|Publication number||US7854175 B2|
|Application number||US 12/224,145|
|Publication date||Dec 21, 2010|
|Filing date||Feb 19, 2007|
|Priority date||Feb 20, 2006|
|Also published as||EP1996901A1, EP1996901B1, US20090044634, WO2007095654A1|
|Publication number||12224145, 224145, PCT/2007/88, PCT/AT/2007/000088, PCT/AT/2007/00088, PCT/AT/7/000088, PCT/AT/7/00088, PCT/AT2007/000088, PCT/AT2007/00088, PCT/AT2007000088, PCT/AT200700088, PCT/AT7/000088, PCT/AT7/00088, PCT/AT7000088, PCT/AT700088, US 7854175 B2, US 7854175B2, US-B2-7854175, US7854175 B2, US7854175B2|
|Inventors||Güenter Weilguny, Wasner Wolfgang, Michael Naderhirn|
|Original Assignee||Gunytronic Gas Flow Sensoric Systems Gmbh|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (24), Non-Patent Citations (1), Referenced by (3), Classifications (12), Legal Events (5)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
This application relates to an apparatus for measuring fluid flows. It can be used in a particularly advantageous manner for measuring gas flows.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,152,935 (Nissan) describes a device for measuring the mass flow of a fluid through a pipe made of an electrically non-conducting material. An ionized electrical field is introduced into the fluid with the help of a pair of electrodes. The first electrode of this pair is a peak projecting into the center of the fluid flow. High voltage impulses are applied to it. The second electrode of this pair is grounded. With reference to the fluid flow, it is located so as to be flush on the defining wall of the fluid flow on the same height as the first electrode, but at a distance to said first electrode. The fluid flow is comprised slightly downstream by means of a third electrode, which is also grounded. A grid electrode furthermore extends across the cross section of the fluid flow yet slightly further downstream. The time that passes until the ion cloud caused on the ionizing electrode by means of a high voltage impulse drifts through the fluid flow up to the grid electrode and causes a potential change against ground at that location is measured. The grounded electrode fixed between high voltage electrode and grid electrode, which comprises the fluid flow, serves the purpose of avoiding interfering undesired charges and discharges. Important disadvantages of this design are the requirement of an electrically insulating and thus non-metallic pipe, the fact that the measuring time becomes very long in response to slow flows, the fact that oppositely oriented flows can be measured only by an approximated duplication of the already considerable cost input, the fact that pulsating flows at which the amplitude of the motion is smaller than the measuring length cannot be measured at all and the fact that statements relating to the turbulence of the flow cannot be made.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,953,407 (General Motors) proposes an apparatus for measuring the gas flow in the common air supply pipe for an internal combustion engine, which is also based on the principle of the ion transport. To avoid interfering influences caused by the accumulation of polar molecules (H2O) on ions, the surrounding electrical field is kept so low that the thermal separation efficiency again compensates for the accumulation. Two configurations designed mirror-symmetrically with reference to a cross sectional plane of the fluid flow consisting of an acute high voltage electrode, which causes a corona, partial cylinder sleeve-shaped counter electrode and grid-shaped sensor electrode are proposed, a difference signal of which is detected. It is thus also possible to measure in both flow directions. For using the apparatus for measuring the air supplied to the internal combustion engines, it is disadvantageous that an electrically non-conducting pipe is necessary, that the apparatus is relatively long, that it cannot measure fast enough to correctly detect flows, which chronologically change rapidly and that it comes into saturation in response to high flow velocities and thus only supplies highly inaccurate values.
The publication “An ion-drag air mass-flow sensor for automotive applications” by Gerhard W. Malaczynski and Thaddeus Schroeder for the IEEE Conference 1989 points out that it would be highly advantageous to measure the air drawn in internal combustion engines in a cylinder-selective manner, but that this has the problem that the flow velocity in the individual suction pipes for currently known flow measuring devices would be too high. The object would be manageable with a configuration according to afore-described U.S. Pat. No. 4,953,407, if the distance between source electrode and collector electrode is chosen to be sufficiently large in adaptation to the maximal velocity to be measured. The disadvantage of this proposal is that it is oftentimes difficult to accommodate the required pipe lengths, that turbulences of the flow cannot be detected and mainly that the measuring sensitivity in response to low velocities becomes too low in response to the highest occurring velocities.
U.S. Pat. No. 3,242,729 describes the velocity measurement in a duct through which an electrolytic fluid flows. Three electrodes project into the duct at a distance behind one another. A current flow is established between the first two electrodes by means of a low voltage. The voltage is measured between the last electrode and the central electrode at a high measuring resistance. Said voltage provides information relating to the velocity of the fluid. The flow guiding mechanisms in an electrolyte are very different from those in an inherently non-conducting fluid, such as gas flows are in a normal case.
U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,056,003 and 4,167,114 show configurations where at least three grid electrodes, which preferably cover the entire flow cross section, are arranged in flow direction behind one another in a duct at a distance to one another. By means of voltage as compared to the second electrode and supported by radioactivity, a corona discharge is maintained on the first electrode. The electric charge arriving at the third electrode is measured. In addition to the disadvantage of radioactivity, the same disadvantages arise as already described above with reference to U.S. Pat. No. 4,152,935.
A similar principle, which also leads to the same disadvantages is also proposed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,136,564. A charge quantity introduced by means of high voltage is controlled to a constant variable per time. A grid electrode, which extends across the entire duct cross section, is fixed downstream. The charge quantity arriving at that location is measured; it provides information relating to the velocity of the fluid. The voltage required for continuously controlling the introduced charge provides additional information relating to the density of the fluid.
According to U.S. Pat. No. 4,163,389, charge carriers are introduced into the fluid at a first electrode pair by means of a corona discharge. An electric current is guided via the fluid duct via an electrode pair arranged downstream therefrom by means of applying a direct current. A conclusion relating to the flow velocity of the fluid is drawn from the chronological phase shift between a pulsing of the corona discharge and a pulsing of the current caused thereby at the electrode pair connected downstream. The disadvantages in turn are substantially the same as in the afore-mentioned U.S. Pat. No. 4,152,935.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,186,601 also proposes a similar functional principle, which in turn leads to the same disadvantages. Charge carriers are introduced into the fluid at a first electrode pair by means of a corona discharge. Either the voltage at this first electrode pair or at an electrode projecting into the flow downstream is triggered. The chronological course of the arriving signal is measured at an electrode, which is arranged even further downstream. The chronological shift between a shoulder of the trigger signal and a shoulder of the signal course caused thereby are used for drawing a conclusion relating to the velocity of the fluid.
There is an abundance of publications relating to how to measure the air drawn in internal combustion engines by means of hot-wire sensors. According to the underlying measuring principle, a wire around which the fluid flow to be measured flows, the electrical resistance of which is highly dependent on the temperature, is heated beyond the temperature of the gas flow. The cooling by means of the fluid flowing around is a measure for density and velocity of the fluid. Considerable disadvantages of this quite common method are that the same measuring result is generated in response to a negative flow velocity as in response to a positive flow direction, that the measuring time is too slow for rapid controls, that the temperature range in which the sensor can be used is relatively limited and that the sensitivity against destruction caused by the solid particles floating along in the flow is relatively high and that the sensitivity against impacts caused by moisture is also considerable. Such sensors are thus always used only for accumulation intake pipes of internal combustion engines and never for the discharge pipes, which lead to the individual cylinders. There is an abundance of tricky proposals relating to how to correct the falsification of the measuring result by means of fluid flows temporarily flowing back, for example by means of local flow smoothing or by processing additional information relating to the respective operating state of the engine by means of interpolation. DE 196 33 680 B4 is mentioned as an example.
Accordingly, it would be desirable to provide a sensor for the velocity measurement of fluid flows, which is faster and more robust as compared to known sensors and which encompasses a larger temperature application. The sensor may also correctly detect a reversal of the direction of the fluid flow.
According to the system described herein, an emitter electrode provided with a sufficiently high negative or positive voltage projects into or to the fluid flow, respectively, and continuously emits electric charge carriers from its surface into the fluid flow. The required counter electrode, which is arranged so as to be electrically insulated from this emitter electrode, can be the electrically conducting wall of the fluid duct or another electrode arranged in the fluid duct, preferably on its wall, or an electrode arranged outside of the fluid duct, the electrode being preferably embodied as grounding. At least one sensor electrode is fixed to a location preferably located downstream on the fluid flow. The projection of the enveloping surface of said sensor electrode, which is projected into the adjacent cross sectional plane of the fluid flow, is small as compared to the cross sectional area of the fluid flow at that location. The electric current arriving at the sensor electrode is measured. It is a small fraction of the current, which is fed by the emitting electrode. Surprisingly, the portion (fraction) of the current through the sensor electrode relative to the emitted current follows a reproducible, monotonously increasing and approximately linear function of the velocity of the fluid.
Conclusions relating to the fluid velocity can thus be made by means of measuring the current through the sensor electrode and a conclusion relating to the mass flow of the fluid flowing through a cross sectional area per time can be made by additionally considering the parameters pressure, temperature, moisture, gas composition and cross sectional area of the fluid flow.
However, if one assumes constant environment conditions for certain measuring requirements, individual parameters need not be considered to be able to draw a conclusion relating to the mass flow via the sensor current. This can go so far that other measuring parameters need not be considered at all to be able to determine the mass flow of the fluid, e.g., at constant temperatures, pressures, moisture conditions, gas compositions, etc.
If in the region of the fluid flow to be measured, measurements are made on at least two sensor electrodes, which have different measuring characteristic curves in relation to fluid velocity, and if a plurality of measuring characteristic curves is attained for each sensor electrode for different values of parameters of the fluid, such as, e.g., density, moisture, particle content, etc., a self-calibration of the measuring arrangement with respect to the fluid velocity measurement can be carried out during operation with automated data processing means. Those points of states, where the same fluid parameters apply for all of the measuring points—and a ratio to one another known for the respective arrangement—and where the respective measuring values at the sensor electrodes mean the same velocity—and the ratio known for the respective configuration, are selected from the stored plurality of characteristic curves. The different measuring characteristic curves can be attained by means of the different designs and/or arrangements of sensor electrodes (type, design, dimension, distance, position, material, insulation body etc.).
Embodiments of the system described herein are illustrated by means of the drawings, which are briefly described as follows.
For reasons of comprehensibility, the cross sectional area of a wall defining a fluid flow is identified as “duct wall”. It is clarified herewith that this term also applies in the case of such fluid flows, which are not defined by a wall around the entire cross sectional area, which applies, for example, to the fluid flow, which flows at wing of an airplane relative thereto.
In the example illustrated in
The sensor electrode 4 barely projects into the cross sectional area of the duct, in which the fluid 1 flows, but only abuts on the inside of the duct wall 2 on the fluid 1 so as to be flush. In its total area, the sensor electrode 4 is also relatively small. The sensor electrode 4 is arranged isolated from the conducting duct wall 2 by means of an insulating body 4.1, that is embodied as a feedthrough.
The sensor electrode does not necessarily need to abut against the duct wall. With an enclosed duct cross section, it can also project into the center of the cross sectional area; with an open duct cross section, it can also protrude considerably from the duct wall.
The emitting electrode 3 can also be embodied so as to be simple and small, for example as a needle. It carries high voltages during the normal state of operation. It is thus separated from the duct wall 2 by means of a corresponding break-down resistant, insulating body 3.1. It is highly advantageous to embody the emitting electrode 3 at its part, that comes into contact with the fluid 1, with a peak or an edge, which are as acute-angled as possible so that, as compared to a flatter embodiment, the high field strength required for the emission of electrons can be attained somewhat easily. When the peak of the emitting electrode protrudes not far from the conducting duct wall, but is closer to it, the insulating ring between this peak and the duct wall is to be chosen to be correspondingly wide, typically several mm, so that a flashover between emitting electrode and duct wall does not occur. Like the sensor electrode, the emitter electrode may also project into the center of the cross sectional area with an enclosed duct cross section; with an open duct cross section, it may protrude considerably from the duct wall.
In particular for the use of the measuring configuration for determining the amount of air supplied to an combustion engine, it is advantageous to connect the emitting electrode 3 to the negative pole of the high voltage source 5 and not to the positive pole. That is to say, that the measuring result thus represents to an increased extent the amount of air ingested, which is crucial for the combustion.
If one wants to at least approximately mathematically describe the dependency between the sensor current Is on the one hand and the velocity of the fluid 1 on the other hand by means of the described measuring configuration, it can also be envisioned as being caused by a circuit configuration according to
Current experiments have shown that the arrangements yield usable reproducible results and do not, for example, saturate for smaller negative fluid velocities up to 50 m/sec high positive fluid velocities (positive corresponds to the direction of the arrow in
Even though the physical processes in reality run in a considerably more complex manner, the measuring arrangement according to the invention appears to operate similarly to a simple ohmic current divider. Together with the improved robustness, the greater temperature range and the fact that an electrode parts do not need to project into the flow or would have to encompass a greater area, an abundance of previously untapped applications become available.
Due to the fact that the sensor electrode is mostly neutral with reference to its electrical effect on the charge carriers in the fluid flow, a plurality of sensor electrodes can be used in a measuring configuration without problems at different edges of the cross sectional area of the fluid flow and, if intended, also in the midst of the cross sectional area, wherein it is indeed possible to provide only a single common emitter electrode for a plurality of sensor electrodes.
Due to the fact that the measuring arrangement comprising flat components on the surface of the fluid flow is sufficient, the electrodes may be manufactured in a cost-efficient manner as conducting parts on insulation films. The assembly by means of adhering the films to the definition of the fluid flow to be measured thus also becomes simple and cheap. The electrodes of the sensor units may also be inserted into the wall of the fluid duct so as to be flush.
Due to the fact that it is possible to supply many emitter electrodes at the same time with a single voltage supply unit, which is relatively expensive, larger measuring arrangements, which use many emitter and sensor electrodes, thus become very cost-efficient.
If precisely a single emitter electrode and a single sensor electrode are arranged on a duct wall, the velocity component of the fluid flow, which is parallel to the connecting line of these two electrodes, can be measured.
If a plurality of sensor electrodes is arranged on the duct wall around an emitter electrode, a conclusion relating to the magnitude and direction of the entire fluid flow can be drawn from the signals measured on the individual sensor electrodes in that a conclusion relating to the individual velocity vectors, that are directed from the emitter electrode to the respective sensor electrode, can be drawn from the individual signals and a conclusion can be drawn therefrom to the total velocity by means of vector computation. With reference thereto,
It is illustrated in
For three dimensions, this means that the vector of the total velocity can be computed graphically from at least three individual components, which are not parallel to one another in that the vector is formed, which reaches from an assumed common starting point of the three component vectors to the point, where all three planes meet, which in each case extend perpendicularly thereto from an end point of a component vector.
In practice, this geometric context will be illustrated in the form of a mathematical formula and this formula will be automatically computed by means of electronic data processing.
Particularly simple circumstances, of course, come about when the two or three measured individual components are perpendicular to one another, i.e. when the connecting lines between one or more emitter electrodes and the individual sensor electrodes in each case pare perpendicular to one another. The total velocity across an area and in a space, respectively, is then simply the vectorial sum of the individual components.
When a measurement is performed with more than two sensor electrodes in planar fluid flows or with more than three sensor electrodes in spatial fluid flows, the system is then over-determined for the computation of the actual flow direction. If this leads to ambiguous results, this can be interpreted and evaluated as evidence of a malfunction of individual sensor electrodes.
Of course a single sensor electrode is sufficient for the one-dimensional determination of direction. This is suitable, in particular, when due to a slim shape of the duct a forward and backward motion, respectively, in a longitudinal direction is the only possible.
Additionally, the computation according to
A simple possibility to correctly determine the flow direction in two dimensional space is to arrange two or more similar sensor electrodes preferably along an arc of a circle around a common emitter electrode. The sensor electrode, that lies most directly in the direction of the fluid flow from the emitter electrode, provides the strongest signal. In three dimensional space, three or more sensor electrodes would have to be fixed accordingly preferably on the surface of an imaginary spherical shell, in the center of which the emitter electrode is located.
Special flow conditions, such as vibrations and turbulences, may also be detected very well by means of the configuration according to the system described herein.
Vibrations of the fluid flow mean chronologically fast, at least approximately periodic velocity changes at individual locations. They are easily identified by means of the measuring arrangement according to the invention, because said measuring arrangement operates virtually without any delay and thus shows a similarly fluctuating electrical signal on the sensor electrodes in the course of time arranged in the region of vibrations.
A turbulence of the fluid flow means that circulating flows overlap the flow, which is otherwise oriented so as to be substantially downstream, and that the velocities at the individual locations furthermore change rapidly. Turbulences are detected due to “noise”, that is, due to rapid disordered chronological fluctuations of the measuring signal. The “cleaner” (=freer from interference) the measuring signal, the lower the degree of turbulence of the fluid. By means of a chronological averaging, for example in the form of a low-pass filtering of the measuring signal, the noise can be suppressed and a conclusion can be drawn relating to the average flow over a period. The averaging over time, however, leads to a slowdown of the measurement. By means of a configuration of a plurality of sensor electrodes, which are spaced apart from one another in and on a cross sectional area and by means of averaging of their measuring results received at the same time, a conclusion relating to the actual total flow through this cross sectional area can be drawn more rapidly. Even under highly turbulent conditions, it thus becomes possible to more rapidly measure a fluid flow through a cross sectional area than would currently be possible by means of other methods.
In an embodiment, an economically beneficial application of the system described herein is the use of the measuring principle according to the system described herein for the cylinder-selective control of the air supplied to a combustion engine. With a multi-cylinder combustion engine, this means that the measuring configuration can also be installed extra into each suction pipe, which leads precisely to a single cylinder. Due to the fact that the measurement supplies correct results even in response to high velocities, in response to rapid velocity changes and even in response to negative velocities, the supplied amount of air can be detected accurately. Parameters, such as fuel quantity to be injected, injection time and ignition time can thus be correctly set for each cycle of the engine and individually for each cylinder, which makes it possible to better maintain the engine in an optimal operating state. It is advisable not only for this application to use the high voltage source 5, which is the most cost-intensive component of the measuring configuration, for a plurality of measuring arrangements, which can include climate control and climate regulation, respectively.
In this application, it is an advantage of the measuring device according to the system described herein that turbulences generated in the swirl and inlet ducts can be detected well and the effects thereof on the total flow can be faded out by means of sum or difference measuring, if necessary. This characteristic can be very valuable when charging the cylinders of a combustion engine with air, which may be vortexed in a certain manner for the purpose of an optimal filling.
A related economically beneficial application is the measurement of the exhaust gas flow admixed to the intake air in combustion engines comprising an exhaust gas feedback. Due to the pressure, temperature and velocity fluctuations occurring thereby, a conclusion relating to the quantity of the fed-back exhaust gas can currently be made only very indirectly, inaccurately and chronologically averaged. This can be improved considerably by means of the measuring device according to the system described herein. It is sufficiently robust so as not to be destroyed even in response to being arranged in the feedback duct and it is so rapid that it is not only possible to detect average values but also the chronological course of actual values of the flow velocity. In combination with temperature measurements, the actual chronological course of the mass flow can thus be detected very well.
As already indicated further above, the measuring method according to the system described herein can also be used when the fluid to be measured does not flow into a duct comprising a closed cross sectional definition. For example, the local flow at the surface of the exterior shell of an airplane can be measured while the airplane flies. In so doing, a local turbulence can be identified by means of the noise that may occur in the measuring signal or a conclusion can be drawn relating to the actual relative velocity of the airplane in terms of to magnitude as well direction as compared to the ambient air. By means of flow velocity measurement on the upper side and on the lower side of an airplane wing the buoyancy affecting the corresponding surface area may be computed. Due to the more accurate knowledge relating to flow states at the airplane, which can be detected therewith, it is possible to either entirely avoid critical flow states or to at least identify them faster; the control can take place faster and critical states can be approached closer due to the improved detection of the true state.
It goes without saying that the considerations made for an airplane can also be generalized for all aerodynamically circulated surfaces.
If the wall of the fluid duct is made of an electrically insulating material, it goes without saying that it cannot form the counter electrode to the emitting electrode. A separate counter electrode, which is preferably grounded or is connected to ground reference, may then be fixed at the margin of the fluid duct. Surprisingly, however, it has turned out that even with a duct wall consisting of electrically insulating material it is not absolutely necessary to fix a counter electrode directly in or on the cross section of the fluid duct. The counter electrode can also be formed by a ground connection fixed outside of the fluid duct. To avoid uncontrollable electrostatic charges and to attain a more or less well defined electrostatic state, attempts should nonetheless be made to accommodate the counter electrode within a close range of the definition of the fluid duct, at least in a defined manner.
In the practical use, the sensor arrangement will be combined with a data processing device, into which the current and voltage measurement results, respectively, and information relating to pressure and temperature of the fluid to be measured as well as possible further information, which is helpful for the subsequent calibration, are read in. The following is to be stored in the data processing device:
The data processing device can then be programmed to render the following outputs:
It has been determined as rules of thumb for the dimensioning:
Mainly if the high voltage-guiding emitting electrode 3 is flush with the enclosing counter electrode, it may be advantageous not to directly connect this counter electrode with ground, but via an electric resistance. This resistor should be smaller than the measuring resistance RS at the sensor electrode. By means of this resistor, the draining current can be measured well and it could be determined therewith whether—principally undesired—creeping currents are at hand from the emitting electrode 3. An icing of the emitter electrode can be identified therewith, for example. In response to a possible flashover, the current is limited by such a resistance. The resistance should be smaller than the measuring resistance RS, because it thus takes over a greater portion of the power supply in case of a sparkover and thus protects the measuring device.
It is not necessarily required to operate the emitter with a DC voltage and a DC current, respectively. Tests have shown that an operation with alternating voltage and alternating current, respectively, is also possible.
Other embodiments of the invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art from a consideration of the specification or practice of the invention disclosed herein. It is intended that the specification and examples be considered as exemplary only, with the true scope and spirit of the invention being indicated by the following claims.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US2619836||May 13, 1948||Dec 2, 1952||Cook Electric Co||Air-speed indicator|
|US3242729||Jun 17, 1963||Mar 29, 1966||Honeywell Inc||Electrolytic flowmeter|
|US3945251 *||Oct 11, 1974||Mar 23, 1976||Stanford Research Institute||Trichel pulse corona gas velocity instrument|
|US4056003||Nov 24, 1975||Nov 1, 1977||S.C.I. Le Brin||Device for measuring the mass flow or flow rate of a gas|
|US4121456 *||Sep 29, 1977||Oct 24, 1978||Institut National Des Radio-Elements - Nationaal Instituut Voor Radio-Elementen, En Abrege: I.R.E.||Meter for the flow rate or the speed of a gas stream|
|US4136564||Feb 17, 1978||Jan 30, 1979||Nissan Motor Company, Limited||Mass flow rate detector of electrostatic type|
|US4152935||Jan 12, 1978||May 8, 1979||Nissan Motor Company, Limited||Mass flow measuring apparatus|
|US4163389 *||Dec 21, 1977||Aug 7, 1979||Nissan Motor Company, Limited||Method and apparatus for electrical measurement of fluid flow rate|
|US4167114||May 27, 1977||Sep 11, 1979||S.C.I. Le Brin||Device for measuring the mass flow or flow rate of a gas|
|US4186601||Nov 1, 1978||Feb 5, 1980||Nissan Motor Company, Limited||Mass flow measuring apparatus|
|US4272995 *||Jun 4, 1979||Jun 16, 1981||U.S. Philips Corporation||Ionization flow meter|
|US4305301 *||Jan 31, 1980||Dec 15, 1981||Lucas Industries Limited||Measurement of the mass flow of a liquid|
|US4387602 *||Feb 4, 1981||Jun 14, 1983||The Bendix Corporation||Pressure compensated circuit for ion mass airflow sensors|
|US4393719 *||Jul 20, 1981||Jul 19, 1983||United Technologies Corporation||Ionization flowmeter|
|US4409822 *||Sep 29, 1981||Oct 18, 1983||Regie Nationale Des Usines Renault||Ionic pickup for the transit time between an emission area and a receiving area|
|US4441371 *||Mar 15, 1982||Apr 10, 1984||Lucas Industries Limited||Gas flow meters|
|US4448082 *||Sep 29, 1981||May 15, 1984||Regie Nationale Des Usines Renault||Differential type transit-time ionic pickup|
|US4480484||Apr 8, 1982||Nov 6, 1984||Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha||Flow rate detection device|
|US4953407||Aug 8, 1988||Sep 4, 1990||General Motors Corporation||Ion-drag flowmeter|
|US5247836 *||Jan 24, 1992||Sep 28, 1993||Lew Hyok S||Convective electric current flowmeter|
|US7523673 *||May 23, 2007||Apr 28, 2009||The United States Of America As Represented By The United States Department Of Energy||Ionization based multi-directional flow sensor|
|DE2819506A1||May 3, 1978||Nov 16, 1978||Snam Progetti||Vorrichtung zum ermitteln des sedimentierungsbeginns der feststoffphase bei feststoff-fluessigkeitssuspensionen|
|DE19633680A1||Aug 21, 1996||Apr 30, 1997||Bosch Gmbh Robert||Correcting system for measurements of pulsatile flow e.g. of combustion air of internal combustion engine|
|SU1553831A1||Title not available|
|1||Malaczynski, G.W., et al., "An Ion-Drag Air Mass-Flow Sensor for Automotive Applications" IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, IEEE Service Center, vol. 28, No. 2, Mar. 1992, pp. 304-309, XP000291654.|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US8342006 *||Nov 27, 2007||Jan 1, 2013||Commissariat A L'energie Atomique||Method and device for detecting and/or quantifying water leaks|
|US20100064776 *||Nov 27, 2007||Mar 18, 2010||Commissarita A L'energie Atomique||Method and device for detecting and/or quantifying water leaks|
|WO2015013171A1 *||Jul 21, 2014||Jan 29, 2015||Ecogate , Inc||Industrial on-demend exhaust ventilation system with closed-loop regulation of duct air velocities|
|Cooperative Classification||G01F1/7046, G01P5/008, G01F1/86, G01F1/64, G01P13/02|
|European Classification||G01F1/86, G01P5/00H, G01F1/64, G01P13/02, G01F1/704D|
|Mar 19, 2009||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: GUNYTRONIC GAS FLOW SENSORIC SYSTEMS GMBH, AUSTRIA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:WEILGUNY, GUENTER;WASNER, WOLFGANG;NADERHIRN, MICHAEL;REEL/FRAME:022418/0810
Effective date: 20080901
|Feb 26, 2013||DC||Disclaimer filed|
Effective date: 20121219
|Aug 1, 2014||REMI||Maintenance fee reminder mailed|
|Dec 21, 2014||LAPS||Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees|
|Feb 10, 2015||FP||Expired due to failure to pay maintenance fee|
Effective date: 20141221