|Publication number||US7877284 B2|
|Application number||US 11/446,512|
|Publication date||Jan 25, 2011|
|Filing date||Jun 5, 2006|
|Priority date||Jun 5, 2006|
|Also published as||US20070282622|
|Publication number||11446512, 446512, US 7877284 B2, US 7877284B2, US-B2-7877284, US7877284 B2, US7877284B2|
|Inventors||Milton H. Hernandez, Gopal Pingali, Prashant Pradhan|
|Original Assignee||International Business Machines Corporation|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (125), Non-Patent Citations (18), Referenced by (2), Classifications (11), Legal Events (4)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
The present invention generally relates to a method and system for creating an accurate skills inventory for skills retained by each independent human resource within a business concern. More particularly, the invention relates to a method and system that generates a metric for each resource, e.g., employee, contractor, etc., at the disposal of the business with respect to each of several identifiable skills.
To be competitive in the market, it is important for a business to have an accurate skills inventory. That is, it is important for the business to accurately keep track of all of the available skill resources the business has at its disposal. Furthermore, because the acquisition of new skills as well as the expansion of existing skills for a given individual is constantly changing, for example, as individuals gain experience with respect to different tasks, it is increasingly more important for the business to be cognizant of its available skills. The cost of using inaccurate skills data can be very high and potentially lead to less efficient operation of the business, low customer satisfaction, erroneous site selection to deliver a service, etc.
Also, skills are a unit of measure by which services deals are costed and priced. Accordingly, maintaining accurate skills data is non-trivial. In accordance with at least some known related art methodology, skills databases are deterministically populated using an employee's “claimed” skills, a practice that does not reflect the “true” skill value. Also, as employees evolve in their job, the skills may not be updated to reflect the evolving skill value.
Although this information is beneficial to a degree, it is not completely accurate. For example, the information provided is done so by the employee and may not reflect the actual proficiency this employee has attained regarding the specified skills. Instead, the data only indicates years of experience, which does not always reflect an accurate level of proficiency. Further, the data provided regarding the number of years is very discrete. That is, it is provided in one year increments. It is unlikely that the employee has exactly five, ten and four years, respectively, experience with each of the skills. It is more likely that the respective amount of experience for each skill includes a partial year.
Accordingly, it is desirable to provide a method and a system for accurately assessing and storing the skills available to a business with respect to each employee and other human resources available.
Illustrative, non-limiting embodiments of the present invention address the aforementioned and other disadvantages associated with related art methods of skills inventory development and maintenance. In particular, in accordance with the present invention, the above and other drawbacks related to known skill data management are addressed by capturing, observing and analyzing data from runtime operations that impact skill values corresponding to the human resources of a business group.
In accordance with one exemplary embodiment, a method of establishing a skills inventory is provided, the method comprising monitoring the activity of a resource object with respect to an activity performed by the resource object, wherein the activity performed requires at least one skill identified in a list of specified skills, extracting data relevant to the at least one skill from results of said monitoring, computing a metric value indicative of a skill level attained by the resource object with respect to each of the at least one skill and updating a skills inventory database with the computed metric value.
According to a further exemplary embodiment of the invention, a computer program product for providing a service to reuse IT system knowledge is provided, the program product comprising a computer readable medium, first program instruction means for monitoring the activity of a resource object with respect to an activity performed by the resource object, wherein the activity performed requires at least one skill identified in a list of specified skills, second program instruction means for extracting data relevant to the at least one skill from results of said monitoring, third program instruction means for computing a metric value indicative of a skill level attained by the resource object with respect to each of the at least one skill, and fourth program instruction means for updating a skills inventory database with the computed metric value.
According to a further exemplary embodiment of the invention, a system for establishing an accurate skills inventory is provided. A system in accordance with this embodiment comprises means for monitoring at least one activity performed by a resource object (e.g., a first server portion), wherein the activity performed requires at least one skill identified in a list of specified skills; means for extracting data (e.g., the first server portion), wherein the data is relevant to the at least one skill from results of the monitoring of the activity; means for computing a metric value (e.g., a second server portion), wherein the metric value is indicative of a skill level attained by the resource object with respect to each of the at least one skill and means for updating a skills inventory database with the computed metric value (e.g., the second server portion). This embodiment further may include a skills inventory database that comprises at least one record corresponding to the resource object and each record comprises at least one independent metric value corresponding to a skill that the resource object possesses.
According to an even further exemplary embodiment of the invention, a system for establishing an accurate skills inventory is provided where the system comprises a first server portion operable to execute a skills data retrieval application, wherein the skills data retrieval application receives data from a runtime application that monitors the performance of a resource object while the resource object performs at least one task and a second server portion operable to calculate at least one metric value corresponding to the at least one task performed by the resource object, wherein each metric value accounts for a plurality of predetermined parameters relevant to its respective task.
The present invention is related to the IT services area and, thus many technology-specific terms are used in describing the invention and providing the environment in which it operates. Skilled artisans would understand the intended meaning of the technology-specific terms used below, however, the following, non-exhaustive list of term definitions is provided to assist the reader. Although the list below provides a general definition of the respective terms, the definitions provided are not meant to be limiting. That is, the definitions provided are not exclusive and one skilled in the art should apply alternative or modified definitions where appropriate.
Employee Database: A database that maintains employee records and information about their skill set. Typically maintained by the HR organization in a company.
Skills Taxonomy: A classification methodology for specifying the types of skills relevant to an organization. For example, in IBM's services business, a taxonomy called JRSS (Job Requisition Skill Set) is used.
Runtime System/Runtime Operations: Refers to any system maintained by an organization that tracks and captures the history of the work done by its employees.
Ticketing System: An example of a runtime system in the services business. Records and tracks the various IT systems management requests made by a customer. Information includes the names of person(s) who work on the requests through various stages, the time taken, the kind of IT system the request applies to, etc. Examples used in the services business (by IBM and others) include eESM, Remedy, Peregrine, etc.
Information Model/Data Model: Refers to a data structure imposed on top of the records/logs of a runtime system that extracts the relevant fields in the records for further processing.
Exemplary, non-limiting, embodiments of the present invention are discussed in detail below. While specific configurations and process flows are discussed to provide a clear understanding of the invention, it should be understood that the disclosed process flows and configurations are provided for illustration purposes only. A person skilled in the relevant art will recognize that other process flows and configurations may be used without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
An embodiment consistent with the present invention comprises a method to accurately capture a value indicative of a person's skill with respect to various skills impacted by the person's activities. More particularly, a value which is indicative of the person's skill level is calculated by observing and analyzing the data from runtime operations that gather data in near-real-time as the person is gaining, or in some cases losing, experience with respect to various skills.
In accordance with at least one embodiment, data from various information sources, for example, problem and change ticketing systems, is analyzed to determine what tasks a particular person has worked on in the recent past. The tasks are then mapped to a standard skills classification methodology, or taxonomy, such as IBM's JRSS skill codes, or another taxonomy for which skill values can be gleaned.
For each skill code relevant to the particular person, a metric is computed that captures the skill level. The computed metric takes into account various relevant parameters, such as, the number of relevant tasks completed by the person, the time that was required to complete the task(s) and how long ago these tasks were performed. The calculated metric, together with the skill codes, is associated with the particular person and stored in a database.
In addition to the parameters mentioned above, those skilled in the art would know that other parameters of interest can be used without straying from the spirit of the invention.
First, a metrics database M with one record for each employee is created. Each record further contains a sub-record for each type of skills the employee has. This sub-record includes a score assigned to the employee for that skill type. For an employee with unique identifier 1, the sub-record is referred to for skill type S, e.g., M(I,S).
The following represents exemplary pseudo-code for the calculation of the metric value. In particular, for each record r in the runtime log the following is performed:
Apply information model on the record to get structured record R;
N = Extract employee name from R;
I = Unique identifier for this employee;
S = Extract skill type from R;
T = Extract time the task was performed;
Modify the skill sub-record for this employee as follows:
M(I,S) = f ( M(I,S) , T , S ); This applies a function f to the
metrics record, which depends on the previous value of the skill sub-
record, the time and the skill used.
When the above loop ends, each record in the runtime database will have been processed, each kind of skill an employee has exercised will have been identified, and a score will have been assigned to each such skill.
The function f can be very general, since we can store any information in the skill sub-records and pass it as a parameter to the next computation of the sub-record.
An exemplary environment in which the present invention might be used is in the context of a company's Help Desk. In particular, a resource object, such as an employee working at the Help Desk, performs various tasks to achieve a particular result. For instance, a Help Desk employee may be working remotely over a network to resolve a customer's IT-related problem.
According to one Help Desk method, when a customer calls into the Help Desk to report a problem, a “ticket” is created for that call. The ticket includes data such as, the particular problem; to what hardware and/or software components the problem relates; the time problem resolution began; the time the problem was resolved, or, in some cases the time problem resolution was abandoned; what steps were taken in pursuit of a resolution, and any other relevant data.
While the resource object is performing his or her job function to resolve the customer's problem, at least one runtime application, such as runtime applications 10 and 20, gather data with respect to the process the employee undertakes in resolving the issue. That is, runtime applications 10 and 20 capture data with respect to the performance of the resource. For example, a runtime application such as eESM (IBM's eEnterprise Solutions Management application), logs data relevant to change management. Another example of a runtime application that captures data relevant to the resource's performance is ManageNow, which logs data for problem management. In addition to the applications mentioned, those skilled in the art would understand that various runtime applications that capture relevant data can be used in accordance with the present invention. That is, any application, or number of applications, that captures data in accordance with a specified taxonomy, described below, can be used in accordance with this embodiment.
As illustrated in
Calculation of a metric in accordance with one exemplary embodiment of the present invention will now be described.
Using the Help Desk example discussed above, as an employee is working at the Help Desk, runtime programs such as eESM and ManageNow log data regarding the employee's performance. Data is extracted from the logs and an information model is imposed on the data using IBM's JRSS taxonomy.
According to this embodiment, three time periods are considered, i.e., periods 0, 1 and 2, each of a duration T. X(t) is the set of tickets closed in the tth time period, S(X(t)) is the total severity of these tickets, N(X(t)) is the number of tickets in the set and a is a weighting parameter. For example, a has a value less than 1 such that the larger values give more weight to activities performed by the resource object more recent in time and, alternatively, gives less weight to actions performed in the more distant past.
Based on the information model presented, the metric value for the given resource object with respect to a given skill is:
After the metric is calculated, the skills inventory is updated with the calculated skill value, i.e., metric value calculated, for the given resource object for the particular skill type.
The invention can take the form of an entirely hardware embodiment, an entirely software embodiment or an embodiment containing both hardware and software elements.
In a further embodiment, the invention is implemented in software, which includes but is not limited to firmware, resident software, microcode, etc.
Furthermore, the invention can take the form of a computer program product accessible from a computer-usable or computer-readable medium providing program code for use by or in connection with a computer or any instruction execution system. For the purposes of this description, a computer-usable or computer readable medium can be any apparatus that can contain, store, communicate, propagate, or transport the program for use by or in connection with the instruction execution system, apparatus, or device.
The medium can be an electronic, magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, infrared, or semiconductor system (or apparatus or device) or a propagation medium. Examples of a computer-readable medium include a semiconductor or solid state memory, magnetic tape, a removable computer diskette, a random access memory (RAM), a read-only memory (ROM), a rigid magnetic disk and an optical disk. Current examples of optical disks include compact disk-read only memory (CD-ROM), compact disk-read/write (CD-R/W) and DVD.
A data processing system suitable for storing and/or executing program code will include at least one processor coupled directly or indirectly to memory elements through a system bus. The memory elements can include local memory employed during actual execution of the program code, bulk storage, and cache memories which provide temporary storage of at least some program code in order to reduce the number of times code must be retrieved from bulk storage during execution.
Input/output or I/O devices (including but not limited to keyboards, displays, pointing devices, etc.) can be coupled to the system either directly or through intervening I/O controllers.
Network adapters may also be coupled to the system to enable the data processing system to become coupled to other data processing systems or remote printers or storage devices through intervening private or public networks. Modems, cable modem and Ethernet cards are just a few of the currently available types of network adapters.
It would be understood that a method incorporating any combination of the details mentioned above would fall within the scope of the present invention as determined based upon the claims below and any equivalents thereof.
Other aspects, objects and advantages of the present invention can be obtained from a study of the drawings, the disclosure and the appended claims.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US4835372||Jul 24, 1987||May 30, 1989||Clincom Incorporated||Patient care system|
|US5724262||Oct 11, 1994||Mar 3, 1998||Paradyne Corporation||Method for measuring the usability of a system and for task analysis and re-engineering|
|US5734837||Jan 14, 1994||Mar 31, 1998||Action Technologies, Inc.||Method and apparatus for building business process applications in terms of its workflows|
|US5765138||Aug 23, 1995||Jun 9, 1998||Bell Atlantic Network Services, Inc.||Apparatus and method for providing interactive evaluation of potential vendors|
|US5774661||Apr 18, 1995||Jun 30, 1998||Network Imaging Corporation||Rule engine interface for a visual workflow builder|
|US5826239||Dec 17, 1996||Oct 20, 1998||Hewlett-Packard Company||Distributed workflow resource management system and method|
|US5850535||Oct 12, 1995||Dec 15, 1998||Computervision Corporation||Roll-back during regeneration on a computer-aided design system|
|US5870545||Apr 4, 1997||Feb 9, 1999||Hewlett-Packard Company||System and method for performing flexible workflow process compensation in a distributed workflow management system|
|US5884302||Jan 17, 1997||Mar 16, 1999||Ho; Chi Fai||System and method to answer a question|
|US5937388||Mar 21, 1997||Aug 10, 1999||Hewlett-Packard Company||System and method for performing scalable distribution of process flow activities in a distributed workflow management system|
|US6049776 *||May 20, 1998||Apr 11, 2000||Unisys Corporation||Human resource management system for staffing projects|
|US6131085||Aug 28, 1996||Oct 10, 2000||Rossides; Michael T||Answer collection and retrieval system governed by a pay-off meter|
|US6249769||Nov 2, 1998||Jun 19, 2001||International Business Machines Corporation||Method, system and program product for evaluating the business requirements of an enterprise for generating business solution deliverables|
|US6263335||Mar 29, 1999||Jul 17, 2001||Textwise Llc||Information extraction system and method using concept-relation-concept (CRC) triples|
|US6339838||Jan 2, 1998||Jan 15, 2002||At&T Corp.||Control of commercial processes|
|US6363384||Jun 29, 1999||Mar 26, 2002||Wandel & Goltermann Technologies, Inc.||Expert system process flow|
|US6438594||Aug 31, 1999||Aug 20, 2002||Accenture Llp||Delivering service to a client via a locally addressable interface|
|US6453269||Feb 29, 2000||Sep 17, 2002||Unisys Corporation||Method of comparison for computer systems and apparatus therefor|
|US6473794||May 27, 1999||Oct 29, 2002||Accenture Llp||System for establishing plan to test components of web based framework by displaying pictorial representation and conveying indicia coded components of existing network framework|
|US6496209||Aug 5, 1999||Dec 17, 2002||Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha||Status display unit using icons and method therefor|
|US6523027||Jul 30, 1999||Feb 18, 2003||Accenture Llp||Interfacing servers in a Java based e-commerce architecture|
|US6526387||Aug 30, 1999||Feb 25, 2003||International Business Machines Corporation||Method, system and program product for determining the value of a proposed technology modification|
|US6526404||Jan 29, 1999||Feb 25, 2003||Sopheon Edinburgh Limited||Information system using human resource profiles|
|US6618730||Jun 16, 2000||Sep 9, 2003||Ge Capital Commercial Finance, Inc.||Methods and systems for managing workflow|
|US6675149||Aug 30, 1999||Jan 6, 2004||International Business Machines Corporation||Information technology project assessment method, system and program product|
|US6738736||Oct 6, 2000||May 18, 2004||Accenture Llp||Method and estimator for providing capacacity modeling and planning|
|US6810383||Apr 6, 2000||Oct 26, 2004||Xactware, Inc.||Automated task management and evaluation|
|US6865370||Dec 3, 2003||Mar 8, 2005||Mindfabric, Inc.||Learning method and system based on questioning|
|US6879685||Mar 4, 2002||Apr 12, 2005||Verizon Corporate Services Group Inc.||Apparatus and method for analyzing routing of calls in an automated response system|
|US6907549||Mar 29, 2002||Jun 14, 2005||Nortel Networks Limited||Error detection in communication systems|
|US6970803||Oct 25, 2002||Nov 29, 2005||Electronic Data Systems Corporation||Determining the complexity of a computing environment|
|US6988088||Oct 17, 2000||Jan 17, 2006||Recare, Inc.||Systems and methods for adaptive medical decision support|
|US6988132||Oct 17, 2001||Jan 17, 2006||Microsoft Corporation||System and method for identifying and establishing preferred modalities or channels for communications based on participants' preferences and contexts|
|US7010593||Apr 30, 2001||Mar 7, 2006||Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.||Dynamic generation of context-sensitive data and instructions for troubleshooting problem events in a computing environment|
|US7039606||Mar 23, 2001||May 2, 2006||Restaurant Services, Inc.||System, method and computer program product for contract consistency in a supply chain management framework|
|US7114146||May 2, 2003||Sep 26, 2006||International Business Machines Corporation||System and method of dynamic service composition for business process outsourcing|
|US7236966||Mar 8, 2002||Jun 26, 2007||Cisco Technology||Method and system for providing a user-customized electronic book|
|US7260535||Apr 28, 2003||Aug 21, 2007||Microsoft Corporation||Web server controls for web enabled recognition and/or audible prompting for call controls|
|US7293238||Apr 4, 2003||Nov 6, 2007||Raytheon Company||Graphical user interface for an enterprise intrusion detection system|
|US7315826||May 27, 1999||Jan 1, 2008||Accenture, Llp||Comparatively analyzing vendors of components required for a web-based architecture|
|US7364067||Mar 22, 2006||Apr 29, 2008||Intellidot Corporation||Method for controlling processes in a medical workflow system|
|US7403948||May 14, 2003||Jul 22, 2008||Fujitsu Limited||Workflow system and method|
|US7412502||Apr 18, 2002||Aug 12, 2008||International Business Machines Corporation||Graphics for end to end component mapping and problem-solving in a network environment|
|US7467198||Sep 29, 2005||Dec 16, 2008||Accenture Llp||Architectures for netcentric computing systems|
|US7562143||Jan 13, 2004||Jul 14, 2009||International Business Machines Corporation||Managing escalating resource needs within a grid environment|
|US7580906||Jul 31, 2007||Aug 25, 2009||Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.||Automated adaptive computer support system generating problem solutions having confidence levels used to determine whether human expert intervention is required|
|US7707015||Jan 18, 2005||Apr 27, 2010||Microsoft Corporation||Methods for capacity management|
|US20010047270||Feb 15, 2001||Nov 29, 2001||Gusick David L.||Customer service system and method|
|US20020019837||May 1, 2001||Feb 14, 2002||Balnaves James A.||Method for annotating statistics onto hypertext documents|
|US20020055849||Jun 29, 2001||May 9, 2002||Dimitrios Georgakopoulos||Workflow primitives modeling|
|US20020091736||Jun 23, 2001||Jul 11, 2002||Decis E-Direct, Inc.||Component models|
|US20020111823||Oct 1, 2001||Aug 15, 2002||Thomas Heptner||Quality management method|
|US20020140725||Aug 5, 1999||Oct 3, 2002||Hitoshi Horii||Status display unit using icons and method therefor|
|US20020147809||Oct 17, 2001||Oct 10, 2002||Anders Vinberg||Method and apparatus for selectively displaying layered network diagrams|
|US20020161875||Apr 30, 2001||Oct 31, 2002||Raymond Robert L.||Dynamic generation of context-sensitive data and instructions for troubleshooting problem events in information network systems|
|US20020169649||May 14, 2001||Nov 14, 2002||Lineberry Susan S.||Methods and systems for performing acquisition integration|
|US20020186238||Nov 19, 2001||Dec 12, 2002||Sylor Mark W.||Interactive hierarchical status display|
|US20030004746||Apr 24, 2002||Jan 2, 2003||Ali Kheirolomoom||Scenario based creation and device agnostic deployment of discrete and networked business services using process-centric assembly and visual configuration of web service components|
|US20030018629||Jan 31, 2002||Jan 23, 2003||Fujitsu Limited||Document clustering device, document searching system, and FAQ preparing system|
|US20030018771||Mar 4, 2002||Jan 23, 2003||Computer Associates Think, Inc.||Method and apparatus for generating and recognizing speech as a user interface element in systems and network management|
|US20030033402||Apr 7, 2000||Feb 13, 2003||Reuven Battat||Method and apparatus for intuitively administering networked computer systems|
|US20030065764||Sep 26, 2001||Apr 3, 2003||Karen Capers||Integrated diagnostic center|
|US20030065805||May 23, 2002||Apr 3, 2003||Barnes Melvin L.||System, method, and computer program product for providing location based services and mobile e-commerce|
|US20030097286||Oct 18, 2002||May 22, 2003||Vitria Technologies, Inc.||Model driven collaborative business application development environment and collaborative applications developed therewith|
|US20030101086||Nov 22, 2002||May 29, 2003||Gregory San Miguel||Decision tree software system|
|US20030154406||Aug 21, 2002||Aug 14, 2003||American Management Systems, Inc.||User authentication system and methods thereof|
|US20030187719||Aug 30, 2002||Oct 2, 2003||Brocklebank John C.||Computer-implemented system and method for web activity assessment|
|US20030225747||Jun 3, 2002||Dec 4, 2003||International Business Machines Corporation||System and method for generating and retrieving different document layouts from a given content|
|US20040024627||Jul 24, 2003||Feb 5, 2004||Keener Mark Bradford||Method and system for delivery of infrastructure components as they related to business processes|
|US20040158568||Oct 30, 2003||Aug 12, 2004||Renzo Colle||Scheduling resources for performing a service|
|US20040172466||Feb 25, 2003||Sep 2, 2004||Douglas Christopher Paul||Method and apparatus for monitoring a network|
|US20040181435||Jun 14, 2002||Sep 16, 2004||Reinsurance Group Of America Corporation||Computerized system and method of performing insurability analysis|
|US20040186757||Mar 19, 2003||Sep 23, 2004||International Business Machines Corporation||Using a Complexity Matrix for Estimation|
|US20040186758||Mar 20, 2003||Sep 23, 2004||Yilmaz Halac||System for bringing a business process into compliance with statutory regulations|
|US20040199417||Jul 2, 2003||Oct 7, 2004||International Business Machines Corporation||Assessing information technology products|
|US20050027585||May 7, 2004||Feb 3, 2005||Sap Ag||End user oriented workflow approach including structured processing of ad hoc workflows with a collaborative process engine|
|US20050027845||Jan 13, 2004||Feb 3, 2005||Peter Secor||Method and system for event impact analysis|
|US20050066026||Sep 18, 2003||Mar 24, 2005||International Business Machines Corporation||Method of displaying real-time service level performance, breach, and guaranteed uniformity with automatic alerts and proactive rebating for utility computing environment|
|US20050091269||Oct 24, 2003||Apr 28, 2005||Gerber Robert H.||System and method for preference application installation and execution|
|US20050114306||Nov 20, 2003||May 26, 2005||International Business Machines Corporation||Integrated searching of multiple search sources|
|US20050136946||Dec 17, 2003||Jun 23, 2005||Nokia Corporation||System, method and computer program product for providing differential location services with mobile-based location tracking|
|US20050138631||Dec 17, 2003||Jun 23, 2005||Victoria Bellotti||System and method for providing metadata interaction and visualization with task-related objects|
|US20050159969||Jan 21, 2004||Jul 21, 2005||Sheppard Robert F.||Managing information technology (IT) infrastructure of an enterprise using a centralized logistics and management (CLAM) tool|
|US20050187929||Feb 19, 2004||Aug 25, 2005||First Data Corporation||Methods and systems for providing personalized frequently asked questions|
|US20050203917||Mar 11, 2005||Sep 15, 2005||Ocean And Coastal Environmental Sensing, Inc.||System and method for delivering information on demand|
|US20050223392||Mar 24, 2005||Oct 6, 2005||Cox Burke D||Method and system for integration of software applications|
|US20060067252||Sep 30, 2004||Mar 30, 2006||Ajita John||Method and apparatus for providing communication tasks in a workflow|
|US20060069607||Sep 28, 2004||Mar 30, 2006||Accenture Global Services Gmbh||Transformation of organizational structures and operations through outsourcing integration of mergers and acquisitions|
|US20060112036||Oct 1, 2004||May 25, 2006||Microsoft Corporation||Method and system for identifying questions within a discussion thread|
|US20060112050||Oct 14, 2005||May 25, 2006||Catalis, Inc.||Systems and methods for adaptive medical decision support|
|US20060129906||Oct 19, 2005||Jun 15, 2006||Decis E-Direct, Inc.||Component models|
|US20060168168||Mar 19, 2004||Jul 27, 2006||Cisco Technology, Inc.||Assisted determination of data flows in communication/data networks|
|US20060178913||Jan 3, 2006||Aug 10, 2006||Anne Lara||Medical and other consent information management system|
|US20060224569||Jul 11, 2005||Oct 5, 2006||Desanto John A||Natural language based search engine and methods of use therefor|
|US20060224580||Apr 28, 2005||Oct 5, 2006||Quiroga Martin A||Natural language based search engine and methods of use therefor|
|US20060235690||Apr 17, 2006||Oct 19, 2006||Tomasic Anthony S||Intent-based information processing and updates|
|US20060282302||Apr 28, 2006||Dec 14, 2006||Anwar Hussain||System and method for managing healthcare work flow|
|US20060287890||Jun 15, 2005||Dec 21, 2006||Vanderbilt University||Method and apparatus for organizing and integrating structured and non-structured data across heterogeneous systems|
|US20070043524||Aug 17, 2005||Feb 22, 2007||International Business Machines Corporation||System and methods for quantitatively evaluating complexity of computing system configuration|
|US20070055558||Aug 21, 2006||Mar 8, 2007||Shanahan James G||Method and apparatus for probabilistic workflow mining|
|US20070073576||Sep 29, 2005||Mar 29, 2007||International Business Machines Corp.||Resource capacity planning|
|US20070073651||Sep 23, 2005||Mar 29, 2007||Tomasz Imielinski||System and method for responding to a user query|
|US20070083419||Oct 6, 2005||Apr 12, 2007||Baxter Randy D||Assessing information technology components|
|US20070118514||Nov 15, 2006||May 24, 2007||Rangaraju Mariappan||Command Engine|
|US20070168225||Nov 22, 2006||Jul 19, 2007||Sultan Haider||Workflow generator for medical-clinical facilities|
|US20070219958||Mar 31, 2006||Sep 20, 2007||Park Joseph C||Facilitating content generation via participant interactions|
|US20070234282||Mar 31, 2006||Oct 4, 2007||Uta Prigge||Composite application modeling|
|US20070282470||Jun 5, 2006||Dec 6, 2007||International Business Machines Corporation||Method and system for capturing and reusing intellectual capital in IT management|
|US20070282644||Jun 5, 2006||Dec 6, 2007||Yixin Diao||System and method for calibrating and extrapolating complexity metrics of information technology management|
|US20070282645||Jun 5, 2006||Dec 6, 2007||Aaron Baeten Brown||Method and apparatus for quantifying complexity of information|
|US20070282653||Jun 5, 2006||Dec 6, 2007||Ellis Edward Bishop||Catalog based services delivery management|
|US20070282655||Jun 5, 2006||Dec 6, 2007||International Business Machines Corporation||Method and apparatus for discovering and utilizing atomic services for service delivery|
|US20070282659||Jun 5, 2006||Dec 6, 2007||International Business Machines Corporation||System and Methods for Managing Complex Service Delivery Through Coordination and Integration of Structured and Unstructured Activities|
|US20070282692||Jun 5, 2006||Dec 6, 2007||Ellis Edward Bishop||Method and apparatus for model driven service delivery management|
|US20070282776||Jun 5, 2006||Dec 6, 2007||International Business Machines Corporation||Method and system for service oriented collaboration|
|US20070282876||Jun 5, 2006||Dec 6, 2007||Yixin Diao||Method for service offering comparitive it management activity complexity benchmarking|
|US20070282942||Jun 2, 2006||Dec 6, 2007||International Business Machines Corporation||System and Method for Delivering an Integrated Server Administration Platform|
|US20070288274||Jun 5, 2006||Dec 13, 2007||Tian Jy Chao||Environment aware resource capacity planning for service delivery|
|US20070292833||Jun 2, 2006||Dec 20, 2007||International Business Machines Corporation||System and Method for Creating, Executing and Searching through a form of Active Web-Based Content|
|US20080065448||Sep 8, 2006||Mar 13, 2008||Clairvoyance Corporation||Methods and apparatus for identifying workflow graphs using an iterative analysis of empirical data|
|US20080109260||Mar 23, 2007||May 8, 2008||Intellidot Corporation||Electronic data capture in a medical workflow system|
|US20080213740||May 14, 2008||Sep 4, 2008||International Business Machines Corporation||System and Method for Creating, Executing and Searching through a form of Active Web-Based Content|
|US20080215404||May 15, 2008||Sep 4, 2008||International Business Machines Corporation||Method for Service Offering Comparative IT Management Activity Complexity Benchmarking|
|US20090012887||Mar 1, 2007||Jan 8, 2009||T.K.T Technologies Ltd.||Method And System For Provision Of Personalized Service|
|WO2007143516A2||May 31, 2007||Dec 13, 2007||International Business Machines Corporation||System and method for creating, executing and searching through a form of active web-based content|
|1||"A Capacity Planning Model of Unreliable Multimedia Service Systems", by Kiejin Park and Sungsoo Kim, Department of Software, Anyang University, Kangwha, Incheon, South Korea, Jul. 2001.|
|2||"Project MEGAGRID: Capacity Planning for Large Commodity Clusters", An Oracle, Dell, EMC, Intel Joint White Paper, Dec. 2004.|
|3||BEA Systems, Inc., "BEA White Paper-BEA AquaLogic Service Bus-IT's Direct Route to SOA," printout from http:// www.bea.com/content/news-events/white-papers/BEA-AQL-ServiceBus-wp.pdf, Jun. 2005.|
|4||BEA Systems, Inc., "BEA White Paper—BEA AquaLogic Service Bus—IT's Direct Route to SOA," printout from http:// www.bea.com/content/news—events/white—papers/BEA—AQL—ServiceBus—wp.pdf, Jun. 2005.|
|5||Cape Clear Software, Inc., "Cape Clear 6.5", printout from http://www.capeclear.com/download/CC65-Broch.pdf, copyright notice 2005.|
|6||Cape Clear Software, Inc., "Cape Clear 6.5", printout from http://www.capeclear.com/download/CC65—Broch.pdf, copyright notice 2005.|
|7||Cordys, "Cordys Enterprise Service Bus-Capabilities," printout from http://www.cordys.com/en/Products/Cordys-ESB-capabilities.htm, printed on Jun. 26, 2006.|
|8||Cordys, "Cordys Enterprise Service Bus—Capabilities," printout from http://www.cordys.com/en/Products/Cordys—ESB—capabilities.htm, printed on Jun. 26, 2006.|
|9||Ganesarajah, Dinesh and Lupu Emil, 2002, Workflow-based composition of web-services: a business model or programming paradigm?, IEEE Computer Society.|
|11||M.D. Harrison, P.D. Johnson and P.C. Wright. "Relating the Automation of functions in multi-agent control systems to a system engineering representation." Department of Computer Science, University of York, Heslington, York. UK. Aug. 13, 2004.|
|12||Mercury, Mercury Capacity Planning (Powered by Hypertormix), 2004.|
|13||Oracle, "Enterprise Service Bus," printout from http://www.oracle.com/appserver/esb.html, printed on Jun. 27, 2006.|
|14||PolarLake Limited, "Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) Resoure Center," printout from http://www.polarlake.com/en/html/resources/esb/, printed on Jun. 27, 2006, copyright notice dated 2006.|
|15||Sonic Software, "ESB Architecture & Lifecycle Definition," printout from http://www.sonicsoftware.com/products/sonic-esb/architecture-definition/index.ssp, printed on Jun. 26, 2006.|
|16||Sonic Software, "ESB Architecture & Lifecycle Definition," printout from http://www.sonicsoftware.com/products/sonic—esb/architecture—definition/index.ssp, printed on Jun. 26, 2006.|
|17||Team Quest, Capacity Planning with TeamQuest Analytic Modeling Software, printed from http://www.teamquest.com/solutions-products/solutions/planning-provis....on Jun. 4, 2006.|
|18||*||Tracking Your Changing Skills Inventory: Why It's Now Possible, and What It Means for Your Organization From CIO.Com Mid 2002 IT Staffing Update Brainbench.|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US20090037246 *||Jul 31, 2007||Feb 5, 2009||Caterpillar Inc.||Resource allocation system and method|
|DE102014016676A1||Nov 12, 2014||May 12, 2016||Raimund Reisacher||Verfahren zur rechnergestützten Auswahl von Bewerbern aus einer Vielzahl von Bewerbern für ein vorgegebenes Anforderungsprofil|
|U.S. Classification||705/7.14, 705/7.42|
|Cooperative Classification||G06Q10/105, G06Q10/063112, G06Q10/06398, G06Q10/06|
|European Classification||G06Q10/06, G06Q10/06311B, G06Q10/06398, G06Q10/105|
|Sep 22, 2006||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION, NEW Y
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:HERNANDEZ, MILTON H.;PINGALI, GOPAL SARMA;PRADHAN, PRASHANT;REEL/FRAME:018332/0616;SIGNING DATES FROM 20060915 TO 20060922
Owner name: INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION, NEW Y
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:HERNANDEZ, MILTON H.;PINGALI, GOPAL SARMA;PRADHAN, PRASHANT;SIGNING DATES FROM 20060915 TO 20060922;REEL/FRAME:018332/0616
|Sep 5, 2014||REMI||Maintenance fee reminder mailed|
|Jan 25, 2015||LAPS||Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees|
|Mar 17, 2015||FP||Expired due to failure to pay maintenance fee|
Effective date: 20150125