on each link. This reduces the overall transmission resources needed (and limits the need for congestion prevention, load balancing algorithms, etc.) when multiple clients for the same multicast group are located in the same or different SGSN's. Note that this also applies to scenarios with heterogeneous subscriber equipment or access networks, since layering (e.g. multiple media or multiple adaptation layers as specified in MPEG-4) of the information can be used as described in the background chapter.
Furthermore, according to the second embodiment of the invention using (pre-configured) multiplexed multicast tunnels reduces the tunnel establishment signalling between the SGSN and GGSN, which affects the session set-up times in a positive way. The set-up time is not only reduced when clients register or de-register for MC-groups but also when they change the corresponding serving SGSN (in case of hand-over). Furthermore, by using QoS-based multiplexed tunnels according to another aspect of the second embodiment, an enhanced service provisioning and multiplexing of different multicast groups on the same tunnel is achieved.
Pre-configured tunnels decrease the complexity of multicast support in a 3G network and can be seen as the first evolution step towards large-scale multicast support in mobile networks.
Another benefit is the load reduction on the content provider (e.g. streaming server) since the content only needs to be sent once for a whole multicast group.
The multipoint transmission according to the invention is especially advantageous for the air interface of mobile systems, especially in situations where resources are limited, such as when hundreds of users, present in the same mobile communication cell, are receiving the same transmission.
There are many possible applications for mobile multicast sessions. To name a few: Transmission to spectators at a football arena with replays of the latest goal is one example. Traffic information or commercials (e.g. streaming video) within a certain geographical area are among the numerous other applications, which would be interesting to access wirelessly.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US20010017856 *||Jan 18, 2001||Aug 30, 2001||Nokia Mobile Phones Ltd.||Address acquisition|
|US20010036175 *||Feb 26, 2001||Nov 1, 2001||Tuija Hurtta||Setting a communication channel|
|US20020049066 *||Sep 17, 2001||Apr 25, 2002||Ahti Muhonen||Method and network element for forwarding multicast messages|
|US20020057663 *||Nov 15, 2001||May 16, 2002||Lim Byung Keun||Multicast and broadcast transmission method and apparatus of a CDMA mobile communication network|
|US20030039237 *||Jul 23, 1998||Feb 27, 2003||Jan E Forslow||Common access between a mobile communications network and an external network with selectable packet-switched and circuit-switched services|
|US20030147389 *||Apr 10, 2001||Aug 7, 2003||Wolfgang Zirwas||Method for transmitting broadband, ip-based data streams in a point-to-many-points communications network|
|EP1071296A1||Jul 22, 1999||Jan 24, 2001||Alcatel Alsthom Compagnie Generale D'electricite||Method to multi-cast data packets to mobile stations, and related gateway, service and routing nodes|
|1||3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects; Broadcast and Multicast Services; (Release 5), 3GPP TS 22.946 v1.0.0 (Jun. 2001).|
|2||3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects; Broadcast/Multicast Service; (Release 6), 3GPP TR 23.846 v1.0.0 (Jan. 2002), see Chapter 6.9.1, chapter 7, annex A.|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US8503438 *||Nov 18, 2010||Aug 6, 2013||Stoke, Inc.||Method and system for selectively bypassing packet core network within a session based on traffic type|
|US8718688 *||Aug 27, 2010||May 6, 2014||Interdigital Patent Holdings, Inc.||Method and apparatus for solving limited addressing space in machine-to-machine (M2M) environments|
|US8842651||Nov 28, 2012||Sep 23, 2014||Motorola Solutions, Inc.||Access point groupings bridging tunneled traffic for a communication network|
|US9031499 *||Aug 11, 2012||May 12, 2015||Audi Ag||Car-to-X communication system, participant in such a system, and method for receiving radio signals in such a system|
|US20110053619 *||Aug 27, 2010||Mar 3, 2011||Interdigital Patent Holdings, Inc.||Method and apparatus for solving limited addressing space in machine-to-machine (m2m) environments|
|US20110116499 *||Nov 18, 2010||May 19, 2011||Stoke, Inc.||Method and system for selectively bypassing packet core network within a session based on traffic type|
|US20120307764 *||Dec 6, 2012||Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd||Method for establishing bearer for machine to machine service and network transmission device|
|US20130155948 *||Mar 30, 2012||Jun 20, 2013||Interdigital Patent Holdings, Inc.||System and method for sharing a common pdp context|
|US20140242904 *||Aug 11, 2012||Aug 28, 2014||Mohinder Pandey||Car-to-x communication system, participant in such a system, and method for receiving radio signals in such a system|
|U.S. Classification||370/390, 370/389, 370/352, 370/401, 370/348|
|International Classification||H04L12/701, H04L12/801, H04L12/851, H04W92/02, H04W4/00, H04W40/02, H04W76/02, H04W12/00, H04L29/06, H04L12/28, H04W88/16, H04L12/18|
|Cooperative Classification||H04W76/025, H04W4/00, H04L47/24, H04W88/16, H04W92/02, H04W76/022, H04L45/00, H04W40/02, H04L12/189, H04L47/14|
|European Classification||H04W76/02C, H04L12/18W, H04L47/24, H04L47/14, H04L45/00|
|Feb 19, 2004||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL), SWEDEN
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:LUNDIN, NIKLAS;HENRIKSSON, KARL-HENRIK;LUNDIN, TORBJORN;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:015531/0767;SIGNING DATES FROM 20040119 TO 20040120
Owner name: TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL),SWEDEN
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:LUNDIN, NIKLAS;HENRIKSSON, KARL-HENRIK;LUNDIN, TORBJORN;AND OTHERS;SIGNING DATES FROM 20040119 TO 20040120;REEL/FRAME:015531/0767
|Nov 9, 2010||CC||Certificate of correction|
|Mar 18, 2013||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4