|Publication number||US7780086 B2|
|Application number||US 11/823,818|
|Publication date||Aug 24, 2010|
|Filing date||Jun 28, 2007|
|Priority date||Jun 28, 2007|
|Also published as||EP2168075A1, EP2168075B1, US20090001166, WO2009006419A1|
|Publication number||11823818, 823818, US 7780086 B2, US 7780086B2, US-B2-7780086, US7780086 B2, US7780086B2|
|Inventors||Edward Barkan, Mark Drzymala, Igor Vinogradov|
|Original Assignee||Symbol Technologies, Inc.|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (28), Non-Patent Citations (1), Referenced by (32), Classifications (12), Legal Events (5)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
Flat bed laser readers, also known as horizontal slot scanners, have been used to electro-optically read one-dimensional bar code symbols, particularly of the Universal Product Code (UPC) type, at a point-of-transaction workstation in supermarkets, warehouse clubs, department stores, and other kinds of retailers for many years. As exemplified by U.S. Pat. No. 5,059,779; U.S. Pat. No. 5,124,539 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,200,599, a single, horizontal window is set flush with, and built into, a horizontal countertop of the workstation. Products to be purchased bear an identifying symbol and are typically slid across the horizontal window through which a multitude of scan lines is projected in a generally upwards direction. When at least one of the scan lines sweeps over a symbol associated with a product, the symbol is processed and read.
The multitude of scan lines is generated by a scan pattern generator which includes a laser for emitting a laser beam at a mirrored component mounted on a shaft for rotation by a motor about an axis. A plurality of stationary mirrors is arranged about the axis. As the mirrored component turns, the laser beam is successively reflected onto the stationary mirrors for reflection therefrom through the horizontal window as a scan pattern of the scan lines.
It is also known to provide a point-of-transaction workstation not only with a generally horizontal window, but also with a generally vertical window that faces an operator at the workstation. The generally vertical window is oriented generally perpendicularly to the horizontal window, or is slightly rearwardly or forwardly inclined. The laser scan pattern generator within this dual window or bi-optical workstation also projects the multitude of scan lines in a generally outward direction through the vertical window toward the operator. The generator for the vertical window can be the same as or different from the generator for the horizontal window. The operator slides the products past either window from right to left, or from left to right, in a “swipe” mode. Alternatively, the operator merely presents the symbol on the product to a central region of either window in a “presentation” mode. The choice depends on operator preference or on the layout of the workstation.
Sometimes, the vertical window is not built into the workstation as a permanent installation. Instead, a vertical slot scanner is configured as a portable reader that is placed on the countertop of an existing horizontal slot scanner in a hands-free mode of operation. In the frequent event that large, heavy, or bulky products, that cannot easily be brought to the reader, have symbols that are required to be read, then the operator may also manually grasp the portable reader and lift it off, and remove it from, the countertop for reading the symbols in a handheld mode of operation.
Each product must be oriented by the operator with the symbol facing away from the operator and generally towards either window of the bi-optical workstation. Hence, the operator cannot see exactly where the symbol is during scanning. In typical “blind-aiming” usage, it is not uncommon for the operator to repeatedly swipe or present a single symbol several times before the symbol is successfully read, thereby slowing down transaction processing and reducing productivity.
The blind-aiming of the symbol is made more difficult because the position and orientation of the symbol are variable. The symbol may be located low or high, or right to left, on the product, or anywhere in between, or on any of six sides of a box-shaped product. The symbol may be oriented in a “picket fence” orientation in which the elongated parallel bars of the one-dimensional UPC symbol are vertical, or in a “ladder” orientation in which the symbol bars are horizontal, or at any orientation angle in between.
In such an environment, it is important that the laser scan lines located at, and projected from, either window provide a full coverage scan zone which extends down as close as possible to the countertop, and as high as possible above the countertop, and as wide as possible across the width of the countertop. The scan patterns projected into space in front of the windows grow rapidly in order to cover areas on products that are positioned not on the windows, but several inches therefrom. The scan zone must include scan lines oriented to read symbols positioned in any possible way across the entire volume of the scan zone.
As advantageous as these laser-based, point-of-transaction workstations are in processing transactions involving products associated with one-dimensional symbols each having a row of bars and spaces spaced apart along one direction, the workstations cannot process stacked symbols, such as Code 49 which introduced the concept of vertically stacking a plurality of rows of bar and space patterns in a single symbol, as described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,794,239, or PDF417 which increased the amount of data that could be represented or stored on a given amount of surface area, as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,304,786, or two-dimensional symbols.
Both one- and two-dimensional symbols, as well as stacked symbols, can also be read by employing solid-state imagers which have a one- or two-dimensional array of cells or photosensors that correspond to image elements or pixels in a field of view of the imager. Such an imager may include a one- or two-dimensional charge coupled device (CCD) or a complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) device, as well as associated circuits for producing electronic signals corresponding to the one- or two-dimensional array of pixel information over the field of view.
It is therefore known to use a solid-state imager for capturing a monochrome image of a symbol as, for example, disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,703,349. It is also known to use a solid-state imager with multiple buried channels for capturing a full color image of a target as, for example, disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,613,895. It is common to provide a two-dimensional CCD with a 640×480 resolution commonly found in VGA monitors, although other resolution sizes are possible.
It is also known to install the solid-state imager, analogous to that conventionally used in a consumer digital camera, in a bi-optical, point-of-transaction workstation, as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 7,191,947 in which the dual use of both the solid-state imager and the laser scan pattern generator in the same workstation is disclosed. It is possible to replace all of the laser scan pattern generators with solid-state imagers in order to improve reliability and to enable the reading of two-dimensional and stacked symbols, as well as other targets.
However, it is thought that the overall imager-based reader would require about ten to twelve imagers in order to read a symbol that could be positioned anywhere on all six sides of a product. To be successful in the marketplace, an all imager-based reader must eliminate the need for so many imagers to bring the cost of all the imagers, as well as the cost of each imager, down to an acceptable level, and it must also match, or at least be comparable to, the working range, processing speed, productivity and performance of a laser-based reader. In the case of a bi-optical workstation having dual windows, the all imager-based reader must use similar window sizes and must also be able to scan anywhere across the windows and over a comparable working range as that of a laser-based reader, so that operators can achieve the high scanning productivity they have come to expect without any need to learn a new scanning technique.
One feature of this invention resides, briefly stated, in a reader for, and a method of, electro-optically reading indicia, comprising a housing and a plurality of solid-state imagers at the housing, for capturing light from the indicia along different fields of view. Each imager preferably comprises a two-dimensional, charge coupled device (CCD) array of submegapixel size, e.g., 752 pixels wide×480 pixels high, in order to reduce the costs of the imagers, as compared to supermegapixel arrays. Each imager includes an illuminator for illuminating the indicia with illumination light from illumination light sources, e.g., light emitting diodes (LEDs). A controller is operative for controlling each illuminator to illuminate the indicia, for controlling each imager to capture the illumination light returning from the indicia over an exposure time period to produce electrical signals indicative of the indicia being read, and for processing the electrical signals to read the indicia. Each illuminator is only operative during the exposure time period. Each imager is controlled to capture the light from the indicia during different exposure time periods to avoid mutual interference among the illuminators. At least one of the imagers captures the light from the indicia along a return axis, and its illuminator directs the illumination light along an illumination axis that is angled toward the return axis.
In accordance with one aspect of this invention, the imagers are commonly mounted on a circuit board. This assembly enables joint installation at, and joint removal from, the housing for ease of serviceability. Advantageously, each illuminator is commonly mounted on the same circuit board. The controller is also preferably commonly mounted on the circuit board. Thus, by mounting most, if not all, of the electrical components on the same board, field maintenance is simplified.
In a preferred embodiment, the housing has one window located in a generally horizontal plane, and another window located in a generally upright plane that intersects the generally horizontal plane, thereby comprising a bi-optical workstation. Preferably, the circuit board on which the electrical components are mounted is no more than 100 millimeters below the generally horizontal plane. The imagers capture the light from the indicia through at least one of the windows. A first sub-plurality, e.g., three, of the imagers captures the light from the indicia through one of the windows, and a second sub-plurality, e.g., another three, of the imagers captures the light from the indicia through another of the windows. Each sub-plurality of the imagers captures the light from the indicia over different, intersecting fields of view.
In still another aspect of the invention, the return illumination light travels along an optical path within the housing between a respective window and a respective imager for a distance of at least thirty-five centimeters. Folding optics, such as mirrors, are operative for folding the optical path within the housing. Also, non-rotationally symmetrical optics, such as mirrors and lenses, are operative for optically modifying the field of view of at least one imager to correspond with at least one of the dimensions of the window. The optical elements within the housing, for folding at least one of the optical paths, are preferably commonly mounted on a support, particularly an enclosure that keeps dust, dirt, moisture, and like contaminants from reaching these optical elements. This support enables joint installation of the optical elements at, and joint removal of the optical elements from, the housing for ease of serviceability. The non-rotationally symmetrical optics for optically modifying the field of view of at least one of the imagers are preferably mounted on the respective imager.
By way of numerical example, the generally horizontal window in a conventional laser-based bi-optical workstation measures about four inches in width by about six inches in length, and the generally vertical window measures about six inches in width by about ten inches in length. The field of view of an imager capturing illumination light from the imager through a respective window does not inherently have these dimensions at the respective window and, hence, the field of view must be modified so that it matches the dimensions of the respective window at the respective window, thereby enabling indicia to be reliably read when located anywhere at the respective window, as well as within a range of working distances therefrom.
A weighing scale and/or an electronic article surveillance (EAS) deactivator and/or a radio identification device (RFID) reader are preferably located at the housing.
In accordance with another feature of this invention, the method of electro-optically reading indicia, is performed by capturing light from the indicia along different fields of view of a plurality of solid-state imagers at a housing, and commonly mounting the imagers on a circuit board for joint installation at, and joint removal from, the housing for ease of serviceability. Preferably, the housing is configured with one window located in a generally horizontal plane, and another window located in a generally upright plane that intersects the generally horizontal plane, each window being configured with dimensions.
In accordance with another aspect of this invention, optical elements are provided for folding at least one of the optical paths, and for optically modifying the field of view of at least one of the imagers to correspond with at least one of the dimensions of at least one of the windows. The optical elements for folding the optical path are commonly mounted on a support for joint installation at, and joint removal from, the housing for ease of serviceability. The optical elements for optically modifying the field of view are preferably mounted on each imager.
Hence, an all imager-based reader has been proposed that eliminates the need for ten to twelve imagers in order to read indicia that could be positioned anywhere on all six sides of a product. The cost of all the imagers, as well as the cost of each imager, has been reduced to an acceptable level. The all imager-based reader matches, or at least is comparable to, the working range, processing speed, productivity and performance of the laser-based reader. In the case of a bi-optical workstation having dual windows, the all imager-based reader uses similar window sizes and the indicia is able to be scanned anywhere across the windows and over a comparable working range as that of the laser-based reader, so that operators can achieve the high scanning productivity they have come to expect without any need to learn a new scanning technique.
The novel features which are considered as characteristic of the invention are set forth in particular in the appended claims. The invention itself, however, both as to its construction and its method of operation, together with additional objects and advantages thereof, will be best understood from the following description of specific embodiments when read in connection with the accompanying drawings.
As schematically shown in
In use, an operator 24, such as a person working at a supermarket checkout counter, processes a product 26 bearing a UPC symbol 28 thereon, past the windows 12, 16 by swiping the product across a respective window in the abovementioned swipe mode, or by presenting the product at the respective window in the abovementioned presentation mode. The symbol 28 may located on any of the top, bottom, right, left, front and rear, sides of the product, and at least one, if not more, of the imagers 30 will capture the illumination light reflected, scattered, or otherwise returning from the symbol through one or both windows. The imagers are preferably looking through the windows at around 45° so that they can each see a side of the product that is generally perpendicular to, as well as generally parallel to, a respective window.
As also schematically shown in
In operation, the microprocessor 34 sends successive command signals to the illuminators 32 to pulse the LEDs for a short time period of 100 microseconds or less, and successively energizes the imagers 30 to collect light from a target only during said time period, also known as the exposure time period. By acquiring a target image during this brief time period, the image of the target is not excessively blurred even in the presence of relative motion between the imagers and the target.
There are several different types of targets that have particular utility for the enhancement of the operation of the workstation. The target may be a personal check, a credit card, or a debit card presented by a customer for payment of the products being purchased. The operator need only swipe or present these payment targets at one of the windows for image capture.
The target may also be a signature, a driver's license, or the consumer himself or herself. Capturing an image of the driver's license is particularly useful since many licenses are encoded with two-dimensional indicia bearing age information, which is useful in validating a customer's age and the customer's ability to purchase age-related products, such as alcoholic beverages or tobacco products.
The target may be the operator himself or herself, which is used for video surveillance for security purposes. Thus, it can be determined if the operator is actually scanning the products, or passing them around the window in an effort to bypass the window and not charge the customer in a criminal practice known in retailing as “sweethearting”.
The target may, of course, be a two-dimensional symbol whose use is becoming more widespread, especially in manufacturing environments and in package delivery. Sometimes, the target includes various lengths of truncated symbols of the type frequently found on frequent shopper cards, coupons, loyalty cards, in which case the area imagers can read these additional symbols.
The energization of the imagers 30 can be manual and initiated by the operator. For example, the operator can depress a button, or a foot pedal, at the workstation. The energization can also be automatic such that the imagers operate in a continuous image acquisition mode, which is the desired mode for video surveillance of the operator, as well as for decoding two-dimensional symbols. In the preferred embodiment, all the imagers will be continuously sequentially energized for scanning symbols until such time as there has been a period of inactivity that exceeds a pre-program time interval. For example, if no symbols have been scanned for ten minutes, then after this time period has elapsed, the reader enters a power-savings mode in which one or more of the imagers will be omitted from sequential energization. Alternatively, illumination levels may be reduced or turned off. At least one imager will remain active for periodically capturing images. If the active imager detects anything changing within its field of view, this will indicate to the operator that a product bearing a symbol is moving into the field of view, and illumination and image capture will resume to provide high performance scanning.
As previously stated,
As shown in
Imager 2 and its associated optics is mirror symmetrical to imager 1 and its associated optics. Imager 2 faces generally vertically upward toward an inclined folding mirror 2 c directly overhead at the left side of the window 12. The folding mirror 2 c faces another inclined narrow folding mirror 2 a located at the right side of the window 12. The folding mirror 2 a faces still another inclined wide folding mirror 2 b adjacent the mirror 2 c. The folding mirror 2 b faces out through the generally horizontal window 12 toward the right side of the workstation.
Imager 3 and its associated optics are located generally centrally between imagers 1 and 2 and their associated optics. Imager 3 faces generally vertically upward toward an inclined folding mirror 3 c directly overhead generally centrally of the window 12 at one end thereof. The folding mirror 3 c faces another inclined folding mirror 3 a located at the opposite end of the window 12. The folding mirror 3 a faces out through the window 12 in an upward direction toward the raised housing portion 18.
As described so far, a trio of imagers 1, 2 and 3 capture light along different, intersecting fields of view along different directions through the generally horizontal window 12. Turning now to
More particularly, imager 4 faces generally vertically upward toward an inclined folding mirror 4 c directly overhead at a right side of the window 16. The folding mirror 4 c faces another inclined narrow folding mirror 4 a located at a left side of the window 16. The folding mirror 4 a faces still another inclined wide folding mirror 4 b adjacent the mirror 4 c. The folding mirror 4 b faces out through the generally vertical window 16 toward the left side of the workstation.
Imager 5 and its associated optics is mirror symmetrical to imager 4 and its associated optics. Imager 5 faces generally vertically upward toward an inclined folding mirror 5 c directly overhead at the left side of the window 16. The folding mirror 5 c faces another inclined narrow folding mirror 5 a located at the right side of the window 16. The folding mirror 5 a faces still another inclined wide folding mirror 5 b adjacent the mirror 5 c. The folding mirror 5 b faces out through the generally vertical window 16 toward the right side of the workstation.
Imager 6 and its associated optics are located generally centrally between imagers 4 and 5 and their associated optics. Imager 6 faces generally vertically upward toward an inclined folding mirror 6 a directly overhead generally centrally of the window 16 at an upper end thereof. The folding mirror 6 a faces out through the window 16 in a downward direction toward the countertop 14.
The all imager-based reader described herein is capable of reading indicia located anywhere on all six sides of a product, and to do so within a large scan volume over a relatively long working range. Hence, the all imager-based reader of this invention eliminates the need for ten to twelve imagers in order to read the indicia that could be positioned anywhere on all six sides of the product. The cost of all the imagers has been reduced to an acceptable level. The cost of the individual imagers must also be minimized and, hence, relatively inexpensive imagers having submegapixel sizes are preferred. For example, a wide VGA sensor array of 752×480 pixels can be used.
Each array should have a global shutter so that the captured images will not be disturbed by motion of the indicia relative to the window(s) during the exposure time period. The indicia can be presented or swiped at speeds up to around 100 inches per second across any part of either window. For an imager to be able to read an indicium that is moving rapidly, the indicium must be brightly illuminated by the illuminator 32 so that a short exposure time can be used. Bright illumination light shining out of either window can be annoying or uncomfortable to the operator, so the illumination light sources must not be directly viewable by the operator, or by a consumer standing nearby. A rolling or a mechanical shutter could also be employed.
In a conventional laser-based bi-optical workstation, the generally horizontal window measures about four inches in width by about six inches in length, and the generally vertical window measures about six inches in width by about ten inches in length. These large windows are filled with scan lines that project out several inches from the window, enabling indicia to be scanned anywhere within a large volume. The all imager-based bi-optical workstation of this invention preferably uses similar window sizes and must also be able to scan anywhere across the windows and over a comparable working range as a laser-based workstation. The field of view of an imager capturing illumination light from the imager through a respective window does not inherently have these dimensions at the respective window and, hence, the field of view must be modified so that it matches the dimensions of the respective window at the respective window, thereby enabling indicia to be reliably read when located anywhere at the respective window, as well as within a range of working distances therefrom.
To achieve these goals, the optical path length from each imager to a respective window is maximized to enable filling the windows with their combined fields of view, while still allowing a narrow divergence angle of each field of view. This narrow divergence angle extends the range over which adequate pixel resolution is maintained. The folding mirrors 1 a,1 b,1 c; 2 a,2 b,2 c; 3 a,3 c; 4 a,4 b,4 c; 5 a,5 b,5 c; and 6 a are used to fit the long optical path within the limited depth and other housing dimensions that are typical of bi-optical workstations. An adequately small divergence angle can be achieved with an optical path length of around eighteen to twenty inches. Shorter optical path lengths can be used, but the working range of adequate resolution will be reduced since a wider divergence angle will be needed to create an adequately sized field of view. Alternatively, a narrower divergence angle can be used with a shorter optical path, but the size of the field of view at the respective window will be reduced, which makes the reader more difficult to use. This may be satisfactory for less demanding scanning applications.
An aspect ratio of the field of view of an imager is normally the same as the aspect ratio of the pixel array. For example, if the array is 752×480 pixels, then the aspect ratio of the field of view is 752/480, or 1.56:1. Another unique and important aspect of this invention is that non-rotationally symmetrical optical elements, such as wider folding mirrors 1 b, 2 b, 4 b and 5 b, are used in the optical paths of some of the imagers, e.g., imagers 1, 2, 4 and 5, so as to modify the aspect ratio of their fields of view. The wider or longer folding mirrors 1 b, 2 b, 4 b and 5 b, as compared to their respectively associated narrower or shorter folding mirrors 1 a, 2 a, 4 a and 5 a, expands the respective field of view. This allows the shape of the fields of view to better fill the windows without being partially blocked by the edges of the windows, and also increases resolution of indicia that is tilted with respect to an optical axis of a respective imager. Other than wider mirrors, the field of view can also be modified by a lens or a lens surface integral within a focusing lens assembly associated with the respective imager.
A primary example of a situation where the reader must be able to read the indicia even when tilted with respect to the optical axis of the imager is the case where the indicia is flat against the generally horizontal window or against the generally vertical window, or the indicia is on a surface that is generally perpendicular to either window. The modified field of view angle of the imagers increases resolution along the 480 pixel axis (in the preferred embodiment), as compared to what it would have been if the field of view was unmodified, and if the size of the field of view in the 742 pixel dimension was the same as is needed to fill the windows with the fields of view.
In the preferred embodiment, the representative imager 1 uses the non-rotationally symmetrical optics or longer mirror 1 b to increase the width of the wide dimension of the field of view (the dimension that is 752 pixels wide) by around 50%, as compared to what it would be with conventional rotationally symmetrical optics. The same is true for imager 2, imager 4 and imager 5. Imagers 3 and 6 do not use modified fields of view in the preferred embodiment shown, but they could be modified as necessary in different designs.
The same results could be achieved by shrinking the 480 pixel axis of the field of view (as opposed to increasing the 752 pixel axis), or shrinking one axis a little and increasing the other axis a little, as necessary, to achieve the desired aspect ratio of the field of view dimensions. Any method used to modify the aspect ratio of the field of view of at least one of the imagers falls within the spirit of this invention.
The combination of long optical paths and modified fields of view of some of the imagers is what makes the preferred embodiment able to achieve adequate resolution over the necessary working range while simultaneously essentially filling the windows with fields of view so that indicia can be scanned anywhere across either window, and also enabling high resolution imaging of indicia that are tilted with respect to the optical axes of the imagers. In other reader designs, these two features may be used independently, depending on the needs of the particular reader design. For example, a reader that does not need as much range may use an imager with a modified field of view, but not an extended path length, or vice versa. Notice, however, that in the preferred embodiment, if either the optical path length was reduced, or the aspect ratios of the fields of view were unmodified, additional imagers would have been needed to achieve the same scanning performance.
In the preferred embodiment, as noted above, each imager has an associated set of LEDs 32 that illuminate the indicia. The LED illumination systems include lenses (not shown) that concentrate the LED illumination light of each illuminator into a solid angle that approximately matches the field of view of each imager. The illumination for each imager is reflected off of the same folding mirrors as the field of view of its associated imager.
In many locations, the indicia can be seen by more than one imager. For example, an indicium located flat against the horizontal window 12 can be seen by both imager 1 and imager 2. These two imagers look at the indicium from different angles, and their associated illuminators 32 illuminate the indicium from different angles. As a result, a glossy indicium which may be obscured by specular reflection from the point of view of one of the imagers 1, 2 will not be obscured as seen from the position of the other imager 2, 1, so that the indicium will still be readable. Of course, the reader's capability to read any indicium is increased by its ability to see the indicium with more than one imager, even in situations where specular reflection is not an issue.
In operation, in the preferred embodiment, the imagers will not be capturing images all at the same time. For example, imager 1 might capture an image first, followed by imager 2, imager 3, etc. Each imager will need an exposure time that is less than about 0.5 milliseconds, and each imager can capture a new image every 16.6 ms or so. Hence, if each imager captures an image approximately every 2.7 ms, all the imagers will capture an image about every 16.6 ms with no two imagers operating at the same time. The illumination LEDs 32 associated with each imager will only be energized during that imager's exposure time. This eliminates the possibility of uneven illumination that could occur if more than one set of illumination LEDs was energized at the same time. It also minimizes the peak current consumption of the entire reader, by eliminating the need to energize more than one set of illumination LEDs at the same time. Of course, it would also be possible to energize more than one imager at a time, as long as the light from any one imager did not interfere with the other imagers.
In the preferred embodiment, imagers 1, 2, 4 and 5 and their associated optics are all identical. They are focused at the same distance and use the same non-rotationally symmetrical optics to modify the aspect ratio of their respective field of view. Imagers 3 and 6 are identical to each other also. Hence, only two different imager designs are needed, thereby minimizing manufacturing cost.
Each illumination LED 32 will preferably be operating at a low duty cycle (less than around 3%) so that their illumination light will not look as bright to the human eye as they would look if they were energized continuously. Even so, since these are preferably very high powered LEDs, they can look dazzlingly bright if viewed directly. Light baffles (not shown) will therefore be installed to prevent direct viewing of the LEDs through either window by the operator. The only way to directly view the LEDs will be to position the eye in or very close to the field of view of one of the imagers. These fields of view and their associated illuminators do not project into the operator's eyes, or into the eyes of consumers who may be standing nearby during the reading process. Notice that the field of view and the associated illumination of imager 3 is projected towards the generally vertical window 16 of the reader, which blocks it from shining on a consumer who might be behind the end of the reader. Imager 6 and its associated illumination is aimed downwards toward the countertop 14 to avoid shining in the operator's eyes.
There is some parallax between each set of illumination LEDs 32 and its associated imager. The direction of the illumination light rays from the LEDs 32 which are mounted on opposite sides of each imager is tilted to converge at a distance from the imager, so that the two illumination beams coincide as much as possible with the field of view of the imager over as much of the working range as possible. Each LED light beam needs to be tilted by only around one degree towards the imager to achieve this. Tilt of the LED light beam can be accomplished by shifting the LED focusing lens slightly closer to the imager than the LEDs are.
Operators of bi-optical readers need them to be very reliable. The solid-state nature of the imagers inherently improve reliability as compared to a laser-based reader, but provision for easy serviceability is still important, to minimize downtime in the unlikely event of a failure. The preferred embodiment therefore combines some, if not all, of the imagers onto the single circuit board 54. The illuminators are also mounted on the same board 54. The controller 44 is also mounted on the same board 54.
The rest of the reader consists only of mirrors supported inside a sealed enclosure, to keep them clean of dust, dirt, moisture and like contaminants. Any repairs will therefore simply require a change of the circuit board 54, which can be removable after a gasketed access panel on the bottom of the reader is removed. The sealed enclosure for the folding mirrors is placed above the circuit board 54 and is likewise easily interchangeable with another for field maintenance.
Interface and power supply connectors, not shown, will be mounted on the same circuit board 54 as at least some of the imagers, and will be accessible through openings in the housing.
The preferred embodiment shown is for a six-sided reader. Six-sided reading is most commonly used in supermarkets. Department stores and mass merchandisers, however, often use bi-optical readers, but do not need a six-sided scanning capability. A less expensive imaging bi-optical reader can be created for department stores and mass merchandisers by eliminating one of more imagers. For example, elimination of imagers 3 and 6 will still provide performance adequate for the needs of many department stores.
A further feature is that the depth of the reader below the countertop 14 does not exceed 100 mm and satisfies regulated requirements in many European countries.
It will be understood that each of the elements described above, or two or more together, also may find a useful application in other types of constructions differing from the types described above.
While the invention has been illustrated and described as embodied in a point-of transaction workstation for electro-optically reading indicia by using plural imagers, it is not intended to be limited to the details shown, since various modifications and structural changes may be made without departing in any way from the spirit of the present invention.
Without further analysis, the foregoing will so fully reveal the gist of the present invention that others can, by applying current knowledge, readily adapt it for various applications without omitting features that, from the standpoint of prior art, fairly constitute essential characteristics of the generic or specific aspects of this invention and, therefore, such adaptations should and are intended to be comprehended within the meaning and range of equivalence of the following claims.
What is claimed as new and desired to be protected by Letters Patent is set forth in the appended claims.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US4613895||Nov 13, 1978||Sep 23, 1986||Eastman Kodak Company||Color responsive imaging device employing wavelength dependent semiconductor optical absorption|
|US4794239||Oct 13, 1987||Dec 27, 1988||Intermec Corporation||Multitrack bar code and associated decoding method|
|US5059779||Apr 13, 1990||Oct 22, 1991||Symbol Technologies, Inc.||Scan pattern generators for bar code symbol readers|
|US5124539||Jun 16, 1989||Jun 23, 1992||Symbol Technologies, Inc.||Scan pattern generators for bar code symbol readers|
|US5200599||Jul 14, 1992||Apr 6, 1993||Symbol Technologies, Inc||Symbol readers with changeable scan direction|
|US5304786||Jan 5, 1990||Apr 19, 1994||Symbol Technologies, Inc.||High density two-dimensional bar code symbol|
|US5559562||Nov 1, 1994||Sep 24, 1996||Ferster; William||MPEG editor method and apparatus|
|US5703349||Dec 20, 1995||Dec 30, 1997||Metanetics Corporation||Portable data collection device with two dimensional imaging assembly|
|US5705802 *||Nov 7, 1995||Jan 6, 1998||Spectra-Physics Scanning Systems, Inc.||Multiple plane scanning system for data reading applications|
|US5717195||Mar 29, 1996||Feb 10, 1998||Metanetics Corporation||Imaging based slot dataform reader|
|US5936218 *||Dec 13, 1996||Aug 10, 1999||Fujitsu Limited||Multiple plane bar code reader for reading optically encoded data|
|US6141062||Jun 1, 1998||Oct 31, 2000||Ati Technologies, Inc.||Method and apparatus for combining video streams|
|US6538243 *||Jan 4, 2000||Mar 25, 2003||Hewlett-Packard Company||Contact image sensor with light guide having least reflectivity near a light source|
|US6899272 *||Jan 8, 2001||May 31, 2005||Symbol Technologies, Inc||Bioptics bar code reader|
|US6924807||Mar 23, 2001||Aug 2, 2005||Sony Computer Entertainment Inc.||Image processing apparatus and method|
|US6951304 *||Aug 23, 2002||Oct 4, 2005||Metrologic Instruments, Inc.||Polygon-based bioptical pos scanning system employing dual independent optics platforms disposed beneath horizontal and vertical scanning windows|
|US7076097||May 23, 2001||Jul 11, 2006||Sony Corporation||Image processing apparatus and method, communication apparatus, communication system and method, and recorded medium|
|US7116353||Mar 14, 2001||Oct 3, 2006||Esco Corporation||Digital video recording system|
|US7191947||Nov 1, 2005||Mar 20, 2007||Symbol Technologies, Inc.||Point-of-transaction workstation for electro-optical reading one-dimensional indicia, including image capture of two-dimensional targets|
|US7280124||Aug 1, 2005||Oct 9, 2007||Magna Donnelly Gmbh & Co. Kg||Vehicle with image processing system and method for operating an image processing system|
|US7430682||Sep 30, 2005||Sep 30, 2008||Symbol Technologies, Inc.||Processing image data from multiple sources|
|US20030029915||Jun 15, 2001||Feb 13, 2003||Edward Barkan||Omnidirectional linear sensor-based code reading engines|
|US20040146211||Jan 29, 2003||Jul 29, 2004||Knapp Verna E.||Encoder and method for encoding|
|US20040189472 *||Apr 14, 2004||Sep 30, 2004||Psc Scanning, Inc.||Combined data reader and electronic article surveillance (EAS) system|
|US20050259746||Jun 4, 2004||Nov 24, 2005||Texas Instruments Incorporated||Clocked output of multiple data streams from a common data port|
|US20060022051 *||Jul 29, 2004||Feb 2, 2006||Patel Mehul M||Point-of-transaction workstation for electro-optically reading one-dimensional and two-dimensional indicia by image capture|
|US20070079029||Sep 30, 2005||Apr 5, 2007||Symbol Technologies, Inc.||Processing image data from multiple sources|
|WO2009006419A1||Jun 30, 2008||Jan 8, 2009||Symbol Technologies, Inc.||Imaging reader with plural solid-state imagers for electro-optically reading indicia|
|1||International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jan. 14, 2010 in related case PCT/US2008/068810.|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US8261990 *||Dec 23, 2009||Sep 11, 2012||Datalogic ADC, Inc.||Data reader having compact arrangement for acquisition of multiple views of an object|
|US8322621||Dec 23, 2009||Dec 4, 2012||Datalogic ADC, Inc.||Image-based code reader for acquisition of multiple views of an object and methods for employing same|
|US8353457||Feb 12, 2009||Jan 15, 2013||Datalogic ADC, Inc.||Systems and methods for forming a composite image of multiple portions of an object from multiple perspectives|
|US8356749 *||May 5, 2010||Jan 22, 2013||Datalogic ADC, Inc.||Imaging scanner-scale with low vertical profile|
|US8366006 *||Dec 22, 2010||Feb 5, 2013||Ncr Corporation||Combined laser and imaging scanner|
|US8387882||Jul 7, 2011||Mar 5, 2013||Metrologic Instruments, Inc.||Decodable indicia reading terminal with a platter to inhibit light reflection|
|US8430318||Jan 5, 2011||Apr 30, 2013||Datalogic ADC, Inc.||System and method for data reading with low profile arrangement|
|US8488210||Jun 19, 2007||Jul 16, 2013||Datalogic ADC, Inc.||Imaging scanner with multiple image fields|
|US8608076||Dec 23, 2009||Dec 17, 2013||Datalogic ADC, Inc.||Monolithic mirror structure for use in a multi-perspective optical code reader|
|US8608077 *||Nov 30, 2012||Dec 17, 2013||Datalogic ADC, Inc.||Image-based code reader for acquisition of multiple views of an object and methods for employing same|
|US8662397 *||Sep 27, 2007||Mar 4, 2014||Symbol Technologies, Inc.||Multiple camera imaging-based bar code reader|
|US8678287||Dec 23, 2009||Mar 25, 2014||Datalogic ADC, Inc.||Two-plane optical code reader for acquisition of multiple views of an object|
|US8724188||Jul 15, 2013||May 13, 2014||Datalogic ADC, Inc.||Imaging scanner with multiple image fields|
|US8746569||Jan 15, 2013||Jun 10, 2014||Datalogic ADC, Inc.||Systems and methods for forming a composite image of multiple portions of an object from multiple perspectives|
|US8857712||Apr 24, 2012||Oct 14, 2014||Datalogic ADC, Inc.||Modular scanner component mounting system for checkstand|
|US9033236 *||Apr 26, 2011||May 19, 2015||Symbol Technologies, Inc.||Point-of-transaction workstation for and method of imaging indicia over full coverage scan zone occupied by unskewed subfields of view|
|US20070297021 *||Jun 19, 2007||Dec 27, 2007||Datalogic Scanning, Inc.||Imaging scanner with multiple image fields|
|US20090084854 *||Sep 27, 2007||Apr 2, 2009||Symbol Technologies, Inc.||Multiple Camera Imaging-Based Bar Code Reader|
|US20090127341 *||Nov 19, 2007||May 21, 2009||Xiangyang Feng||Bar-code reading tool|
|US20090206161 *||Feb 12, 2009||Aug 20, 2009||Datalogic Scanning, Inc.||Systems and methods for forming a composite image of multiple portions of an object from multiple perspectives|
|US20100001075 *||Jul 7, 2008||Jan 7, 2010||Symbol Technologies, Inc.||Multi-imaging scanner for reading images|
|US20100163622 *||Dec 23, 2009||Jul 1, 2010||Datalogic Scanning, Inc.||Monolithic mirror structure for use in a multi-perspective optical code reader|
|US20100163626 *||Dec 23, 2009||Jul 1, 2010||Datalogic Scanning, Inc.||Data reader having compact arrangement for acquisition of multiple views of an object|
|US20100163627 *||Dec 23, 2009||Jul 1, 2010||Datalogic Scanning, Inc.||Image-based code reader for acquisition of multiple views of an object and methods for employing same|
|US20100163628 *||Dec 23, 2009||Jul 1, 2010||Datalogic Scanning, Inc.||Two-plane optical code reader for acquisition of multiple views an object|
|US20100282850 *||May 5, 2010||Nov 11, 2010||Datalogic Scanning, Inc.||Imaging scanner-scale with low vertical profile|
|US20110168780 *||Jan 5, 2011||Jul 14, 2011||Datalogic Scanning, Inc.||System and method for data reading with low profile arrangement|
|US20120160910 *||Dec 22, 2010||Jun 28, 2012||Hammer Steven J||Combined laser and imaging scanner|
|US20120273572 *||Apr 26, 2011||Nov 1, 2012||Symbol Technologies, Inc.||Point-of-transaction workstation for and method of imaging indicia over full coverage scan zone occupied by unskewed subfields of view|
|US20130068839 *||Sep 21, 2011||Mar 21, 2013||Symbol Technologies, Inc.||Method of and apparatus for imaging targets by utilizing multiple imaging modules with on-board local microprocessors|
|WO2013188289A2 *||Jun 10, 2013||Dec 19, 2013||Datalogic ADC, Inc.||Dynamic imager switching|
|WO2013188289A3 *||Jun 10, 2013||Mar 13, 2014||Datalogic ADC, Inc.||Dynamic imager switching|
|U.S. Classification||235/462.32, 235/462.14, 235/462.43, 235/462.41, 235/462.37, 235/439|
|International Classification||G06K7/10, G02B5/00|
|Cooperative Classification||G06K7/10722, G06K7/10801|
|European Classification||G06K7/10S4D, G06K7/10S8B|
|Jun 28, 2007||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: SYMBOL TECHNOLOGIES, INC., NEW YORK
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:BARKAN, EDWARD;DRZYMALA, MARK;VINOGRADOV, IGOR;REEL/FRAME:019552/0952;SIGNING DATES FROM 20070625 TO 20070626
Owner name: SYMBOL TECHNOLOGIES, INC., NEW YORK
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:BARKAN, EDWARD;DRZYMALA, MARK;VINOGRADOV, IGOR;SIGNING DATES FROM 20070625 TO 20070626;REEL/FRAME:019552/0952
|Jan 28, 2014||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|Oct 31, 2014||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC. AS THE COLLATE
Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNORS:ZIH CORP.;LASER BAND, LLC;ZEBRA ENTERPRISE SOLUTIONS CORP.;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:034114/0270
Effective date: 20141027
|Jul 8, 2015||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: SYMBOL TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, NEW YORK
Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:SYMBOL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.;REEL/FRAME:036083/0640
Effective date: 20150410
|Aug 17, 2015||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: SYMBOL TECHNOLOGIES, INC., NEW YORK
Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC.;REEL/FRAME:036371/0738
Effective date: 20150721