|Publication number||US7868217 B2|
|Application number||US 11/940,115|
|Publication date||Jan 11, 2011|
|Filing date||Nov 14, 2007|
|Priority date||Nov 14, 2007|
|Also published as||CN101918130A, CN101918130B, EP2217370A2, US8288603, US8563794, US20090124840, US20110190558, US20130066125, WO2009064620A2, WO2009064620A3|
|Publication number||11940115, 940115, US 7868217 B2, US 7868217B2, US-B2-7868217, US7868217 B2, US7868217B2|
|Inventors||Scott H. Brown, Tin-Tack Peter Cheung, Daniel P. Hagewiesche, Baiyi Zhao|
|Original Assignee||Chevron Phillips Chemical Company Lp|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (23), Non-Patent Citations (14), Referenced by (11), Classifications (25), Legal Events (2)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
This application is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/799,987 filed Mar. 12, 2004, published as US 2005/0203328 A1, and entitled “Method of Treating a Catalytic Reactor System Prior to Reactor Servicing,” which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety for all purposes.
The present disclosure generally relates to aromatization of hydrocarbons with an aromatization catalyst. More specifically, the disclosure relates to extending the life of an aromatization catalyst by identifying a rapid deactivation threshold of the catalyst and oxidizing the catalyst prior to reaching the rapid deactivation threshold.
Catalyzed reactions and associated catalytic reactor systems are widely used in a variety of industries. A catalyst typically has a finite performance life, which may include one or more cycles of catalyst activity separated by regeneration cycles. For example, as a catalytic process continues over time, the catalyst activity generally decreases. When the catalyst activity reaches a point at which it no longer efficiently catalyzes the process, the catalyst may be at the end of its life or at the end of one of its cycles of catalyst activity. If the catalyst has one or more cycles of catalyst activity remaining, the catalyst can be regenerated to begin a new cycle of catalyst activity. If no additional cycles are available, the catalyst life is spent, and the spent catalyst typically will need to be replaced with fresh catalyst. Increasing the length of the catalyst cycle and/or increasing the number of cycles may significantly improve the overall economics of the catalyzed process. Consequently, an ongoing need exists for improved methods for extending the life of a catalyst.
Disclosed herein is a method of extending the life of an aromatization catalyst comprising identifying a rapid deactivation threshold (RDT) of the catalyst, and oxidizing the catalyst prior to reaching the RDT.
Also disclosed herein is a method of aromatizing a hydrocarbon comprising identifying a rapid deactivation threshold (RDT) for an aromatization catalyst, and operating an aromatization reactor comprising the catalyst to extend the Time on Stream of the reactor prior to reaching the RDT.
Further disclosed herein is a method of characterizing an aromatization catalyst comprising identifying a rapid deactivation threshold (RDT) of the catalyst.
Further disclosed herein is a method of extending the life of an aromatization catalyst comprising predicting a rapid deactivation threshold (RDT) for an aromatization reactor by employing the catalyst in a reactor system under an accelerated fouling condition to identify a test rapid deactivation threshold (t-RDT), predicting the RDT for the aromatization reactor based upon the t-RDT, and oxidizing the catalyst prior to the predicted RDT to extend the Time on Stream of the aromatization catalyst.
Further disclosed herein is a method of aromatizing a hydrocarbon comprising contacting a hydrocarbon with an aromatization catalyst comprising a crystalline aluminosilicate within a commercial-scale aromatization reactor to produce aromatic hydrocarbons, employing the aromatization catalyst in a test reactor system under an accelerated fouling condition to identify a test rapid deactivation threshold (t-RDT), predicting a rapid deactivation threshold (RDT) for the aromatization catalyst based upon the t-RDT, and oxidizing the catalyst prior to the predicted RDT to extend the Time on Stream of the aromatization catalyst.
The life of a catalyst may be extended by identifying a rapid deactivation threshold (RDT) of the catalyst. The RDT may be identified by locating a point or temperature range on a catalyst fouling curve where the fouling rate of the catalyst becomes non-linear. Upon identifying the RDT, the catalyst is oxidized prior to reaching the RDT. An example of a suitable catalyst includes without limitation an aromatization catalyst comprising a Group VIII metal and one or more halides on an inorganic support. The methods disclosed herein may be employed in a process for aromatizing hydrocarbons to extend the life of an aromatization catalyst. The remainder of the detailed description is directed to aromatization catalysts and processes, with the understanding the methods and techniques described herein may be applied to other catalysts and related processes as will be apparent to those skilled in the art.
A catalyst fouling curve, sometimes referred to as a fouling profile, may be used to identify a RDT of a catalyst. Referring to
Time on Stream (TOS) as used herein refers to the amount of time that the catalyst is in use in a given process, or stated alternatively the time that the catalyst is in contact with reactants under effective process conditions for catalyzing the reaction. The slope of the plotted line represents the fouling rate of the catalyst in degrees Fahrenheit per hour (° F./hr). The fouling curves are further defined by the reaction conditions at which the catalyst was used and the data was gathered.
In an alternative embodiment, a catalyst-fouling curve may be prepared wherein the normalized catalyst activity is plotted as a function of Time on Stream. In such an embodiment, the fouling curve generated would be the inverse shape of fouling curves generated using Tnorm data.
The catalyst-fouling curve may be prepared by plotting data gathered over the life of the catalyst, for example data gathered during the actual, real-time use of a catalyst on an experimental, pilot, or commercial scale. However, gathering such actual use data may take several months depending upon the life of a particular catalyst. Thus, the catalyst-fouling curve may also be prepared by plotting data gathered from using the catalyst under one or more accelerated fouling conditions (AFC). An AFC may be achieved by adjusting one or more reaction conditions to increase the rate at which the catalyst fouls. Examples of AFCs include an elevated reaction pressure, a decrease in hydrogen to hydrocarbon mole ratio, an elevated hydrocarbon flow per unit of catalyst, or any combination thereof. In an embodiment, the catalyst is operated under an AFC in a test reactor system, for example a lab scale reactor system, to identify a test rapid deactivation threshold (referred to herein as t-RDT). The RDT for a commercial scale aromatization reactor may thus be predicted based upon the t-RDT determined under AFCs. In further embodiments, a catalyst in an operating, commercial-scale aromatization reactor is oxidized based on the RDT predicted by a t-RDT, as described in more detail herein. Such oxidation based on the RDT predicted by the t-RDT may extend the Time on Stream of the catalyst in a commercial reactor. Hereinafter, the initial catalyst activity in the AFC test reactor system may be expressed as the “t-SOR” and describe the initial temperature needed in the AFC to achieve target conversion. Furthermore, the initial fouling rate determined in the AFC test reactor system may be designated t-FR while the t-TOS is the run length under AFC or the number of hours the catalyst operated at AFC in the test reactor system before target conversion could no longer be achieved. Thus, the designation of a catalytic property Z, as a t-Z indicates the property was determined in the laboratory reactor system under AFC as opposed to a commercial system.
The RDT may correspond to a specific temperature, referred to as the RDT temperature (TRDT) 110, at which the catalyst transitions from a linear fouling rate to a non-linear fouling rate. Alternatively, the RDT may correspond to a range in temperature, which may be referred to as an RDT temperature transition range, as is shown in
Identifying the RDT may further comprise identifying a minimum amount of halogen required in the catalyst to inhibit catalyst deactivation during aromatization. The temperature employed during any oxidative regeneration of the catalyst may be sustained such that the level of halogen on the catalyst is maintained above the minimum amount. In certain embodiments, catalyst halogen content is based on fluoride content, chloride content, or combinations thereof. In an embodiment, a minimum amount of fluoride present in the catalyst is from about 0.05 to about 0.30 weight percent; alternatively, from about 0.05 to about 0.20 weight percent; or alternatively, from about 0.10 to about 0.15 weight percent.
As noted previously, the catalyst-fouling rate may be dependent upon the underlying reaction conditions. For a same or similar catalyst operated at about the same or similar reaction conditions, the RDT may be used to predict when the catalyst is about to transition from linear to non-linear fouling, and the catalyst may be oxidized prior to such transition.
Given that the non-linear fouling portion 140 may correspond to rapid deactivation of the catalyst, it is beneficial to monitor catalyst performance and to oxidize the catalyst prior to reaching the RDT. For example, the catalyst operating temperature may be monitored and the catalyst may be oxidized when the catalyst reaches an operating temperature about equal to or less than the RDT temperature. Where the RDT temperature is represented by a temperature range, the catalyst may be oxidized when the catalyst reaches an operating temperature less than or within the RDT temperature range. In an embodiment, the catalyst is oxidized when the catalyst reaches an operating temperature that is in a range of from the RDT temperature to about 25 degrees Fahrenheit less than the RDT temperature, alternatively from the RDT temperature to about 20 degrees Fahrenheit less than the RDT temperature; alternatively from the RDT temperature to about 15 degrees Fahrenheit less than the RDT temperature; alternatively from the RDT temperature to about 10 degrees Fahrenheit less than the RDT temperature; or alternatively from the RDT temperature to about 5 degrees Fahrenheit less than the RDT temperature.
In addition to or in lieu of monitoring the catalyst operating temperature, the catalyst Time on Stream may also be monitored and the catalyst may be oxidized when the catalyst reaches a Time on Stream about equal to or less than the RDT time. Where the RDT time is represented by a time range, the catalyst may be regenerated when the catalyst reaches a Time on Stream less than or within the RDT time range. Likewise, other catalyst characteristics or properties such as halogen content may be monitored and the catalyst oxidized prior to reaching a value of such characteristic or property that corresponds to the RDT.
After the first regeneration, the reaction may be restarted at time t1 with the catalyst operating at a second starting temperature TS2. The resultant fouling curve 200 comprises a second activity cycle 220 further comprising a linear portion 225 (2nd cycle), wherein the slope is about constant, i.e., the fouling rate F2 of the catalyst is about constant. The fouling rate F2 may be about equal to or greater than the fouling rate F1, provided however that both F1 and F2 are about constant. Again, the catalyst operating temperature continues to increase until it approaches the RDT temperature (TRDT), at which time the reaction may be stopped and the catalyst may be regenerated a second time, for example by oxidation. The regeneration of the catalytic reactor system provides renewed activity to the catalyst (e.g., a third activity cycle 230) as evinced by a lower third cycle starting catalyst operating temperature, TS3, which is shown by the vertical drop or decreasing step 227 in the graph.
After the second regeneration, the reaction may be restarted at time t2 with the catalyst operating at a third starting temperature, TS3. The resultant fouling curve 200 comprises a third linear portion 235 (3nd cycle), wherein the slope is about constant, i.e., the fouling rate F3 of the catalyst is about constant. The fouling rate F3 may be about equal to or greater than the fouling rate F1 and/or F2, provided however that each of F1, F2, and F3 are about constant. Again, the catalyst operating temperature continues to increase until it approaches the RDT temperature, at which time the reaction may be stopped and the catalyst may be regenerated again. The catalyst may continue to be used and regenerated until the resultant activity cycles are no longer economically efficient. For example, as the starting temperatures (TS1, TS2, TS3, etc.) approach the RDT temperature, the cycle time will continue to decrease until the cycle time is no longer of sufficient duration to warrant continued regeneration cycles based upon the expense of the regeneration and the overall process economics.
When the catalyst is in its final life cycle and will not be regenerated, the reaction is continued and the catalyst operating temperature is allowed to exceed the RDT temperature. The resultant fouling curve comprises a non-linear portion 240, wherein the slope is changing, i.e., the fouling rate F4 of the catalyst is increasing. Non-linear portion 240 represents a period of rapid catalyst deactivation, wherein the operating temperature of the catalyst rapidly increases until the operating temperature reaches a maximum value, Tmax, at which time the reaction is stopped and the catalyst is spent. The total catalyst life of the spent catalyst is represented by the sum of the Times on Stream for all the activity cycles, which is the total operating time from t0 to tmax. The spent catalyst may be replaced with fresh catalyst and the process may be continued.
Without intending to be limited by theory, it is believed that regeneration of the catalyst prior to reaching the RDT provides for additional activity cycles displaying linear behavior (i.e., having a constant fouling rate), thereby increasing the total catalyst life. In an embodiment, a catalyst regenerated prior to reaching the RDT as disclosed herein may have about a 100% increase in total catalyst life, alternatively a 200% increase in total catalyst life, alternatively a 300% increase in total catalyst life. Without intending to be limited by theory, the total catalyst life may be increased by postponing the rapid and more permanent deactivation of the catalyst resulting from post-RDT, non-linear fouling. That is, exceeding the RDT may result in irreparable damage to the catalyst such that overall life is shortened.
As noted previously, in an embodiment the catalyst is an aromatization catalyst employed in an aromatization process. The aromatization catalyst may comprise an inorganic support, a Group VIII metal such as platinum, and one or more halides such as fluorine, chlorine, iodine, bromine, or combinations thereof. The inorganic support may be a crystalline aluminosilicate, a zeolite, a L-zeolite, or combinations thereof. In some embodiments, the zeolite may be a large pore zeolite. In other embodiments, the zeolite may be a L-zeolite, for example a potassium L-type zeolite, which refers to L-type zeolites wherein the principal exchangeable cation incorporated in the zeolite is potassium. Type L zeolite is described in U.S. Pat. No. 3,216,789, which is incorporated herein by reference. The zeolites may be bound with a binding agent such as silica, alumina, clays, titania, magnesium oxide, or combinations thereof. The Group VIII metal and one or more halides may be added to the support by known methods such as incipient wetness or ion exchange impregnation. In an embodiment, the catalyst comprises a silica bound potassium L-type zeolite support, platinum, chloride, and fluoride, such catalyst having an RDT temperature range of from about 950 to about 1000° F. and a Tmax of about 1025° F. The amount of platinum in the catalyst may range from about 0.1 to about 5.0% by weight, alternatively from about 0.3 to about 1.5% by weight. The amount of halide in the catalyst may range from about 0.05 to about 5.0% by weight. An example of a suitable commercially available aromatization catalyst is the Aromax® II catalyst available from Chevron Phillips Chemical Company, LP of The Woodlands, Tex. Suitable aromatization catalysts are also disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,153,801 and 6,812,180, each of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Again, without intending to be limited by theory, the deactivation mechanism for an aromatization catalyst comprising platinum and one or more halides on an inorganic support may be classified into three main categories: carbonaceous deposits (e.g., coking), platinum sintering, and loss of halides. Without wishing to be limited by theory, it is believed that the initial deactivation in the linear fouling portion of the fouling curve is mainly due to carbonaceous deposition on the catalyst. Consequently, due to the deactivation, the reactor temperature has to be increased in order to maintain a constant product yield. As the yield adjusted temperature exceeds the RDT temperature, platinum sintering and loss of halides, which are irreversible via simple oxidation, start to become prominent in the deactivation mechanism. As a result, the deactivation rate increases and the resultant fouling curve display a non-linear deactivation portion. The increased deactivation caused by platinum sintering and loss of halides in the non-linear portion also facilitates the process of carbonaceous deposition on the catalyst. Since all three of the deactivation mechanisms are present in a significant manner and facilitate each other in the non-linear portion, the deactivation rate is observed to accelerate at an increasing rate at the end of the catalyst life.
Without wishing to be limited by theory, it is further believed that the catalyst deactivation mechanism in the linear portion of the fouling curve is dominated by carbonaceous deposition, while the mechanism in the non-linear portion is dominated by platinum sintering and halide loss. Since regeneration via oxidation can only reverse, or partially reverse, the deactivation caused by carbonaceous deposition, regeneration via controlled oxidation may be carried out in the linear portion of the fouling curve prior to substantial deactivation from irreversible platinum sintering and halide loss. Furthermore, compared to the catalyst in the early linear portion, the amount of carbon formed on the catalyst in the late linear portion is increased. Therefore, regeneration of the catalyst via controlled oxidation may be conducted in the late linear portion, i.e., about equal to the RDT temperature, to achieve the economically optimal result. Regeneration via oxidation at or near the RDT temperature decreases the temperature of the reactor necessary to maintain a constant product yield and repositions the catalytic activity from the end of the linear portion back to an earlier stage of the linear portion, as shown in
Any suitable reactor configuration and associated processing equipment may be used to carry out the aromatization process. In various embodiments, the aromatization process may comprise a fixed bed system, a moving bed system, a fluidized bed system, or combinations thereof. The aromatization process may be batch or continuous. In an embodiment, the aromatization process is a fixed bed system comprising one or more fixed bed reactors in series. The flow of the feed to such a system can be upward, downward, or radial through the reactors. “Reactor” and “aromatization reactor” as used herein refer interchangeably to the reactor vessel, reactor internals, and associated processing equipment, including but not limited to the catalyst, inert packing materials, scallops, flow distributors, center pipes, reactor ports, catalyst transfer and distribution system, furnace means, heat transfer means, and piping. Within the aromatization reactor, a hydrocarbon feed is contacted with an aromatization catalyst under reaction conditions (e.g., temperature, flow, and pressure) suitable for aromatization of one or more components in the feed.
“Aromatization” as used herein refers to reforming, or treatment of a hydrocarbon feed to provide an aromatics enriched product (i.e., a product whose aromatics content is greater than in the feed). Typically, one or more components of the feed undergo one or more reforming reactions to produce aromatics. Some of the hydrocarbon reactions that may occur during the reforming operation include the dehydrogenation of cyclohexanes to aromatics, dehydroisomerization of alkylcyclopentanes to aromatics, and dehydrocyclization of acyclic hydrocarbons to aromatics. A number of other side reactions may also occur, including the dealkylation of alkylbenzenes, isomerization of paraffins, and hydrocracking reactions that produce light gaseous hydrocarbons, e.g., methane, ethane, propane and butane.
In embodiments, the feed to the aromatization reactor comprises any combination of those hydrocarbons having from about five (C5) to about nine carbon atoms (C9). In certain embodiments, the feed comprises a naphtha. Such a naphtha feed may be a light hydrocarbon, with a boiling range of about 70° F. to 450° F. The naphtha feed may contain aliphatic or paraffinic hydrocarbons. These aliphatics are converted, at least in part, to aromatics in the reforming reactor system. In an embodiment, the feed is substantially free of sulfur, nitrogen, metals, and other known catalyst poisons. These catalyst poisons can be removed by first using conventional hydrofining techniques, then using sorbents to remove the remaining sulfur compounds. While catalytic reforming typically refers to the conversion of naphtha, other feedstocks can be treated as well to provide an aromatics enriched product. Therefore, while the conversion of naphtha is one embodiment, the present disclosure can be useful for the conversion or aromatization of a variety of feedstocks such as paraffin hydrocarbons, olefin hydrocarbons, acetylene hydrocarbons, cyclic paraffin hydrocarbons, cyclic olefin hydrocarbons, and mixtures thereof, and particularly saturated hydrocarbons.
Operating ranges for a typical reforming process, such as an aromatization process, include catalyst operating temperatures between 700° F. and 1050° F.; a system pressure between 0 and 400 psig; a recycle hydrogen rate sufficient to yield a hydrogen to hydrocarbon mole ratio for the feed to the reforming reactor zone between 0.1 and 20; and a liquid hourly space velocity for the hydrocarbon feed over the reforming catalyst of between 0.1 and 10. Suitable reforming temperatures are achieved by heating the furnace tubes to high temperatures that can range from 700° F. to 1800° F.
As noted previously, the catalyst may be regenerated at least once via oxidation to remove carbonaceous deposits from the catalyst. The catalyst may be removed from the reactor for regeneration. Alternatively, the catalyst may be regenerated in situ within the reactor. In the following discussion, re-oxidation will focus on an in situ oxidation of the catalyst within a reactor system, with the further understanding that reactor system refers to any suitable reactor configuration, including but not limited to one or more fixed bed, radial flow reactors in series. It should be further understood that where multiple reactors are employed, the reactor system may refer to the reactors individually, to the reactors as a whole, or both, as will be apparent to those skilled in the art. Finally, the oxidation procedure is described in the context of an aromatization catalyst and process, with the understanding that such procedure may be tailored and applied to other catalysts and processes as will be apparent to those skilled in the art.
To begin preparations for oxidation of the catalyst, the aromatization reaction may be stopped by first reducing the catalyst temperature and then cutting the hydrocarbon feed to the reactor system. The temperature and feed rate may be reduced incrementally, first the temperature and then feed, until the temperature is in the range of about 600° F. to about 700° F. prior to cutting the feed entirely.
After the reactor system feed has been shut off, residual hydrocarbons may be purged from the reactor system, such as via a purge gas fed to the reactor system. In embodiments, suitable purge gases may comprise gases that are inert under the conditions in the aromatization reactor system. In certain embodiments, suitable purge gases comprise hydrogen, methane, nitrogen, noble gases, or combinations thereof. In an embodiment, a hydrogen recycle stream from within the reactor system is used to purge the reactor system. In some embodiments, the reactor system may or may not be gradually depressured to from about 15 psig to about 45 psig, while maintaining at least about an 80 vol % hydrogen recycle content. The hydrogen recycle may be continued for at least about 4 hours or until the rate of accumulation of liquids in knock-out drums downstream of the reactor(s) drops to below about 5 gallons/hour. Alternatively, the hydrogen recycle/purge may be continued until the accumulation rate is less than about 1 gallon/hour.
Additional steps that may further isolate and purge the reactor system comprise draining low points in the system, employing plant blinds to isolate the system, or in some embodiments, a second purge may be carried out. Suitable gases for a second purge include nitrogen, noble gases, or combinations thereof. In an embodiment, following an initial hydrogen purge of the reactor system or a second purge, condensable hydrocarbons in the reactor system may be further reduced by pressurizing the system to about 15 psig using nitrogen. Purging of the reactor system may continue until combustibles are reduced to less than 2 percent by weight in the recycle gas. In some embodiments, the nitrogen purge is continued until at least an about 90 vol % nitrogen atmosphere in the reactor system is attained.
After purging, oxygen may be fed to the reactor system under suitable reaction conditions such that carbonaceous deposits on the aromatization catalyst are oxidized and thereby removed. The oxygen may be fed to the reactor system via one or more streams comprising air, diluted air, oxygen, diluted oxygen, or combinations thereof. Where multiple reactors are present in the reactor system, the oxygen may be fed to the first reactor and allowed to pass sequentially through the reactor train and/or may be fed to one or more of the reactors individually or even simultaneously.
Various process parameters may be regulated to control the oxidation reaction such as the amount of oxygen in the feed to the reactor system, the reaction temperature, the reaction pressure, and the oxidation time. In embodiments, the concentration of oxygen maintained in the feed stream to the reactor system is about 0.01 to about 10 vol % oxygen; alternatively, about 0.1 to about 5 vol % oxygen; alternatively, about 0.2 to about 0.8 vol % oxygen. In embodiments where air is used as an oxygen feed, the air may be diluted with nitrogen to provide a feed stream having an air to nitrogen (air:N2) ratio of from about 1:1999 to about 1:1; alternatively, about 1:199 to about 1:3; or alternatively, about 1:99 to about 1:24. The reaction temperature may range from about ambient to about 1000° F.; alternatively, from about 300° F. to about 900° F.; or alternatively, from about 425° F. to about 800° F. The reaction pressure may range from about ambient to about 250 psig; alternatively, from about ambient to about 150 psig; or alternatively, from about ambient to about 50 psig. The oxidation time may range from about 1 to about 48 hours; alternatively from about 4 to about 36 hours; or alternatively, from about 8 to about 24 hours.
During the oxidation, the concentration of water in an output stream from the reactor system may be monitored. Oxidation reaction temperatures, temperature ramp rates, and oxygen levels may be adjusted in order to regulate the level of water in the output stream. In embodiments, a suitable water concentration in the output stream during the oxidation operation is less than about 2000 ppm; alternatively, less than about 1500 ppm; or alternatively, less than about 500 ppm.
There may be a large exotherm in the reactor system from oxidation of carbonaceous deposits as the oxidation runs its course. In embodiments, the exotherm is regulated by reducing air injection, by reducing furnace temperatures, by injecting nitrogen, or combinations thereof. In certain embodiments, the exotherm is maintained at less than about 175° F.; alternatively, less than about 150° F.; or alternatively, less than about 125° F.
Oxygen levels in an output stream from the reactor system, also referred to as oxygen breakthrough, may be indicative of the progress toward completion of the oxidation of the carbonaceous deposits and thus completion of the catalyst regeneration. In the beginning of the oxidation, a greater amount of the oxygen fed to the reactor system is consumed in oxidizing the carbonaceous deposits on the catalyst. As the oxidation proceeds, however, the amount of oxygen consumed in the reactor system decreases as the amount of carbonaceous deposits likewise decrease. Accordingly, as the oxidation proceeds, the amount of oxygen in the output stream from the reactor system may increase. The oxidation may be considered sufficiently complete as the concentration of oxygen in the output stream from the reactor system approaches the oxygen concentration in the feed stream to the reactor system. For example, the oxidation may be considered complete from a practical consideration when the oxygen concentration in the output stream becomes about constant over a period of time, and is about equal to or within an acceptably close tolerance to the oxygen concentration in the feed stream, or both.
Upon an indication that the oxidation is complete, the oxidation process may be stopped by halting the oxygen feed to the reactor system. The reactor system may then undergo further steps to prepare the reactor system for start-up of the aromatization process. For example, the reactor system may be purged and the aromatization catalyst therein may be reduced in a reducing atmosphere. The aromatization process may be started by introducing a hydrocarbon feed to the regenerated aromatization catalyst under suitable reaction conditions for aromatization of the hydrocarbon feed. Upon startup of the aromatization process, the regenerated catalyst will once again be operating in a linear portion of the fouling curve as described herein.
The method for characterizing and extending the life of an aromatization catalyst by identification of a RDT having been generally described, the following examples are given as a particular embodiment of the method disclosed and to demonstrate a number of the practices and advantages thereof. It is understood that the examples are given as a more detailed demonstration of some aspects of the methods described above, and is not intended to limit the specification or the claims to follow in any manner.
Samples of an aromatization catalyst taken at various on stream times in a commercial run were evaluated in the laboratory by accelerated fouling. The aromatization catalyst was a silica bound potassium L-type zeolite support comprising platinum, chloride, and fluoride. The samples were subjected to accelerated fouling conditions in a lab-scale test unit having a simplified process flow as shown in
Following the accelerated fouling, controlled air oxidation of the fouled catalyst samples were conducted at 900° F. for two hours with an air/N2 ratio of 1:10 to produce a regenerated catalyst. The catalyst was heated in the presence of oxygen under conditions suitable to control exotherms and prevent runaway of the reaction. Such conditions are known to one of ordinary skill in the art.
Catalyst sample 1, which was taken from a first batch of catalyst, Batch A, that had not been run commercially, was fouled under accelerated conditions, and a complete fouling curve is shown in
Catalyst samples 2-5 were obtained from a commercial reactor after having been on-line for 9 months (mid-run), 10 months (mid-run), 13 months (mid-run), and 17 months (end-run), respectively. The percent carbon level for each sample, as determined by elemental analysis using the Carlo Erba elemental analyzer, is reported in Table 1. Catalyst samples 2-5 were fouled under accelerated conditions in a lab-scale test reactor and fouling curves for each are shown in
Carbon levels of commercial aged catalyst samples
Carbon (Wt. %)
Sample 1 (fresh)
Sample 2 (9 months)
Sample 3 (10 months)
Sample 4 (13 months)
Sample 5 (17 months)
AFC reactor test catalyst properties for commercial aged catalyst samples
Samples 6 and 7 were prepared by oxidizing two separate portions of Sample 4 (13-month-old catalyst) at 900° F. for two hours with an air/N2 ratio of 1:10. In order to confirm the oxidation conditions, samples 6 and 7 were oxidized under the same conditions, but in different batches. The oxidized samples 6 and 7 catalyst properties were evaluated respectively in two different lab AFC reactor units, A and B, and the resultant fouling curves are shown in
t-FR (° F./hr)
Sample 4 (13 months)
Sample 6 (13 months)
oxidized at 900° F.; unit A
Sample 7 (13 months)
oxidized at 900° F.; unit B
1These are pre-lab reactor test carbon amounts.
Samples 8 and 9 were obtained by taking portions from sample 4 (i.e., the 13-month-old catalyst) and oxidizing them separately at 700° F. and 800° F., respectively, for two hours with an air/N2 ratio of 1:10 using the same conditions described earlier to control the exotherm. The carbon content of samples 6, 8, and 9 are listed in Table 4. Compared with the oxidation at 900° F., the carbon removal at 800° F. and especially at 700° F. is less effective.
Sample 6 (13 months)
Oxidized at 900° F.
Sample 8 (13 months).
Oxidized at 800° F.
Sample 9 (13 months).
Oxidized at 700° F.
Sample 10 was prepared by oxidizing a portion from sample 3 (i.e., the 10-month-old catalyst) at 900° F. for two hours with an air/N2 ratio of 1:10. Sample 11 was prepared by oxidizing a portion from sample 5 (i.e., the 17-month-old catalyst) at 900° F. for two hours with an air/N2 ratio of 1:10. A portion of each oxidized sample was analyzed for wt % carbon, while another portion of each oxidized sample was evaluated in a lab-scale unit by accelerated fouling. The results are listed in Table 5.
Sample 5 (17 months)
Sample 11 (17 months)
Oxidized at 900° F.
Sample 3 (10 months)
Sample 10 (10 months)
Oxidized at 900° F.
Sample 2 (9 months)
1These are pre-lab reactor test carbon amounts.
The t-SOR temperature of sample 5 (17-month-old catalyst) is 1004° F./hour. Compared to the transition RDT temperature range of from about 980° F. to about 990° F. in the fouling curve of sample 1 (fresh catalyst), sample 5 (17-month-old catalyst) is already in the non-linear regime. After the air oxidation process, the t-SOR temperature of sample 11 decreases by 19° F. However, this t-SOR temperature is barely back down to the RDT and additionally the fouling rate is not improved after the air oxidation. As a result, the total length of the catalyst life (i.e. t-TOS) is not extended greatly, i.e., 159 hours for sample 11 versus 131 hours for sample 5. The failure to reduce fouling rate or significantly extend catalyst life may be explained by the fact that sample 5 was taken at the end of the run and was already in the non-linear portion of the fouling curve prior to the oxidation.
In contrast, the t-SOR temperature of sample 3 (10-month-old catalyst) is 963° F., which is far below the transition t-RDT temperature range (980-990° F.) separating the linear and non-linear portions of the fouling curve. As a result, the controlled air oxidation treatment provides little improvement of the catalytic performance of sample 10 in comparison to sample 3, which may be explained by relatively low carbon build up on the 10-month-old catalyst. Therefore, the restoration of the catalytic properties by carbon removal via oxidation for this catalyst is minor. During the air oxidation the platinum may sinter minimally, which may further offset the gain from air oxidation. Sample 2 (9-month-old catalyst) was on-line an even shorter time than sample 3 (10-month-old catalyst), and thus has a lower t-SOR temperature (953° F.). Therefore, sample 2 was not considered for the air oxidation treatment.
Catalyst sample 12, which was fresh catalyst taken from a second batch of catalyst Batch B, was fouled under accelerated conditions, and a complete fouling curve is shown in
Catalyst sample 13 was taken at the end of a commercial run of the second catalyst batch, Batch B, from Example 6 and was oxidized as described previously to produce sample 14. Catalyst sample 15 was taken from a third catalyst batch, Batch C, after 12 months in a commercial run and was fouled under accelerated fouling conditions. Catalyst sample 16 was obtained by oxidizing a portion of sample 15 under oxidation conditions described previously. The results for samples 12-16 are listed in Table 6. Sample 13, which was taken at the end of the commercial run, is in the non-linear portion of the fouling curve as evinced by a t-SOR of 1004° F. As expected, the air oxidation of the end-of-run catalyst as shown in sample 13 increased the fouling rate and did not extend the catalyst life.
(Fresh second commercial batch)
Sample 13 (end-run)
Sample 14 (end-run)
Oxidized at 900° F.
Sample 15 (12 months)
Sample 16 (12 months)
Oxidized at 900° F.
1These are pre-lab reactor test carbon amounts.
The t-SOR temperature of sample 15 is 985° F., which indicates that sample 15 is in the t-RDT temperature transition range and about to enter the non-linear portion of the fouling curve. Thus, regeneration of this catalyst by air oxidation should be effective, as such is being performed after significant carbonaceous deposits may have formed but prior to the t-RDT threshold. Compared to sample 15, the t-SOR temperature of the oxidized catalyst of sample 16 is decreased by 15° F. and its fouling rate is reduced to half. After the air oxidation, the amount of carbon on the catalyst is reduced by approximately 75%. The fouling curves of the samples 13, 15 and 16 are in the non-linear portion of the fouling curve, as is shown in
Overall, the Examples show that the life of an aromatization catalyst may be extended by controlled air oxidation of the catalysts, and in particular oxidation of the catalysts when they are about to reach the temperature range transitioning from a linear to a non-linear portion of the fouling curve.
While preferred embodiments of the invention have been shown and described, modifications thereof can be made by one skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and teachings of the invention. The embodiments described herein are exemplary only, and are not intended to be limiting. Many variations and modifications of the invention disclosed herein are possible and are within the scope of the invention. Where numerical ranges or limitations are expressly stated, such express ranges or limitations should be understood to include iterative ranges or limitations of like magnitude falling within the expressly stated ranges or limitations (e.g., from about 1 to about 10 includes, 2, 3, 4, etc.; greater than 0.10 includes 0.11, 0.12, 0.13, etc.). Use of the term “optionally” with respect to any element of a claim is intended to mean that the subject element is required, or alternatively, is not required. Both alternatives are intended to be within the scope of the claim. Use of broader terms such as comprises, includes, having, etc. should be understood to provide support for narrower terms such as consisting of, consisting essentially of, comprised substantially of, etc.
Accordingly, the scope of protection is not limited by the description set out above but is only limited by the claims that follow, that scope including all equivalents of the subject matter of the claims. Each and every claim is incorporated into the specification as an embodiment of the present invention. Thus, the claims are a further description and are an addition to the preferred embodiments of the present invention. The discussion of a reference herein is not an admission that it is prior art to the present invention, especially any reference that may have a publication date after the priority date of this application. The disclosures of all patents, patent applications, and publications cited herein are hereby incorporated by reference, to the extent that they provide exemplary, procedural or other details supplementary to those set forth herein.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US2882244||Dec 24, 1953||Apr 14, 1959||Union Carbide Corp||Molecular sieve adsorbents|
|US3130007||May 12, 1961||Apr 21, 1964||Union Carbide Corp||Crystalline zeolite y|
|US3216789||Aug 3, 1962||Nov 9, 1965||Union Carbide Corp||Crystalline zeolite l|
|US4021447||Apr 30, 1975||May 3, 1977||Mobil Oil Corporation||Synthesis of zeolite ZSM-4|
|US4071739||Mar 10, 1977||Jan 31, 1978||Jenn Air Corporation||Convertible radiant convection oven|
|US4503023||Oct 28, 1981||Mar 5, 1985||Union Carbide Corporation||Silicon substituted zeolite compositions and process for preparing same|
|US4539304||Mar 8, 1984||Sep 3, 1985||Chevron Research Company||Pretreatment method for increasing conversion of reforming catalyst|
|US4539305||Mar 8, 1984||Sep 3, 1985||Chevron Research Company||Pretreatment method for enhancing the selectivity and increasing the stability of a reforming catalyst|
|US4937215||Oct 12, 1988||Jun 26, 1990||Research Association For Utilization Of Light Oil||Process for restoring deactivated catalysts|
|US5073529||Dec 20, 1989||Dec 17, 1991||Amoco Corporation||Method of regenerating a nonacidic zeolite catalyst|
|US5155075||Mar 1, 1991||Oct 13, 1992||Chevron Research And Technology Company||Low temperature regeneration of coke deactivated reforming catalysts|
|US5723707||Dec 12, 1994||Mar 3, 1998||Chevron Chemical Company||Dehydrogenation processes, equipment and catalyst loads therefor|
|US5863418||Feb 9, 1996||Jan 26, 1999||Chevron Chemical Company||Low-sulfur reforming process|
|US5883031||Jan 17, 1995||Mar 16, 1999||Chevron Chemical Company||Low temperature regeneration of coke deactivated reforming catalysts|
|US5895636||Dec 2, 1997||Apr 20, 1999||Engelhard Corporation||Catalytic compositions and methods for suppression of halogenation of organic compounds with oxidation products of halogenated organic compounds in gaseous emission streams|
|US6207120||Jun 10, 1997||Mar 27, 2001||Bp Amoco Corporation||Catalytic vent gas treatment system for abatement of volatile chemical emissions|
|US6812180||Feb 19, 2002||Nov 2, 2004||Idemitsu Kosan Co., Ltd.||Method for preparing catalyst|
|US7153801||Jun 18, 2003||Dec 26, 2006||Chevron Phillips Chemical Company Lp||Aromatization catalyst and methods of making and using same|
|US20050203328||Mar 12, 2004||Sep 15, 2005||Glova David J.||Method of treating a catalytic reactor system prior to reactor servicing|
|EP0498187B1||Jan 17, 1992||Jun 14, 1995||Paul Wurth S.A.||Clay gun for a machine for plugging tapping holes in shaft furnaces|
|WO1992015654A1||Feb 27, 1992||Sep 17, 1992||Chevron Research And Technology Company||Low temperature regeneration of coke deactivated reforming catalysts|
|WO2005089923A1||Mar 10, 2005||Sep 29, 2005||Chevron Phillips Chemical Company, Lp||A method of treating a catalytic reactor system prior to reactor servicing|
|WO2009064620A2||Oct 30, 2008||May 22, 2009||Chevron Phillips Chemical Company||Characterization of a catalyst by identifying a rapid deactivation treshold point|
|1||CP Chem editorial, plus respiratory (benzene), "Statement of commitment to responsible care®," Jun. 2003, pp. i, ii, iii and 1-25, Aromatics Customer Technical Service Group, Chevron Phillips Chemical Company LP.|
|2||Final Office Action dated Oct. 16, 2008 (9 pages), U.S. Appl. No. 10/799,987, filed Mar. 12, 2004.|
|3||Foreign communication from a related application-International Preliminary Report on Patentability, PCT/US2008/081826, May 27, 2010.|
|4||Foreign communication from a related application—International Preliminary Report on Patentability, PCT/US2008/081826, May 27, 2010.|
|5||Foreign Communication from a related counterpart application-International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/ US2005/008028, Jun. 1, 2005, 11 pages.|
|6||Foreign Communication from a related counterpart application—International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/ US2005/008028, Jun. 1, 2005, 11 pages.|
|7||Foreign communication from a related counterpart application-International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US2008/081826 , Aug. 31, 2009, 16 pages.|
|8||Foreign communication from a related counterpart application—International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US2008/081826 , Aug. 31, 2009, 16 pages.|
|9||Li, Yonggang, et al., "Combined single-pass conversion of methane via oxidative coupling and dehydro-aromatization," Catalysis Letters, Nov. 2005, vol. 105, Nos. 1-2, pp. 77-82.|
|10||Logan, H. H., et al., "Catforming at united refining company," Sep. 1955, pp. 169-173, vol. 34, No. 9, Petroleum Refiner.|
|11||Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due dated Apr. 30, 2009 (6 pages), U.S. Appl. No. 10/799,987, filed Mar. 12, 2004.|
|12||Office Action dated Apr. 2, 2008 (16 pages), U.S. Appl. No. 10/799,987, filed Mar. 12, 2004.|
|13||Schneider, D. F., "Improve catalyst removal methods," Oct. 2000, pp. 39-42, Hydrocarbon Processing.|
|14||Stamey, D. J., et al., "Inert entry cuts delay, solves catalyst problems," Mar. 28, 1977, pp. 64-68, The Oil and Gas Journal.|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US8563794||Sep 13, 2012||Oct 22, 2013||Chevron Phillips Chemical Company Lp||Extending the life of an aromatization catalyst|
|US8664144||Nov 12, 2009||Mar 4, 2014||Chevron Phillips Chemical Company Lp||Methods of reactivating an aromatization catalyst|
|US8664145||Nov 12, 2009||Mar 4, 2014||Chevron Phillips Chemical Company Lp||Methods of preparing an aromatization catalyst|
|US8716161||Mar 5, 2012||May 6, 2014||Chevron Phillips Chemical Company||Methods of regenerating aromatization catalysts|
|US8912108||Feb 4, 2013||Dec 16, 2014||Chevron Phillips Chemical Company Lp||Methods of regenerating aromatization catalysts|
|US9085736||Oct 26, 2011||Jul 21, 2015||Chevron Phillips Chemical Company Lp||System and method for on stream catalyst replacement|
|US9174895||Nov 17, 2014||Nov 3, 2015||Chevron Phillips Chemical Company Lp||Methods of regenerating aromatization catalysts|
|US9387467||Sep 26, 2012||Jul 12, 2016||Chevron Phillips Chemical Company Lp||Aromatization catalysts with high surface area and pore volume|
|US9421529||Jan 20, 2014||Aug 23, 2016||Chevron Philips Chemical Company Lp||Methods of reactivating an aromatization catalyst|
|US9421530||Oct 30, 2015||Aug 23, 2016||Chevron Phillips Chemical Company Lp||Methods of regenerating aromatization catalysts|
|WO2013062695A1||Sep 20, 2012||May 2, 2013||Chevron Phillips Chemical Company Lp||System and method for on stream catalyst replacement|
|U.S. Classification||585/418, 585/906, 585/420, 585/904|
|Cooperative Classification||Y02P20/584, Y10S585/906, Y10S585/904, C10G2400/30, C10G2300/1044, C07C5/31, B01J29/90, B01J29/62, C07C2/76, B01J38/14, B01J27/13, C10G35/085, C10G45/70, B01J27/32|
|European Classification||C10G35/085, B01J27/32, C10G45/70, B01J29/90, C07C5/31, C07C2/76|
|Jan 9, 2008||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: CHEVRON PHILLIPS CHEMICAL COMPANY LP, TEXAS
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:BROWN, SCOTT H.;CHEUNG, TIN-TACK PETER;HAGEWIESCHE, DANIEL P.;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:020340/0899;SIGNING DATES FROM 20071127 TO 20071212
Owner name: CHEVRON PHILLIPS CHEMICAL COMPANY LP, TEXAS
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:BROWN, SCOTT H.;CHEUNG, TIN-TACK PETER;HAGEWIESCHE, DANIEL P.;AND OTHERS;SIGNING DATES FROM 20071127 TO 20071212;REEL/FRAME:020340/0899
|Jul 11, 2014||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4