|Publication number||US7834636 B2|
|Application number||US 11/923,365|
|Publication date||Nov 16, 2010|
|Filing date||Oct 24, 2007|
|Priority date||Nov 2, 2006|
|Also published as||US7973535, US20080106268, US20110032646, WO2008057925A2, WO2008057925A3|
|Publication number||11923365, 923365, US 7834636 B2, US 7834636B2, US-B2-7834636, US7834636 B2, US7834636B2|
|Inventors||Artur J. Lewinski, Ross Teggatz, Thomas Edward Cosby|
|Original Assignee||Texas Instruments Incorporated|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (13), Non-Patent Citations (15), Referenced by (8), Classifications (10), Legal Events (2)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
This application claims the benefit of U.S. provisional application Ser. No. 60/864,068 filed Nov. 2, 2006, U.S. provisional application Ser. No. 60/864,056 filed Nov. 2, 2006, and U.S. provisional application Ser. No. 60/864,058 filed Nov. 2, 2006, all of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
This disclosure relates generally to ground fault interruption and, more particularly, to methods and apparatus to manage ground fault conditions with a single coil.
Electrical power distribution typically includes multiple-conductor wires to transmit electrical energy and facilitate a ground path for safety. A shock hazard exists in the event of an unintended path from the conductor wires or surfaces (such as a chassis of electrical equipment), which carry electric current, and the ground path. The conductors, such as a line conductor (also referred to as “hot”) and a neutral, or common, conductor, may leak electrical current to each other, to ground, and/or to a person or object as an intermediate path to ground. As such, a person in the intermediate path may receive a lethal electrical shock.
Ground fault circuit interrupters (GFCIs) may minimize and/or eliminate the risk of electrical shock by monitoring an imbalance of electrical current between the hot and neutral lines. Generally speaking, a line-to-ground fault may be detected by way of a coil (e.g., a toroidal Hall-effect coil) around the line and neutral conductors that provide electrical energy to a load. Under non-fault operating conditions, the magnetic fields that result from current in the hot conductor cancel with the magnetic fields that result from an opposite current flow in the neutral conductor, thereby failing to induce a corresponding electrical current in the coil. However, if current from the line conductor leaks current to ground, then the neutral conductor current, and its corresponding magnetic field, will be less than the magnetic field of the line conductor, thereby affecting the coil to produce a corresponding electrical signal indicating a fault. The electrical coil signal, such as a current value, may be compared to a threshold which, when exceeded, causes the GFCI to force a mechanical break to the load via, for example, a circuit interrupter. The circuit interrupter may be employed as a double pole, single throw switch that, when activated, physically separates the line and the neutral conductors from the load.
Detecting a neutral-to-ground fault poses additional challenges because, in part, the neutral conductor is also grounded at the source. Such double grounding of the neutral conductor could create a situation where a portion of the fault current from the line conductor returns to the source through the neutral conductor. As a consequence, the traditional single coil approach will not detect a flux imbalance representative of the actual current leakage magnitude. To aid in neutral-to-ground fault detection, a second coil is typically employed that, when coupled to the first coil, produces a positive feedback loop. Despite the lower detected current imbalances observed during a neutral-to-ground fault, which may not exceed a tripping threshold, the coupled coils will develop an oscillation that, when detected, may be used to indicate a circuit trip or interruption is warranted. Additionally or alternatively, a signal may be injected on the second coil so that, in the event of a neutral to ground fault, the injected signal is induced in the neutral line and is detected by the first coil.
As shown in
In the event of a neutral to ground fault, the first sense coil 112 may not sense any current imbalance, thus fail to trip the solenoid relay contact(s) 110. To detect a neutral to ground fault (RNG), a second coil 120 is employed having a secondary coil winding 122 to which the ground fault detector circuit 116 applies an oscillation signal. During non-fault operating conditions, the signal is not induced into the conductors because there is no impedance imbalance between the line conductor 102 and the neutral conductor 104 (no path between neutral and ground). However, in the event of a ground to neutral fault, the applied oscillation signal from the second coil 120 will propagate to the neutral-to-ground path and is then sensed by the first sense coil 112. When the corresponding oscillation signal is detected by the first sense coil 112, and processed by the ground fault detector circuit 116, the switching device may cause the relay contact 110 to break electrical contact.
The GFCI 100 also includes a test switch 124 and fault resistor RF to allow an end user (e.g., a homeowner) to verify that the GFCI 100 is working properly. When the test switch 124 is activated, current from the line conductor 102 passes through the first sense coil 112 in a first direction, but is diverted through RF and the test switch 124 to the neutral conductor 104. As a result, the returning current (in a second/opposite direction) on the neutral conductor 104 as it passes through the first sense coil 112 is less than the current on the line conductor 102 when it passes through the first sense coil 112, which causes a detected current imbalance between the line conductor 102 and the neutral conductor 104. However, a manual test process with the test switch 124 may not be a regular practice of the end user, which may mean that the end user is not protected in the event of a fault that may have occurred in between manual tests, if any.
The GFCI 100 also includes a saturation capacitor (CS ) for the first sense coil 112 and the second coil 120 to, in part, prevent and/or minimize saturation of one or more voltage-to-current amplifiers that are connected to the coils. For example, an amplifier and/or a voltage-to-current amplifier/converter typically has a very low input impedance when configured with negative feedback. The secondary sense coil winding 114 behaves as an inductor and operates similar to a short circuit at low frequencies. Such operation creates a very high gain configuration, thus small direct current (DC) offsets that are typically present in operational amplifiers (OPAMPS) and/or similar devices may saturate the output. The output saturation may be eliminated with CS, which operates as a DC block yet allows AC signals to pass therethrough. Capacitors must typically have relatively large values to both block DC and pass household line frequency signals (e.g., 50 Hz, 60 Hz), which correspond to added manufacturing costs for the GFCI 100. Additionally, added cost results from having multiple coils within the GFCI 100.
The various methods and apparatus described herein may facilitate ground fault detection without a second coil, thereby eliminating an additional potential point of failure and enabling a cost savings opportunity that may be passed on to end users. Furthermore, the methods and apparatus described herein may facilitate sense coil operation with a smaller capacitor, thereby saving additional costs related to manufacture of the ground fault detection device. While self test techniques may still be performed by the end user, the apparatus and methods described herein may facilitate automatic self testing on a periodic and/or continuous basis to allow identification of unsafe conditions before an end user is exposed to potential danger due to, for example, failure of one or more parts of a ground fault detection device to operate correctly. Some or all of the methods and apparatus described above may be used with one another.
The sense coil 204 includes a secondary winding (L1), which is connected in parallel with a capacitor (C1) and an active inductor (L2) that is simulated by voltage to current converters GM2, GM3, and a capacitor C2. Persons having ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the voltage to current converters GM2, GM3, and the capacitor C2 may be referred to as a virtual inductor 214. The value of L2 is designed to be much smaller than L1, thus the overall inductance value of the parallel combination of L2 and L1 has a value of, for all practical purposes, L2. The parallel combination of the inductors (L1 and L2) and C1 form a resonance circuit, such as an LC tank that is also in parallel with a negative resistance (formed by transconductance GM1 in positive feedback) 212, which operates as a driving source to generate oscillations. The amplitude of oscillations may be limited with a limiter 215, as shown in
A saturation capacitor CS is shown in series with L1 to minimize and/or eliminate amplifier saturation during DC conditions. However, CS may be reduced as a cost savings initiative while preserving saturation prevention, as described in further detail below. Persons having ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that voltage-to-current converters may be rated by a transconductance value gM. The transconductance is a ratio of the output current and an input voltage. Additionally, negative resistors may be implemented by, for example, one or more voltage-to-current amplifiers. A low pass filter 216 and neutral-to-ground (NG) detector 218 are connected to the output of the virtual inductor 214, and a switch driver 220 is connected to the NG detector 218 and a line-to-ground (LG) detector 222, discussed in further detail below. The example switch driver 220 may include a gate driver control for solid state switching devices such as, for example, bi-polar junction transistors (BJTs), metal oxide field effect transistors (MOSFETs), silicon controlled rectifiers (SCRs), etc.
If no fault condition is present (i.e., an NG and/or an LG fault), then L1, C1, −R1 (or GM1), and the virtual inductor 216 operate as a non-fault equivalent circuit 302 shown in
The equivalent circuit of
The NG detector 218 may be implemented in one or more ways including, but not limited to, a full wave rectifier connected to a comparator, a digital filter, etc. However, the resonance frequency component at node V1 is blocked by the low pass filter 216 so that, under non-fault conditions, node V1 includes a resonance frequency component while node V2 does not include the resonance frequency component, as shown in
If a neutral-to-ground (NG) fault is present, then the example GFDC 202 may be electrically represented by a neutral-to-ground (NG) equivalent circuit 402 shown in
R 2 =n 2 *R G (Equation 3)
In the example Equation 3, n is the number of turns of the coil L1, and RG is the NG resistance. When R2 is less than the negative resistance R1, the overall resistive value becomes positive and there is no longer a condition for oscillation and the resonance frequency component is lost. As a result, the NG detector 218 will not detect oscillations at node V1, as shown in
If a line-to-ground fault (LG) is present, then the example GFDC 202 may be electrically represented by an LG equivalent circuit 502 as shown in
If both an NG fault and an LG fault are simultaneously present, the example GFDC 202 may detect such a condition and signal the switch driver 220, when appropriate. In the illustrated example node output of
Further, although the example processes of
The example process 700 of
Even if the NG detector 218 detects a signal at node V1 (block 702), and the signal is within acceptable threshold limits (block 706), the LG detector 222 may monitor for a signal after the low pass filter 216 at node V2 (block 708). As described above, the example low pass filter 216 attenuates the oscillation frequency component caused by the parallel combination of L1, C1, −R1, and the inductor L2 (e.g., the virtual inductor 214). In the absence of the oscillation frequency, the LG detector 222 may determine whether a relatively lower frequency is present, such as a frequency at or near the source of a household power line (e.g., 50 Hz, 60 Hz, etc.) (block 710). Without limitation, the example LG detector 222 may determine whether the output signal from the low pass filter 216 is within appropriate thresholds (e.g., magnitude, duration, etc.) (block 710). If not, the LG detector 222 signals the gate driver 220 to trip so that the example GFDC 202 stops providing electrical energy to the load (block 712). However, if the LG detector 222 determines that the signal properties are within the established limits (block 710), then no fault has occurred and the example process 700 continues to monitor nodes V1 and V2 for both NG and LG faults.
The sense coil 804 includes a secondary winding L1 that is connected to an oscillator S1, and a current-to-voltage amplifier 810 via a saturation capacitor CS to prevent and/or minimize amplifier saturation during DC conditions. However, the example GFDC 802 of
If there are no faults (either LG and/or NG), then a corresponding non-fault equivalent circuit 850 results, as shown in
In example Equation 4 above, the value VOSC represents the voltage of oscillator S1, L1 is the magnetization inductance of the sense coil 804, and f is the applied frequency of the oscillator S1. Absent any fault condition, the NG detector 814 may determine that the current is within one or more appropriate thresholds. However, in the event of a NG fault, a corresponding NG fault equivalent circuit 852 results, as shown in
R 2 =n 2 *R G (Equation 5)
As a result, the current detected by the current to voltage amplifier 810 is mathematically represented in example Equation 6.
The example NG detector 814 may determine that, as a result of the added resistance RG in parallel with the inductor L1, the amplitude of the signal increases and one or more thresholds have been exceeded, thereby indicating a fault condition. One or more signals may be sent by the NG detector 814 to the driver 818 to activate one or more safety devices, such as a relay to break the line-conductor 806 and/or neutral conductor 808 from an electrical source.
In the event of an LG fault, an LG fault equivalent circuit 854 results, as shown in
As described above in connection with
The first transconductor architecture sub circuit 904 includes a voltage-to-current converter GM1 (having a corresponding transconductance gM) having a positive input 912 to which a sense coil 914 is connected. A line conductor 916 and a neutral conductor 918 pass through the sense coil 914 to monitor for, in part, current imbalances therebetween. However, the sense coil 914 in the illustrated example of
In operation, the voltage-to-current converter GM1 current output node 920 is connected to a positive input node 922 of voltage-to-current converter GM2, in which both of the voltage-to-current converters (GM1 and GM2) are within the first transconductor architecture sub circuit 904. Additionally, the second transconductor architecture sub circuit 906 includes a voltage-to-current converter GM3 having a positive input node 924, which is electrically connected to the current output node 920 of GM1. Much like the first transconductor architecture sub circuit 904, the second transconductor architecture sub circuit 906 includes a second voltage-to-current converter (GM4) having a positive input node 926 and a current input node 928. However, rather than incorporate a saturation capacitor CS, as is shown in
Each of the voltage-to-current converters GM1, GM2, GM3, and GM4 have corresponding transconductance values of gM1, gM2, gM3, and gM4. The effect of the first and second transconductor architecture sub circuits 904 and 906 results in an equivalent saturation capacitance value as shown by Equation 7. Therefore, C3 may be much smaller than CS.
The first and second transconductor architecture sub circuits 904 and 906 in conjunction with C3, prevent output saturation of the voltage-to-current converters, and the signal at node 934 that contains the information of the current is fed to the detector 908. Without limitation, the example detector 908 of
As described above in connection with
While the test switch 124 allows the GFCI 100 to be operationally tested by simulating a fault condition, such verification of proper GFCI functionality and/or capabilities is dependent upon regular testing by the end user. In the event the end user fails to test the prior art GFCI 100 on a periodic and/or regular basis, one or more fault conditions may arise in between tests. Furthermore, if the GFCI 100 fails to operate correctly due to, for example, a failed sense coil, a failed saturation capacitor CS, etc., then the end user will not be protected in case a fault occurs. In such circumstances, merely having a GFCI present may provide a false sense of security to the end user.
The example ground fault detector device 1000 includes a power diode bank 1010, a fault diode bank 1012, a relay 1014 to break electrical power with the source 1008 in the event of a fault, and a relay coil 1016 that, when energized, causes the relay coil 1016 to open. A switch 1018 is electrically connected to the relay coil 1016, which may be implemented as an SCR or a transistor (e.g., a metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor (MOSFET)). The switch 1018 receives one or more signals from a ground fault detector circuit (GFDC) 1020 based on, for example, fault condition information and/or self-test request(s). In the illustrated example of
The example GFDC 1020 of
Without limitation, the example GFDC 1020 may include one or more additional or alternative modules for other purposes, such as an example zero-cross module 1040. For example, in the event that the switch 1018 is employed as an SCR, then the zero-cross module 1040 may signal the controller 1032 when the voltage phase of the source waveform is at a zero-cross point. Such information may be useful to determine when to turn-on the SCR, or such information may be useful to count how many source power cycles elapse during a suspected fault condition. If more than three power cycles elapse (i.e., 6 zero-cross detections) while, for example, the sense coil 1036 exhibits a current imbalance, then the controller 1032 may signal the switch driver 1024 to energize the switch 1018 via the gate pin 1022.
In operation, the example power diode bank 1010 provides power to the GFDC 1020 via four diodes D1, D2, D3, and D4. The four diodes form a full wave bridge to supply a positive voltage to the GFDC 1020 so that when current flows into diodes D1 and D2 (e.g., during a positive power cycle), no current flows at the hot conductor 1002 and the neutral conductor 1004 passing through the sense coil 1036, thereby preventing any current imbalance that may cause a fault trip. Diode pairs D1 and D2 may form a power tap for one half-phase of a power-line cycle (e.g., a positive ½ phase of a 60 Hz domestic household), and diode pairs D3 and D4 may form another power tap for the second half-phase of the power-line cycle. As shown in
At scheduled and/or periodic times, the example self-test logic module 1028 is invoked (e.g., invoked by the controller 1032) to partially turn-on the MOSFET 1018 via the switch driver 1024 (e.g., a MOSFET gate driver) and the gate pin 1022. As a result, diodes D5 and D6 of the fault diode bank 1012 may conduct during alternate power phases. Diode D5 establishes a first fault tap as a fault diode at a first location prior to the sense coil 1036, and diode D6 establishes a second fault tap as a fault diode at a second location after the sense coil 1036. For example, during a positive power cycle, D6 conducts and current flows from the hot conductor 1002 after passing through the sense coil 1036 as a current source path. The current continues to flow through the relay coil 1016, but because the switch driver 1024 is not fully turned-on, insufficient current passes through the relay coil 1016 to cause the relay 1014 to open. The current continues to flow through the MOSFET 1018 and a fault resistor RF to ground and through D1 to the neutral conductor 1004 as a current bypass path. However, because the current returning to the neutral conductor is located at a point preceding (i.e., the first power tap) the sense coil 1036, a fault is detected. Rather than trip the relay coil 1016, the controller 1032 and/or the gate logic module 1026 may associate the fault with the active test conditions so that the relay coil is not opened unnecessarily.
Similarly, during a negative power cycle, D5 conducts and current flows from the neutral conductor 1004 before passing through the sense coil 1036 as a current source path. The current flows through the relay coil 1016 and, because the switch driver 1024 is not fully turned-on, insufficient current passes through the relay coil 1016 to cause the relay 1014 to open. The negative power cycle current continues to flow through the MOSFET 1018 and the fault resistor RF to ground and through D4 to the line conductor 1002 as a current bypass path. In view of the fact that the current returning to the line conductor 1002 is located at a point after (i.e., a second power tap) the sense coil 1036, a fault is detected. As described above, the relay coil 1016 is not tripped despite sensing this fault because the controller 1032 and/or the gate logic module 1026 expects the fault during the duration of the self-test.
Additionally or alternatively, the example GFDC 1020 may include an operational amplifier (OPAMP) or comparator 1042 to compare a potential of the MOSFET 1018 output against a predetermined setpoint 1044. An output of the OPAMP 1042 may allow the self-test logic module 1028 to adjust how hard or how softly the switch driver 1024 drives (conducts) the MOSFET 1018. As a result, one or more test patterns may be applied to the MOSFET 1018 (or any other type of switch) to, for example, evaluate both real and imaginary components of the switch impedance without unnecessarily engaging the relay coil 1016. Additionally, driving the MOSFET 1018 at one or more alternate levels of conduction may allow regulation and testing of the electromechanical integrity of the relay coil 1016 (e.g., to determine whether the relay coil 1016 opens and/or closes within acceptable electrical specifications, temperature specifications, noise conditions, time-to-close, etc.). Without limitation, one or more switch 1018 tests may include a short circuit test, an inductance test, and/or a response-time test.
If the example ground fault detector device 1000 is not executing a self-test (block 1202), then the voltage-to-current converter 1034 monitors the sense coil 1036 for a current imbalance (block 1204). If no current imbalance is detected by the voltage-to-current converter 1034, then the example GFDC 1020 continues to monitor for fault conditions or initiates a self-test mode (block 1202). However, if a current imbalance is detected (block 1204), then the switch logic module 1026 and/or the filters 1038 determine if one or more thresholds are exceeded (block 1206). For example, power line transients may occur periodically and/or intermittently that result in some current and/or frequency fluctuations detected by the sense coil 1036. As a result of some expected fluctuation (s), the filters 1038 and/or gate logic module 1026 may employ one or more thresholds so that the relay 1014 is not tripped into an open state unnecessarily.
If the one or more signal properties (e.g., an amplitude, a duration, a number of cycles, a frequency, etc.) are not exceeded, then the example process 1200 returns to block 1202 to continue monitoring for fault conditions and self-test mode. In the event that the signal properties are outside one or more limits (e.g., outside one or more threshold(s) of the one or more signal properties) such as, for example, a detected current value exceeding 0.01 mA for more than three power cycles, then the switch logic module 1026 provides a signal to the switch driver 1024 to energize the switch 1018 (block 1208). Thresholds may also include, but are not limited to, a current level that, when detected, cause the relay coil 1014 to open regardless of how many power line cycles elapse during the detected current level.
If a self test mode initiation is invoked by, for example, a predetermined number of zero-cross cycles or an expiration of a timer on the controller 1032 and/or the self-test logic module 1028 (block 1202), then the self-test logic module 1028 provides a signal to the switch driver 1024 to partially turn on the switch 1018 (block 1210). As a result, the switch allows current to flow through the fault diode bank 1012 (i.e., diodes D5 and D6) and the relay coil 1016. As described above, the self-test logic module 1028 may regulate how much the switch 1018 conducts so that current may flow through the relay coil 1016 without opening the relay 1014. Assuming, for example, that diode D6 conducts during the positive ½ power cycle, current flowing through the switch 1018 causes a voltage drop across RF, which continues to the neutral conductor 1004 via D1. The current that conducted through D6 from the hot conductor 1002 passed through the sense coil 1036, however the return current path to the neutral conductor 1004 via D1 bypassed the sense coil 1036, thereby resulting in a simulated fault. If the example ground fault detector device 1000 and/or the GFDC 1020 is working properly, the voltage-to-current converter 1034 will detect this imbalance as a fault (block 1212). To prevent unnecessarily opening the relay 1014 during self-test, the controller 1032 and/or the self-test logic module 1028 may disable the gate drive 1024 when a known self test is executing. However, if the self test is executing and no current fluctuation is detected, then the controller 1032 and/or the self-test logic module 1028 causes the switch 1018 to fully energize so that the relay 1014 opens (block 1208).
A self test initiated by the controller 1032 and/or the self-test logic module 1028 may be limited in duration to minimize instances where the example ground fault detector device 1000 may not be protecting against an actual fault. For example, the controller 1032 and/or the self-test logic module 1028 may employ the zero-cross detector 1040 to monitor for a predetermined number of power line cycles for which the self-test executes. Upon expiration of the predetermined number of power line cycles, the self-test stops executing and fault detection resumes. In the event that an actual fault occurs at a moment that overlaps with the self-test, then actual exposure to potential shock hazard(s) may be minimized and/or avoided by minimizing the duration of the self-test. In other words, if the self test includes a power line threshold limitation of three power cycles, then an end user of the example ground fault detector device 1000 will not be exposed to potential shock conditions for more than approximately 50 milliseconds. Persons having ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the threshold number of power line cycles and/or a threshold time limit may be set and/or adjusted according to other factors including, but not limited to, regulation(s) imposed by Underwriters Laboratories.
The example GFDC 1020 may also determine whether a fault signal was detected by the OPAMP 1042 (block 1214). Failure to sense a fault signal within one or more thresholds established by the setpoint 1044 (block 1216) may be indicative of one or more circuit failures at one or more components of the example ground fault detector device 1000. As a result of not detecting, for example, a voltage at a MOSFET source 1046 during a known self test, the controller 1032 and/or the self-test logic module 1028 may cause the switch to fully energize, thereby causing the relay 1014 to open (block 1208) and/or display a warning/failure light to alert the user. On the other hand, if the OPAMP 1042 detects the fault signal within the established setpoint(s) 1044, the test is deemed a pass (block 1218) and the process 1200 returns to block 1202.
In the illustrated example of
To illustrate, during a positive power cycle diode D4 conducts to provide power to the GFDC 1314. By virtue of diode D4 being located after the sense coil 1316, the current drawn by the GFDC 1314 is sensed by the sense coil 1316, but the return-path current through diode D3 does not pass through the sense coil 1316. As a result, the sense coil 1316 detects a current imbalance (IFAULT) that is equal to the amount of current drawn by the GFDC 1314. Additionally, IFAULT is in sinusoidal phase with the power-line cycle (as a real fault would be), and because that current is in phase with the line voltage, zero crossing information may be utilized for switch triggering (e.g., SCR), if needed. The current drawn by the GFDC 1314, and detected by the sense coil 1316 may be indicative of a quiescent current. In other words, even when the GFDC 1314 is not actively energizing the relay coil 1318 during a fault, one or more components (e.g., operational amplifiers, filters, voltage-to-current converters, transistors, diodes, a purposely implanted load, etc.) draw some current. Similarly, during the negative power cycle, diodes D1 and D2 conduct in a similar manner to supply the example GFDC 1314 with power. Despite the continuous detection of IFAULT, the example GFDC 1314 does not cause the power line relay 1320 to open unless actual (real) fault conditions are also detected, as discussed in further detail below.
Continuous detection of IFAULT may indicate proper operation of the example ground fault detector device 1300 if the value of IFAULT is equal to an expected current draw of the GFDC 1314. In particular, continuous detection of a known IFAULT magnitude indicates that the sense coil 1316 and/or the GFDC 1314 is working properly, thereby providing the user with protection against fault conditions. However, in the event of a fault condition (i.e., a real fault caused by an NG fault and/or an LG fault), such as a current imbalance detected by the sense coil 1316 in excess of a value associated with current draw of the example GFDC 1314, the power line relay 1320 will trip to protect the user from the detected fault condition.
In operation, the self-test detector 1404 determines whether the output value 1402 of the sense coil 1316 includes the expected quiescent current of the GFDC 1314. Such expected quiescent current may be provided to the self-test detector 1404 via a threshold 1410. If the output value 1402 fails to exceed the threshold 1410, then the self-test detector 1404 indicates a fault condition to cause the power line relay 1320 to open. However, if the threshold 1410 value is at least met or exceeded, the self-test detector 1404 does not send a fault signal to cause the power line relay 1320 to open. Additionally, the normal-fault detector 1408 determines whether the output value 1402 includes any current imbalance that exceeds the expected quiescent current of the GFDC 1314. In the event that the output value 1402, after the expected quiescent current signal is subtracted by the subtractor 1406, includes a value in excess of the threshold 1410, then the normal-fault detector 1408 provides a fault condition signal to cause the power line relay 1320 to open.
Self test verification and fault detection may also be employed by way of the example fault separation circuit 1450 shown in
In the event that the self-test detector 1454 determines that the output value 1452 exceeds the first threshold 1460, a fault may still exist. To determine whether a fault exists when the output value 1452 exceeds the first threshold 1460, the normal-fault detector 1458 compares the output value 1452 against a second threshold 1462. The output value 1452 is a sum of both the self-test current imbalance and a real fault current imbalance, both of which are in-phase. As the two currents are in-phase, any real fault detected will result in an output value magnitude increase, which may be compared against the second threshold 1462. For example, if the signal magnitude is between the threshold 1460 and 1462, the operation is safe because the simulated fault is detected, but the magnitude is not high enough to indicate that a real fault is present. An error signal is provided by the example normal-fault detector 1458 if the output value 1452 exceeds the second threshold 1462, thereby causing the power line relay 1320 to open.
In the illustrated example process 1500, the received current signal (IFAULT) is compared with a threshold value associated with an expected quiescent current (block 1504). As described above, the self-test detector 1404 of
To determine whether a real fault exists, the received output value 1402 may be provided to the subtractor 1406, as shown in
Determining that a real fault exists may also be achieved by way of the example normal-fault detector 1458 of
Although certain example methods, apparatus, and articles of manufacture have been described herein, the scope of coverage of this patent is not limited thereto. On the contrary, this patent covers all methods, apparatus and articles of manufacture fairly falling within the scope of the appended claims either literally or under the doctrine of equivalents.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3700967 *||Jan 10, 1972||Oct 24, 1972||Zinsco Electrical Products||Ground fault detector circuit|
|US3848159 *||Jun 18, 1973||Nov 12, 1974||Airpax Electronics||Ground fault detector circuit with feedback to sensor|
|US3973171||May 19, 1975||Aug 3, 1976||General Electric Company||Ground fault circuit interrupting device with grounded neutral detection|
|US4685022||May 10, 1985||Aug 4, 1987||Square D Company||Ground fault circuit interrupter capable of deriving energy from ground fault current in order to achieve circuit interruption in the presence of a reduced supply voltage|
|US4688133||Jan 10, 1985||Aug 18, 1987||Slater Electric Inc.||Electronic detection circuit for a ground fault circuit interrupter|
|US5420740||Sep 15, 1993||May 30, 1995||Eaton Corporation||Ground fault circuit interrupter with immunity to wide band noise|
|US5998936 *||Nov 22, 1993||Dec 7, 1999||Nilssen; Ole K.||Fire-initiation-safe lighting system|
|US6088205||Dec 19, 1997||Jul 11, 2000||Leviton Manufacturing Co., Inc.||Arc fault detector with circuit interrupter|
|US6421214||Mar 3, 2000||Jul 16, 2002||Pass & Seymour, Inc.||Arc fault or ground fault detector with self-test feature|
|US6532139||May 10, 2001||Mar 11, 2003||Human El-Tech, Inc.||Arc fault circuit interrupter and circuit breaker having the same|
|US6751528||Nov 27, 2000||Jun 15, 2004||General Electric Company||Residential circuit arc detection|
|US20050212522||Jun 15, 2004||Sep 29, 2005||Finlay David A Sr||Circuit protection device with timed negative half-cycle self test|
|US20050243485||Apr 18, 2005||Nov 3, 2005||Gershen Bernard J||Leakage current detection interrupter with open neutral detection|
|1||Fairchild Semi, "RV4141A Low Power Ground Fault Interrupter," URL http://fairchildsemi.com, Internet, Jun. 30, 2005, 7 pages.|
|2||GOBALSPEC, "About Current-to-Voltage Converters," URL http://data-acquisition.globalspec.com/LearnMore/Electrical-Electonic.Components/Wires-Cables/Current-to-Voltage.Connectors, Internet, Copyright 1999, 3 pages.|
|3||GOBALSPEC, "About Current-to-Voltage Converters," URL http://data-acquisition.globalspec.com/LearnMore/Electrical—Electonic.Components/Wires—Cables/Current—to—Voltage.Connectors, Internet, Copyright 1999, 3 pages.|
|4||National Semiconductor Corporation, "LM13700 Dual perational Transconductance Amplifiers with Linearizing Diodes and Buffers," Jun. 2004, 26 pages.|
|5||National Semiconductor, "LM1851 Ground Fault Interrupter," Jun. 1992, 8 pages.|
|6||NEMA Ground Fault Personnel Protection Section, "Understanding GFCIs," URL http://ls.nist.gov/standards/Global/upload/gannon.ppt, Internet, Mar. 1999, 42 pages.|
|7||Sam Goldwasser, "G.F.C.I." URL http://www.codecheck.com/gfci-principal.htm, Internet, copyright 1998, 6 pages.|
|8||Sam Goldwasser, "G.F.C.I." URL http://www.codecheck.com/gfci—principal.htm, Internet, copyright 1998, 6 pages.|
|9||Underwriters Laboratories Inc, "Do GFCIs Carry a HP Rating and a Switch Rating?" Oct. 2001, 2 pages.|
|10||Unisonic Technologies Co., Ltd., "UTCLM1851 Linear Integrated Circuit," date unknown, 9 pages, paper received May 7, 2008.|
|11||Wikipedia, "Gyrator," URL http://en.wikipedia,org/wiki/Gyrator, Internet, Jan. 24, 2004, 2 pages.|
|12||Wikipedia, "Lm13700," URL http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lm13700, Internet, Jun. 14, 2006, 1 page.|
|13||Wikipedia, "Negative Resistance," URL http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negetive-resistance, Internet, May 31, 2003, 12 pages.|
|14||Wikipedia, "Transconduclance," URL http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transconductance, Internet, May 5, 2004, 3 pages.|
|15||Wikipedia, "Negative Resistance," URL http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negetive—resistance, Internet, May 31, 2003, 12 pages.|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US8064178 *||Nov 22, 2011||GM Global Technology Operations LLC||Method and apparatus for balancing current through an interrupt device|
|US8183869 *||Sep 23, 2008||May 22, 2012||Leviton Manufacturing Co., Inc.||Circuit interrupter with continuous self-testing feature|
|US8278882 *||Jul 23, 2008||Oct 2, 2012||Panasonic Corporation||Charging monitor|
|US20090323239 *||Jun 26, 2008||Dec 31, 2009||Gm Global Technology Operations, Inc.||Method and apparatus for balancing current through an interrupt device|
|US20100073002 *||Sep 23, 2008||Mar 25, 2010||Leviton Manufacturing Co.||Circuit interrupter with continuous self-testing feature|
|US20100194354 *||Jul 23, 2008||Aug 5, 2010||Panasonic Electric Works Co., Ltd.||Charging monitor|
|US20150309103 *||Apr 25, 2014||Oct 29, 2015||Leviton Manufacturing Company||Ground Fault Detector With Self-Test|
|US20150309105 *||Apr 17, 2015||Oct 29, 2015||Leviton Manufacturing Company||Ground fault detector|
|U.S. Classification||324/509, 361/45|
|Cooperative Classification||H02H1/003, H02H3/162, G01R31/025, H02H3/33|
|European Classification||G01R31/02C2, H02H1/00C3, H02H3/16D|
|Dec 6, 2007||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INCORPORATED, TEXAS
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:LEWINSKI, ARTUR J.;TEGGATZ, ROSS;COSBY, THOMAS EDWARD;REEL/FRAME:020241/0497;SIGNING DATES FROM 20071022 TO 20071023
Owner name: TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INCORPORATED, TEXAS
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:LEWINSKI, ARTUR J.;TEGGATZ, ROSS;COSBY, THOMAS EDWARD;SIGNING DATES FROM 20071022 TO 20071023;REEL/FRAME:020241/0497
|Apr 24, 2014||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4